The Twilight Zone (TV Series 1985–1989) Poster

(1985–1989)

User Reviews

Review this title
49 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Very Good, But A Tough Act To Follow...
DeanNYC18 February 2007
The 1985 version of "The Twilight Zone" begins with a major disadvantage: it trailed the original Rod Serling vintage 1960s version! That original series was, and continues to be, the Gold Standard for programs of this type and for better or worse it's unlikely that any show in its wake could achieve that level of greatness.

However, this second attempt did have some positives going for it: First, it featured stories from a host of brilliant s/f writers, including such iconic names as Ray Bradbury, Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen King, just to name three. And it had the advantage of better special effects, and color photography.

Unfortunately, the parallels to the original series meant this one was doomed to be considered an also ran, which is a shame, because there were some incredible episodes that I would rank among the best of any science fiction program from any era.

Examples: The astonishing "Profile In Silver" tells the story of a time traveling distant relation to John F. Kennedy, who goes to Dallas in 1963, intending to document, but then preventing the assassination of the President, which creates some surprising results. A remarkable story that is most certainly worthy of the "TZ" moniker.

The amusing "I Of Newton" tells of a professor who offhandedly says he would sell his soul to calculate an equation, but then has to try to back out of the deal when the devil shows up in his classroom to claim it. This is reminiscent of many of the humorous episodes from the original series.

They even did a "remake" of a few eps, like "Button Button," where an impoverished couple was offered the chance to receive a large cash amount if they simply pressed a button. The catch: someone they didn't know would die.

There were some hits and misses in this series, and to a degree, it did often reflect the mentality of the 1980s, rather than tell stories that had a "timeless" quality, which is another disadvantage it has to the original series, but it is most certainly worthy of bearing the name, and is worth seeking out, either on reruns or DVD.
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
If Rod Serling was watching this, he would most likely be proud
abrown9756 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This is such a great reincarnation of the iconic anthology series. Narrated by a man with such an unforgettable voice such as Charles Aidman, this series had such great tales. Scary, lesson-teaching, feel-good, comedy, or just plain ironic, the 1985 version of the Twilight Zone has left its mark on the people of the world. With such acclaimed actors like Bruce Willis, Melinda Dillon, Robert Klein, Morgan Freeman, Martin Landau, Charles Martin Smith, Frances McDormand, Frances Conroy, Victor Garber, Richard Kiley, George Wendt, Jeffrey Tambor, Helen Mirren, Elliot Gould, John Carradine, Ralph Bellamy, and more guest starring in many of the episodes, this has certainly left me begging for more from the writers, hoping that maybe, just maybe, they might try to reincarnate it again. Go Twilight Zone!
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Stories so unique they can only be found in....................
Doramius113 January 2005
Rod Serling's series is resurrected and given new sparkle as these episodes were released in the mid-80's. They still capture the twist and intensity that the original Twilight Zone offered. Using a strong cast and many new names, at the time, the stories were able to keep viewers on the edge of their toes.

Season 1 has currently been released on DVD. Nostalgic enthusiasts who remember the show well may strongly be interested in adding this to their collection. Great stories like 'Button, Button', 'If She Dies', 'Kentucky Rye', and 'Nightcrawlers' have won fans over for the series.

I feel that in it's day, the people who set up the program schedules didn't really give it a chance. Though this is personal opinion, I believe that they had done that with several shows with strong potential. Great collection to add for any Zone Fanatic.
21 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A fantastic series that CBS deliberately threw away
Marta2 August 1999
I'm a big fan of the original Twilight Zone, and just as big a fan of this reworking of the 1960's anthology series. My family was thrilled in 1985 that the series had been resurrected. We watched it faithfully every week, no matter what strange day or time slot CBS moved it to and they moved it around to a new time slot each and every week it seemed. It was not a retread of the original show but an updated, modern incarnation that stood on its own. It featured amazing shows which were adaptations of short stories by acclaimed writers.

In the wasteland of 80's TV it stood out for its ingenuity and originality. Alan Brennert's "Her Pilgrim Soul" was, for me, the single best episode produced for weekly series TV since the original went off the air. For my husband it was "Profiles in Silver", a "what if?" for JFK fans. "Nightcrawlers" was a true imaginative nightmare that no one forgot once they watched it. "A Message from Charity" is the second favorite episode for most of the people I talk to. But with the network moving the show around to different days it became hard to find in the listings, and people gradually stopped looking for it because it was too difficult to keep track of. In short, CBS never gave this series the chance it deserved, and it sank into oblivion where the final insult was badly butchered episodes thrown into a syndication package. But despite this the series refused to fade away in fans' memories.

Finally, the first two seasons and the syndie third season (which for the most part is completely forgettable) are out on DVD. They are virtually uncut; some music has been replaced, and there are a few other anomalies. These wonderful stories haven't been seen in their entirety since the series aired over 20 years ago, until now. There are commentaries by Alan Brennert, Harlan Ellison, Phil DeGuere, actors, directors, writers, etc.

This is a must-have for all fans of the Twilight Zone no matter what incarnation, and Night Gallery as well. In many respects this show is a blend of the spirit of the original Twilight Zone and Night Gallery; it uses quality stories by many of the classic sci-fi and horror writers of the past forty years. TV in this new millennium is a wasteland of garbage and nauseous reality TV, and we could use stories and writers like this today. The 1980's Twilight Zone deserves to be seen as the classic it is, and this DVD release does it justice.
59 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
If you didn't watch it-you missed out!
ChillyWhacked26 December 2008
I honestly don't understand why someone would give a negative review for this show. To say it was "garbage" -as one commenter stated- is very inaccurate. I watched this show as a child...in fact, I grew up on it. The story lines were dark and original. The acting was actually pretty good in my estimation. Especially in comparison to the overabundance of bad acting in that day. The stories were so eerie and unique that they stayed in my head decades after I saw them. I actually had the pleasure of watching several episodes at a friends house recently and loved the nostalgic feelings they brought back. They were even more enjoyable now that I am older. I was able to pick up on the stuff that I had missed as a kid. My faves are the one about the man that was court ordered to be "invisible" for a year, the woman that had a magic necklace and could freeze the world by saying "shut up!", the woman that got offered a box with a button in it...and if she pressed the button she would win a large sum of money...but then a stranger had to be killed and SO many others!
31 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fantastic Series. Why oh why not on DVD?
Apollo_115 May 2004
I remember the "new" series of The Twilight Zone with much fondness. I grew up with them. I don't remember many films/TV programs from childhood, but one episode from this series stood out for me more than any other. It was called "The Burning Man" and it was the most eerie piece of film making I had ever witnessed as a kid. In fact it first inspired me to start film directing.

I know now that this short episode came from a book by Ray Bradbury, but it was the way the short film was shot that awe-inspired me. I seem to remember it featured a young Danny Cooksey as the kid. Had Piper Laurie in it too.

Please CBS, bring them out on DVD. (And do it proper with extra features!)
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Twilight Zone 1980's: not as good as the original,but has its moments
moshomaniac19 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
As stated before on this site, I am a HUGE fan of the original 1959 Twilight Zone. Released a decade after the death of Rod Serling, how could they pull it off? Twilight Zone: the movie from 1983 was a notorious disappointment for most fans. Would this series give us the Twilight Zone for the next generation we were waiting for? Well,This series from the 1980s tried its best to recapture the sense of the fantastic from the original, with mixed results. I was 4 years old when this was first Broadcast on T.V., and remembered almost nothing about it. I recently started watching it off Netflix. I have been approaching the series objectively, trying to be not be discriminate and giving the benefit of the doubt. It is my belief that no series will reach the level of sheer brilliance as the original twilight zone, that being said, this series is OK. It has its good and its bad. Here are some of the episodes I've seen so far that I have liked:

1)The Card: This is the scariest episode I've seen so far, involving a shopaholic mom with a very unusual credit card. When she fails to keep up with her bills, the company begins repossessing everything she owns. If this doesn't make you pay your bill on time, nothing will. 2)The Paladin of the lost hour: A man who is responsible for a lost hour left over from the when the pope changed the calendar long ago must find a replacement to pass the watch onto, or time will end. 3) Dealer's Choice: Directed by Wes Craven! A group of friends during a poker game have a DEVIL of a time when a new player joins them one faithful evening. 4)Dead Woman's Shoes: A woman puts on a pair of shoes donated to a thrift store and becomes possessed by their previous owner. 5)The misfortune cookie: A notoriously picky food critic goes to Chinese restaurant and trashes the food before he even eats it. His fortune cookie he receives gives him exactly what he deserves. 6)Act Break: a struggling play producer finds a magic pendant that allows him 2 wished. He wishes to have the greatest playwright in the world. The wish is granted....as he is transported back in the time of William Shakespere. 7)Ye Gods: probably the funniest one on the series, a man encountered Cupid, who tries to make him fall in love, but Cupid can't seem to do his job right because he has had a bad breakup with another Greek God. 8)If she dies: a little girl is put in a coma after a car accident, and her father buys a crib from a church going out of business in hopes that a ghost girl will cure her. As stated, this series tries it hardest, but it doesn't quite cut the mustard of being the definitive follow-up to the twilight zone. But for what it is, it is watchable. If you are interested, give it a shot.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
In the Zone
hellraiser79 January 2016
This show is another relic from my childhood and it's my fourth favorite anthology horrors and TV shows of all time. At the time I never even knew about the original Twilight Zone, so in a way this show was my way to it. Some would say that this show is not as good as the original but lets face it, the original is a tough act to follow. What makes this version stand out for me is that it's not trying to, it's trying to do it's own thing but at the same time stay true to the spirit of it's predecessor.

The effects are solid, well OK not all but effects for me aren't what make this show but really the storytelling and there are lots of great stories in this show that are great editions to the Twilight Zone mythos. I really love the theme opening which is another one of my favorite themes, it's also one of the creepiest one's I've ever seen up there with the openings of "Tales from the Darkside" and "Are you Afraid of the Dark" as we see some globe come through a window and there are some random bizarre images along with really creepy tunes from a carousel horse, a creepy looking doll, a nuke explosion. But that opening perfectly set the tone for the anthology where anything can go and anything is possible.

This show also had a lot of well known directors and writers whom have contributed to this show. Directors like the late great Wes Craven, Joe Dante, etc. Down to some writers like one of my favorite sci-fi writers "Greg Bear" if you can believe that, J.Michael Strynski, Steven King, etc. These facts make watching the show all the more interesting just to see their imput/contributions to the Twilight Zone mythos.

There are plenty of memorable stories a few of my favorites are "Matter of Minutes" which is a bizarre story that really tackles a very interesting concept about time. "Profile in Silver" this story predates Steven King's "11/22/63" as both uncannily have the same plot line about a man traveling back in time to prevent the assassination but comes back with mixed results. "His Pilgrim Soul" which was written and directed by Wes Craven is a really bittersweet tale that can really tug at your heartstrings. And of course my favorite "Dead Run" which is thrilling and really takes some turns you'd never see coming.

The 80's Twilight Zone is a dimension worth visiting.

Rating: 4 stars
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A door closes, a window opens
gizmomogwai14 February 2020
The Twilight Zone (1959-1964) was a great show; the first revival (1985-1989) set a precedent for its resurrection, an exercise that's been repeated twice more. The '80s TZ makes some changes from Serling's old format. We never see the narrator; there isn't narration for the opening and closing of every story. But I actually think that's respectable - I really felt, watching the first season, that the makers recognized their show couldn't be the same as Serling's, and thought it was more important to try to capture the spirit of it. Also notable is that, despite the fact that non-sitcoms are expected to have hour-long episodes, the makers evidently agreed with Serling that the stories shouldn't be that long, telling two to three stories per episode. The flash of Serling in the new opening is a nice touch to show how important they felt it was to get the spirit right.

The problem in trying to capture the spirit of the original TZ is that the '80s series is inconsistent. It's hard to rate individual episodes, in fact, when the segments within the episodes are inconsistent - "To See the Invisible Man" is a novel concept but is followed by something stupid (and stupidly titled) like "Tooth and Consequences." ("The Elevator" is also in there- creepy and atmospheric, well made, though not totally TZ-esque). "Take My Life...Please!" is a weak piece that sets up "Devil's Alphabet", which is well made and atmospheric.

There are some great stories in season 1: "Nightcrawlers" features some phenomenal acting from Scott Paulin and spectacular scenes recalling the nightmare of the Vietnam War. Ditto Glynn Turman in "Paladin of the Lost Hour", despite the humiliating fact that episode was directed by Alan Smithee.

Ultimately, would Serling approve? I think, in answering that question, you have to keep in mind the fact that Serling himself wasn't infallible. There are less than stellar episodes of the original, and he personally wrote several of them.

Unfortunately, there's a noticeable quality drop in season 2, when the network began to lose faith in the show. "Nightsong" is soap opera-esque and predictable; something like "Lost and Found" is a jokey throwaway before going into "The World Next Door" which is a drag despite starring Jeffrey Tambor (who appeared in the brilliant "Dead Woman's Shoes", a superior reimagining of an original TZ episode). However, "Shelter Skelter" is great, followed by "Private Channel" which is gripping enough. The quality drop is steeper and more severe in season 3, where the narrator Charles Aidman (who didn't really sound like Serling but had the right tone) was replaced by Robin Ward, who sounded way too upbeat. The acting across season 3 becomes, on average, terrible; the production values are sacrificed. That said, there's still some great work here; I particularly found "The Hellgramite Method" terrifying. Altogether, the '80s TZ is head and shoulders above the 2000s version, but neither can touch Serling.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An Honest Review
generationofswine11 October 2020
Yeah, for the longest time I thought I was the only person that actually liked this, but thanks to the internet I now know that I'm not alone.

And, like the first series, you get your fill of horror and science fiction ironic twists... more with an eye to horror in the 80s version and not so much science fiction. And one episode that seems like an updated Wicker Man.

Anyway, everything has been said already, so the best thing I can do is point out that it had everyone. I mean it had EVERYONE, every actor that wasn't a leading man in the 80s and some actors that were, it had has beens and will bes in it.

You're going to sit down and spend and episode screaming "Oh! I know him from!"

And in 2020, pure nostalgia.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So many stories were so lackluster
bgaiv8 June 2021
I was at the age when this came out that I should have loved it, but somehow it rarely seemed to click. There were some great stories that I still remember all these years later, like the Bruce Willis one and the "shut up" lady, the one where the secret to life is driving people insane, the one where the boy and girl are telepathically connected across time.

Still, so often it seemed like missed opportunities. The "shut up" lady one, "A Little Peace and Quiet" really stuck with me. I thought for years what that poor lady could do at the end. But the episode was short and was mainly her annoying day to day life. While that wasn't very pleasant (kind of the point) it seemed like it could have been fleshed out.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Magic TV
Cristi_Ciopron26 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
What is a philosophical short—story? Does it still keep a core of thought? Of philosophical thought, that is? Does this thought still matter—or it is only the originality, charm and fun of the execution and wit that we are after? Does the philosophical premise still count? Is it of any interest, for such a story to be a success ?Is this core of thought and speculation important in itself, or only a pretext, interesting only insofar it generates something other—a fable, a parable, an allegory, a symbolical tale?Is the philosophy left outside—and only the execution and style matters? Is it thought? Is it art, i.e. "only" form, style? Borges confessed that thought, even metaphysical thought, can be put into stories—into philosophical short—stories. That there is in them a meaning and a thought. (Borges liked allegories, symbols, keys, and I think he considered, like the much greater Chesterton before him, that 'Jekyll' has a meaning, that it is allegorical, symbolical …). The only meaning of art is artistry itself? Can art convey metaphysical meanings, deep truths, a real and incisive thought (that is, beyond the matters of art and representation) ?What is to be admired? Only the skill of creating shapes and charms? Is it a deeper meaning to be conveyed? Has philosophical art any meaning? The formalists ,like Nabokov and Zarifopol, will answer no—the object of art is indifferent ,the only meaning is the implicit artistry; the _phenomenologist writers like Camil Petrescu and Paleologu will answer—in a certain sense, yes (more often the art is philosophical when it intends to be truly artistic; the fidelity to the real, not the parable, symbol, allegory , is the right approach; a philosophical notion as such would betray and damage the art and the truthfulness ); the allegorical—minded, like Chesterton and his partial follower and admirer Borges will utter an yes. Tournier would be of the same opinion, too, as he explicitly developed his ideas of narration.

Is it anything to be admired, beyond or aside the formal achievement? Do ideas generate emotions? Are conceptions heart—warming? As an (abstract) philosophical program, thought can spoil the art. But given as an artistic intuition? And does thought subsist as such, when it is transformed into artistic intuition? Does it still have any existence as such, as thought? Is it 'only' vision, or thought subsists ? The so—termed First revival of the Twilight Zone,seen by me when I was 11 yrs. (that is,some 6—7 yrs. after its first episodes began being aired) may help us to answer these questions.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than the original in some way worse in others.
mm-3921 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
The original series had some great classic shows like Terror at 20 000 ft, To serve man etc. Regrettably some long winded social message ones like Monster due on main street. Nothing will replace Rod Serling's narrative camera shot intros, with cigarette in hand! Smart not try and find a Rod clone for the remake! What works for the 20 plus years installment of The Twilight Zone from the 80's was not trying to be too much like the original but similar in the essence of the previous series. Instead of one whole show which can drag out there was two sometime and more installments for the show which never drag out a preach story, but too short sometimes for a classic story for some installments. I like it. Rod may not be there but many famous short stories and authors like Stephen King created some brilliant material. Some episodes are funny, serious, others flop but over all worth watching. 7 stars.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The most HORRIBLE incarnation of The Twilight Zone of all.
daleover17 June 2019
I don't write reviews that often but after seeing so many inexplicable positive reviews for this trash I had to say something. We all know the original Twilight Zone was great. This is not a comparison review at all, what Rod did at the time he did it cannot be replicated and that's that. Now about THIS version. METV for some crazy reason recently started airing the 85' version of TW, these are stories cut from the original airings of 3 stories in an hour episode whittled down to 1 story in a half hour. Which is fine with me I've never liked the hour episodes of any of my old favorite "fantasy" shows. Plus I don't have to sit through 3 of these vomitous airings in an hour. METV has aired and I've DV'red about six of these so far, I've watched all six and instantly remembered why I hated them when they first aired. (Yes I'm that old, but not old enough for the first series). I can't give you just one reason not to watch these shows, other than they are completely unentertaining. Imagine combining The Love Boat (because of the not so famous actor cameos), with those old After School Specials ( because of the cheesy message each one tries to preach. That's basically the quality you get. JUST STAY AWAY!!,
7 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Makes you realize how good it was
gmurdock1 October 2002
Warning: Spoilers
The newest version of the Twilight Zone that premiered in September, 2002, makes me realize just how good the 1985 series was. They were so good, in fact, I still remember some of my favourite episodes: the relative of JFK who went back in time and ends up stopping the assassination, the Viet Nam vet whose afraid to go to sleep, the man who must become 'invisible' for one year....ah, those were the days. I was excited a few years back to see them running in syndication only to realize that the episodes had been chopped down and key scenes removed (to fit into a half hour block instead of an hour). This made me stop watching them. I hope that CBS will release the full original uncut 1985 Twilight Zone on DVD someday, but it's probably going to be a long wait.
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A decent, though not spectacular, reboot of the old Rod Serling series
llltdesq17 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This is the first of two re-workings of the original Twilight Zone series created by Rod Serling. There will be mild spoilers ahead:

This was a reasonably good attempt to bring back the old Twilight Zone series. Alan Brennert served as the executive story consultant, at various points both Harlan Ellison and George RR Martin were significantly involved in the show, some excellent stories were used as the starting point for scripts, including The Last Defender of Camelot by Roger Zelazny, Nightcrawlers by Robert R. McCammon, Shatterday and Paladin of the Lost Hour by Harlan Ellison, A Saucer of Loneliness by Theodore Sturgeon and The Star by Arthur C. Clarke, among others, while original scripts were done by Brennert, Martin, Ray Bradbury, David Gerrold and others. The talent was there, the first season was reasonably strong and there was much to like about the show. The show lasted two seasons on CBS and had a third in syndication. So what went wrong?

For one thing, there was no Rod Serling. The shows were, frankly, all over the map. There was no real unifying vision to set just what a "Twilight Zone" story was. For another, 1985 was not 1959. The show had an all too familiar feel to it, so the novelty wore off quickly. There were more options for the audience. When the first series was on, there was no cable TV, there were no VCRs and most people had only three channels from which to choose.

Finally, it stood in the rather long shadow of the original, from which it could not escape. The series more or less holds up even today, but there are more misfires in the 1985 version than there were in the 1959 version.

This is available on DVD and is worth revisiting if you enjoyed it when it was on. Recommended.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Post Rod Serling Dead Woman's Shoes version
enziangenciana1 December 2012
Rod Serling would have been so thrilled about what came out from the 80's version of "Dead Woman's Shoes" which picked up from where Rod ended. Helen Mirren contributed to most of it. This episode was used to prove how much a woman could change after getting a new pair of shoes. Her grooming was dramatically a lot more notorious than what it was before she tried them on. This version had more dimensions that the first one didn't have, such as two different appearances paired w/personalities for the same woman. Viewers couldn't tell that Helen Mirren was the same woman before and after getting her new outfit. Helen Mirren looked so much different from the time that she was at the thrift store an the time that she was walking down the stairs. The bathroom scene was the transition
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A decent reboot
safenoe26 January 2022
After the tragic events in the Twilight Zone movie, this reboot (the first of three) is an honorable homage to the 60s original. Of course nothing can match Rod Serling's original and John J. O'Connor of the New York Times wrote in 1994 that "the new version of the series that started in 1985 failed."

But I don't think it's a failure because the spirit was still there, and besides, it was the 80s.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Magic!
CinefanR26 February 2012
There is something about the 1985 "Twilight Zone" that makes it fascinating. It's that unique charm of the 80's, the intelligent writing, its ability to surprise, the eerie and mysterious atmosphere -who could forget the intro? The show also brings back memories from those times, which makes it a personal experience. But "Twilight Zone" is above all a document of the 80's, so if you want to emerge yourself in that era, for study or pleasure, this is it.

Even if a few stories don't excel in originality, the narrator's spoken lines are always so well put, it's exhilarating. My favorite episodes include "I of Newton", "Kentucky Rye", "A Small Talent for War", "But Can she type", just to name a few. There are many others, priceless pieces of story telling that make outstanding television, especially today. "Twilight Zone" is always thought provoking, poignant, insightful and simply magic – qualities that I couldn't find in the earlier black & white version or the more recent revival. The 80's version beats the original by far, in my opinion.

This is a review on the First Season of Twilight Zone. The second season is simply unwatchable. There's no trace of the Zone's mystery, the scripts, the actors and the direction are lousy. Stick to season 1.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Awesome!
PeterRoeder17 May 2009
Here is my short review of the best episodes: 1. Shatterday: Excellent split-personality episode with Bruce Willis. One of the best all time episodes. 2. A Little Peace and Quiet: Also very strong. The final image is unforgettable. 3.Wordplay: Very interesting episode about language 4.Dreams for Sale: Terrifyingly scary sci-fi horror. Very spooky episode. 5.Children's Zoo: One of the best. The idea which is expressed in this episode is very significant. 6.Nightcrawlers: Also one of the best episodes. Very intense.7.Teacher's Aide: Terrifying episode about a monster on a school 8.The Shadown Man: One of the most powerful episodes with a terrifying ending. 9.The Beacon: Very nice Lovecrafian horror - also with a very spooky ending 10.The misfortune cookie: Great tale.11.Button,button: Also a great tale by a legendary storyteller.12.Shadow Play: Awesome movie about dreams and how they impact on our lives. But actually I think all the episodes are strong. Some are better than others but I have never come across a really bad episode neither in the 60s version or in the 80s.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fantastic
bobgray-34 September 2019
That's all. Great revamping of The TZ. I loved every minute of it.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
More like Twilight Zone Lite
greensweater3 July 2009
I have a weakness for anthology shows- you name it, I've watched it, from the brilliant (the original Twilight Zone, Night Gallery), to the down right cheesy (Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction anyone?) As you can see, I don't really discriminate. I had always heard about how good the Twilight Zone's 80's incarnation was, yet had never gotten to see it, since it was rarely ever aired.

After finally seeing it, I have to say, it misses the bite of the original. Many of these episodes are missing those shock and awe endings that were the hallmark of the series.

These episodes have more of a sentimental 'Kick the Can' feel to them- not to say that it's terrible. Yet, take a a somewhat schmaltzy episode from the original series, like 'The Hunt', and there is still that strange, eerie, uneasiness running throughout. We as the audience are left hanging as the protagonists, a man and his dog are unsure they've made the right choice in destination until the very end. Contrast that with, say 'Grace Note', in which a put-upon, sacrificing, aspiring opera singer is given a gift and a glimpse into the future by her dying younger sister- and well you can guess the ending of that one. The difference of tone is evident. Not to say that I didn't well up a little here and there, yet many episodes felt like they would be more at home on another 80's anthology show; the Stephen Spielberg produced, Amazing Stories.

Also there were too many retreads, like a pointless 10 minute remake of The After Hours. All in all, I would say that it's watchable, but I could definitely see why this didn't last for very long. Not exactly as Disney-schmaltzy as Amazing Stories, yet not as in your-face-bizarre as Tales from the Darkside.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An outstanding series
nlstock11 February 2004
Here's hoping that the 1985 and 1986 versions of The Twilight Zone will one day be released on DVD as it was an outstanding series with well written episodes. The beginning titles have a half-second animation of Rod Serling in them as a salute to the originator of the series. The episode "Nightcrawlers" was directed by William Freidkin and is brilliant. One episode called "Shatterday" features the TV debut of Bruce Willis. There is also a small budget third season which was made after cancellation to make up the numbers for syndication,but it's budget was small and apart from one good episode,where a man is possessed by what looks like Christ,it is a poor third season. But the first two seasons are brilliant.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Wonderful Show
aolobe29 January 2019
I wasn't really a fan of the original Twilight Zone but when this came on I was hooked. It was among the shows that started off my weekend, along with Friday the 13th The Series, Freddy's Nightmares, Monsters and Tales from the Darkside. I would always look forward to the newest episodes and watched them religiously. What also peaked my interest was a couple of Stephen King's stories made it into the show and being a fan of his works really got my interest more. It was a shame that this show was buried by CBS, the same with the other previous shows I listed that were "black listed" by the "bible belt". Shows like these are few and far between and I am glad I have gotten the full series on DVD to watch until my hearts content.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not as good as the original, but very good !!
afonsobritofalves11 November 2018
Although not as good as the original "The Twilight Zone" remains very good; Each episode looks better, with a better and better story that if it were seen separately with a short one, for example, it would not have been funny. One of the best horror series ever. Highly recommend.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed