Interference (1928) Poster

(1928)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Not bad if you realize it's Paramounts very first talking picture
AlsExGal17 January 2010
Of course, this film is going to be of interest primarily to film history buffs and fans of early sound film, but it is not so static and halting in speech as many early talkies were.

Paramount's high production values are in full bloom here, and William Powell, in his first talking role, does a pretty good job of playing the dissolute playboy, Philip Voaze, presumed killed in action during World War I. Evelyn Brent plays Deborah Kane, the rejected girlfriend who spots Philip at his own memorial service. It's hard to believe such an attractive woman would still be carrying a torch for someone who threw her over so many years before. After tracking Philip down, Deborah still evokes no emotion from him - he wants no part of her. However, Deborah is a vengeful woman and she blames Faith, the girl that Philip dumped her for and married before the war began, for her troubles.

Deborah also realizes that she has a blackmail worthy scandal in the fact that Faith is now married to a prominent surgeon, Sir John Marlay (Clive Brook). This makes Faith a bigamist. What I could never figure out is why the letters written between Faith and Philip were such hot items in this blackmail scheme. They were written before Philip went to war and before she ever met and married Dr. Marlay and ,after all, Philip had been pronounced legally dead years before.

At any rate, Faith is shortly thereafter confronted by the seething rejected mistress who delights in tormenting her, and Deborah requests the sum of five hundred pounds at frequent intervals or else she will sell her letters and story to the newspapers. At first Faith comes up with the money, but when she winds up short she finally tells everything to her husband. Philip also finds out about the blackmail. 24 hours later Deborah is discovered dead from poison found almost exclusively in a doctor's possession. Faith, Sir John, and Philip have all had access to this concoction. The question is, who did it? The story is pretty good and well acted by all of the players. There are a few gestures that appear to be hold-overs from the silents such as someone giving a speech, waiting a few seconds, and then burying their head in their hands. However, all in all, this is a worthy first effort at sound film by Paramount. The cinematography was very well done with frequent cross-cutting between static scenes that give the illusion of movement. The video is in pretty good shape for a 1928 film, but the sound is rather poor through the first third of the film. One aspect that was really rather poorly done was William Powell's makeup. He plays a man with a degenerative heart condition that is slowly killing him. To make him appear increasingly sick, makeup is applied that has more of the effect of making him look like some kind of silent film villain than someone who is desperately ill. By the film's conclusion his face is almost completely white and he has dark circles painted on under his eyes.

Recommended for students of early sound film and fans of William Powell, of which I am both.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A rite of passage
gridoon202415 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
"Interference" is slow, static, verbose, sometimes poorly recorded....but it's also intriguing and even compelling at times. The opening credits announce five characters, the last of whom is an inspector who doesn't appear for a long time, so you suspect that there must be a murder in there somewhere (Brandon Hurst has the honor of playing probably the first in a looooong line of wily inspectors in the talkies). Evelyn Brent gives the best performance - she's natural and comfortable with sound, plus she's kind of a badass! (when Clive Brook threatens her, she responds: "If I had less experience with men, I'd take you seriously!"). Brook is also convincing; William Powell hadn't quite found his footing yet but he shows some of his potential; Doris Kenyon is not bad at all, but she plays the typical helpless female and thus she is the least interesting character of the main four. The film may feel like a trial sometimes, but it's a trial worth passing through for any serious film buff, if only for the fact that it's one of only a handful of still-surviving all-talking pictures made in 1928; it's quite an experience. **1/2 out of 4.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Historic Milestone In Cinema With Paramount's First All-Talkie
springfieldrental26 May 2022
Roy Pomeroy was Paramount Pictures most highly respected specialist in his field. He had won the Academy Award for Engineering Effects for his work in 1927's "Wings." He made the parting of the Red Sea possible in Cecil B. DeMille's 1923 "The Ten Commandments." He was a wizard when it came to working with new technology. Pomeroy's value was recognized when the studio appointed him as head of its research department.

Paramount was the first film studio to promise after October 1927's "The Jazz Singer" was released that it would produce only audible movies from now on. The studio aimed to make "All-Talkies," meaning the entire movie would be from beginning to end synchronized with dialogue and music with no inter titles. Since Pomeroy had visited the RCA and Western Electric labs to study their sound systems, he had an understanding of microphone placements and how dialogue could be captured onto film. As studio co-owner Jesse Lasky noted, "We couldn't have treated him with more awe and homage if he had been Edison himself."

Most Hollywood directors were afraid to step forward and handle their studios' first sound production. Paramount turned to Pomeroy, who had never directed a movie in his life, to be the primary director for its first all-talkie film. Sensing a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to get rich, he demanded his $250 per week salary be raised ten-fold to $2,500. "He threw his weight around,'" noticed propman Joe Youngerman, "He claimed he knew all about it." And he actually did. He was comfortable with the new audio gear, making suggestions on where to place the mics and advised his inexperienced technical crew on all the aspects of sound recording. The only problem for Pomeroy was his lack of creativity in camera shot selections. But that didn't stop the sound version of November 1928's "Interference" to become a rousing success at the box office.

The plot, based on a popular Broadway play, involves a World War One soldier, Philip Voaze (William Powell) returning to England without telling his wife Faith (Doris Kenyon). His wife had received notification from the War Department that her husband had been killed, and proceeded to marry Dr. John Marlay (Clive Brook). Conniving Deborah Kane (Evelyn Brent) sees Philip at a war memorial service and decides to blackmail Faith for bigamy. A murder takes place and the story becomes a who-done-it for the police to find out the perpetrator.

"Interference" began a cascade of talking pictures. The Film Spectator reviewer predicted "not only will all-talking pictures completely supplant silent pictures within a year, but in less than five years, they will supplant stage productions." "Interference's" competition that night in New York City was Al Jolson's part-singing, part-talkie 'The Singing Fool,' as well as the courtroom all-talkie (now lost) 'On Trial." The later was criticized for its sound quality and its actors looking uncomfortable gathering around hidden microphones.

"Interference," the second oldest all-talkie film to have survived, was released five months after the earliest one, June 1928's "The Lights of New York." Both movies' enormous financial successes are attributed to viewers' curiosity with the new format. By early spring of 1929 when studio personnel gained more experience working with the audio equipment, the quality of the all-talkies improved drastically. As one film historian wrote, "As others mastered talkie mystery, geniuses of a year before seemed not so ingenious anymore." Pomeroy, so cocky at his audio expertise on the set, demanded a further raise to $3,500 a week when Paramount offered him another directing assignment. The studio thought he was good, but not that good. Paramount let him walk by giving William DeMille, Cecil's brother, the director's chair instead. Pomeroy directed only two more films, 1930's 'Inside The Lines' and 1934's 'Shock,' an ignominious conclusion to an illustrious career.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
For historians only
earlytalkie12 May 2013
This film is Paramount's first full talkie and it was highly thought of at the time of it's release. Alas, it doesn't wear well today. Directed by special-effects golden boy Roy Pomeroy, this film is possibly slower paced than Warner's first all-talking effort, The Lights of New York, released a few months earlier. Evelyn Brent easily takes the acting honors here, although the entire cast suffers under Pomeroy's leaden direction. Legend has it that Pomeroy, full of himself after conquering some of the technical problems of early sound filming, demanded a raise from $250.00 per week to $2,500.00 per week. He got that, but upon completion of Interference asked for $3,500.00. By that time some of Pomeroy's "secrets" were becoming more well-known to the other directors. Pomeroy was shown the door. Watching this early production directed by a technician, we can be thankful that clearer heads prevailed and good direction was just around the corner from this effort. This film is of interest to film buffs, but you won't need to take a sleeping pill before going beddy-bye if you sit through all of this.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interference review
JoeytheBrit3 May 2020
Paramount's first talkie sees most of the cast enunciating their lines in typically somnolent fashion, and takes twice as long as it should to tell it's tale, but still just about manages to entertain. Remarkable how sickly William Powell looks with a couple of dark circles painted under his eyes. He at least seems at ease acting instead of miming.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Paramount's first talker, a film buff's holy grail, but...
arthursward26 October 2002
Not a great film, or even a very good one, the main point of interest in watching Interference is its place in history.

In 1928, most film theaters were either owned by a film studio or "block" booked so that a patron of that venue would always see a Fox Film (if it was a "Fox" theater), a Paramount film (if it was a Paramount theater) and so on. Indeed, to this day, many old palaces still bear these logos though the practice ended mid-century. For a large chunk of filmgoers, this was the birth of a new art form. And for this reason, for me, watching "Interference" was irresistable.

I viewed an old MCA TV 16mm print (on tape) that had been transferred using the 1:16 Movietone matte. This matte normally obscures the soundtrack which intruded the left side of the picture until 1931. Films of this period were usually sent to theaters according to the sound system that particular theater used: sound-on-film or Vitaphone disc. [Also very confusing for directors struggling for decent photographic composition] This print had sound on disc and consequently the titles and action got cropped on the left side.

Our story concerns a war veteran (Powell) attending a memorial service. As he had been erroneously reported as killed in action, an old girlfriend (Brent)is shocked to see him. She gives chase, and it is revealed his wife has married and English lord. The girlfriend threatens to tell and the 'interference' begins.

William Powell is very watchable, until he does his drunk scene. Unfortunately, I've seen all the 'Thin Man' films and have seen him take 'tipsy' to new heights. His hand movements, here, are smooth and precise. Evelyn Brent is even better, giving a real star performance of a confused, vengeful mistress. Mr. Brook 's just fine, adequately uppity. The thing just falls apart with Doris Kenyon's scenes. She's lost and I fault the director, J. Roy Pomeroy. It's just so obvious, all of her lines are delivered like questions, with the inflection tailing up at the end.

Now, J. Roy Pomeroy had never directed a film before. In a perfect example of being in the right place at the right time, Pomeroy was head of the special effects department at Paramount when a committee to study the sound "fad" was formed. He was named technical advisor to study which sound system (Vitaphone disc, RCA or Western Electric sound-on-film) was superior for Paramount, MGM, Universal, First National and Producer's Distributing Organization. His decree was each were perfectly satisfactory, the confusion began. A quote given to Variety in 1928: "One year will be required to photograph a feature picture accompanied by a complete dialogue duly recorded by a soundtrack." The 'expert' went on to point out that in a dialogue, silence must follow each character's speech lest the audience become lost. Pomeroy worked on the post-synchronized "Warming Up", a Richard Dix baseball comedy. First hand accounts sound hilarious.

Then, as an expert in a field of one, he was assigned to direct Paramount's first talker. He demanded his $250 per week salary be increased to $2,500. Henry Hathaway recalled he spat on you as he talked, "you'd get all wet." But he couldn't direct. "Interference" is the proof.

So enjoy the Lothar Mendes production touches and plot twists. I enjoyed imagining myself at a theater in 1928, seeing what all the fuss is about. Evelyn Brent fans should consider this a must-see.
25 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Evelyn Brent Shines in Paramount's Most Important Film of 1928!!!
kidboots20 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Stilted, very much a filmed stage play, "Interference" being Paramount's first all talkie was it's most important film of 1928. It was designed to be a "special event" with impresario Daniel Frohman appearing in a talking prologue (not in the print I saw) and promising that "thanks to the talkies, no more will our best plays be confined to a few big cities". It did show what would happen to the cinema in the next couple of years - the fluidity of the silent cinema camera was bought to a static, grinding halt as movies were filmed in one or two rooms, with characters being grouped around tables and vases of flowers where microphones could be hidden.

What really appealed to contemporary critics was the cultured way the actors spoke and that it was the first talkie done in "the drawing room manner" - boy, how sick everyone would soon be of "teacup dramas". It did not have a plot that involved bootleggers, gangsters or chorus girls. Actors spoke in a refined way, not in the "dese, dems and dose" vernacular. The praiseworthy reviews helped to shackle films to rigidity, although there were a couple of scenes that did advance cinema technique. When Evelyn Brent weeps, viewers only hear her but see William Powell's face trying to figure out what to do next, the same thing happens when she writes a letter - you know she is writing but only Powell's calculating face is shown. Apparently critics of the day thought it was such a wonderful revelation as it would save money on sets!!!

Phillip Voaxe (William Powell) arrives back in town in time to attend his own memorial service. He was just one of many soldiers listed as missing in action during World War One. At the service, Della (Evelyn Brent), a discarded and vengeful mistress, recognizes him but when he refuses to resume their relationship she begins her interference. When they had originally been involved, Phillip had been married to Faith (Doris Kenyon), who has since married heart specialist John Marley (Clive Brook). Della wastes no time in visiting Faith, to tell her the news and also to inform her that she has incriminating letters - so the blackmailing begins.

Phillip accidentally meets Faith when he visits Dr. Marley as a patient. William Powell, Evelyn Brent, Doris Kenyon and Clive Brook - possibly the most distinguished cast in a very early talkie, but for me, Evelyn Brent, a veteran of silent films far outshone the rest. She was outstanding and with a clear voice proved she was a natural for talking pictures. She should have had a very long career but by the early 30s she was beginning to be a fixture on poverty row. Clive Brook, on the other hand, was so stiff, his occupation could well have been a butler - even giving a little butler like bow when leaving Della - "Mi Lady"!!!

Just when you think the movie is ending - Della is killed and even though you know who the guilty party is - A is instantly suspected because of the little bottle of poison that she has taken from her husband's surgery. B is in a rare flurry of activity and obliterates all traces of the poison - then C confesses, it is made clear he is dying of a heart ailment and will not stand trial, he barely makes it to the door before he collapses in the policeman's arms.

Roy Pomeroy was the director and it is a crazy story that could only have happened in the riotous, panic stricken year when talkies came to stay. A year or so previously he had been a special effects whiz who had devised the eye catching scenes in "The Ten Commandments". He was then sent on a tour of Western Electric to learn all about sound (only because no-one else wanted to!!) He came back armed with know how and power. He asked for a rise from $250 a week to $2,500 and got it because nobody else at the studio knew how to shoot sound. But when he demanded $3,500 a week for his next movie he was out because by now others knew the secret!!

Recommended.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lucky Powell, Plucky Brent
JohnHowardReid22 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
William Powell's talkie debut in "Interference" (1928) is easily his worst film, though he himself is reasonably effective, and he is even partially successful in foreshadowing the screen charisma he was later to achieve. The director, Roy J. Pomeroy, was actually Paramount's special effects specialist (whose movie work in this field is far more extensive than the few films on which he received a screen credit). At this stage, Pomeroy had made a study of the various sound systems, and not only considered himself an expert but had convinced the Paramount brass likewise. In this movie, Pomeroy hoped to break the special effects mold in which he was caught and become a full-fledged director. Unfortunately, his hopes were bound up in a then-immovable sound microphone, forcing him to stage scenes with little or no camera movement. This makes it very obvious that certain actors, particularly Clive Brook, Doris Kenyon and Brandon Hurst, are playing to the mike, much as the original actors played to the audience in London's West End. (Oddly, in a reversal of the usual procedure, the play didn't open on Broadway until after the film was released). So, aside from a few inserts lifted from the silent version directed by Lothar Mendes, what we have here is very much a filmed stage play. The pacing is slow and deliberate. Of the four principals, only Powell comes over with colors flying – but only partly due to his histrionic ability. Powell's character, as written, is supposed to move slowly and speak deliberately. Considering she doesn't have the same good fortune, Evelyn Brent (chillingly successful here in a totally unsympathetic role) comes out of the movie best -- if "best" is an adjective that can be applied to a movie that looks for all the world like a very mediocre stage play; that moves with the speed of a snail; that is so dialogue-bound as to stretch the patience of even a most indulgent audience; that exhibits little or nothing in the way of directorial flair; and, worst of all, has the impoverished look of a movie made on a tight "B" budget.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watch For Brent
David_Brown28 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Is this a great film? Certainly not. But it is worth catching if you can, because; 1: Powell's Paramount Films are difficult to find, and almost anything of his is worth watching ("Jewel Robbery" and musicals excluded). 2: Evelyn Brent. Her Deborah Kane is really a nasty character, who deserved exactly what she got Major Spoilers ahead: Getting poisoned to death by Phillip Voaze (Powell), the dying ex of Kane. What is interesting, a variation of Kane (Both in attitude and looks) would be found in Powell's next film ("The Canary Murder Case"). In that film (Like this one), the murderer is far more sympathetic then the victim. However, the "Canary" (Margaret O'Dell), would be played by Louise Brooks, and Powell would play Philo Vance, which would lead to "The Thin Man." The main reason to watch is Evelyn Brent, then Powell. Everyone else? Forget it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed