José Giovanni's most ambitious work, "où est passé Tom " ,in spite of great qualities , is a confusing movie .It's a long way from the immediate demonstration of this director's "le rapace" (1968) to the laboured mechanism of the unsung "où est passé Tom?" .
Tom is a pacifist ,a man who lives in harmony with mother nature : the cinematography by Pierre-William Glenn is splendid indeed : Giovanni was a mountaineer ,a cousin of mine once told me he did mountain-climbing with him ,and one feels his love for the wild landscapes of the peaks . You'd never guess that he is part of an association whose purpose is to help free the political prisoners : one sees him at the borders ,welcoming the dissidents .One of his colleagues , a passionaria flesh on the bone , urges the members of this society (set in Genova ,Switzerland) to put nonviolence aside and to take the plunge :bumping off a dictator;it steers us back onto the very subject of "le rapace" ,in which Lino Ventura played a mercenary who agreed to do that job for dough .
There the comparison ends ; Tom's dreams begin to torment him : but what can a peaceful guy ,who has never handled a gun in his whole life (he was probably a conscientious objector),do ? Up comes the wonderful Alexandra (when she appears , who can tell that the beautiful Alexandra Stewart was ever so lovingly filmed?) : perhaps, the late sixties:/early seventies zeitgeist ,woman's lib movement ,can explain this strange circumstance : this extremely handsome lady will teach the pacifist how to shoot !Stewart was the unfortunate heroine of Giovanni's first effort "la loi du survivant" and her part here is too underwritten ,although we're spared the obligatory bed scene . ( Unlike what many false precis of the movie claim, she does not help Tom during his mission ,she tries to prevent him from doing it)
Then ,there are many gaps ,many implausibilities in the screenplay : why for instance doesn't Tom kill the dictator in the cemetery ? In this country , anyone can just walk right in ; when it comes to being naive ,nay stupid , Tom's passionate colleague wins hands down : doesn't she ask if one can visit the fortress which she knows is a jail for political prisoners ? Tom , a rookie as far as fighting is concerned , single-handedly takes over the fortress ,after spending agonizing days in a dungeon !Rambo is not far away!
But Giovanni (whose eventful life was evoked by the precedent user ,a French cinema connoisseur) regains his soul in the last sequences which justify the sentence I quote in my title :freedom is a relative concept, freedom does not make you totally free , when you believe in the fate of your country and its oppressed people ; although he's been betrayed by one of his prison mates ,Paul Crauchet 's character forgives him and only asks for his shirt ,should he die before him. The only motive of a fugitive is to enjoy the sun.
All in all, bewildered and perhaps bitter , Tom ends up in Chico,the young idealist of "Le rapace" 's situation .
As for the country where the action takes place , the bullfight may suggest Spain before the death of Franco ,but politically the movie remains vague , concentrating on an idealist whose principles are hardly put to the test.
Tom is a pacifist ,a man who lives in harmony with mother nature : the cinematography by Pierre-William Glenn is splendid indeed : Giovanni was a mountaineer ,a cousin of mine once told me he did mountain-climbing with him ,and one feels his love for the wild landscapes of the peaks . You'd never guess that he is part of an association whose purpose is to help free the political prisoners : one sees him at the borders ,welcoming the dissidents .One of his colleagues , a passionaria flesh on the bone , urges the members of this society (set in Genova ,Switzerland) to put nonviolence aside and to take the plunge :bumping off a dictator;it steers us back onto the very subject of "le rapace" ,in which Lino Ventura played a mercenary who agreed to do that job for dough .
There the comparison ends ; Tom's dreams begin to torment him : but what can a peaceful guy ,who has never handled a gun in his whole life (he was probably a conscientious objector),do ? Up comes the wonderful Alexandra (when she appears , who can tell that the beautiful Alexandra Stewart was ever so lovingly filmed?) : perhaps, the late sixties:/early seventies zeitgeist ,woman's lib movement ,can explain this strange circumstance : this extremely handsome lady will teach the pacifist how to shoot !Stewart was the unfortunate heroine of Giovanni's first effort "la loi du survivant" and her part here is too underwritten ,although we're spared the obligatory bed scene . ( Unlike what many false precis of the movie claim, she does not help Tom during his mission ,she tries to prevent him from doing it)
Then ,there are many gaps ,many implausibilities in the screenplay : why for instance doesn't Tom kill the dictator in the cemetery ? In this country , anyone can just walk right in ; when it comes to being naive ,nay stupid , Tom's passionate colleague wins hands down : doesn't she ask if one can visit the fortress which she knows is a jail for political prisoners ? Tom , a rookie as far as fighting is concerned , single-handedly takes over the fortress ,after spending agonizing days in a dungeon !Rambo is not far away!
But Giovanni (whose eventful life was evoked by the precedent user ,a French cinema connoisseur) regains his soul in the last sequences which justify the sentence I quote in my title :freedom is a relative concept, freedom does not make you totally free , when you believe in the fate of your country and its oppressed people ; although he's been betrayed by one of his prison mates ,Paul Crauchet 's character forgives him and only asks for his shirt ,should he die before him. The only motive of a fugitive is to enjoy the sun.
All in all, bewildered and perhaps bitter , Tom ends up in Chico,the young idealist of "Le rapace" 's situation .
As for the country where the action takes place , the bullfight may suggest Spain before the death of Franco ,but politically the movie remains vague , concentrating on an idealist whose principles are hardly put to the test.