Fallen (1998) Poster

(1998)

User Reviews

Review this title
319 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Detective & Demon In Deadly Dual
seymourblack-118 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Shortly after thinking that he'd brought an end to a series of murders, a homicide detective starts to realise that the perpetrator is still at large and is also someone who couldn't possibly be arrested or brought to justice by conventional methods. The way in which his investigation leads him to these findings and the formulation of a highly unconventional plan to end the killings, provides "Fallen" with its extremely offbeat plot. This well-written story begins very colourfully in a way that raises a lot of questions and then proceeds through the investigation stage before reaching it brilliantly twisted conclusion.

Having been responsible for capturing serial killer Edgar Reese (Elias Koteas), Detective John Hobbes (Denzel Washington) visits him on death row immediately prior to his execution. Reese's behaviour at this time is rather strange as he thrusts his hand out strongly to shake hands with Hobbes and sets him a riddle to solve. He then talks loudly in ancient Syrian Aramaic and later, in the gas chamber, loudly sings "Time Is On My Side" until he can't anymore.

A little while later, Hobbes has to investigate a further series of murders which are carried out in the same style as those committed by Reese and a clue he finds at one of the crime scenes leads him to research the case of a well-respected detective from his department who, 30 years earlier, had committed suicide at a remote woodland cabin after being accused of crimes he didn't commit. Hobbes' research leads him to the detective's daughter, Gretta Milano (Embeth Davidtz) who's a theology professor. She's initially very reluctant to talk but confirms that her father took his own life because of incriminating evidence against him which he felt he wouldn't be able to disprove.

When Hobbes visits the cabin where Milano had killed himself, he finds the name "Azazel" written on one of the walls and Gretta later confirms that it refers to a fallen angel who, after being cast out of heaven, had been made formless as a punishment and could only continue to exist in the bodies of others. The demon's ability to pass from body to body simply by touch made it extremely dangerous and impossible to stop. Hobbes begins to realise that he's actually in a dual against a very formidable adversary who's determined to destroy him and so, when evidence starts to appear which implicates Hobbes in the murders he's investigating, he knows that he's rapidly being put in the same situation that detective Milano had been in and so devises a scheme to outwit the demon and bring a permanent end to the havoc he wreaks.

Denzel Washington is very natural and believable as the decent detective who has never taken a bribe in his career and believes that cops are "the chosen people". This extremely rational man remains typically methodical and professional as he pursues what turns out to be a supernatural serial killer and is confident that his approach will eventually enable him to put a stop to the demon's killing spree. John Goodman, James Gandolfini and Donald Sutherland all do well as Hobbes' police colleagues and Elias Koteas makes a powerful impression in his role which gives him tremendous scope to display his abilities.

Thrillers which include the type of subject matter featured in "Fallen" often resort to sensationalism, gratuitous violence and endings that use some previously unknown piece of information to bring matters to a close. The fact that "Fallen" avoids all these pitfalls is very much to its credit, especially as its brilliantly twisted conclusion follows on perfectly from all that preceded it and puts an entirely different perspective on what appeared to happen in the movie's opening scenes.
26 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fallen Up
hengir16 November 2005
Came across this film in a video store sale bin at a giveaway price and bought it on the strength of the cast, Denzil Washington, John Goodman, Donald Sutherland and Embeth Davidtz. Found it to be surprisingly good. Not a horror film as such, no gore or unconvincing CGI effects but a gripping story with supernatural elements. There are subtle shivers, particularly the 'touching' scenes and the sense of something evil hidden behind the everyday. The setting is bleakly autumnal and it is finishes with a nice twist. If you watch the film again knowing the ending it makes more sense.

Of the acting, Goodman and Sutherland don't have much to play with but it is always good to see them in a film. Washington is very good as his normal cop character grapples with the mystery and Davidtz is excellent as the academic, scared and solitary and fallible. The scenes between Washington and Davidtz are well played. Tan Dun's music adds to the atmosphere. Well directed and well written. Well done.
24 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A supernatural thriller with a great story!
Boba_Fett113829 January 2005
The great cast already hints at it, "Fallen" is a great movie.

Best way to watch this movie is to not know too much about it. Just pick up the movie and let it surprise you. It's like "Identity", the less you know about it, the better.

Director Gregory Hoblit is a great and underrated director. He knows how to get the maximum out of everything. He also directed the movies "Primal Fear" and "Frequency" and much acclaimed television series episodes for "Hill Street Blues", "L.A. Law" and "NYPD Blue".

Really great about the movie is the story by Nicholas Kazan (yes, indeed the son of...). It's supernatural but it still knows how to remain believable and realistic. The viewer never knows what he is going to get and what will happen next. This is why it is best not to know too much about this movie's story before viewing it for the first time. All of the story its surprises will work better this way.

A bit of an forgotten underrated movie.

8/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
80 out of 109 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Poor lost souls
nik_trajkovski3 June 2002
I have been reading with interest the comments made by others users of this film. So first, let me say that I loved the film. Interesting, well paced, excellent choice of music. The movie is unique, with a magnificent twist that almost annoys you (but I won't say anymore).

Second, some of the users making comments seemed to have missed the plot. Those people who are saying it doesn't have enough action clearly have a limited appreciation for film genres. Stick to your fast paced action movies, and don't bother writing your limited opinions about other movies genres. You don't have the mental capacity to take in anything other that brain numbing gun fights, explosions and car chases.

To say that," Goodman is smoking in the movie and I don't like smoking", OR they said "'Oh my God' in the movie and I don't like that", really has no relevance as to the validity of whether the movie was good or not. If people are so intolerant , then stick to watch lawm bowls. This is a brilliant movie that should not be missed.

All of which I like, but then, I like many different types of movies.
45 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Long in the tooth...too bad, because the acting and the suspense are solid.
imseeg17 August 2023
The bad: half an hour SHOULD have been CUT OUT of it. This story has SO MANY repetitive scenes I got bored half way through. I blame the writer.

The story is about a demon that passes on from one person to another when they accidentally touch eachother. This goes on forever and ever. Pretty boring after an hour or so.

Not any good then? A pretty silly script indeed, BUT they somehow managed to suspend disbelief, because however silly this story might be, there is still a level of suspense and mystery that is quite enchanting.

More good; Denzel Washington Denzel Washington Denzel Washington. It is HE that carries this movie. It is HE who has that irrestistable charisma. It is HE that delivers another solid acitng performance. And let's not forget some other powerhouse legendary actors like Donald Sutherland, John Goodman and last but not least James Gandolfini. Actor's movie!

Mixed bag. Great actors. Silly story that is way too long in the tooth...
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than you would expect
Idocamstuf15 August 2003
This was actually a pretty clever supernatural thriller. When released it failed at the box office, but has deveolped a following since. It's quite fascinating, hardly ever boring, has a nice cast, and is pretty creepy. It probubly failed due to poor marketing, because if a piece of crapp like "Hollow Man"(2000) can be a hit, this film should definately have been a hit. If you like supernatural thrillers, this will be right up your alley. *** out of ****.
45 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Spooky!
RockyAKAEggin17 February 2021
The Good:

  • Denzel Washington and John Goodman are as excellent as ever and create a believable on-screen friendship.
  • I really enjoyed the neo-noir style voiceovers that happened throughout the film as well as the noir themed soundtrack.
  • The creepy POV shots helped to elevate the horror aspect of the film.
  • Throughout the movie, the plot was intriguing and had some great tense moments.
  • I loved the idea of possession throughout the film. This created some really interesting dynamics and moral choices for the characters.
  • The final act is absolutely exciting, tense, and thrilling and definitely made this film a lot better.


The Bad:

  • The first 10 minutes of the film felt very convoluted and confusing to me. It hardly explained itself and left a lot for the viewer to decipher.
  • There were a few awkward character interactions within the first hour of the film that kinda took me out of the film.
  • Although the premise of the film was very intriguing, it didn't really engage me fully until the last 45 minutes.


Overall Fallen is a very well-made and entertaining 90s thriller with a unique premise and enthralling acting. The only thing that lets it down is its slightly slow pacing and lack of fully engaging scenes in the first half...

7/10
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Clever
mjw23058 March 2004
A chilling psychological thriller, that is cleverly written and superbly portrayed.

This film is not for everyone, you'll need patience and a real thirst for a good thriller. This film will play with your mind, it won't cover the screen with visuals and gore; that's why it works.

Sit back and be absorbed by the story, be amazed by the cast, and be shocked by the climax.

Warning, if you bore easily stay away, if you love a mind bending thriller; you won't find many better.

Fantastic and clever 9/10
210 out of 259 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great acting, fun twist to the plot, well filmed
secondtake10 June 2014
Fallen (1998)

Half detective, half supernatural thriller, this movie really moves. It's clever but not preposterous, and Denzel Washington anchors the whole things with his smiling believability. This is a good one. And the rest of the cast is fabulous, from John Goodman to Donald Sutherland. The one woman is the convincing Embeth Davidtz, and there is a small role even for the late James Gandolfini.

The plot seems straight up at first, as Denzel's character, Hobbes, looks for a murderer who seems to become a serial murderer. This morphs slowly into a a supernatural evil force inhabiting people and making them bad. This grows without a sense of shock so that there is a logic gradually built up.

And the target of this evilness seems to be Hobbes, though we never quite know why. (He catches bad guys and one of them is executed at the start, but the spirit shouldn't have been bothered by this.) Hobbes of course feels that the crimes don't make sense, and his encounter with Davidtz's character, who studies angels and spirits, is a turning point.

There are of course hundreds of horror films with similar kinds of plots, and what makes this one rise above most of them is how well made it is. Credit here goes beyond Washington, though he's clearly key. The cinematographer, Newton Thomas Sigel, is excellent (he also shot "Three Kings" and "Drive") and the coherence of the complex movie is partly because of a consistent visual flow.

Director Gregory Hoblit is mostly a TV guy, but around the time of this movie he made a few others with similar success, including "Fracture" which is quite good in the same solid way and "Primal Fear" which has a terrific performance by Edward Norton.

"Fallen" does come out of a familiar mold, and that is one reason why it is satisfying (many of us know we like this kind of film) and also limited ultimately (it isn't completely fresh, after all). I suspect nearly everyone will like aspects of this, even if the most demanding viewer will groan at some of the clichés. The acting alone rises up in so many cases, the rest is easy to really like.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Chilling yet intriguing
Jedi-2418 December 1998
Warning: Spoilers
Fallen is not your typical suspense film. There is very little gore, a clever plot, gorgeous cinematography...but it all adds up to the scariest movie I've ever seen. Why? It plays with your mind. The horror is confined to your brain and not shown onscreen. Some people will (and do) hate this film; it eschews graphic storytelling for a visual, intellectual approach. The ending, which has been criticized for many reasons, is actually the only plausible way it could end. Yes we like to see the human spirit triumph, but more often than not things do not work out the way we like them to. It's refreshing to see a movie which ends on a real level, giving the film a true-to-life credibility which enhances the terror even more. Highly recommended for the intellectual person. Those easily bored stay away.
162 out of 198 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Supernatural thriller with strong acting and spooky atmosphere
ma-cortes6 March 2012
Philadelphia Homicide detective John Hobbes (Denzel Washington) witnesses the execution of a serial killer named Edgar Reese (Elias Koteas) who is sent to the electric chair . Before dieing Reese unleashes an evil spirit called Azabel . Having captured the murderous , Hobbes is convinced that cops are the chosen people and he turns up on television smiling and proud . Soon after the execution the killings start again , and they are very similar to Reese's style . Azabel's aggressive spirit is passed along with touch , as a fluid is taken into the bodies , in a crowed city of Philadelphia anyone can become villain . Things get worse , however , when Hobbes is drawn to the biblical injunction 'hide your works' and strange words on walls and corpses .

This thrilling film written by Nicholas Kazan packs intrigue , action , chills , suspense , twists and turns . Hybrid of cop-thriller and supernatural story contains solid interpretations and eerie atmosphere similarly to ¨Seven¨ including a surprising final . On a metaphorical level , this does sense AIDS and a fear of the city are central to the 90s . Very good Denzel Washington as an obstinate cop who becomes involved about cruel ominous copycat murders but slow to realize an explanation beyond the normal . Magnificent support from John Goodman , Donald Sutherland , James Gandolfini , Elias Koteas , Robert Joy , Gabriel Casseus and special mention to Embeth Davidtz . Colorful cinematography in Panavision by Newton Thomas Sigel, including the fidgety camera zooms in fascinating way . Thrilling musical score fitting to action by Tan Dumb who the next year would win Academy Award for ¨Crouching tiger , hidden dragon¨. The motion picture is well directed by Gregory Hoblit , a fine professional who works as TV , he's co-producer with Steven Bochco , as Cinema in successful pictures such as ¨Fracture¨, ¨Frecuency¨, ¨Hart's war¨; his greatest hit is ¨Primal fear¨ . Rating : 6,5 . Good film , but some moments doesn't pay off and takes much too long to get where it's going . Worthwhile watching .
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
More Than Your Average Supernatural Suspense Thriller!
BigHardcore6 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
After my initial viewing of the movie, Fallen, I knew that I had just seen a brilliant film. However, I did have a few questions, mostly concerning plot holes and things of that nature, so I immediately watched the parts in question again and found that everything ties in nicely with very few, if any, plot holes. If there are, I can not find them.

John Hobbes (Denzel Washington) is a homicide detective who apprehended a killer named Reese, who is put to death for his crimes. Upon witnessing his execution, Hobbes continues on with his life until similar murders happen to catch his attention. It turns out that Reese was possessed by the demon, Azazel. Azazel is able to transfer himself from human to human simply by touching them, in most cases. So Azazel eventually finds himself a human host and begins another murder trail, confusing detectives by killing someone and leaving his hosts fingerprints and other evidence, then switching bodies and killing his previous host. As you can see, this can wreak havoc on a detective trying to solve these murders. Luckily, Azazel is more interested in exacting revenge on Hobbes than keeping his game a secret and lets Hobbes in on it, which is where the movie really takes off.

The directing and camera work in this movie was superb. It was done in such a way where you can see Azazel's spirit go from person to person simply by following the camera up and down the crowd and watching the subtle touches one makes in a normal walk about town.

Although this movie does require your full attention, it does not go unrewarded and you are not left at the end scratching your head wondering what had happened for the past 2 hours. All the answers to your questions are in there and that is why I think this movie is way above average. Why I have not heard of this movie before is beyond me. I think maybe the title came across as a bit generic, which the film is anything but. It comes highly recommended by me. 9.5/10.
130 out of 160 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Came across this and found some gems for a special market
Charlesc-526 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS

I will say my rating is only a 6 because I'm not a big fan of "superman" serial killer genre nor the narrative device that's used to explain how a killer can continue to kill after dying, but giving it a trial viewing on cable TV, I was pleased by a series of surprises that will make it worth watching for certain viewers.

The target who would get a special kick out of this would probably be over 40 and who are familiar with Philadelphia, PA. If you're under 35, seeing those actors who became familiar faces in the 15-20 years that followed won't give you a bump, and if you don't know anything about Philadelphia then that won't hold any special value either. But if you're from Philly and over 50, this is worth watching.

Credit to Denzel Washington who carries this movie. If you like Denzel your time won't be wasted.

I want to especially point out that in between the scenes of the main plot, there are any number of "quiet" scenes where Mr. Washington has these wonderful moments of "every day" dialogue with the supporting cast. There are many successful actors today that don't have the chops to do such "quiet" scenes convincingly, but Denzel shows us how its done.

The gems. The first gem is the location filming in Philadelphia, where I used to work, which is still near me and in my heart. For those who can appreciate it, the locations are a treat as they are in so many M. Night Shyamalan films. If that's not you, then you'll have a "meh".

The second gem is the virtual parade of Hollywood stars from the 90's and the "aughts", from movies and esp TV. Younger folk may not care about this AT ALL - these actors are no longer in the mainstream, but just to see John Goodman thrown in there without expecting him was an eye opener.

But the biggest "little" surprise is that this film was was obviously the "casting reel" for James Gandolfini to play the lead in the Sopranos which would begin the next year.

He's played different characters, but Gandolfini was definitely "playing" the Tony Soprano character here, accent and all. Early in the film there's a scene in a bar where he displays all of what became of Tony Soprano. He goes from threatening to affable, all within 2 lines of dialogue. A great actor who is missed. There's a scene in the police station where you can notice the difference in accents between Gandolfini and John Goodman.

Also is Aida Turturro, who went on to play Tony Soprano's sister, Janice. It's almost as if David "Sopranos" Chase saw this and said, "That's the feeling I want".

BUT, I'm familiar enough with film editing to bring myself to take away one star because what I thought were poor / lazy choices.

Given the fantastic nature of the story, when they could have / should have been creative, things start to look very familiar from other films and it seems that editing decisions were made due to time constraints.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
a ridiculous supernatural mystery
deschreiber7 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This movie might appeal to people who like scare themselves by imagining evil threats coming from the supernatural world, angels and demons and things that go bump in the night, but if you're more reality-based than that, you'll probably disappointed. The movie begins as a standard police murder/mystery, and the circumstances of the murders are peculiar enough to gain your interest. Too bad it couldn't have stayed in that realm. Without spoiling the film completely, it's enough to say that once it turned toward the supernatural, it fell completely flat for me. I mean, how can a serious actor like Denzel Washington speak those lines with a straight face? At least Donald Sutherland (who never seems to stop making one movie or another for a single day of the year) was given a part he could play straight without having to spout mumbo-jumbo. John Goodman only had to get himself through a couple of ridiculous lines. But poor Denzel was in the thick of it, pretending to be part of some titanic struggle of good vs. evil. Pshaw! The little twist at the ending was just SO cheesy, lifted from three hundred previous horror flicks; I wanted to spit. Another phony bit borrowed from every horror flick ever made was when Denzel is alone in the basement, scary, scary, suddenly there is a thunderous crash and something huge drops on him from above. Oh, never mind, it was just the old rotting ceiling falling in, nothing to worry about after all. Carry on. We do this in scary movies to keep you from getting bored. Eeyew! I also object to a good deal of the camera work, with all its quick cuts and constant shifting of angle and perspective so that you often don't know what you're looking at. To me that sort of thing is a poor man's substitute for a good script. I gave it five stars instead of less, because the mystery started off as something interesting and because of some of the this-world performances, such as Goodman's and the other cop (played by James Gandolfini, I believe). A movie of limited appeal.
34 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
timeeee is my side...yes it is!
rollernerd19 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Welcome to another edition of Adam's Reviews!! Queue in intro music**

Howdy folks!! Ladies, gents, I hope you all enjoy the show...Today's movie review is the chilling psychological thriller Fallen (1998) where the premise is literally 'don't trust a soul.' Let me first tell you this movie was not what I expected and the title makes more sense throughout the story of the film. Set in realistic and ordinary circumstances the film starts off with an evil villain who lives mostly in our minds with a flashback of when a character inviting the audience of a time they almost died which cuts to a death row gas chamber of a homicidal killer who was caught by my man Denzel Washington as the conventional Detective John Hobbes. The soon to be gassed to death killer uses his dying breath to sing an old Rolling Stones tune "Time Is on My Side." Soon we come across a string of murder threads that lead to whether the killer who got caught has a copycat...or perhaps it may be Denzel's character...or perhaps it is not what it may seem. The evil presence in the film moves from person to person, and there is a chase scene in a crowd that is eerily effective because there's no way to tell who the pursuer is. See the film, and you'll understand.

FYI for you moviegoers - this is not your typical thriller suspense film and may not be for everyone, especially for ones who have minimal patience as the movie does play with your mind and time as it lacks screen gore visuals. However to me thats how a thriller movie works, especially when it requires your full attention. Sit back and be absorbed by the story, be amazed by the turn the plot leads towards and be intrigued by the climax of this underrated film. Kudos to the director Gregory Hoblit for crafting an intricate story which engaged me from the get-go. The story is elaborate and will keep you guessing till the very end, in particular, the narration aspect of the movie was a really clever little add-on and literally ties the whole movie together. However, it is not nearly as good as it could have been and has a sense of an afternoon movie but it is the execution of a great idea that makes it fun to watch - overall 7.5/10.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Time is on my side.....
FlashCallahan7 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Detective John Hobbes attends the execution of serial killer Edgar Reese. They have a private chat where Reese gives him a riddle of sorts and then speaks in a strange language.

The riddle leads him to a once decorated officer who went to his cottage in the woods and killed himself.

It was never explained why but when Hobbes looks around the cottage, he finds the name Azazel on the wall. Hobbes soon learns that Azazel is an evil spirit who can transfer itself from one person to another through touch.

As Hobbes comes to realise the extent Azazel is responsible for much of the evil around him he also realises that Azazel is after him.......

If you remember the Lou Diamond Phillips movie from 1990 The First Power, you will realise that this is nothing more than a remake of that movie, albeit with a higher calibre of acting on show, and all the camp jokes taken away in favour of straight up thrills.

Washington is the Everyman police officer, and this was the point in his career when he was still having fun in his career, starring in more low budget B-movie fodder like this and Virtuoisty, rather than being more choosy like he has been in the last fifteen years (2 guns aside).

And it's pretty good stuff, quite creepy in places, and there is one scene where Davidtz is being chased down the street by the Demon, but it looks more like an extreme game of tick/freeze-tag.

There are a few questions that are unanswered that really irk the viewer, I really wish the his brothers character was fleshed out more, and the ending doesn't really make sense, why didn't he let him bleed slowly to death and run off?

It's not a bad film though.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A potentially great movie that falls short
Darguz20 September 1998
What could have been a great movie unfortunately ends up rather lame. The premise is excellent: A fallen angel moves from person to person, wreaking havoc and playing mind games with a police detective. There is some interesting supernatural lore and some good acting all around. But the story never really builds up to full speed, and the ending is a gross disappointment: for one thing, it's obvious about halfway through the movie, and for another, it just plain sucks. You're left thinking "That's *it*?" This movie is worth seeing, but be warned that the ending will leave you hanging.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fallen
CinemaSerf28 August 2023
I must have watched this film three or four times now, and each time it takes me the first half hour to recall. It's an intriguing story rooted in Aramaic mythology but applied to 20th century Philadelphia. "Hobbes" (Denzel Washington) is a detective who worked on the case of serial killer "Edgar Reese" that saw him captured and executed. Not long after this supposed closure, however, other - very similar - crimes start to occur and he and his partner "Jonesy" (John Goodman) are perplexed. He keeps hearing a song - the same song the deceased sang as he died, but the people singing it are different. There is something mysterious afoot that can inhabit a body, move effortlessly and invisibly from one to another - and it seems to have "Hobbes" in it's sights. Desperate to shield his family from this evil, he must try to find a way to destroy it before it destroys him. It all takes too long to get going, and Goodman is not particularly well cast, but once we have the gist of the plot then Washington and director Gregory Hoblit turn in quite a well put together story, using the photography well to give us a perspective from our menace whilst effectively conveying the sense of nimble mobility this creature possesses as the resourceful "Hobbes" tries to combat it. Donald Sutherland pops up now and again, to no real purpose, indeed much of the supporting cast sort of blend into the wallpaper of this exercise that really plays to the strengths of an on-form Washington delivering a solid and interesting theme. It's too long, but still worth watching.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Overlooked movie
groohl11 July 2005
This is a psychological thriller with every ingredient you could ever want for a great movie-experience in that genre. Denzel Washington acts brilliantly as the highly renowned detective Hobbes who's in for quite an experience. Co-actors, including John Goodman, Donald Sutherland and James Gandolfini also shine in this movie. Great acting, a story full of suspense and surprises, great score and some nerve-rattling scenes makes this a perfect movie worth buying for your collection. It's not only a great murder-mystery detective movie, but it probes deeper into the realms of faith, religion, philosophy and imagination and thus stands out as a movie more memorable than most. If you like "Seven" and "The Ninth Gate", you're certainly gonna like this one. I've seen it at least 6 times.
109 out of 137 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Predictable and average at best.
null-1322 August 2005
The movie was pretty much predictable from beginning to end. The ending was predictable too. I guessed the ending almost from the beginning and definitely mid way through the movie. I also feel the movie made the demon's abilities to jump bodies too easy and made him basically invincible from the beginning of the movie, making this movie predictable. If they made him a bit more vulnerable while he was in a human form, it would have been more unpredictable and exciting. I think if they also elaborated on the demon's origin, it would have drawn the watchers closer to the movie. I know the reason why they made the demon easy to jump bodies and why they made him pretty much invincible, but i think it made the movie almost pointless and predictable. And the girl that helped Denzel, u would think that should could have had a bigger part in the movie and made it more interesting. This movie was not scary but had the potential to be.
14 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hugely underrated, one of my favourites of the decade
Leofwine_draca11 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
With a clever central premise and a refreshing lack of any special effects work whatsoever (apart from a nifty 'demon vision' which is used occasionally), FALLEN is a cut above the standard fare of today's American horror films. With a more complex plot than usual (for once, the film doesn't underestimate the intellect of the viewer) and plenty of suspense and nightmarish scenes built up, this will be a refreshing treat for any horror fan.

It must be made clear, though, that no matter how clever FALLEN thinks it is, one thing it is not is original. While the theme of the story's hero being implicated in the crimes by the real, supernatural criminal of the piece harks back to CANDYMAN, the real concept of a force which can swap bodies at will actually goes back to the late '80s in the form of such cult classics as THE HIDDEN and SHOCKER. This time around the evil force is more believable though, because there are no rubbery or slimy special effects, the demon is ever invisible. If you will, more is less.

One thing I liked about this film is that full use is made of the demon's ability to swap bodies, and many times it escapes just as its about to be caught. Dozens of people get the demon inside them, and there is one great moment where it travels through a queue of people, as one after another they transfer the demon to each other. Another disconcerting moment is when the demon gets inside the police station and one person after another starts singing "time is on my side". Aside from the central killer, the film is very much in the style of SEVEN, in that the settings are gloomy and there is a depressingly downbeat ending. The influence of THE X-FILES is also clear, with impossibly bright torches lighting up dingy surroundings, and Washington could easily be substituted for Mulder.

Denzel Washington is well-cast in the role of John Hobbes, a typical everyday sort of detective who displays no psychic powers or anything, he's just a believable, clever guy who uses his wits to catch the demon out. Washington is given able support by three actors and actresses who perform well in their roles and who all come out looking good. Firstly there is John Goodman, looking very much older these days, who plays his typical mild-mannered friendly person. Donald Sutherland is also on hand to lend distinguished and solid support, and it's always great to see Sutherland in a film. Whatever critics might say, he's a good guy. Embeth Davidtz (ARMY OF DARKNESS) plays the female lead who is unsurprisingly underused, but for once she plays a well-drawn out, realistic female character in a horror film.

Fallen deserves kudos for being a little bit more intelligent than the more typical blockbusters filling out the horror shelves these days. There are plenty of twists for the mystery fan to enjoy, and a gripping finale, which, like ARLINGTON ROAD, doesn't succumb to the sappy sentimental ending so beloved of most of these films. I can only praise it for the lack of special effects which, like THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT showed, don't necessarily make a good film.
37 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I've never understood the hostility towards this film
MovieAddict201617 July 2006
In my opinion "Fallen" is one of the better supernatural thrillers to come out of Hollywood in the past few decades. It's smart, slick and well-acted - not exploitative or full of "shock" material (gore-wise), but rather it operates on a more intellectual level.

Denzel Washington and John Goodman are both superb as NYC cops who begin to believe a string of murders are being committed by a demon - the same demon that had earlier possessed a serial killer who was executed in the beginning of the film. As Washington investigates further he realizes this demon can jump from one person to the next (resulting in a rather eerie scene on a sidewalk in which the demon skips back and forth from each passerby). This may sound utterly silly, but the way it's filmed is what makes it effective.

The ending is a shocker and the script by Nicholas Kazan ("Reversal of Fortune," "Bicentennial Man") offers decent dialogue.

If you like atmospheric thrillers you should check this out.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
little recognised classic
robbik25 August 2001
Denzel Washington gives a strong performance in this surprisingly little known gem from director Gregory Hoblit. A classic detective thriller with a demonic edge, this film managers to keep the suspense running until the very end. With one of the most dramatic and scary personal chase sequences ever brought to the big or small screen, this film has it all, including a strong cast (Donald Sutherland and John Goodman in a surprisingly convincing non-comedy role as Hobbes partner to name but a few.)

Now reduced to a cheap video rental, if you have a spare evening, watch this film. Some great lines, truly chilling storyline, and believable characters played by a superb cast, all add up to make this a movie well worth a look.
89 out of 121 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mostly Good
gavin69429 October 2015
Homicide detective John Hobbes witnesses the execution of serial killer Edgar Reese (Elias Koteas). Soon after the execution the killings start again, and they are very similar to Reese's style.

Roger Ebert gave the film a mixed review, writing "the idea is better than the execution, and... the surprises become too mechanical and inevitable." There is some truth to that. The biggest problem is just how long the film runs. There seems to be plenty of fat that could have been trimmed.

It also seems "too neat". This killer (or demon) could be going around, ruining people's lives, but he is obsessed with one cop. And rather than kill the cop or ruin his life, he first decides to drop hints on how to figure out he is a demon and how his power is transferred. Sure, you need some kind of exposition, but it just makes no sense.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Glacially slow pace kills it.
hesketh279 December 2022
When somebody writes reviews saying that a film is "slow" or "boring" I usually tend to dismiss them as being from people who prefer action pictures and have simply watched the wrong movie for them personally. On this occasion I have to agree, certainly that this is a very (and I mean very very) slow film. Unfortunately, so slow that it fails to build tension. It's a good premise that demons could use humans to commit their evil and there are a couple of genuinely chilling moments in the film. So chilling that I had to let my dog into the yard half way through and a sudden unexpected noise in the dark made me jump out of my skin. There was so much scary potential there. The cast is good as would be expected, but I can't help wonder if Denzel Washington is miscast. His "cool" laid back attitude doesn't convince. Here's a guy menaced by Satan's agents on Earth, but he doesn't seem to show the slightest fear or break into a sweat. Come on - even the bravest man would start to crumble. Seeing a quick flash of the demon inside on the face of it's hosts would have made the film far more frightening (an effect used very well in "The Exorcist"). All in all, it's an OK film but it somehow misfires. I can't put my finger on why.

By all means see it, it has it's merits, sadly not enough to make the 2 hour runtime (was it really only 2 hours??) worthwhile for me. My partner has a habit of saying "that was good" at the end of most pictures we watch. There was no comment at the end of this.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed