23 1/2 Hours Leave (1937) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Well, this movie sure SEEMS like 23-1/2 hours... Warning: Spoilers
"23-1/2 Hours' Leave" was originally a story by Mary Roberts Rinehart, an author hugely popular in her lifetime who is now largely forgotten. The story was filmed in 1919 as a starring vehicle for Douglas MacLean. He must have liked it, because MacLean obtained the film rights and produced this remake in 1937, with the action still set in Rinehart's original 1917. I once viewed a damaged print of the silent version that had a couple of reels missing, and I had difficulty following the story. This remake turns out to be radically different from its predecessor, omitting a couple of subplots and running gags that didn't help the silent version. But what it replaces them with isn't much of an improvement.

Allegedly we're on a cavalry base of the American Expeditionary Force during the Great War. The uniforms seem authentic enough, but the civilian clothes (and the marcelled hairstyle of actress Terry Walker) are firmly 1937 vintage. Who wrote this movie's dialogue? It's full of words that one almost never hears spoken in real life, such as 'sorrowfully' and 'cantonment'. And I was deeply annoyed that nearly every character in this movie refers to flapjacks as 'pattycakes'. I've studied the American slang of that time period -- military and civilian -- but I've never encountered that usage. Also, would a new auto in 1917 (with standard features) retail for $2,000? I doubt it.

This is one of those movies in which one sharpie (James Ellison) keeps breaking the rules and getting away with it, while the other characters stand on the sidelines and exclaim about how brilliant he is. Worse luck, his behaviour is implausible. Ellison is cast as a cavalry sergeant who wears non-regulation underwear and a tailored uniform (instantly rumbled as non-regulation); I just couldn't believe that a real non-commissioned officer would do this.

Oddly, this movie is a semi-musical: at unexpected moments, Ellison and some of the other cast members burst into song ... but this happens so seldom and so sporadically that the transitions into and out of the songs are much more unwieldy than they would be in a full-fledged musical. And the songs are quite lacklustre. Fans of Ward Bond will be intrigued that he sings briefly here, and very well! Terry Walker (who?) sings pleasantly and is nice to look at, but she shows very little screen presence. The best performance here is by Arthur Lake, in a characterisation very different from his usual Dagwood Bumstead performance.

A subplot about foreign spies is barely developed, and I couldn't believe that spies would waste their time on this cavalry regiment. The cavalrymen know in advance the date when they'll ship out for Europe: I know for a fact that the soldiers in the real AEF were *not* told when they'd ship out. A fight sequence in this movie, featuring dozens of brawling he-man soldiers in a duplex barracks, is easily the single worst-staged (and most implausible) brawl I've ever seen in decades of movie-watching ... with the men flinging cotton batting at one another, instead of throwing their fists. At least the silent version of this story correctly kept the apostrophe in its title. I'll rate this clunker just 2 points out of 10.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Clichéd and dull
dbborroughs26 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Dated comedy about a soldier who bets that he can have breakfast with the general in the morning.

Not very good remake of a story I'm sure worked in the 1917 original when this wasn't as cliché. Its amusing to a point but we've been here before in any number of better films since then. The film also suffers in that there really isn't much snap in the proceedings and at times it seems more like a machine that is unwinding the a story that is evolving. More curiously is the odd musical numbers that seem to come out of nowhere.

An odd film thats not really worth the effort
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
While Ellison's singing is nice, the film is very clichéd and about as exciting as watching worms crawling across the sidewalk.
planktonrules13 January 2014
James Ellison stars as Sergeant Gray in this WWI musical romantic comedy. However, as you watch the film you wonder if the US Army was THAT desperate that they'd make this knucklehead a sergeant!! He is not a very good soldier and is a bit of a fathead. In fact, he even bets his fellow enlisted men that he can wrangle an invite to the General's house for breakfast! Along the way, he gets into lots of wacky situations, meets and falls in love with the General's daughter AND captures two enemy spies! Despite all this, it's amazing how bad the film is--mostly because it's so dull. Additionally, it's filled with clichés and is a film I can't see a sane person recommending! Not a horrible film but certainly not a good one. The best aspect might be the singing (which I usually dislike) as Ellison did have a nice voice. But this just isn't enough and the film comes off as cheap and dopey.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
If they're defending our country, we're in big trouble!
mark.waltz22 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
More interested in singing and flirting than defending our country, this group of recruits are more prank prone than the Dead End Kids. At the center of the buffoonery is handsome James Ellison who makes the idiotic bet that he'll get the general (gruff Paul Harvey) to invite him for breakfast and order "patty cakes" while unknowingly courting his daughter (Terry Walker). Food fights, theft of clothes and various other hi-jinks take place throughout this B musical that doesn't give me much confidence in a pre-war United States. On the verge of his long running role as Dagwood in the "Blondie" movies, Arthur Lake is recognizable as one of the soldiers. Ellison sings adequately but the songs are mediocre and not a way to distract from the lame attempt at comedy.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I can understand people not liking this movie, but if you've served in the army yourself...
JohnHowardReid26 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I had a very pleasant surprise last night. My best friend recommended I take a look at "23½ Hours Leave". I wasn't even aware that I had this Alpha DVD in my collection! But there it was, and on it went! I enjoyed every minute of it. I'd never heard James Ellison sing before – and he was great! The critics who downgrade this splendid film obviously don't realize that the movie itself is obviously a skit – and the sort of skit that is actually produced in an army camp for the entertainment of the troops. I produced such a skit myself when I was in the army. The idea is to way exaggerate everything about life in the camp. Thus gate inspection becomes a do-or-die ordeal, a fist fight is blown up to a wild mêlée and the adjoining town is over-run with spies! Uniforms don't fit of course and the hero here takes up the slack by getting his professionally tailored! Everyone hates to get up in the morning – except for the general. He's an idiot, but he's always on time. Add a few rousing songs, and you're all set. Of course, the movie has the advantage of a real woman for its heroine in the person of the super-lovely Terry Walker (whose career for some unknown reason went rapidly downhill), but all the other army types are here from the aggressive to the jokesters and the connivers to the sitters on the sidelines!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed