2 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :- Very Watchable, 26 septiembre 2005
Author:
Theo Robertson de Isle Of Bute , Scotland
A film doesn't have to be good to be entertaining and GIRLS IN PRISON
is a case in point . The intelligence of the script starts and ends
with a discussion of The Korean War
" It's supposed to be a police action "
" Yeah ? Then why the hell didn't they send cops "
Which is dialogue that will be forever synonymous with Samuel Fuller
who used the line in another film set around The Korean War . But after
this exchange strange things start happening where we're shown live
footage for the battlefront , something that didn't happen till 'Nam .
The McCarthy witch hunts are alluded to but somehow feel overblown and
false while someone refers to an ashtray that was given to him by " The
King " . What in 1952 ? Maybe he meant the King of England ?
I won't go into too much detail but in a contrived series of events a
teenage girl called Aggie O'Hanlon finds herself serving a life
sentence for a crime she didn't commit , and it's essential for anyone
wanting to enjoy this TVM that they turn off their brain because
there's plenty of things that don't make sense . For example a couple
of inmates called Melba and Carol promise to protect Aggie . It's never
revealed why they do this . Obviously being lesbian lovers it's very
easy to jump to the conclusion that they want to involve the sweet and
innocent Aggie in female love games but this isn't their motive at all
because there is never any explanation for their motive , the audience
just have to accept this without question .
The audience have to accept a lot of things that defy credibility as
the plot twists and turns but I have to confess I felt very involved in
all this , yeah I know melodramatic and far fetched doesn't even begin
to describe this movie but it is enjoyable thanks to the good looking
cast ( Yes there is some T&A ) and some impressive pastal coloured
cinematography from Jean De Segonzac
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- Someone forgot to tell the cast(except Anne) and crew that this was supposed to be fun., 20 julio 2003
Author:
Son_of_Mansfield de Mansfield, Pennsylvania.
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
May contain slight spoilers
The cop tells Melba "You have five seconds to drop your weapon and live",
Carol's father stares with wide eyes and repeats "are you a communist?"
afer
being attacked by a mob of morons, and when the private detective offers
to
help the innocent girl, he states "I'll strip her naked, tie her up, take
her to the woods, then starve her until she confeses." There was nothing
wrong with script, but only Anne Heche seemed to realize that this movie
should be played for laughs. I might have been able to not take this movie
seriously if everyone involved had giving a good example. Instead, this
was
one of the longest 82 minutes I have sat through in quite some time. Do
not
believe the back of the case, which boast of great bad girl performances
and
steamy shower scenes, there are no bad girls and the shower scenes appear
to
have been filmed by a blind, fourteen year old boy. The girls are very
nice
to look at, but only Anne Heche distinguishes herself. She is surprisingly
attractive with long black hair and she gives a pleasantly off
performance.
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- A pretty good mystery/thriller . . ., 27 junio 2001
Author:
vepope
With the usual plot twists that keep you interested. An added bonus is Ann
Heche (and many other actresses) in some graphic shower scenes. I liked it,
for some light entertainment. It was good enough to keep me from changing
the channel, but I don't feel compelled to watch it every time it comes
on.
2 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :- Goofy, 23 agosto 2001
Author:
Dan Harkless de Irvine, California
An odd film. It can't decide whether it wants to be a tribute to 50s/60s
"girls behind bars" exploitation pictures, a pseudo-political satire, or a
crime drama. In better hands, it might have straddled those genres
effectively, but as it is, it's more than a little scattershot.
In some sense, the film only seems to be sure of itself when it lapses into
"lipstick lesbians in jail" exploitation. Personally, I could have done
with more of that material, but then I watched the emasculated basic cable
version on Lifetime. In retrospect, I'd recommend renting the video so you
don't have to miss out on any of the "sexuality/nudity", and so you won't
have to put up with the lame-o profanity overdubs. One particularly
egregious dialogue change (judging from context and lip-reading) was "I
shot
his balls off" to "I blew his brains out", which renders the followup line
"there was nothing to sew back on" utterly nonsensical.
Most of the laughs in the film are unintentional rather than
written.
The lack of acting from the character who stabs herself got a big laugh
from
me. The only *good* acting in the film to speak of comes from Anne Heche,
who puts more work into her role than you'd expect. Lots of nice bits of
business that I can tell were her idea rather than scripted or directed,
since her scenes are the only ones with that kind of quality. Oh, I guess
Miguel Sandoval (the "digger" in Jurassic Park) has a couple of nice
moments
as well.
All in all, about what you would expect from legendary (to MST3K fans, at
least) schlock producer Samuel Z. Arkoff, who also directed the unrelated
1956 film with the same title. Worth viewing if you're an Anne Heche fan
or
have nothing better to do, but don't go out of your way.
Don't take it serious and you'll probably like it., 13 abril 1999
Author:
Langmaier, Sigrid
Funny how people see the same things in such different ways. Although the
movie is classified as action/drama I have to say I laughed so hard I almost
fell off the chair. This movie would have been a greater success if it had
been classified as comedy. The characters are so stereotype that the movie
seems to make fun of the kind of genre it is actually supposed to represent.
The problem is, that it takes itself serious, otherwise I think I would have
liked it. I am not quite sure whether it is just a bad movie or if it is
really bad enough to be interesting. In any case - I am still amused about
it. (Besides, Anne Heche is hilarious as the bad girl).
1 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :- Neither fish nor...well, it is pretty foul, 25 julio 1999
Author:
jmydgeek de alaska
This should be a campy, cheesy riot, an homage to exploitation films.
Instead, it just is one. It seems they didn't feel like trying hard enough
to make good schlock, and counted on the camp element to excuse the lack of
quality on the serious level.
I thought that this would be like 'Mars Attacks' with shower scenes. There
were two of those, and I have to say I enjoyed them. But as Joe Bob Briggs
says, the plot gets in the way of the story.
Don't let the appellation MADE FOR TV throw you off the scent. This movie
was made for cable TV, and like any good 'girls in prison' movie, it has 2
really good shower scenes!
Also, as it is set in the 1950's, Anne Heche gets to wear some clothes that
would look right at home on Grace Kelly.
0 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- Hot showers frame a cold story, 18 abril 2007
Author:
lastliberal de Florida
There are two shower scenes where we are treated to incredible views of
my favorite psychologist (Anne Heche from Prozac Nation) and the lovely
Ione Skye. This was definitely not a CBS Schoolbreak Special with Missy
Crider and TV regular Bahni Turpin.
Outside of these shower scenes was the cheesiest dialog that I have
ever heard. I cannot believe this movie even had a script. I am sure
the actresses were told just told use whatever cheesy prison dialog you
can think of. It was painful to listen to. They threw in dialog about
the Korean War and McCathyism to set the times, but it was just
terrible.
It would have been a much better production if they had 80 minutes of
shower scenes and 3 minutes of dialog, instead of the other way around.
0 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- The big suck, 23 enero 2004
Author:
deejemon
This may well be the crappest movie ever made. Completely unbelievable,
stupid, stupid plot, even stupider dialog, and seems to have been written
by
someone using bad lesbian prison porn as their benchmark.
If you didn't hate Anne Heche already, you will after you see
this.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosreparto y equipo completostrivialidadesofficial sitesfrases célebresOverview
información principalinformación combinadareparto y equipo completoscréditos de compañíastv schedulePremios y críticas
comentarios de los usuarioscríticas externascríticas de grupos de usuariosawardsCalificacionesparents guiderecomendacionesmessage boardArgumento y citas
argumentoplot synopsispalabras clave del argumentosinopsis Amazon.comfrases célebresCosas divertidas
trivialidadespifiastemas musicalescréditos extravagantesotras versionesenlaces entre películaspreguntas frecuentesOtro tipo de información
enlaces a productosbox office/businessfechas de estrenolugares de rodajeespecificaciones técnicasLaserdiscDVDlecturas relacionadasNewsDeskMaterial promocional
frases comercialestrailers and videoscarteles y enlacesphoto galleryEnlaces externos
enlaces a cinesofficial sitesmisceláneosfotografíassound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Girls in Prison (1994) (TV)
2 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :-

Very Watchable, 26 septiembre 2005
Author: Theo Robertson de Isle Of Bute , Scotland
A film doesn't have to be good to be entertaining and GIRLS IN PRISON is a case in point . The intelligence of the script starts and ends with a discussion of The Korean War
" It's supposed to be a police action "
" Yeah ? Then why the hell didn't they send cops "
Which is dialogue that will be forever synonymous with Samuel Fuller who used the line in another film set around The Korean War . But after this exchange strange things start happening where we're shown live footage for the battlefront , something that didn't happen till 'Nam . The McCarthy witch hunts are alluded to but somehow feel overblown and false while someone refers to an ashtray that was given to him by " The King " . What in 1952 ? Maybe he meant the King of England ?
I won't go into too much detail but in a contrived series of events a teenage girl called Aggie O'Hanlon finds herself serving a life sentence for a crime she didn't commit , and it's essential for anyone wanting to enjoy this TVM that they turn off their brain because there's plenty of things that don't make sense . For example a couple of inmates called Melba and Carol promise to protect Aggie . It's never revealed why they do this . Obviously being lesbian lovers it's very easy to jump to the conclusion that they want to involve the sweet and innocent Aggie in female love games but this isn't their motive at all because there is never any explanation for their motive , the audience just have to accept this without question .
The audience have to accept a lot of things that defy credibility as the plot twists and turns but I have to confess I felt very involved in all this , yeah I know melodramatic and far fetched doesn't even begin to describe this movie but it is enjoyable thanks to the good looking cast ( Yes there is some T&A ) and some impressive pastal coloured cinematography from Jean De Segonzac
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-

Someone forgot to tell the cast(except Anne) and crew that this was supposed to be fun., 20 julio 2003
Author: Son_of_Mansfield de Mansfield, Pennsylvania.
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
May contain slight spoilers
The cop tells Melba "You have five seconds to drop your weapon and live", Carol's father stares with wide eyes and repeats "are you a communist?" afer being attacked by a mob of morons, and when the private detective offers to help the innocent girl, he states "I'll strip her naked, tie her up, take her to the woods, then starve her until she confeses." There was nothing wrong with script, but only Anne Heche seemed to realize that this movie should be played for laughs. I might have been able to not take this movie seriously if everyone involved had giving a good example. Instead, this was one of the longest 82 minutes I have sat through in quite some time. Do not believe the back of the case, which boast of great bad girl performances and steamy shower scenes, there are no bad girls and the shower scenes appear to have been filmed by a blind, fourteen year old boy. The girls are very nice to look at, but only Anne Heche distinguishes herself. She is surprisingly attractive with long black hair and she gives a pleasantly off performance.
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-

A pretty good mystery/thriller . . ., 27 junio 2001
Author: vepope
With the usual plot twists that keep you interested. An added bonus is Ann Heche (and many other actresses) in some graphic shower scenes. I liked it, for some light entertainment. It was good enough to keep me from changing the channel, but I don't feel compelled to watch it every time it comes on.
2 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-
Goofy, 23 agosto 2001
Author: Dan Harkless de Irvine, California
An odd film. It can't decide whether it wants to be a tribute to 50s/60s "girls behind bars" exploitation pictures, a pseudo-political satire, or a crime drama. In better hands, it might have straddled those genres effectively, but as it is, it's more than a little scattershot.
In some sense, the film only seems to be sure of itself when it lapses into "lipstick lesbians in jail" exploitation. Personally, I could have done with more of that material, but then I watched the emasculated basic cable version on Lifetime. In retrospect, I'd recommend renting the video so you don't have to miss out on any of the "sexuality/nudity", and so you won't have to put up with the lame-o profanity overdubs. One particularly egregious dialogue change (judging from context and lip-reading) was "I shot his balls off" to "I blew his brains out", which renders the followup line "there was nothing to sew back on" utterly nonsensical.
Most of the laughs in the film are unintentional rather than written. The lack of acting from the character who stabs herself got a big laugh from me. The only *good* acting in the film to speak of comes from Anne Heche, who puts more work into her role than you'd expect. Lots of nice bits of business that I can tell were her idea rather than scripted or directed, since her scenes are the only ones with that kind of quality. Oh, I guess Miguel Sandoval (the "digger" in Jurassic Park) has a couple of nice moments as well.
All in all, about what you would expect from legendary (to MST3K fans, at least) schlock producer Samuel Z. Arkoff, who also directed the unrelated 1956 film with the same title. Worth viewing if you're an Anne Heche fan or have nothing better to do, but don't go out of your way.
Don't take it serious and you'll probably like it., 13 abril 1999

Author: Langmaier, Sigrid
Funny how people see the same things in such different ways. Although the movie is classified as action/drama I have to say I laughed so hard I almost fell off the chair. This movie would have been a greater success if it had been classified as comedy. The characters are so stereotype that the movie seems to make fun of the kind of genre it is actually supposed to represent. The problem is, that it takes itself serious, otherwise I think I would have liked it. I am not quite sure whether it is just a bad movie or if it is really bad enough to be interesting. In any case - I am still amused about it. (Besides, Anne Heche is hilarious as the bad girl).
1 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :-

Neither fish nor...well, it is pretty foul, 25 julio 1999
Author: jmydgeek de alaska
This should be a campy, cheesy riot, an homage to exploitation films. Instead, it just is one. It seems they didn't feel like trying hard enough to make good schlock, and counted on the camp element to excuse the lack of quality on the serious level.
I thought that this would be like 'Mars Attacks' with shower scenes. There were two of those, and I have to say I enjoyed them. But as Joe Bob Briggs says, the plot gets in the way of the story.
4 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :-
Made for TV, 4 febrero 2002
Author: JOHN L. SCHINDEL (redhazervn@hotmail.com) de Suburban Chicago
Don't let the appellation MADE FOR TV throw you off the scent. This movie was made for cable TV, and like any good 'girls in prison' movie, it has 2 really good shower scenes!
Also, as it is set in the 1950's, Anne Heche gets to wear some clothes that would look right at home on Grace Kelly.
0 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-

Hot showers frame a cold story, 18 abril 2007
Author: lastliberal de Florida
There are two shower scenes where we are treated to incredible views of my favorite psychologist (Anne Heche from Prozac Nation) and the lovely Ione Skye. This was definitely not a CBS Schoolbreak Special with Missy Crider and TV regular Bahni Turpin.
Outside of these shower scenes was the cheesiest dialog that I have ever heard. I cannot believe this movie even had a script. I am sure the actresses were told just told use whatever cheesy prison dialog you can think of. It was painful to listen to. They threw in dialog about the Korean War and McCathyism to set the times, but it was just terrible.
It would have been a much better production if they had 80 minutes of shower scenes and 3 minutes of dialog, instead of the other way around.
0 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-

The big suck, 23 enero 2004
Author: deejemon
This may well be the crappest movie ever made. Completely unbelievable, stupid, stupid plot, even stupider dialog, and seems to have been written by someone using bad lesbian prison porn as their benchmark. If you didn't hate Anne Heche already, you will after you see this.
Add another comment
Related Links