Two Against the World (1932) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Bennett a sheer delight
blanche-22 June 2013
Constance Bennett stars with Neil Hamilton in "Two Against the World," a precode film from 1932. When a compact is found left on a bed, it just has to be precode.

Bennett plays Dell Hamilton, a beautiful socialite who falls for an attorney (Hamilton). This leads to problems when she tries to protect her family and winds up on the witness stand, with Hamilton on the side of the prosecution.

Decent drama, melodramatic as was the style, with Bennett looking dazzling in a variety of '30s outfits. She gives a lively performance -- flirtatious, charming, and warmhearted. Hamilton is solid and an unlikely candidate as a romantic lead. Thirty-plus years later, he would play Commissioner Gordon on "Batman." I always love watching Constance Bennett in films, and this one was no exception.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Eating Beans at the Stork Club
LeonLouisRicci7 August 2015
What an Odd Ending. This Entertaining Poke at the Snobbish Elite who Go about Their Detached, Uncaring, Whimsical Ways in the Throes of the Great Depression and much Human Suffering is Average or slightly above.

Constance Bennett's Natural Acting is in full Command and the Supporting Cast Lead by Neil Hamilton are OK. The Film is Professionally Handled and the Social Concerns of the Time are Given Appropriate Due.

But, there isn't anything Outstanding here and it's kind of Pedestrian and the Ending is "Out to Lunch" at a Diner, Eating Beans. However, Fans of Bennett and Early Talking Cinema might Want to Check this one out. Just Don't Expect any Great Shakes. Pass the Ketchup.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
If ever there was a shrew who needed taming....
mark.waltz14 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
She's the type of person that when she asks for a match, you're tempted to light her on fire. Constance Bennett is a spoiled socialite who thinks she's above any type of rule, aghast that you can't get to the fourth floor quickly because she is asked to put out her cigarette in a no smoking elevator. But when you meet her family you understand exactly why she is the way she is, and it's going to take a lot of patience to find anything endearing to like about her.

Yet when she smiles, she's radiant, so that's probably what attorney Neil Hamilton sees in her. Later on, she hands a poor mother inside Hamilton's office who's suing her father (Walter Walker) $100, promising more. Definitely a confliction in her own persona, becoming more so when she witnesses her brother (Allen Vincent) commit murder and Hamilton becomes the prosecutor, she's determined not to have to testify, and even lies to the press.

The charm of its leading lady and the elegance of its leading man should have made this one much more interesting of a pre-code than it is. Bennett and her whole family are genuinely despicable, so the audience from the start wants to see them brought down. Everyone in the family wants the case settled in their favor for their own selfish reasons.

Helen Vinson, Clara Blandick, Roscoe Karns and Alan Mowbray co-star. With such a lavish look , but an amoral bunch of privileged haves, it doesn't have a purpose other than exploiting (then) recent front page headlines.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scandal, Snobbery & Romance
wireshock15 November 2003
The unlikely romantic pairing of Constance Bennett and Neil Hamilton somehow works in this fast paced critique of privileged society. Constance is a spoiled rich girl (something she's always good at playing!) who tries to bend the rules once too often in a desperate attempt to protect her family. It doesn't help that Neil Hamilton, in one of his warmer performances as a do-gooder attorney, has to grill her on the witness stand despite his being in love with her. These two headstrong people are forced to bend a little in each other's direction as circumstances dictate: she learns that being privileged doesn't necessarily mean being better; he that being ethical may have its moral limits.

Constance Bennett's energy and wit find an unusual focus in her romantic pursuit of Hamilton. She may not be willing to give up caviar for the luncheon special beans he prefers, but she's game to keep on trying!
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Better than you'd think
klg192 August 2004
While Carole Lombard would perfect the dizzy-socialite-gets-social-conscience shtick four years later in "My Man Godfrey," the sadly under-appreciated Constance Bennett does the genre fine in this film. She's matched with a surprisingly effective Neil Hamilton, probably best known to the world as Police Commissioner Gordon, from the "Batman" television series. Both give natural and believable (within the scope of the story) performances.

The payoff verdict will leave you unconvinced (and modern trial lawyers convulsed with laughter), but on the whole the movie is worth watching. Watch for it on Turner Classic Movies.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It's the Depression...and the filmmakers want us to care about this group of worthless rich jerks?!
planktonrules2 April 2017
So, 1932 is the height of the Depression and millions of folks are out of work. And yet, despite this, Hollywood is cranking out tons of films where you'd never think a depression was on and the stars are all rich and happy...like "Two Against the World". And, you make the rich folks in this particularly self-absorbed and loathsome. This must have been a hard sell back in the day.

When the film begins, the Hamilton family is meeting with their lawyer. It seems that an employee in the company they own died and he is asking them how to proceed. Not one of the family asks if the family of the deceased has a valid claim...they just seem bored and instruct the lawyer not to accept a settlement. At this point, I really HATED the Hamiltons and wanted them to pay and pay dearly. Adele (Constance Bennett) is roused from her boredom about all this when the lawyer for the deceased family arrives. Dave Norton (Neil Hamilton) is handsome and instantly Adele is smitten and pursues him vigorously throughout the film.

Later, in a weird plot twist, Adele's brother murders someone. She witnesses it and she runs. Soon the murder case is dropped because they have no leads. But Norton pushes the Defender's Office to re- open the case...and he doesn't realize that Adele is caught up in it.

The bottom line is that Adele and her family are amoral jerks...so how is the audience supposed to care one bit about her and her brother?! The story is also completely unbelievable and rather silly. Because of this, I disliked the film intensely and see it as a seriously flawed movie. Nice production values but a seriously messed up story that should have left viewers storming out of the theater!
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Constance Bennett - A Gem!
sunchicago31 May 2013
Wonderful movie for its time - great story with lots of intricate twists - and while I agree that the pairing of Bennett and Hamilton might be a bit off, it was wonderfully (naturally) acted all around. It was particularly fun to see Helen Vinson in such a feminine light before she became known for her "shrewish" roles (see "In Name Only" for one) and "Aunt Em" Clara Blandick as the snobbish spinster aunt was fun, too. Anticipating the "human clotheshanger" Bennett's appearance each scene is always fun. Don't agree that Carole Lombard would have been right for this role - just not enough sophistication for the part although no flies on her!!! Very enjoyable and I also underline how underrated Constance Bennett was!!!
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Another dull Constance Bennett movie
ArtVandelayImporterExporter27 September 2022
How many times did the studio crank out a Constance Bennett movie where her only "skill" was changing from one expensived outfit to another. All her movies are stagey, talky, stiff and flat. And she's a low-energy mouse with all the s3x appeal a cat lady.

How could anyone in the Depression be in a hurry to fork out a nickel to watch her go through the same motions in every movie?

As for all those obnoxious male actors in tuxes, they made me cheer for the Bolsheviks. Or in a pinch, the Japanese.

I enjoyed seeing Neil Hamilton (aka Batman's Commissioner Gordon) as a dashing young man. Wasn't enough to convince me to sit through the whole thing, though.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Densely-packed fast-moving pre-coder with more than appears at first glance
RickeyMooney18 January 2021
I never cease to be amazed at how in the early 1930s they were able to pack twice as much plot, action, social comment and ideas in 70-minute movies than exist in today's movies that are twice as long.

This one was very loosely inspired by a contemporary scandal about a murder committed by a rich socialite "defending his sister's honor" as they used to say in the era of the sexual double standard that underlies so many plots in those days.

Yes, as some have pointed out, some of the main characters are spoiled rich people. So are some of the main characters in novels by Tolstoy, Henry James and Edith Wharton. If it bothers you, go back to your Spiderman movies.

The plot revolves about a budding romance between Constance Bennett, one of the more spoiled idle rich and a member of the family involved in the scandal, and Neil Hamilton as a socially conscious attorney formerly from her social class.

The pace is so fast that it takes some time to sort all the characters out, which may deter you at first but it all becomes clear eventually. The film takes jabs at sensationalistic tabloids, the double standard and our justice system's bias towards the rich, but like everything else in the movie, doesn't linger on these any longer than needed to make its point.

Not to say that the movie is at all preachy. There's plenty of comedy and snappy dialogue along the way.

If you seek uplift, Bennett's character gains much insight into her own nature and lifestyle as the film advances but, again, the point isn't belabored.

Bennett and Hamilton both charm in their roles and the whole cast is excellent.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Bennett Shines
hotangen1 February 2015
This film was made right after the successful What Price Hollywood, which was a departure from Bennett's string of confession stories that made her the highest paid actress in the business. In this film, Bennett is even better. The plot is familiar - the only surprise being that Bennett's wastrel brother doesn't get what he deserves - but the plot doesn't matter. This is the story of a girl who meets the man she can happily live with for the rest of her life, though there is a big bump enroute to the happy ending. Bennett is reteamed with Neil Hamilton - her love interest in What Price Hollywood - and he proves that he's the man who can tame this privileged rich girl, who thinks traffic signs and no smoking in the elevator don't apply to her.

In 1932 Bennett was getting bad press for her high-hat ways and big spender habits, so the scriptwriters wrote a scene in Hamilton's law office where she gives $100 to his destitute client with a promise of more to come. Hamilton says approvingly, "That was a very nice thing for you to do", which the audience could hardly fail to approve of as well, thereby softening her image.

Bennett/Dell is confident and flirtatious, a young woman who goes after what she wants, and it's immediately evident that she wants the not rich Hamilton, who is smitten with her at first sight. Bennett is gorgeous, stunning in her furs and hats and gowns. Her acting throughout is spot on, and in the climatic courtroom scene she is impressive. Her moods on the witness stand shift from haughtiness to fear to relief and then to suspense as prosecutor Hamilton stares at her for a nerve wracking minute before speaking.

Bennett had a wider range than she's reputed to have, wider than Shearer and Crawford, neither of whom could do comedy. This film should have been the beginning of a long career with one triumphant film following another. Instead, it was the beginning of the end of her stardom. And why Hamilton didn't become a major star like Bennett's frequent movie partner, Joel McCrea, is another mystery.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Far-Fetched But Entertaining
Michael_Elliott9 December 2013
Two Against the World (1932)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Rich socialite Adele Hamilton (Constance Bennett) begins dating an honest lawyer (Neil Hamilton) but soon she's mixed up in a murder, which her brother committed. Trying to shield her brother, everything goes as planned until the lawyer becomes the prosecutor on the case. TWO AGAINST THE WORLD is a fairly entertaining courtroom drama that's certainly far-fetched but the performances make it worth sitting through. Obviously, it would be nearly impossible for the lawyer to have to go up against a woman he's been dating and seen with socially but we'll just pretend that doesn't matter. What works the best with this film is that Bennett gives an extremely good and believable performance as the rich woman who is constantly just in the wrong place at the wrong time. I liked how the screenplay made her a very strong woman who believed in doing what it takes to protect those around her and I really enjoyed the final showdown in the courtroom. Again, it's far-fetched but the charm and toughness of Bennett really comes across. Hamilton is also very good in his role as the good-hearted lawyer who finds himself in a tough situation. The supporting players include nice performances from Roscoe Karns, Galvin Gordon and Helen Vinson. Director Archie Mayo could handle this type of film in his sleep so obviously he has no problem keeping it going at a very good pace. At just 70-minutes the film never seems too long and instead it flows at a good pace.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed