The Low Life (1995) Poster

(1995)

User Reviews

Review this title
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Sometimes difficult to watch, but excellent nonetheless
paj285 April 2003
It's hard to "love" a movie that taps into the lives of a group of losers who fail to connect with each other and the world, but this was a well acted and mostly well-made film and I enjoyed watching it. Sean Astin was endearing and heartbreaking all at once, definitely a standout performance. One "external review" likened it to a Gen-X "Day of the Locust", but it reminded me a bit of Carson McCuller's "The Heart is a Lonely Hunter". If you can relate to the characters (who hasn't ever felt lonely, detached, unrecognized and without direction at some point?) then you will take away something from this movie.

If you're impatient, don't like movies on the depressing side, or by some luck have never had an unhappy day in your life then you would not like this movie.
17 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
moves kinda slowly, but still worth seeing
lee_eisenberg21 June 2008
For the most part, I thought that "The Low Life" moved pretty slowly. But even so, it's still worth seeing, if only as a character study. The main character is John Martin (Rory Cochrane), who has moved to Los Angeles hoping to make something of himself, but has to separate carbon copies to make ends meet. He has to stay with geeky Andrew (Sean Astin). Surrounded by several different kinds of people, John tries to maintain his identity however possible.

So, there's nothing particularly special about this movie. Maybe it's worth seeing once. But the entire cast does some interesting things with the characters. I think that that's about the best description that I can give; much of the movie confused me.

Also starring Kyra Sedgwick, James Le Gros, J.T. Walsh, Shawnee Smith, and Renee Zellweger in an early role (she plays the poet).
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
No Life in "Low Life"
NJMoon16 February 1999
Promising indy feel to this ultimately pointless pic where LA Yalies can't "get a life" low or otherwise. Leading character is too bleak and internal for movies - oil paintings maybe. Watching paint chips fall from the ceiling would be time better spent. Mrs. Bacon's appearance serves only to provide game-players with one less degree to TV's Identical Cousins and Gomez Addams, who's son Sean is pic's only bright speck.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
man...
sumdenguy13 March 2003
This movie is really good...easily Rory Cochranes best movie as well as Sean Astin's best movie. Sean Astin's character is so easily relateable to if you ever were a geek. The first time I saw this movie, I gushed tears at the end when they played that Journey song. Ron Livingston is always great to watch too. My buddy painted a picture of the end when Rory's character is walking along the street next to the parking meters and as soon as I saw it, I bought it from him. I honestly can't believe that this film has not been put on DVD. Anyways, you need to see this movie. It came out at a time when the Gen-X movies were in full swing and almost cliche, but Sean Astin's character breaks those cliches(when he crumples that lamp, you'll die), it will give Sean Astin a free pass much like Emilio gets a free pass simply because he was Otto.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Crap!
msternny9 May 2008
This is one of the worst movies i have seen to date, the best part was Christian J. Meoli "Leonard" attempting to act jumping up and down outside the bar, kind-of like i wanted to do on the DVD, to spare the rest of humanity the agony of watching this shitty film. It has a great cast so you keep watching waiting for it to get good, i mean with Sean Astin "Andrew" (played his part perfectly, did a great job, too bad it was in this film), Kyra Sedgwick "Bevan", Ron Livingston "Chad", Renée Zellweger "Poet" (they put her name on the cover she has a total of 1 line and less then 4 seconds in the whole movie...

If the cast had any dignity, they would go out and buy all the copies of this film and burn them along with Writer / Director George Hickenlooper and Writer John Enbom
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
BORING FIRST WORLD PROBLEMS
iamjamalwhite18 April 2020
Little Ivey League white boys with problems like drugs, jazzy hands, and boredom. This movie goes nowhere fast. I fell asleep.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
demands respect and appreciation
ringbearer8730 May 2003
The low life is a film that will no doubt leave you depressed and just for that, you know that this film is well made and very successful in it's aim. It's purpose is to portray the low lives of society, the people who are the 'scum' or the under-dogs of the world, the people we always look down on and give dirty looks. This film tells us that there is a reason for them being the way they are and provokes real sympathy. Sean Astin is the strongest link in this film, one can't help but feel so sorry for his character...all he wants is a friend. Viewers will find themselves hanging out for scenes with him. The low life is a very good film, realistic and thought-provoking....not uplifting, but thats how it should be.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
pointless and depressing
joeyford-5534218 April 2020
A hip movie about the boring grind at the bottom, goes nowhere slowly. Lots of san Francisco perversion. Sean Austin is the only shining light here as a lost soul trying to find his way
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
starving artists LA style
cheese_cake23 June 2006
The movie is about three male friends living in Los Angeles. They have just completed college and are working temporary jobs. They have little to no money and it's not clear what exactly they want to do, although one senses they have lofty artistic goals. The main character is typing a novel and is seemingly very jaded. He has seen it all. The facade is chipped by his blossoming relationship with a woman. they have both started to share their true feelings. he also has a roommate desperate for companionship, whom he disdains. good story, good acting, good everything. if you ever wanted to be a starving artist and bogart cool, but now just go to your mind numbing job and sit behind the desk, this movie's for you. walkingintherain.net
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not much redeeming value to this film.
Shankers29 December 1998
I found the characters highly interesting but the plot a little thin and not much redeeming value to this film.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A little sleeper that wakes you up
couple4fun116 May 2000
Fine performances and a believable story revolve around a Yale graduate who is stuck in a rut of temp jobs. His bland friends can't help him get on his feet but a strange new roommate whom he thinks he can't stand actually brings out the life that he has pent up inside. At first glance this film may seem slow, a bit dark, and even depressing, but when examined as a whole after completion it really is a little slice of art with stand out performances from Cochrane, Sedgwick, and Astin.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Proof that Ron Livingston should be paying royalties to Rory Cochrane
MBunge4 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This ode to the young and aspiring on the fringes of Hollywood is as dull as dishwater, as obviously manipulative as the clown at a 6 year old's birthday party and so rote and lifeless it can't even be unintentionally entertaining.

The Low Life focuses on a young man named John (Rory Cochrane). He's newly moved to Los Angeles and trying to make it as a writer. Or at least he's pretending to try and make it as a writer. John has two friends, a roommate and a perfect head of hair like The Wolfman from that Warren Zevon song. John and his friends work crappy temp jobs while they wait for success to fall into their laps. The plot of the film, such as it is, revolves around John meeting a woman who has to make her life into a series of little dramas and him getting a new roommate who's more desperate to be liked than a dog at the pound one day from getting put to sleep. John also wears a suit and walks around a lot. That's pretty much the whole movie. I know that seems like I'm leaving something out.

I'm not.

This film isn't classically bad. You can usually enjoy making fun of a bad film. The Low Life is a void, like someone took an eraser and rubbed out everything interesting in life. Rory Cochrane as John is about a responsive as a deaf-mute on tranquilizers. He ambles from scene to scene like he's in a daze. John never really does anything. He never really says anything. In fact, every other character in the movie has more personality than John, clichéd as those personalities may be. His friend Chad (Ron Livingston) is a resentful rich man's son who looks and sounds like he was purchased at Stereotypes R' Us. His other friend Leonard (Christian J. Meoli) is a spastic loser who exists in the script to provide exposition and serve the Almighty Plot Hammer. Kyra Sedgwick plays the contrivedly colorful woman who drifts into John's life and finds him appealing for no discernible reason. Sean Astin is the needy roommate and gives a performance straight out of an Afterschool Special about the kid nobody likes who winds up killing himself and/or blowing up the school.

If you put a knife to my throat and made me guess, I'd say this movie is meant to be some sort of coming-of-age tale about being young and poor in LA. The problem is that John and his friends are all lazy, pretentious bastards. They constantly whine about how hard it is to get ahead, yet none of them would know an honest day's work if it kicked them in the crotch. Sedgwick and Astin's characters are potentially more appealing, but they never rise above arbitrarily dysfunctional objects which the emptiness that is John has to deal with.

The only marginally appealing thing about this movie is that it makes you realize the Ron Livingston has been mimicking Rory Cochrane for much of his career. I'd swear that Livingston has been stealing bits and pieces of Cochrane's alienated slacker acting job here for a great many of his future films, including Office Space. But even the sense of deja vu that gives you when watching The Low Life isn't enough to make it worthwhile.

This is a story of unsympathetic people who do nothing but get more unsympathetic as you watch them. Renting this movie might be a cheap cure for insomnia, but I think you'd be better off with warm milk or drugs.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This film is an experience.
Jeanna19 February 1999
The Low Life is my favorite movie. This film left me feeling numb, that's when I know if something was good or not. Rory Cochrane gives an amazing performance, which he always does, as the aspiring writer, John Martin. Sean Astin, Ron Livingston, Christian Meoli, Kyra Sedgewick and others also take roles as interesting characters in this well written work of genius. Again I say that this movie is an experience, and to understand this experience you need to see this film. It's so good, I don't want to spoil it for you, so go see for yourself.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant.
andelfe26 February 1999
This is one of my all-time favorite movies. Rory Cochrane (one of my all-time favorite actors) and Sean Astin are wonderful. Much like George Hickenlooper's original short film of "Sling Blade," this movie is filled with long emotional pauses and is comprised much more of contemplation than action. Many might find it slow or boring because of this, but I give it a very enthusiastic ten because if you are patient and intelligent enough to sit through the entire thing, you can see the true beauty of it. Touching and emotional with funny moments, too.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Funny, offbeat and believable indie film
bigbadblair10 August 2007
I found The Low Life to be quite a funny film. It's about that period in life around your early 20s where you have to make that transition from student to career mode. If you have ever moved from a small city or town to a big city for a career or personal goal then you should watch this film because you should be able to relate to it. I really don't feel that this is a depressing film, I think there are quite a lot of really funny, unexpected yet believable scenes to help balance it out. This film is actually quite realistic and I would not be surprised if all of the characters were based on real people known to the writers. I am quite surprised at the overall rating of 5.5 out of ten, I would totally disregard this if you had the opportunity to see the Low Life because you will definitely be going on an exotic trip of a film experience.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well worth watching
purehalo26 March 2003
I highly recommend you see this film. The story revolves around one mans struggle to be unaffected by those around him no matter how much they care or try to help . The characters are very well rounded and all serve a purpose (we'll have no throw away characters here thankyou!) The acting is suburb and Rory Cochrane delivers , as usual , a well rounded performance perfectly capturing the stoic struggle with subtlety and intelligence. Sean Astin is at his nerdy best with strong support by Ron Livingston .

Well worth a look.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of my faves.
jadecow20 July 1999
okays, it's a great movie. People will trash it, but I feel bad for them more then be angry with them. You really have to think about this movie, and if you do, it's worth the hour and a half or so that it takes. Yeah, it's not fast, there's hardly any violence, but that's what makes it better. Yeah, it may be depressing, but isn't life depressing too?

I originally watched it b/c I'm a huge Rory Cochrane fan, but now I'm glad beyond words that I watched it. I thought Rory Cochrane did a great job of portraying John, as did the rest of the actors with their characters.

oh yeah fave. lines: John: How does a single crappy novel by some Jackie Collins type outsell all the books written by Hemingway, Faulkner, salinger...combined?

John: It was more of a controlled mental breakdown. It was okay. Everybody should have one.

I gave it a 10.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of those rare movies...
troia15 June 2003
that takes you in completely. I can't help but noticing that many people praise Sean Astin. I agree, he is wonderful in that role. He makes the audience feel with him. But still I think this is definetely Rory Cochrane's Movies. His performance is so incredibly good, that I saw that movie three times in a row. There never was any doubt that Mr. Cochrane is a very, very talented Actor, but he just shine's out in "the low life". Yes, the movie is somewhat depressing, but it's Cochrane's play to thank for, that the viewer can still enjoy the whole movie. I really can't believe that I just recently saw it for the first time. To bad there might never be a DVD, finally a movie worth buying. bibi Germany
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Depressing but enjoyable
xrak8312 April 2001
I saw this film a couple of years ago (at least i think it was this film because i pieced it together from old Sean Astin movies and the basic plot for this movie)and liked it. It is rather depressing so you should no whether that will bring down your opinion of the film before you watch it. The story is mediocre and you might dislike the ending but it fits in with the mood of the movie. The characters are interesting which is important considering the plot revolves around the protagonist and the people around him. If you see this film while your in the right mood you'll probably like it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining ...
ejm5421 July 1999
The characters don't interact with each other very well, but separately they are very interesting. I especially liked Sean Astin's Andrew, a lonely twenty-something with a penchant for 80s power ballads. James LeGros is up to his usual standards as Michael Schroeder, Jr., the landlord who sends his temps to do everything from plumbing to evictions.

I usually like Rory Cochrane, but either his character wasn't written all that well (probably the case) or he didn't do it very well. At the end you're more interested in Andrew's fate than anyone else's.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed