Savages (1972) Poster

(1972)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
SAVAGES (James Ivory, 1972) **1/2
Bunuel197630 July 2008
Having read that this unusual James Ivory-Ismail Merchant production was a pseudo-Bunuelian concoction, I thought I’d acquire it for my long-planned Luis Bunuel tribute on the 25th anniversary of his death (which occurred on 29th July 1983). Now that I’ve watched it, apart from the obvious thematic allusions to ROBINSON CRUSOE (1952), I’d say that it’s also a half-baked inversion of THE EXTERMINATING ANGEL (1962) which, apart from the occasional amusing passage, fails to entertain or enlighten the viewer, much less do justice to its intriguing subject matter.

For being such a radical stylistic departure for them (even at that early a stage in their careers) and the film’s own satirical intent, it might not be as surprising to learn that Merchant-Ivory here engaged two young writers from the “National Lampoon” school – George Swift Trow and Michael O’Donoghue (later also of “Saturday Night Live”) – to pen the script, not to mention the title track! The latter plays over an animated dramatis personae which introduces us to an archetypal assortment of upper-class citizens complete with clichéd monikers typical of Silent cinema (a bully, a capitalist, a decadent, the limping man, etc.). After this lengthy prelude, a curiously-drawn intertitle “The Mud People” plunges us in a black-and-white world of a group of scavenging prehistoric people. We follow their rituals for the next ten minutes or so (including the yearly ‘death by stoning’ of their queen’s consort) until a flying croquet ball unaccountably lands in front of them. The repercussions of this mundane event are, for a little time at least, as life-altering as the monolith had been to the apes in Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY (1968) or the Coke bottle would be to Jamies Uys’ African bushmen in THE GODS MUST BE CRAZY (1980)…but again, the end result hardly proves itself as enthralling as the former or as funny as the latter.

Admittedly, the interesting ensemble casting of Susan Blakely, Thayer David, Salome Jens, Martin Kove, Sam Waterston and Kathleen Widdoes does work rather admirably where – as inexplicable as the central conceit of THE EXTERMINATING ANGEL itself – we see these brutes coming upon an abandoned mansion in the woods which they start exploring and, seemingly soon after, change into the socialite-types seen in that prologue with the requisite immaculate English diction! The screen also reverts back to color at this point setting the stage for a long society party segment with its typical show of the malaises of the civilized world in this ‘modern’ age (greed, lust, power, jealousy, etc.). Within the film’s context, I guess, the fact that one (or perhaps two) of the guests seem to be in drag for no good reason can be excused but I have to say I was startled to see included towards the end a steamy lesbian encounter in a car which, unsurprisingly, heralds the start of the savages’ regression to their original uninhibited state.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Stomping on a Spaniel
wes-connors22 September 2011
After a cringing song, we are introduced to "The Mud People" getting high on some foliage. This is our cast of characters, in black-and-white, and more unrecognizable than their names in the opening credits. They wander semi-nude in a collection of mop heads, jock straps, and animal gear. Some wear head masks resembling bags and buckets - the style made famous by "The Unknown Comic". From somewhere (possibly the future), a croquet ball interrupts their rituals. Croquet is the game of polite society, you know. The croquet ball eventually leads the cast to an abandoned mansion, where they assumed the identities of displaced inhabitants gathering for a dinner party. The switch from primitive to civilized brings color and conversation to the tribe...

This is an obvious allegorical story. It would qualify as awful if it weren't so artfully made, overall, by "Merchant Ivory Productions"...

Our charming hostess Anne Francine (as Carlotta) presides over an adept New York stage-dominated cast. These include two from the recently disbanded "Dark Shadows" company, Thayer David is blonde buzzed capitalist "Otto Nurder" while amorous transvestite "Hester" is played by Christopher Pennock; both actors had been in Tarrytown (one of the film's locations) to film "Night of Dark Shadows" (1971). Most familiar in the cast are probably limping man Sam Waterston and model-turning-actress Susan Blakely. Everything can be described in one of the film's title cards: "Tribal elders are often distinguished by pebbles embedded in their teeth although such is not the case here." Quickly as you flee, snatch this pebble from my teeth...

***** Savages (5/8/72) James Ivory ~ Anne Francine, Thayer David, Christopher Pennock, Sam Waterston
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Merchant-Ivory's Best - And Most Atypical?
dwingrove13 October 2004
Was it de Tocqueville who wrote that America passed from barbarism to decadence with no civilization in between? If so, then he (or whoever else) deserves at least partial screen credit for Savages. A bizarre and blackly comic fable, this is Merchant-Ivory's most atypical film. It was also, probably, their biggest flop. Yet fans of the duo will find much recognise and admire. Non-fans may enjoy it even more!

Savages opens in dazzling sepia-toned black-and-white. A tribe of primitive forest-dwellers called the 'Mud People' find a mystical round orb that's fallen from an alien world. (In other words, a croquet ball.) They trace its path to an elegantly dilapidated Colonial-style mansion. As they explore the house, the prehistoric intruders start to play dress-up. Soon enough, the screen shifts into colour. The 'savages' transform into the denizens of a grandly decadent 1920s house party...

Chief among them are a formidable Auntie Mame-style hostess (Anne Francine), a toothy and spirited debutante (Susan Blakely), an elegantly faded 'fallen woman' (Salome Jens) and an exotic, eyelash-fluttering vamp (legendary Andy Warhol icon Ultra Violet). As usual in a Merchant-Ivory film, the women's roles are stronger than the men's. But a young Sam Waterston is on hand, rehearsing his 'detached and disenchanted observer' role for The Great Gatsby.

While that later film is little more than a parade of gorgeous costumes and opulent sets, Savages is considerably more. Ivory's eye for social nuance and period detail is as sharp here as in later masterworks like Quartet, Heat and Dust and A Room with a View. Yes, it may perhaps be possible to dismiss Ivory as a bland director - but only if you dismiss Jean Rhys, E.M. Forster or Henry James as bland authors. Or is it a crime to be a discreet and faithful adaptor of other people's work?

Savages is one of the rare films based on Ivory's own imagination. And what a perverse and mordant imagination it turns out to be! What little 'civilisation' the 'savages' acquire in the guise of Jazz Age socialites is, of course, a flimsy and feeble veneer. We can't be surprised when they revert to full-fledged barbarism. In fact, the honesty of that primal state comes as something of a relief.

Savages is impeccably acted, smoothly directed, wittily written, richly designed - and photographed with jaw-dropping splendor by Walter Lassally! It may be something of an aberration in the Merchant-Ivory canon. It is also, possibly, their best film.
21 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Stupendously atrocious...
moonspinner559 September 2011
Director James Ivory's worst film, an absurd allegory which hopes to juxtapose the different (and yet oh-so-similar) worlds of a primitive culture of half-naked forest savages and a decadent group of sexually-ambiguous high society turnips of the 1920s. The screenplay by George Swift Trow and (of all people) Michael O'Donoghue, from Ivory's story, gives us stock characterizations without any personalities of interest, and the amateurish look of the film--part "Cold Comfort Farm", part D.W. Griffith--is confounding and ridiculous. Social satire needs more than just 'uncommon' common ground, it needs spirit and a dash of wit. Ivory clumps through this menagerie with very little grace or humor, however he is helped by Joe Raposo's (suitably) bizarre music. A curio, nothing more. * from ****
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
No Substance, Lost Potential
lar357926 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Based upon release dates, I was provided with this version as opposed to the 2007 film of the similar name. Keeping an open-mind, I watched patiently.

People will celebrate its oddness of colliding civilizations and languages while also mentioning the threads of overlap in poor behavior in both the 'mudpeople' and the merely dressed better actors - this is not enough to make a good film. To fixate on the eccentricities without considering the cohesive whole does anyone considering spending time with this film a disservice. To start, instead of developing the divide between words and actions, the plot moves forward without leaving the viewer with any motif. Stylistically, not providing moments of quiet with the camera to draw out the characters' inner thoughts makes this picture forgettable. Utterly two-dimensional, I pity Sam Watterson's involvement.

There is humor unintentionally created by death and the indifference by the other characters. Amusement is highlighted at the end. The people's hysterical and manic attraction to merge with the jungle once more is laughable. Who knew croquet was so powerful?
4 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Part Python, part Cold Comfort Farm
mattpotterjourno23 December 2006
Blimey. Well, I saw this years ago, and it's just one of those things that stays with you. Why? Well, here's why: Pythonesque premise meets Merchant-Ivory production values and stylings; weird silent-movie captions; weirdly (and very British) perversity; fresh-as-cress approach and general feeling of a bunch of hugely talented students having a right old lark; mud-caked savages who are, of course, nothing of the sort when you hold them up to typical toff behaviour in civilised society. Like David Lynch's Mulholland Drive, you don't want to be watching this (as I was) when you're at home with 'flu: it does tend to make you think you're iller than you are, and maybe hallucinated something weird happening on TV. Altogether brilliant. A one-off.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Watch it for the savage wit of Michael O'Donoghue
craigjclark15 May 2001
Arguably one of the most bizarre films Merchant-Ivory ever produced, "Savages" is definitely a product of its times (the late '60s/early '70s), yet it still holds certain charms. James Ivory may have come up with the original idea, but it's screenwriters Michael O'Donoghue and George Swift Trow who made the most of the concept, offering up examples of all types of physical and verbal savagery.

The film's a little slow at the start -- after the opening credits it runs like a silent black and white film (with title cards and everything) for some time -- but stick around long enough and it becomes sepia-toned and finally full color as the Mud People take on the outward appearances of high society while still retaining their primitive identities.

Recommended for fans of O'Donoghue's acid wit and anyone who isn't afraid of satire.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
none
bobdobbs88818 May 2012
Warning: Spoilers
So Michael O'Donoghue wound up in this movie...alriiiiiiight!

Known as 'Mister Mike', first head writer, and the guy who essentially established the weird part (aired in last 1/2 hr) of Saturday Night LIve, and also co-founder of Natl Lampoon, among many other achievements.

A good bio, Mr. Mike: The Life and Work of Michael O'Donoghue by Dennis Perrin. Mr Mike was a literary terrorist who had a rare thing, the 'killer instinct'. A lefty, he fought against what he perceived as soft things like New Age, romanticism, and other nicenesses. He was a hip wild man with a brain tumor. An angry man.

While the main idea for "Savages" was Ivory/Merchant and the general layout was probably Trow's the dialogue must have been pure Mr Mike. Not a 'complete' movie, but as a presentation of O'Donoghue it's gold. Because of Merchant/Ivory the production was quite good which makes for a paradox—normal-seeming film, but absolutely far out.

Literary all the way, O'Donoghue deconstructed the deconstruction (throw a part of another decon in there and you have magic (transcendence)—2+, or three-ish, if you will. Three being the first resolution of the first bifurcation—1 manifesting as phenomenology (polar opposites, 2), creating movement between the two, or change (3).

A basic theme in this grand satire of culture/civilization is the domination of masculine over feminine, of ration-only over rational AND irrational together. Of logic-only over logic and illogic together. This is played out masterfully, eg, in the Miramar discussion in the Dinner Party, but runs throughout. Style is used creatively to great effect—style being so misunderstood by almost everyone. Here it is portrayed as a mode or gestalt that holds together long enough to convey a subset of mores, folkways et al. Then it is pitted against another style, all within the scene itself—just like modal jazz. Add to this that the dynamics involved are esoteric and you have the main reason this film is not well understood or appreciated—it would just look like weirdness, however amusing. In fact, most creativity IS modal, which is basic flexibility, freedom of expression. Staying in musical 'keys' is essentially rigidity, like the Well Tempered Clavier of the rigid masculine-dominating West. Move like a Queen in Chess, in any direction—the killer instinct to be sure!

All components of literary convention are in play here, even surrealism, which completes the self-referring second deconstruction. It's like 'anti-magic'; everything disappears.....of course, Mike was an angry man.

Another very interesting thing is Mike's satiric usage itself—by showing 'Bletology' as 'itself' and thus hogwash, Bletology (occult system of elements as integrated through all of Life, eg, "9 Star Ki" from Japan) is presented in all earnestness to great effect, as though it is real. It is carried obviously too far, but the hogwash effect gets lost in the style experiments going on all over—'it's real'. Like other scenes 'making fun' of these hidden intelligences of Life, such as the damage modern buildings can have magnetically, the effect comes out 'sideways', like the whole sensibility of the film—perhaps normal. Hmmmm...

In "The Masks are Off" pool scene exhibiting the 'wearing off' of cultural personas gets really far out, even for this film. Brief aspects of "Vanilla Sky", metaphysically; "The Shining" nr the end where the veil lessens and ALL the ghosts appear—chaos rampant, even bits we're not to understand.

You get a Mr Mike 'sampler'; it's a lesson in how to appreciate what would otherwise be discounted as 'weirdness'. Remember, "all the things are like the real things, only here they're very small".

Michael O'Donoghue was an angry killer and a creative genius who made beauty. There are (begrudged?) moments here that are all the more so for the immensity of scale, the 'whole world' they take things to task in. Those enemies of, besmirchers of, the precious. They are felled and done away with; not in our life any more. Any who put themselves vulnerable for art are protected, they can count on it even if it doesn't look like it. Thanks, Mike.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Awesomely good absurreal head-spinner.
EyeAskance20 March 2004
The primitive tribal mud people are startled by a croquet ball that emerges from an unexplored region of their forest. The set out to find the origin of this alien sphere, and happen upon a lavish(and abandoned)estate. Bewildered by this strange place and all the things within it, they quickly "evolve", assuming the roles of bourgeois aristocrats. They do, however, retain many of their ritualistic customs and sexual behaviors, and, in one of the film's more inclement moments, respond to death with a discomposed, uneasy silence. These scenes might lead the viewer to query just how far removed people really are from their autochthon ancestry.

SAVAGES is about as surreal and strange as movies come, but not at all lacking in depth, substance, or humor(chiefly in a subtly saturnine, cynical vein). Certainly not suited to all tastes, but strongly recommended to those with a slant toward wry absurdist cinema.

7.5/10
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bizarre, Bizarre, Bizarre
James-18410 August 1999
The plot summary provided does a good job of describing "Savages," a film I rented at a Kwikshop in the late 1980s. Co-written by Michael O'Donoghue (of early SNL writing fame), this movie ranks near the top of my "Weird Films" list. Explanatory narration was, I believe, in German, which of course limited the effectiveness of the explanations. The decadence of the Long Islanders was truly kinky, and shades of "The Gods Must Be Crazy" are evident in the croquet ball (nee soda bottle).

How stunning to see the cast list and recognize not only Sam Waterston but also Martin Kove ("Cagney & Lacey," "The Karate Kid") and Salome Jens ("Sisters," "Star Trek: Deep Space Nine") among the credits.

It's worth a view for the bizarrity alone. Add the delicious pleasure of seeing currently working (and in some cases successful) actors in this odd film, and you have the makings of a twisted conversation piece.

Nutshell: Watch it in a darkened room with off-the-wall company and come away with a somewhat surreal residual buzz.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed