The Coronation of King Edward VII (1902) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Before Its Time
boblipton14 March 2008
Although Melies was a groundbreaker in many aspects of the cinema, including telling stories, fade cutting, trick films, stag films and religious stories, this one may hold the record: the story is that in order to meet the demand for films of the coronation, he filmed this reenactment -- and released it before Edward was crowned!

This is one of the many previously lost or infrequently seen Melies pictures that have been made available by Serge Bromberg, David Shepherd and a myriad of other hands in the newly issued DVD set GEORGES MELIES: FIRST WIZARD OF CINEMA. Required viewing for anyone interested in the history of movies ..... and a lot of fun.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Elaborate fakery with authentic "book-end" footage
The earliest 'newsreel' films were in fact fakes: re-enactments produced in a studio, with (usually amateur) actors impersonating the public figures, and often ludicrously bad stage effects to simulate fire, flood and other forces of nature. 'The Coronation of Edward VII' is one more such fake, but is notable for being a much more elaborate production than others of its kind ... and is also notable because it's a 'pre-enactment' of a real event, having been filmed BEFORE (rather than after) the actual event it purports to depict.

The synopsis of this movie (elsewhere on this IMDb site) is both an accurate rundown of the film and also an accurate recounting of the coronation ceremony itself, being so heavily ritualised as to be more or less scripted. However, the fakery is obvious to modern viewers and was probably obvious even to unsophisticated film audiences of the time. 'Westminster Abbey', as seen here under the harsh and flat studio lighting, is clearly a painted set. The actors cast as H.M. Edward VII and his consort Queen Alexandra -- amateurs supposedly chosen for their physical resemblance to the real figures -- are obvious fakes. The actor playing the king is too thin, and his beard is too small (the real Edward VII, after decades of soft living, was quite heavy-set indeed when he finally succeeded to the throne). The actress playing Queen Alexandra looks nothing like her, and is too heavy. Worse luck, the (fake) Archbishop of Canterbury and the other priests are garbed in robes which look more appropriate for a French Catholic mass than for an Anglican service.

Filmmaker Georges Melies and his (American-born) British producer Charles Urban made considerable effort to have this film shot, edited, printed and shipped to exhibitors in time for Coronation Day, so that audiences who couldn't watch the actual event would be able to witness this enactment simultaneous to the actual coronation! On Coronation Day, Urban set up a Bell & Howell camera outside Westminster Abbey and shot authentic footage of the royal carriage arriving for the coronation and departing afterward. This footage -- genuine newsreel -- became book-ends, spliced before and after Melies's faked footage of the coronation. So, audiences who saw this film after Coronation Day were at least able to witness some authentic footage at the beginning and the end.

More for the effort and ingenuity put into it than any historic value, I'll rate this movie 7 out of 10.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Coronation of Edward VII
Michael_Elliott3 April 2008
Coronation of Edward VII, The (1902)

** (out of 4)

aka La Sacre d'Edouard VII

Historical drama from the French master tells pretty much exactly what the title says. Now that I've watched a few of Melies non-magic films, I can't say that I'm too impressed. It seems there's never a clear story trying to be told and instead we just see one little scene that in the end really doesn't amount to anything worth noting. This film runs nearly four minutes and for the most part we just see Edward walking around. What does stand out about this film are the nice sets and wonderful costume design. These two things make the film worth watching once but the director has better films out there.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Chance to Pretend to See Royalty
Hitchcoc13 November 2017
While all the figures are actors, there is an effort made to give acceptable performances of an historical event. Here it is the coronation of a king with all the pomp and ceremony therein. Melies makes everything pretty claustrophobic out of necessity, but it still works pretty well. Since the audiences had no access to their monarchs other than still photographs and drawings, this would have bee quite a treat.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Trying to fool the public? Who knows....
planktonrules6 September 2020
Back around the turn of the 20th century, sometimes filmmakers didn't have access to great events of the day...so some of the time they simply faked it! For example, when the assassin who killed President McKinley was executed, the Edison Company faked it...convincing the audiences that they were seeing an actual electrocution! But it was all staged and when seen today, it sure looks it. Well, I couldn't help but think of this as I watched Méliès' "The Coronation of Edward VII"....a lavish (for its time) production in which you seem to see the king of Great Britain being crowned. But it was all made in a very elaborate set...far more elaborate and realistic than you'd expect....even from master filmmaker George Méliès. Apparently, this is because the Brits paid him handsomely for such a film to be shown to audiences following the actual ceremony. Now it is possible that the filmmakers never intended to deceive anyone and folks were told it was a re-creation...though based on other similar sorts of films, I doubt it.

As far as quality goes, while still a bit stagy, this one is truly amazing for the time. One of Méliès' best, though not nearly as much fun nor as interesting as his film "The Voyage to the Moon" or a few of his other goodies.

By the way, I have no idea if it's true but according to Tornado_Sam, this film was NOT intended to fool and explained on the poster that it was a recreation by the director.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An elaborate historical reenactment film with plenty of detail
Tornado_Sam3 May 2017
The title pretty much tells you right off the bat that this is not one of Melies' magic films and is merely a run-through of the coronation ceremony of King Edward shortened to fit the length of the film's run-time. Since King Edward got ill before the coronation, however, it was delayed and Melies was able to make and release this movie before the actual event (along with producer Charles Urban who sold it through the Biograph Company). It's actually pretty interesting to watch considering how much money appears to be sunk into the set design, as well as all the actors--over 150, to be precise. In fact, the visual interest would be one of the biggest reasons the average person would see it now. Little actually happens within its run-time otherwise and to many people today it would come off quite boring. I myself find it interesting anyways since it shows how many different film genres this great director explored.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed