35 out of 39 people found the following comment useful :- So bad it's bad, 4 diciembre 2005
Author:
kylopod (kylopod@aol.com) de Baltimore, MD
When this film showed up on the cable listing, I had a sudden urge to
see it even though I knew it was probably going to be terrible. The
original was such a staple of my childhood, yet had such an incomplete
ending, that I was intensely curious to see what they would do with
another sequel. Besides, I knew that it could not possibly be worse
than "The NeverEnding Story II."
Boy, was I wrong.
"The NeverEnding Story III" has rightly earned its place among IMDb
voters as the 79th worst movie of all time. It is so bad that, in
writing this review, I risk making it sound like it's worth watching,
sort of like "Plan Nine from Outer Space." I assure you, this film is
in no way in the Ed Wood category of being so incompetently done that
it becomes enjoyable to watch. Those moviegoers who take pleasure in
seeing cinematic disasters should be forewarned about this one, lest
they never again be able to erase from their memory Rockbiter's
gravelly-voiced version of "Born to be Wild," played in a video
sequence early in the film and again during the end credits.
No, I am not joking.
The second film does have its admirers, and as much as I hated it, I
sort of understand where they're coming from. At least that film had a
legitimate purpose, to tell the second half of the novel which the
first film had neglected to do. But now the story is finished, so the
third film has to make up its own reason for being, with an even
shabbier budget than that of the second film. So it concocts a story
that allows us to see as little of Fantasia as possible. Here, a series
of magical mishaps causes a bunch of creatures from Fantasia to be
transported into the real world. These include Falkor the luck dragon,
a baby rockbiter about the size of a fountain statue, and a talking
tree. (Falkor, who must have gotten a lobotomy sometime between the
second and third film, will chase after a "dragon" at a Chinese
festival.) What we do see of Fantasia makes the place seem a lot
smaller than I had ever imagined. Almost all of the scenes there take
place in the empress's chamber in the Ivory Tower, though there is also
one sequence where we get to see Rockbiter's home (just what I've
always wanted to do!) with Mama Rockbiter and of course the previously
mentioned Baby Rockbiter sitting in front of a large stone TV set.
Needless to say, the inhabitants of Fantasia seem to possess quite a
bit more knowledge of Earth than they did in the first film. When the
gnome describes Bastian as "not exactly Arnold Schwarzenegger in the
muscle department," we're reminded how much more enjoyable the film
would probably be if Schwarzenegger were actually in it.
The cause of these events is that a gang of school bullies steals the
book and discovers that it gives them the power to wreak havoc on the
inhabitants of Fantasia. Strangely, these modern kids never seem
surprised that magic exists. Think how long it took in the first film
for even imaginative, ten-year-old Bastian to become convinced of the
book's supernatural qualities. These bullies, much older and more
concrete, never go through such a skeptical period. And later, when the
Auryn falls into the hands of a teenage girl, she treats it with about
the same level of awe as if she got hold of her parents' credit card.
There are actually some familiar actors in this mess. Mr. Koreander is
played by the British character actor Freddie Jones, Bastian is played
by the kid from "Free Willy," and the main bully is played by a
relatively young Jack Black, who now probably would like to do with
this film what George Lucas wants to do with the "Star Wars Holiday
Special."
33 out of 38 people found the following comment useful :- An insult to the series, 7 marzo 1999
Author:
Wizard-8 de Victoria, BC
The first movie was great. The second wasn't so great, though it's not quite
as bad as you've heard. Especially with there now being an even WORSE entry
to this series - this being it!
Someone questioned why Warner Bros. didn't have the distribution rights to
this entry. Well, at first they did. I remember reading a (very negative)
review of this movie in "Variety" magazine, and Warner Bros. was set to
distribute. It's quite obvious now that Warner Bros. threw away its
distribution option (probably after seeing how horrible this movie is), and
Miramax picked it up for a tiny release that lasted 5 minutes. (In my city,
it only played for a few weekend matinees).
Oh yeah, what did I think of this movie? Quite frankly, it sucked. What were
they thinking when they decided to jazz up the movie with contemporary rock
'n roll???? And most of the movie actually takes place not in the fantasy
world, but in this world. The characters are especially obnoxious
(especially the rock baby), and suffer from stereotypes. Plus, the movie
seems to have forgotten a lot of what happened previously - the hero's dad
knew about Fantasia, so the hero didn't have to hide anything from him - but
for some reason, the hero keeps the incidents he was involved in a secret.
The low point comes where the climax is not solved with magic or
intelligence - but with karate. Yes, karate.
27 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :- do not ever watch this horrible film, 10 julio 2005
Author:
EmpressEmily de Canada
In the beginning, there was The Neverending Story. It is the best film
ever made.
Then, there was The Neverending Story II. I'll vent my spleen over that
mess later.
And then, there came this waste of film and effort. Hold on a minute
while I go throw up.
While it is a clean, safe film in terms of subject matter, the third
NES should never have been made. And I mean NEVER. The first two movies
covered all the wondrous things within the original book, so I don't
understand why this film was made at all. It is just cheesy, stupid,
abysmal, and an absolute disgrace to the idea of The Neverending Story.
First of all, what's going on with this stepsister of Bastian's that
has somehow appeared? Wrong, wrong. . . Then, what happened to good old
Falkor? And most of all, where is Atreyu? If you are bold enough to see
this film, that is the one thing you will distinctly notice if you've
seen the other two- no Atreyu.The boy who played Bastian was not nearly
as obnoxious as the actor from the second film, but he just doesn't
hold a candle to the original actor, Barret Oliver.
I have only seen this movie once, because I was informed of how awful
it was, and just had to see for myself. It was a waste of my precious
time. I hardly remember the plot line or anything important like that
because it just didn't stick with me. One gets the impression that this
was made as a sort of kid/family-friendly approach to The Neverending
Story, because it is just so simplistic, and sacrifices the charm of
the original characters and settings for the sake of being funny and
entertaining. But trust me, it is NOT funny and it is NOT entertaining.
Any NES fan worth their salt would be appalled by this film. If however
you are not familiar with the Neverending Story, see the original 1984
movie and read the book and be contented with that.
Do not subject yourself to the torturous nightmare that is the
Neverending Story 3, I implore you.
As for a star rating out of ten, I give this film nothing. Nil. Zip.
Nichts.
21 out of 24 people found the following comment useful :- Why?, 2 enero 2005
Author:
iriegirl de Tampa ,Florida
I don't understand why they bothered to make this one. The first
Neverending Story really put you in the feeling of a fantasy world. The
second was not quite as good. This one? Good Lord! Super trendy, with
people in Fantasia watching MTV type television. Falcor wasn't the same
voice or personality. It always ruins a good children's movie that is
attempting to take you to "another world" when they try to make it hip.
The beauty of these films was that they weren't "hip"; they were a true
departure from the everyday. Isn't that what going into the book in the
first place was supposed to represent? When will film makers learn to
leave well enough alone?
14 out of 16 people found the following comment useful :- In A Class By Itself, 4 junio 2005
Author:
KingAtor42 de United States
This movie does belong in a class by itself: Even worse than utterly
terrible. I have been an aficionado of 'bad' movies for quite a long
time, adoring those movies which only a group of friends and many
drinks makes enjoyable. This movie was in fact so amazingly bad that I
could not watch it past the first half hour or so. I only watched the
rest via fast-forward the next morning. I've seen many films worse
considered classically bad, this one beat them all hands down. I even
had to start referring to possibly similar bad movies by saying "They
may be in the NS3 category". There are those bad movies that are MST3K
fun and then there are those that make you wish you had a sharp object
to commit suicide with, this one is the latter.
This franchise went from excellent original fantasy, special effects
for the genre, and well written characters to bad acting and writing in
part 2, to movie of the week actors and rubber puppets in part 3. It's
amazing how a film franchise that had such good promise sank faster
than Lips Manless after taking "the bath". Especially if you're
considering getting this for the kids, at least treat them to the
original movie or something like the Peter Barnes inspired fantasy
miniseries' from the late 90s.
18 out of 24 people found the following comment useful :- Did the producers even pay attention to basic points?, 4 diciembre 2003
Author:
heichers de Murfreesboro, TN
I thought Bastian's real mom died? Now his real mom is alive and his dad
(except his new stepdad) is gone. Did I miss a step between NES 2 and 3?
Then, all the fantasy characters (Falcor, Rock Biter, etc.) change looks
(and in some cases, even names)!
If I could rate this negative #'s, I'd rate this a -10. However, Jack
Black
showed how he could actually act (in a rather early appearance before he
became the likable guy he is/plays now), so I think I'll give it a
-5.
12 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :- Simply Put? Bad., 11 febrero 2004
Author:
Sparrow_in_flight de United States
Sadly, the running joke of Engywook and Urgl having to go to the bathroom,
but being unable to do so, is one of the entertaining things about this
film. But it does get tiresome. And the baby rock-biter is cute, if
incredibly stupid. But if you have ever seen the first movie, or read the
book, you will most likely not care for this movie at all. The plot is poor,
Falcore looks extremely cartoonish as do the Rockbiters, and the
Nasties...well, they just aren't that scary. Give me Gmork any day,
please!
This is a tolerable children's movie ONLY if you have no other knowledge of
The Neverending Story.
21 out of 31 people found the following comment useful :- Poor, Poor Neverending story, 23 agosto 2004
Author:
tally (ladybug37211@yahoo.com) de Nashville,tn
We have seen all the NES movies. The 1st was the absolute best!!!!! The
second was sub-par. The third was the worst of them all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Good News: Jack Black Played his character very well. Bad News: Where
do we begin? First of all No atreau- Why, we don't know. second, the
empress had BLOND hair. Defenatly not the beautiful girl in the first
NES.She also looked very stoned. Bastion was an innocent kid with a big
imagination. This one looked clueless. Changing his dead mother to his
dead father is the worse, most noticeably fault with the story. YOU DO
NOT CHANGE THE THE ORIGINAL POINTS OF THE FRANCHISE!!!! Now the
fantasia characters. Falcor looked like an anorexic, crack head who
must of lost all his knowledge with the pipe. We loved the rock-biter
in the first film. But in this he shrunk and had a family (yes we know
his son was in the second). If everyone grew up, why didn't didn't the
baby? The elves looked horrible. It was good they brought them back,
but they ruined the concept of them both. The oracle looked nothing
like the first film and neither did the ivory tower.(stone?) They
shouldn't started from scratch. The idea of using the real world as a
premise was good, but the storyline sucked bad. Only Falcor new what
the real world looked like. To try to make us believe that the other
fantasia characters knew was laughable to say the least.
Over all they should burn all copies of this movie and use a memory
wipe to make us forget this movie ever existed. If we rated this on a
scale of 1-10 we would give this a -1000.
6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :- NES III is a movie I really want to like..., 3 marzo 2006
Author:
Vooshvazool de United States
I first saw the first movie a few years ago. I loved it and still love
it. I saw the second movie a while later. It was okay then. After two
or three viewings I saw Michael Ende's name in the opening credits, and
decided to find the book and read it. I can't remember whether I saw
NES III before or after I read the book.
The book was AMAZING. Probably the best stand-alone novel I have ever
read. But the problem is: After you read the book, the movies always
look worse because it's not like the book. The first movie is basically
based on the first half of the book. A few things were changed and/or
left out, but it's still a great movie overall.
The second movie is basically based on the second half of the book. A
lot of things were changed and a lot of things were left out. This
decreased NES II's score a lot, but it's still barely an okay movie.
Now NES III is based only on the characters of the book. There's
Bastian, of course, but in the book and the previous two movies, he
doesn't have the attitude anyhow close to getting wild hair. No Atreyu,
of course, which was probably one of the worst decisions made in the
making of the movie. According to the first movie, Mr. Koreander
doesn't like kids. But now he's school librarian, which doesn't make
sense. Engywook and Urgl returning was probably a good decision, but
their characterization was ruined when they were reduced to complaining
about having to go to the bathroom the whole second half of the movie.
The Bark Troll (there were bark trolls in the book) is not supposed to
know enough about the human world to mention Vegas and Arnold
Schwarzenegger. Bastian should not have been allowed to keep Junior at
his house. Either Bastian would have said, "No way! I'm not taking him
to my house!" or Junior would have wrecked his house down. Even the
Childlike Empress was reduced to an idiot towards the end of the movie.
NES III just doesn't have the feel that The Neverending Story was
originally designed to have.
Positive notes on NES III: Well, the story was actually okay in my
opinion. Jack Black is a likable actor. Mr. Koreander's line: "The
story's not over yet, young man" is the only time in any of the three
movies where it talks about the NeverEnding Story's "unendingness." I
like seeing the Old Man of Wandering Mountain, but it's not the same
part as the book. And the biggest positive note: I liked it a lot
better a few years ago, when I wasn't as much of a movie critic as I am
now.
5/10
8 out of 11 people found the following comment useful :- THE worst film. Ever. (Small SPOILERS.), 31 agosto 2004
Author:
DesertHedgehog de USA
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Rarely do I see a film that I can honestly say I absolutely do NOT
like. This film, bar none, is THE WORST.
Character rape abounds. Falkor, the wise, soft-spoken luck dragon we
know and love, is transformed into a whiney, neurotic character who
frequently makes lame complaints, a few concerning his back. Yeccchhh.
Then, there's the tree-like character. HIS wisecracks are often related
to the human world. ("Call the fire department!") If there's one thing
I despise, it's modern-Earth humor where it doesn't belong.
And the Child-like Empress. This lovely, polite, wise young lady has
been mysteriously transformed into the Pre-Teen Empress. At one point,
she even referred to someone as "old man." Can you imagine our beloved
Stronach-version Empress doing that? Never!
The ONLY characters who had anything done right with them were the
gnomes. These were actually played fairly well.
The story was horrendous. It didn't even feel like a Neverending Story
movie at all. It didn't help that most of it took place in the "human
world."
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosreparto y equipo completostrivialidadesofficial sitesfrases célebresOverview
información principalinformación combinadareparto y equipo completoscréditos de compañíastv schedulePremios y críticas
comentarios de los usuarioscríticas externascríticas de grupos de usuariosawardsCalificacionesparents guiderecomendacionesmessage boardArgumento y citas
argumentoplot synopsispalabras clave del argumentosinopsis Amazon.comfrases célebresCosas divertidas
trivialidadespifiastemas musicalescréditos extravagantesotras versionesenlaces entre películaspreguntas frecuentesOtro tipo de información
enlaces a productosbox office/businessfechas de estrenolugares de rodajeespecificaciones técnicasLaserdiscDVDlecturas relacionadasnews articlesMaterial promocional
frases comercialestrailers and videoscarteles y enlacesphoto galleryEnlaces externos
enlaces a cinesofficial sitesmisceláneosfotografíassound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
The Neverending Story III (1994)
35 out of 39 people found the following comment useful :-

So bad it's bad, 4 diciembre 2005
Author: kylopod (kylopod@aol.com) de Baltimore, MD
When this film showed up on the cable listing, I had a sudden urge to see it even though I knew it was probably going to be terrible. The original was such a staple of my childhood, yet had such an incomplete ending, that I was intensely curious to see what they would do with another sequel. Besides, I knew that it could not possibly be worse than "The NeverEnding Story II."
Boy, was I wrong.
"The NeverEnding Story III" has rightly earned its place among IMDb voters as the 79th worst movie of all time. It is so bad that, in writing this review, I risk making it sound like it's worth watching, sort of like "Plan Nine from Outer Space." I assure you, this film is in no way in the Ed Wood category of being so incompetently done that it becomes enjoyable to watch. Those moviegoers who take pleasure in seeing cinematic disasters should be forewarned about this one, lest they never again be able to erase from their memory Rockbiter's gravelly-voiced version of "Born to be Wild," played in a video sequence early in the film and again during the end credits.
No, I am not joking.
The second film does have its admirers, and as much as I hated it, I sort of understand where they're coming from. At least that film had a legitimate purpose, to tell the second half of the novel which the first film had neglected to do. But now the story is finished, so the third film has to make up its own reason for being, with an even shabbier budget than that of the second film. So it concocts a story that allows us to see as little of Fantasia as possible. Here, a series of magical mishaps causes a bunch of creatures from Fantasia to be transported into the real world. These include Falkor the luck dragon, a baby rockbiter about the size of a fountain statue, and a talking tree. (Falkor, who must have gotten a lobotomy sometime between the second and third film, will chase after a "dragon" at a Chinese festival.) What we do see of Fantasia makes the place seem a lot smaller than I had ever imagined. Almost all of the scenes there take place in the empress's chamber in the Ivory Tower, though there is also one sequence where we get to see Rockbiter's home (just what I've always wanted to do!) with Mama Rockbiter and of course the previously mentioned Baby Rockbiter sitting in front of a large stone TV set. Needless to say, the inhabitants of Fantasia seem to possess quite a bit more knowledge of Earth than they did in the first film. When the gnome describes Bastian as "not exactly Arnold Schwarzenegger in the muscle department," we're reminded how much more enjoyable the film would probably be if Schwarzenegger were actually in it.
The cause of these events is that a gang of school bullies steals the book and discovers that it gives them the power to wreak havoc on the inhabitants of Fantasia. Strangely, these modern kids never seem surprised that magic exists. Think how long it took in the first film for even imaginative, ten-year-old Bastian to become convinced of the book's supernatural qualities. These bullies, much older and more concrete, never go through such a skeptical period. And later, when the Auryn falls into the hands of a teenage girl, she treats it with about the same level of awe as if she got hold of her parents' credit card.
There are actually some familiar actors in this mess. Mr. Koreander is played by the British character actor Freddie Jones, Bastian is played by the kid from "Free Willy," and the main bully is played by a relatively young Jack Black, who now probably would like to do with this film what George Lucas wants to do with the "Star Wars Holiday Special."
33 out of 38 people found the following comment useful :-
An insult to the series, 7 marzo 1999
Author: Wizard-8 de Victoria, BC
The first movie was great. The second wasn't so great, though it's not quite as bad as you've heard. Especially with there now being an even WORSE entry to this series - this being it!
Someone questioned why Warner Bros. didn't have the distribution rights to this entry. Well, at first they did. I remember reading a (very negative) review of this movie in "Variety" magazine, and Warner Bros. was set to distribute. It's quite obvious now that Warner Bros. threw away its distribution option (probably after seeing how horrible this movie is), and Miramax picked it up for a tiny release that lasted 5 minutes. (In my city, it only played for a few weekend matinees).
Oh yeah, what did I think of this movie? Quite frankly, it sucked. What were they thinking when they decided to jazz up the movie with contemporary rock 'n roll???? And most of the movie actually takes place not in the fantasy world, but in this world. The characters are especially obnoxious (especially the rock baby), and suffer from stereotypes. Plus, the movie seems to have forgotten a lot of what happened previously - the hero's dad knew about Fantasia, so the hero didn't have to hide anything from him - but for some reason, the hero keeps the incidents he was involved in a secret. The low point comes where the climax is not solved with magic or intelligence - but with karate. Yes, karate.
27 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :-

do not ever watch this horrible film, 10 julio 2005
Author: EmpressEmily de Canada
In the beginning, there was The Neverending Story. It is the best film ever made.
Then, there was The Neverending Story II. I'll vent my spleen over that mess later.
And then, there came this waste of film and effort. Hold on a minute while I go throw up.
While it is a clean, safe film in terms of subject matter, the third NES should never have been made. And I mean NEVER. The first two movies covered all the wondrous things within the original book, so I don't understand why this film was made at all. It is just cheesy, stupid, abysmal, and an absolute disgrace to the idea of The Neverending Story.
First of all, what's going on with this stepsister of Bastian's that has somehow appeared? Wrong, wrong. . . Then, what happened to good old Falkor? And most of all, where is Atreyu? If you are bold enough to see this film, that is the one thing you will distinctly notice if you've seen the other two- no Atreyu.The boy who played Bastian was not nearly as obnoxious as the actor from the second film, but he just doesn't hold a candle to the original actor, Barret Oliver.
I have only seen this movie once, because I was informed of how awful it was, and just had to see for myself. It was a waste of my precious time. I hardly remember the plot line or anything important like that because it just didn't stick with me. One gets the impression that this was made as a sort of kid/family-friendly approach to The Neverending Story, because it is just so simplistic, and sacrifices the charm of the original characters and settings for the sake of being funny and entertaining. But trust me, it is NOT funny and it is NOT entertaining. Any NES fan worth their salt would be appalled by this film. If however you are not familiar with the Neverending Story, see the original 1984 movie and read the book and be contented with that.
Do not subject yourself to the torturous nightmare that is the Neverending Story 3, I implore you.
As for a star rating out of ten, I give this film nothing. Nil. Zip. Nichts.
21 out of 24 people found the following comment useful :-

Why?, 2 enero 2005
Author: iriegirl de Tampa ,Florida
I don't understand why they bothered to make this one. The first Neverending Story really put you in the feeling of a fantasy world. The second was not quite as good. This one? Good Lord! Super trendy, with people in Fantasia watching MTV type television. Falcor wasn't the same voice or personality. It always ruins a good children's movie that is attempting to take you to "another world" when they try to make it hip. The beauty of these films was that they weren't "hip"; they were a true departure from the everyday. Isn't that what going into the book in the first place was supposed to represent? When will film makers learn to leave well enough alone?
14 out of 16 people found the following comment useful :-

In A Class By Itself, 4 junio 2005
Author: KingAtor42 de United States
This movie does belong in a class by itself: Even worse than utterly terrible. I have been an aficionado of 'bad' movies for quite a long time, adoring those movies which only a group of friends and many drinks makes enjoyable. This movie was in fact so amazingly bad that I could not watch it past the first half hour or so. I only watched the rest via fast-forward the next morning. I've seen many films worse considered classically bad, this one beat them all hands down. I even had to start referring to possibly similar bad movies by saying "They may be in the NS3 category". There are those bad movies that are MST3K fun and then there are those that make you wish you had a sharp object to commit suicide with, this one is the latter.
This franchise went from excellent original fantasy, special effects for the genre, and well written characters to bad acting and writing in part 2, to movie of the week actors and rubber puppets in part 3. It's amazing how a film franchise that had such good promise sank faster than Lips Manless after taking "the bath". Especially if you're considering getting this for the kids, at least treat them to the original movie or something like the Peter Barnes inspired fantasy miniseries' from the late 90s.
18 out of 24 people found the following comment useful :-

Did the producers even pay attention to basic points?, 4 diciembre 2003
Author: heichers de Murfreesboro, TN
I thought Bastian's real mom died? Now his real mom is alive and his dad (except his new stepdad) is gone. Did I miss a step between NES 2 and 3? Then, all the fantasy characters (Falcor, Rock Biter, etc.) change looks (and in some cases, even names)!
If I could rate this negative #'s, I'd rate this a -10. However, Jack Black showed how he could actually act (in a rather early appearance before he became the likable guy he is/plays now), so I think I'll give it a -5.
12 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :-

Simply Put? Bad., 11 febrero 2004
Author: Sparrow_in_flight de United States
Sadly, the running joke of Engywook and Urgl having to go to the bathroom, but being unable to do so, is one of the entertaining things about this film. But it does get tiresome. And the baby rock-biter is cute, if incredibly stupid. But if you have ever seen the first movie, or read the book, you will most likely not care for this movie at all. The plot is poor, Falcore looks extremely cartoonish as do the Rockbiters, and the Nasties...well, they just aren't that scary. Give me Gmork any day, please!
This is a tolerable children's movie ONLY if you have no other knowledge of The Neverending Story.
21 out of 31 people found the following comment useful :-
Poor, Poor Neverending story, 23 agosto 2004
Author: tally (ladybug37211@yahoo.com) de Nashville,tn
We have seen all the NES movies. The 1st was the absolute best!!!!! The second was sub-par. The third was the worst of them all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Good News: Jack Black Played his character very well. Bad News: Where do we begin? First of all No atreau- Why, we don't know. second, the empress had BLOND hair. Defenatly not the beautiful girl in the first NES.She also looked very stoned. Bastion was an innocent kid with a big imagination. This one looked clueless. Changing his dead mother to his dead father is the worse, most noticeably fault with the story. YOU DO NOT CHANGE THE THE ORIGINAL POINTS OF THE FRANCHISE!!!! Now the fantasia characters. Falcor looked like an anorexic, crack head who must of lost all his knowledge with the pipe. We loved the rock-biter in the first film. But in this he shrunk and had a family (yes we know his son was in the second). If everyone grew up, why didn't didn't the baby? The elves looked horrible. It was good they brought them back, but they ruined the concept of them both. The oracle looked nothing like the first film and neither did the ivory tower.(stone?) They shouldn't started from scratch. The idea of using the real world as a premise was good, but the storyline sucked bad. Only Falcor new what the real world looked like. To try to make us believe that the other fantasia characters knew was laughable to say the least.
Over all they should burn all copies of this movie and use a memory wipe to make us forget this movie ever existed. If we rated this on a scale of 1-10 we would give this a -1000.
6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :-

NES III is a movie I really want to like..., 3 marzo 2006
Author: Vooshvazool de United States
I first saw the first movie a few years ago. I loved it and still love it. I saw the second movie a while later. It was okay then. After two or three viewings I saw Michael Ende's name in the opening credits, and decided to find the book and read it. I can't remember whether I saw NES III before or after I read the book.
The book was AMAZING. Probably the best stand-alone novel I have ever read. But the problem is: After you read the book, the movies always look worse because it's not like the book. The first movie is basically based on the first half of the book. A few things were changed and/or left out, but it's still a great movie overall.
The second movie is basically based on the second half of the book. A lot of things were changed and a lot of things were left out. This decreased NES II's score a lot, but it's still barely an okay movie.
Now NES III is based only on the characters of the book. There's Bastian, of course, but in the book and the previous two movies, he doesn't have the attitude anyhow close to getting wild hair. No Atreyu, of course, which was probably one of the worst decisions made in the making of the movie. According to the first movie, Mr. Koreander doesn't like kids. But now he's school librarian, which doesn't make sense. Engywook and Urgl returning was probably a good decision, but their characterization was ruined when they were reduced to complaining about having to go to the bathroom the whole second half of the movie. The Bark Troll (there were bark trolls in the book) is not supposed to know enough about the human world to mention Vegas and Arnold Schwarzenegger. Bastian should not have been allowed to keep Junior at his house. Either Bastian would have said, "No way! I'm not taking him to my house!" or Junior would have wrecked his house down. Even the Childlike Empress was reduced to an idiot towards the end of the movie. NES III just doesn't have the feel that The Neverending Story was originally designed to have.
Positive notes on NES III: Well, the story was actually okay in my opinion. Jack Black is a likable actor. Mr. Koreander's line: "The story's not over yet, young man" is the only time in any of the three movies where it talks about the NeverEnding Story's "unendingness." I like seeing the Old Man of Wandering Mountain, but it's not the same part as the book. And the biggest positive note: I liked it a lot better a few years ago, when I wasn't as much of a movie critic as I am now.
5/10
8 out of 11 people found the following comment useful :-
THE worst film. Ever. (Small SPOILERS.), 31 agosto 2004
Author: DesertHedgehog de USA
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Rarely do I see a film that I can honestly say I absolutely do NOT like. This film, bar none, is THE WORST.
Character rape abounds. Falkor, the wise, soft-spoken luck dragon we know and love, is transformed into a whiney, neurotic character who frequently makes lame complaints, a few concerning his back. Yeccchhh.
Then, there's the tree-like character. HIS wisecracks are often related to the human world. ("Call the fire department!") If there's one thing I despise, it's modern-Earth humor where it doesn't belong.
And the Child-like Empress. This lovely, polite, wise young lady has been mysteriously transformed into the Pre-Teen Empress. At one point, she even referred to someone as "old man." Can you imagine our beloved Stronach-version Empress doing that? Never!
The ONLY characters who had anything done right with them were the gnomes. These were actually played fairly well.
The story was horrendous. It didn't even feel like a Neverending Story movie at all. It didn't help that most of it took place in the "human world."
My rating? I big, fat, flat zero. >_<
Add another comment
Related Links