There are things that you can pull out of this era that are very much around now with the concept of removing people from their work because they have different ideas/beliefs, but now that is being done by "the mob" rather than the government/management. Eerily similar, but this is from a quainter time of red fear. Worth seeing.
6 Reviews
Hollywood Ten Heroes? More like zeros
ntvnyr3010 November 2017
I saw this on TCM and it was introduced by Ben Mankiewicz who called this the "darkest period" in American history. The House Un-American Activities Committee investigated Hollywood for communist influences and the result was the infamous "Hollywood Ten". The Hollywood Ten were communist sympathizers--some were former sympathizers, others still believed in the cause. They were correctly blacklisted for years. These were not innocent men who were being crucified for mere political beliefs. Communism is antithetical to the American way of life. So these Hollywood Ten slimeballs believed in an idea to subvert the American way of life, then tried to hide behind the Constitution. That sounds pretty hypocritical to me. They were not and never will be heroes, despite how Hollywood tries to make them out to be saintly victims.
A "Must" For Students Of The Time
dougdoepke17 June 2019
On the whole, the 105-minutes presents an impartial documentary on procedures leading up to Hollywood's post-war blacklist, along with later commentary from many of those involved. The first part is spent on footage from congressional committee's investigations of 1947 headed up by Parnell Thomas. It was from these hearings, rather than Sen. McCarthy's controversial probes of the early 50's, that the Hollywood purges were ignited.
Actually, as the docu points out, the blacklisting itself was initiated by studio moguls at a 1947 meeting at the Waldorf Astoria in NYC. There the moneymen were understandably concerned with audience fallout from what the hearings had revealed. After all, the Cold War was just then heating up, and commies had now replaced fascists as the official enemy. So a number of movie pro's were caught in the sudden switchover. Then too, many of the same lefties were active in efforts to unionize studio craft workers, also bitterly battled by the moguls. So the stage was set.
The second part focuses mainly on interviews with "The Hollywood 10", including Trumbo, Cole, Dmytryk, et. al, along with adversaries like Reagan and Wheeler. These are illuminating given the 20-some years that had passed since the blacklisting events. It's these interviews, that, unlike the first part, are not found anywhere else, at least that I've seen. On the whole, there's very little voice-over narration, more of which at times might have been helpful in tying parts together.
All in all, the assembled footage presents a live glimpse of a controversial period in America's political life. And perhaps just as importantly, without clear partisanship, though the interviews are weighted towards those who lost their jobs as a result of the process. Thus the film's essential viewing for those concerned with constitutional principles when these are put to the dramatic test.
Actually, as the docu points out, the blacklisting itself was initiated by studio moguls at a 1947 meeting at the Waldorf Astoria in NYC. There the moneymen were understandably concerned with audience fallout from what the hearings had revealed. After all, the Cold War was just then heating up, and commies had now replaced fascists as the official enemy. So a number of movie pro's were caught in the sudden switchover. Then too, many of the same lefties were active in efforts to unionize studio craft workers, also bitterly battled by the moguls. So the stage was set.
The second part focuses mainly on interviews with "The Hollywood 10", including Trumbo, Cole, Dmytryk, et. al, along with adversaries like Reagan and Wheeler. These are illuminating given the 20-some years that had passed since the blacklisting events. It's these interviews, that, unlike the first part, are not found anywhere else, at least that I've seen. On the whole, there's very little voice-over narration, more of which at times might have been helpful in tying parts together.
All in all, the assembled footage presents a live glimpse of a controversial period in America's political life. And perhaps just as importantly, without clear partisanship, though the interviews are weighted towards those who lost their jobs as a result of the process. Thus the film's essential viewing for those concerned with constitutional principles when these are put to the dramatic test.
An important and historical register on Hollywood's red scare
Rodrigo_Amaro9 September 2015
"Hollywood on Trial" presents a detailed account on one of the darkest and most shameful periods of Hollywood history with the red scare and the House of Un-American Activities Committee investigation on writers, directors, actors and others who were considered subversive and sympathizers of the Communism. Narrated by the great John Huston, the documentary gives us an insightful chronology of events about the committee's works, from the Hollywood Ten trails and imprisonment, to the loud hearings of the 1950's involving not only the persecuted figures but also friendly witnesses of the committee who helped them by denouncing their friends and colleagues on the industry in order to whether keep the Communists away from the movies or to guarantee their future safe in the film business by not being blacklisted.
David Helpern's film was released in 1976, same year Martin Ritt's "The Front" introduced the period to new audiences with a story focusing a persecuted writer, played by Woody Allen, who continues to write his movies, despite being blacklisted, by asking his friends to be his front and take credit for his productions. A year before both movies, the House of Un-American Activities ceased their works and by that time many of the people imprisoned due to their investigations and prosecutions already had ended their jail sentences but Hollywood was still touchy in remembering that era, with only a few notable individuals returning their careers back on track.
Interviewed here are some of the Hollywood Ten such as Dalton Trumbo, Ring Lardner Jr., Lester Cole (the whole group can be seen in "The Hollywood Ten" documentary, with some clips introduced here), a brief interview with Zero Mostel who was persecuted in real life and also plays a pivotal dramatical role in "The Front" - his interview was right on Ritt's film set; and there's also the voice from members of the committee, and Edward Dmytryk, film director who named names and continued his career in the 1950's to much acclaim. The first mentioned people are known for their bravery and courage while taking the fifth amendment and refusing to testify to the committee on personal and moral grounds, a true act of defiance that cost them deeply with years in jail and being shut out of Hollywood for a period, with many of them writing films with the use of a front (Dalton Trumbo wrote "The Brave One", won an Oscar but the award was given to the name who received the credits on screen, someone who didn't exist, actually. Many years later, the Academy gave him the award and stated him as the one who wrote the movie). Their testimony to the movie is the one that captures our attention for the details they provide about how they survived through this dark moment, how they were incredibly secure about their thoughts and actions, rarely frightened of the possibility of losing everything and go to jail for their freedom of speech. Even though, it's years later from all that, they never admit in the film about being Communists or sympathizers so it feels like a lot like "Guilty by Suspicion" (1991), a case where liberal figures were put along next to the Reds simply for defending positive ideals that weren't the norm back in the 1950's. Dmytryk, on the other side of the fence, isn't much passionate or compelling about why he acted that way, throwing his fellow colleagues into the mud. Kazan isn't even here.
Mr. Halpern's film is a great historical lesson to those who doesn't know anything or know very little about Hollywood's witch hunt, it presents facts and informations without overcharging the viewers with too much information, it's all very precise, amazingly rich in images of the period, the films responsible for scaring audiences about the perils of the URSS regime, plus the interviews in the 1970's. A must-see. 9/10
David Helpern's film was released in 1976, same year Martin Ritt's "The Front" introduced the period to new audiences with a story focusing a persecuted writer, played by Woody Allen, who continues to write his movies, despite being blacklisted, by asking his friends to be his front and take credit for his productions. A year before both movies, the House of Un-American Activities ceased their works and by that time many of the people imprisoned due to their investigations and prosecutions already had ended their jail sentences but Hollywood was still touchy in remembering that era, with only a few notable individuals returning their careers back on track.
Interviewed here are some of the Hollywood Ten such as Dalton Trumbo, Ring Lardner Jr., Lester Cole (the whole group can be seen in "The Hollywood Ten" documentary, with some clips introduced here), a brief interview with Zero Mostel who was persecuted in real life and also plays a pivotal dramatical role in "The Front" - his interview was right on Ritt's film set; and there's also the voice from members of the committee, and Edward Dmytryk, film director who named names and continued his career in the 1950's to much acclaim. The first mentioned people are known for their bravery and courage while taking the fifth amendment and refusing to testify to the committee on personal and moral grounds, a true act of defiance that cost them deeply with years in jail and being shut out of Hollywood for a period, with many of them writing films with the use of a front (Dalton Trumbo wrote "The Brave One", won an Oscar but the award was given to the name who received the credits on screen, someone who didn't exist, actually. Many years later, the Academy gave him the award and stated him as the one who wrote the movie). Their testimony to the movie is the one that captures our attention for the details they provide about how they survived through this dark moment, how they were incredibly secure about their thoughts and actions, rarely frightened of the possibility of losing everything and go to jail for their freedom of speech. Even though, it's years later from all that, they never admit in the film about being Communists or sympathizers so it feels like a lot like "Guilty by Suspicion" (1991), a case where liberal figures were put along next to the Reds simply for defending positive ideals that weren't the norm back in the 1950's. Dmytryk, on the other side of the fence, isn't much passionate or compelling about why he acted that way, throwing his fellow colleagues into the mud. Kazan isn't even here.
Mr. Halpern's film is a great historical lesson to those who doesn't know anything or know very little about Hollywood's witch hunt, it presents facts and informations without overcharging the viewers with too much information, it's all very precise, amazingly rich in images of the period, the films responsible for scaring audiences about the perils of the URSS regime, plus the interviews in the 1970's. A must-see. 9/10
Dated
drjgardner12 November 2017
This is a tough film to rate. In 1976 it would rate an 8 because it was revealing a topic that was being hidden. In 2017 you won't find much new here nor will it seem so strange.
The bottom line, of course, is that the film industry is not exempt from political influence, as if anyone needed to know that today. But even in the 40s and 50s, the film industry had already gone through the political editing for sexual content, and certainly the war films of the 40s were in response to political initiatives.
This film is well worth watching, but it will seem tame now.
The bottom line, of course, is that the film industry is not exempt from political influence, as if anyone needed to know that today. But even in the 40s and 50s, the film industry had already gone through the political editing for sexual content, and certainly the war films of the 40s were in response to political initiatives.
This film is well worth watching, but it will seem tame now.
Good Documentary
Michael_Elliott13 November 2017
Hollywood on Trial (1976)
*** (out of 4)
In 1975 The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) was basically closed and it ended a very dark period for both the government and Hollywood. The following year Hollywood would somewhat fight back or show their side with the release of this documentary as well as the Woody Allen film THE FRONT.
Of the two, there's no question that THE FRONT is the better of the two but this documentary serves an important purpose because it does feature some terrific footage from the actual trials as well as some current interviews that are rather priceless and especially since so many of those people are no longer with us. We get interviews from the likes of Edward Dmytryk, Otto Preminger, Martin Ritt, Ronald Reagan and various others.
John Huston serves as the narrator and he's got a terrific voice so listening to him is a major plus. For the most part Hollywood ON TRIAL is a film that will appeal to history and film buffs but at the same time there have been better documents out there. This one here is a bit too dry for its own good but one must remember that it was the first to tackle the subject.
*** (out of 4)
In 1975 The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) was basically closed and it ended a very dark period for both the government and Hollywood. The following year Hollywood would somewhat fight back or show their side with the release of this documentary as well as the Woody Allen film THE FRONT.
Of the two, there's no question that THE FRONT is the better of the two but this documentary serves an important purpose because it does feature some terrific footage from the actual trials as well as some current interviews that are rather priceless and especially since so many of those people are no longer with us. We get interviews from the likes of Edward Dmytryk, Otto Preminger, Martin Ritt, Ronald Reagan and various others.
John Huston serves as the narrator and he's got a terrific voice so listening to him is a major plus. For the most part Hollywood ON TRIAL is a film that will appeal to history and film buffs but at the same time there have been better documents out there. This one here is a bit too dry for its own good but one must remember that it was the first to tackle the subject.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
