Sink the Bismarck! (1960) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
86 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Never forget that you are Nazis!
JamesHitchcock12 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
In May 1941 the mighty German battleship Bismarck, accompanied by the cruiser Prinz Eugen, left her home port in the Baltic on a mission to attack British convoys in the North Atlantic. The two ships were intercepted in the Denmark Strait, between Greenland and Iceland, by the British warships HMS Hood and HMS Prince of Wales. In the ensuing exchange of fire the Hood was sunk, with the loss of all but three of her crew, and the Prince of Wales and the Bismarck were both damaged. The German commander, Admiral Günther Lütjens, therefore decided to return to a port in occupied France so that the Bismarck could be repaired. The ship was, however, pursued across the Atlantic by the Royal Navy, determined to avenge the loss of the Hood and to neutralise the threat which the Bismarck posed to British shipping.

"Sink the Bismarck!" is made in a semi-documentary style, concentrating less upon the actual combatants than upon what have been described as the "unsung back-room planners". (The documentary effect is enhanced by having the American journalist Ed Murrow repeat some of his wartime radio broadcasts from London). The main character, played by Kenneth More, is Captain Jonathan Shepard, the Admiralty's Chief of Operations, responsible for directing the operation from a war room in London. Michael Hordern, playing the Admiral leading the hunt for the Bismarck at sea, has a much smaller role. (Historically this would have been Admiral Sir John Tovey, but his name is never given in the film).

More was one of those actors who had a fairly small range but who was capable of giving some very good performances within it. He specialised in playing calm, imperturbable upper-middle-class Englishmen or Scotsmen, often officers in the armed forces. (He could often look out of his depth when he tried to go too far outside this range). Here, however, he is excellent. Shepard is a fictitious character; the film- makers insisted in the closing credits that he was not to be identified with Captain Ralph Edwards, the real Chief of Operations during this period. More plays him as, outwardly, a typical stiff-upper-lip Briton of the era, but one who beneath his calm façade is hiding his own personal traumas. His work is physically less dangerous than service at sea would be, yet nevertheless extremely stressful emotionally; one of Shepard's colleagues, unable to cope with the strain, has announced that he will resign his job in the operations room to take up a position as commander of a naval vessel.

In some ways the film is very accurate; the battle scenes were shot using scale models of the actual ships involved. There are a number of historical inaccuracies, but I suspect that these are not "goofs" in the sense of inadvertent errors made through carelessness but deliberate departures from historical fact for the sake of dramatic licence. During the chase the Bismarck sinks a destroyer named HMS Solent; no British destroyers were lost in the battle, and although there was an "HMS Solent" during the war it was a submarine, not a destroyer. A Fairey Swordfish torpedo bomber from the aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal is shot down, although no aircraft were lost in the actual battle. Both these details were added to increase dramatic tension; one of the crew of the bomber is Shepard's son Tom, and his father must endure an agonising wait for news of his son.

Perhaps the greatest departure from historical reality concerns the character of Admiral Lütjens. Karel Štěpánek plays him as a fanatical Nazi, arrogant and absurdly overconfident. (Peter Finch had given a much more sympathetic portrayal of a senior German naval officer in "Battle of the River Plate" four years earlier). He barks at his crew "Never forget that you are Nazis!"; a real Nazi would probably have said "Never forget that you are National Socialists!" but the truth is that the real Lütjens was not a Nazi at all. He disliked the regime for which he was fighting and, contrary to the way he is portrayed here, was very pessimistic about the Bismarck's chance of success. Yet in the context of the film Štěpánek's performance is a good one, increasing the dramatic contrast between Lütjens and Shepard, both more cautious and more humane.

Patriotic wartime epics, often based upon true stories, were popular in the British cinema during the fifties and sixties, so it is not surprising that the hunt for the Bismarck should have furnished the material for a how-we-won-the-war film. Compared to the high emotions of something like "The Dambusters", perhaps the greatest true story war film, it can at times seem rather cool, yet it is still undoubtedly one of Britain's better efforts in the genre, due particularly to More's efforts. 7/10
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fine war film
Panamint13 February 2015
A distinguished wide-screen film that honors those who served in a great British naval episode while showing generally how naval warfare was carried out in the early days of WWII.

Effectively portraying the sheer power of one of the most monstrous weapons ever devised by the dark side of the human mind- the battleship Bismarck. Battleships had a hideous, graceful sort of massive beauty during their brief heyday at the peak of war technology but went the way of the dinosaur after WWII. Their vulnerabilities are demonstrated in this film, as are certain unfortunate (but not necessarily erroneous) tactical moves by the German Admiral and the Captain of the Bismarck.

In case you don't know the story I won't spoil it but an event occurs around the middle of this film that has a sudden awesome shock value that can still cause your jaw to drop. It is perfectly set forth despite the low-tech film techniques available in 1960- the producers do a great job.

A deadly serious film about deadly serious heavy subject matter, "Sink the Bismarck" has qualities that hold up and it is worth your viewing time.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Gripping wartime British naval drama
roghache28 May 2006
This movie is a well crafted and gripping depiction of British attempts to locate and destroy the German battleship Bismarck during World War II. It is told from the viewpoint of sailors aboard vessels from both sides and also the British naval command headquarters. I have little knowledge of naval history so am in no position to comment regarding historical accuracy.

Personally, I found most compelling the strategy and tension within the Admiralty War Headquarters in London, especially the personal depiction of the coordinator of this operation. Kenneth More convincingly plays Captain Jonathan Shepard, who lost his own wife earlier in an air raid and has a son who is himself a naval pilot involved in the battle to sink the Bismarck. Shepard's relationship with the lovely but very professional female naval officer Davis is well captured. There is also a moving portrait of Shepard's restrained response to unfolding news regarding his son. Though there is engaging battle drama at sea, it's the character portrayal of this stiff upper lip British officer that made the movie for me.
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well done . . . with a major flaw
jacksflicks2 August 2002
The British have made war and historical movies with an unrivaled consistency of quality, and Sink the Bismarck is no exception. The details are meticulous, the casting first-rate (except for a hokey voice-impersonation of Churchill), and the battle sequences marked by accuracy and fine special effects.

This otherwise fine film is marred, however, by the false depiction of one of the major characters, Admiral Lutjens, commander of the Bismarck. In the film, he is stereotyped as the typical Nazi - a Hitler sycophant, careerist and wild-eyed fanatic. This was most certainly not the historical Lutjens, who was by no means a Nazi fanatic. Lutjens was a naval hero from World War I, who served out of duty and dedication, not Nazi conviction. (Lutjens protected Jews under his command, and members of his family were in trouble for their anti-Nazi views.) This is at complete odds with his depiction in Sink the Bismarck, which I find inexcusable, given that the above information was certainly available to the production. In fact, an accurate depiction of Lutjens would have, in my opinion, added interest to the plot.

Nevertheless, Sink the Bismarck is eminently watchable and a fine addition to any war movie collection, if you bear in mind the above caveat.
117 out of 139 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Admiral Gunther Lutjens Maligned
thomasja55 January 2016
I agree with the other reviewers who complained that Adm. Gunther Lutjens was portrayed as being a pro-Nazi when in actuality, he wasn't. In fact, Lutjens had protested against the dismissal of Jewish officers from the Navy and when Hitler came to visit the Bismarck 2 weeks before her departure, he gave Hitler the navy salute and not the Nazi salute.

Part of the problem with this movie is where 20th Century Fox obtained their material from. They used the material in C.S. Forrester's book "The Last Nine Days of the Bismarck". In that book Forrester had portrayed Lutjens as being pro-Nazi which had 20th Century Fox researched before making the movie, would have uncovered Forrester's mistake (intentional or not). A better book was Ludovic Kennedy's "Pursuit: The Chase and Sinking of the Battleship Bismarck," but I don't believe his book had come out at the time the movie was made. 20th Century Fox should have waited until it did than to base a true event on a possibly biased book.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Fine Story, Well Told with few innacuracies
mikestollov13 October 2003
A lot of people criticise this film for the wooden acting, but this ignores a vital point. In the period the film is set people were a lot more formal, especially in the Royal Navy. Such negative comments are on a par with claims that Shakespearean language is too floral or that George Washington wore a powdered wig. Honestly I cannot accept any such comments. Anyone who's seen the God Awful TV movie, "The Junction Boys" will see much more woodeness.

Charting the maiden voyage of the Nazi battleship's Bizmark & her brief career in the Atlantic, this film lacks modern details now known about this episode due to the efforts of divers, namely information gained from the wreck of the Bizmark itself & investigations of HMS Hood's remains, famously blown into pieces by a hit from Bizmark.

Also not dealt with is some of the rather more subtle facts of this period. Bizmark is touted as "the deadliest warship afloat" but this isn't borne out by the facts. The Bizmark chose it's battles very well, avoiding conflict with Royal Navy warships that could do it actual damage. She was a commerce raider, praying on defenceless merchant ships, less powerful warships & fleeing from anything that could do her harm. The fact that she came up against warships that could actually do damage to her was down to the doggedness of the Royal Navy.

At first she did prevail, but once more due to the opposition she was given. HMS Hood was definitely NOT a good choice for this conflict, she was NOT a Battleship, she was an old, thinly armoured Battle Cruiser & well below the standard of Bizmark, her guns were innacurate & her armour wasn't up to the threat she was faced with. The accompanying battleship Prince of Wales was a brand new warship, with terrific specifications, but was so new she also had teething poblems (her firing control wasn't fully calibrated & some of her guns had problems that prevented them from firing) & even went into battle against the Bizmark with civilian ship builders on board who were still working on her! Hardly surprising then that Bizmark sank Hood & damaged Prince Of Wales badly. None the less between the two of them they hit Bizmark three times, knocking out one of her boilers, puncturing her armour, so she took on water & leaked fuel, a critical turning point in the eventual outcome.

When Bizmark was later damaged by aircraft, robbing her of her rudders, she was unable to run away & finally forced to come up against "KG5" (HMS King George The Fifth) & her support fleet, then the truth was revealed. Bizmark was good, but against the older, less well specified KG5 she lost heavily, with enormous loss of life. Bizmark was good, but in a fight with comparable forces she was nothing special (yes, she was outnumbered, but by very much older ships).

The confususion of this time is clearly shown, as Bizmark circled uncontrolably following the air strike, so meaning that sightings sent to RN HQ mean that at one point she was thought to be heading away from the battle fleet, then towards it.

We do see some emotional manipuilation going on, an effort to either sustain the narative, or arouse hatred in the audience for the enemy so that we are not horrified by the carnage that will soon be unleashed upon them. Royal Navy ships are shown getting sunk that actually didn't even get hit. Also Ark Royal Swordfish aircraft are shown getting shot down, when actually all returned intact (a fascinating fact, the ancient, obsolete Swordfish from the aircraft carrier Ark Royal were all the Fleet Air Arm had. The Germans at the time laughed at the cumbersome, bi-plane torpedo bombers, but they couldn't hit them! Their anti aircraft guns had predicters on them to track incoming aircraft & hit them, but the Swordfish flew so slowly the predicters couldn't compensate & all the shells missed!).

Technical details apart, the naval action is where the movie excels. For the last time British movie makers were allowed access to a Royal Navy Battleship, probably HMS Vanguard, the last RN Big Gun warship. Notice how the scenes in the Bizmark & KG5 gun turrets are identical! Well they weren't going to get this footage from the German Kriegsmarine! However notice that the sailors are shown wearing their white, anti flash covers correctly for once. They should go over the mouth, but rarely do you see this in films.

The acting is superb, considering the period & the generation they came from. Kenneth Moore plays the part of Cpt Joh Sheppard (co ordianting the show down with Bizmark in the London RN HQ) sympathetically, portraying the genuine feelings the RN sailors had for the Nazi sailors who'd lost their lives. (A comment from a sailor of the time "She was the most beautiful ship I'd ever seen & we'd come here to sink her"). Later it was known that the German sailors went throught similar moments after sinking the Hood. The final seconds of the film show Moore reluctantly throwing Bizmark's Atlantic battlefield model into the rubbish. Not covered is the abandoning of the surviving Germans by the Royal Navy. It is claimed that this was revenge for the loss of life on the Hood, where all but 4 were killed. But Lufftwaffe air attacks against the Royal Naval Forces were a genuine threat, as was an attack by German U-Boats who did not hesitate to sink any enemy ship no matter what was going on. Basically not stopping to pick up survivors was Standard Operating Procedure whether they were friend or foe, something that seems to be forgotten by the German survivors. They blame the Royal Navy, but the RN never knew if a U-Boat torpedo was on the way, headed for their valuable ships. It was ultimately the effects of their Nazi Admiral Doenitz's orders, comander of the U-Boat packs, that lead them to be abandoned.

Carl Mohner portrays the Captain of the Bizmark "Lindeman" with an air of professionalism, he isn't seen as a Nazi. He is shown as a good warrior, but not a Fascist. Karl Stepanek as Admiral Lutchens is shown as a slightly arrogant, puffed up Nazi. There is some truth here, but later intelligence releases would explain why Lutchens sent such a long message to Berlin that allowed the British to fix his position so accurately & seal his fate. It wasn't arrogance or a death wish, basically he already believed that he had been located by the RN & so had nothing to lose by breaking radio silence (he was wrong, at that point the RN had no idea where he was). Later historical evidence shows he was rather more complex that a simple Hitler toady.

The final battle scenes avoid the brutal carnage, later comments from surviving German sailors tesitfy to the impact of 16 inch shells from the Royal Navy as they tore the Bizmark to pieces. Basically they describe how the decks were littered with flesh, "like a butchers shop" as one put it, from the crew as they were blown to bits by the Royal Navy shells. Given the hatred the British still had for the Germans in 1960 when this film was made (ask my mother who at the time wept for the loss of the Hood & swore at German air armadas that dropped bombs on her) this ommision isn't a surprise, as is the limits of acceptability at the time.

Also not covered is the end game, where KG5 pounded Bizmark with broadside after broadside. This is one of the reasons that the Bizmark aquired the legend of strength & invicibility. However any naval tactician of the time would have quickly pointed out a fatal flaw in this part of the action. Getting in close & sending 16 inch shells into Bizmark was NOT the way to sink her, the shells would be travelling at a shallow angle & would explode in the upper decks. The proper way to do it is to get further back & send in shots that come in at a plunging angle, exploding deep in the ship. She wasn't invincible, she was simply tortured.

All in all you have to look a very long way to find a similarly finessed work charting Naval Warfare. "Battle of the River Plate", "Midway", "The Cruel Sea" & "Tora! Tora! Tora!" are about the only examples I can think of. Intrigiungly they are also open to the criticisms levelled at acting standard of "Bizmark" but seemingly they don't attract the same. Why this is I don't know.

Avoid the knee jerk reaction concerning the portrayal of the characters involved & you have a deep, fascinating portrayal of one of the most interesting chapters in WW2 Naval History. For similar adventures try the films mentioned above but NOT the fat-head 2001 "Pearl Harbour" remake, which makes me want to puke.
83 out of 116 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"We.ve gotta Sink the Bismarck, all the world depends on us."
bkoganbing12 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
In May 1941 the Royal Navy was stretched to the breaking point. As was accurately pointed out by Laurence Naismith playing the First Sea Lord, they are committed heavily to the battle raging for Greece, to defending the critical base at Malta, and to protecting Atlantic convoys from America. So when Hitler turned loose his newest and biggest battleship, the Bismarck, the Royal Navy had not a whole lot to throw at her.

Sink the Bismarck is done in a documentary style with the action taking place on the high seas in the British ships and on the Bismarck. The other part of the drama takes place at the war room at the Admiralty where the fictitious character Kenneth More, a captain who had his ship shot out from under him by the German commander who is in charge of the Bismarck.

The Bismarck was only out for eight days, but in that time she annihilated the British cruiser Hood with all but 3 lost. After that it was a running battle with both planes from the carrier Ark Royal and ship to ship battles with the Prince of Wales, the George V, and the Dorcestshire before the Bismarck went down in the Atlantic.

There is a side personal drama involving Kenneth More whose son is a flier on board the Ark Royal and who is missing. WREN officer Dana Wynter is around to lend a sympathetic ear and there's a bit of a hint that things might get personal with More and Wynter.

The Ark Royal planes did some damage and I notice that the planes flown off the Ark Royal were ancient biplanes. They did some damage, but didn't sink the Bismarck themselves. Unfortunately some lessons were not learned by the British command and the Prince of Wales and the Repulse were sunk several months later by the Japanese with aerial bombardment when they reported for duty at the British base in Singapore. The British did in fact experiment with carriers as the Ark Royal's contribution in that action and others signifies. I'm willing to bet Mr. Churchill wished he had a few more carriers like the Americans and Japanese did. And I'm also willing to bet he was thanking the Deity the Germans had none.

Two things helped popularize the film in America and it did do well on this side of the Atlantic. I remember a packed house when I went to see it in theater back when I was a lad. One was the presence and narration of Edward R. Murrow who as a correspondent for CBS radio reported to America on the Bismarck story and so many others. His more than FDR's was the voice of World War II for the American public.

The second was that country singer Johnny Horton had a big selling hit also entitled Sink the Bismarck. Though nary a note of it is heard in this film that song on the charts boosted sales to Sink the Bismarck tremendously.

Kind of unusual that an American country singer would choose a British naval action as the subject of a song. But the heroism of all the members of the Royal Navy and even that of the crew of the Bismarck is the stuff legends are made of.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I'm happy that I'm not a naval warfare expert.....
padutchland-16 April 2006
and could just watch and enjoy the movie without analyzing it. That's what movies were originally for - entertainment and enjoyment. I don't know if the special effects were great for the time or not, but they looked enough like the real thing for me. Great naval battle scenes and the acting was perfect for the times portrayed of the 1940's and the real way that military people are mostly low key in planning discussions and carrying out their duties. All very believable scenes with the flavor of the way it really was even in portions that were added to entertain (when history takes a back seat to entertainment). Kenneth More showed his versatility in excelling in such a serious part and Dana Wynter very professional. I don't know why she didn't become a larger name here in the States with such pure beauty, grace and honest acting ability. By coincidence I just saw her in another movie In Love And War where she played a totally different type of part and nailed it great. Anyway, if you haven't seen Sink The Bismarck, then by all means give it a gander. It is time well spent for not only those who enjoy naval movies, but good drama films as well.
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Historical and warlike film about the commanding staff and battles between the Bismarck battleship and British cruisers
ma-cortes12 January 2015
This is an excellent picture dealing with infamous ship including spectacular battle sequences and prestigious main cast helped by a fleet of the best Brit character players . It's one of the last great Brit pictures about warfare naval action and being based on real incidents . British Navy sets out to locate and sink notorious German battleship during WWII in this most stirring account of the quest for the formidable Bismarck . This is the World War II story of the British Navy's effort to defeat Nazi Germany's most powerful warship .

This is a splendid British film concerning historic deeds during WWII , the naval battle in the Atlantic Ocean between German battleship and British squadron of various ships , carriers and airplanes . This picture is based on fact , but there have been complaints that is most inaccurate . Magnificent performances from Kenneth More as the withdrawn officer director operations supported by a beautiful as well as interesting Dana Wynter . The main and secondary cast are stunningly incarnated by a magnificent plethora of English actors such as Michael Hordern , Maurice Denham , Michael Goodliffe , Jack Gwillim , Michael Ripper , Bernard Lee , David Hemmings , Ian Hendry , Laurence Naismith , Geoffrey Keen and Esmond Knight, who plays the captain of the HMS Prince of Wales, actually served as an officer on board her and was injured during the battle.

Excellent scale models , though also utilized actual battle footage ; according to special effects cameraman L.B. Abbott, the miniatures were photographed with spherical , non-anamorphic lenses . This made it easier to force the perspective of the image to make the miniatures appear bigger and further apart. The producers knew that the use of miniatures and explosions would have to look very realistic to be successful , they hired Howard Lydecker, one of the legendary Lydecker brothers who were generally considered to be the best special effects team in the industry and they had spent decades perfecting their craft at Republic Pictures. The film contains an evocative and atmospheric cinematography in black and white by classic cinematographer Christopher Challis who also photographed 'The battle of the River Plata¨. The flick was stunningly directed by Lewis Gilbert . The motion picture will appeal to wartime genre buffs and British classic movie fans . Rating : Better than average .

The film is based on true events , these are the followings : Bismarck and her sister ship Tirpitz were the largest battleships ever built by Germany, and two of the largest built by any European power.In the course of the warship's eight-month career under its sole commanding officer, Capt. Ernst Lindemann, Bismarck conducted only one offensive operation, in May 1941, codenamed Rheinübung. The ship, along with the heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen, was to break into the Atlantic Ocean and raid Allied shipping from North America to Great Britain. The two ships were detected several times off Scandinavia, and British naval units were deployed to block their route. At the Battle of the Denmark Strait, Bismarck engaged and destroyed the battlecruiser HMS Hood, the pride of the Royal Navy, and forced the battleship HMS Prince of Wales to retreat; Bismarck was hit three times and suffered an oil leak from a ruptured tank. The destruction of Hood spurred a relentless pursuit by the Royal Navy involving dozens of warships. Two days later, while heading for the relative safety of occupied France, Bismarck was attacked by obsolescent Fairey Swordfish biplane torpedo bombers from the aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal; one scored a hit that rendered the battleship's steering gear inoperable. In her final battle the following morning, Bismarck was neutralised by a sustained bombardment from a British fleet, was scuttled by her crew, and sank with heavy loss of life. Most experts agree that the battle damage would have caused her to sink eventually. The wreck was located in June 1989 by Robert Ballard, and has since been further surveyed by several other expeditions
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of the best war time epic movie
ebiros214 November 2005
This is a little known war time epic movie that should rank with the likes of "Patton". The story is about the grudge match that's spawned from sinking of battleship Hood by the German battleship Bismark. A full blown search for the German battleship by the British navy takes place to hunt down and sink the Bismark. Acting is first class, and although the special effects have something to be desired by today's standard, movie none the less conveys the tension and excitement of what probably was the greatest and the final naval conflict between battleships. In recent years Bob Ballard and the Oceanographic Institute rediscovered the sunken remains of the battleship Bismark which confirmed the ferocity of the fire power that was exchanged in this naval warfare. This movie gets mentioned by movie producers of today when they sight their seminal influence it had on some of their plot lines, which attests to its production value. The sub plot which unfolds between Kenneth Moore and Dana Wynter is also written superbly. A good war time semi documentary that's worth seeing.
29 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An outdated, although exciting, dramatization
Shaolin_Apu5 March 2007
The fear what many people have about old movies whose topic demands a good depiction of a naval combat will not get a huge disappointment from 'Sink The Bismarck!'. The combat scenes are rather well done and they manage to give you an adequately good picture about what is supposed to be going on at the sea. This means that the ships and aeroplanes really look like themselves and this delightfully successful impression is the best thing you get from this movie.

The actors' part however is only little better than an superimposed commentators voice, it will never be too impressive except for More's performance as Captain Shepard. The characters could have been made somehow little more interesting, but on the other hand there's no over-acting, or over-dramatization either unless you speak of the German Admiral. The Germans' role in this movie is left to be the evil Nazis again about which the Admiral constantly remembers to remind us about. For those people who have seen 'Das Boot' this approach may be mostly nauseating. It is understandable that during the filming it hadn't yet passed too many years from the actual war and people would have associated anything that is German and military as some Nazi thing. But if you can get over it, you'll enjoy this film too.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
'Getting emotional about things is a peacetime luxury!'
Nazi_Fighter_David3 December 1999
Kenneth More plays the severe cold and uncompromising Captain Jonathan Shepard who has lost his wife in an air raid, and whose son is a naval pilot in the warfare against the Bismarck...

'Bismarck' is a super German battleship of World War II that had a short, but spectacular career...

Captain Shepard guides the distinguished campaign from the Admiralty War headquarters in London: The search, the course, the deploy and the destruction of the Bismarck under an archetype that said: 'Getting emotional about things is a peacetime luxury.'

The Bismarck's admiral (Karel Stepanek) is a Nazi officer characterized by emotional instability, presumptuous and overenthusiastic...

Sighted and bombarded by British battleships, the Bismarck is incapacitated and sunk by torpedoes on the morning of May 27, 1941.

Dana Wynter is the likable attractive lady naval officer, fitting in mood and attitude...

In the climax of the film and after the naval epic, Michael Hordern, the Commander-in-Chief of the Home Fleet, turns to his men and says: 'Let's go home, gentlemen!'

This exciting sea battle would have been better on a standard screen than in CinemaScope, as its ships were clearly 'models' using newsreels footage... Nevertheless, the film is an entertaining hunt, with good acting.

Beside the search and eventual sinking of the Bismarck, I would like to mention, that the personal drama of the British sailors increase the intensity of the picture's realism...
31 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining but hugely flawed
ian100031 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Unfortunately I saw this movie as part of a double bill with the earlier "Battle Of The River Plate".

"Bismark" certainly has more action; there are two major naval actions plus the various attacks on Bismark, but "River Plate", made in colour, is the superior film. It's incredible attention to detail (the DCT is shown, and referred too, the bell rings before each salvo, the guns show scorch marks after the battle etc etc) is superb, and puts "Bismark" to shame. The repeated shot in "Bismarck" of an officer shouting "shoot" into a telephone, for example, is hardly credible.

"Bismark" is reasonably accurate historically, though no warships other than "Hood" were lost in the battle.

I fail to see why Tovey was not named in the portrayal - for legal reasons perhaps.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Somewhat accurate
octoberrust6721 October 2019
Clearly the British account and perspective. Bismarck in the final battle was damaged beyond repair. But in the end was scuttled by her crew. Fact! The surviving crew of the Bismarck have testified to this. They have also seen clear evidence of scuttleing when the wreck was found by divers in the modern era. Seems weird this movie has not had a modern remake. It's very old and black and white and grainy. Also full of innacurate German tropes and bias. Sadly boils down to a lot of lost lives.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Excellent movie
thull119 December 2000
For starters, this picture was thankfully filmed in black and white. This is only appropriate for gray colored ships shooting it out in the North Atlantic. The performers were, for the most part, convincing. The movie got a little risky by using a fictional character (played by Kenneth More) for the lead role, and delving a bit into his personal life. But it didn't get out of hand. The movie takes just the right amount of time in developing and depicting the important events in the eight day life of the Bismarck. I got the feeling that I was actually there and watching these events take place. The movie is essentially accurate, based on accounts I have read in books; including one by the highest ranking German survivor. The depiction of the destruction of the British battle cruiser Hood was not exactly accurate, but I would rank that a minor point. Getting the ship used in the movie to blow up the same way the Hood would probably have been more trouble than it was worth. The bottom line is the ship was destroyed and only three crew members survived.

This movie is an excellent, no-nonsense portrayal of the short and dramatic life of the legendary German battleship Bismarck.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
SINK THE BISMARCK! (Lewis Gilbert, 1960) ***
Bunuel197628 June 2006
I had missed this on Italian TV a couple of times in the past and didn't purchase the DVD on account of its lack of substantial supplements. Thankfully, my local DVD outlet added it to his collection and I took this opportunity to finally catch up with yet another classic war film.

A meticulously-detailed reconstruction of the famed German battleship's destruction by the British navy (after this had suffered mightily at its hand), the film was purposely shot in black-and-white - when most war epics were being made in splashy color - in order to insert stock footage of the real battle...even if this was eventually stretched-out to fit the actual movie's widescreen ratio! For this same reason, however, the film tends to lack excitement (outside of its sea battles) given the relentless device of documenting the movements of the various ships on both fronts - which, eventually, becomes quite confusing to keep track of!

That said, the film makes the most of an impressive international cast (led by that ever-reliable personification of the 'stiff upper lip' school, Kenneth More, who has to sort out not only the Germans but a personal dilemma as well!) with enough familiar faces - even if, sometimes, one is hard-pressed to remember their name - to fill out the entire crew of the titular vessel itself!! Karel Stepanek is the German Admiral at the helm of the "Bismarck" blinded as much by the seeming indestructibility of his ship as the vainglorious promises of his beloved Fuehrer, while Edward R. Murrow (brought back to prominence by GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK [2005]) appears intermittently throughout - as himself - to report the latest developments of the seafaring 'chess game'.

The behind-the-scenes crew is, likewise, a who's who of British cinema's Golden Age, each offering his solidly professional contribution. Still, it's quite amazing that director Gilbert was up for the DGA award for his work on this film!
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
" He's as cold as a witch's heart, yet I wish for a man with no heart at all "
thinker169111 January 2009
When making a film like, "Sink The Bismark" it benefits the audience when actual facts of the ship or the events are used in the final cut. This film does just that. It begins with the Christening and launching of the impressive German vessel, Bismark. The massive battleship which could easily cruise at 30 knots became the pride of Germany and quickly proved her military prowess when encountering the H.M.S. Hood. The Hood was the pride of the British Royal Navy with her Captain and select crew of 1,500 men were well seasoned and experienced. Yet on that fateful day of May 24th, 1941 the two ships came within 15 miles of each other. After several exchanged salvos, the Bismark with her compliment of 8 fifteen inch guns completely destroyed the British ship leaving only three survivors. This disastrous event is but one of the exceptional battle scenes, superbly recreated by Howard Lydecker and his special effects crew. To add to the creative storyline are the actors which give this movie a superior realism. Kenneth More as Captain Shepard, who along with his naval staff wage war against the Bismark from their underground command post in war-torn London, where Edward R. Murrow gives the world a blow by blow account of the desperate time. Dana Wynter plays Anne Davis, his able assistant. Carl Möhner is Captain Lindemann, the proud Captain of the Bismark with Karel Stepanek playing his immediate superior, Admiral Lutjens. Laurence Naismith plays the First Sea Lord. This a great film and should honor the Allies who gave so much when the world needed them. ****
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mass product
Philipp_Flersheim21 July 2022
There are some really good British war films (for example 'Ice Cold in Alex', 1958), but 'Sink the Bismarck' never raises above the quality of an ideology-driven mass product. The 1950s had been a bad time for Britain. In 1956, the US forced the country into the humiliating climbdown in Suez, in Kenya it became increasingly clear that even the most brutal measures were insufficient to put down the Mau Mau rebellion, and what remained of the rest of the Empire was on the brink of dissolution. In such a situation, films that reminded the British of past glories were more than welcome, and accordingly British studios were churning them out, thereby shaping the worldview of a whole generation of Britons. 'Sink the Bismarck!' is such a film. It tells the story of how the British admiralty reacted to the entry of the German battleship into the war and how British navy flyers and battleships finally managed to sink their prey. Most of this has been filmed competently enough in a quasi-documentary style. Such a style can work: 'Midway' (1976) is a good example. However, like the producers of 'Midway', those responsible for 'Sink the Bismarck!' evidently felt they had to add 'human interest' to their plot. Here, it is a British captain (Kenneth More) who initally appears as a stuffy martinet but turns out to be a deeply emotional human being. Eventually there is even a hint of a romance with the only female character (Dana Wynter). That does not work. Director Lewis Gilbert should either have focused on this 'human interest' aspect, using the hunt for the Bismarck as no more than a background story, or he should have focused on the hunt for the Bismarck, with no distractions. Another weak point is that the Germans are being portrayed as Nazis throughout. As other reviewers have pointed out, this does not fit. Admiral Günther Lutjens (Karel Stepanek) was no committed Nazi. Moreover, rather than let the Germans speak German (using subtitles for the translation), Gilbert has them talk English with a funny fake German accent. That's jarring. What is even more jarring are false tones: For example Lutjens reminding the Bismarck's crew that they are all 'Nazis'. First, to call someone a Nazi in such a context, that person would have had to be a member of the Nazi-party, and membership never exceeded 10 or 11 per cent of the population (that was towards the end of the war). The crew of the Bismarck were certainly not all Nazis. Second, the Nazis never referred to themselves as 'Nazis' (they considered the contraction derogatory, preferring the full 'national socialists'). Things like this are minor issues but they add up. All in all, I guess 6 stars is generous for a film like this.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This is "The Titanic" of War Movies.
PWNYCNY30 May 2006
In World War Two Nazi Germany launches a battleship that was for its time the most advanced and lethal warship ever built. And as proof of its invincibility, the Bismarck within a matter of minutes sunk and seriously damaged two of Britain's biggest warships. Yet like the Titanic, this ship, this incredible example of technical ingenuity, was doomed to fail, and to fail spectacularly and ingloriously. As the title indicates, this movie is about the sinking of the Bismarck. To reveal how and why this ship failed would be inappropriate here, but this movie does a credible job in explaining why the British became totally obsessed with that one ship and why the British had to destroy that ship at all cost. Watch the movie.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A solid, low-key North Atlantic WWII film
secondtake27 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Sink the Bismark! (1960)

A smart, steady as she goes WWII film in stately, wide screen black and white. There is little to flaw in it, and equally little to lift it above its quiet perfection. I don't mean it's a perfect movie, but that it manages perfectly to hold its tone, from the war rooms to the sea battles, from the English side to the German, with intelligence and historical accuracy.

The terror the large, high tech battleship caused is legendary among those who lived through it. It was a symbol of German military and engineering prowess. When it knocked out (sank) Britain's largest and best ship early in the war, it looked invincible. And the prime minister made a point of saying, in a key early moment, that they had to do whatever it took to sink it. And so risks were taken and more lives lost and until, eventually, it was sunk.

Not to give away the end, but this is history, and war is serious. As a sign of how the movie remains sombre through it all, there was no cheering and really not even a smile among the British when they saw the Bismarck finally go underwater. Which is admirable, the stiff upper lip thing, but it's also a little unbelievable. Indeed, the German boat leaders are constantly shown to be arrogant and cocky, worried more about letters from Hitler than the fact they are leaking oil. I suppose it might be true to some extent, that the British were all good chaps and determined to win and the Germans were all ruthless and tireless and determined also to win.

Such is war.

But this is maybe the largest tilt the film makes in the wrong direction. It is filmed with great control, and it mixes a little existing footage with the new shooting really seamlessly. The acting is first rate, with no heroes in the Hollywood sense, just a large cast of focused talent.

As for accuracy, it seems that scholars find it quite good in the large picture but riddled with little errors, including the portrayal of the German captain as a cocky Hitler worshiper. There is some question about whether the Germans scuttled the ship themselves or if it was sunk, and there was apparently no Norwegian spy involved. Some of the errors have to do with the use of updated ships for the filming, but most of this is too fast to worry about. There is the hinted at turning away after the sinking, without picking up Germans in the water, and apparently the rescue effort was minimal, so a hundred Germans died in the water. Great detail is found at the Wiki entry for the movie (as well as the entry for the ship). Another page to pursue is at www.kbismarck.com.

The main character, Captain Shepard, and his son on a navy ship, are fictional.

The wreck was discovered in 1989 by the same team that discovered the Titanic, and James Cameron made a documentary on the ship (and its wreckage) in 2002.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Solid War Film
gordonl568 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
SINK THE BISMARCK – 1960

Another well made war film from that great 1950 to 1966 era, when more than a few excellent war time films were knocked out. This one tells the tale of the German battleship, Bismarck. Bismarck was the first battleship built by Germany since the First World War. Because of several ocean raids made earlier in the war by GRAF SPEE, SCHARHORST and GNEISENAU. The British were worried that Bismarck could wreak havoc of the Atlantic convoys.

When Bismarck and the cruiser Prinz Eugen, made their break to reach the Atlantic, the Royal Navy sent every ship they could to hunt them down. First honours went to the German Navy, when they sank the star of the R.N. the Hood, and heavily damaged the Prince of Wales.

Later on, Bismarck's luck ran out when a lucky hit with a torpedo dropped by a Swordfish aircraft, damaged her steering gear. Unable to escape the rest of the ships in pursuit, she went to the bottom under a hail of shells and torpedoes. Prinz Eugen escaped and made it to German held France.

The film itself is told from the British headquarters managing the pursuit. Kenneth More plays the officer in charge. He is supported by a slew of British character actors like, Geoffery Keen, Laurence Naismith, Michael Horden and Maurice Denham. Pretty Dana Wynter supplies the female content.

Shot is black and white, the film features some excellent model work, and top notch battle scenes. The director, Lewis Gilbert keeps this one moving at a steady pace with nary a slow moment on screen.

Even 50 plus years after being made, this one stands up very well and is worth a look.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Exciting film
blanche-221 October 2009
"Sink the Bismarck" (1960) tells the story of the British attempts to destroy the pride of the German fleet, the Bismarck, which enjoyed an enviable career at first, but its success was short-lived. The stars are Kenneth More, Dana Wynter, Karel Stepanek, and Laurence Naismith.

I'm no WW II expert as others on this board are, so I won't go into historical facts as presented by this film, except to say that the story was manipulated to present the good guy-bad guy scenario often seen in war films. With films like "Das Boot," we are allowed to see the Germans as human beings, with young men fighting just as our young men did, to defend their country. Here, we have a dedicated Nazi, Admiral Lutjens (Stepanek) as the commander of the Bismarck who wants victory at all costs and seemingly has little concern for his men. At one point, an officer makes a suggestion, which the commander waves off with "I don't care about the sea," and the reply is, "I was thinking of the men." In another scene, he refers to his men as "good Nazis" or some-such phrase. In truth, Admiral Lutjens wasn't a Nazi at all, he was a military man who protected Jews under his command and whose family held anti-Nazi feelings. Secondly, very few soldiers were Nazis. When the British soldiers are told their dangerous orders, the camera gives us close-ups of some of their faces - young men, facing death; we aren't shown anything like this on the Bismarck.

This sounds like negative criticism; it really isn't. This is the way war films were presented, and I don't expect a war-torn country to have sympathy for the Germans; it's just that today there is a different sensibility, not about the Nazis and officers, certainly, but about the normal German people.

This is a very exciting film with some wonderful acting, particularly by Kenneth More, an officer who tries to stay detached from his emotions and demands formality and discipline from his staff. In truth, he is very different from the image he projects. More shows us a fully fleshed-out character. Lovely Dana Wynter plays his efficient WREN assistant. Her working relationship with More grows throughout the film very convincingly. Stepanek is excellent as Admiral Lutjens, who believes in the complete superiority of his ship. The More character correctly uses the man's pride against him.

The effects are incredible, and there looks to be some newsreel footage - grainy footage, anyway - interspersed. Edward R. Murrow broadcasts are included to give the film an air of authenticity. I probably would have preferred the Germans to speak German with subtitles for more reality; a congratulatory note from Hitler written in English is kind of ridiculous.

Despite this, "Sink the Bismarck" is well worth seeing, as is just about anything with the marvelous Kenneth More. It's a very stirring movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Perhaps too cerebral for some, this is an excellent war film
planktonrules31 January 2015
The style of "Sink the Bismarck!" is a bit unusual for a war film. Much of it is not set on the frontlines on the open sea but within the underground confines of the Cabinet War Rooms--a fortified bunker well below the streets of London. In fact, if you want to visit this site today, you can--and it makes for an interesting couple hours.

Within the underground complex, a Captain (Kenneth More) is in charge of coordinating the British Navy's pursuit of the dreaded Bismarck-- one of two incredibly powerful German battleships which terrified the British because its guns were more powerful and armor plating much thicker than on the British naval counterparts. In addition, you do see some battle scenes and while they were done mostly with models (along with a bit of stock footage), they do look rather realistic.

So is the film worth seeing? Yes, especially if you enjoy seeing war films AND don't mind the rather cerebral behind the scenes style of the film.

By the way, while the acting was very good, I was surprised how bad and unconvincing the voice actor was who pretended to be Churchill. It didn't even sound close. Also, as you see the torpedoes going through the water, look carefully and you can see that in some clips you can see the ropes pulling them through the water!
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
That is if you can find it!
mark.waltz12 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This World War II historical drama is thrilling, well acted by a great ensemble, and convincing in its reenactment of a real life mission by the British Navy. As we learn through a German language introduction (no subtitles necessary to understand what is being said...the intensity of the dialog says exactly what the audience needs to hear, even in another language), the Bismarck is the biggest battle ship ever, and it would be nearly impossible to sink it. But as history has learned, no ship is completely unsinkable, and a determined British navy (lead by the cold Captain Kenneth More) strives to do just that. The issue is that the Bismarck keeps disappearing in the midst of the North Atlantic and an error in judgment nearly destroys a British naval ship.

More is surrounded by such familiar actors as Dana Wynter as the only female officer involved in the mission who manages to help More become more human in his dealings with others involved in the mission, especially when news arrives about More's son. As he tells Wynter early in the film, there is no time for emotion in wartime even though Wynter has confided the disappearance of her fiancee a year before at Dunkirk. The film also shows what's going on inside the Bismarck, mainly between German officers Carl Mohner and Karl Stepanek, both determined to honor the Third Reich with success for varying reasons. The film is well photographed and aided with quick pacing, leading to a thrilling and intense conclusion.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Ignorant British Navy
Roman-Nies12 August 2007
The meanwhile approved theory that the Bismarck sank because the Germans did the sinking themselves would only be one more mosaic piece to the phenomenon that the Germans astonishingly knew how to build war-ships. But the British? Apparently not sufficiently. I say astonishingly because the Germans did not start with it long before WW I, having no experience like the other sea nations. The British Navy had a long tradition of being the supreme Sea-Power for more than 3 centuries. This made them perhaps believe that there was no real threat from the "hun" land-rats. But the British ignorance is too apparently the reason for the sinking of the Hood. The Hood was a WWI built ship. If the British would have learned their lesson in the Battle of Jutland and other naval battles of WW 1 with the German "Hochseeflotte" they would have never send the Hood and the not so much stronger Prince of Wales against the two brand new German ships. Naval experts and all who study the matter know well why British warships had extreme difficulties to stand against comparable German warships. I mention here only two facts: 1. the German ships were better armoured, this meant constructed to give a most perfect protection (the British ships being build lighter for more speed could be the winner for the battle with the big Spanish armada, but that was some hundred years ago). I quote a British Admiral at the Battle of Jutland, after two or three of their battleships exploded in a similar way the Hood did: "Something must be wrong today with our ships!" How right he was. The mistake in construction of the British ships were apparent, but no decisions were made. The Hood got a better armour after WW 1, but the Germans got a better artillery and munition as well! 2. the German had the superior artillery. They were able to hit the target in short time of execution. The German artillery was already superior in WW 1. This was a question of development. The German war industry in the first half of the 20. century took advantage of the highly developed German capabilities of engineering.

Luckily the Germans laid more stress on their land armies, otherwise they could have build more of those dreadful ships. One commenter put it right: it would have made more sense to build on the Submarines. But the Germans of those times were not blessed with intelligent leaders, but cursed with very doubtful minded ones. Maybe the British pride could not confess that in their domain - the Navy - they had rivals who were even more capable in certain fields. But it is a fact that wrong decisions, even underestimation of the enemies capabilities cost many lives in WW 1 and WW2 - on both sides. We do not have to speak about the Nazis. They were silly criminals that had to be opposed by all means. I regret that such films do not conclude that Germans were also the victims of the Nazis in the sense that they were misused. The sailors of the Bismarck became victims of being ordered from a criminal regime to serve on the ship. What would You have expected? That they desert? The ordinairy people had not the same informations we have today. There was propaganda. Ironically Germany seems to be today the country with least propaganda, whereas in the USA and Britain it is getting difficult to filter the propaganda and "writing history" in the sense of "we are always the good boys" even from movies made in older days. In the historical Sinking of the Bismarck there is no heroism at all. It is tragedy and waste of lives. But that is always the case in wars. Germany was the oppressor and had to be defeated. But the fate of the single people was everywhere the same. This is what should be shown on films like this to develop a sense for mutual understanding and respect and rejection for any aggression and propaganda.
9 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed