Little Nemo: Adventures in Slumberland (1989) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
53 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
It's nice to relive your childhood every now and then
abum1909 January 2005
My sister and I used to go to this daycare where we watched a movie a day. We watched a lot of movies more than once and this was one of them, because everyone loved it so much. About a month ago, I remembered so little about the movie that I thought I had dreamed about it (kinda ironic, don't you think?). Then I looked it up on IMDb and realized it was a real movie. I got it for my sister for Christmas and having just watched it, I'm glad I did.

Nemo is a fun-loving boy who dreams that he goes to Slumberland, a magical kingdom that contains everything any kid would ever love. This place becomes a sort of reality for Nemo and he is entrusted as King Morpheus's heir and given a key to every door in the kingdom- however, he is asked to not open the door that has the key's symbol on it. Of course, he ends up opening it (with a little encouragement from a troublemaker named Flip) and the Nightmare King ends up kidnapping the king.

The movie is not an intricate masterpiece storywise, but the plot and characters are so much fun it really doesn't matter! The real joy here is the animated backgrounds and effects- this movie is a visual stunner.
23 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Visually fantastic!
La Gremlin6 October 2000
Ever rent a movie out of curiosity because, although you've never heard a good thing about it, you want to see it anyway because you thought it looked good? That happened to me with "Little Nemo"; I rented it one summer and felt as if I had struck gold.

The thing that got me with this movie was that the animators managed to imitate the original Windsor McCay illustrations so closely. Being an illustrator myself, that completely won me over and that alone would be cause to recommend it. But this is also one of the most visually inventive animated films I've ever seen. I will not spoil the surprise by describing anything, but the way this movie depicts Slumberland is surely the best thing about it. This is definately worth hunting down.
29 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Kiddy" and "Kid Appropriate" are two very different things.
ca_dale5 June 2006
In reference to my review's my tag line, this is by no means a movie for "kids only". Looking back at Little Nemo as an adult, I'm surprised at how well it still holds up in my eyes. The writer's did a good job in making Little Nemo suitable for younger viewers, but without dumbing down the plot, dialogue, or artistic creativity of the film. There's no reason why a kids film can't be smart and original, and it really irks me when writers use a young target audience as an excuse to give us a second rate script.

Little Nemo is certainly unique if nothing else. The story follows a young, imaginative boy named Nemo as he travels through the mystical Slumberland. Nemo meets and befriends numerous people throughout Slumberland eventually earning the high esteem of the land's royal family. Unfortunately things go horribly wrong after Nemo's curiosity inadvertently leads him to unleash a virtual Pandora's Box, which threatens to destroy the kingdom. Can Nemo redeem himself and save his new friends?

The lead characters are very well developed, thanks in no small part to the great voice actors. They convey a genuine and convincing level of human emotion. Little Nemo has a very surreal atmosphere to it, which work perfectly at conveying the dreamy atmosphere of Slumberland. There are also some surprisingly dark and moody moments. Don't get me wrong, this isn't scary by any means, far from it, but the colors are very effective in conveying the tense emotion and gloomy atmosphere of these scenes. Likewise the more upbeat moments are also very well executed, with a bright vibrant array of reds, blues, yellows, etc. Really top-notch animation, that still holds up very well even by today's standards.

I would definitely recommend Little Nemo if you're looking for a quality children's film, that parents will likely enjoy as well.
19 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
They should re-release this on DVD or VCD
Angel_Meiru9 July 2004
"Little Nemo: Adventures in Slumberland" (aka. Little Nemo: Dreamland no Daiboken) is quite a fun Euro-Anime film. It also spun off a video game based on the movie and it is a good film for those whom don't really remember or never heard of McKay's original comic series.

It is about a young boy named Nemo and his flying squirrel going on different dreamlike adventures, some of them having different results of their own. Sorry, I just don't feel like spoiling anyone today.

I swear, I cannot believe this film bombed outside of Europe and Asia, because it was "un-Disney like". Yeah, well, that is why Little Nemo is good. Alot of Disney's (recent) works are so sappy and sweetsy, like syrup on sugar on saccarine. Kind of like an unberable sweetness.

Anyways, check this movie out. You will be doing me and others whom remember this film a favor, and PLEASE put it on either DVD or VCD, with also the original Japanese and French tracks too!

PS. Did you know that Brian Froud, Moebius and Hayao Miyazaki all worked on Little Nemo? No wonder it is so great!
21 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"Little Nemo" a joy true to the spirit of the original
greg-glen5 March 2009
"Little Nemo: Adventures in Slumberland" is a joy and a wonder, just like the original Winsor McCay cartoons. For those ignorant of the history of American cartoons, McCay's "Little Nemo" series was a classic of naive pop surrealism exploring the adventures of a boy in the dream-world. McCay was sometimes deficient in spelling, but he was never deficient in drawing or imagination. Of course, the movie has to elide or telescope things a bit. After all, the original cartoon was a serial running episodically in newspapers. I find no serious fault with this. I took particular delight in how some scenes here meticulously mirrored the original cartoon. The animation is at various points dreamy, beautiful, dark, menacing and, of course, surreal. I think it is a mistake to view this film purely as a product of the anime industry - the film is instead a meeting of the Japanese culture with American culture. The merger of sensibilities here is quite wonderful. I loved the squirrel's petulant irritation at being called a "rat." And I loved the nightmare monster-heel. And, of course,the trickster figure, Pip. The whole thing has the quality of a twisting dream, sometimes good, sometimes bad, just like real dreams. Don't hesitate to buy and watch this. Greg Cameron, Surrey, B.C., Canada
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A very imaginative, very fun movie
FilmFreak945 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Little Nemo is a very different kind of kid's movie. It take's place entirely in the dream's of a little boy named Nemo. Nemo is a very imaginative little boy who is known by his parents to have very complex dreams which is caused whenever he eats pie late at night. The movie's plot takes place in Nemo's most recent dream, where he is taken to Slumberland to become the royal heir to the throne and be a playmate to the King of Slumberland's daughter, Princess Camille. Nemo is entranced by all the wonders of Slumberland but he soon meets a trouble-making Flip who convinces him to open a door that the King(Morpheus) told him to never open. This causes great chaos in Slumberland and results in King Morpheus' abduction from the Nightmare King. Now Nemo has to set out and save the King from Nightmare Land and bring order back to the once peaceful Slumberland.

This movie is an extremely fun watch. The animation is very nice and there's always something going on to never make you bored watching it. The songs that went into the movie are pretty mediocre, but not entirely terrible. It's a good movie to watch with your kids if you have them, but it's also a good enough movie to watch by yourself.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An Inspired Story
sidereal-32 September 2000
Little Nemo, a boy of about 5 or 6, enjoys the bucolic wonders, beauty and fun of Slumberland, but breaks a promise to the fatherly King Morpheus which unleashes the dark powers of the Nightmare King upon his friends. He must face his terror to rescue them.

A terrific children's fantasy without a whiff of adult subtext, demeaning remarks or misplaced self-consciousness. The drawings were beautiful and wondrous; the characters were interesting and unburdened by comic-book-style psychological problems; the storyline was generous and kind, without being obsequious or sentimental. There are some frightening scenes for preschool children, involving nightmares and the demonic Nightmare King, but the reconciliation at the end of the story makes it all worthwhile. Very tender children (age 2 - 4) may find these scenes too horrifying unless a parent is there to comfort.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A heavily flawed but visually striking film.
IonicBreezeMachine24 December 2020
Nemo (Gabriel Damon) is a young boy who's prone to vivid dreaming and sneaking pies. After a circus comes to town he's told by his father that he might be too busy to go to the circus. When Nemo's next dream comes he's visited by Professor Genius (René Auberjonois) so he may be the playmate of the princess of Slumberland. Once there Nemo explores not only the wonders of Slumberland, but must also contend with the nightmares of Nightmareland after he breaks a promise not to open a forbidden door.

Produced over a period of roughly a decade and adapted from the comic strip by Winsor McCay, the movie became infamous for its revolving door of writers, directors, and producers that resulted in the creation of THREE different pilot films (One of which has never been released) before its final version was released. The movie was met with mixed reviews and lackluster box office, but did eventually manage to turn a profit thanks to healthy VHS sales. The movie is very beautiful to look at, but it's most likely far short of where the creative team wished to take it.

The movie's real star is the visuals and animation. The line work is very clean and the opening sequence where Nemo flies his bed is simply breath taking. But the movie runs into the problem of sticking too close to its source because the fact that everything happens in a dream makes much of the following film feel kind of hollow. There are some attempts to try and tie what happens in the dream to Nemo's real life with a forced parallel between his promise not to sneak pies and a promise not to open a forbidden door, but this connection is so tenuous that on its initial release it was edited out of the American version and no one really noticed. After the opening dream sequence the movie doesn't have much of a plot as Nemo basically stumbles around Slumberland playing around with the various sets and characters who are all patterned after the circus in one way or another, and because there's that theme around Slumberland it doesn't lend itself to much surprise so Slumberland feels much more mundane than it should.

In many ways an actual plot doesn't take place until about 40 minutes in where Nemo has to go to Nightmareland to rescue King Morpheus from a nightmare he accidentally released, but even this plot is rather lacking and disjointed because whenever Nemo is backed into a corner he'll "wake up" back in his bed but still be in the dream. This is done twice and further undermines the story of the movie because if it's a dream why should we care?

Despite the rather thin narrative the movie does have some merits. Even if there's a flabby mid section with not much substance, the opening and ending of the movie are really well done and filled with effectively built up atmosphere that is conveyed with striking animation and visuals. Even years after I'd seen this film the flying bed sequence and the desolation of Nightmareland with its deafening silence that served as the penultimate crescendo still play clearly in my mind. Little Nemo is a heavilly flawed movie, but it's also one that strives for greatness and has clear effort put in. It doesn't quite stack up to the sum of its parts, but it doesn't fall flat on its face either.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I was so happy!
linneamarie1117 April 2016
I remembered this movie that I used to watch when I was little. There was a parade, a squirrel, a little boy, a big man and a big key. There was a lot of black goo at one point and an evil guy. I had no idea what the movie was called and I had no idea if it was actually real, because when I told people about it (which I did a lot because I wanted to find out what it was called so I could see it again) no one had heard about it.

I started thinking that I had dreamt the whole thing. That it was one of those dreams that you have several times. I had tried googling it, I had asked my parents and my sibling, who should've known what I was talking about seeing as I probably couldn't just pick it out and put it on myself as a little kid.

Years passed, yes, years. I just thought that it was a dream. I didn't really believe that it was, but maybe...? A year or so ago, I remembered it again; the squirrel, the little boy, the key, everything. I decided to google it again, but this time I used different search words and I found it. I was so happy. You have no idea! I had been thinking about this movie for years!

I watched it again and it's a cute and sometimes scary movie. I was just happy I had a chance to find it again (:
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
***.5,3,5 out of 5 stars,a truly charming story with an unfortunate mix of "kiddie film korniness"
PJS-526 May 1999
A truly charming animated film based on the classic comic book strip & almost-a-classic NES video game(**** out of 5),the film has a definite amount of charm that'll keep the kids interested & hopefully rest of the age groups too,sadly my only problem with this film is that it those have a good amount of "children's film charm" but it also has a sufficent amount of "kiddie film lameness" true if they made into a PG film they'd probably palce a few to a good amount of worthless swearing,placing in some violence or thematic intensity would probably just be too frightening for the little ones,& if they made more like the game the filmmakers(probably unlike some of us) would not want to do that to prevent a large amount of bad ratings,(sorry that I couldn't think of a way to loosen the korny-ness of this film,perhaps some of you people out there can while you do your reviews)Overall a highly charming & allinout good kid's film.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lost Potential in the Dreamscape
elicopperman22 August 2021
Little Nemo was one of the earliest comic strips made for the medium of animation, especially given that its creator Winsor McCay had developed it into a short animated project in 1911, in addition to the groundbreaking Gertie the Dinosaur. So obviously, a proper film adaptation would seem ideal. Going as far back as the late 1970s, Japanese producer Yutaka Fujiyoka acquired the Little Nemo rights from McCay's descendants to produce a feature length movie at TMS in Japan and a small San Francisco studio. What seemed like a recipe for success turned out to be a one way ticket to disaster.

Although the final film was released in 1989, the production started as far back as 1982, solely due to numerous directors and writers being brought on only to jump ship quickly. Numerous attempts were made throughout the years, including a particularly interesting point where directors Yoshifumi Kondo and Andy Gaskill showed promise of the boy who could always dream having to grow up. Unfortunately, almost none of the creatives on board seemed to be able to put together a satisfying narrative, not even Studio Ghibli director Isao Takahata who's ideal version would have involved the maturity of Nemo as he grows up in spite of his dreams. It was even reported that once the film finally commenced production in the summer of 1988, hundreds and hundreds of scripts, concept art and even songs from many different artists and filmmakers were cobbled together just to get the film over with. When you can't come to a conclusion on what your project should be and it ends up with too many ingredients, you don't really get a very satisfying end product as a result.

In terms of what we did end up getting, the final film focuses on young Nemo entering Slumberland within his dreams and befriending the kingdom. But one night, upon discovering Nightmare Land and its evil nightmare king, Slumberland is thrown into danger and Nemo must restore all good to his dreams once and for all. What could be a seemingly straightforward plot is tragically ruined by several plot points that go nowhere and filler that makes the experience feel more tiresome than fun-filled. Probably as a result from the dreaded production, Nemo goes through so many different characters and props all throughout Slumberland and even in his own reality, yet they either serve no purpose to the plot or just start up and get brought back up way too late. Even for a movie where so much pressure is put on Nemo to save Slumberland, too much time gets wasted that you almost feel like you yourself are sleeping while watching the feature. The story could have been memorably epic, but what we end up getting is wasted potential in favor of all spectacle without any value whatsoever.

Now to give credit where it is rightfully due, the animation crew of TMS did not hold back in letting loose their true creativity. Given that this film was their next big project after the cult favorite Akira, the lush artistry and strong draftsmanship just oozes all over the screen, especially in terms of lighting and shadows. In contrast from the extravagant beauty all around Slumberland's kingdom, the more gloomy looking outskirts of Nightmareland and the swampy forests around it are quite fascinating in their own regard. Even the character animation is some of the smoothest and most colorful work done by the animation department of TMS, to the point where the lip synch matches the English VAs just as much as the Japanese VAs. Speaking of the cast, among a big number of professional voice actors, the likes of Mickey Rooney and Rene Auberjonois are delightfully amusing as their otherwise bland roles. One can tell they were having a lot more fun in the recording studio than the mediocre songs from the Sherman Brothers, which are easily forgotten as soon as they conclude they're so weak.

In the end, no matter how lucious the visuals are and no matter how much love was initially put into this Little Nemo project, all that is left is a well crafted mess with no clue of what it wants to even do with its own titular character. As it seems that producer Fujiyoka couldn't even make up his mind on where to take this otherwise ambitious project, so much for the little boy who could dream up anything possible. There is still hope for a much better adaptation of McCay's creation though, as the previous attempts for this feature in the past have shown. Only time will tell once Nemo gets the proper adaptation he's deserved all along.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Why?
Gmork-224 September 1998
It's sad to see this type of movie put down as a children's movie, because it's a cartoon. The dialogue isn't only not kid-like, but very refreshing in a cartoon. The art, and the colors... the music, all melts together into a work of art unappreciated by the general public. So I ask thee, why?
24 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A visual delight
DogePelis20151 April 2021
It has a simple plot, but the animation is very eye-catching and the visual style is excellent; a good dream adventure.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Could have been one of the best animated movies...
eccentric1920 February 2005
This movie is a good movie.. It had the potential to be one of the best animated movies of the 80s or early 90s had Miyazaki and Takahata stayed involved in the project... Apparently they only were able to work on the first few scenes from 1982 to 1983.. Watching it today i can see where the effort in the movie stops and it seems like it becomes just another kiddie movie.. I would love to see this movie made into a anime series.. I think it would be "the anime series" of the decade... It's a good movie and could have and would have been a hit had the studio left it's creative team alone to work on the project but i'm sure Miyazaki and Takahata got the last laugh when they saw the outcome of it. I gave it a 5 out of 10 because it's a nice film i enjoyed as a 11 or 12 y/o and that's pretty much that bottom line for this film.. Just something nice for kids to watch...
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
About dreams and nightmares
SilverOrlov24 October 2020
It was very unexpected to stumble upon my childhood's cartoon at my 32. Now, when I was watching it, it was just interesting, but suddenly, I remembered how much it impressed me in past... and scared me. Along with "FernGully" and "Once Upon a Forest" it was one of the most exciting cartoon for a child with its dense dark atmosphere time to time.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dreams vs nightmares= good vs evil in a beautifully animated and imaginative film
TheLittleSongbird14 October 2009
I saw Little Nemo: Adeventures in Slumberland on YouTube last night, having vague memories of seeing it once as a child. I just want to say I loved it; it is such a beautiful imaginative movie, that is a must-see for everyone. There is so much to recommend this wonderful movie, and the rest of this review will aim to explain why the film was so good.

The animation is stunning. Yes, I know some of the characters' faces were rather pale, but the backgrounds are colourful and lush, and the scenes in the sky were jaw-dropping. The songs by the Sherman Brothers, who brought us Mary Poppins, Jungle Book, Aristocats and Chitty Chitty Bang Bang are lovely and memorable. Some bring a subtle touch to scenes, while others are jolly and fun.

The characters are a delight. Nemo is still a likable character, if a rather unlikely hero. Icarus is hilarious, Camille has her good moments, King Morpheus reminds me of Santa, Captain Genius is great fun but my favourite has be Flip. As for the vocal talents they were exceptional, the standout easily being Mickey Rooney in a fitfully amusing turn as Flip. The story is highly imaginative and beautifully told, with some subtle moments and some dark ones. I will admit what I remembered most about this movie as a child was the Nightmare King. Young children may find him frightening, but he is such an effective villain. Who cares if he looks a little like Chernabog from Fantasia, he is still a scary and great villain in my eyes.

All in all, a beautiful, imaginative and underrated film. 10/10 of course! Bethany Cox
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I waited 10 years...for this??!!
blacklaetherglove15 April 2006
I wanted to see this movie very badly when I was a pre-teen, maybe 10 or 11. It looked so cute, like a lot of the movies at that time. I remember Christopher Lloyd & his various guises in the voice acting world, and imagined this to be of a similar calibur. How sadly I was mistaken. Unlike Disney, whose calculated quality assures something you will enjoy, whether you like it or not, this is an animated feature with liitle charm & little to keep my interest. The characters felt like something snatched from Don Bluth, but with none of the individuality or charm. The half-hearted, unpleasant musical number (I only remember one: when Nemo is being instructed in the proper way to conduct himself, reading books, standing up straight & such) is painful to watch, and I wished that Nemo had resisted the adult forces. He didn't. The plot in predictable & contrived. Think Pandora's box meets the standard "let's go on a journey to find ____, meet new friends, learn something important about ourselves..." type plot. As cool as the scene with the bed coming alive & leaping thru the rooftops looks, don't put yourself thru the torture that is this movie.
2 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Amazing cartoon!
ivanmessimilos26 November 2020
Little Nemo is one of the unusual cartoons. The reason is a combination of Japanese animation and American script and English borrowed voices. Originally, Nemo was actually a comic created in 1905 (yes, it's so old) by author Winsor McCay and followed the unusual adventures of Nemo in his dreams where he would usually wake up in the last picture of the comic. He used his son Robert for the template for Nemo and drew a comic that came out, intermittently, for over 20 years. The animated version went through problems, the script changed like the screenwriters and in the end we got the aforementioned combination where we have a Japanese director, an American screenwriter and English actors. Even the great Miyazaki participated in the beginnings as early as the first half of the 80s, but he leaves because of disagreements and himself later declares that this work was one of the worst experiences of his life. Side note: the script eventually went to Chris Columbus who is best known as the director of the first two films Home Alone and the first two films of Harry Potter. The film was originally released in cinemas in Japan in 1989, and after 3 years in America. He received mixed reviews and did not earn close to what was expected, however, later on by going on VHS he gained a lot of popularity and today enjoys a cult status with a certain audience.

In the film, we also follow the boy Nemo who goes to Slumberland in a dream, meets various characters such as Professor Genius, King Morpheus, Princess Camille, clown Flip, and is always accompanied by Icarus, the flying squirrel. All characters have appropriate names. I can say that this is by no means an easy cartoon. Nemo reflects reality in his dreams (which is logical), he often wakes up and we can't always be sure what a dream is and what isn't, at least not while watching. We have a situation where something unusual happens, so we know that it is a dream, but then Nemo wakes up, but strange things start happening again, which means that the second dream has started, that is, that Nemo dreams while dreaming. I remind you that this is a cartoon for kids and that Inception comes out a full twenty years after. There is one more thing I have to mention. When the nightmare starts and we meet the Nightmare King (I said the names are appropriate) quite intense, scary and dark scenes appear. Whoever watched knows what I'm talking about. Since I was 5-6 years old when I first watched those scenes, they were the scariest thing in my life, we have nightmares myself (haha ingenious when you think about it) because of the King of Nightmares. When I looked at him again as an adult, I can absolutely understand why this was scary for me (and I believe many other children) to watch. A nightmare is a de facto nightmare. I have to commend this film for its courage and determination to insert a little more serious themes into the children's cartoon, making it a little more complicated than the average cartoon. That is why I think that it is unique and that it can offer something to adults who watch it together with children. They will not be bored or monotonous for sure.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not worth all the effort that went into this
rdoyle2917 October 2022
This effort to combine Japanese and American animation notoriously went through nearly a decade of development hell. Gary Kurtz was an original producer, who got Ray Bradbury to draft a screenplay. Both Hayao Miyazaki and Isao Takahata were going to direct at different points in time, but neither really liked Bradbury's screenplay and both left. (Ideas that were proposed for this film ended up as several later Studio Ghibli films) Brad Bird, Osamu Dezaki and Moebius were all involved at some point. The final film is co-written by Chris Columbus, has songs by the Sherman brothers and was co-directed by folks best known for their work on television.

Was it worth all this effort? No, not really. I really can't stand Columbus and this feels like his work. The characters are bland and uninteresting. The plot is uninteresting. This is a project that had input from a lot of people with pretty wild imaginations, and apart from some really interesting visual ideas, not much made the finished film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Visually arresting and wildly imaginative.
DrezenMedia16 June 2009
I just finished watching it and I enjoyed it a lot. The animation is superb for a non-Disney film (after all, Disney is pretty hard to top), the characters are very interesting, though some could have been developed just a little bit further. The music is pretty good, I mean, it's the Sherman Brothers! The only problem I have with this film is the dialogue, which at times is GOD AWFUL. With the other elements of this film such as the story, characters, art direction, being as strong as they are, I can forgive the poorly written dialogue. This was a co-production between the US & Japan after all, so there was bound to be problems with the translation (Godzilla movies anyone?). Of all the characters, I found Flip to be the best. Mickey Rooney was perfectly cast in the part. I don't know if he was involved during the film's original production or just for the US redub, but he brings a great deal of wit and charm to the character. Altogether, this is a great film and I recommend it very highly, especially for budding animators. There's a lot in this film to get inspiration from.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quite Good
gregberne1116 December 2019
The animation could be better but you have to remember this is from 1989. The story is quite good, as are the voice actors. It's the kind of thing kids (as long as they're older than toddlers) will enjoy watching but that also won't make parents bored to death. It's a good animated film.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Exhausting and takes too long to find its plot
gmaileatsyourlunch29 December 2023
In his dreams, Nemo is transported to the magical Slumberland where he learns the King of Slumberland has chosen him as his successor. Those are the only two plot points of the first half of the film. The rest of that time Nemo is introduced to character after character amid rote musical numbers that quickly feel exhausting. There's s almost no break from the bombastic score and visually impressive but empty-feeling set pieces. This would be okay if it was done in a charming, energetic, creative or plot-driving way, but the main purpose seems to be to show off the animation (which is quite good).

By the time the plot actually starts to unfold, I was mostly checked out. It didn't help that the characters are written rather flat and the voice actors didn't impress me either. They aren't terrible, but like the rest of the film, they don't inspire.

This was a troubled production and its lack of focus and "way too many cooks" problems are very clearly on the screen, though at the least it does manage to not fly apart completely. Still it never rises above mediocre and felt like work to get through.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Original
hollyatme7 May 2021
Creative. Not your average movie. I love the uniqueness. Animation is awesome. Thank you.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A decent adaptation of Winsor McCay's masterpiece Warning: Spoilers
The Little Nemo strips are some of the most beautiful comics ever made, being wonderfully whimsical in each one of its vignettes.

Adapting such kind of episodic work must have been a rather difficult task, hence why the plot of the comic had to be altered in order to follow a more conventional narrative, featuring a hero's journey against a villain (A character resembling Chernabog that didn't exist in the source material), a typical battle of good versus evil.

The first pilot version directed by Sadao Tsukioka is the one that followed the spirit of the comics more closely, the Yoshifumi Kondo and the Osamu Dezaki version would have been interesting to watch too; while this a charming movie, I think there have been certain aspects from it that could have been furtherly explored.

That being said, this is still a decent effort to adapt the work of Winsor McCay, and I sincerely have very little faith in the upcoming live-action flick from Netflix.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
wow
propaul8017 June 2005
This movie was great when I was a very young child. I watched it all the time. Now that I revisit this film, I can't even believe how insane it is. This film is best enjoyed if you are high or drunk because thats what this movie makes you feel like. The way the creator of this movie created this film is very interesting. If you are a child, this film seems to be perfect as if there are no mistakes at all. Once you see the film again, you start to question how you could have ever liked it. If you are stoned this movie would be perfect for you. So if you are over the age of 5,don't watch this movie unless you are on acid or something along those lines :-).
6 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed