87 out of 106 people found the following comment useful :- Not the '60's & '70's cheesy film you may fear!, 1 enero 1999
Author:
Pates de Boise, Idaho
No one I know under 40 had seen this film, though we all joked about it as
being a stereotypical "bad" film based on rumors. the title, and clips seen
here and there. Finally one weekend when I was working until 2:00 a.m. I
went home and there was a sequel on late night TV, during the 30 year Planet
of the Apes marathon. It made me curious about the original and I tracked
it down. I have to say it blew me away!
The film is philosophical, creative, absorbing and scary. Excellent
commentary on religion and just about everything else. I strongly recommend
to anyone who has not seen it. So far I haven't even been able to convince
my friends to see it because there seems to be such a strong prejudice
against it and some sort of entrenched belief it must be bad; in fact it is
one of the finest films I've seen and I can see why it is a
classic.
If you enjoy films that make you think you simply can't dislike Planet of
the Apes.
70 out of 74 people found the following comment useful :- A Landmark SF film, 31 octubre 2002
Author:
haristas de USA
1968s PLANET OF THE APES has been my favorite film since I first saw it
in
April of that year when I was eight years old. The movie had a huge
impact
back then and I cannot emphasize more the power to grip the imagination
it
had -- and has -- and the shock the final image of the movie was back
then.
I literally left the theatre stunned and speechless. No other movie of
my
youth had such impact, or created such suspension of disbelief. Over the
past thirty-four years PLANET OF THE APES has attained classic status and
it's a tribute to the film's excellence that there are so many comments
left
here on the Internet Movie Database that this film is better than the
viewer
thought it would be, or that it wasn't campy or cheesy as they'd always
thought, or that it was more intelligent and thought-provoking than most
films they've ever seen, and that despite the studio stupidly putting the
final shot -- one of the most famous last shots in the history of
American
cinema -- on the cover of the video, they were still stunned and haunted
by
it.
PLANET OF THE APES is based on a 1963 French novel, "La planete des
singes,"
by Pierre Boulle, most famous as the author of "La pont de la riviere
Kwai"
(1952), which became the 1957 film THE BRIDGE ON THE RIVER KWAI. The
story
tells of a French journalist, Ulysse Merou, who, in the year 2500 travels
with two companions in a near-light speed spacecraft to the red-giant
star
Betelgeuse in the constellation of Orion. There they find a sister
planet
to earth, Soror, and after landing on a remote plateau discover a race of
human beings that are no more than animals, naked and unable to speak.
The
three earthmen are stripped of there clothes by the humans, who hate
anything that isn't natural. Their spacecraft is destroyed by the savage
people and they are run off into the jungle. The next morning the tribe
of
wild humans are attacked by hunters, who are gorillas dressed like men,
hunting like men, and acting and speaking like men. One of the earthmen
is
killed, another disappears, and Merou is captured, taken to a research
lab,
and subjected to scientific experiments.
A sympathetic female animal psychologist, Dr. Zira, a chimpanzee, is
intrigued by Merou keenness and soon learns that this man is highly
intelligent and able to learn speech. With her help Merou learns all
about
the simian civilization on Soror, in which the apes live in modern
cities,
drive cars, fly planes, and watch TV, and where conservative orangutans,
especially one named Zaius, so fear this intelligent human being that
they
seek to have him destroyed. With the help of Zira's fiance, an
archeologist named Cornelius, Merou unwittingly discovers a secret about
the
origins of intelligent life on Soror that's so dangerous he's forced to
flee
the planet of the apes and return to earth.
Boulle's novel is a satire in the tradition of Voltaire that mocks
humankind's anthropocentric theory of the universe from which human
beings
derive their sense of importance, and is laced with the kind of harrowing
ironies that Boulle was famous for.
The movie based on this book is an 'Americanized' adaptation of it. Rod
Serling did the first drafts of the screenplay, simplifying the plot by
fitting it into the mold of his "Twilight Zone" TV series and introducing
an
anti-nuclear war theme not present in the Boulle novel. Because of
budget
constraints the modern ape civilization had to be reduced to a less
technological one, something more reminiscent of ancient Greece. In
fact,
after Michael Wilson, who had also adapted Boulle's "Bridge Over the
River
Kwai" to the screen, was brought in to do the final script drafts what
emerged was a political allegory more akin to an Aesop fable than a
Voltairian satire.
An improvement on the book was to turn the Merou character, now named
Taylor, into a misanthrope and to reduce the scope of the story into a
kind
of 'misanthrope's comeuppance.' Charlton Heston was a perfect choice to
play the unlikable American astronaut, having essayed such similar
'bastard'
roles in 1954s THE NAKED JUNGLE, 1963s DIAMOND HEAD and 1963s 55 DAYS AT
PEKING, and the movie would be a lot less funny and pointed without
him.
Roddy McDowall and Kim Hunter, as Cornelius and Zira, and Maurice Evans,
as
Dr. Zaius, enjoy some of the best performances on the screen, bringing
the
then-innovative makeup design of John Chambers to life under the
intelligent
and stylish direction of Franklin J. Schaffner. Also excellent in this
Arthur P. Jacobs production for 20th Century-Fox is the veteran
cinematographer Leon Shamroy's Panavision lensing, which makes great use
of
remote areas of southern Utah around Lake Powell to suggest an alien
world,
and Jerry Goldsmith's avant-garde musical score, which has become a
landmark, cannot be emphasized more for contributing to the weird
atmosphere
and eerie mood of the movie. Rarely has a movie score so fit like
hand-in-glove than this one.
PLANET OF THE APES was a box office smash in 1968, but if ever there was
a
movie that was more a victim of its own success it's this one. Four
sequels, two TV series, numerous novelizations and comic book adventures,
and a lamentable remake in 2001 have been spawned by its popularity, most
of
which has been so inferior in quality to have tarnished the reputation of
this classy and intelligent SF film landmark. Luckily the qualities of
the
film remind viewers again and again of what noted New Yorker movie critic
Pauline Kael titled her review of this movie, "Apes must be remembered,
Charlie!"
52 out of 64 people found the following comment useful :- Only one word can describe this movie, "WOW", 20 enero 2004
Author:
Greg de New Jersey
Absolutely incredible. Easily in my top 10 all time, and that's saying
something. This movie kept me captivated from the beginning all the way to
the end. It combined a super setting and effects (at least for '68) and the
casting was perfect. This movie included, in my opinion, one of the most
memorable line in film history, "get your damn paws of me, you stinkin'
apes!". Not to ruin it for anyone, the ending is also one of the best in
film history. This easily won my award for most entertaining and original
story ever, because it captivated the imagination, especially considering
the fact that it could actually happen (it's a stretch, but...) This is a
rather short response, but I could just go on and on saying how great it
was, but it would only be redundant. Overall, this movie was absolutely
incredible
9.5\10 stars (I'm a tough reviewer)
41 out of 47 people found the following comment useful :- Much better than the remake, 13 febrero 2004
Author:
rbverhoef (rbverhoef@hotmail.com) de The Hague, Netherlands
The original 'Planet of the Apes' is better than the 2001 remake on almost
every level. May be Tim Burton's version looks better, no wonder with Burton
as the director, but the direction itself, the cinematography, the story and
the performances in Franklin J. Schaffner's original are much better and
more interesting.
Heston is Taylor, who crashes with his spaceship on what seems to be a
deserted planet. He and two other survivors start searching for life. They
run into other human beings, and at that time they are all attacked by apes.
The apes speak English, the human beings are mute. In this society a human
being is what apes are in our society. Animals, nothing more. The humans are
taken for research, Taylor as well, and since he is shot in the neck he is
not able to talk at first. One of his fellow survivors is dead, what
happened to the other is unsure. A female ape who is a scientist discovers
that Taylor understands her, and even thinks he can talk. Of course this is
not what the high people in this society want to hear.
The movie has some very interesting elements. Worlds are upside down, as
Taylor says, and in a way the movie puts a mirror in front of us. The human
beings are humiliated in exactly the way we treat animals. What would we do
if another mammal suddenly knew how to speak our language? We would probably
react the same as the apes do in this movie and therefore it is even more
interesting.
In liked the movie very much, and some very nice moments in particular.
Early in the movie Taylor gets a woman in his cage. He calls her Nova (Linda
Harrison). We know what the apes want, and it is funny because it is exactly
how we do this kind of stuff to our animals. The apes are even surprised
when Taylor wants to keep his woman, and therefore seems
monogamous.
With some nice touches, a great and famous ending, some quotes that will
sound very familiar, Charlton Heston as a pretty good leading man, a score
from Jerry Goldsmith that is perfect for a movie like this, nice direction
and a fine cinematography by Leon Shamroy this movie is a very good
classic.
32 out of 36 people found the following comment useful :- Great Film, 3 enero 2003
Author:
Theo Robertson de Isle Of Bute , Scotland
Unlike the recent Tim Burton remake this can be called a great film .
Franklin J Schaffner does a good job of bringing an otherworldliness ( And
just how ironic is that ?) to the film , and the ending is rightly regarded
as a classic moment of cinema . This is how SF should be made , with little
FX and with much intelligence .
No doubt a reviewer can be critical and point out that a lot of the subtext
of the original novel has been culled and there`s a serious lapse in logic
in that both apes and humans speak the exact same language without either
stopping to point this out , but I like this film and it`s too good to pick
holes at
41 out of 54 people found the following comment useful :- A milestone; one of the best films ever made, 28 julio 2001
Author:
zetes de Saint Paul, MN
When I recently, for fun, ranked my favorite films in a top 100 list,
Planet
of the Apes ended up at 33. It was the second sci-fi on the list, after
2001, which ranked #1. I have always been disappointed and irked at the
ill-will that some people have towards Planet of the Apes. I almost
assaulted someone who described Apes as "one of those so-bad-it's-funny
type
of movies" a few months ago. I take this film very seriously, and I wish
others would do the same.
I think one of the reasons there is so much animosity against this one is
that it is undeniably dated. Not too much, but it would be difficult to sit
a young teenager, raised on 1990s movies, down in front of it and have
him/her enjoy it. Even a young adult, between the ages of 18 and 25, would
find it difficult. Planet of the Apes definitely exists in a specific time,
the late 1960s. This was the best decade for film, churning out tons of
both
American and foreign masterpieces. Times were rough, and the Vietnam War
was
growing in intensity by the time Planet of the Apes was made. Because of
this, we see many references to the current dilemma. The film willy-nilly
debates issues like hunting, violence, animal rights, evolution vs
creationism, class structure, and nuclear war. Taylor tells a young,
rebellious, teenage chimpanzee not to trust anyone over 30 (a common youth
adage in the late 60s). Yes, it has so many topics that it seems to be
about
to burst at times. And, yes, the satire does go overboard once in a while.
Still, it is all argued passionately. You can tell that everyone involved,
even Heston, believes in what they are saying. In its own way, Planet of
the
Apes is as intellectual and philosophical a film as 2001. I know that, when
teens and younger people go see the Tim Burton remake (which is not great,
btw), there are going to be many who overpraise it and say that it is much
better than the original. You would have to be mentally handicapped to
honestly believe so.
33 out of 39 people found the following comment useful :- Going 'Apes' Over Heston's 'Planet', 25 agosto 2001
Author:
moviedemon de USA
This film, directed by Franklin J. Schaffner ("Patton"), is one of the
most
stylized films of the late 1960's. "Planet of the Apes" - which was based
on
the novel by Pierre Boulle - is social commentary at it's best. The film's
post apocalyptic look is breathtaking, and Roddy McDowall (Dr. Cornelius),
Kim Hunter (Dr. Zira) and Maurice Evans (Dr. Zaius) are the standouts in
this finely written tale by Michael Wilson and "Twilight Zone's" Rod
Sterling. The ending - which is still considered one of the best twist
endings of all time - still doesn't disappoint. The film spawned four
sequels, novelizations, cartoons, a TV series, as well as a nicely done
remake by Tim Burton. This is a must see for all film purists.
28 out of 32 people found the following comment useful :- Of Monkeys and Men, 12 noviembre 2005
Author:
sophie_lou21 de U.K, England
In recent years sci-fi have been filled with flashing lights,
high-budget CGI effects and ridiculous stunts like in THE MATRIX and I,
ROBOT. If you don't like one sci-fi film you're unlikely to like any as
they're all the same. However, my dad took down PLANET OF THE APES from
our video shelf. Unlike most sci-fi films it was made in a time that
had to deal without CGI and relied completely on the break through
movie make-up as well as providing what people have voted time and time
again "The Greatest Film Ending". PLANET OF THE APES has a memorable
cast, simple plot and it keeps your attention even as the credits are
rolling at the end. Based on Pierre Boulle's lesser novel (La Planète
des singes AKA Monkey Planet) tells of an astronaut landing on a
distant planet and discovering that man's role as the superior life
form has been reversed with the apes. The film has many needed changes
to it to make it more watch-able and tap into the true fears at the
time the film was made. In 1968, everyone lived in fear of an atomic
bomb attack and PLANET OF THE APES truly taps into that fear, for
reasons I will not reveal but it is understandable why the story was so
popular at the time and why it shocked everyone.
PLANET OF THE APES tells the story of George Taylor (Charlton Heston),
when he and his doomed astronaut friends find themselves stranded on a
distant planet. It seems to be inhospitable with no life. However,
after travelling throughout the place, which is famously referred to as
"The Forbidden Zone", discover plenty of life including ape like humans
and human like apes. Taylor is shot in the neck rendering him unable to
speak. Treated as a wounded animal he is taken to a human-ape study lab
where he meets Zira (Kim Hunter), a sympathetic and friendly
chimpanzee. She almost straight away notices that Taylor's intelligence
goes far beyond that of any other human, and she encourages him to
speak. However, orangutan leader Dr Zaius sneers on Zira's and her
fiancé Cornelius' (Roddy McDowall) belief in any human intelligence,
and won't listen to reason. Despite Cornelius' skeptical feelings
towards Taylor, he agrees to help prove his intelligence which is
proved once he finally says his famous line: "Take your stinking paws
of me you damn dirty ape!"
Heston is anything other then a likable character. Unlike Ulysse Merou
in the novel Taylor is slightly moody, but a likable character who
values his friendship with Zira and Cornelius. He represents what
humans truly are that is self-centered, violent and dangerous. Though
on stage he is reportedly (according to Laurence Olivier) truly a
talented actor, on screen and in PLANET OF THE APES, Heston basically
turned up and played himself. Nonetheless the character of Taylor works
as you either love him or you hate him. The rebel Taylor is no
different from the other pushy characters Heston has played over the
years. With his tough, physical god-like body you suppose that in a
film where the apes are pushing us humans about because we're basically
behaving like apes he is just what the doctor ordered.
Of course we all know that it's the two lovable chimps Zira and
Cornelius that we remember the most in the PLANET OF THE APES films for
their charm and humor they bring to the story. Hunter's portrayal of
Zira was a masterpiece on its own, giving one of the most powerful
performances. It's fair to say that Zira is the strongest and most
developed character in the film. Indeed she is the only ape that Taylor
actually likes! With her wit and admirable sense of humor it's not
surprising that most people asked who their favorite character is reply
"Zira". Hunter manages to make Zira what she was meant to be, more
human then ape. In fact, she's more human than most of the beautiful
female actresses of the 60's films. Despite the fact she looks as ugly
as hell in her ape make-up the charm still shines through.
Of course, if you don't love the intelligent and cool Zira, you always
have intelligent and nerdy Cornelius. McDowell, next to Heston, is the
most celebrated male actor in the films as he comes over as the nerd of
the rebel gang that you just want to hug. In the film, Taylor seems to
have a love-hate rivalry with Cornelius as they constantly challenge
each other like full-blooded males do no matter how civilized. A good
example of this is when Zira allows Taylor to kiss her on the lips as a
goodbye and Cornelius makes his jealousy clear. However Taylor sticks
up for him against Zaius, which shows not as much friendship as
understanding. McDowell is an irreplaceable member of the cast who is
near impossible to live up to.
PLANET OF THE APES is a mark in cinema history, famous for these
talented artists, gripping story and an amazing ending that shocks you,
scares you, breaks you and brings you to tears with the realization
that you'll never truly experience a film like this again. Anyone who
is anyone owes it to himself or herself to watch this film and
experience the feeling. Even people who dislike sci-fi are likely to
enjoy this. A film that truly did break STAR WARS and challenged it
like no other film ever could. PLANET OF THE APES will live on in all
of us. It will go on forever, find its way to younger audiences and
will win them over just it won over us.
30 out of 37 people found the following comment useful :- A superb exercise in fantasy..., 18 febrero 2001
Author:
ironside (robertfrangie@hotmail.com) de Mexico
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
In a magnificent performance, Heston plays what he considers an
"existential" character... He is a cynic who hates mankind enough to
make him leave the Earth in search of "something better than man."
Heston tries to make sense of this "upside-down" world, and in the
process, Pierre Boulle raises such issues as balance of power, racism,
the role of government, and evolution... The apes are seen with cameras
and guns, but strangely, the sight of a paper airplane shocks them...
Schaffner's ability to focus on the human element in the face of
awesome spectacle is one of his greatest assets... He uses dizzying
camera effects, very enthusiastic zooming and hand-held cameras at
ground level during chases...
"Planet of the Apes" is a magnificent visual experience, from the
emerald lake at the beginning to the threatening sea-shore at the
end... The desolate landscapes of the Utah and Arizona National Parks,
represented into primeval ruins, make an appropriately setting for the
first appearance of the talking apes, rounding up humans like
animals... The apes themselves remain an astonishing achievement of
make-up and performance... John Chambers receives an Academy Award for
his art...
The motion picture features one of Heston's strongest, most emotional
performances... Heston escapes, fights and yells... He is violently
treated, caged, dragged, and hosed with powerful jets of water... He
runs barefoot through hills, mountains, plains and an ape city... He is
raided by gorillas on foot and on horseback, humiliated by thoughtful
chimpanzees and mad ape scientists, pelted by inhabitants of the Planet
of the Apes...
The terrific supporting cast is wholly convincing: Maurice Evans in the
role of Zaius, the scientist who does not want his race to suffer the
fate of the humans; the two friendly chimpanzees named Zira and
Cornelius (Kim Hunter and Roddy McDowall) are superb...
"Planet of the Apes" also gives us something else:
-Heston and his crewmen have landed on an unknown planet... They hear
sounds of galloping horses and guns being fired... But what they see is
incredible... Apes on horseback!
- "Bright Eyes" does surprise the apes who believe humans aren't
capable... With those enraged words ("Take your stinking paws off me,
you damn dirty apes!"), he shakes the entire foundation of ape society
and causes the Semians to retreat in shock...
- The crucial scene where Taylor has been given a hearing: As he tries
to explain to his captors that he's come from another planet in a
spaceship, the scene cuts to the monkey tribunal - sitting in the
classic "hear-no-evil, speak-no-evil, see-no-evil - pose...
- When a shaved Taylor kisses Zira in front of Cornelius who is
suffering without complaining... An indecisive Zira expresses:
"Allright. But you're so damned ugly!"
- The ultimate scene: Having finally escaped from his captors with his
mate Nova (Linda Harrison), Heston rides along the beach on horseback
to the Forbidden Zone, once a paradise... Suddenly he spots something
unusual in the distance... He remembers what Zaius told him, "You may
not like what you find!" What he can see was not a rock but
salt-stained metal... As he draws closer, the camera slowly draws back
and up to reveal what must come as a terrible shock...
Backed by a magnificent and unusual Jerry Goldsmith musical score,
"Planet of the Apes" is a stylish and thoughtful science fiction film,
which starts and finishes splendidly... It is a superb exercise in
fantasy, a fine suspense adventure, an exciting and provocative
entertainment...
28 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :- Apes must be remembered, Charlie!, 31 octubre 2002
Author:
haristas de USA
Here is Pauline Kael's review from the February 17th, 1968 New Yorker:
"Apes Must Be Remembered, Charlie"
"'Planet of the Apes' is a very entertaining movie, and you'd better go see
it quickly, before your friends take the edge off it by telling you all
about it. They will, because it has the ingenious kind of plotting people
love to talk about. If it were a great picture, it wouldn't need this kind
of protection; it's just good enough to be worth the rush.
"Adapted from a novel by Pierre Boulle, 'Planet of the Apes' most closely
resembles George Pal's 1960 version of H.G. Wells' 1895 novel 'The Time
Machine.' It's also a little like 'Forbidden Planet,' the 1956
science-fiction adaptation of 'The Tempest,' though it's perhaps more
cleverly sustained than either of those movies. At times, it has the
primitive force of old 'King Kong.' It isn't a difficult or subtle movie;
you can just sit back and enjoy it. That should place the genre closely
enough, without spoiling the theme or the plot. The writing, by Michael
Wilson and Rod Serling, though occasionally bright, is often fancy-ironic in
the old school of poetic disillusion. Even more often, it is crude. But
the construction is really extraordinary. What seem to be weaknesses or
holes in the idea turn out to be perfectly consistent, and sequences that
work only at a simple level of parody while you're watching them turn out to
be really funny when the total structure is revealed. You're too busy for
much disbelief anyway; the timing of each action or revelation is right on
the button. The audience is rushed along with the hero, who keeps going as
fact as possible to avoid being castrated or lobotomized. The picture is an
enormous, many-layered black joke on the hero and the audience, and part of
the joke is the use of Charlton Heston as the hero. I don't think the movie
could have been so forceful or so funny with anyone else. Physically,
Heston, with his perfect, lean-hipped, powerful body, is a god-like hero;
built for strength, he's an archetype of what makes Americans win. He
doesn't play a nice guy; he's harsh and hostile, self-centered and
hot-tempered. Yet we don't hate him, because he's so magnetically strong;
he represents American power -- the physical attraction and admiration one
feels toward the beauty of strength as well as the moral revulsion one feels
toward the ugliness of violence. And he has the profile of an eagle.
Franklin J. Schaffner, who directed 'Planet of the Apes,' uses the Heston of
the preposterous but enjoyable 'The Naked Jungle' -- the man who is so
absurdly a movie-star myth. He is the perfect American Adam to work off
some American guilt feelings or self-hatred on, and this is part of what
makes this new violent fantasy so successful as comedy.
"'Planet of the Apes' is one of the best science-fiction fantasies ever to
come out of Hollywood. That doesn't mean it's art. It is not conceived in
terms of vision or mystery or beauty. Science-fiction fantasy is a peculiar
genre; it doesn't seem to result in much literary art, either. This movie
is efficient and craftsmanlike; it's conceived and carried out for maximum
popular appeal, though with a cautionary message, and with some attempts to
score little points against various forms of establishment thinking. These
swifties are not Swift, and the movie's posture of superiority is somewhat
embarrassing. Brechtian pedagogy doesn't work in Brecht, and it doesn't
work here, either. At best, this is a slick commercial picture, with it's
elements carefully engineered -- pretty girl (who unfortunately doesn't seem
to have had acting training), comic reliefs, thrills, chases -- but when
expensive Hollywood engineering works, as it rarely does anymore, the
results can be impressive. Schaffner has thought out the action in terms of
the wide screen, and he uses space and distance dramatically. Leon
Shamroy's excellent color photography helps to make the vast exteriors (shot
in Utah and Arizona) an integral part of the meaning. The editing, though,
is somewhat distracting; several times there is a cut and then a view of
what we have already seen from a different angle or from much higher up.
The effect is both static (we don't seem to be getting anywhere) and
overemphatic (we are conscious of being told to look at the same thing
another way).
"The makeup (there is said to be a million dollars' worth) and the costuming
of the actors playing the apes are rather witty, and the apes have a
wonderful nervous, hoping walk. The best little hopper is Kim Hunter, as an
ape lady doctor; she somehow manages to give a better performance in this
makeup than she has ever given on the screen before."
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosreparto y equipo completostrivialidadesofficial sitesfrases célebresOverview
información principalinformación combinadareparto y equipo completoscréditos de compañíastv schedulePremios y críticas
comentarios de los usuarioscríticas externascríticas de grupos de usuariosawardsCalificacionesparents guiderecomendacionesmessage boardArgumento y citas
argumentoplot synopsispalabras clave del argumentosinopsis Amazon.comfrases célebresCosas divertidas
trivialidadespifiastemas musicalescréditos extravagantesotras versionesenlaces entre películaspreguntas frecuentesOtro tipo de información
enlaces a productosbox office/businessfechas de estrenolugares de rodajeespecificaciones técnicasLaserdiscDVDlecturas relacionadasNewsDeskMaterial promocional
frases comerciales trailers and videos carteles y enlaces photo galleryEnlaces externos
enlaces a cinesofficial sitesmisceláneosfotografíassound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Planet of the Apes (1968)
87 out of 106 people found the following comment useful :-

Not the '60's & '70's cheesy film you may fear!, 1 enero 1999
Author: Pates de Boise, Idaho
No one I know under 40 had seen this film, though we all joked about it as being a stereotypical "bad" film based on rumors. the title, and clips seen here and there. Finally one weekend when I was working until 2:00 a.m. I went home and there was a sequel on late night TV, during the 30 year Planet of the Apes marathon. It made me curious about the original and I tracked it down. I have to say it blew me away!
The film is philosophical, creative, absorbing and scary. Excellent commentary on religion and just about everything else. I strongly recommend to anyone who has not seen it. So far I haven't even been able to convince my friends to see it because there seems to be such a strong prejudice against it and some sort of entrenched belief it must be bad; in fact it is one of the finest films I've seen and I can see why it is a classic.
If you enjoy films that make you think you simply can't dislike Planet of the Apes.
70 out of 74 people found the following comment useful :-

A Landmark SF film, 31 octubre 2002
Author: haristas de USA
1968s PLANET OF THE APES has been my favorite film since I first saw it in April of that year when I was eight years old. The movie had a huge impact back then and I cannot emphasize more the power to grip the imagination it had -- and has -- and the shock the final image of the movie was back then. I literally left the theatre stunned and speechless. No other movie of my youth had such impact, or created such suspension of disbelief. Over the past thirty-four years PLANET OF THE APES has attained classic status and it's a tribute to the film's excellence that there are so many comments left here on the Internet Movie Database that this film is better than the viewer thought it would be, or that it wasn't campy or cheesy as they'd always thought, or that it was more intelligent and thought-provoking than most films they've ever seen, and that despite the studio stupidly putting the final shot -- one of the most famous last shots in the history of American cinema -- on the cover of the video, they were still stunned and haunted by it.
PLANET OF THE APES is based on a 1963 French novel, "La planete des singes," by Pierre Boulle, most famous as the author of "La pont de la riviere Kwai" (1952), which became the 1957 film THE BRIDGE ON THE RIVER KWAI. The story tells of a French journalist, Ulysse Merou, who, in the year 2500 travels with two companions in a near-light speed spacecraft to the red-giant star Betelgeuse in the constellation of Orion. There they find a sister planet to earth, Soror, and after landing on a remote plateau discover a race of human beings that are no more than animals, naked and unable to speak. The three earthmen are stripped of there clothes by the humans, who hate anything that isn't natural. Their spacecraft is destroyed by the savage people and they are run off into the jungle. The next morning the tribe of wild humans are attacked by hunters, who are gorillas dressed like men, hunting like men, and acting and speaking like men. One of the earthmen is killed, another disappears, and Merou is captured, taken to a research lab, and subjected to scientific experiments.
A sympathetic female animal psychologist, Dr. Zira, a chimpanzee, is intrigued by Merou keenness and soon learns that this man is highly intelligent and able to learn speech. With her help Merou learns all about the simian civilization on Soror, in which the apes live in modern cities, drive cars, fly planes, and watch TV, and where conservative orangutans, especially one named Zaius, so fear this intelligent human being that they seek to have him destroyed. With the help of Zira's fiance, an archeologist named Cornelius, Merou unwittingly discovers a secret about the origins of intelligent life on Soror that's so dangerous he's forced to flee the planet of the apes and return to earth.
Boulle's novel is a satire in the tradition of Voltaire that mocks humankind's anthropocentric theory of the universe from which human beings derive their sense of importance, and is laced with the kind of harrowing ironies that Boulle was famous for.
The movie based on this book is an 'Americanized' adaptation of it. Rod Serling did the first drafts of the screenplay, simplifying the plot by fitting it into the mold of his "Twilight Zone" TV series and introducing an anti-nuclear war theme not present in the Boulle novel. Because of budget constraints the modern ape civilization had to be reduced to a less technological one, something more reminiscent of ancient Greece. In fact, after Michael Wilson, who had also adapted Boulle's "Bridge Over the River Kwai" to the screen, was brought in to do the final script drafts what emerged was a political allegory more akin to an Aesop fable than a Voltairian satire.
An improvement on the book was to turn the Merou character, now named Taylor, into a misanthrope and to reduce the scope of the story into a kind of 'misanthrope's comeuppance.' Charlton Heston was a perfect choice to play the unlikable American astronaut, having essayed such similar 'bastard' roles in 1954s THE NAKED JUNGLE, 1963s DIAMOND HEAD and 1963s 55 DAYS AT PEKING, and the movie would be a lot less funny and pointed without him.
Roddy McDowall and Kim Hunter, as Cornelius and Zira, and Maurice Evans, as Dr. Zaius, enjoy some of the best performances on the screen, bringing the then-innovative makeup design of John Chambers to life under the intelligent and stylish direction of Franklin J. Schaffner. Also excellent in this Arthur P. Jacobs production for 20th Century-Fox is the veteran cinematographer Leon Shamroy's Panavision lensing, which makes great use of remote areas of southern Utah around Lake Powell to suggest an alien world, and Jerry Goldsmith's avant-garde musical score, which has become a landmark, cannot be emphasized more for contributing to the weird atmosphere and eerie mood of the movie. Rarely has a movie score so fit like hand-in-glove than this one.
PLANET OF THE APES was a box office smash in 1968, but if ever there was a movie that was more a victim of its own success it's this one. Four sequels, two TV series, numerous novelizations and comic book adventures, and a lamentable remake in 2001 have been spawned by its popularity, most of which has been so inferior in quality to have tarnished the reputation of this classy and intelligent SF film landmark. Luckily the qualities of the film remind viewers again and again of what noted New Yorker movie critic Pauline Kael titled her review of this movie, "Apes must be remembered, Charlie!"
52 out of 64 people found the following comment useful :-
Only one word can describe this movie, "WOW", 20 enero 2004
Author: Greg de New Jersey
Absolutely incredible. Easily in my top 10 all time, and that's saying something. This movie kept me captivated from the beginning all the way to the end. It combined a super setting and effects (at least for '68) and the casting was perfect. This movie included, in my opinion, one of the most memorable line in film history, "get your damn paws of me, you stinkin' apes!". Not to ruin it for anyone, the ending is also one of the best in film history. This easily won my award for most entertaining and original story ever, because it captivated the imagination, especially considering the fact that it could actually happen (it's a stretch, but...) This is a rather short response, but I could just go on and on saying how great it was, but it would only be redundant. Overall, this movie was absolutely incredible
9.5\10 stars (I'm a tough reviewer)
41 out of 47 people found the following comment useful :-

Much better than the remake, 13 febrero 2004
Author: rbverhoef (rbverhoef@hotmail.com) de The Hague, Netherlands
The original 'Planet of the Apes' is better than the 2001 remake on almost every level. May be Tim Burton's version looks better, no wonder with Burton as the director, but the direction itself, the cinematography, the story and the performances in Franklin J. Schaffner's original are much better and more interesting.
Heston is Taylor, who crashes with his spaceship on what seems to be a deserted planet. He and two other survivors start searching for life. They run into other human beings, and at that time they are all attacked by apes. The apes speak English, the human beings are mute. In this society a human being is what apes are in our society. Animals, nothing more. The humans are taken for research, Taylor as well, and since he is shot in the neck he is not able to talk at first. One of his fellow survivors is dead, what happened to the other is unsure. A female ape who is a scientist discovers that Taylor understands her, and even thinks he can talk. Of course this is not what the high people in this society want to hear.
The movie has some very interesting elements. Worlds are upside down, as Taylor says, and in a way the movie puts a mirror in front of us. The human beings are humiliated in exactly the way we treat animals. What would we do if another mammal suddenly knew how to speak our language? We would probably react the same as the apes do in this movie and therefore it is even more interesting.
In liked the movie very much, and some very nice moments in particular. Early in the movie Taylor gets a woman in his cage. He calls her Nova (Linda Harrison). We know what the apes want, and it is funny because it is exactly how we do this kind of stuff to our animals. The apes are even surprised when Taylor wants to keep his woman, and therefore seems monogamous.
With some nice touches, a great and famous ending, some quotes that will sound very familiar, Charlton Heston as a pretty good leading man, a score from Jerry Goldsmith that is perfect for a movie like this, nice direction and a fine cinematography by Leon Shamroy this movie is a very good classic.
32 out of 36 people found the following comment useful :-

Great Film, 3 enero 2003
Author: Theo Robertson de Isle Of Bute , Scotland
Unlike the recent Tim Burton remake this can be called a great film . Franklin J Schaffner does a good job of bringing an otherworldliness ( And just how ironic is that ?) to the film , and the ending is rightly regarded as a classic moment of cinema . This is how SF should be made , with little FX and with much intelligence .
No doubt a reviewer can be critical and point out that a lot of the subtext of the original novel has been culled and there`s a serious lapse in logic in that both apes and humans speak the exact same language without either stopping to point this out , but I like this film and it`s too good to pick holes at
41 out of 54 people found the following comment useful :-

A milestone; one of the best films ever made, 28 julio 2001
Author: zetes de Saint Paul, MN
When I recently, for fun, ranked my favorite films in a top 100 list, Planet of the Apes ended up at 33. It was the second sci-fi on the list, after 2001, which ranked #1. I have always been disappointed and irked at the ill-will that some people have towards Planet of the Apes. I almost assaulted someone who described Apes as "one of those so-bad-it's-funny type of movies" a few months ago. I take this film very seriously, and I wish others would do the same.
I think one of the reasons there is so much animosity against this one is that it is undeniably dated. Not too much, but it would be difficult to sit a young teenager, raised on 1990s movies, down in front of it and have him/her enjoy it. Even a young adult, between the ages of 18 and 25, would find it difficult. Planet of the Apes definitely exists in a specific time, the late 1960s. This was the best decade for film, churning out tons of both American and foreign masterpieces. Times were rough, and the Vietnam War was growing in intensity by the time Planet of the Apes was made. Because of this, we see many references to the current dilemma. The film willy-nilly debates issues like hunting, violence, animal rights, evolution vs creationism, class structure, and nuclear war. Taylor tells a young, rebellious, teenage chimpanzee not to trust anyone over 30 (a common youth adage in the late 60s). Yes, it has so many topics that it seems to be about to burst at times. And, yes, the satire does go overboard once in a while. Still, it is all argued passionately. You can tell that everyone involved, even Heston, believes in what they are saying. In its own way, Planet of the Apes is as intellectual and philosophical a film as 2001. I know that, when teens and younger people go see the Tim Burton remake (which is not great, btw), there are going to be many who overpraise it and say that it is much better than the original. You would have to be mentally handicapped to honestly believe so.
33 out of 39 people found the following comment useful :-

Going 'Apes' Over Heston's 'Planet', 25 agosto 2001
Author: moviedemon de USA
This film, directed by Franklin J. Schaffner ("Patton"), is one of the most stylized films of the late 1960's. "Planet of the Apes" - which was based on the novel by Pierre Boulle - is social commentary at it's best. The film's post apocalyptic look is breathtaking, and Roddy McDowall (Dr. Cornelius), Kim Hunter (Dr. Zira) and Maurice Evans (Dr. Zaius) are the standouts in this finely written tale by Michael Wilson and "Twilight Zone's" Rod Sterling. The ending - which is still considered one of the best twist endings of all time - still doesn't disappoint. The film spawned four sequels, novelizations, cartoons, a TV series, as well as a nicely done remake by Tim Burton. This is a must see for all film purists.
28 out of 32 people found the following comment useful :-

Of Monkeys and Men, 12 noviembre 2005
Author: sophie_lou21 de U.K, England
In recent years sci-fi have been filled with flashing lights, high-budget CGI effects and ridiculous stunts like in THE MATRIX and I, ROBOT. If you don't like one sci-fi film you're unlikely to like any as they're all the same. However, my dad took down PLANET OF THE APES from our video shelf. Unlike most sci-fi films it was made in a time that had to deal without CGI and relied completely on the break through movie make-up as well as providing what people have voted time and time again "The Greatest Film Ending". PLANET OF THE APES has a memorable cast, simple plot and it keeps your attention even as the credits are rolling at the end. Based on Pierre Boulle's lesser novel (La Planète des singes AKA Monkey Planet) tells of an astronaut landing on a distant planet and discovering that man's role as the superior life form has been reversed with the apes. The film has many needed changes to it to make it more watch-able and tap into the true fears at the time the film was made. In 1968, everyone lived in fear of an atomic bomb attack and PLANET OF THE APES truly taps into that fear, for reasons I will not reveal but it is understandable why the story was so popular at the time and why it shocked everyone.
PLANET OF THE APES tells the story of George Taylor (Charlton Heston), when he and his doomed astronaut friends find themselves stranded on a distant planet. It seems to be inhospitable with no life. However, after travelling throughout the place, which is famously referred to as "The Forbidden Zone", discover plenty of life including ape like humans and human like apes. Taylor is shot in the neck rendering him unable to speak. Treated as a wounded animal he is taken to a human-ape study lab where he meets Zira (Kim Hunter), a sympathetic and friendly chimpanzee. She almost straight away notices that Taylor's intelligence goes far beyond that of any other human, and she encourages him to speak. However, orangutan leader Dr Zaius sneers on Zira's and her fiancé Cornelius' (Roddy McDowall) belief in any human intelligence, and won't listen to reason. Despite Cornelius' skeptical feelings towards Taylor, he agrees to help prove his intelligence which is proved once he finally says his famous line: "Take your stinking paws of me you damn dirty ape!"
Heston is anything other then a likable character. Unlike Ulysse Merou in the novel Taylor is slightly moody, but a likable character who values his friendship with Zira and Cornelius. He represents what humans truly are that is self-centered, violent and dangerous. Though on stage he is reportedly (according to Laurence Olivier) truly a talented actor, on screen and in PLANET OF THE APES, Heston basically turned up and played himself. Nonetheless the character of Taylor works as you either love him or you hate him. The rebel Taylor is no different from the other pushy characters Heston has played over the years. With his tough, physical god-like body you suppose that in a film where the apes are pushing us humans about because we're basically behaving like apes he is just what the doctor ordered.
Of course we all know that it's the two lovable chimps Zira and Cornelius that we remember the most in the PLANET OF THE APES films for their charm and humor they bring to the story. Hunter's portrayal of Zira was a masterpiece on its own, giving one of the most powerful performances. It's fair to say that Zira is the strongest and most developed character in the film. Indeed she is the only ape that Taylor actually likes! With her wit and admirable sense of humor it's not surprising that most people asked who their favorite character is reply "Zira". Hunter manages to make Zira what she was meant to be, more human then ape. In fact, she's more human than most of the beautiful female actresses of the 60's films. Despite the fact she looks as ugly as hell in her ape make-up the charm still shines through.
Of course, if you don't love the intelligent and cool Zira, you always have intelligent and nerdy Cornelius. McDowell, next to Heston, is the most celebrated male actor in the films as he comes over as the nerd of the rebel gang that you just want to hug. In the film, Taylor seems to have a love-hate rivalry with Cornelius as they constantly challenge each other like full-blooded males do no matter how civilized. A good example of this is when Zira allows Taylor to kiss her on the lips as a goodbye and Cornelius makes his jealousy clear. However Taylor sticks up for him against Zaius, which shows not as much friendship as understanding. McDowell is an irreplaceable member of the cast who is near impossible to live up to.
PLANET OF THE APES is a mark in cinema history, famous for these talented artists, gripping story and an amazing ending that shocks you, scares you, breaks you and brings you to tears with the realization that you'll never truly experience a film like this again. Anyone who is anyone owes it to himself or herself to watch this film and experience the feeling. Even people who dislike sci-fi are likely to enjoy this. A film that truly did break STAR WARS and challenged it like no other film ever could. PLANET OF THE APES will live on in all of us. It will go on forever, find its way to younger audiences and will win them over just it won over us.
30 out of 37 people found the following comment useful :-

A superb exercise in fantasy..., 18 febrero 2001
Author: ironside (robertfrangie@hotmail.com) de Mexico
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
In a magnificent performance, Heston plays what he considers an "existential" character... He is a cynic who hates mankind enough to make him leave the Earth in search of "something better than man."
Heston tries to make sense of this "upside-down" world, and in the process, Pierre Boulle raises such issues as balance of power, racism, the role of government, and evolution... The apes are seen with cameras and guns, but strangely, the sight of a paper airplane shocks them...
Schaffner's ability to focus on the human element in the face of awesome spectacle is one of his greatest assets... He uses dizzying camera effects, very enthusiastic zooming and hand-held cameras at ground level during chases...
"Planet of the Apes" is a magnificent visual experience, from the emerald lake at the beginning to the threatening sea-shore at the end... The desolate landscapes of the Utah and Arizona National Parks, represented into primeval ruins, make an appropriately setting for the first appearance of the talking apes, rounding up humans like animals... The apes themselves remain an astonishing achievement of make-up and performance... John Chambers receives an Academy Award for his art...
The motion picture features one of Heston's strongest, most emotional performances... Heston escapes, fights and yells... He is violently treated, caged, dragged, and hosed with powerful jets of water... He runs barefoot through hills, mountains, plains and an ape city... He is raided by gorillas on foot and on horseback, humiliated by thoughtful chimpanzees and mad ape scientists, pelted by inhabitants of the Planet of the Apes...
The terrific supporting cast is wholly convincing: Maurice Evans in the role of Zaius, the scientist who does not want his race to suffer the fate of the humans; the two friendly chimpanzees named Zira and Cornelius (Kim Hunter and Roddy McDowall) are superb...
"Planet of the Apes" also gives us something else:
-Heston and his crewmen have landed on an unknown planet... They hear sounds of galloping horses and guns being fired... But what they see is incredible... Apes on horseback!
- "Bright Eyes" does surprise the apes who believe humans aren't capable... With those enraged words ("Take your stinking paws off me, you damn dirty apes!"), he shakes the entire foundation of ape society and causes the Semians to retreat in shock...
- The crucial scene where Taylor has been given a hearing: As he tries to explain to his captors that he's come from another planet in a spaceship, the scene cuts to the monkey tribunal - sitting in the classic "hear-no-evil, speak-no-evil, see-no-evil - pose...
- When a shaved Taylor kisses Zira in front of Cornelius who is suffering without complaining... An indecisive Zira expresses: "Allright. But you're so damned ugly!"
- The ultimate scene: Having finally escaped from his captors with his mate Nova (Linda Harrison), Heston rides along the beach on horseback to the Forbidden Zone, once a paradise... Suddenly he spots something unusual in the distance... He remembers what Zaius told him, "You may not like what you find!" What he can see was not a rock but salt-stained metal... As he draws closer, the camera slowly draws back and up to reveal what must come as a terrible shock...
Backed by a magnificent and unusual Jerry Goldsmith musical score, "Planet of the Apes" is a stylish and thoughtful science fiction film, which starts and finishes splendidly... It is a superb exercise in fantasy, a fine suspense adventure, an exciting and provocative entertainment...
28 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :-

Apes must be remembered, Charlie!, 31 octubre 2002
Author: haristas de USA
Here is Pauline Kael's review from the February 17th, 1968 New Yorker:
"Apes Must Be Remembered, Charlie"
"'Planet of the Apes' is a very entertaining movie, and you'd better go see it quickly, before your friends take the edge off it by telling you all about it. They will, because it has the ingenious kind of plotting people love to talk about. If it were a great picture, it wouldn't need this kind of protection; it's just good enough to be worth the rush.
"Adapted from a novel by Pierre Boulle, 'Planet of the Apes' most closely resembles George Pal's 1960 version of H.G. Wells' 1895 novel 'The Time Machine.' It's also a little like 'Forbidden Planet,' the 1956 science-fiction adaptation of 'The Tempest,' though it's perhaps more cleverly sustained than either of those movies. At times, it has the primitive force of old 'King Kong.' It isn't a difficult or subtle movie; you can just sit back and enjoy it. That should place the genre closely enough, without spoiling the theme or the plot. The writing, by Michael Wilson and Rod Serling, though occasionally bright, is often fancy-ironic in the old school of poetic disillusion. Even more often, it is crude. But the construction is really extraordinary. What seem to be weaknesses or holes in the idea turn out to be perfectly consistent, and sequences that work only at a simple level of parody while you're watching them turn out to be really funny when the total structure is revealed. You're too busy for much disbelief anyway; the timing of each action or revelation is right on the button. The audience is rushed along with the hero, who keeps going as fact as possible to avoid being castrated or lobotomized. The picture is an enormous, many-layered black joke on the hero and the audience, and part of the joke is the use of Charlton Heston as the hero. I don't think the movie could have been so forceful or so funny with anyone else. Physically, Heston, with his perfect, lean-hipped, powerful body, is a god-like hero; built for strength, he's an archetype of what makes Americans win. He doesn't play a nice guy; he's harsh and hostile, self-centered and hot-tempered. Yet we don't hate him, because he's so magnetically strong; he represents American power -- the physical attraction and admiration one feels toward the beauty of strength as well as the moral revulsion one feels toward the ugliness of violence. And he has the profile of an eagle. Franklin J. Schaffner, who directed 'Planet of the Apes,' uses the Heston of the preposterous but enjoyable 'The Naked Jungle' -- the man who is so absurdly a movie-star myth. He is the perfect American Adam to work off some American guilt feelings or self-hatred on, and this is part of what makes this new violent fantasy so successful as comedy.
"'Planet of the Apes' is one of the best science-fiction fantasies ever to come out of Hollywood. That doesn't mean it's art. It is not conceived in terms of vision or mystery or beauty. Science-fiction fantasy is a peculiar genre; it doesn't seem to result in much literary art, either. This movie is efficient and craftsmanlike; it's conceived and carried out for maximum popular appeal, though with a cautionary message, and with some attempts to score little points against various forms of establishment thinking. These swifties are not Swift, and the movie's posture of superiority is somewhat embarrassing. Brechtian pedagogy doesn't work in Brecht, and it doesn't work here, either. At best, this is a slick commercial picture, with it's elements carefully engineered -- pretty girl (who unfortunately doesn't seem to have had acting training), comic reliefs, thrills, chases -- but when expensive Hollywood engineering works, as it rarely does anymore, the results can be impressive. Schaffner has thought out the action in terms of the wide screen, and he uses space and distance dramatically. Leon Shamroy's excellent color photography helps to make the vast exteriors (shot in Utah and Arizona) an integral part of the meaning. The editing, though, is somewhat distracting; several times there is a cut and then a view of what we have already seen from a different angle or from much higher up. The effect is both static (we don't seem to be getting anywhere) and overemphatic (we are conscious of being told to look at the same thing another way).
"The makeup (there is said to be a million dollars' worth) and the costuming of the actors playing the apes are rather witty, and the apes have a wonderful nervous, hoping walk. The best little hopper is Kim Hunter, as an ape lady doctor; she somehow manages to give a better performance in this makeup than she has ever given on the screen before."
Add another comment
Related Links