El Mariachi (1992) Poster

(1992)

User Reviews

Review this title
149 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Robert Rodriguez's feature film debut!!
Captain_Couth16 August 2005
El Mariachi (1992) was a fine debut for film maker Robert Rodriguez. He makes the most of his minuscule budget and makes a very entertaining action film. The story behind the making of the film is even more interesting than the movie itself. You can tell from this movie that Robert Rodriguez had a bright future in the movie business.

The story is about a musician who's trying to find work in a Mexican border town. None of the places he visits wants to hire a guitar player for their business. Meanwhile another man comes to town carrying a guitar case, he's no musician. He's a notorious hit man for a local gangster. When their paths cross, nothing but trouble lies ahead for the El Mariachi. Can the poor dude survive the week without being killed? Who is this guitar carrying killer? Why is he in town? What are the local crime boss' motives? To find out you'll have to watch EL MARIACHI!!!

An interesting debut that showed lots of promise. The movie was followed by a pseudo-sequel/remake a few years later with a bigger budget and a cast filled with a lot of named actors.

Highly recommended.
23 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Its a good small budget film
patomartinezfgo20 May 2017
I have loved some of Robert Rodriguez's later works like Sin City, so I was pretty excited to see this movie.

The movie is extremely small budget and it really feels like it is more expensive than that. I mean, Robert Rodriguez makes this movie look like it had much more money spent on it, and that is because of his creativity and resourcefulness.

The directing is really good. I loved many of the shots and scenes in this movie and the way they are edited.

My problem with the film or at least my dilemma is... I just find this movie OK. The main actor and character itself is pretty lousy, the movie is too long for its own good, and the story is just OK.

Many people argue that this might be justified because of the low budget. But I do believe that all of the story problems don't have anything to do with the budget. It is not as if I don't like low-budget films, I LOVE "The Evil Dead" and other low-budget films. I just find this movie uneventful, and sometimes boring.

I think this film is the kind of film you should only watch once and move on with your life. I do recommend you to watch it though.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good debut movie
ivanmessimilos6 July 2021
I really appreciate this work from Robert Rodriguez. The so-called low-budget film, shot for just $ 7,000, and Rodriguez put his heart and soul into this film. He was a director, a screenwriter, a producer, he did effects, he did absolutely everything except acting. He was even tested for some drugs because they paid him for it, all to raise money and make a movie. From that aspect, the film looks extremely good. However, some flaws are visible, such as the camera or wooden acting, at times the film is too raw, but all this is understandable.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the greatest low budget movies of the last twenty years, and still an inspiration to wanna be movie makers around the world.
Infofreak3 December 2003
Warning: Spoilers
'El Mariachi' should still be regarded as an inspiration to wanna be movie makers around the world. For around US$7,000 Robert Rodriguez created one of the most enjoyable action movies to hit Hollywood since Peckinpah's 'The Getaway'. Once again Rodriguez proves the point that creativity and imagination beat million dollar budgets every time. An obvious concept to most people one would think, but going by the overblown CGI infested crapola at a theatre near you something that mainstream Hollywood STILL doesn't get! Carlos Gallardo played El Mariachi and co-produced with Rodriguez who did just about everything else - writer, director, cinematographer, editor, special effects,etc.etc. I first saw this movie not long after it hit video and I enjoyed it a lot. I recently watched it on DVD for the first time, ten years after I first saw it, and to me it really stands up. (Rodriguez' commentary is also highly recommended to any aspiring director) Personally my favourite Rodriguez movie is 'From Dusk Til Dawn', but 'El Mariachi' comes a close second. It's sequel cum remake 'Desperado' is a better known to most people but despite a budget 1000 times bigger(!) and some "name" actors involved I don't think it has half the energy and fun of the original, one of the greatest low budget movies of the last twenty years.
69 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent, Low-Budget film by a young Robert Rodriguez.
Batkid128 October 2007
This is pretty good for a limited budget film debut. Rodriguez has campiness, Hong Kong-style action sequences, good music and a Western atmosphere.

Carlos Gallardo is good as the main protagonist and it sure is a hoot seeing him jump off of buildings with his guitar, hide in cars and escape at least a dozen assassins.

It's so cool and funny that it reminds the viewer of a Jackie Chan flick with a hint of John Woo as well. Rodriguez does however suffer from the budget due to having the in-between scenes drag on even for a eighty-one minute film project.

I should probably see this film again, in English, because while I'm in Spanish class and saw this on a Telemundo channel, I didn't quite understand this film as much as I could have.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pretty good with so little.
kdavidbushnell15 July 2009
Pretty good with so little. Of course the acting isn't that good at all, nor is the dialog and special effects (only action). But the story, plot and main character are all very likable. I'll admit I am not a Robert Rodriguez fan, I'll Repeat NOT a Robert Rodriguez fan this is my favorite of his work. Where did he turn after Four Rooms (which I didn't even really like) he became Hollywood BS is what he did. He conformed to BS of Hollywood because for an ambitious very cheap independent film he had a promising career. I'm sure others would disagree (just because he's made much money and success in Hollywood) but nonetheless a bunch of BS is what he's done after El Mariachi. The end was good and like I said the plot was simple the story was interesting and the Mariachi was a likable character.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Love it
thejobpicture21 June 2017
I like it. Good example of independent filmmaking. And Rodriguez is one of my favourites. Definitely worth a watch. I watched it many times now and still keeps inspiring me. Story is good and it's well shot by a single man. Would recommend to anyone trying to break in into the industry. Such a nice archivement.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This First One Still The Best In The Trilogy
ccthemovieman-124 December 2006
This movie put director Robert Rodriguez "on the map." He followed up with two sequels: "Desperado" and "Once Upon A Time In Mexico." Not surprising, the best of the three was this low-budget opening film. As Rodriquez had more and more money to spend on the sequels, the stories got more and more carried away with too many explosions and special-effects, losing the charm of this first effort.

Unlike the sequels, this Mexican-made, so it is in Spanish with English subtitles. Don't let that scare you away. There isn't a great deal of dialog so keeping up with the subtitles is very easy.

The movie has very interesting camera closeups and angles as Rodriquez showed he was going to be a stylish director. The story is simple but effective, suspenseful and even with some humor. Unnlike his subsequent films in this trilogy, the action is not overdone here.

The length is also is a plus. At 80 minutes you can be thoroughly entertained in less than an hour-and-a half. The only disappointment to me was the print quality on th DVD, but I got an early edition. There might be better editions out since. It's not fuzzy but it's not sharp, either.

Anyway: highly recommend for actions/crime buffs who like style in their photography, or saw the sequels and would like to know the history of this particular "Mariachi."
33 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
For a director's first movie, this is very well made
Leofwine_draca7 July 2016
Well-known as the film that put director Robert Rodriguez "on the map" – he was able to remake it as an English-language film three years later, as DESPERADO with Antonio Banderas – EL MARIACHI is an entertaining little film that once again shows that it's possible to shoot decent action on a very low budget. In tone it reminds me a lot of the gritty crime thrillers that came out of Turkey in the 1970s, except with more comedy and romance. The story, one of mistaken identity, is kept simple but there are quite a few decent twists as things play out. Rodriguez really gave a tour-de-force effort behind the scenes; not only did he act as director and editor, he also performed most of the other duties behind the camera. His swooping, frenetic, perfectly-edited style brought him to Hollywood's attention and the rest is, as they say, history.

Back to EL MARIACHI, and it's a film with some decent performances – first-timer Carlos Gallardo essays the reluctant hero role with some skill, while Reinol Martinez's thug-turned-assassin packs some real presence, and Peter Marquardt's villain is supremely slimy. I could have done without the wooden Consuelo Gomez in the romance scenes; thankfully she was replaced by Salma Hayek in DESPERADO. Said romance scenes drag the pacing of the film down in the middle and leave a hole of about twenty minutes where not a lot happens.

Thankfully, things pick up for an engaging final shoot-out, and there's always an action scene never too far away. The shoot-outs are a lot of fun, as are the stunts – I especially liked the "bus swing" which shows you need practically no money or CGI effects to create an exciting shot. While the fact that it's a low-budget, Mexican, Spanish-language film – one that Rodriguez regarded as "practice" for his later Hollywood career – work against it and mean that most people will never have seen or heard of it – EL MARIACHI is a fun B-movie that fans of the director will enjoy.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bad haircuts. Bad acting. GREAT movie!
gigodagno21 October 2003
This is a flawed movie. The actors are, for the most part, mediocre. Even worse is their hair. But some elements make this a very fun film to watch. A guitar case full of guns, an evil gringo, a "modern mariachi" who plays the keyboard, some hilarious fast forward scenes, and the ugliest motorcycle ever made. Also at the beginning there is one great voice over, when El Mariachi is walking on the road along with a turtle. Dramatic scenes like this are mixed with humorous ones (some intended to be funny, some not), and that makes the film interesting.

If you know a bit of spanish, you'll appreciate the fact that the characters speak very slowly, which allows you to watch the film without subtitles. Also, I recommend watching Desperado right after El Mariachi, you'll understand the mythology of it and enjoy it more.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Frenetic.
Peach-229 November 1998
I know the budget for this film was somewhere between 5000 and 7000 dollars, but I would like to comment more on the pacing and frenetic film style Rodriguez bestows upon us. Low budget or not,this film has energy. It never lets down for more than a few minutes and the editing is amazing. Robert Rodriguez has such a knowledge of film-making that he makes this movie look like a million bucks easy. The film isn't perfect, but on sheer energy alone it will entertain you more than most over-blown Hollywood action films.
30 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great movie, with bad acting.
Syd-417 March 1999
Here the proof. This is not obligatory to have a lot of money to make a good movie. Sure with money we can buy good actors, but not a good script with a good story. The only things missing in this movie is good acting and good cameraman.

Before making bad movie like "from dusk till dawn 2 : Texas blood money", Quentin Tarantino and Roger Rodrigez could make a remake of "El Mariachi".
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Nice Film
Uriah4328 September 2012
Let's give credit where credit is due. Although this picture had an extremely low-budget, it goes to prove that a nice film can still be produced if the director has the imagination and talent to pull it off. And let's face it, the sad fact is that there are all too many movies being made today that cost much more than this particular film ($7000) but fail to deliver the same level of satisfaction. The director (Robert Rodriguez) deserves every attribute due to him. The humor was good and there were some social commentaries that I think some people might have missed. That is not to say, however, that this film was necessarily perfect. It wasn't. The acting wasn't great by any means. Neither was the script. But then, the movie was originally produced in Spanish and the version I saw was dubbed in English, so it is possible that some of the dialogue may have been lost in translation. The ending though, was unexpected and abrupt and I didn't quite like it. As far as the characters are concerned, I thought Reinol Martinez (playing the part of the gangster "Azul") did the best. Consuelo Gomez ("Domino") was attractive and put in a fair performance as well. Carlos Gallardo ("El Mariachi") was average at best. The rest of the cast were pretty much forgettable. Having said all of this, the fact that this film was produced with a low budget doesn't mean that a person should lower his standards and give it a higher score than it deserves when it comes to evaluating it. This wasn't "Gone with the Wind" so there's no need to give it an equivalent rating. The bottom line is that it was an enjoyable low-budget film and it made a hefty profit. No need to argue with that.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good morning, Azul. Know who this is?
film-critic17 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Through the heart of independent cinema comes the bold and expressive first film by Robert Rodriguez. While he would go on later to give us some modern day classics, this is the film that jump-started his career. Set in a gritty town of Mexico, a drifter arrives ready to restart a new life and concentrate on his music. He soon learns that this will be a very difficult dream since the moment he steps foot in town he is mistaken for a murderous criminal named Azul. Azul is after his money that Moco (the head boss) has failed to pay him. Moco tries to have Azul killed, but finds it difficult when he carries with him a guitar case filled with guns. After several gun battles, explosions, and a love story with a woman that gives the guitar player his first real gig, our hero finds his life in the mercy of others. It is at this time our Mariachi is reborn.

Rodriguez gives his best direction to date. Perhaps it was the lack of funds or the intensely gritty scenes, but this film helped me realize why cinema is so amazing. It is the perfect story of the small fish making his big mark on a big pond. Rodriguez takes every resource he can and rebuilds the classic concept of mistaken identity. With the fast-framed photography and interesting choice of camera angles, he takes a straightforward story and builds a legend. I enjoyed watching this film because although it was made for just a simple $7,000, the production doesn't look cheap. I have seen Hollywood blockbusters that have looked like they squandered their money more than Rodriguez did. I was just impressed with the quality of the film and the story that I suddenly felt myself totally immersed into the story.

Oddly, it is the story that never falters throughout this picture. Normally, when you have a lower cost on budget, a segment of a film will suffer. Sometimes it is the character development, other times it is the story. Nothing is forgotten about in this film. There is plenty of violence (for all you action fans out there), some powerful drama (dealing with his dreams), and some comedy that will keep you grinning from ear to ear. By having this strong balance, our hero emerges with the utmost confidence, our villain seems diabolically evil, and therefore leading into moments of sheer joy, constantly wondering what will happen next. I was rooting for everyone in this film because I felt something for each. Only through the careful eye and artistic direction of Rodriguez could such a feat be accomplished.

I have nothing negative to say about this film. From the moment the first turtle walked across the screen until the very end, I enjoyed every aspect of this picture. I suggest this movie to anyone that has ever thought about making a film, but was concerned about budget. I also suggest this film to anyone who loves a good story, amazing action, and characters that literally jump out of the screen like comic book heroes.

Grade: ***** out of *****
38 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The First Mariachi
CrassActionHero23 October 2006
This is indeed the First installment of the El Mariachi series. However, this is the most "real" of them all.

The movie starts with a known drug lord and a vigilante at war in Mexico. The drug lord betrayed the vigilante and the vigilante simply wants his money back and he will go away or blood will be spilled. The drug lord is not going to comply.

Then our hero is merely a drifter who is just looking for work. Bad timing. The vigilante carries a guitar case full of weapons. The drifter is just a mariachi with a guitar. The mariachi and the vigilante also dress the same. Mistaken identity. Here we go!

The acting is great. It all feels so real. The story is pretty good. The action is the best part, it's not over the top. It's very good and feels real. Our hero is not a weapons expert, he has not used a gun in his life. He has to fend for himself. Well done. The dialog is good too.

The Last Word: Cool. The first mariachi film. This is the most realistic of the trilogy. The action feels real, the story is good, and the casting is great. Also the villain is just a roach. Entertaining.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Simple but fun fare for the grindhouse crowd
wandereramor12 September 2011
There's a certain kind of gleeful, almost childish energy to the low-budget grindhouse aesthetic, something that a lot of directors (including Rodriguez) have tried to capture artificially in recent years (to decidedly mixed results, but that's a different story.) El mariachi, however, has the genuine article in spades, and that's probably it's greatest virtue. At heart it's a mistaken-identity comedy about an assassin and a mariachi who get mixed up with tragic results. The central conceit is essentially comedic, and the violence sometimes gets so over the top you have to laugh, but for the most part El Mariachi plays it straight -- which only makes it more fun. I was fortunate enough to see this movie on a big screen with a big audience as part of a film class, and that's really the only way to watch it -- with an audience hooting and laughing along, creating that raucous carnivalesque atmosphere that mainstream movies are too tame and wannabe-respectable for. I suspect El Mariachi might just seem flat if I watched it on my own, however -- after all, there are a lot of parts that are too goofy for their own good, and more than a bit of exploitation. Still, there's something to be said for the communal act of moviewatching, and El Mariachi was able to evoke that experience that none of the classical or art-house movies did for that class. Not one to seriously contemplate, but a fun one to watch with friends nonetheless.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An inspiration
TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews1 August 2009
This deserves to be remembered. A young, enthusiastic man named Robert proved a number of things about film-making. Such as that low-budget doesn't have to mean "bad", that "inexpensive" and "cheap" can be two different notions, and that, today, everyone and anyone can make a movie, something which he has since gone on to release self-made documentaries in order to further encourage, and educate about the possibilities of. He knew he didn't have a big studio backing him, and he refused to do what so many others have done in that position, and give in to the idea of the end result being poor. Instead, he made every effort and put all that he was able to put up on the screen, and went a couple of places that Hollywood, out of fear of lost profit, doesn't dare to go often enough. Yes, he got a lucky break. That doesn't change the fact that this can fuel the dreams of other hopefuls, and, along with Tarantino's Reservoir Dogs, has allowed independent cinema to not purely be deeply artistic pieces, but also hold mainstream-audience-friendly genre-flicks. The plot bears the marks of not having a skilled or experienced writer behind it, though the characterization, what there is of it, is pretty good, if the people tend to be types we've seen elsewhere. It should be noted that this was made for Rodriguez to practice, he didn't expect it to be a success. I stand by that he fares considerably better when he has someone else provide the script, a theory backed up by more or less everything he's made. He's visual, he puts together cool images, that's what he excels at. His cartoonist side shows, as well, in the somewhat warped sense of humor, and while he goes kind of far in some places, this can still be viewed by most. The pace is fast, and the almost 80 minutes fly by. He gets a lot of energy into the majority of this, partially on account of the rather frequent cuts(since he pieced it together from takes that had the bits required, instead of redoing entire setups). The action is well-done, and bigger than you might think, for the whole thing costing so little. Since the actors are untrained, the performances are average. The dialog varies, and surely it's never less than passable. Cinematography and editing help prove how much RR put into this. The music is great, throughout. I haven't watched a dubbed version, so I can't vouch for the quality of that. This has disturbing content and violence. The DVD comes with Bedhead, well-done short, a theatrical trailer, the first of his "Ten Minute" featurettes, and an informative Director's Commentary. And hey, this can help you learn Spanish, if that interests you, since the lines are spoken slower than usual with the language, and pronounced clearly. I recommend this to anyone who wishes to view it, especially fans of the multi-talent who created it. 7/10
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
a bang of a debut
Quinoa198429 April 2000
Robert Rodriguez has his first little/big film here that is by no means big money wise. The book written by Rodriguez, Rebel Without a Crew, illustrates this point very well, but to see the film in its present form you might wonder if it really cost more than he says. But it's this same grit that adds to its rough charm, like a slightly more cartoonish, crazy and action-packed film in the vein of Night of the Living Dead (shoe-string done with a level of truth for what the genre material needs). The budget for this film was 7000. That is the cheapest price for a film given wide release I've still heard of, and probably is. And watching this film I noticed that a lot the big hundreds of millions of dollars spent on other films, while usually bankrolled with high-powered Hollywood casts and immense crews working on special effects, they lost an intensity that this film has even in its brief quiet scenes. Plus, as in the rest of the Mariachi films, it's often got a slick, quick sense of humor where Rodriguez's compositions say almost all there needs to be said. The story shows a singing musician (El Mariachi) who is not looking for trouble, but everyone is wanting to kill a man carrying a guitar case, which he has. It's a nifty little classic of exploitation/action that was meant for video markets but doesn't compromise. It's even got OK acting.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not Antonio but really good
iwatcheverything3 September 2003
Most people do not know that this is part one to Desperado. I just got to see this film recently and was quite impressed. The acting was not bad for probably most of their first times. There was good comic relief in the film to lower some of the drama but not too much to take away from the film itself. I believe this film is a good watch and has gotten a pretty high score from me. Check it out if you get a chance.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dynamic debut...
poe4262 February 2005
Jaded, perhaps, by years of toiling in the Public Access field (and having sat through scores of first, foundering efforts by scores of foundering aspiring filmmakers), I was taken completely by surprise by the remarkable Robert Rodriguez's first film. As sure and as "polished" as any feature, EL MARIACHI belies its no-budget roots and stands as a testament to determination- and talent. If you're one of those whose attention span precludes sitting down and actually reading Rodriguez's book REBEL WITHOUT A CREW, I recommend obtaining a DVD featuring his "ten-minute film school." And pay very close attention: There'll be a quiz afterward.
14 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
All I wanted was to be a mariachi, like my ancestors.
lastliberal28 August 2007
I bought this film and Desparados on Region 2 by mistake and so it sat on my shelf for a long time. Fortunately, my new computer plays Region 2, so I got to see it again in Hi Def.

It was as good as I remembered. No, it's not high quality, but it is fantastic considering that it was written, directed, shot, and edited by one person - Robert Rodriguez. It was his experiment, and he showed his talent and what can be done for $7,000.

He even used his friend to star in the film. The non-actor Carlos Gallardo was perfect for the role and made the film more believable. Even the little town of Ciudad Acuña added realism to the film.

An inspiration to filmmakers everywhere.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
loved it
laduerfahrd23 January 2018
Loved it. He started well. What happened? Does anyone have a hunch about why evertyhing went "down hill" after El Mariachi? The more money he got later on, the less edge his films had.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A stunningly inexpensive achievement.
Pavel-81 November 2003
When Robert Rodriguez's "El Mariachi" was released back in the early '90s, it received a tremendous amount of press because it was made for a measly $7,000. Thanks to about a million dollars of marketing, the film exploded first onto the indie scene, then into mainstream cinema. With two expensive sequels, 1995's "Desperado" ($7 million) and this fall's "Once Upon a Time in Mexico" ($30 million), the original film has garnered even more attention.

"El Mariachi" tells a simple tale of mistaken identity. The protagonist and title character is a mere wandering mariachi looking for work, until he is confused with an escaped prisoner. Then of course, all hell breaks loose. Bullets fly and the fun begins.

Strictly on its cinematic merits, "El Mariachi" is not as great as you have probably heard. The story, as I described, is nothing special. The acting doesn't detract at all from the movie, but no one stands out either. There are a number of continuity errors; shots within individual scenes are inconsistently lit; some of the cuts seem unusual; and the special effects are elementary. The technical aspects, except the necessarily innovative cinematography, are not quite up to Hollywood standards. All of this would not seem to add up to a classic independent film.

But the borderline crude nature of all these pieces add up to a fascinating film, and they do that for one reason: Robert Rodriguez. His creativity and vision collide with his lack of money to produce a fascinating film. Filling virtually every major role on the crew, he creates a style all his own. Within this style, all of the "problems" are transformed into resourcefulness and creativity, the product of which is a consistent look akin to what he forged in Once Upon a Time in Mexico and his other films.

This uniformity alters one's perspective on the entire film and its parts. A basic story somehow grabs your attention. There is a charm to the naivete of the actors. The lighting often proves to be a refreshingly unique change from the norm. Continuity problems can willingly be ignored. Even the meager special effects aren't much of a distraction. The almost dizzying editing actually enhances the tale's frenetic nature. On top of all of this, Rodriguez utilizes unique zooms, angles, frame rates, and film speeds that give the flick an playful visual look not often found.

Bottom Line: While none of these aforementioned pieces would work all that well individually, Rodriguez uses these tools to morph a dusty Mexican fable into a cartoonishly enjoyable story that dollar-for-dollar may be the best movie ever made. 8 of 10.

(Side note: The new DVD is one of the best I've seen. Not necessarily in scope, but in content. Rodriguez's nonpareil information about a remarkable piece of filmmaking is simply superb. Well worth your $15.)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Get real! Even for $7000!
george-8114 April 1999
I know it's his first film, and I know he only spent $7000. But still... How can Ebert say this is a good movie? It's pathetic, for a commercial product. Maybe for a family movie fest, featuring all the relatives. But the actors, other than the Mariachi, the joint girlfriend, and the real hit man, are so stiff and artificial that it was a pain to watach them. This "Moco" guy is such a bad actor that I can't believe the director couldn't liven him up any. There are a couple of cute scenes, but by and large this is not worth watching. I just had to in view of all the fuss everyone made. Don't bother.
15 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed