A Tale of Two Sisters (2003) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
305 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Well Shot & Atmospheric Horror Picture
john_ccy3 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I just saw "A Tale of Two Sisters" last night and really enjoyed it. I've been a big fan of Asian horror films recently and think that this is a strong entry from South Korea. There aren't many jump out at you scares as in the usual American horror film, but the director does maintain the off-kilter and foreboding mood very well, especially in the awkward character interactions with each other. Most of the scares are more conceptual and plays on everyone's "there's something under the bed" fears from when they were a child, but in this case, it's the closet and the sink. I also liked how the director was able to capture just how dysfunctional this household is through scenes such as the first dinner that the characters have together. He's also good at revealing people's inner life and fragility through simple scenes such as the stepmother wiping off her make-up in the mirror or her sitting in front of the flickering TV. I think this film is mainly an exploration of guilt and the consequences of living with that guilt hanging over you.

MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD (DO NOT READ ANY FURTHER IF YOU DO NOT WANT THE TWISTS OF THE MOVIE REVEALED) I was following the story pretty well, but did start getting confused during the bag dragging part. However, I think the flashback at the end definitely tied everything together. The film is very much like "The Machinist" in the way two of the character's joint guilt eventually leads to mental breakdowns and delusions.

Here's my interpretation of the film. The Su-Yeon that we see after the girls supposed return to the house is either the delusion of Su-Mi or the actual ghost of Su-Yeon that only Su-Mi can see and interact with. The initial stepmother that we see is, in my opinion a delusion of Su-Mi. There is a real stepmother, however, and she first appears in the film when she's wearing the gray pantsuit. I believe it's the real stepmother that the father is talking to on the phone throughout the first part of the movie and she doesn't appear until he pick her up and brings her to the house. The stepmother before that point is imagined by Su-Mi (perhaps part of her split personality?) That explains the bizarre dinner party sequence when the stepmother's brother looks at her like she's crazy and doesn't remember anything that she recounts. I think it was Su-Mi acting out her stepmother part of her split personality. The film shows this later in the bag dragging scene and scenes such as the stepmother wiping her make-up in the mirror, which is revealed later to actually be Su-Mi wiping her make-up in the mirror.

I think the ghosts in the house aren't entirely imagined by Su-Mi, and are either of Su-Yeon or the mother or both. In the final flashback, it is revealed the Su-Yeon was wearing the green dress and had the hairpin in her hair when she died. This is the green dress that they showed before on the ghost sitting at the dining room table while the stepmother was looking under the sink. Also, it's the hairpin that Su-Yeon was wearing in the flashback that appears on the floor when the stepmother is looking under the sink.

The real stepmother, in the end, gets punished by the ghost of Su-Yeon who comes for in a scene a little bit like The Ring. After that, the flashback scene ties it all together in terms of how both the stepmother was mainly responsible for her death, while Su-Mi unintentionally played a supporting role.

I wonder if the "mother" that Su-Yeon sees when she goes up to her room to cry, in the flashback, is a ghost already. Perhaps by that point the mother had already killed herself in the closet. That's left ambiguous.

Other things that are suggested, but not clearly explained in the film is that it seems like the stepmother, at some point, was a nurse, perhaps taking care of the mother and somehow may have contributed to her death too. It's not clear when her relationship with the father began and whether it caused the mother to kill herself. It's also suggested that the mother had mental issues too, requiring a nurse. The stepmother alludes to this when she tells Su-Mi, you're beginning to take after your mother. I don't think she meant just physically.

Also, if we accept that the initial stepmother that we see is actually Su-Mi, then there's the suggestion of incest too, since the father sleeps with her. Is that why Su-Mi freaks out and shouts, "Don't touch me" each time the father reaches for her in a later scenes? Is that the "filthy things that you've done" that she alludes to in a later conversation with the father? This film is interesting in it's capacity for different interpretations. A few of the scenes, however, were kind of derivative, such as the woman in the black crawling around scene, which reminded me of the herky-jerky movements of Kayako in the Ju-On/The Grudge films. Also, the final scene where the stepmother finally gets her just desserts is reminiscent of The Ring. Furthermore, just the idea that some characters may be ghosts is taken from "The Sixth Sense" or "The Others".

Overall, I enjoyed it, however, and it will be interesting to see how the Hollywood remake (that's already in production) turns out. I have to be honest, I liked both "The Ring" and "The Grudge", so I'm not one of those snooty types who insist that remakes can't be good too. One remake that I'm really excited about is "Dark Water" coming out this summer. I haven't seen the original Japanese version yet, but both films are definitely on my to-see list.
84 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good, although a bit confusing
paulclaassen13 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The film is off to a slow yet mysterious start, but it quickly turns very suspenseful. It gave me gooseflesh at times! The father is a very timid and passive character and does not contribute to the story much. The film ultimately becomes very weird where the characters are truly completely mad. There's a lot that's difficult to understand, especially when we get to the twist. If she's hallucinating due to the medication, how does the hallucinations interact with the characters - especially the dead sister and stepmother? Towards the end I got confused with who was real and who was not, and who actually became someone else.
24 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Better than all the Ringu's, Ju-on's and Jian Gui's together!!
Coventry30 April 2005
Perhaps I'm one of the only avid horror fans who thinks that the recent overload of Asian shockers is so over-hyped! Films like "Ringu" or the "The Eye" – which are praised all over the world – simply didn't convince me and they looked more boring than frightening. Well, this blunt opinion doesn't go for the South Korean gem "A Tale of Two Sisters". This is a stylish and utterly complex psychological terror-tale that REALLY gets under your skin! The plot, based on a local folklore tale, might be a little too confusing to get this film listed among the all-time greatest genre achievements, but the atmosphere and tension-building surely provokes feelings of great respect. This is one of those few films that are impossible to label: the events in "Two Sisters" qualify as mind-bending horror as well as intense family drama and a deeply psychological portrait. Besides a mesmerizing story, "A tale of Two Sisters" also has all the great elements that I feel are usually missing in Asian horror films like compelling music, good acting and innovative camera-work. The mansion were the family events take place is brilliantly illustrated like a truly creepy place where secrets and danger lurk behind every door. Several sequences (like the dinner with relatives or the nightly appearance in the girls' room) are pretty much the ultimate in eeriness. They really made me feel uncomfortable and I do like to believe that I've seen my share of spooky horror. "A Tale of Two Sisters" is a terrific movie-adventure and a definite must see for Asian film fanatics. A little warning for people with a short attention-span, though: this movie forces you to have your eyes and ears focused at at all time. It's also a film that requires repeated viewing, even though no one will never really "get it" for a full 100%.
112 out of 162 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
So solid in construction, so consistent in tone and so beautifully disorienting
BrianThibodeau25 August 2004
A TALE OF TWO SISTERS goes the furthest of any Asian horror film in proving that Asian horror films are the only horror films you really need to watch. As someone whose grown to love Asian chillers, and as someone who lives for those precious moments when a film actually surprises with a twist ending that I didn't see coming (or at least suspect), I was totally blindsided by this film's intricate plotting.

The set up is simple. Two girls return from the hospital after an extended illness with their father to an imposing, rural, Korean-Gothic house. Almost immediately, their snarky, vaguely condescending and suspiciously omnipresent stepmother (Yeom Jeong-ah, who played a pivotal character in TELL ME SOMETHING) is on them, welcoming them and criticizing them in equal measure (a not-unfamiliar Korean trait, though it deliberately borders on parody here). The tension between the three women only grows thicker from there, as the stronger sister (Im Su-jeong) protects - and increasingly, harmfully overprotects - the weaker sister (Mun Keun-yeong) from the stepmother, who may be a stronger threat than either of them can handle and who blithley informs them that life's a bitch sometimes and she ain't gonna go away!

Obviously, relationships in the household have deteriorated to the point of open hostility and mindgames to which only the puzzlingly sedate father seems immune. Just when one wonders how much better - or worse - things were before the girls were sent away, the filmmakers drop the first of two twist-bombs that instantly provide clues to the pre-story, hints at a possible murder in the very recent past and makes the viewer replay the preceding hour in their mind from a whole new perspective. Absolutely brilliant, but it doesn't end there.

The feud continues - and the hints at prior foul play multiply - until the father decides enough is enough and finally turns to outside help to smooth things over, at which point the puzzle starts to become diabolically clever.

I can see where just about anyone reviewing this film has to remain frustratingly vague in regards to its psychological underpinnings, so solid is its construction, so consistent is its tone and so beautifully paranoid and disorienting is its atmosphere that upon a second viewing, you'd be hard-pressed not to stare at your companion's face (or the collective faces of an audience, preferably) instead of the screen as the realization sets in.

Structurally, comparisons could be made to similar supernatural American thrillers (one in particular from recent vintage) where the ending forces you to reevaluate all that has gone before - and, of course, to rescreen the film to see if the director was sharp enough to include the visual cues you obviously missed. Only this time out, supernatural explanations are not required to understand the bizarre, seemingly paranormal goings-on inside the house. Quite the opposite, really, as suspension of the audience's belief in the supernatural is the film's ultimate goal (after gleefully, necessarily trading in spook show delights for the better part of two hours, no less), and a more clever mechanism by which to do it I've yet to see, even in the consistently intelligence-rewarding pantheon of Asian horror.

Truly a fantastic, artistic piece of movie-making. Highly recommended. (Incidentally, if you purchase the Korean Special Edition DVD, there's a lengthy series of deleted scenes that, while fascinating and informative in their own right, ably demonstrate how tricky this film must have been for the director to pull off . Though several of the scenes clearly give away just a teensy bit too much information, once you've seen the film, it's nice to see how they actually further support the psychological intentions of the filmmakers yet, at the same time, had to go.)
187 out of 236 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
a complex plot.... maybe too complex
AvionPrince1611 January 2022
I dont really know what to say. I didnt enjoyed the movie but i didnt hate it too so im quite balanced in my opinion because sometimes i didnt understand some of the moments of the movie but i need to say that the movie have a complex story maybe too much and can confused the audience in my opinion. Some interesting characters, some tense moments and an intriguing plot. A good experience of Asian horror but i need to say that the plot is too much complex in my opinion.
19 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Psychological Thriller, Horror, and Drama, all at their best
opiemar2 May 2004
'A Tale of Two Sisters', or 'Janghwa, Hongryeon', is a true masterpiece. Brilliant psychological thriller, heart-wrenching drama, and gripping horror all wrapped up in one beautifully orchestrated package. From the intricate plot, to the beautiful cinematography, to the absolutely perfect casting, every aspect of this film is extraordinary.

For fear of revealing too much concerning the plot, I will just say it is very satisfying. While it may appear to be a little difficult to understand at first, it does a good job of explaining things in the end. And whether you prefer psychological thriller, drama, or horror, I promise you will not be disappointed.

From a technical standpoint, its nearly flawless. The set, the cinematography, lighting, and especially the soundtrack, all are captivating. The waltz seemed an odd choice at first, but proved to be an ingenious choice.

As for the casting, we're talking absolute perfection. I'm Su-jeong is totally convincing as the defiant, yet troubled Su-mi. Mun Keun- yeong is equally convincing as her emotionally traumatized sister Su-yeon. These two girls were magical on the screen. I will certainly be looking into their other films. Yeom Jeong-ah is deceitfully cheerful and hauntingly evil as the stepmother. Finally, Kap-su Kim gives an excellent performance as the weary, broken father.

I truly love this film. If you have yet to see 'A Tale Of Two Sisters', I strongly recommend locating a copy. It is a real gem, worthy of anyone's collection.

(10/10)
234 out of 283 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mixed
begob28 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Interesting story, digging back through the mystery to the original event. The reveal caught me by surprise, and I think I just about figured out the plot, but I was left wondering if the earlier parts were consistent with what we found out later on.

Two big minuses. The pace is slooow. Apart from the dream bits, the first fright came at 75 mins. The characters are really well acted, but a lot of the time I was begging them to speak, to let me have some information. It was all so solemn. The worst example of this is at the dinner party, although there was a great performance in that scene by the step-mother - but that also raised questions about the final outcome. Why were the guests so uncomfortable with her?
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
See this masterpiece before Hollywood destroys it.
simonmills4717 January 2005
The recent history of Hollywood remakes of ghost/horror films from the East has been dismal. This film will inevitably suffer the same fate, so get a copy on e-bay or similar.

It is well photographed and the sound is superb. Viewing on a good screen and with a good 5.1 or DTS enabled sound system is recommended. Obviously it is subtitled, so if that puts you off, then I wouldn't bother with this. Dubbing rarely works and simply would not do here.

It is also genuinely frightening, with excellent performances from a cast who will be unfamiliar to Western audiences. I would particularly single out the stepmother character, who was utterly brilliant. The ending will have you wanting to watch it again, if you can cope. The plot is relentless, and offers no comforting moments of release along the way.

If I do have a small criticism, there is perhaps a detectable influence in certain scenes from the Japanese version of The Ring. We have, however, accepted straight copies of other peoples' ideas for Western films for years, and so my point is a limited one which did not prevent me from giving it 10/10. I believe most fans of this genre will derive huge "pleasure" from this film which I for one hope goes down as a classic.
193 out of 245 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Could have been better
siderite16 July 2005
I didn't find this movie at all brilliant. While it had an unexpected ending and an interesting idea, I felt that as a movie it failed to deliver.

First of all it is a slow paced movie. I am an avid movie seer so I may be expecting too much of movies that I have to watch as quickly as possible so I can watch the next one. But really, the moment when you begin to doubt your initial perception of the film comes only after 50 minutes. So why did you watch the movie for so long? Only to be misled and understand what the main character really goes through? I feel this is way too much.

There there are the ghost things. I don't know what kind of ghost stories Asians have. All I am able to see is their movies. I even tried learning Japanese once so I can read the literature, but I obviously couldn't. Must all the ghosts be slimy, wet, at the corner of the eye of people that are always too scared to move so they can see the ghost and when they finally do the ghost is gone? I mean, OK, it feels scary to hear the screeched violins on the background, but that works only a couple of times. Then it is not scary anymore!

Finally , this is a confusing movie. After you think you know what the movie is about, there comes something to prove you wrong. This is usually the hallmark of brilliant movies. However, the brilliance comes at the end, with a moment of great understanding. Janghwa, Hongryeon does not provide this moment. At the end you know you got it all wrong, but however you turn the movie inside your head it doesn't really make sense.

It is not really scary and it is confusing. So, I will rate it low.
22 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Unique and genuine Korean fright-poem!
Vomitron_G16 April 2006
The Beauty. The Terror. The Poetry. The Horror. The Innocence. The Guilt.

Maybe that's just about all I should write in this comment for A TALE OF TWO SISTERS. The best thing is to just watch this movie without knowing anything about it. I myself didn't even know one single thing about the history of the two girls when I went into this movie. I just took a look at the nice cover-art, didn't even read the synopsis on the back and popped it into DVD-player. I only knew that it won several prices on festivals around the world and that it came highly recommended.

The DVD-cover read "The Most Frightening Film since THE RING, THE GRUDGE and DARK WATER". Though the frightening-part might be right, you can forget about the rest, because the only thing A TALE OF TWO SISTERS has in common with those movie is... a ghostly apparition with long black hair. It's even a bit unfair to compare it with those famous Japanese movies, because this Korean movie has a lot more to offer and is in fact a bit more complicated and intelligent than those others.

This movie simply is a small masterpiece, and here are some reasons (without telling anything about the plot): The movie itself caught me off guard at least two times with clever surprise-twists. And just when you think you've had the conclusion (whether you get it or not, that's irrelevant for the moment) and you think the movie will end... this movie goes on a bit longer. The cinematography is amazing, using bright colors during the day and dark shades at night. The camera-work is excellent with the director sometimes choosing impressive, if not, innovating angles. Some shots are pure poetry (e.g. the top-shot with the two sisters at the lake). It all looks very stylish. There are only four main characters, but the intrigue surrounding them is intense. The story itself starts a bit slow, but there's a lot of variety in tone and emotions to keep it interesting. There was even one scene (when the girls took off towards the lake) that suddenly had me remembering Peter Jackson's HEAVENLY CREATURES. But when the horror kicks in, it's quite effective. There are also a few successful surprise-scares in it. Damn, I jumped right up from my sofa. The musical score is great, and at times when it's not supposed to be scary, I couldn't help but noticing that it had sort of an Italian feeling to it. A bit strange for a Korean movie. But nevertheless, a great score. So much care went into every detail of this film, including a perfectly balanced surround sound.

I also think that calling A TALE OF TWO SISTERS just a horror movie is giving it not enough credit. It's more a mysterious horror-drama that works both on a psychological and supernatural level. No matter how you look at it, this is Asian horror that ranks way up there amongst the finest. It might not be gory, but it gets pretty scary at times and the subject matter is pretty disturbed. So if you haven't seen it yet, then find a copy, pop it into your DVD-player, go with the flow and make sure you give this movie your full attention for it's 110 minutes running time.

There, I hope I did a good job praising it without spoiling anything.
140 out of 176 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A psychological thriller masquerading as a ghost story.
BA_Harrison30 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
If there's one sub-genre of horror that I find completely underwhelming, it's the spooky Asian ghost story: the slow burn approach, creepy kids, long haired women and drab, colourless cinematography have a similar effect on my brain as a mild sedative. A Tale of Two Sisters has had much praise thrown its way, so I hoped that it might go some way to changing my opinion of supernatural Eastern cinema.

No dice!

In a nutshell, director Ji-woon Kim's film is about a girl, Su-mi, who is unable to come to terms with the tragic deaths of her mother and sister; she creates characters and events in her mind to help her cope with her loss, blurring the lines between what is real and what is fantasy, and confusing the hell out of me in the process.

Now, usually I don't mind films that screw with your mind, but in this instance, the approach taken by the director is so convoluted and the 'surprise' revelation (that Su-mi isn't dealing from a full pack) not all that surprising, that I felt rather cheated. I don't mind reading message boards to help me fully comprehend a film that I have watched, but when there are so many elements in this one movie that fail to make sense without in depth research, then I must question the director's ability to tell a decent story rather than my ability to understand it.

A Tale of Two Sisters isn't awful—the acting is good, the cinematography lovely, and the music haunting—but neither is it the paragon of excellence that many claim it to be.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Top notch South Korean horror.
HumanoidOfFlesh8 June 2004
"A Tale of Two Sisters" is a brilliant South Korean psychological horror that left me speechless.The film offers some delicious moments of ghastly horror and is extremely creepy.The small cast of actors is truly excellent,with lead Im Soo-jung being especially memorable in the lead role.The direction by Kim Ji-woon is well-handled and the cinematography is absolutely gorgeous.The plot is slightly confusing,but some scenes are wonderfully eerie.The action is rather slow,but I was not bored in the slightest;I was extremely curious and intrigued.The house,where the film takes place looks incredibly menacing and isolated."A Tale of Two Sisters" is along with "Ringu" and "Kairo" one of the most original Asian horror films I have ever seen.Watch this masterpiece as soon as possible.My rating:10 out of 10.
145 out of 194 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a psychological thriller worth seeing
aminifatimaaa29 December 2018
Remarkably formulaic, but it has the right to be called one of the scariest movies ever made. The experience in the cinema was unforgettable. Some clichés are intentionally used in an effective way and some others are kicked out of the house. Ji-woon Kim is aware that what we need sometimes are some good heart attacks throughout, adding thought-provoking drama in the process, but when a film is different and tries to stand out, it shows. A good horror film.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Two hours of people sulking in silence
CuriosityKilledShawn23 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
What a let-down! If you're looking for a tense, intelligent horror mystery then you've looked in the wrong place if you come here. A Tale of Two sisters is flat, illogical, pretentious, slow, boring, and mind-numbingly tedious. The only reason I didn't switch it off is because I couldn't be bothered reaching for the remote. This might be because the English subtitles lost something in translation, but there's no denying that it should have been tighter.

The story has two sisters (who appear to be fraternal twins, though the actresses are 7 years apart) return home after a stint away only to find creepy happenings in their country home. After what feels like a million years it builds to a big twist that contradicts the narrative structure that led to it.

Kim Jee-Woon has made some great films, including A Bittersweet Life, but I was very disappointed with this snooze-fest. The inappropriate score doesn't help much either.

There are some great Asian horror movies out there. This is not one of them.
53 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Am I dumb or is it the movie's ending?
fedor87 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
More like "A Muddled Tale Of Utter Confusion". Or "Yet Another Asian Tale Of A Long-Haired Zombie Woman/Girl Appearing Out Of The Furniture". Do we need more dead Asian girls walking slowly with their faces covered with black hair? Come on! That shtick is getting old, everyone! Funnily enough, those scenes aren't even that bad. The style and the acting is quite solid, the mood is okay, but… The main problem is the plot, which is as confusing as any I've seen in many years. Not nearly as absurd i.e. dumb and unsolvable as for example "Lost Highway", but not far from it either. From the point we find out that the older(?) sister is imagining her long-dead sister, things get incomprehensible. The moment of finding this out is good, but it's downhill from there. What follows is a series of scenes that, though at least effective and not boring, pile on the confusion to the point when one simply gives up on the plot.

There is a certain line that can be blurred between reality and fantasy/hallucination, but that line isn't so much blurred here as it's simply crushed, obliterated. Who is seeing whom? Who is doing what and when? Who exists and who doesn't? Who is looking at what and why? It's just a jumble. This is supposed to be based on an old Korean tale. Let's just hope traditional Korean tales aren't this confusing but are only told in such a way. At one point the stepmother says "how did it come to this?", and I was thinking "come to what?!... what the hell is going on?!". In the end we find out how the mother and the sister died, and the way the latter dies was very silly indeed. Even sillier was how the stepmother reacts to this accident – namely by not telling anyone! Sorry, that is too stupid… The cupboard falls on the girl, and stepmom just walks out?????
20 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Stunning
scobbah15 November 2005
OK, I just saw this film and a good one-word review would simply be "wow". I had heard a lot of things about this one before finally pulling myself together to see it and I suppose the film was doing justice to the buzz. I'm a big fan of this genre, but I was a bit surprised by this one as it contained less (didn't lack, just contained less) of the "psycho Hideo Nakata-style" and more of an intelligent and quite deep plot instead. I'm happy with this one, but it took me some thinking to draw a conclusion afterward. I had a slight idea (at least I thought) about how it all was tied up together, but I had to read some spoilers in some forums to ensure myself that I had gotten it all right. Here's some great horror for you to tune in to and if you like a decent mix of psychotic thrilling moments - this one will for sure please your urge.

7/10!
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
You MUST see this!!!
afdiazr5 December 2005
I love horror films, but I think they work way better when they hide a dramatic impact behind (The Devil's Backbone, The Exorcist, for example). This is that kind of film, and it's not only eerie and terrifying when it has to be, it is also really beautiful. A Tale of Two Sisters starts really slow, so if you're in a hurry to see ghosts in the first 20 minutes you will be disappointed. Actually this is not a ghost story –though there are some. It's something more complex, and it's done in such a way that it beats Ringu and The Grudge out of the ring no sweat. A Tale… is a way more clever film than those huge cultural hits, because it really cares for its characters, and the direction is flawless. Every detail in this film will leave you breathless if you're the kind of person who loves to pay attention to details while watching a movie. The acting is superb, specially from the stepmother and the main girl. Those two are worth the price of the ticket alone. Do yourself a favor and watch this awesome film.
106 out of 142 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Honest thoughts + people rating it 1 are stupid
marsipanunicorn6 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I might have been slightly disappointed with A Tale Of Two Sisters as I was expecting a horror flick, maybe something about the stepmother going insane and killing the sisters. What I got was an almost two hour long film with an ending almost impossible to predict. While I liked the twist, there wasn't an amazing buildup. It felt quite clear that someone was dead or nonexistent, the plot twist was finding out who it was. If you look at The Sixth Sense, what makes the twist so good it that it's realistic and makes sense, but also because it's predictable. It makes you want to go through the entire movie again to look for all the clues. With ATOTS there are no clues to tell you about Su-mis DID or that she is impersonating the stepmother. There's also the ghost woman who I assume is the mother as she has long hair (and is dead) but while we see the ghost we have no idea who the mother is or what she looks like, making it impossible to predict the ending. There are also scenes where Su-yeon (the dead girl) is alone but we still se her experiencing things like a normal person, which is a really dumb way to try and make the audience think that she's not dead, as well as make scenes where she interacts with the stepmom/older sister on her own, like when she is locked in the wardrobe. This also, by the end of the movie, ends up feeling like a cheap way of covering up the fact she's dead.

I don't think this movie was complete trash, however and it did have some good aspects story-wise. I liked that there was more than one twist and that you really had to watch til the very end to understand it. It wasn't just "Boom! The younger sister was dead all along! End" there was more to it. I genuinely enjoyed it and many times it had me on the edge of my seat. I just think it could have been put together a little better, and a lot of scenes felt unnecessary and like they were just dragging the film out needlessly.

Besides all this, I've read some of the 1-star reviews and a lot of them are just.... stupid. I also tend to dislike pretentious artsy films, and this was a bit pretentious, but it was still a good movie. I know a lot of people were unsatisfied with it considering how long it was and how little happened. But you should have considered the fact that this isn't really a horror film. There is a long buildup because there is so much more to the characters and the family than you think. As I said in the beginning of this review, I expected this to be a more classic horror, but it wasn't, which was the main reason for my disappointment. But I don't think it's fair to rate this genuinely good movie low because "it's not what you were expecting". If you want something predictable without long scenes go watch a slasher.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dark and authentic film of the world of the imagination's ability to distort and frighten..
joebloggscity26 November 2005
I first saw this film two years ago in the cinema, and fell in love with this dark tale of two brooding teenage sisters coping at home in their large country house with their father and step-mother. Their relationship with their step-mother is strained to say the least, with the step-mother appearing to be increasingly becoming unstable in her battles with the younger girls. The film though slants with Oriental style ghost effects and horror, which adds a strange and unsettling aspect to the story that on first viewing is not clear, but is all the more intriguing.

The direction is incredibly good, and the acting is stunning, with the step-mother in particular incredibly good swinging from one mood style to another in the film. The large house adds eeriness, and there are enough points in the film where you will jump out of your seat. This film to me clearly shows why Korean cinema is possibly the best most original in the world at the moment. You simply don't get anything like this in the Western World, sadly,and really i can see it being influential on film makers around the world in the next decade.

Highly recommended viewing in my opinion, a real joy and scare...
92 out of 124 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An effective psychological horror drama
Sir_AmirSyarif1 August 2020
Starts off really slow, but it gets weirder and creepier as it goes on. 'A Tale of Two Sisters' is an effective psychological horror drama that works due to its creepy atmosphere, good direction, eerie score, and a committed cast who delivers fabulous inputs in their respective roles.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Masterpiece In A Sea of Faux "Masterpieces"
ebossert21 July 2007
This review is long overdue, since I consider A Tale of Two Sisters to be the single greatest film ever made. I'll put this gem up against any movie in terms of screenplay, cinematography, acting, post-production, editing, directing, or any other aspect of film-making. It's practically perfect in all of them – a true masterpiece in a sea of faux "masterpieces."

The structure of this film is easily the most tightly constructed in the history of cinema. I can think of no other film where something vitally important occurs every other minute. Quite literally, Ji-woon Kim seems to have made a movie that practically taunts the viewer to dissect it on the most detailed of levels. A seemingly insignificant object may be shown – a rack of dresses, two diaries, a drop of blood emanating from a floor crack, a bottle of pills, etc. – but upon meticulous inspection turns out to be so much more – a clue that helps to make sense of that particular scene (or perhaps the movie in total), which almost always contributes a stirring reflection upon the psychological concepts that lurk in the background until the viewer's intelligence prompts them to spring to the forefront. Such an event might occur a handful of times during any other movie, but in A Tale of Two Sisters such events occur in such a rapid-fire, relentless fashion that the viewer must watch the film in a perpetual state of alertness, lest they miss something important. In other words, the content level of this film is enough to easily fill a dozen other films. How can anyone in their right mind ask for anything more from a movie than this? It's quite simply the highest, most superlative form of cinema imaginable.

The most commonly cited criticism of A Tale of Two Sisters is nicely summarized by Zaphod B Goode, who falsely claims that the story is an incoherent, unresolved mess that uses confusion to instill a false sense of intelligence because it does not provide a final set of facts underlying the intriguing questions. He posits that Ji-woon Kim tossed up a dozen possible explanations and left it at that. In reality, however, nothing could be further from the truth. A Tale of Two Sisters provides a series of unassailably objective facts that help the viewer to identify the EXACT occurrences of each and every scene of the film. If our good friend Zaphod had been paying attention, he would have noticed – for example – the series of obvious flashbacks which provide enough factual information to make sense of the film. These flashbacks convincingly contradict Zaphod's assertion of complete subjectivity. The objective elements of A Tale of Two Sisters are so obvious to anyone willing to see them that the mere assertion of a lack of objectivity can only call into question the patience of a viewer who apparently does not want to put forth even the slightest effort whatsoever to see them. Can Ji-woon Kim really be faulted for the impatience of viewers who lack the desire to understand his film? I think not.

Please note that I will not insult the intelligence of critics such as Zaphod that cannot "get" A Tale of Two Sisters, because it really has nothing to do with a lack of intelligence as much as a lack of persistence. The movie spells itself out so effectively that the only possible explanation for confusion is a lack of effort on the part of the viewer. Yes, this film does require a rather significant amount of puzzle-solving, but the pieces fit together to create a beautiful picture. You need only put them together. Remember, the screenplay was written by someone with the picture already in mind – he simply separated the pieces and placed them skillfully throughout for the purpose of providing a magnificent cerebral exercise that – when completed – bestows an ultimate form of satisfaction and state of awe.

Don't misunderstand me. There are films that seem to start with an incomplete picture and try to create a puzzle that is insoluble by design. Spider Forest (2004), Perfect Blue (1998) and Donnie Darko (2001) are perfect examples of this. A Tale of Two Sisters is not. It's ironic that Zaphod claims Darko to be more masterfully constructed than A Tale of Two Sisters, especially considering that Darko not only provides almost NO objective facts but also a twist ending that is the quintessential deus ex machina cliché that could be dropped at the end of any movie ever made in order to provide the ultimate in faux intelligence. I'm ashamed of myself for mentioning the two films in the same sentence, but the contrast is an important one. Although it does perplex me that Zaphod would cite a movie that crumbles when exposed to even the slightest intellectual effort as a way of criticizing a film that only becomes discernible thru a significant application of intellectual effort. He apparently likes his "intelligent" films in the most superficial form possible. This is evident when he makes 17 consecutive questions in his review that are answered quite convincingly by the film itself. Just read the threads by Opiemar within the IMDb A Tale of Two Sisters Discussion Forum. Anyone who carefully reads those threads and still asserts a lack of an objective solution to this film may as well stop watching intelligent films altogether because the answers are so damned OBVIOUS.

I'd like to say more, but I've come to my 1,000 word limit. All that has been said here needed to be said. So be it now said!
101 out of 149 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Depressing Ghost Tale
JoelChamp851 May 2021
I love a good ghost story but there's only so much screaming, crying and depression I can handle before it gets frustrating. The "twist" about the sister is obvious in the first ten minutes, which is fine, except they cheat and make you believe otherwise. There are some alright ghostly elements to the film but nothing to rave about.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Brutally Heartbreaking Tale Of Toxicity Within A Family
ShanTeaTime23 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
A South Korean psychological horror drama film inspired by a Joseon Dynasty era folktale. "A Tale of Two Sisters" focuses on a recently released patient from a mental institution who returns home with her sister, only to face disturbing events between her stepmother and the ghosts haunting their house - all of which are connected to a dark past in the family's history.

I actually saw the American remake of this film called "The Uninvited" first before watching this film. I remember liking the overall premise of that film and wishing that it had been executed better. Welp to my surprise it was indeed a remake and it's original adaptation (ie. this film) was everything I could've hoped for. Psychological horror is my favorite genre and this film does it beautifully, whereas the remake missed the mark. But enough about the remake, let's discuss this film!

So this film is definitely one to watch multiple times in order to fully appreciate it and understand it. I've seen it twice now and watching it after knowing it's twists and turns definitely changes the experience. I love the pacing of this film and the overall tone of melancholy and dread. Much of the film is shot in broad daylight, which actually makes it scarier in my opinion. Since it deals heavily with mental illness it wouldn't make sense for it to do the cliche overwhelming darkness trope.

I've seen people state they feel the movie is "dated looking" now, but I don't really see that at all. Maybe it's cultural differences? But from what has been told to me mental illness was not an open discussion in Korea like it has become in the U.S. It's vastly misunderstood, but the film does the right thing in making you feel intense sympathy for Su-Mi, I was tearing up for her watching this! she's not just painted as crazy. She's just very sick and in denial/self-blame about the situations surrounding that family. I even felt for the father, though infidelity is implied I never felt like he was trying to hurt his daughters. The superb acting (especially from Im Soo-jung) contributes to the layered believability of the film.

There's a lot of visual symbolism in this, it's the type of experience where you can't take everything you're seeing as gospel. Were given a very unreliable narrator/main character, so a lot of it is up for interpretation. Though other parts are very straightforward in what's going on/ what happened. I loved looking at this film and it's beautiful cinematography. There's also the beautiful soundtrack set to it's visuals made the entire experience one that I won't be forgetting. It's easily become one of my favorite Korean films, as well as psychological horror films.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good, but overrated
KALE80828 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
At this point there have been so many reviews of "A Tale of Two Sisters" (ATOTS) here, and so many reveals, that I'm just going to assume you (the reader) know the basic plot twist and then tell you why I was disappointed. The ultimate reveal in this movie is this: Su-mi's real mother committed suicide in an armoire. When Su-mi's younger sister, Su-yeon, found her mom and tried to help her the armoire fell over on her, but she didn't die instantly. She struggled, pinned beneath it, when her the step mother to be, Eun-ju, found her. Eun-ju, who it is suggested was having an affair with the father long before the mom killed herself and did not like the daughters, leaves Su-yeon struggling beneath the amoire. But as she beats a hasty retreat from the room Su-mi catches her (Su-mi doesn't know her beloved sister is just feet away struggling beneath that heavy piece of furniture). Su-mi hates Eun-ju so much that she doesn't see that glimpse of guilt in her eyes over what she just walked away from. Instead, Su-mi engages Eun-ju is some bitter wordplay and the step mom warns her that she will live to regret this moment (we get the feeling the Eun-ju was going to reveal what she saw if Su-mi had played her hand differently).

Later, when Su-mi realizes that she inadvertently caused her sister's death, she goes nuts and is institutionalized. The film starts when Su-mi returns home, with what appears to be her sister Su-yeon. She is greeted by the evil step mom and strange things begin to happen in the house where everything I described transpired. We later realize, Su-mi has created the step mom and the sister in her mind and is replaying fantasy scenarios with them where she can rescue her sister to alleviate the guilt she has for inadvertently letting Su-yeon die. (This was described excellently by the "featured review" here on IMDb.) But there are scenes where this doesn't make sense, and the sister seems to have her own identity (e.g., ghost) and not be a figment of Su-mi's imagination.

I've seen most of the good Asian horror movies: Ringhu, Dark Water, Ringhu 2, Ju-on, etc. The thing I like about these movies is that they are so different from American films in their style and pacing. It's ultimately this difference that allows them to be truly scary. But with ATOTS, the Western influences and legacy of Asian films have left their mark. In short, this film is so busy trying to live up to this canon of films, while borrowing a few nifty tricks from the best of Western psychological thrillers, that is gives off the distinct feeling of being pretentious and trying too hard.

The aforementioned reveal is a very potent piece of story telling (based on a South Korean folk tale that has been remade fives times into a movie). And because the lead character has gone psycho, and the story is told through her eyes, the director has a lot of leeway to concoct stuff under the guise of it being a crumpling psyche. In short, the director had a great premise he could go anywhere with. But instead of paying homage to it and treating it with dignity, he used it to copycat the scares in the best Asian horror films of the last decade and play cutesy with the actors--don't even begin to tell me Yeom Jeong-ah, the actress playing the step mom--was not allowed to chew the scenery channeling the best Asian Nicole Kidman ever). People say you have to see this movie twice to appreciate it, and maybe their right, but based on my initial viewing I can't help but think that at least half the scares had no real purpose or connection to the story; that the director was just abusing the "Su-mi is crazy" theme to invent some cheap thrills.

Technically, the movie is highly accomplished. It looks far and away better than the other Asian horror movies I've seen. But this also detracts from its efficacy. Ringhu benefited from its stark, almost documentary like story telling. This movie is so lush and well shot that you immediately feel the director is trying to manipulate and impress the audience--making his best bid for a big budget American remake.

Overall, certainly not a waste of time. And I will see it again, but right now I'm not nearly as blown away as most of the reviewers here.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Thumbs-Down: Half a "Masterpiece" is no "Masterpiece."
ggulcher16 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I know there are people who are willing to "work with" this movie - I too really, really wanted this to be a great movie, "a masterpiece" as so many are willing to call it, and I think a lot of people gloss over the horrible incoherence of the story precisely because they want so bad for it to be "a masterpiece." But wishing won't change the facts, or as the great lyricist and percussionist Mr. Peart put it: "You can twist perceptions / reality won't budge." And incidentally, I think a review is only as worthwhile as its honesty - I flatly refuse to sugar-coat a lame movie for the sake of "Useful" votes.

I sought this movie out specifically because I'd read a number of reviews talking about a "masterpiece" with "a stunning surprise ending." I have to say it's been a long, long time since I've been this disappointed - no, this utterly disgusted - with a film.

Yes, "Tale of Two Sisters" has a certain sense of style, the cinematography is rich and well-photographed throughout, the acting is very good, the dialog is well done - though certainly not outstanding in any of those elements. The story, unfortunately, is an incoherent, unresolved mess. "Surprise" indeed.

Along with the positive technical aspects listed above, I think the reason people are so willing to shower "Tale of Two Sisters" with the comically-undeserved label of "masterpiece," is the same reason people give historic figures like Kant, Hegel and the like the label of "great thinkers." If you say something nonsensical enough and wrap it up in a slick enough veneer, you will invariably find plenty of people who will be willing to confuse incoherence with profundity. In other words, "I don't understand it, therefore it must be deep." I say: That there emperor is buck nekkid.

An essential requirement of good storytelling is to maintain a solid logical framework no matter what plot twists, misdirections, red herrings or stylistic deceptions you may weave into it. "Tale of Two Sisters" is a game of logical 52-pick-up. It starts with a promising setup but in the midst of the plot-thickening process refuses to lock into a coherent, final set of facts underlying the intriguing questions. Instead the writer tosses half a dozen possible explanations skyward, lets them drop in a random, clattering jumble, then hastily flips out the lights and runs for the door.

Compare this with "Donnie Darko," "The Machinist," or the excellent Hong Kong thrillers "Koma" and "The Eye." In each of these the audience is led through an increasingly-confusing series of events; in each there is a surprise ending that plays off of carefully-constructed misconceptions maintained up to that point. But most importantly, each is a great film because there is one, solid, definite truth beneath all of the deceptive ruses. It is that jarring contrast between the carefully constructed false premises and the actual, final fact, that makes each story work. If instead you leave out that essential, final truth, as does "Tale of Two Sisters," what remains is a meaningless hash of arbitrary possibilities with no reality to anchor them.

It is no accident that there are dozens of "theories" as to what the hell actually happens in "Tale of Two Sisters": The writer and director didn't bother to complete the story.

Put simply, we don't know what really happened, and we never will.

Is the younger sister a ghost? Is the older sister an alter-ego of the stepmother? Why was the older sister in a mental hospital? Or was it both of them? If the younger sister is a ghost, how did she die? Did she get beat to death inside that sack or was that something the older sister imagined? If so, who did it, the older sister or the stepmother? Why? If the younger sister was beat to death in a sack, why is she later shown being killed by a wardrobe containing her mother's body falling on top of her? Is the stepmother a psycho? How much of this happened in the past and how much in the present? How did the mother die? If the stepmother did it, what is the explanation for the two of them living in the same house together? If the father did it, why? Why did the dinner guest's wife go into a violent seizure? Who was the greasy kid she saw under the sink? Why would that ghost happen to appear to someone largely irrelevant to the story? Etc., etc.

The only possible answer to any and all of these questions is: Anybody's guess.

Since there's nothing identified as the final, actual fact, they all remain arbitrary possibilities, and there is no logical thread tying any of it together. The only proper, rational response to arbitrary assertions is: Who cares? A writer bailing out on his responsibility to construct a coherent story is a phenomenon deserving designation not as a "masterpiece" but rather as: contemptible laziness in storytelling.

"Tale of Two Sisters" is a pretty building with no internal framework - it collapses into the void where a solid, logical story with a coherent resolution needed to be. -ZBG
109 out of 202 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed