User Reviews

Review this title
21 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
I really will watch any Stallone movie
BandSAboutMovies24 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Otherwise known as The Italian Stallion, this movie was a big deal in the mid-1970's, with its urban legend stretching well into the 1980's. Basically, it's a soft core movie with a pre-Rocky Sylvester Stallone in the lead, but there were rumors that it originally had hardcore penetration scenes. That's since been debunked.

Stallone made this film his debut, but did so out of desperation. He'd been homeless for several days and was sleeping in a New York City bus station in the dead of winter. In the September 1978 issue of Playboy, he said "It was either do that movie or rob someone because I was at the end - at the very end - of my rope. Instead of doing something desperate, I worked two days for $200 and got myself out of the bus station."

It was directed by Morton Lewis, who was also behind It's Getting Harder All the Time and the producer of movies I'll soon be searching for, like The Girl From Starship Venus and Secret Rites, which rips the lid off British black magic, complete with a rare on-camera appearance by Alex Sanders.

Stallone got paid $200 and the film, by all accounts, was never shown. Then Rocky happened. Then he was extorted for $100,000 to make the film go away, but he refused to pay. And then our old friends Bryanston Distributing Company got the rights.

I could tell you that this company put out movies like Return of the Dragon, Andy Warhol's Frankenstein, Coonskin, The Devil's Rain! and Dark Star. But what they're really known for is basically stealing The Texas Chainsaw Massacre.

That's because Bryanstone was owned by the Columbo crime family and run by Anthony "Big Tony" Peraino. And they're the ones that made all the money on Deep Throat.

The 1976 release of this film, now called Italian Stallion, starts with a prologue with pornography director Gail Palmer, which further fueled the flames of the adult scenes that were supposedly cut from the film.

What is in the film is pretty boring, unless you've always yearned to see Stallone's yam bag. He plays Stud, who lives with Kitty in New York City. If you didn't guess that from the title...

Stud is pretty much a brutal thug, but he's good in bed and Kitty likes how he whips her with a belt. Later, they have a party and there's a big group scene that ends with Stud taking care of every girl without breaking a sweat. "Yo! I didn't hear no bell," you may say.

An uncredited Janet Bazet also shows upon here and if you've seen enough Michael Findlay and Joe Sarno movies, you'll know who he is. You're also a pervert if you perked up at those two names. It's OK. I understand.

After being released on DVD in the early 2000's, this movie resurfaced in In 2007 when the long-rumored hardcore version showed up. Adult Video News debunked this, however, as what was edited in appeared to be older loops and nothing to do with Stallone.

Bryanston - who resurfaced as a film distribution company - and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer were in negotiations for the rights to this film, but the worldwide rights ended up being sold on eBay in November of 2010 for around $327,000.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Quite a skeleton in Sly's closet
Casey-5215 August 2000
ITALIAN STALLION, the video title, is one of the strangest adult films I've ever seen. I don't know if the version I saw was cut (the box said "Hard R Cable Version"), but overall, pretty unerotic.

Sylvester Stallone (the only real reason why anyone would watch this) turns in a pre-fame role as Stud, an Italian muscleman who has sex with his girlfriend Kitty and has a party at his house where lesbianism, anal sex, and orgies abound. Sly is looking pretty good here, better than he would in later years, and anyone looking for him in full nudity should be pleased here. Otherwise, there isn't much else to recommend. The only other male cast member is an unattractive no-name and none of the women are particularly memorable. There's a black stripper, a lesbian scene (overlong and boring), the 2nd man and his girlfriend have anal sex, and finally, the orgy that lasts FOREVER! This orgy scene only picks up when the camera is on Sly; otherwise, is not very erotic. Other unbelievable scenes: Sly flexes his muscles in a mirror while watching a lesbian scene, a woman flashes Sly in the park, Sly rapes Kitty after she slaps him, and the film ends with Sly slapping Kitty.

Under 60 minutes long, very cheaply done, and not very stimulating outside of Sly's scenes, ITALIAN STALLION is only recommended for those seeking out celebrity porn and no one else.
54 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible!
songofkalima21 May 2013
I heard this was a 'porn' starring Sly Stallone. This stuff is certainly not X-rated, it could probably pass with an R today. No real plot, lots of nudity, but this definitely isn't porn. It's just a bunch of naked bodies rolling around in bed, on the floor, getting high, some spanking, some dancing, all set to a very cheezy disco soundtrack. I cannot even believe how awfully terrible, ridiculous and cheap this movie is. No reason to watch it, unless you just want to see Sly nude and limp. Reportedly, the director tried to blackmail Stallone with this movie for $100,000, and Sly said he wouldn't give them $2. He was right, because it would have been so not worth it, as this film is one of the most uninteresting films ever made.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Burn the negative!!!
MST3Kfan196629 May 2002
All right, this is an historical curiosity because it's Sylvester Stallone's first film. Aside from that, it's a Z-grade porn film celebrating misogyny, drug abuse and, of course, promiscuity. If one had to categorize the "plot", it's a character study of Kitty and Stud's relationship to each other. The director tries to elevate the film to art-house level by inserting overlong montages of Stallone's treks through Manhattan and flashes of a very warm-blooded woman wearing boots, a fur coat and a smile in a snow-covered city park. We watched most of the film on scan...and yes, there are multiple shots of Stallone's genitalia, which have proven to be the only lasting allure this film can boast.
37 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
"Soon... everyone will know who you are."
The_Movie_Cat7 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
It's odd that any overview of Stallone's questionable movie career must always start with this, an insufferably tedious soft porn movie made when he was broke. Homeless and working for $200, the rights to this one were last seen on Ebay in November 2010, where it was sold for £270,000.

The links to Rocky are quite astonishing, not least that it was retitled "The Italian Stallion" to cash in on that film's success. But there's even a bit where Stallone does a run up and arms stretched moment, not to mention an instrumental track around 11m in that alludes so strongly to the Rocky theme I feel certain it must have been added in post- production some years later. Certainly Kitty's voice, which appears (badly) dubbed, does appear to have been recorded at least six years after the film was originally made, with lines like the title quote and the follow up thought "some day he'll be known as the Italian Stallion."

Just about to enter his mid-twenties when this was shot, Stallone isn't as stacked as he would later become, looking like a normal guy who lifts a few weights rather than the "coffee table" that Ruby Wax once described him as. The pacing is almost impossibly slow... nearly seven minutes can go by as "Kitty" gets everything ready for Stud to come home.

Rumours abound that this was a hard core film with the offending bits edited out, but this would seem to defy logic. Not only would removing such elements defy the film's release as an attempted financial concern, but the film clearly isn't that kind of movie. Okay, I could be wrong, but the facile depictions of love making and the half-hearted attempts at being an art movie would seem to bely the idea that shots of penetration were once in this film. It's an utterly sexless sex film, where the flaccid members of the male cast and heavily simulated bouts of love making would in no way indicate there was a darker underside. I've seen some of the alleged clips, and am not convinced that Stallone disinterestedly pretending to be making love without physical contact could suddenly transform into ejaculation shots where his face isn't on camera.

The most controversial element that IS in the film is a scene where Stallone hits Kitty around the head and beats her with a belt, something which turns Kitty on. This raises complex questions about misogyny and violence against women, though also raises the point that there ARE some mixed up women in the world like this, sadly, and also the honest truth that the scenes are amusing in how fake and badly orchestrated they are, no matter what the proposed content. I've seen some comments that suggest that he rapes Kitty here, but it's clear that it's a twisted S & M game that she's a willing part of.

The narration throughout is irritating and a distraction, the music laughably dated, but fun because of it. A group orgy ensues, which may or may not be all in "Stud's" mind. Fans of 60s TV cult "The Prisoner" may get off on seeing a naked ring-a-roses dance, which concludes with the instrumental track used in the final episode, known as "September Ballad".

Ultimately if you're watching this as a Stallone fan, wondering why his face went from gaunt in 1970 to looking like it was about to give birth in laughable dumbfest The Expendables (5/10), then it's worth a view. But unless you're such a Stallone completist, give it a miss.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Had potential
katymattiealfy14 November 2017
Kitty and Stud's would be at least bearable if it was not so sloppily produced. You can pinpoint the exact moment where it all starts to crumble (when KItty seductively licks the blood of from Stud's hand)...The choppy, dubbed dialogue, and it's lack of solid plot (even for a porno!) kind of ruin it..The soundtrack is stellar though! The fact that Sylvester Stallone stars is literally the only reason this movie would even touch eyes beyond the editing room.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
it would be unendurable, even as a porno, if not for the big laughs to be had
Quinoa19841 July 2009
Definition of a Z-grade porno in America; if Porno Holocaust didn't do it for you, then neither will this. Yes, Sylvester Stallone is in it, that's really the only reason any of us have seen it save for the few true-blue perverts who just snuck in the theater in the raincoats and fake glasses and noses. It even got retitled to capitalize on Stallone's fame in the late 70s, ironic since they had to cut out a lot of the "graphic sex". Even more pointless when seeing the film unedited - there is a lot of nudity and "fake" sex. And it is so fake, good un-Godly almighty, that it makes late night Cinemax like Hotel Erotica look like the damn Bard! Wow is this some bad sex on film - one can tell the director just said "alright then, just uh, roll around, smoke some weed, camera will roll, I got to go do number two in the bathroom, it'll be a while."

And, sure, there are some moments of hilarity, and not always just because of Stallone's non-half-assed acting... such as at different times his "method" includes a training montage at the kid's playground, getting into a sexual frenzy after his girlfriend Kitty bites his you-know-what and, yes, she gets aroused by him *whipping her with a belt, or Stud's random moments of pre-Rambo "AAH!" anger that at one point gives him a bloody hand which Kitty licks of greedily like a vampire with down syndrome (note, this is not offense to down syndrome sufferers, only vampires). No, what makes Italian Stallion such an ultimate waste of time is that for all of its glorious pockets of celluloid that provide for the right and drunken viewer-ship some of the most potent MST3K possibilities around, there's so much tedium of relentless writhing around naked and dancing for FIVE MINUTES STRAIGHT to super-bad 70s music.

It gets by as a horrendous guilty pleasure for about 60% of the time. The rest of it is so bad a porno that it may be justified that it's been off the market until recently. No matter what the temptation out of curiosity, or the minuscule rewards, some shards from the time capsule of a career like Stallone's should stay put in its (however shallow) grave; in extremely small doses its some fun, and all at one it's like getting the brown acid at Woodstock.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Soft core. Nothing Hard Here lol
DuskShadow21 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Well what can we say about Sly's first "official" role? It was certainly full of role play, but as for positions? It was all too choreographed to be real. Though it was "pornographic" , especially for the simpler, tightly wound times of the 1970s, this was certainly not actual porn. Plenty of bush from the ladies, which is why I can almost see how the jungles of Nam would be more preferable and less dense. But even this was not that bad. Quite refreshing actually, and not the worst I have seen on a lady. I saw no actual fellatio, no penetration, which was further proved by the terrible excuse for thrusting by the actors that were in positions that would not have allowed it, including one scene where a fellow was bumping his hips into the buttocks of a lady, but nothing was going on lol. HILARIOUS! Eventually there would be a tad of male extremities, but nothing much. And no money shots. Good for Sly too, because it seems he narrowly dodge getting into literal porn, which truly began with a handful of years as we know it, and the guy went on to become one of the biggest hollywood stars of all time. Some people got slapped, but in the most obviously fake fashion more often than not, which I started to chuckle at. Full of a few laughs, some stereotypical scenes of hippy and dippy nonsense, this is just a piece of historic film to be seen, and then hopefully never seen again. BRAVO SLY! Ya dodged the bullet...as did the ladies in this flick :P THE. END. And the FRONT. You'll see what I mean 4/10 History twas made!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Is that Sylvester really naked?
spfi21 December 2001
Ok. Curiosity prevailed and I rented this "X" rated movie (which would probably get an NC-17 in this day and age) and couldn't believe how bad it was. Ok, we all have to start somewhere, but Stallone come on. The makers of this movie should have waited for 'Deep Throat' to see how a real adult film is made.
9 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Bi-Gone Era
accattone7415 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Why should you see a twenty-four year-old Sylvester Stallone in an X-rated film? Geesh…talk about a self-defeating question. Of all the famous instances of Hollywood superstars and icons probing into the underbelly of blue-movie making, none are as actual as Stallone's 1970 foray into porn – The Party at Kitty and Stud's. I'm sorry, but the stills I've seen of Joan Crawford's, Sophia Loren's, Marilyn Monroe's and Marlon Brando's supposed ventures into the XXX are not convincing; OK, maybe Monroe's really does look like her, but the big black 'member' in her mouth looks nothing like Arthur Miller's. And as for Streisand's, don't make me laugh – the goy in that blurry footage looks nothing like my Babs.

Shelved after filming was completed, The Party at Kitty and Stud's was edited and released in 1976 as The Italian Stallion, so as to cash in on Sylvester Stallone's recent catapulting into the upper-strata of stardom. The version that will be shown this night is in fact this very 1976 cut, as edited and presented by Gail Palmer, legendary porn star and filmmaker in her own right (see The Erotic Adventures of Candy and Nazi Love Island). The new title was seen as a marketing ploy on the part of Palmer to cash in on Stallone's new moniker at the time, but if you pay attention closely to the striking Henrietta Holm, who portrays Kitty in the film, at one point she tells Sly, "Someday you'll be known as the Italian Stallion." Apparently Miss Holm missed her true calling as a psychic.

Any attempts on my part to offer a "synopsis" of The Italian Stallion would likely end in dry disaster. Except for a winter wonderland-ish park scene in the beginning where Sly gets flashed by a wild-eyed chick, the majority of the movie transpires in a single, though at times crowded apartment. And the dialogue is dense with drug-riddled diatribes, although they are most often highly amusing. Nevertheless, if you're a fan of the Dallesandro-era films of Paul Morrissey, then The Italian Stallion is the movie for you. The dialogue is, as I noted, quite riotous – "Be careful, you bit me last time…" / "I'll be velvet-mouthed on your shank of love." The acting isn't half-bad, considering the kind of crap Stallone ended up making after this, and Henrietta Holm is at least charismatic (think of a cross between Holly Woodlawn and Cat Power). You get to watch Stallone ogling his hot not-yet-gross overly-muscled bod in mirrors, flexing, trying to be all Method-esquire, which in itself will keep you chuckling.

This film was made back when porno-making was still done by sleazy people, with sleazy people, and for sleazy people. Long before pornography tried to gain any sort of respectability as an art form – boring – the blue-movies were quite verité, almost slice-of- life if you will. And in 1970 all anyone in New York City was doing was having orgies, getting high, and beating up on his or her junkie-partner, right? I wouldn't go so far as to call The Italian Stallion a documentary, but chances are, between takes and after the three (yes, three) days of filming, the people in front of the camera didn't know the difference. This realization alone makes The Italian Stallion more than a worthwhile experience.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Shameful Attempts to Cash in on Stallone's fame.
wildcard9716 August 2016
There's nothing really to say about this film except for what the makers did to it after Stallone became big with Rocky. Just doing a review on the movie itself, there's nothing. It's a cliché under budget early '70s porn flick that does nothing. However, when this movie was re-released after the premiere of Rocky it was altered to somewhat piggyback off of Rocky. They changed the title to "Italian Stallion" to reference Stallone's nickname in Rocky. They dubbed a line in the movie to make the main girl say "Someday they'll call you the Italion Stallion". Lastly, and note that I don't know if it's true so please don't quote me on this but, the song in the beginning when we first see Stallone sounds like a rip-off of "Gonna Fly Now" from Rocky. I mean seriously!? The makers were so desperate to make a profit off of Stallone's fame years after making this movie that they'll do anything to reference Rocky. I can understand re-releasing it 6 years later because they would've never known Stallone would get a big break. But all they could've done was have a few ads promoting the re-release and have a poster with Stallone's face on it and have it say "Starring Sylvester Stallone" or "Stallone's debut" or something along those lines. But by altering it even slightly to somewhat piggyback is just embarrassing. The only thing to gain from this movie is bragging rights to say to your friends "I saw Sylvester Stallone's dick." or "I saw the "legendary" Stallone porn movie." They even try to justify the changes to say it's a "milder" version. If's there's anything below mild, this movie is way down there. For it being just over an hour long, it really drags on and feels like eternity. If you decide to see it, good luck. Now to use my bragging right in saying "I saw Stallone genitals!" and "I saw Stallone's porn movie!"
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Stallone is hot!
roses8887 April 2005
SPOILERS... A very young Sylvester Stallone is looking really fantastic here. You can really see his charm coming out during this film. His body is in very good shape,not at all "over done" like in his later years. He and the female lead in this film "Kitty" seem to really like each other.I noticed in some of the scenes, you see her catching glimpses of him when she does not think the camera is on her. You will notice they "crack up" by mistake during some of the ridiculous phrases.They seem to have a natural "chemistry".Perhaps they were a real couple at the time? This movie was filmed in the winter with Stallone running & tripping in the snow during the opening scenes, he also does some pre "Rocky" moves on a jungle gym. Some of the dialogue is either cut out or dubbed with other words added. Kitty "thinks out loud" and says some really bad quotes. Most of the scenes are pretty ridiculous: Stallone punches his hand through a window and Kitty licks off the "blood", he beats her with a belt while she moans, all the characters talking in a tiny bathroom,(what is the purpose?),Stallone flexing his muscles in a mirror while the "Rocky Theme" plays in the background,at the end is a hippie orgy party. Dancing around naked to late sixties music is big in this film, along with smoking & getting high. You can tell a lot of the scenes were just cut off. A lot of unnecessary, naked, dancing of the women is thrown in, perhaps to replace all the deleted scenes. There are no real graphic sex scenes, just a whole lot of rolling around, which at times is hard to follow. The editing is horrible in this movie. I would say this film is interesting & entertaining if you like Stallone, and if you want to peak your curiosity.
39 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This is a good movie
PeterRoeder5 November 2009
I think this is a very good movie, but the second DVD in the package did not work which was sort of annoying. It is interesting to see this early Sylvester movie. He is only 23 years at the time. It is interesting to see how people behaved around 1970. I wonder if all parties were like that at the time? Anyway, one of the most funny parts of this movie is that Sylvester does not seemed turned on by the action. There are three naked women in front of him having lesbian sex and he seems bored out of his mind. Moreover, it is interesting that this movie was changed after Rocky, so that it refers to Sylvester's "destiny". This reminds me of the way Bruce Lee movies were altered without Bruce's permission.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A riot!
friedmannc3 May 2020
This film was a riot drawing unintended laughs and smiles right from the start, for a while. The scenes of obvious simulated sex, naked rolling bodies, ridiculous moaning, etc. Then there were the boring parts. Many poorly done scenes could have been overlooked if they were short but when they were extended to four or five minutes, it becomes monotonous. The five minutes to rinse and dry the bloodied hand would be a case in point. Stallone's extended muscle posing, the rolling around naked, the fun house mirror, the phony, fierce beating, the orgy (so erotic that the men never had an erection,) all quickly became boring. Of course, if they had been cut, the film would be less than an hour. Everything from story to photography was subpar or ridiculous. And the pubic hair! Natural is nice but three of the women could have won a prize for the darkest, fullest, most extensive pubic hair. If they shaved, they could sell it as a complete merkin (pubic wig.) The film rates about a 2 but the humor and Sly's presence raise it to a 4.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Mmmmm, interesting.
mcys0908626 December 2002
As a big Stallone fan, I recently bought this movie on video to add to my collection of his movies, and also of course to see what the movie was like - and Sly in the nude. :o) I certainly enjoyed watching Sly get it on, but that is of course because I fancy him. For anybody else or for somebody who doesn't fancy Sly, this movie isn't exactly great. I doubt very much that Sly would star in a porn movie ever again, which is a big shame! :o( If he starred in one nowadays I'm sure it would be 10 times better. If you're new to Stallone and his acting, I recommend Rocky as THE Sly film to watch. If you're just wanting to watch plenty of "decent porn" (as someone who doesn't fancy Sly as I've already mentioned) then do not rent out or buy this! I'm no porn movie expert, I only bought this for reasons explained above, but I'm sure there are plenty of saucier "blueys" out there for you.. Yes, you do get to see ALL of Sly. I just thought I'd mention that. :o) Also, fast forward the annoying girl at the beginning of the movie who rambles on about how this is Sly's first movie and how it may contain explicit scenes bla..bla..bla.. ENJOY! X X X
32 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
At Least Stallone Talks About the Film
Michael_Elliott21 April 2015
The Party at Kitty and Stud's (1970)

* (out of 4)

Kitty (Henrietta Holm) and her lover Stud (Sylvester Stallone) have the greatest sex imaginable even though Stud has a bit of a temper at times. The two of them decide to have some of their friends over for a sex party.

This film would have long been forgotten had it not been for the fact that the producers got lucky and hired someone who six years later would write and star in ROCKY. That's right, this here is the notorious picture that Stallone made for $200 when he was desperate for work, living in the streets and basically just took whatever he could. Over the years the myth surrounding this film has gotten out of control with there being talk of it being a hardcore porn film. Well, that's certainly not the case but you have to give Stallone credit for at least talking about the film since so many actors try and hide things from their past.

This film is out there in a couple different versions including an "alternate" version under the title of Italian STALLION, which was obviously an attempt to cash in on the success of ROCKY and there's even music from that film that has been ripped off and placed here. It's funny to note that there's even a scene early on where Stallone is just running around a park, which, of course, would become a major piece to ROCKY when his character was running around the streets.

So, how is the actual movie? It's quite awful as it appears the director just grabbed a camera and was filming anything they could so that they could get the camera back to the rental place on time. The sex scenes are certainly never erotic and at times you're wondering to yourself what type of dope was being smoked especially during some of the bizarre and hilarious dance sequences. Just check out the circle dance towards the end and you'll see what I mean. The dialogue itself is so incredibly bad that I couldn't help but laugh incredibly hard at times. The awful dialogue pretty much makes the film worth watching.

As far as Stallone goes, well, his performance certainly isn't good but then again it's doubtful he was hired for acting. He basically just rolls around in bed with a few women, dances around naked and flexes in the mirror. Yes, he's got several full frontal nude shots here so I'm sure fans of his will want to see that. What's actually sad is that none of the sex scenes here are as laughable as the one in THE SPECIALIST so perhaps that's why Stallone is willing to freely talk about this thing. Either way, at best, this is just a curio for Stallone fans.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An excellent film, showcasing Stallone's true acting talent.
arvig13 September 2010
I know people might try to debate that the first "Rocky" or perhaps even the first "Rambo/First Blood" film shows off Stallone's acting talents much better then this small independent film made at the start of his career. But for me, this shows off Stallone's true acting talent, true skills. The subtle nuances he gives the character of "Stud" truly make the film come alive. The fact that his first film was a romantic comedy with some slight erotic undertones (although perhaps not as erotic as let's say "Stop, Or My Mom Will Shoot") shows what might have been if Stallone hadn't picked a direction like drama with Rocky, and action films with the Rambo films. Believe me, although I suppose both make good "popcorn" movies, his acting pales in comparison to the work in this film. Rent this, buy this, borrow this, or do whatever else you must do to see this. You'll regret not seeing this film on your deathbed if you don't, it is that good. The only minus? There's some odd sex scenes that seem to have very little to do with the plot or character development, but this was the freewheeling 70's too, and I'm sure they were put in to heighten the erotic aspects of this film. (Again, I find "Stop Or My Mom Will Shoot" a bit more erotic, though).
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Adds to Stallone's legend as a stud
janlea-218 October 2001
This film became a part of his legend once "Rocky" made Stallone famous. It was talked about and became mythical in proportion. It may be low-grade filmmaking, but who cares? The point is that most don't bother to see it, they don't have to. Just knowing it exists gives fans something to chew that fat about and makes him all the more of a classic folklore figure of Americana.
21 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Released Commercially As "The Italian Stallion" In 1978!
GuyRover11 June 2020
The 10 star rating is because of the music, not the film (the music is the star of the film if you ask me, like a feature length R rated music video). But just wanted to make a statement here that many people have been confused about over the years. "The Party At Kitty And Stud's" never actually saw an official release in 1970 outside of an independent showing in NYC. The version that everyone knows and what's always been commercially available is "The Italian Stallion" from 1978. The really great Disco and Jazzy music score by Kay Leodel that's the real star of this film (credited as Leo Del on the film's poster - which was a name variation the composer used on another film) had nothing to do with "The Party At Kitty And Stud's" original 1970 cut from 8 years earlier.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A better comedy than "Stop! Or my mom will shoot!!!"
DJ Inferno23 August 2001
This film was featured in the midnight program of German cable many years ago and all I can remember that every soap advertising is more stimulating than this poor porn flick. "The Party at Kitty and Stud´s" was shot in the 70s and the whole cast looks like a total hippie-crowd! You should only watch this movie if you want to know how long Sly´s dick is or to see him having sex with unattractive women. Otherwise this film is a real rarity today, one of the sins of one´s youth the celebrities are ashamed of today. Really seldom to see, so it´s worth ONE look because of its unconscious humor and the most untypical role Stallone has ever played!!!
19 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This is not much of a X-rated film.
Serpent-55 December 1999
Looking at this film today, it's got lot less stuff in it, compare to any late night cable film. The film (ITALIAN STALLION) version seems to be cut (Playboy channel print ran 3 minutes short also, compare to the video print), as the filmmaker tacks in a ROCKY-like theme throught the film. Stallone plays stud, a guy Kitty loves as they throw a party with a bunch of drugged out losers. One guy (who resembles New York character actor Anthony Holland, could it be him?) gets stoned a says a joke about a horse, but the punchline was cut out for some reason. Stallone keep seeing this chick naked out in the New York park, also doesn't make sense. The ending is confusing as they all dance in circles. Stallone should've paid the producers of this film off to get this terrible film removed. I would like to see the original version of this film, for it would've been more interesting to see what they cut out. Not recommended.
11 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed