Calificación de los usuarios:
7.3/10
(785 votes)
Overview
Release Date:
26 octubre 1959 (USA)
más
Frase comercial:
The most talked-about and fought-about film!
Plot:
Bored with her husband, bored with her polo-playing lover, will the middle-aged heroine go away with...
más
|
add synopsis
Awards:
1 win
&
1 nomination
más
Comentarios de los usuarios:
Insipid mess, go get some Bergman
más
Additional Details
También conocida como:
The Lovers (UK) (USA)
Amantes, Los (Argentina) (Chile) (Costa Rica) (Mexico) (Uruguay) (Venezuela) [es]
más
Duración:
Argentina:90 min
Aspect Ratio:
2.35 : 1
más
MOVIEmeter: 
4% since last week
why?
Cosas divertidas
Trivialidades:
After screening this film, Nico Jacobellis, manager of a motion picture theater in Cleveland Heights, Ohio, was charged with and convicted of possessing and exhibiting an obscene film. He appealed all the way to the US Supreme Court, which overturned the convictions, ruling that the film was not obscene. In a concurring opinion, Justice Potter Stewart made his famous pronouncement concerning what was pornography: "I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that." Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 197 (1964) (Stewart, J., concurring).
más
Soundtrack:
Streichsextett No. 1
más
preguntas frecuentes
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
más
Message Boards
Discuss this title with other users on
IMDb message board for Amants, Les (1958)
más
Recommendations
Related Links
This is my first Louis Malle film and I found myself really quite disappointed. One of the other posters says that the theme is about freedom and uncertainty. I would agree with this, but to be blunt a better way to learn about the subject would be to listen to the Brahms' String Sextets without the film.
Jeanne Moreau has been described in this movie as inscrutable, I'd agree with that, in this film we find out absolutely nothing of interest about her character, and I'm left perplexed as to the attraction Bernard had for her (purely libidinous?). The morality of the film is very confusing, certainly we can applaud Jeanne's existential urge to escape from her stifling fling, her marriage, and her Parisienne lifestyle, but the fact that she leaves her daughter behind is execrable. The woodland scenes are intriguing but a bit too contrived. If you want to see films about relationships I would suggest most of the oeuvre of Ingmar Bergman, which is far superior.
All in all a rather insipid, though beautiful, mess. Deserves 7 out of 10 because it is provocative and like all good art, subversive.