Sword in the Moonlight (1957) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Nihilistic samurai
allenrogerj7 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This a portmanteau review of all three parts of Daibosatsu Tôge.

An adaptation of the first volume of a forty-one volume roman fleuve, in three parts, taking nearly six hours- and it still doesn't get everything in!

It tells the adventures- symbolically significant in Buddhism, it seems- of a nihilistic and murderous samurai, his family, his lovers and his enemies. Chiezo Katsaoka at first seems too old and too passive for the lead role, but eventually his impassive face and emotionless bass voice seem appropriate for a figure who is- partly at least- an agent of fate, rather than entirely acting by his own will. From the very opening, the ambiguity is there: an aged pilgrim prays to die before he becomes a burden on his grand-daughter and Ryunosuke kills him at once. The thief who sees the killing then dedicates his life to looking after the grand-daughter, and Ryunosuke's career of slaughter begins. Good things first: as always with Ushida there are wonderful shots; the fight scenes are powerful and Ryunosuke's own helplessness in the hands of the fates is well-conveyed. Indeed, two scenes in part two, one where Ryunosuke, now blind, kills several samurai with a flute (for some reason, no doubt symbolic, Ryunosuke is a flute virtuoso) and another where Hyoma- who pursues Ryunosuke through the films in search of revenge- kills a few with his bare hands effectively make the supernatural aspects to their nature manifest without being absurd, and another in part three where Ryunosuke and his disfigured lover emerge from a burning house and he kills a few people in an extraordinarily choreographed fight, shot in a single take, are astonishingly effective. However there are also enormous faults- the plot isn't effectively controlled or restricted- characters appear and vanish, either completely or for a couple of hours, and their fates are unexplained; indeed there are large gaps in the plot- we never learn how Ohatsu ends up in the household of the wicked lord Kamio (her aunt sold her, in fact) or how the circus acrobat escapes in his meeting with Ryunosuke. The two lords, Kamio and Makio, whose rivalry takes up quite a bit of the film just vanish when we know too much about them to accept it- indeed, when the rivalry between progress and reaction seems to have taken over as the centre of the plot; Ryunosuke's lovers get killed with tedious frequency so he can move onto the next episode; his pursuers miss him when they could deal with him; eventually, he drowns trying to rescue his son (who isn't actually in danger) from a flood, and probably evades hell as a result and it needn't have taken anything like as long. Wonderful scenes, but it just doesn't hold together.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I Preferred the 1960 Version, Satan's Sword
jrd_7310 May 2024
I must agree with the fellow reviewer who found this version of Daibosatsu Toge (The Great Buddha Pass) not as interesting as the Ichikawa Raizo version from a few years later.

Sword in the Moonlight is a decent samurai film, but since I have watched Sword of Doom and all three Satan's Sword movies, I felt somewhat underwhelmed by this version. Of course, I am aware that the Sword in the Moonlight films came before Satan's Sword, but it comes after the Ichikawa Raizo in my film viewing life. There are differences. For instance, in Sword in the Moonlight, the villainous Ryunosuke Tsukue does not sleep with his rival's wife until after the duel. I was also glad that this first film did not end on a cliffhanger like the first two Satan Sword films. Sword in the Moonlight has aspects to recommend it.

In the end, I think the problem rests with the leading actor. Chiezo Kataoka is a decent actor, but he is no Ichikawa Raizo. Furthermore, he was in his mid-fifties when he made Sword in the Moonlight, which seems a bit old for Ryunosuke Tsukue, at least for me (others may not have that problem).

I have not read the source material, so perhaps Sword in the Moonlight might be closer to the spirit of the books. I do know that, as cinema, I preferred Satan's Sword from 1960.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Superlative cinema
Quotation-of-Dream21 February 2020
This is the first of Tomu Uchida's trilogy of films (1957, 1958, 1959) which make up his version of the 'Daibosatsu tôge' story. There are, of course, other adaptations, but I will confine my comments to this one.

Uchida is one of the greatest Japanese directors, and he shows many of his qualities in this extraordinarily beautiful and visually imaginative film. Individual shots, especially those of Dojo and Inn interiors, are stunningly composed and wonderful for the eye to linger on.

The anti-hero - a wandering ronin samurai whose philosophy and 'silent' school of swordsmanship incline him to the 'dark side' - is an unusual character to find at the centre of a samurai film, and the fighting is confined to a handful of precisely choreographed minimalist "ballets", of great power. Ryonosuke is played by the ageing, almost immobile and reptilian-voiced Chiezô Kataoka, in one of his most compelling portrayals. His alter ego, the young samurai, Hyoma, represents the 'light side' and is perfectly portrayed by the young Kinnosuke Nakamura.

The characters and action around this pair develop a Shakespearean depth and range as the trilogy progresses. Though all is not perfect - the action can seem over-compressed (perhaps due to cuts) which works against the stately and noble pace of the whole five-hour epic. But even if this is not Uchida's greatest film - not quite reaching the consistency of 'Bloody Spear on Mount Fuji' or his five-part 'Miyamoto Musashi' sequence - it is full of breathtaking cinematography, excellent acting and exquisite artistic composition. Hugely absorbing!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
1957 vs 1960 version
Angel_Peter19 February 2019
I have to say I saw the 1960 version starring Raizô Ichikawa first.

Lead actor does really do a lot of difference. I feel Chiezô Kataoka seems to old for what I feel Tsukue Ryunosuke should be. I may be wrong there of course :) But I think the 1960 version of Tsukue Ryunosuke seems more cold and scary. and the scenes were just set up in a much better way saying a lot more.

Otherwise I guess it is okay but I would go directly for the 1960 version if I was going to choose. i feel both mood and the lead does a big difference for me giving the advantage to the later version.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed