Battleground (1949) Poster

(1949)

User Reviews

Review this title
100 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Christmas crisis in the Ardennes, December 1944
smiley-3922 May 2001
This is not a large scale multi-million dollar epic of World War Two. No thousands of extras, no wide panoramic sweep of battle scenes. This says more about The Battle of the Bulge than the movie of the same name. It's just an ordinary black and white M.G.M. production. What it lacks in size and scope it makes up for in impact.A simple story very well told, of a squad of GI's of the 101st Airborne Division, thrown into the maelstrom that was the German offensive in the Ardennes in December of 1944 against the Allied ground forces.

It's hard to believe that this film was not shot on location; but on a Metro sound stage. And Metro's Culver City was turned into the only outdoor location for the snow-covered, rubble-strewn town of Bastogne under siege, which was tenaciously held by the 101st, under the command of Brig. General Anthony McAuliffe.

With the exception of Van Johnson as Pvt. Holly who was high profile on the Metro lot in his time, and George Murphy as Pvt. Stazak, the rest of the cast were character-type actors who filled their roles perfectly. James Whitmore as Sgt. Kinnie is drilling the squad in the opening scenes.

The squad members talk of an enjoyable furlough in Paris which is suddenly cut short by the German breakthrough in the Ardenne. Ptv. Stazak hopes of going home are dashed because his authorised documents have not come through before the squad moves up front. Douglas Fowley as Pvt. Kippton seems to be the best in the squad at bellyaching.Maybe it's his dentures that make him a sourpuss. But Fowley's dentures turn into a class act; clicking away to the old song, "I Surrender Dear," through the courtesy of a German propaganda broadcast heard over the radio in a Sherman tank. Denise Darcel comes as a welcome relief of feminine pleasure; not out of place in the town of Bastogne itself. In an indoor scene, Pvt. Holly's eyeballs go into left-to-right overdrive as he stares at Denise's buxom rear end descending a flight of stairs. Then there's Holly again, nursing stolen newly-laid eggs, as valuable as gold nuggets. He's about to scramble them over a fire when the squad is told to saddle up and move out. Not for the first time does Johnson (Pvt. Holly) yell, "oh no!" A expression he's used in past movies also. The broken eggs in his upturned helmet are now a problem. In the end it's disaster. The German artillery scramble the eggs for Holly. Problem solved!

On a three man patrol, Holly, Hodiak as Janness, Montalban as Rodriguez, intercept and force a jeep carrying a Major and two sergeants to stop and identify themselves. The knowledge that Germans are infiltrating in GI uniforms has made the patrol suspicious so the Major is asked how the Dodgers made out in 1944. The Major hesitates,but the Sergeant in the rear seat asks Holly who Betty Grable is married to. Montalban shouts back, "Cesar Romero". The Major says Romero is out. "Betty Grable is married to Harry James". The tense atmosphere relaxes. The patrol is convinced they're friendly.

What is displayed authentically on this studio sound stage is the icy, bone-chilling atmosphere of the battlefield. The men hunkered down; the deeper the better, in their foxholes. Throughout nearly all this movie there is the constant rise and fall in the background of continuous artillery fire, like a rolling thunder. It never seems to cease. Sometimes it's close, sometimes distant. That, along with the freezing fog hanging like a thick whitish-grey blanket in the air, enveloping everything, gives off an atmosphere of crisis; a feeling of fearful tension. The men endeavour to dispel the fear with humour. Waiting and wondering when the enemy will appear ghost-like out of the mist-shrouded forest.

Near the end of the movie, Leon Ames gives a good performance as a Army Chaplain. Trying to explain the reason for this necessary trip to Europe, to kill off a murderous political system that has already killed off millions. Before the end, the tables turn in the Allies favour. Sergeant Kinnie notices his shadow against the snow. The sun is breaking through and the mist rises. Allied tactical air power is back in business again with a vengeance.

Veteran director William Wellman was not found wanting when he directed this movie. He had already proved himself with, "The Story of GI Joe", in 1945. Antiwar film? Any war film well made and convincing can be antiwar, and you do not need blood all over the silver screen to prove it. Antiwar or not, World War Two was a "popular" war. The reasons stuck out a mile. The Army Chaplain said so in so many words.

The Ardennes offensive caught the Allies unawares, in short, too cocksure. By late 1944, battered the German forces may have been. But they still had a few nasty shots in their locker to scare the living daylights out of the Allied Command. The allies paid the penalty in lost ground and casualties for General Eisenhower's insistence for a broad front advance. We thought the Germans had run out of fighting steam, but old Field Marshal Karl Rudolf Gerd Von Rundstedt thought different!
65 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Men at war
jotix10027 May 2006
"Battleground" is a curious film that came out of Hollywood in 1949. WWII had been over, so the public was not wishing for more war films at the time. Yet, MGM went ahead with this project and gave it to William Wellman, a veteran director who knew his craft. The film was written by Robert Pirosh.

The movie is a curiosity also because it was shot in Culver City, yet, at times, it gives the impression of having been shot on location in the Ardennes. The casting of some of the best acting talents MGM had under contract at the time contributes to give the film another dimension, as the viewer becomes involved with these men that are trying to survive during the worst possible conditions.

In spite of some of the criticism in this forum, the film has a real feeling because it stresses the dependency among the men that are caught in the conflict. Their every day lives back home is at the center of the conversation one hears the men talk about. Wives, children, sweethearts, parents, and even popular figures of the pop culture, like Bette Grable, are the basis of communication as the men idle away waiting to be called to fight the enemy.

Van Johnson, John Hodiak, Ricardo Montalban, George Murphy, Marshall Thompson, Don Taylor, Leon Ames, and a wonderful James Whitmore, are seen as the soldiers around Bastogne. Denise Darcel is seen as the kind French woman who befriends the soldiers.

Ultimately, "Battleground" is William Wellman's tribute to the men in uniform.
36 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Battered Bastards Of Bastogne.
hitchcockthelegend10 March 2011
Dedicated to the battered bastards of Bastogne, this major player in the war film genre is directed by William Wellman & tells the story of a U.S. Army division involved in what became known as the Battle of the Bulge. The terrific cast features George Murphy, John Hodiak, Ricardo Montalban, Van Johnson and James Whitmore. The film was nominated for four Academy Awards and won two - one for Robert Pirosh's bold and fluctuating screenplay and one for Paul Vogel's realism inducing black-and-white cinematography.

Battleground is an important war film in many ways. Coming as it did at the tail end of the 40s, it was not required to be a flag waving morale booster for a country at war. Free of this burden, Wellman & Pirosh (an actual veteran of the Bastogne engagement), crafted a grunts eye view of the war. Forcing us the viewers to spend the whole of the movie with one army squad (the 101st Airborne Division), we get to know them, their fears & peccadilloes etc. Pirosh cleverly telling it as it was, scared men doing their duty. It's that we have been with them as their persona's have been laid bare, that makes the battle sequences even more potent. The jokes have stopped, the camaraderie and harmless rivalries replaced by men crying for their mothers or in some mud hole fighting for their lives. This snow covered and fog shrouded part of Belgium a bleak canvas for the harshness of war (amazingly shot on the lot). It's a stunningly structured film, one that doesn't resort to type, it subverts the many war film plot developments that are rife in genre pieces that both preceded and came post its release.

The cast are uniformly strong, and all get get ample time to impact on the narrative. Something that isn't always the case with ensemble pieces. Somebody else was strong too, Producer Dore Schary, who had to fight an unconvinced Louis B. Mayer (MGM head man) to get the film made. Schary's faith in the piece was rewarded as the film became a critical darling and a box office winner. It's not hard to see why for this is a realistic and gritty look at the hardships of war and those that fought in it. Influencing many that followed it by entertaining without gusto histrionics, Battleground is still very much a template war film. 8.5/10
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Most underatted and forgotten movie of WW2 ever...
acerimmer30818 January 2005
Before "Band of Brothers" came out, I considered this the best, most accurate depiction of an infantry unit in action ever, and I still think it has an edge over "Saving Private Ryan" and "Patton" as the greatest World War II movie(not mini-series) yet made.

The entire cast is not only fun to watch, but very believable in their individual roles, and as a veteran, I can attest to the fact that the swings between humor and deep thoughts in their conversations are dead on accurate. Anybody who's ever served in an infantry unit will tell you that for all the bickering back and forth, members of a squad, platoon, or company will always look out for each other. "Battleground" captures this perfectly.

One of the saddest things for me about this movie is how few people know of it. Except for the occasional airing on AMC or TCM, it rarely shows up on TV and that's a shame. It's well worth the time and effort to find this one.
116 out of 126 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I like this movie more every time I see it.
garygorf25 December 2004
"Battleground" is probably the best movie made about the Battle of the Bulge. After seeing "Band of Brothers", I bought "Battleground" and watched it for the fourth(?) time. I thought the characters were well done. I saw this movie for the second time when I was in the US Army, and it turned me off. I couldn't believe guys were measuring their chances of getting off the line by hoping for the million dollar wound, or some other malady. The third time I saw this movie, I had grown up and realized that, human nature being what it is, nothing about their behavior was abnormal. While I was growing up, Van Johnson was the model GI in all of his movies, as he is in this. I liked the entire cast in this movie. I think one of the best scenes was the Christmas gathering with the Chaplin. His "Was this trip necessary?" speech was one of the high points of the movie for me then and now. This movie, along with "Band of Brothers" are a must see.
56 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
impressive war movie from MGM
didi-525 May 2004
MGM made one of their large studios into a freezing, war-torn hell, and let many of their young stars loose within it for this staggeringly realistic dramatisation on the Battle of the Bulge. As war movies go, this one does everything but pile on the glamour; these boys really did have to do some serious acting!

The cast is headed by a surprisingly good Van Johnson, proving he can do more than just romances, musicals, and various takes on 'the boy next door'. With him are some impressive co-stars: Ricardo Montalban, George Murphy, and John Hodiak the most memorable; also James Whitmore, Don Taylor, and Leon Ames.

This movie is more than just boy's own stuff; there is a genuine story here and you do care about the characters and what happens to them. It all seems so hopeless and yet you want to keep on watching. This production caused a lot of friction at MGM as Mayer really didn't approve of the starkness of it all in the midst of his family pictures. He was wrong, 'Battleground' is one of the studio's best.
48 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great war movie
JurijFedorov27 April 2022
Nazi Germany had a lot of very successful battles with great tactics, bravery, and forceful attacks. That's what kept them going this long. Battle of the Bulge was one such long battle. Germany was already properly defeated and were totally outnumbered. The Allies had total air superiority meaning that by then the plan was just to walk into Germany and take it with minimal resistance. At least the higher ups had this plan. Similar to what they did in Operation Market Garden which also was a giant fiasco. Just full attack because "Germans are already defeated". Of course these plans only work in perfect conditions. Here the Germans were mounting one final attack on the Allied forces with huge success. Unbelievable success for this stage of the war. Attack full force and break thin Allied lines during a cold winter where transportation of tanks and fuel was hard. Basically, Allies took too much ground and had too few men and too few tanks to hold it.. In perfect weather that would be just about possible. Instead a heavy fog made it possible for Germans to attack where they wanted. Of course once the weather improved Allied could bomb the Germans to hell. But again, you have to wait for it. And this movie is about this wait.

A unit settles down in a forest. Digs holes and just tries to not let any Germans through. We see them being punched about for one and a half hour. Many die or get injured as this actually happened. The dialogue is amazing. Instead of modernized gloomy dialogue we get real military talk. Plenty of insider jokes, clever statements, mocking, silly gags, men talking about women and Paris. The dialogue is the movie - amazing. You really can't compare any modern TV show or movie to this. They all get it wrong today. It needs to be this kinda joke or weird event where everyone feels lost and weird. War is not an action movie and is not an event where everything turns grey or black either. Modern movies get it completely wrong. Soldiers are young men. Young men are silly beings.

So it's real war and a great war movie for men about men. But there are some bad points to it. Not having color is a huge issue as it's set in a forest. So you kinda feel like you are in a set. At times the scenes feel real, but color could have added depth to everything and made it feel like a real event. The acting was also wooded in many aspects as you'd expect from this period in Hollywood. And then they couldn't show sex, kissing, bad guys winning. Especially them not being able to show proper romantic relationships breaks a few scenes. There is an attractive French speaking mom who one soldier is flirting with. But it's so badly done. We never quite understand where he is getting as they can't show them being a couple or even directly flirting. So it becomes this weird fake flirting that feels out of place. The violence, as always with Hollywood, is of course on point. I did miss bigger sets and more tanks and trucks. They at times shows real WW2 shots of battle scenes when they needed to show large events. And you could feel that the budget and technology didn't really allow for great tank battles or huge sets which is a shame. But the movie does what it needs to do to still feel real enough despite the lack of colors, small sets, wooden acting, and some things they can't show.

Great movie! But as it is realistic is lacks a proper protagonist and clear story. You feel like you didn't miss anything which doesn't really make you want to rewatch it. It's just war shown in a proper way. And this is a real event so you know what happened which makes it extra fascinating.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An accurate and fantastic film without too much gore.
NativeTexan24 January 2003
This is my favorite film about the Battle of the Bulge. The characters are absolutely real, and the story and screenplay are the actual experience of Robert Pirosh who was a member of the 101st Airborne and also the author and screenwriter of the film. Without getting lost in blood and gore, you nonetheless understand the death and carnage going on all around, and you feel you actually know these men. Robert Pirosh and Director William Wellman manage to bring the celebrated American sense of ironic humor to the film. That sense of humor, graveyard though it be, is one of the things that helps us, as Americans, get through times like those, and like these.

Most touching scene: The utter sadness when Pvt. Layton learns that his buddy, Pvt. Hooper, was killed by a mortar shell. William Wellman filmed Marshall Thompson from the back. The fall of his shoulders and head when they said "We didn't even find his dogtags" is an eloquence beyond words.

Most memorable repeated phrase: Pvt. Holley's "Oh, no!"
34 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A fairly decent war film with exciting battle sequences about Battle of the Bulge and solid acting
ma-cortes2 August 2020
An unglamorous portrait of The Battle of the Bulge, also known as the Ardennes Counteroffensive, the "Bulge" was the largest and bloodiest single battle fought by the United States in World War II and the third-deadliest campaign in American history.It was launched through the densely forested Ardennes region of Wallonia in eastern Belgium, northeast France, and Luxembourg, towards the end of the war in Europe. The offensive was intended to stop Allied use of the Belgian port of Antwerp and to split the Allied lines, allowing the Germans to encircle and destroy four Allied armies and force the Western Allies to negotiate a peace treaty in the Axis powers' favor. The Germans achieved a total surprise attack on the morning of 16 December 1944, due to a combination of Allied overconfidence, preoccupation with Allied offensive plans, and poor aerial reconnaissance due to bad weather.

Serious War movie centred on a platoon virtually lost in a blanket of fog in the harsh Ardennes winter , being compellingly recreated on the back lot . Wartime buffs will appeal this vivid action film in which American troops fighting against enormous odds towards the end of WWWII . At the beginning there's a strong vein of humor and subsequently happen the dramatic scenes . Filmmaker loses no chance to make true human beings out of the roles on the battlefield . Packing a talented main and support cast as Van Johnson , John Hodiak , Ricardo Montalban , George Murphy, Marshall Thompson, Jerome Courtland , Don Taylor , James Whitmore , Douglas Fowley, Leon Ames , Neville Brand , James Arness and Richard Jaeckel .

The actual deeds happened in the following way : Battle of Bulge was the last major German offensive campaign on the Western Front during World War II, and took place from 16 December 1944 to 25 January 1945 . American forces bore the brunt of the attack and incurred their highest casualties of any operation during the war. The battle also severely depleted Germany's armored forces, and they were largely unable to replace them. German personnel and, later, Luftwaffe aircraft also sustained heavy losses. The Germans had attacked a weakly defended section of the Allied line, taking advantage of heavily overcast weather conditions that grounded the Allies' overwhelmingly superior air forces.Fierce resistance on the northern shoulder of the offensive, around Elsenborn Ridge, and in the south, around Bastogne, blocked German access to key roads to the northwest and west that they counted on for success. Columns of armor and infantry that were supposed to advance along parallel routes found themselves on the same roads. This, and terrain that favored the defenders, threw the German advance behind schedule and allowed the Allies to reinforce the thinly placed troops. The farthest west the offensive reached was the village of Foy-Nôtre-Dame, south east of Dinant, being stopped by the U.S. 2nd Armored Division on 24 December 1944 .Improved weather conditions from around 24 December permitted air attacks on German forces and supply lines, which sealed the failure of the offensive. On 26 December the lead element of Patton's U.S. Third Army reached Bastogne from the south, ending the siege. The Germans' initial attack involved 410,000 men; just over 1,400 tanks, tank destroyers, and assault guns; 2,600 artillery pieces; 1,600 anti-tank guns; and over 1,000 combat aircraft, as well as large numbers of other armored fighting vehicles (AFVs).These were reinforced a couple of weeks later, bringing the offensive's total strength to around 450,000 troops, and 1,500 tanks and assault guns. Between 63,222 and 98,000 of these men were killed, missing, wounded in action, or captured. For the Americans, out of a peak of 610,000 troops, 89,000 became casualties out of which some 19,000 were killed.Although the offensive was effectively broken by 27 December, when the trapped units of 2nd Panzer Division made two break-out attempts with only partial success, the battle continued for another month before the front line was effectively restored to its position prior to the attack. In the wake of the defeat, many experienced German units were left severely depleted of men and equipment, as survivors retreated to the defenses of the Siegfried Line.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The right feel in most ways
ridgebottom30 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
"BATTLEGROUND" has the right feel in most ways. The constant pictures of limping soldiers with their feet wrapped in makeshift boot warmers, the generally haggard and scruffy look of the men, the old woman foraging for food at the trash can, even the white parkas pilfered from German dead remind us of the constant struggles the soldiers and citizens at Bastogne faced in December of 1944. And that doesn't even take into account the thousands of guys waiting in the woods to kill you. But every WWII movie has the combat scenes. It's these non-combat scenes that make BATTLEGROUND a special movie. Its ambiance is as thick as the fog that enveloped Bastogne.

My one gripe with most WWII movies made before THE BIG RED ONE is the age of the actors playing the combatants. Look at it this way, of the six servicemen who raised the flag at Iwo Jima, Mike Strank was the "old man." He was 24. I'm not sure if it was Hollywood's desire to get name stars and character actors with experience, or reluctance to display the horrible truth that most of the combatants were only a few years older than the kids roaming the halls of the local high school.

***Spoiler section*** I loved...

when Holley (Van Johnson) attempted to flee a battle and people followed him into perfect ambush position.

The boots at the edge of the foxhole.

The soldier wordlessly gathering the propaganda leaflets and our certainty of what he was heading into the woods to use them for.

Richard Jaekel, fighting to figure out a way out of combat to his very last breath. There was no safe harbor in Bastogne.

The wounded and their nurse in terror as the shells rained down around the barn.

The relative accuracy of the discussion between the colonel and the German envoy. Every account I've read has the German asking if MCAuliffe's response of "NUTS!" is "negative" or "positive." and the Americans telling him it is decidedly negative.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A pretty good vintage war film
sme_no_densetsu10 August 2009
"Battleground" tells the story of the 'battered bastards of Bastogne'. These were the U.S. troops who held the besieged Belgian town of Bastogne in the middle of WWII's Battle of the Bulge. While the squad featured here is fictional the film was nevertheless lauded for it's accuracy in portraying the soldiers and their experiences.

Those familiar with the excellent mini-series "Band of Brothers" will already know something of the siege of Bastogne. I think that it would be unfair to compare "Battleground" to the two Bastogne-based "Band of Brothers" episodes but the film does provide an interesting counterpoint. Unfortunately, while the film was highly regarded in its own time due to its truthful depiction of U.S. soldiers, that approach has become so ingrained in war films since then that it is easy to take it for granted.

The cast is a decent one and includes a few familiar faces. James Whitmore landed a Best Supporting Actor Oscar nomination (and a Golden Globe win) but I don't think that I would single anyone out. In my mind, the cast is best appreciated as an ensemble.

The screenplay and cinematography were both rewarded with Oscars but I didn't really see anything particularly special about either. William A. Wellman also managed to snag a Best Director Oscar nomination for his workmanlike efforts. Rounding out the nominations were ones for editing and Best Picture. Enough to make it clear that the film shows considerable attention to detail in all areas.

In the end, I mainly recommend this film for "Band of Brothers" fans interested in another interpretation of the siege of Bastogne. The film remains an important milestone in WWII films but I would hesitate to include it in the upper echelon of war films.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This Trip Was Necessary
bkoganbing25 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Who knew in mid December of 1944 that Nazi Germany still had enough left for a nasty counter-punch that became known as the Battle of the Bulge.

Though a movie with that name was later made, this one is the real deal about the most known incident in that battle, the defense of the town of Bastogne by the United States 101st Airborne Division.

Taking advantage of the weather with a pea soup fog that rendered Allied air superiority null and void, Hitler found a weak spot in the American line and launched a counterattack that split the army groups commanded by Montgomery and Hodges with that of Patton and came perilously close to recapturing the strategic port of Antwerp. Had it been successful it is very probable that the Allies would have had to negotiate an armistice that would have left the Nazis in charge of Germany.

In that counterattack the strategic town of Bastogne which commanded a junction of several different highways became surrounded with the 101st Airborne Division holding it. Battleground explains this quite clearly and shows in graphic detail what these men had to endure, the cold, the snow, the lack of food and ammunition and medical supplies for the wounded. As the Duke of Wellington said about the Battle of Waterloo, the defense of Bastogne was a mighty close run thing.

MGM put together a fine group of their contract players to show the various types of soldiers who made up a company of the defenders of Bastogne from the 101st. No MGM war film could be done without Van Johnson and he headed a group that was impeccably cast like, Ricardo Montalban, George Murphy, John Hodiak, Marshall Thompson, Douglas Fowley, James Whitmore, Don Taylor, and Bruce Cowling. My favorite in the film however is Leon Ames in a short, but telling role as an army chaplain, conducting some impromptu Christmas services in the field, explaining why their presence in Bastogne and this trip to Europe for the greatest generation was necessary.

William Wellman who as a young man volunteered to make a previous trip to Europe in the last World War directed this film impeccably with a sharp eye for visual detail and the language and idiom of our GIs.

My uncle who turns 88 this year and will be celebrating a 60th wedding anniversary in September with his wife of the same age was part of the relief that rushed to Bastogne as depicted in that other war film classic, Patton. My mother was his younger sister who worked after school in the Bausch&Lomb factory in Rochester which was converted to war use back in the day. It is to both of them, members of America's greatest generation that this review is reverently dedicated to.
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Quality War Film
ReelCheese26 May 2006
Well-made black and whiter tells the story of the Second World War's famous Battle of the Bulge with an emphasis on characterization. Up against a powerful German army, a colorful group of underdog American GI's find it in themselves to do what it takes to survive and secure victory. The film is rare in that it depicts both the senselessness and purpose of battle through all its twists and turns and bouts of boredom and terror. Something Battleground is not is feel-good propaganda. The heroes are real men filled with fear, not unemotional caricatures. That said, the audience is never really able to get to know the many characters in the alloted time frame, and the film at times moves slowly.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Could you spot the Germans?
AAdaSC31 August 2013
This film doesn't quite shift up a gear into 'war classic' category as the audience don't really feel any emotional connection when people start getting killed. The film holds the interest whilst you watch and it's fairly entertaining but there's a bit too much comedy for my liking and some of the characters are irritating. For example, Ricardo Montalban (Roderigues) keeps shouting all the time - he should keep quiet in a war situation with the enemy all around. What a douche-bag! The Texas boy, Jerome Courtland (Abner) uses corny language and repeatedly sings a corny song– he's obviously been told to play a stereo-typical country simpleton. There is also not enough action given that the film is 2 hours long.

There are some nice looking scenes in the foggy forests and the film should have used this to better effect as we are encouraged to wait for the mist to clear to see what is going on. It does happen but it could have happened on more occasions to crank up the tension.

Characters go through changes and by the end of the film, the fresh faced wise-cracking troops are dishevelled. There is some man-to man combat as 3 of the troop go on a scouting mission and it is nicely directed as all violent killings are carried out just outside of our vision, so the film scores for good direction during this part.

Strangely, I find that the memory of this film is better than the experience of actually watching it. Maybe it's worth a second viewing.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Classic WWII Movie!
mrcaw1227 April 2004
Battleground (1949) - Director: William A. Wellman A couple of years had passed since the end of the war and Americans were once again ready for another "Give em Hell Harry" approach so MGM took a few of its current heart throbs (Van Johnson, John Hodiak, Ricardo Montalban), surrounded them with plenty of scraggy-faced character actors and accidentally turned out one of the best WW II movies out there.

Basically the story revolves around a squad of the 101st Airborne Division being trapped in the besieged city of Bastogne during the Battle of the Bulge. Much credit must be given to notoriously brass-balled director William Wellman. Wellman was famous for being a take-no-prisoners kind of guy and must have bullied the soft as silk MGM-ers into getting the kind of picture he wanted, or else. Among other things, the film is famous for its realistic looking (for the time) winter scenes. Surprisingly the entire movie was shot on the backlot and sound stages. (B&W)
25 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Terrific Classic About WWII
brownsfan33724 January 2009
I watched this movie all the time with my Grandpa growing up. He was a vet of the US Army in the Pacific and he told me that this was the only movie where a M-1 rifle and artillery actually sounded real. That is because both were the real sounds they made. The artillery was actually recorded during the war and used in the film.

The characters you can connect with. The circumstances were anything but ideal to fight a war in. You see Layton grow into a vet before your eyes. You see men scared, terrified, and there for each other. Until "Band of Brothers" came out this was my favorite flick about WWII, and it's definitely the best of the "old school" war movies.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The best movie about World War II
Cthulhu-720 February 2003
This is the best movie ever made about a democratic society going to war against fascism. The movie perfectly captures the fear and courage of American soldiers in war, fighting not to conquer like the Germans or destroy civilization like the terrorists, but to defend their fellow man. There's no sunshine patriotism in this movie. No flag waving or false heroics. But the lofty ideas behind the nation that made men such as these is there hidden like the sun behind fog and clouds. And at the end, the glory embodied in the men blazes true and shines as brightly as the sun when the weather lifts.
43 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Battleground
henry8-34 August 2021
A group of soldiers must dig in to defend Bastogne during the Battle of the Bulge, hampered by appalling cold weather and a thick fog making allied help impossible.

Convincing WWII drama / action film which focusses on the individual characters, allowing you to get to know them well and seeing them in realistic settings and battle sequences such that it looks almost documentary like in many places (some documentary footage is used as well). The cast are fine and on the whole, cliche and sentimentality are given a wide berth, with the characters committed to getting the job done, but hating what they do and being ready to run never far from their thoughts. The portrayal of battle here is quite brutal for 1949 and In fact overall the film seems quite modern in tone - like Peckinpah without the viscera.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent, redeeming film from Wild Bill Wellman
tentender30 January 2009
I didn't expect much of this -- I was wrong. Wellman rates pretty low on the Andrew Sarris "auteur" scale, and, frankly, most of his movies are pretty dull fare (ever watch "Blood Alley" or, despite its reputation, "Nothing Sacred"?). But this is a first-rate war film, as gripping as Walsh's "Battle Cry" or "Objective: Burma," or Dwan's "Sands of Iwo Jima." The cast could not be bettered, with outstanding work from Van Johnson, James Whitmore, John Hodiak, Marshall Thompson, Jerome Courtland, Ricardo Montalban, Douglas Fowley. It doesn't have the breadth of the three above-mentioned films -- there are no away-from-the-battlefield scenes that give the characters more dimension -- some might say "dilute the intensity" -- but "Battleground" is very intense and involving. Astonishing that it was made entirely on an MGM sound stage.
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Ensemble Cast
kenjha26 December 2012
During the Battle of the Bulge, an American squadron is trapped in a small French town, fighting not only the Nazis but also the elements of a brutal winter. The focus is more on characters than on action, and it is interesting to watch the interactions among the colorful characters played by a large cast of familiar faces. While the battlefield scenes are mostly effective, the film runs out of steam about two-thirds of the way through and bogs down in the latter stages. While the acting is good by the ensemble, particularly effective are Montalban, Thompson, Whitmore, and Hodiak, an actor who died too young. Playing a wise guy, Johnson provides most of the comic relief.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A little sugar coating, but also the ugliness of war freshly seen, post WWII.
secondtake13 May 2010
Battleground (1949)

It's tough to appreciate the horrors of any war, but I think it gets especially rough to know the ugliness at times of even the best soldiers, the desperation to survive, the egoism of being a hero or of pretending to be one, the utter weariness. Very little of this appears in WWII films made during or shortly after the war. You get grittier aspects in later films like The Big Red One or even Saving Private Ryan, but this one, Battleground, is somewhere between idealizing and the truth. In 1949, people were still coming to terms with what they lost, in lives and sanity and normalcy, and Battleground was a huge (and popular) step toward giving more truth to the soldiers and their sometimes cowardice.

This is one of the better films of the period, no question, but you have to watch with a small amount of adjustment to the facts--even when the destruction, screaming, death, cold, and sadness is totally palpable. It starts a little lighthearted and corny, even, but as conditions decline, realism climbs. It's terrifying even when the soldiers come off a little bit innocent and sweet. That sweetness is too often squashed and killed, literally, to make light of it. In fact, it's partly the contrasts that make both sides of the story clear.

William Wellman is one of the best of his kind, a Hollywood top notcher with a handful of great films to his credit. He, like William Wyler (even more legendary), never developed a style or characteristic subject matter to make their films even slightly "theirs." Which is fine, especially in a movie like this, where it's the events that we care about. For those who know their war history, the battle for Bastogne is one of the heroic moments in the Belgian part of the fight. The sheer firepower of the planes, the gritty step by step persistence of the footsoldiers, the heavy snow and heavier fog, it all wears heavily whether winning or losing. The costs are made so clear all around. This is one small part of the famous Battle of the Bulge, and it was Patton who eventually came to the aid of the soldiers in Bastogne.

It won Oscars for writing and cinematography (easy to see why the camera-work won, for sure). It was shot on the west coast (coming in under budget), and helped MGM make good money.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
There's a reason why it's 'forgotten'
Better_Sith_Than_Sorry23 March 2017
Many reviews here mention the seeming tragedy that this film has been 'forgotten' or 'underappreciated' by the public...and I have to say...'it's forgotten for a reason'...and the reason is, it's just not that good. As another reviewer mentioned, there is much discussion in the film about frivolous things like homemade pie, the token southern guy with the twang/accent and various minutia from the home front. And....that's about 90% of this colossal bore. It's one thing to develop the characters, it's another to devote the entire film to said 'development' (which, I have to say, was ineffective anyway. Who really cares about the guy constantly chattering with his false teeth? This is supposed to be funny? Try tedious and juvenile).

"Battleground" trades as a war film (read the film's title again), but it's as much a war film as "Macbeth" is a murder mystery. It's not a war film. It's more like "A day in the life" drama that happens to be set in Bastogne in December '44. And they picked a rather sappy group of schleps to profile, unfortunately. I found almost none of these characters interesting in the least; no heroes, no villains, almost no one with whom I can relate, or even sympathize; just a bunch of lackluster stiffs. The character played by Ricardo Montalban was really the only one I found to be genuine, personable or relatable.

The film won an Oscar for B&W cinematography, which was quite good I have to say. But did anyone else notice the 'snow' often looked more like white sand than it did snow? As this was filmed on a sound stage, I'm sure it was sand. Anyone who has walked in both snow and sand knows the difference in textures, and this was not snow. Also, if it is so bitterly cold, where is the condensation when the men breathe? It was not there, for the scenes either indoors or out, which gives the film another serious hit on the 'realism' front.

The film is not all bad, it has some moments. It reminded me of "Destination Tokyo," another 'war film' heavy on character development at the expense of plot that bordered on criminal. And like "Tokyo," it's not terrible but it's certainly not memorable. I can safely put it on the 'don't care to ever see this again' list. 6/10.
12 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Superb WW2 drama
grantss30 March 2018
The Battle Of The Bulge, December 1944. The US 101st Airborne Division are holding the strategically vital town of Bastogne against overwhelming odds. We follow a squad of soldiers of the 101st as they battle the Germans, the elements and lack of supplies, equipment and ammunition.

Superb WW2 drama. Very gritty and realistic - no gung ho heroics, no Hollywoodisms. Quite novel for its time in that most movies were still very much in WW2 propaganda mode.

Great work by Van Johnson in the lead role. Good supporting performances. James Whitmore got a Best Supporting Actor Oscar nomination for his efforts.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Average potboiler, good for 1949
antimatter3320 March 2019
..but sadly dated. There wasn't much competition in 1949 because WW-2 era films tended to be frankly jingoistic stinkers like "Sands of Iwo Jima" and "Flying Tigers". So in a sense this movie is groundbreaking in attempting to show the drudgery and tedium mixed with terror and panic that is the life of a beset infantryman. However, the film goes overboard in lame attempts at characterization. That becomes wearisome fast, as the dialog is insipid and the characters, for the most part, completely uninteresting. The exceptions are James Whitmore as the grizzled sergeant and John Hodiak as the thoughtful intellectual. The guy with the chattering false teeth? Well he would have been 4-F so thankfully such a soldier was never around to pester his comrades! Of course there are the usual stereotypes (this is one of the films that set the molds for them) - the naive Mr. Happy who dies, the vanilla replacement who comes to be accepted by the platoon, the smooth operator with a heart of gold, the fast-talking city-slicker.. It gets old fast.

As history, this film is NOT about the Battle of the Bulge as such, and it would not be possible to make a single film about that battle. It is about the defense of Bastogne, which in truth was more a rear-guard action performed while the disorganized Allied forces regained their grip on the Ardennes sector. This phase of the battle was very short lived and accounted for only a small percentage of the final casualty count - in the end, the highest of any battle in the European Theater for the Americans. Most of the actual battle consisted of a grinding war of attrition fought over the next month, really an artillery duel, in awful weather, to push the Germans back to their start line, performed mostly by green conscripts with no previous combat experience. Somehow the PR department of the 101st Airborne Division has managed to take credit for winning the battle outright (not only in this film, they have made a career of it), even to the point of omitting the salient fact that it was not the sunshine, but Patton's 3rd Army, which was their savior. I find this sort of thing irritating. You don't need to be scrupulously accurate, but you do need to at least pay lip service to history.

So what's my final thought? I like the good parts enough to enjoy them on multiple viewings. James Whitmore could make a cat video and it would be great. He steals the final scene and totally redeems the film. So it's worth seeing, but the ecstatic reviews seen here are, well, exaggerated. It's a lot better than "Sands of Iwo Jima". So is "Pink Flamingos".
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wow, A Boring War Movie
ccthemovieman-11 December 2006
This is just plain boring. I don't know how else to say it. A boring war movie? Yup, they did make a few of 'em back in the classic era. You would think it would be to make, but the filmmakers certainly accomplished that "feat" here. It's not just dull; it's too long, too.

Even though most of the characters are good guys, they aren't particularly people that you care about, and their dialog is simply insipid.

The only good aspect of this film was some of the camera-work with the snow and foggy scenery. That was interesting to view at times. It also has an impressive cast but what good was it when all they did was put you to sleep?

This was a film that was up for six Oscars. That is amazing. Don't be fooled by that, especially you guys looking for an intense World War II movie.
20 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed