Captive Women (1952)

Calificación de los usuarios:

5.7/10   

Director:

Stuart Gilmore

Escritores:

Jack Pollexfen (writer)
Aubrey Wisberg (writer)

Fecha de Lanzamiento:

10 octubre 1952 (USA)

Género:

Ciencia-Ficción

Plot:

In a post-apocalyptic New York City, three tribes of mutants (the Norms, the Mutates and the Upriver people) battle each other to survive. |

Plot Keywords:

Mutant | New York | Tribe | Nuclear War | 3000s

Comentarios de los usuarios:

Film is of interest for what was at the time, a novel premise.

Reparto

Ron Randell	...	Riddon
Margaret Field	...	Ruth
Stuart Randall	...	Gordon
Robert Clarke	...	Robert
William Schallert	...	Carver
Robert Bice	...	Bram
Gloria Saunders	...	Catherine
Paula Dorety	...	First Captive
Chili Williams	...	Second Captive
Eric Colmar	...	Sabron
Douglas Evans	...	Jason

También conocida como:

1000 Years from Now (USA) (reissue title)
3000 A.D. (UK)

Duración:

64 min

País:

USA

Idioma:

Inglés

Color:

Negro y Blanco

Relación de Aspecto:

1.37 : 1

Sonido:

Mono

Compañía:

Albert Zugsmith Productions

Trivialidades:

Actors Robert Clarke (Rob) and Ron Randell (Riddon) both died the same day -- 11 June 2005 -- 53 years after co-starring in the lead roles in Captive Women (1952).

Errores:

Continuidad: When the Mutates raid the Norm caves to seize women, the first captive they take is Ruth, who has been imprisoned in a cage and is wearing a long, flowing white dress. But when the Mutates are seen a short time later leading the group of captured women back to their land, Ruth is suddenly wearing a shorter dress of a completely different style and obviously darker color. Since the Mutates were doing battle with the Up River Men while they were kidnapping the women, it is highly unlikely Ruth would have been given time to change clothes before leaving the caves.

Film is of interest for what was at the time, a novel premise.

As I have stated elsewhere in this forum, film firsts should be noted and applauded even if the films they appear in are otherwise unremarkable. The vaguely titled CAPTIVE WOMEN is set in a post nuclear holocaust world where three warring tribes, "The Norms", "The Mutates", and "The Upriver People" battle each other for supremacy in and around the ruins of New York City and its environs in the year 3000. CAPTIVE WOMEN is the first film about the long term effects of nuclear war and how a nuclear war would drastically alter human society. ROCKET SHIP XM (1950) touched on this slightly, with it's nuclear war destroyed Mars and it's remaining Martians reduced to savage cavemen. In 1951 there was FIVE, but all that happened in that film was that a nuclear war reduced the number of people down to five. The plot of a nuclear war resulting in mankind being reduced to warring tribes turns up often in many later post nuclear war films, so often that it has become a cliche. Think of MAD MAX and its countless sequels and imitations. This plot was first introduced here.

However, the premise, new to films at the time, is really the only main point of interest. This story of warring tribes is rather slow going, even at a scant 64 mins. The cast looks want of direction, and most of the performances are over the top. The film is talky. The dialog is stilted and pretentious. Most of the film seems to take place at night, probably to hide the inadequate sets. The producers of this film also made THE MAN FROM PLANET X the year before on the same budget level as this, and cast some of the same people from that film. However, instead of bringing back Edgar G. Ulmer as director, they hired Stuart Gilmore, who seems to show little signs of pictorial imagination. The only interesting scene is a brief shot of the twisted, destroyed ruins of NYC. The only other point of interest is the presence of a very young Ron Randell as Riddon.

Before this film was purchased by RKO, it was titled 1000 YEARS FROM NOW, and was called 3000 A.D. in England. RKO studio head Howard Hughes dreamed up the title CAPTIVE WOMEN, which to me conjurs up images of some tawdry women in prison film and not a science fiction. Perhaps Howard thought his title had more pizzazz or something.