Last Night (I) (1998) User Reviews

a film that lingers on the mind.

[marcadam · 8/10 · 15 August 2004]

i never realized how beautiful a song Guantanamera was, until i heard it in this movie. Whenever i hum the tune nowadays, i can't help but think of Last Night(and the last scene). Ihighly recommend seeing Miracle Mile, after you've see Last Night. It is as close to an American version of this film as you are ever going to see. It is almost just as good. In my opinion, the best line in the movie comes when the old woman makes the very politially incorrect statement, that she tired of hearing about the children,because they are too young to miss anything. If the world weren't ending in a few minutes, you know she wouldn't be exposing her true feelings. I loved this film, beginning to end.

Impressive tale of love in a time of universal ruin

[howie73 · 8/10 · 31 December 2004]

Don Mckellar's direction is outstanding in this typically edgy yet slyly romantic Canadian offering. Taking place during the last night on earth, the film expertly follows the lives of a group of people all of whom are dealing with the end of the world in their own inimitable ways. Yes, this is not something original but somehow Mckellar (who also acts in the the film) has fashioned a very watchable tale whose power lies in what we know is going to happen rather than how we get there. With a touch of off-beat Canadian humor the mundane and the surreal are often counterpointed to provide some dark humor, but the film's visual wit and wonderful use of music adds another eerie dimension. Mckellar never tells why the earth is coming to an end but there are enough 'bright' clues to satisfy the curious. It's a shame this film hasn't had more exposure. Perhaps its detached, deadpan wit was too Canadian for many.

Flawed, but beautiful; on my shortlist

[ajmilne · 8/10 · 5 June 2003]

Don McKellar's less pretentious works (here, I exempt the Red Violin, of which I am not particularly fond) always seem to deliver what I need, if not quite what I want. There's always *something* about each work that bugs me a bit; but like the bit of gravel in your hiking boots that makes the trek that little bit more memorable, that little bit more real, I always wonder: would I really have been happier without it?

Last Night -- a subtle, oddly serene film about the world ending, not quite with a bang, not quite with a whimper -- but with a gently rueful, and very human, shrug -- is typical, in this regard. I more than merely like this film -- I believe I'd put it among my top ten favourite works, and I've seen a *lot* of movies -- but as a matter of honesty, I have to warn anyone who hasn't seen it yet, it does have more than a few rough edges.

The acting's a bit uneven, and ranges from borderline painful to actually stunning; I find the occasionally hysterical mother played by Roberta Maxwell painfully cliched. Bujold, on the other hand, you just have to see. Oh is memorable, surprisingly powerful. McMullen I still can't make my mind up about. McKellar is, well, McKellar. I can't help liking the character, even if it does seem a manipulative kinda setup that makes it so.

The script does amble a bit. It's kinda the nature of the story. And McKellar's fondness for clever, throwaway lines sometimes gets the best of him, in my view, both in his own part and in McMullen's.

But these are minor flaws, forgivable (or, as above, perhaps necessary), in an otherwise actually brilliant piece of work.

And overall, the writing, I have to say, is the best I've seen from McKellar yet. This a very delicately balanced script, marvelously restrained. Somehow, McKellar has made a movie in which regret, euphoria, and dread circle each other warily for an hour and a half, without melodrama once rising up out of the mix. There are believable moments of hysteria; they generally punctuate the prevailing current of reflection, resignation, and quiet desperation entirely believably and appropriately.

The ending... I'm not breathing a word about the ending.

Apart from this: it's flawless.

My vote: see it.

Moving, intriguing, and credible

[Arkaan · 2 July 2000]

I have seen this film twice, and believe that it is certainly one of the best films of 1998. One person brought that people wouldn't be violent on the day when the world ends, but come together in a type of philosophical togetherness. I was stunned by that idea, assuming that the cynicism that permeates today's culture would have enforced that idea, that violence will be around. The end of the world is a violent thought, as exemplified in films such as Armageddon and Deep Impact (true, they were stupid films). But that aside, Last Night is a powerful and very introspective look at the lives of several people who's lives happen to be interwoven on the last day of the world. It begs the question "what would you do with the final six hours". Many have remarked on the tone, and I have to heap more praise on the subtle irony that is found throughout the film. Why is the world ending? The audience doesn't find out. Whether one's appreciation of the film diminishes or grows for this ambitious step is purely personal. For a ninety minute film, it's ambition in depicting six lives is interesting, and it's only mistake. For the movie to do justice to all the characters, it needed to be at least half an hour longer. But that singular flaw does not negate the film's final achievement.

The entire cast is sensational, even if they're on for short periods of time. Rennie and Oh took home well deserved Genie awards for their brilliant performances, but I felt McKellar's performance was the most intriguing. He has a talent for not poignant drama, but scenes of almost deadpan-type comedy (where Sandra asks him the favour).

Don McKellar has got to be among the most versatile writers around. After writing Thirty-Two Short Films About Glenn Gould, the fragmented biopic about the famous pianist, and The Red Violin, another slightly fragmented story told through and about a violin, he wrote, directed, and starred in Last Night, and apocalyptic dramedy (or an ironic tragicomedy), and he does it with supreme style. Last Night is a film not to be missed, but to be pondered over and savoured.

A disappointment.

[gridoon · 6/10 · 30 July 2003]

Don McKellar tackles an unimaginably difficult and thought-provoking subject matter here - too bad this shallow, sombre and often dull film doesn't do it justice. It does have some funny and poignant moments (as well as some that are both funny and poignant at the same time - a man says to his friend "See you later" and the other guy responds "No you won't"), but ultimately there are no real revelations, nothing you couldn't come up with yourself, without seeing the movie. When the highest compliment that people pay to a movie in the vast majority of the reviews here is "There are no special effects", you know you're in trouble. (**)

Apocalypse on a human scale

[Adrian Sweeney · 10/10 · 18 November 2005]

The world is going to end at midnight; it's six pm now. The impending catastrophe has been known about for months but nothing can be done about it.

Government has been wound down. There's a certain amount of mayhem, looting, and bloodshed in the streets, but most of that ended weeks ago; now people are just quietly resigned. The nature of the disaster is never specified or even mentioned, but cleverly hinted at. Sooner or later you'll suddenly realise what it must be to do with, and when you do it's a breath-catching moment. Once you notice this, the closest thing the film has to a big special effect, it becomes increasingly appalling as time goes on.

There are to be no last-minute attempts to save the earth. They were known to be futile before the film begins. Instead, people calmly make preparations for their last night alive. It's a bit like wanting to do something special for your birthday. Craig (Callum Keith Rennie) is living out the four-letter answer most people would give if asked 'What would you do if the world was about to end' - as he has been, methodically and systematically, for the past few weeks. Sandra (Sandra Oh) is trying to get across the chaotic city to her beloved husband. Patrick (Don McKellar, who also wrote and directed, brilliantly) attends a last family meal and plans a quiet evening alone with a Pete Seeger record. Almost everyone else is heading downtown for the big end of the world party.

Flashes of black humour help make things bearable, but I can't convey how genuinely chilling and terribly moving the film becomes before the end. Pre-millennium there were a handful of end-of-the-world films, most based around big-budget special effects. For a grumpy misanthropist such as myself, who officially couldn't care if the world was to end, even a blockbuster disaster movie like Deep Impact was a salutary experience, making me realise that I really, really don't mean that, and that for all its travails and miseries life is precious. But by excluding special effects and scientific explanations, and precluding the possibility of averting the end, and focusing entirely on the human, Last Night is far, far better and left me drained and devastated.

I almost prefaced these remarks with a 'Don't watch this alone' but decided, nah, other people can be a pain when you're trying to watch a film. But if you watch it alone and late at night as I did, be warned that after the end you may feel a strong urge to make contact with one of those annoying other people, at 2 in the morning, a friend, a relative, your milkman, anyone.

But watch this you must, for it's a great cinematic work of art.

If it is the last thing you ever do.

[michaelRokeefe · 6/10 · 10 January 2008]

Don McKellar writes, directs and stars in this dry humored drama dealing with the end of the world. Citizens of Toronto deal with the world's coming to an end at the stroke of midnight and new millennium. Some celebrate with violence, some vandalism; Patrick Wheeler(McKellar)suffers through a faux Christmas reunion. But he wants to spend that last moment alone in his apartment. Sandra(Sandra Oh)tries to get across town to commit suicide with her husband. A gas company employee(David Cronenberg)spends his time making courtesy calls. Craig (Calllum Keith Rennie)hopes to achieve sexual satisfaction with a special list of women...a black woman, a virgin and his favorite old teacher(Genevieve Bujold). Patrick finds Sandra at his doorstep wanting to use the phone. He tries to help her home, but as the final moments of time ticks, the two are pointing pistols at each other's head. I almost gave up on this film twice; but there was still something about it that kept me watching. Like a bottle of Scotch, LAST NIGHT requires an acquired taste.

I joined IMDb to write this

[jay-453 · 10/10 · 7 November 2004]

There are films that are great, but by virtue of their intelligence and understatement fall through the cracks - or go on over the years to achieve 'cult' status. Paul Auster's 'Smoke', or Thomas McCarthy's 'The Station Agent' are a couple. This is such a film, and for fans of these types of 'smarter', less 'hollywood' productions there is no greater cinematic experience than finding such a gem. This is unpretentious and real - and ultimately honest and rewarding. Don McKellar has crafted something really special.

different kind of apocalypses movie

[SnoopyStyle · 6/10 · 10 November 2015]

It's the last night on Earth. There are six hours left before an unknown calamity. Patrick Wheeler (Don McKellar) wants to be alone for the event but he has to go to a family dinner first. Sandra (Sandra Oh) is going home but her car gets trashed. Craig Zwiller (Callum Keith Rennie) has a series of women come over to his apartment.

I think the movie needs to concentrate on McKellar and Oh. It would be more compelling to make this a buddy road movie. They could go to Wheeler family dinner, meet the various characters and go back to his apartment. I don't think Zwiller's story is that compelling. The other characters add some quirkiness but none of them are that compelling. It would be better to make these actors support the McKellar Oh story. This is an interesting different kind of apocalypses movie but I only enjoy parts of it.

Haunting and Lovely

[wesberger · 9/10 · 23 July 2005]

I found LAST NIGHT quite thought-provoking and moving the first time I saw it and its impact on me has only grown over time. This is an amazingly sophisticated and well-executed film for a first-time director. What I find thrilling about it is both the fine balance it finds between ideas and emotional resonance and its sense of tonal unity and control. The images and music have stayed with me for years. Despite the melancholic events of the story and the sense of loss that permeates the film (after all, we are talking about the end of the world here), a mordant sense of humour and finally a romantic, optimistic heart leavens the story's darkness, without pushing the movie into cheap sentimentality or melodrama (Armageddon, anyone?). All this and only one of the most memorable closing images in modern film! Seek it out. It's worth it.

An interesting allegorical tale

[itamarscomix · 7/10 · 7 July 2012]

Last Night is an original and intelligent Canadian independent film that takes a literal look at the phrase "live each day like it was the last day of your life"; it starts with the hypothetical situation in which the world is about to end, and the date and even the time are known to everybody (don't look for any scientific logic behind that - the actual method of the apocalypse is left intentionally unclear), and follows several characters who have different ideas of how they want to spend that final day.

The concept is appealing and immediately creates an infinite number of possibilities; the script makes the most of it, though I feel it could have been better. My main problem is with the main character - played by writer/director Don McKellar - who takes up a large chunk of the screen time but is far less interesting than most of the secondary characters (this is not because of McKellar's acting but mainly because the character is probably an avatar for McKellar himself and therefore far less extreme). This, couple with acting that is sometimes great but often wooden and lacking in emotion (a strange trait of many Canadian independent films) makes the film less effective emotionally than it should have been, and keeps it in the category of though-provoking allegory and intellectual exercise. As such, it's a wonderful little film and a very unusual one.

Quietly thrilling, darkly humorous, poignant and haunting.

[Galvano · 9/10 · 20 January 1999]

I saw LAST NIGHT last night at a special London preview where we all had to fill in a questionnaire. I don't know if this was just to formulate a marketing campaign or (more worrying) to consider making changes to the film. So just in case, let me say to the powers-that-be, DON'T CHANGE A THING! LAST NIGHT is wonderfully refreshing and intelligent. No cheap thrills or laughs. Nothing derivative or patronising to the audience. It has an integrity increasingly rare in modern cinema. Don't just 'forget Armageddon', it's misleading to even compare them. A sense of impeding doom is treated here like a collective state-of-mind rather than an externalised visual spectacle. It's elegantly spare in both look, writing and performances. Quietly thrilling, darkly humorous, poignant and haunting. Faultless on every level. Congratulations to McKellar, and the team for making the film you wanted to make, without the destructive influence of corporate interference!

It's the End of the World As We Know It (& People Don't Feel So Good)

[NormS · 7/10 · 2 November 1999]

Don McKellar's version of humanity's last few hours on Earth is an ambitious take - unfortunately, his approach in the first half of the movie is bogged down with his creating hip, unseen connections among characters, to play with both structure and the audience. McKellar is wry and sad as Patrick Wheeler, a man determined to spend the last hour or so of his life alone; Sandra Oh, as a woman trying to return home to her husband, is energetic and heartbreaking; and Callum Keith Renne really shines as an old buddy of Patrick's trying to complete a lofty "project" before life's end.

Thankfully, Last Night's redemption (before the end of the world, of course) is that McKellar puts away the trite "six degrees" game half-way through his tale, and completes a touching, human movie about people's final choices (or lack thereof). The final 15 minutes is a wonderful combination of freakiness and emotion, with the sincerity and motives of the sometimes-bland characters finally realized. In all, a vote of a '7', as it seems that this movie will get better with repeated viewings.

Depressing, incredulous context, poor characterization - not worth seeing

[Dilip · 3/10 · 19 December 1999]

I skimmed what others on the IMDB database had to say but I must just have not understood the film. A friend and I were what we thought to be 15 minutes or so late, so stayed to watch the beginning of the next showing, but it turned out we had only missed about 5 minutes. We had hoped, in vain as it turns out, that we would learn some context as to why/how the world was about to predictably end, cleanly right at midnight one day. When we left shortly after we got caught up, it was a relief for me to leave behind this depressing and unbelievable film, literally a welcome breath of fresh air.

The plot is simple - for some unknown reason, the whole world (or at least all humans) will come to an end at midnight, and if you listen carefully for just a few offhand and quick lines in dialogue, you will also note that this has been known for a few months and that night hasn't fallen in some time (how could this be? Has the earth suddenly stopped rotating? Would India be in total darkness if Canada is in total light? Is the Western Hemisphere coming to an end?? Have people really given up? Who knows.). What would you do if you knew for a fact that the world were about to end? And had a few months to prepare for it?

You have to abandon your credulity even further, as the characters portrayed are largely 2-dimensional and whose motives and actions make little sense. Some may choose quite contemplation (a few of the characters pray), some may go mad (as one mother seems to have), some may review their lives (as a family does), but is human character so evil and interested in senseless entropy as to engage in pointless violence and property damage, crass behavior, and the like? I would think not - I would think that such a calamity would tend to make people introspective and to commiserate and hang together as a global community.

Philosophical perspective aside, the characterization had no depth. The camera techniques were mildly interesting, often involving shooting into hazy light, but the camera was not kind to the characters, making most of them look unflattering. How could this have been called a comedic drama? It was depressing through-and-through and the drama was very weak, with there being no attempt portrayed to understand/overcome the demise - instead all is just a rather ineffective depiction of individual reactions to the impending doom.

Rating: 3 out of 10, though I'm wondering why I rated it so high - maybe because of some of the great songs from the 1970s (for example, I was delighted to hear "Jimmy Loves Maryanne" by Looking Glass of "Brandy" fame - I didn't know anybody knew this other song of theirs!)

what REALLY matters

[uszoni2003 · 1 July 2004]

Don McKellar directs/wrote/stars in one small movie that asks us... what is REALLY important?

The world is about to end (how is irrelevant) and we follow a (seemingly) random bunch of people as they fill there last hours.

On one level they all want to make dreams/desires/fantasies they've held onto happen. Our main character, Patrick Wheeler is caught between fulfilling his parents plans and his own.

I don't want to give too much of this simple, beautiful and heartfelt movie away, but I think it boils down to a question of opening ourselves up - to be less alone - and to let love in. I think that one thing Mr. McKellar is trying to say is that the power of love- true love (NOT lust) will get us through - no matter what the obstacle.

I've seen this movie several times, and am the last person to be swayed by big Hollywood films that try to "steer" you to "feel" for their characters. Last Night is NOT an action picture. It moves slowly, and builds to an ending that never fails to bring a tear to my eye. I hope you enjoy it is much as I do.

Sun is out in toronto at midnight!!!!

[p_shinde2004 · 6/10 · 6 June 2008]

y is sun out shining at midnight 0'clock!!!!!! can anyone tell this? y is sun out shining at midnight 0'clock!!!!!! can anyone tell this? y is sun out shining at midnight 0'clock!!!!!! can anyone tell this? y is sun out shining at midnight 0'clock!!!!!! can anyone tell this? y is sun out shining at midnight 0'clock!!!!!! can anyone tell this? y is sun out shining at midnight 0'clock!!!!!! can anyone tell this? y is sun out shining at midnight 0'clock!!!!!! can anyone tell this? y is sun out shining at midnight 0'clock!!!!!! can anyone tell this? y is sun out shining at midnight 0'clock!!!!!! can anyone tell this?y is sun out shining at midnight 0'clock!!!!!! can anyone tell this?y is sun out shining at midnight 0'clock!!!!!! can anyone tell this?

A great movie, and perhaps the first ever "fade to white"

[ToldYaSo · 9/10 · 17 June 1999]

My wife and I had the pleasure of seeing the premiere of "Last Night" with auteur Don McKellar himself presenting the film at the Toronto Film Festival in a humble and appreciative manner. An appropriate choice as the film showcases many scenes in the streets of Toronto. It's always a small thrill when watching a film that was shot on the street where you work or somewhere familiar.

The reception for the film was extremely positive, but I guess it's fair to say that the audience was fairly biased. Nevertheless, it portrayed with equal amounts of seriousness and black humour the nature of humanity as it might act in the last hours of civilization as we know it. No fanfare, no 'splosions & lasers, no asteroids plummeting from the sky, no glossy veneer, in essence, a breath of fresh air.

Part of what made "Armageddon" so unbearable to sit through was it's choppy editing and utter refusal to sit in one place for a moment and see how events affected those involved. The filmmakers were more interested in the number of action sequences rather than focusing on the story. Quite simply, compared to "Last Night", "Armageddon" just seems like a multi-million dollar joke of a movie. I'm sure all those involved in it were amply compensated financially, but at what cost to their credibility?

"Deep Impact", another end-of-the-world epic, on the other hand, had a far stronger story element, whose only weakness can be found in the contrived youthful love story that defies interest on many levels. To its credit, "Deep Impact" features Morgan Freeman, who is a stunningly gifted actor who brings depth and credibility to everything I've seen him in. But "Deep Impact" is in it's heart, another action flick, and therefore not in the same category as "Last Night".

"Last Night" dares to delve into areas of the human psyche that neither of the other two films explore: Denial. Insanity. Lust. Loneliness. Suicidal tendencies. Embracing nihilistic impulses. Utter chaos. Depression. Compulsion. You know, the finer things in life, the magic stuff of huge box office receipts. I guess it's fair to say that this film is not an upbeat, life affirming experience that is geared towards everyone.

"Last Night" tackles an age old prophecy, the end of mankind, with an entirely fresh and innovative approach. It doesn't treat the viewer like a child that needs to have everything explained in detail. It really doesn't matter why or how the world is ending when nothing can be done about it anymore, now does it? The film's "fade to white" at the end stands as a perfect example of the ingenuity exercised.

Without question, this film is more thought provoking and engaging than either of the other two aforementioned efforts. Given it's low budget and Canadian affiliation, it's also unlikely to reach the kind of audience that "Deep Impact" and "Armageddon" enjoyed on their opening weekends. You've really got to hunt for the gems sometimes.

Interesting Characters in a bad science fiction film

[keldin-2 · 7/10 · 10 January 2001]

This movie, although not the best science fiction movie, still kept me up until 2 am on a work night. I liked the character developments, even if the science fiction was low budget. Basically, the plot of the movie goes like this - it is 24 hours before "Some" bright object collides into the Earth. There is no more night, since the object is so bright. The details of all that are never revealed, but the movie is more about the characters than the plot. What would you do if the world was being destroyed in less than a day? The main character's family decide to have Christmas day again. Making an ad-hoc family get together with all the typical family fighting. (even though they all really like each other, no one can express it). The guys best friend tries to make out in as many ways and combinations as possible. The best character is the Asian lady trying to get to her husband through the throngs and chaos in the streets but can't quite make it. The film is worth watching and deserves a solid 7.

This movie became one of my all-time favorites after about 3 minutes of watching

[tantalum · 10/10 · 28 May 2004]

Surreal, human, funny, deep. This movie avoids the 'technical' aspects of Armageddon, it is a certainty, and it looms over the characters wherever the story takes them.

Rather than nitpicking, Don McKellar takes his characters on a strange voyage through the human condition, with everyone spending the last 6 hours of their lives as amplified versions of themselves right up to the very end - experiencing love and fear, examining their values, making choices, learning, growing and being reborn.

If the world was ending in 6 hours, I would probably spend 2 of them watching this movie.

"It's the end of the world as we know it (and I feel fine)"

[room102 · 7/10 · 25 January 2003]

What would you do on the last night before the end of the world? "Last Night (1998)" is the story of several people, all connected in some sort to one another, and each having different plans for spending the last few hours as well as the last few seconds before it all ends.

The movie, made for $2 million, was nominated for 13 Genie awards and won 3. Don McKellar (Exotica, eXistenZ), who wrote, directed and stars, got many awards for this movie, including a Genie and a Cannes Film Festival award.

The cast consists of some of Canada's best talents, including director David Cronenberg (as Duncan, the gas company executive who ensures his clients to serve them up to the end), the beautiful Sarah Polley (Exotica, The Sweet Hereafter, eXistenZ, Go), Sandra Oh (The Red Violin), Genevieve Bujold (Dead Ringers), Jackie Burroughs (The Dead Zone), Arsinee Khanjian (Exotica, The Sweet Hereafter, and wife of director Atom Egoyan), Callum Keith Rennie (eXistenZ) and more.

my favorite end of the world movie

[Movie_Man 500 · 8/10 · 26 August 2005]

Stark, original piece set in Canada has a really depressing, terrible feeling behind every scene, but how else can you make a movie about the last day of human survival? Every character is sadly, gloomily interesting, especially the great, under-appreciated Sandra Oh, who gives the picture most of its immediate emotion. Her character is married to a key figure in the story played by David Cronenberg, who just happens to be the best film maker Canada has ever produced. His plot is just as upsetting as everyone else's, although McKeller's rather sexy buddy seems to be having the most exhausting fun. He's going out in style with pleasure. Hint: he even hits on poor gloomy Don for one last experimental thrill... tho Don wimps out and turns him down...Another great actress, Genevieve Bujold, plays a nice role in several stories. She still looks stunning as she ages. And her accent. Probably worth hearing as the world is slowly dying. Outdoor scenery is mesmorizing. Indoor scenery is quiet and unsettling. You definitely need to be in the mood to watch this. It always leaves a rather brutal impression...

Slow, but not stupid.

[GlasSpyder · 7/10 · 7 March 2000]

Good characters helped to make this a watchable film. The pacing was slow, but I didn't find myself checking the clock. It's an interesting study of how people make peace with themselves and sometimes with each other at zero-hour. It's better if you don't mind never quite knowing why the world is ending. And I always enjoy Cronenberg, whether he's behind or (in this case) before the camera. Give it a try.

Yes!

[rinodelvecchio · 9/10 · 25 June 2020]

Watched this again after watching it 20 years ago. A criminally underrated gem. I liked it then, but I love it now. Wish Canadians would make more films like this. What ever happened to Don McKellar?

Magnolia at the end of the world

[DCBlank-5 · 7/10 · 30 September 2000]

An interesting film that actually does better than the later "Magnolia" in tying the fates of its characters together. Some fine performances (special mention to Sandra Oh in that department), and a nice job of ending the world without loads of pyrotechnics. A good idea well executed.

unbelievable & Boring

[jaybob · 2/10 · 6 September 2001]

To make any film about the supposed end of the world, there should be some facts & realism 1. We are never told why these people believe this. 2.Location is New Years Eve In Toronto Canada . SO PLEASE SOME ONE TELL ME WHY WAS THEN STILL SHINING AT MIDNIGHT & WHY(based on the costumes) DID IT SEEM LIKE SEPTEMBER

3. The acting was in that neo-au-natural style, that needed a director who knew how to do it.

4. the individual story pieces were all dreary & without any purpose. I could go on, But I do not want to make this as boring as the film.

rating *1/2 (out of 4) 2 on IMDB scale

thank you I am as always

JAY HARRIS (aka)SIRBOSSMAN