Child's Play 2 (1990) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
273 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Satisfactory sequel
bowmanblue31 August 2014
If you never saw the first 'Child's Play' film... it's about a serial killer whose soul gets trapped inside a children's doll and then goes on to persecute the poor little boy (Andy Barclay) who buys him. Now, after sending the offending dolly back to hell, he's back again (you don't need to know how - basically the same way Freddy, Jason or Michael Myers always comes back - yet - again). And, guess what, Andy Barclay is top of his 'hit list.' Brad Dourif returns to voice the killer doll, Chucky, and he gets it right on the mark again. However, the story does get a little bit repetitive after a while. It focuses around no one believing Andy that his doll is alive (and evil), only to find they're proved wrong when the doll kills them in a grisly manner (rinse and repeat). Plus you can tell who's going to die a mile off - all the adults are pretty horrible and you won't really shed a tear when any of them get gutted. Then there are the lapses in physics, i.e. when a plastic doll can regularly overpower fully-grown adults.

However, despite all its flaw, Child's Play 2 just about does the job. If you liked the first one, this one does its best to keep the franchise going along the same lines. However, if you're new to the films, I'd start off with the first one (it's easily the best and scariest) before seeing if you want to watch this one, too.

http://thewrongtreemoviereviews.blogspot.co.uk/
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun sequel with a good cast
boyinflares14 April 2006
Child's Play 2 picks up not long after where its infamous predecessor left off, and straight into the film, the original Good Guy doll housing the spirit of the Lakeshore Strangler is being fixed up and Good Guys are back in action. While unfortunately, Chris Sarandon and Catherine Hicks do not return, they are at least mentioned, and given plausible reasons as to why they could not be in the movie. Innocent Andt Barclay (Alex Vincent) however returns, and is once again at the mercy of Chucky (voiced by the classic Brad Douriff) when Chucky traces Andy down to where he is living in foster care. From there, the typical mayhem follows, with plenty of doll-style murders, witty lines from Chucky and a great finale at the Good Guy doll factory.

While the original Child's Play is a terrifying classic, part 2 is somewhat of a step down, only because one knows what to expect, for the most part. However, the cast are a great asset to the film. Alex Vincent is right on the mark in his role as Andy, Christine Elise is terrific as his foster sister Kyle, and Jenny Agutter adds a touch of class as their foster mother Joanne Simpson. Gerrit Graham plays her strict husband, and Grace Zabriskie is good in her role as the career at the orphanage. Beth Grant steals the moment in her small role as Mrs Kettlewell however. Overall, a fun sequel to the original, with a well rounded cast and plenty of thrills to keep one entertained.
29 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not much more than a continuation, but still a worthy sequel.
Anonymous_Maxine2 December 2004
I think I liked Child's Play 2 more than most people, given the reviews that I've read and the movie's low voter rating on the IMDb. A cute kid's doll is once again the unlikely home of Charles Lee Ray, notorious serial killer, again feeding off of the surrealism created by seeing a kid's doll screw it's face into expressions of the purest rage and spouting all manner of profanities. By now, Ray is becoming more and more desperate to get out of the body of the doll, because as we were informed in the first film, if he spends too much time in that body he'll gradually become more and more human until one day he'll be stuck in it forever. Needless to say, Ray's a lot more interested in starting life over as a 6-year-old (and who wouldn't?) rather than spending the rest of his life as a plastic doll.

Although, given that he becomes more human the longer he is in that body, how human will he eventually become? Will he ever reach full human-hood? My guess is that he'll gradually approach being a real human being in a sort of half life, where he gets closer and closer and closer but never actually gets there, kind of like computer generated actors. There is currently much talk about how close computers can ever get to animating convincingly real people into the movies, and the leading theory seems to be something akin to my theory of Chucky turning human. He'll always get closer but he'll never get all the way there.

At any rate, Andy's mother has landed in a mental institution and Andy has been taken in by a foster family with appropriate mental vacuity to be a horror movie surrogate family. When Andy becomes frightened and runs through the house, his foster father grabs him and says, 'Rule #1, no running in the house!' OK, 'dad,' but not even when I open a closet and find myself confronted by the doll that landed my mom in the nuthouse and almost cost me my life and my very soul? My God, man, what the hell is this guy doing with a Good Guys doll in the house in the first place? It's difficult enough trying to figure out why it's even there WITHOUT having to watch this mental giant grab Andy by the arm and ask him what on earth is the matter.

There are some funny moments in the film, such as when Chucky smashes the head of the innocent Good Guys doll, buries it, and takes its place in the house, and my favorite, when Chucky is later addressed by a doting adult, Chucky responds by saying in his cute doll voice, 'Hi! I'm….Tommy!'

The stockholders in the Play Pal corporation are distressed over the suffering that the company has endured due to the negative publicity of the events of the first movie provide the premise for the movie's rather impressive finale. In order to generate a more positive image for the company and the doll, they have decided to reintroduce it into the market. The original Chucky doll was collected by the company and examined by toy-makers, who decided that there really was nothing truly wrong with it, it was not really a demon-possessed toy, so they decided to melt it down and remake it. Why they didn't just throw it away I'm not really sure, but who cares. Waste not, want not, I guess.

At any rate, Chucky comes back in a fresh plastic body (too bad he can't be transferred to a human as easily as he can be transferred from one doll body to another), and once again resumes his quest for Andy's soul. I've heard complaints about why Chucky had to go after Andy and couldn't just find a bum on the street or something, but you'll remember in the first movie, the conditions of his plastic entrapment stated that he could only transfer into the body of the first person that he revealed his identity to once he was inside the Chucky doll.

Jarrett Friend, writing for HorrorWatch, made the above suggestion having forgotten that little stipulation, but also smartly suggested that the plot should have involved a huge number of Chucky dolls, since the original doll was melted down and whose plastic conceivably should have infected much more dolls than just the one that we saw in this movie. This would have made the movie much more interesting and added another level of originality; my guess is they just didn't have the budget for something that big.

Nevertheless, even though the first sequel in the Child's play series comes dangerously close to falling into that sophomore sequel chasm of falling flat because of obviously feeding off the success of its predecessor without having much of anything to add to the story, Child's Play 2 escapes into the world of moderately acceptable horror sequels, kind of like Psycho II, which had no hope of matching its predecessor but at least was able to justify its own existence.

I think it's easy to be put off by the conclusion of Child's Play 2, but I was pretty impressed with the toy factory setting, if only because it created such a great atmosphere for Chucky to make his hunt and Andy and his foster sister Kyle to try vainly to escape. There was some pretty clever stuff in the final act of the film, not including, however, the scene where Kyle and Andy run around completely lost, making the factory seem like a maze by editing together a lot of clips of them clearly running around the same corner half a dozen times or so. A bit trite, but nothing compared to my biggest gripe of the film, which is the final scene, one of the goofier things that I've seen on an otherwise at least moderately competent horror movie.

Odd for a movie to try so hard to live up to its expectations and then belittle itself with something like what I'll just call the air hose scene. I do, however, think that the movie was successful and good enough to deserve a better DVD than it got. I can't stand it when the only extra features on the DVD for a successful film are nothing but some foreign audio tracks and cast and crew history that is nothing more than a brief biography and a list of film credits. What do you think the IMDb is for?
40 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Child's Play 2
ChrisOfficial18 July 2013
Incredible 1990's Sequel Into The Child's Play Series. Chucky returns as a doll again possessed by the soul of a serial killer. He goes after Andy to take over his soul. Chucky destroys everyone who stands in his way of his plan.

Another amazing performance by Alex Vincent who starred as Andy. He did great in this sequel and it was great seeing him on screen again. He brought on a incredible performance going against Chucky once again. Also Brad Dourif did great playing the Voice of Chucky. Chucky was funny and dangerous this time around again. Also great acting by Christine Elise and the entire cast.

I recommend Child's Play 2 and The Child's Play Series To Everyone. Looking forward In Seeing More Created. PHENOMENAL HORROR CLASSIC!
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sorry Jack, Chucky's back!
CuriosityKilledShawn2 April 1999
Warning: Spoilers
Universal must have realized the potential this franchise had and quickly snapped up the rights from MGM after the first movie came out. Writer Don Mancini also must have figured out that his creation of a foul-mouthed killer doll was too good for just one film. The Chucky series would seriously evolve and change over the years but even in this first sequel things are already looking quite different, even if it suffers from Deja Vu a little bit.

Now that the cat is out of the bag and we know that Chucky really is alive and it isn't just Andy's imagination, our killer doll gets much more screen time and his wicked personality has more time to develop. The animatronics have improved and a lot of Chucky's character comes through in his wild facial expressions.

Director John Lafia shoots the film with a bright, playroom color pallet with most of the location footage done in Los Angeles with only a few key shots done in Chicago (as if the Windy City was ever this sunny). Despite the autumn setting it does feel like a rather Xmas-y film. He's also fully aware of how silly the killer doll concept is and seizes the opportunity for some of the self-aware sarcastic humor seen in the later films.

Graeme Revell usually does the most generic horror scores, especially in recent years, but surprisingly he gives Child's Play 2 the best score of the series with a full orchestra at his disposal, he doesn't hold back on the action cues and even delivers a couple of pretty good themes. So much better than the rotten score to the first film and probably one of the best horror scores of the 90s, or even of all time. It really is that good, and elevates this sequel to a higher level than most snobby critics would consider it deserves.

There isn't much of a story to Child's Play 2 however. It's just the same as the first, with Chucky going after Andy, who is now staying with a foster family, once more. The body count is higher and there are some good kills, but I wish that the running time wasn't so anorexic and that it held back on the "lurking in the dark" scenes.

The slick quality and silly nature of Child's Play 2 is probably what prompted Universal to stick with the franchise for good and 23 years later the Chucky films are still coming out. To think that if MGM held on to the rights, we may never have had them.
27 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Chucky lost respect.
insomniac_rod9 August 2004
Warning: Spoilers
"Child's Play" (1988) surprised horror fans worldwide because it wasn't as cheesy as thought. In fact, it's a great horror movie with an interesting premise, good direction, great acting, and some scary moments. I wish I could say the same about the direct 1990 sequel "Child's Play 2". Obviously this sequel was very rushed and came when it shouldn't. Spending more time on a script and another choice for director could've helped this to become a decent sequel.

**SPOILERS** After the traumatic events of part 1, Andy Barclay is separated from his mother and both are under psychological treatment. Then Andy is settled with an adoptive family formed by Mr. and Mrs. Simpson and Kyle, an orphan troubled girl also adopted by the Simpsons. Police denied Andy and his mother's version of the events and close the case making the events of the original movie as non existent. Executives and the President of the "Good Guy" company needed an official explanation in order to shut down rumors spread by tabloids about a possessed Good Guy doll. Engineers of the company explore and repair the rests of the supposedly possessed doll and do not find any abnormality. Suddenly lightning strikes the doll and one of the producing engineers gets electrocuted and dies. Chucky is resurrected that way and once again starts his search for Andy in order to get his soul out of the body and pass it on Andy's.

Chucky manages to enter Andy's new house and subsequently his life. Nobody believes Andy when he says that Chucky is alive and living inside the house, but when things start to get a little ugly after Mr. Simpson's death, only Kyle realizes the boy is telling the truth. Kyle and Chucky escape from Chucky after a series of events and persecutions and end up in the Good Guy factory. The climatic ending leads Andy and Kyle blowing up Chucky's body (or what it's left of it). You have to watch it for specific details, it's a very weird death.

This time Chucky kills Andy's school teacher, Mr. and Mrs. Simpson, a Good Guy exec., a Good Guy worker, Tommy (a Good Guy doll), and a woman of the family center.

ACTING. In this field the best is Alex Vincent's performance. He's a very cute boy still and this time his performance is stronger than in the first movie. He had potential to become a child star. Kyle's performance is okay, and her beautiness helps a lot. Brad Dourif's voice is still excellent and gives Chucky a personality. The other actors are regular and makes us miss Mr. Sarandon and Catherine Hicks. DIRECTION. Boring and tries to copy Tom Holland's. This movie is not attractive for the eye and is just one of the bunch of early 90's crappy horror movies. F/X. Chucky has more screen time but sadly it's not as good as in part 1. Remember, quantity is not quality. The gore is okay and Chucky's death is somewhat good in the gore field. SCORE. Regular. Nothing you haven't seen.

Watch "Child's Play" 2 only if you are a big fan of Chucky. I'm not a huge fan but I enjoy his movies; I'm a big fan of the original Child's Play movie, not because of Chucky. As a child I like all of the Chucky movies the same, but not that I can say I enjoy good horror I realize the best of the bunch is "Child's Play". Sequels shouldn't be spawned after the original IMO. After the superior "Child's Play", the franchise turned into horror/comedy movies with a Chucky that would crack one liners a la Freddy Krueger. By the time of part 2, Chucky wasn't nearly scary or menacing as in the original.

4/10. Mindless fun.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Chucky's back.
FiendishDramaturgy5 February 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Well, the possessed doll is back, and this time, he's got a new face and it's much better animated.

This installment has a little bit better feel to it than the first. Perhaps it's because we, as an audience, are more comfortable with the concept of a killer doll with foul language, and a little boy who is a gutsy unwilling victim. Also, while the first one was campy, the second has some seriously funny moments. However, the camp is still quite prevalent.

But, as the human soul is indestructible, so is Chucky. It's the soul of Charles Lee Ray, which animates him, after all, and until they figure out how to destroy a soul, we're going to be "blessed" with Chucky movies.

7.2/10 from...

the Fiend :.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Nothing special.
marccfantozzi2 November 2021
Chucky tracks Andy down and continues to stalk him.

Sequel is OK but nothing really special. The film's biggest flaw in my opinion is that the film has no likeable characters. The only semi-likeable character is Kyle but actress Christine Elise's performance is nothing special. If anything, she under acts. She just does not seem too phased at the events going on around her. If I was being stalked by a homicidal living doll I would have more emotion. The film's budget is healthy and the special effects are good and the film has an overlong but fun climax. It's just fair.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A rather entertaining horror sequel.
OllieSuave-00720 October 2016
The not-so-innocent movie about a child's doll continues with Andy Barkley (Alex Vincent) being sent to live in a foster care home while his mom is recovering from a mental hospital. Nobody believes Andy's story about Chucky the killer doll, but that soon changes when the doll returns, possessed once again by serial killer Charles Lee Ray. It goes on another rampage, this time trying to free his evil soul from the doll and transfer into Andy's body.

The plot's pacing, script, and music score work fine in this movie, with a some good humor and suspense, and some creepy moments. The acting was pretty good for the most part - especially enjoyed the characters of Andy and Kyle. Vincent portrayed Andy with innocence but determination and Christine Elise gave a rebellious yet tender-hearted and strong portrayal of foster teenager Kyle. Brad Dourif gave another sinister, dark, and sarcastically funny portrayal of Chucky.

The overall horror elements may seem tame by more recent standards, but it's still a rather entertaining horror sequel.

Grade B
23 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Oddly artistic, "Child's Play 2" has an almost grandiose, mythical feel to it's tone and style. Though it doesn't quite hit home with the same quality as the original.
TedStixonAKAMaximumMadness13 September 2014
There's something to marvel at while watching "Child's Play 2." From a grandiose score courtesy of the wonderful Graeme Revell. To some really fascinating set-design. To quirky, stylized direction from John Lafia. And even a few key scenes that have a timeless, mythical feel. It seems that the creative team behind "Child's Play 2" sought to not only create an effective sequel, but also build the character of Chucky into the sort of thing that legends are made of. This is a big, bombastic, wild ride of a film, constrained within the guise of being a standard slasher-sequel.

But, there's something important to think about. A key question. Does it work?

And the answer to that question: Sort of, I guess.

Following a wild opening in which Chucky (voiced by the fantastic Brad Dourif) is re-constructed in a way that I actually found quite intriguing, he escapes and sets off to find his old target- young Andy Barclay (Alex Vincent), who is in the process of being placed into a new foster home. With his new body, Chucky hopes to finally be able to transfer his tormented spirit into a human host once and for all. And so a sort-of deadly game begins, as Chucky infiltrates Andy's new home, and toys with him, causing him distress and picking off the people around him, leading up to a final confrontation that I can only describe as epic in scope and quite satisfying.

Returning screenwriter Don Mancini seems more at home this time around (after some apparent drama with the first film going into rewrites), and relishes in the chaos of the storyline. You can feel a writer just having fun with the material when you watch this film. Everything is bigger. Stakes rise to new heights. Set-pieces are more encompassing and wild. And there are new ideas being explored left and right.

John Lafia's guidance as director is quite good. While the original film was slick and grounded, Lafia here goes for stylized visuals that lend a unique quality to the film, making it feel more akin to a fairy-tale. And I really enjoyed that aspect of the production. Although at times it does take you out of the movie, because things are a little TOO stylish. (A scene where a character has to run around a maze of boxes, while suspenseful, will probably make you chuckle and exclaim "Who stacks boxes like that?!")

I found the performances admirable. Alex Vincent grows quite a bit as a young performer. Though I didn't mention it in my review of the first film, I never found his acting organic or believable. He was just a little too young and a little too cute for you to believe the emotions he was trying to convey. But here, he knocks it out of the park. He's a bit older, as had more experience acting, and is able to give a really remarkable, compelling performance for a child-actor. Supporting roles by the likes of Christine Elise and Jenny Agutter are also quite good. Particularly Elise as "Kyle", Andy's older "Foster Sister", who becomes the person he connects with most in the story. She has a lot of heart in her performance, and comes off well on- screen, and along with Andy, is the one person you really care for.

And of course there is Brad Dourif. He IS Chucky. His role is a perfect blend of different elements, combining to create a near-ideal slasher-movie villain. Dourif's voice is commanding and threatening, yet also oddly endearing and amusing when it needs to be. His delivery is spot-on in every scene. And he is able to take charge of every scene he's in.

All of this being said, I do think there are a lot of fundamental issues with the film. And I do believe that despite rampant strengths, it just doesn't quite "gel together" as it did in the first movie.

Despite the more grandiose scale and qualities of the film, I thought it didn't do quite as good a job at forging human connections. With so much chaotic content, the smaller moments just seemed to become lost in translation, which is a pretty big issue. This is a film of style over substance.

I also felt that the film lost me at a few times. Some of the performers aren't up to snuff (despite the main cast being great), some of the deaths are bizarre and weak, and some moments just seemed silly, or went on for far too long.

If the film could have gone through just a little bit more trimming and re-editing, I think it could easily have matched the quality of the original.

But still, as it stands, "Child's Play 2" is highly enjoyable, albeit flawed. And I think that in the grand scheme of things, it's definitely worth checking out for all fans of horror. If the story doesn't win you over, the crazy, mythical style just might.

I give it an average 6 out of 10.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A rushed out sequel that lacks the first film's imaginative power
Leofwine_draca29 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Sequels tend to fall into one of two broad categories. The first is the 'improvement' sequel that strives to outdo its predecessor – films like TERMINATOR 2, ALIENS and THE DARK KNIGHT fall into this category, one of my favourites. The second is the 'rip-off' sequel, the sole reason for which is to make money. These films typically rehash the plot from the first movie without adding anything new to the blend and look like nothing more than bland imitators. Sadly, CHILD'S PLAY 2 is the latter type of sequel, a weak imitation of the first movie lacking the same originality, narrative thrust and enjoyment.

Things kick off at a toy factory where some manufacturers inexplicably revive Chucky, who was burned to a cinder at the end of the last flick. Soon enough he's back up and running, stalking Andy Barclay. What follows is in essence a series of cheesy deaths: people are stabbed, fall to their deaths, get electrocuted and in one instance are killed by a ruler. Unfortunately such moments feel tired and drawn out and this is a film that feels like it's in search of a plot. The only thing that holds it together is Brad Dourif, having a ball once more as the voice of Chucky. Alex Vincent also returns from the first but he seems more morose and restrained there; either he was bored with the role or told to act' subdued'.

With Alex's mother written out of the movie, we're introduced to a bland foster couple – there's nothing much to get out of the sheer boredom of these guys, which is a shame because two cult favourites play them; Gerrit Graham and Jenny Agutter, both wasted with nothing of what made them so memorable in the first place. The cheesy, extended finale is more yawn-inducing than inspiring this time around, as we've already seen all the Chucky-isn't-dead-is-he scares. Special effects are adequate but the low budget is apparent in many scenes, especially the non-starter of a car crash which is laughably bad. In all this is a worthless remake in a series filled with pretty uninteresting, undeserving films; apparently the rushed-out sequel is even worse. Stay tuned...
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I don't know why this got a 5.8 out of 10
jarenlyman8 October 2019
So I watched the first Child's Play a couple of months ago. I hadn't ever seen it growing up, even though I started really getting into slashers when I was about 16. I finally decided to watch it, and had a perfectly fun time, but not much more. I hadn't had the desire to rewatch it, or buy it. That said, I did still have a slight interest in seeing this one. Today, I finally did...and I'm really glad I did. I found this one more entertaining than the first one in every way. The movie flew by, and every scene I was intrigued to see where it was going. I found myself very invested in Andy's character, and seeing how he deals with the aftermath of the first one. I also found Kyle to be a really likeable, older sister type character. Between Chucky's one liners, the atmosphere, the pacing, and the acting, I was hooked. Not to mention the finale has an awesome setting. I'm glad I checked it out, and as a horror fan, I may just need to add it to my collection.
42 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Chucky is back with a vengeance...pretty fair sequel for horror fans...
Doylenf29 December 2006
Chucky is one of those dolls that can't stay dead, still inhabited by an evil spirit. The little boy he turned into an orphan is leaving the clinic now that he's over the traumatic situation (or so the head of the clinic tells his adoptive parents). His adoptive parents take him home and you know things aren't going to settle down when a Chucky doll drops from the top shelf of a closet he's exploring.

The evil Chucky doll finds his way to the household, switches places with the toy doll and buries it, setting the stage for things to come. Credibility really is strained by the time we get to the schoolroom scene where Chucky has followed the boy to school, lands magically in his classroom and manages to start trouble between the boy and the teacher, who subsequently gets killed by Chucky after the boy has climbed out a window. Takes quite an imagination to think of these plot lines, but when the imagination runs wild plausibility begins to suffer.

Following the schoolhouse segment, the bizarre incidents keep piling up as Chucky gets away with more and more havoc and no one believes the boy is telling the truth--just as in the original.

None of the incidents are as startling or as well staged as in CHILD'S PLAY, but it still manages to hold the interest with some original touches tinged with fright and a weird sense of humor. Especially good are the effects toward the end when Chucky holds the spunky adopted girl and boy captive as the story speeds toward an ending in the toy factory. The factory sequence has some grotesque chills as one of the workers gets caught up in the doll machinery and Chucky himself suffers quite a few "happenings" at the toy factory before he's liquidated by the boy.

Entertaining nonsense despite the strain on credibility.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"No more Mr. Good Guy-doll !"
Coventry31 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
You don't have to be Nostradamus to predict a sequel to the original and creepy film by Tom Holland was inevitable. The soul of a psycho-killer inside a doll was a big hit at the box-office and you know what that means...More from the same!! And fast! But hey, who's complaining? Child's Play 2 is fairly good. Some nice twists, several funny moments and a few very original killings. What more could you ask for in a horror sequel? Story doesn't matter. In fact, can you call this a story ? Chucky comes back to life and continues to chase Andy to take over his soul. He has to kill everyone who comes too close to him and his secret and every time he's about to call Dumballah ( or whatever ), he gets interrupted. Voilà, there you have the plot of Child's Play 2. Original ? No. Entertaining ? Yes, very. Jenny Agutter plays the role of Andy's foster mom. I tell you, she still is as adorable as when she played her role in American Werewolf in London...only older, of course. Brad Dourif returns as the voice of Chucky and he seems to enjoy that very much. That's about all there is to say about Child's Play 2. Certainly not a "urgently need-to-see movie" but pure fun if you come across it on TV or something. It's recommended to watch the first two films in a row. Child's Play 3, however, should be avoided like the plague...yuk. The more recent Bride of Chucky uses a whole other style, but surely is worth a look. I'm quite sure more sequels have yet to come...
6 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Creepy follow-up
jhaggardjr20 July 2001
"Child's Play 2" is the first sequel to the popular 1988 original. The first film was a very entertaining horror film. The second movie in the series isn't as good, but it's not real bad either. However, the filmmakers took the gory route for this one. All the graphic violence makes it less effective. The first movie worked so well because it kept the violence down to a minimal. Oh the first film was violent, but not as violent as this one. But it's stylish look somehow makes it watchable. And, like the original, it's entertaining to watch. Young Alex Vincent reprises his role from the original as Andy Barclay, the boy who in this movie goes to live with foster parents while his mother seeks psychiatric help (from the events in "Child's Play"). Andy himself still isn't all together, and when Chucky the killer doll re-enters his life again, watch out! "Child's Play 2" may not be as good as "Child's Play", but it sure is better than the next movie in the series, "Child's Play 3" (which I thought was awful). I haven't seen the fourth movie yet ("Bride of Chucky"), so I can't voice my opinion on that one at the moment.

**1/2 (out of four)
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chucky Has His Energizers!
BaronBl00d16 December 2001
Chucky, the sweet-faced lovable little doll filled with the soul of a voodoo loving serial killer, is back in his second feature, aptly if not originally named Child's Play 2. The only other member of the cast of the original film to return is the young Alex Vincent as the boy Chucky must kill so as to not permanently be imprisoned in the body of the doll. Brad Douriff is back as the maniacal voice of the pint-sized murderer. What you would expect from a sequel of this caliber is pretty much what you get. Little plot, little characterization, lots of killing, lots of blood, lots of gore effects, and a Chucky that comes back, comes back, comes back, comes back, and comes back. I got so tired of watching Chucky come out of situations where he was supposed to be 'dead" that it was like a test of endurance for my common sense. Vincent does a good job with his role, but the film really lacks from the freshness and individuality of the original film's characters. I don't know why people that make horror sequels always think it is just the gore and blood which makes the first film popular. They are integral parts, but the film probably(not always) has other elements that appeal to people over 15. This sequel eliminates those elements and makes it very clear that its intended audience is between 15-19. Pity, because I found the first film very effective and slightly intelligent on one level. This film is really nothing more than one killing after another until we get to the factory where other Chuckies are made and the real nonsense begins in what has to be one of the most ridiculous finales of a horror film I have seen in some time. Now it sounds like I am really bashing this film...and I am...but one small concession on my part is that the film moves by quickly and is entertaining on a bad its good level.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Child's Play 2
jboothmillard7 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The first film in the series caused a big buzz, in both good and bad ways, so a sequel starring the infamous antagonist seemed almost inevitable, this followed two years after the original. Basically it has been two years since the events of the first film, the remains of Chucky the doll, possessed by the soul of "The Lakeshore Strangler", Charles Lee Ray (Brad Dourif) (named after Charles Manson, Lee Harvey Oswald and James Earl Ray), has been recovered and reconstructed by Play Pals Inc. They have had bad publicity because of the events reported, they have put the doll back together for analysis, and to prove to the public there was nothing wrong with it. Of course they are unaware that the soul of Ray still inhabits the doll, so he comes back to life soon enough. Chucky is after the child he tried to transfer his soul into before, Andy Barclay (Alex Vincent), now eight years old and in foster care, as his mother is in a psychiatric hospital, declared insane for her claims. Andy is living with foster parents Joanne Simpson (An American Werewolf in London's Jenny Agutter) and Phil Simpson (Gerrit Graham). Also living with them is teenage orphan Kyle (Christine Elise), who has been transferred to numerous foster homes due to her trouble making. Chucky manages to track Andy down, he finds another Good Guy Doll is in the house, he switches himself with it. Andy is paranoid about the Good Guy Doll, and fearful that Chucky will return. Sure enough, Chucky ties him up and attemps to transer his soul, until the parents interrupt, assuming Kyle is responsible. The next day, Andy goes to his new school, Chucky follows him and gets him into trouble with teacher Miss Kettlewell (Donnie Darko's Beth Grant), writing an expletive on his test paper. Andy is put in detention, but manages to escape the classroom before Chucky can get to him, Mrs. Kettlewell is killed by Chucky. The killer doll returns to the house, Phil is the next victim, but still no-one believes the little boy's story that the doll is responsible. Kyle discovers the truth, she uncovers the original Good Guy Doll buried in the back yard, but Chucky holds her at gunpoint, demanding she takes him to the Foster Centre. Andy tries to escape, but Chucky takes him by force to the nearby Play Pals Inc. factory, to attempt to transfer his soul into Andy's body. But the incantation ritual fails, Chucky has a nose bleed and realises he is trapped inside the doll body. Enraged, he tries to kill Andy and Kyle, chasing them through the factory, losing his hand in the process, replacing it with a knife blade. After losing his legs as well, Chucky is splashed by heated plastic mould until apparently dead, he springs to life one more time, before getting an air hose shoved into his mouth, he is inflated until he explodes, and Andy and Kyle walk out relieved it is over. Also starring Grace Zabriskie as Grace Poole, Peter Haskell as Sullivan and Greg Germann as Mattson. As before Vincent is cute as the little boy trying to convince everyone of the evil doll chasing him, and the puppet techniques and menacing and wisecracking vocals of Dourif make Chucky the star of the film. It is fair to say that this follow up is almost the same thing all over again, but the deaths are inventive and fun, the finale in the toy factory is a nice touch, and Chucky is always good value, a predictable but not completely terrible horror. Okay!
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fair sequel, that has a great climax
MovieFan98318 January 1999
This movie wasn't bad. It was somewhat scary, and stylish. The ending was good though. 6 out of 10. Rated R for strong horror violence and language.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Who's Jack? And why is he sorry?
thesar-217 October 2009
Whereas #1 was fun, adventurous, original (to a point) and scary, 'Child's Play 2' plays out like a 'Friday the 13th' sequel. One of the bad chapters. It's almost half-believable how Jason kept coming back, if you suspend your disbelief to the max, but how Chucky is resurrected from the definite end in #1 is downright hilariously bad. But if you can overlook that, you get horrible camera wide-angles that are annoying, clichéd characters, predictable kills and props and literal overkill. And Andy? The actor, Vincent, though probably pleased to return, seems like he slept-walked through this movie, especially the closing. Here's the so-called synopsis: Chucky's Back as some of the titles indicate. He's back to transfer his soul into little Andy so he doesn't have to stay a doll, a position he put himself in, in #1. But will anyone believe Andy, now in foster care since his mother in #1, Hicks, refused to return? Probably not. This movie is seriously a no-brainer, or the writers were. Either way, it should be skipped. Thankfully, it's a short release, but the little substance it has hardly make up the 84 minute running time. Honestly, I can't say much nice, but maybe the girl, Kyle (who seemed like a character pulled from 'Friday the 13th part V') was a tiny bit interesting, but unfortunately, the foster dad (who seemed like a character pulled from 'Friday the 13th part VII') was anything but. Yes, Chucky is fun to watch, but not young kids smoking, which seemed real. Skip. In fact, watch part 1, jump to 'Bride of Chucky' and quit the series. Of all 5, so far, those are the only valuable ones.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Incredible sequel
dullfinboy3 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Child's play 2 is my favorite of the series. It is amazing in every way. The theme is superb. Brad Dourif returns to voice the evil doll Chucky. Alex Vincent also returns play Andy Barclay. Christine Elise plays Kyle In this movie. This movie is also one of my favorite movies of all time. The movie is gorier than the first. The climax of the movie is better and is fun, exciting, scary, gory, suspenseful and disturbing. Chucky is even more evil in this movie. His lines are more clever and catchier as well. The animatronic have improved and are superb. The kills are cool. The scene where Chucky hides in the closet and jumps out and stabs Ms. Kettlewell with the ball pump and pushes her out of the closet into a row of desks. He then walks out of the closet with a yardstick and says "You've been very naughty Ms. Kettlewell." and slams the yardstick on his hand. He then walks over to here with a very frightening smile. The he beats her to death. That is a very disturbing and scary scene. There is another scene where Chucky and Kyle are driving to get Andy and the talk and are stopped by a police officer. The officer notices Chucky and asks his name and Chucky replies in his normal voice "Chucky.". The movie perfectly filmed. The movie is fun to watch. It gets a 10/10. Child's play 2 is great.
21 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Far-fetched but fun
cowboykalira23 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Okay, some people say this movie is a very cheesy sequel to Child's Play, and I can't disagree with them. But in some cases, cheesy is exactly what you want from a movie. Especially if it features a red-haired freckled doll possessed by a serial killer. Come on people, of course this movie was going to be cheesy. The first one just about managed to keep it together with some suspense, but once you've done the big reveal there's not a lot of credible scares you can wring out of this premise.

What's left is having fun with it, and Child's Play 2 does that very well. From the opening scene in which Chucky is reconstructed by the original toy factory (for a nonsensical reason, but who cares?), it has this obvious sequel quality to it. The thing that could not be destroyed, but was, is back, and he's angrier than ever! The cliché of the cynical company bosses is played out and then we're on our way.

That first scene sets the mood really well, you really get everything you need to get an idea what this movie is going to be like. Over the top, campy, set in its own reality. There really was no other way to go after the over the top ending of Child's Play 1, with the melted, barely recognizable Chucky dragging himself to his victims for a final scare. So we get some enjoyable one-liners from old Chuckles, and I definitely got some chuckles out of his killer lines. Literally, because most of his one-liners are accompanied buy an equally funny kill.

About those kills, well, they're maybe not even extremely creative, but they're sure as hell effective. In the beginning of the movie all of the people Chucky kills really deserve to die (in horror-movie terms that is, obviously no one really deserves to die). I'm rooting for Chucky when he kills the underling of the company director who brought old Charles back in the first place and who's just a slimy little weasel. Then Chucky manages to kill Andy's horrible teacher with a ruler, in the classroom where she locked Andy. And even when foster dad Phil is killed on the way to punish little Andy for misbehaving, you're still sort of rooting for the doll.

But no horror movie can thrive on just murdering bad guys, so from that point on the movie takes a more action-driven mood, which is done quite nicely. In the end, we go back to real sequel territory when we return to the good guy doll factory for an ultimate showdown, set to a background of thousands of good guy dolls in various stages of being manufactured. That just works brilliantly.

The acting in this movie never strays into academy award winner territory, but it's sufficient, and especially little Andy and his stepsister Kyle play their parts pretty well. Of course the real star is Brad Dourif who serves his cheesy lines with a side order of ham.

The effects are again nothing mind-blowing (well... one effect is, but that's not a description of its quality, it just literally blows Chucky's mind apart), but they're not bad. Add to that a pretty good score, decent camera work and editing, and you have a nice little brain-snack. I don't think it was anyone's intention to make this a great piece of art. It's pulp, entertainment. Ultimately pointless, but a great watch when you're bored.

I can't rate this higher than a 6 objectively, but in my heart I would have given it a 7 or 8, just because it's so unpretentious. Horror sequels that try to artificially invoke the same terror the original had to offer are usually horrible to watch. Child's Play 2, although it is of course nowhere near as good as the first movie, made the right choice to take a different approach.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not as Fun or Startling
Zac_La_Porte21 October 2021
Child's Play 2 brings back Chucky, this time delivering complete absence of the original's charge and still falling short of new aims. Therefore, it's a real bummer that the possessed killer doll can't be finished with his slashings. It firstly means a poorer cast, who the writer decides each stick to the annoying "the-kid-was-right-all-along" sorts of characters.

Thankfully, Brad Dourif and Alex Vincent haven't changed their characters, with the evil killer doll targeting the innocent child. By that, we obviously get the same kind of structure as the original. The massive fans might hopefully get a kick out of this sequel. Nothing has changed...

If anything, it's a lot dumber, sillier and fails to deliver the messages in a clever way. However, this Child's Play instalment isn't overly bad. Somewhat alike the original, it's often entertaining, but it loses its enthusiasm as it drags along. The storyline seems to also run pretty decently.

If you liked this review, check out the full review and other reviews at aussieboyreviews.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Chucky is back in this excellent sequel!
Horror_Metal11 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Two years ago, young Andy Barclay (Alex Vincent) was terrorized by a killer "Good Guy" doll named Chucky. Chucky was possessed by the spirit of serial killer Charles Lee Ray (Brad Dourif) and the only way he could become human again was to transfer his soul into Andy's body. After murdering several people, the evil doll was burnt to a crisp and dismembered by Andy's mother which effectively put an end to his crimes. No one believed Andy's mom and she was taken away to a mental correction facility for her crazy story. The now eight year old Andy has since been placed into a new home with foster parents Phil Simpson (Gerrit Graham), Joanne Simpson (Jenny Agutter), and their adoptive daughter Kyle (Christine Elise). Meanwhile, Chucky has been reconstructed by the company that manufactures the Good Guy dolls in order to prove a point. Knowing that Andy is his only means of becoming human again, the murderous doll immediately goes after the poor boy and will kill anyone who gets in his way!

I will never understand the bad things that I sometimes hear about this sequel, it's great! Sure the first film is way scarier and more suspenseful but here we see way more of Chucky and his one liners, which are both cruel and hilarious. Most of the adults in this film are very unlikable and I've heard people complain about that, but it makes it all the more satisfying when they meet their fate at the hands of Chucky! The killer doll is once again voiced by Brad Dourif, who is a huge favorite of mine and never fails to deliver those lines with such wicked devotion. No one can ever replace Brad and you can tell he loves being the voice of Chucky. Alex Vincent is also on top of his game here as Andy from the first film and delivers a structured and layered performance. He has great chemistry with Christine Elise who plays Kyle, his foster sister. This sequel has some of the best kills of the whole series and I also love the action-packed finale in the toy factory. This movie isn't quite as good as the original but I will still give it a perfect rating as seeing more of Chucky is always a good thing. I'll never get over his side splitting comment about women drivers towards the end of the movie, funny stuff! Long live Chucky!
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This sequel has good moments but no longer has the freshness and does not maintain the same tension as the first one
fernandoschiavi9 July 2021
Unlike franchises like Halloween, there has always been a mentor behind the Child's Play movies: screenwriter Don Mancini, who created and scripted every movie in the series. Even though he hasn't written anything that didn't involve the demonic doll Chucky (with the exception of one episode of Tales from the Crypt), Mancini is a smart screenwriter, who came up with a lot of well-drawn-out situations in every production.

Released just two years after the original, this is a sequel that really takes the film's mythology further, explaining the events after the end of the previous film. It starts with a well-crafted scene at the Play Pal toy factory, where a Good Guy doll is being renovated after being set on fire. Guess which doll this is! So it is. After Chucky was destroyed in the previous film, the factory owners think it's a good idea to renovate the doll to combat the bad publicity generated by the murders committed by the toy. Of course, no one believes Chucky will get up and keep killing again. And of course that's exactly what he does. In an inexplicable but even interesting scene, Chucky electrocutes (who knows how and who knows why) one of the employees who were rebuilding him. Meanwhile, the boy Andy (played again by Alex Vincent), a survivor from the previous film, is sent to a foster family after his mother was sent to a clinic for psychological treatment.

The problem with the sequel to Toy Assassin is born from the basis on which the film bases its argument. The first film makes it quite clear that, having spent a lot of time in the doll's body, Charles Lee Ray would have no choice but to accept the Good Guy's body as his own, since then the doll would be completely human inside. The second film chooses to ignore this fact, as well as ignore that the doll had already died, rather than continuing a completed story. Once the damage is done, the time has come to move forward and look at the result of all this.

Although Alex Vincent remains the interpreter of Andy Barclay, the new cast of actors is not as expressive as that of the original film. With the exception of some good action scenes, Child's Play2 doesn't show anything new compared to the first feature. The sequel just confirms the pattern that would follow in films starring Chucky: it doesn't matter how many times you kill the doll. He comes back. It will always come back. And he will go out and kill everyone he comes across. Director John Lafia, one of the screenwriters of the original, manages to maintain important features of the original, such as the first-person camera in some scenes. The good soundtrack again helps build the suspense, this time performed by Graeme Revell. The big problem is that some good murder scenes are diluted over the course of the projection, which has many more scenes that take place during the day. Chucky's appearances are much more predictable and the suspense doesn't work so well anymore, especially since we no longer have that expectation generated by seeing the doll for the first time.

Child's Play2 misses the opportunity to use this to create a different clash between Andy and Chucky. With this, the logic is practically the same as in the first movie, where the boy simply tries to convince the others that the doll is alive while trying to survive him. At the end of the first one, he was already facing Chucky. It's bizarre to believe that Andy was really convinced that Chucky was just a brainchild, which also resets the entire evolution of the character, who, like Chuck, returns to his original state. And so the story goes on, piling up scenes that are sometimes absurd, sometimes tense, sometimes comical, in the right measure. The screenwriter Don Mancini and the director fail to bring little news to the film. In addition to the obvious changes in the boy's life, what we see once again is the boy's pursuit and many innocent deaths that cross Chucky's path, but in different settings. Chucky this time kills in a school, in a house, in a car in a parking lot, etc. There are also some scenes that are quite funny, like the one where he finds the other Good Guy doll, attacking him and burying him in the family's backyard, as well as other phrases that further emphasize the sarcasm so typical of Chucky.

One of the interesting relationships is the pair Andy and Kyle. In the final stretch, the girl's fight to save the boy from the villain's clutches, with car chase rights, a race in a maze made by boxes of Good Guys dolls in a factory that produced them and the constant tension of not knowing where the doll is. The idea of the third act being in the factory was brilliant, well at least it was creative. Set the climax right at the Good Guy doll factory, where Chucky is fought off by Kyle and Andy. The setting is well used, and it's just a shame that there isn't a scene where Chucky gets mixed up with hundreds of dolls, confusing the heroes. But despite that, we have a long chase scene, plus one of the most bizarre deaths in the series.

Chucky is more prominent in this movie. Early on he starts going after Andy, his appearances full of sarcasm and with excellent effects guarantee the fun. Another curiosity of this film in relation to the first one is that Chucky, as a doll, has changed. Less detailed people won't notice. Chucky's physiognomy as both Good Guy and the doll moving and making their bizarre expressions is more serious and realistic.

The only thing that hasn't changed is the doll's internal transformation, organs and blood become part of his system over time, we can see this in parts like Chucky starts bleeding through his nose or when he cuts off his hand. Remember that the situations in the first movie take two days. In "The Child's Play2", the plot takes place over a period of three days, so there is a consistency of Chucky not being able to pass his soul on to Andy as he took longer than the first movie to try to do it.

This sequel no longer has the freshness of novelty and does not maintain the same tension as the first one, but it undoubtedly also marked and was present in the nightmares of many in the 1990s. Child's Play2 is a really fun movie, which fortunately doesn't try to create a new masterpiece of horror, and cares only about having fun. The story doesn't stop, and there is always action going on. The doll's charisma carries the film, a credit to the doll team (at a time when CGI was not available) and, especially, to Brad Dourif, who was the sarcastic voice of the villain in all the films in the series.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Child's Play 2 is more disturbing and laughable than scary, and that's no good.
stewiefan20120 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
(Almost) Every horror movie has its degrading sequels, and Child's Play is no different. Well what can I say, if you've seen the original movie you probably realize what this sequel is about. Chucky the killer doll, with the inhabited soul of a madman, is back again! And he's angrier, and more sadistic, and wielding more corny one-liners than ever. All Chucky fans remember that he was burnt to a toasty crisp in the first movie. However in order to dispel rumors that Chucky ever came to life, the business that makes the Good-Guy Dolls decides to preposterously rebuild him, and show the public nothing is wrong with the doll. When they do this, Chucky comes back to life and sets out to find Andy Barclay (Alex Vincent). The kid he needs to voodoo in order to come back to life as a human. Chucky finds Andy in the hands of his new foster parents Phil (Gerrit Graham) and Joann (Jenny Agutter), and a stepsister Kyle (Christine Elise). Andy realizes that Chucky is after him, but as always nobody believes the youngster. Until the crazy, psychotic doll begins running out of time to turn human again, and sadistically murders anyone in his way of Andy.

First things first, the original Child's Play is a campy classic, Child's Play 2 is not. Whereas the original had a way of composing itself with fine suspense and acting, which helped shut out the corniness of its doll-come-to-life plot. This utterly puke-inducing sequel has no way to take itself seriously at all. It happens in a lot of horror films with a lead slasher. Freddy Kruegger fell victim to crappy one-liners, Jason Voorhees turned out to be a frady-cat loser as a kid (Freddy Vs. Jason), and even Michael Myers got his butt kicked by Busta Rhymes. The only slightly creepy thing about Child's Play 2 is the ending, which takes place in the Good-Guys Doll Factory. But that can't save this ludicrously over-the-top slasher sequel. The acting is mild, the script only gets creative with the kills, and even the kills are more unsettling than scary.

The few parts where Chucky kills somebody go too far over the top, to the point where you almost (or may) laugh at them. While they were a bit creative, I was repulsed by them in every imaginable way. There is a random, grotesque kill where Chucky pushes an innocent man onto a conveyor belt, and he is killed when doll eyes are punched into his face. It's scenes like this that, while creepy, really cross the line. Horror fans may enjoy a movie with nasty kills. But for me there has to be something to back it up, or it's just a senseless kill. I think it's absolutely disgusting how Hollywood glorifies murder on screen nowadays. It's only gotten progressively worse over the years after Child's Play 2. This review is being written in 2008, and the theaters are filled with Saw, Hostel, and more torture, torture, torture! I don't understand why people are so intrigued by gore. What fascinates audiences so much with it that it makes big money in ticket sales? A person gets killed on screen and there's no tragedy, but yet everyone gets upset and mourns when someone dies in real life. There's a word for that and it's called "Hypocrite".

Child's Play 2 is an awful horror film. The poster art is scarier than the movie itself. Chucky did not deserve to have a horror series because in my opinion he's one of the worst horror icons since the evil killer Leprechaun. However I do have to give it points for its eery, creepy "playtime" atmosphere (such as the doll factory scene). I give Child's Play 2 a 1 out of 4. It's a gruesome 84 minutes, and for me it was too inhumane and it just wasn't worth it. Child's Play 2 was followed by 3 more sequels...Oh brother!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed