263 out of 292 people found the following comment useful :- The only problem..., 13 diciembre 2004
Author:
ivko de USA
...is that it ends. This is a fantastic film. It joins the handful of
movies where I think I liked the sequel even more than the original,
although I liked 'Before Sunrise' as well. Where Sunrise captured the
immediacy and urgency of perfect youthful love, Sunset reflects
beautifully on the aftermath of that perfection. I remember a line that
says "nothing that is complete breathes", and I think that is what we
see in this film. A perfect connection with another human is a blessing
and a curse; having experienced perfection a part of us stops
breathing, unable or unwilling to mar the perfection of that memory.
The dialogue is amazing, the acting is spot-on; this is a great film.
In some ways it felt more like reading a great novel than watching a
movie, in that I really felt like I knew the characters and was sad the
movie had to end. Kind of like saying goodbye to an old friend. If you
are an action movie kind of person, skip this flick because it will
bore you to tears. If, on the other hand, you like good dialogue, well
formed characters, and aren't quite jaded enough to have given up
completely on the idea of true love, don't miss this film.
234 out of 249 people found the following comment useful :- Absolutely fantastic. Easily the best film of the year., 19 noviembre 2004
Author:
FilmBuff77
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
There are four scenes that I will treasure forever:
1) The ferry ride, and the subtle ways you can tell they're both
heartbroken, lonely, frustrated and angry. The way she discusses the
"little details" that compose a person, and what she missed most in
him. "Like I remember the way your beard has a bit of red it in, and
how the sun was making it glow that...that morning right before you
left."
2) The scene in the van, where they finally unburden themselves. One of
the most emotionally raw and honest interplays I've seen on celluloid.
The way she reaches out to touch him, but holds back at the last
second. Much different in tone from the way Hawke reached out to brush
her hair aside in the first film.
3) Celine's song. So simple yet so endearing. The way her voice fades
to a whisper as she sings, "My heart will be yours until I die."
4) The ending, which is in all ways **PERFECT**. The slow fade, the
utter charm of her Nina Simone impression, the ambiguity, and the
wonderful look in his eyes as his youth, hope and happiness come
rushing back to him while watching Celine dancing and singing
(foreshadowed in the opening scene). This is, perhaps, one of the ten
best endings in the cinema.
Hawke and Delpy are sublime, of course. This film requires incredibly
subtle acting, and these are Oscar worthy performances that will not be
recognized because they are not showy. Much of this film, like life, is
acted with the eyes. Witness how Hawke stares at Delpy as she discusses
her failed relationships on the ferry, or the sadness and longing in
Delpy's eyes as she sings her love song.
As in the first film, the chemistry between them is indelible. My
candidate for best on-screen couple ever.
This film is better than the first, because it provides a more unique
perspective. In Sunset, we see the sobering effects of age and
disappointment etched in their faces and clouding their lives. There is
more at stake here, for they are nine years older, have made their
share of mistakes, feel imprisoned by responsibilities, and must
confront their shortcomings and problems. It's comforting to believe
that hope and love will prevail in their case.
161 out of 180 people found the following comment useful :- So Little Time, So Much Love., 11 diciembre 2004
Author:
its_a_mee_mario de BC, Canada
Before Sunset is one of those movies, you either love, or you hate.
Personally, I loved it.
Now, I recommend watching "Before Sunrise" first, however it isn't
necessary. Before Sunset does a good job of reviewing what had
happened, therefore if you decide to watch it Before watching "Sunrise"
you have nothing to worry about.
Some scenes are extremely well done. The characters are picture
perfect, and the movie itself, is breathtaking. The aura of the movie
is so spectacular, that it will inspire young directors out there, to
pick up their video cameras are start filming.
An 80 minute movie, about two lovable characters and what they have to
say, may sound boring. But the way it's done in Before Sunset, will
sweep this impression right off your feet.
Julie and Ethan play two of the most honest and true characters I have
ever seen, they are known as Jesse and Celine. And while much of the
credit must go to the characters themselves, you musn't forget the
actor and actress who played them.
Julie is perfect as Celine. The young french actress is so natural in
front of the camera. Definitely, has potential.
Ethan is also very very honest, he seems so comfortable character that
that you forget your watching a movie, and not a home-made video.
Both play with such honest expression, and such trueness, that they are
so natural, Before Sunset becomes no longer a movie. It feels as if you
are eavesdropping on two extremely developed people. It's such an
intimate environment, that you never want to leave.
Before Sunset... 9.901/10*****
149 out of 166 people found the following comment useful :- I'm designed to feel slightly dissatisfied!, 20 noviembre 2004
Author:
Andy (film-critic) de Bookseller of the Blue Ridge
I will be the first to announce that I was not a huge fan of the
original film. While I thought that it was interesting to see as well
as an untapped concept in Hollywood, I felt that the characters were
too forced coupled with a very amateurish and repetitive moments. It
was an average film that seemed to be lacking bits of the human
element. It needed something more. At the time I couldn't put my finger
on it, but after seeing Before Sunset, I could see what it was.
Maturity. This may sound strange, but I felt that Jesse and Celine were
too perfect in the first film. They lacked connectiveness to the
average person. I couldn't see myself in this situation. Perhaps if I
would have seen the original film in 1995 instead of a couple of years
ago, it would have been closer, but I just couldn't capture the moment.
In Before Sunset, I feel head over feet for both Jesse and Celine.
They seemed to have grown and experienced a life that was all their
own. They seemed more passionate, more powerful, and especially more
human. From their first meeting in the bookstore until the finale in
Celine's apartment, I was fully immersed in their conversation. I
wanted to know everything I could about both of them, and I did. I
loved hearing about Celine's passion for the environment, and Jesse's
distraught marriage. It brought these two characters out of the screen
and into our lives. Whether it was a scripted story or if Hawke and
Delpy were playing off each other, it worked. I witnessed in this film
two people who were made for each other. It was more obvious in this
film than in the prior outing.
What made this film work on such a higher level than the first were the
actors. They have grown and emerged as two important commodities in the
Hollywood community. This is probably Hawke's greatest performance in
years. His relaxed actions made us feel relaxed around him, yet quietly
pushing for him to be closer to Celine. His pushy sexual advances
seemed less forced and instead more like honest love. He looked and
felt like a man that has been dreaming of this encounter all his life,
and it finally happened. You could see the excitement in his eyes to
see Delpy again. It was more than just acting, he put so much heart
into this performance that it was clearly displayed for all to see. The
same goes for Delpy. At the beginning of this film, I didn't like her
character. She seemed rough and rigid around the edges, constantly
giving off that feeling that she was harboring a secret that she didn't
want Hawke to know. As her character grew in this film, I understood
why. She had a different life after the encounter than Hawke did. While
he still longed for Celine in his heart, he did move on. She longed for
Jesse in her heart, and to this day could not find anyone to replace
his purity. I loved Celine much more in the sequel because she kept us
guessing. Did she remember their night together? Did she really loose
her grandmother, or did she just not show up that day in Vienna? Was
the song just for Jesse? So many questions left me wanting more and
more and more.
Finally, I would like to say that Linklater is growing with his films,
and this was a crowning achievement for him. He powerfully and
delicately built a sequel that was for superior than the original. He
continued with a similar format as the first, but gave us stronger
characters and another beautiful city. The language in this film is
intense. Listen to the words that come from Ethan and Julie, they
embody so much of our culture and our lives. There were moments when I
felt they were speaking thoughts directly from my mind. Everything in
this film was connected and worked to the fullest extent of cinematic
possibility.
Overall, this was a brilliant film. Linklater captured the essence of
these two heart-struck people and proved that it could be filmed. This
is one of the ultimate love stories that will remain on your minds far
after the film is over. The intimate final lines will continually
reverberate as the best ever in a movie. This was a huge step up from
the original, and is one of the best films of the year. If you were not
a fan of the Before Sunset, I suggest that you check this out. It is a
mature film that explores the power of love in a way that no other
Hollywood film could. I would not be surprised if we saw the title of
this film in the Oscar celebration this year. Check out this film to
hear social commentary of our lives, fall in love, and especially to
see the beauty of Paris.
Grade: ***** out of *****
147 out of 183 people found the following comment useful :- Watch to remember, 20 diciembre 2004
Author:
joedamato-1 (joedamato@mail.ru) de Yerevan, Armenia
Not a movie but life. Amazingly simple and deep! They were in love 9
years ago. Now when they've met again, there's a lot to remember and
tell each other. Jess (Ethan Hawke) is already married and more he's
a father and Celine's dating a guy she really loves who's fortunately
out of town right now. At least this is what they tell each other. You
see, some parts are really left to our imagination. Perhaps Celine's
just trying to prove she's a strong girl to live without Jess saying
she has had many lovers after him and each of them after getting
married said "thank you" to her for "teaching love" as she says.
Perhaps Jess lies either about kids but his marriage and Julie's new
love are probably true. The question is could they refuse all that for
each other. And here imagination's again switched on how can they be
sure they really should do it. I mean 9 years is a long term, taking
into account they didn't really get known each other in the past.
Depends on what you'd like everything to turn out. From the very
beginning we don't even hope they'll do anything but cup of coffee
together because Jess usually watches the time not to miss the plane.
At first they behave just like friends, realize very soon what they
really need from each other and later regret they couldn't get in touch
all that time. In the end we're almost sure they'll make love at least,
but for a movie without a single kiss-scene it'll be over before the
culmination starts. The ending is specific like the whole movie and
everything in it. It's a movie about the human being you're married
with is not necessarily to be the one you are really in love with. Nice
to watch if you miss somebody. Well, nice anyway. Imagination required!
If you want to believe they've really been dreaming of each other all
these years, believe love's the strongest thing, you have the
opportunity here. End it using your own discretion. The film is not
much of humor but it gives good mood. The best thing is we'll see here
a photo of Julie's childhood. You must see this. Even if you're not in
love yet, you'll want to be. Highly recommended! 10 out of 10
73 out of 82 people found the following comment useful :- Suave sequel: a new genre is born, 30 julio 2004
Author:
Chris Knipp de Berkeley, California
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
"Before Sunset" is one of those movies that look superficial, romantic,
weepy, crowd-pleasing, but really is original, smart, analytical, and
challenging. It stands by itself but is richer seen in relation to
"Before Sunrise," made nine years earlier, of which it is the sequel,
and besides that it's richer and subtler than the original. The
characters and the actors are older, more experienced and more
sophisticated. It's got a documentary element, reminiscent of Michael
Apted's wonderful "7 Up," "14 Up," series. Julie Delpy and Ethan Hawke,
who also stared in "Before Sunrise," don't have to pretend to be nine
years older in this sequel; they are. They're only thirty-three now,
but Hawke has the ravaged gauntness his breakup with Uma Thurman seems
to have imposed on him. Delpy is more mature, less angelic, more
businesslike, but still beautiful.
"Before Sunset" is a leaner film than "Before Sunrise." It's real-time,
and without frills. Venues or backgrounds are simpler. Jesse and Céline
largely just walk and talk.
Hawke and Delpy are more accomplished actors; less self-conscious
people. The talk flows more effortlessly. The continuity of the scenes
is a seamless tour de fource almost as if this were all a single take
like Sokorov's "Russian Ark."
There isn't flirting or a developing attraction, a growing physical
intimacy, as in "Before Sunset," because Jesse and Céline spend most of
the film talking about that earlier meeting and how it has haunted them
and dominated their lives. Gradually it comes out (particularly during
the car ride that leads to where Céline lives) that her current
relationship is limited and his marriage is largely sexless, redeemed
only by his adoration of his four-year-old son.
She pretends not to remember that they made love that night in Vienna
nine years before. Maybe that means their sudden passion never really
was consummated, because their affinity wasn't something one night's
sex could fulfill.
The premise is this: Jesse has published a novel that's a bestseller in
the US and he's doing a signing in Paris. (Hawke's real life identity
fits here, since he's published several books.) Suddenly as he's coming
to the end of his talk, Céline appears outside the window of the
bookstore (which is one every American in Paris knows: Shakespeare &
Company). He's supposed to go to the airport in a couple of hours, but
his bags are packed and a car is ready, and he and Céline agree to go
and talk. She leads him to a café called Le Pure. (This is real time,
but not real space: the places where they go are far apart.) Then they
take a boat ride on the Seine; finally they get in the car and wind up
at Céline's apartment which turns out to be a lovely enclave where her
neighbors are together outside having a party.
A movie in real time consisting mostly of conversation is impossible to
summarize: it would take twenty pages. But it does emerge that both
still think about each other a lot; that meeting nine years before has
remained important. The flame still burns bright. Jesse did go back to
Vienna six months later in the station to meet Céline as they'd
promised, but her grandmother was buried on that day and she couldn't
be there. Later he says that perhaps his dream of romantic love was
shattered forever by her failure to appear. They rue the fact that they
didn't exchange addresses or phone numbers.
There's little touching or kissing but there doesn't have to be. It's
obvious that this is a climactic reunion for both of them and the
attraction is as strong as ever, probably stronger except that there
are obstacles. They're not young and free any more. They have lives,
commitments, involvements. . .
What will happen? As the film ends, its obvious Jessie is quite happily
going to miss his plane. But while Linklater & Company keep us
guessing, the partial answer that comes is quite charming.
"Before Sunset" is a superb sequel. It's touching but surprisingly
unsentimental. And it's as graceful a piece of film-making as you could
ever see, with the gracefulness of art that conceals artifice. Richard
Linklater is one of the most interesting younger American directors.
His work is authentic and personal, but has real range, from the
slacker movies through the romantic encounters of Delpy and Hawke and
the tight theatrical drama "Tape" to the inspired philosophical musings
and fresh use of animation of "Waking Life," and Hawke has been
involved in four of Linklater's movies. Linklater and Hawke are
soulmates and brothers, and Delpy is the other essential collaborator
in the "Sunset"/"Sunrise" sequence, because she too is a writer and
wrote her own dialogue and the chemistry between Hawke and Delpy is too
obvious to mention. It's obvious also the audience would like another
sequel, and so would the actors. It's only a question of when. The
inventive Richard Linklater has created a new genre: the real time
sequel.
A sequel to the 1995 film "Before Sunrise". Jesse (Ethan Hawke) and
Celine (Julie Delpy) meet 9 years after their initial meeting. They've
changed--originally they were in their 20s and full of idealism. Now
they're in their 30s--and their lives have changed in ways they didn't
predict. Like the first movie they walk around Paris this time and talk about love, life, reality, what
might have been--and it's all fascinating. Like the first film this is
basically a character study and (like the first) just incredible. It's
like catching up with old friends after 9 years apart! They've aged a
lot--Hawke looks TERRIBLE but Delpy looks OK--and life has thrown both
a few hard knocks but hearing how they survived and what they went
through is just incredible.
This is NOT for everybody (four people walked out when I went to see
it) but, for people who can deal with nonstop talk for 80 minutes it is
just great. Every single line rings true and is delivered full force by
Hawke and Delpy. The acting varies--Hawke is good (but he smiles WAY
too much)--Delpy is just superb all the way through.
This is easily one of the best films of 2004. Highly recommended.
70 out of 81 people found the following comment useful :- How do you make a sequel to "Before Sunrise"? This is how., 29 octubre 2004
Author:
Rashtabullah
I'd been longing to see this one as I'd always thought 'Before Sunrise'
was one of the most honest, most real films I'd ever seen, but at the
same time I held off seeing the sequel from fear of disappointment. For
all of you in the same position, fear not ; Linklater, Hawke and Delphy
(for it has surely been a joint effort and labour of love for all
three) have done us and themselves proud. I've just seen the film and
despite being male and 38 I feel like Roberta Flack must have felt when
she penned 'Killing me Softly' after hearing Don McLean sing 'Vincent'
in concert; this is - once again - just so close to what it's all
about. You want technicalities? The acting, superb; Hawke and Delphy
slip right back into their characters, their mannerisms, their
sometimes gauche repartee, the way they seem to fence around each
other, seeming to go in for the kill then feigning, drawing
back Exquisite. And then the details, the echoes of the first film in
the settings but now with a world-weariness, an autumnal note and yet
with still that fundamental freshness and optimism that revives the
memories of Sunrise's youthfulness and reminds us, as our heroes
discuss, that though time changes people, there remains an unchanging
core. Just see it; this is about as good as it gets, folks.
67 out of 77 people found the following comment useful :- Linklater, Delpy & Hawke make an impossible sequel work (including minor SPOILERS), 19 junio 2004
Author:
Superunknovvn de Austria, Vienna
"Before Sunrise" was one of the most beautiful independent love stories
of the 90's. Part of its appeal came from the open ending. We didn't
know how the lives of these two young people would continue and what
would become of them. The whole movie was like a snapshot that left the
rest to your imagination. A sequel to such a story seemed to be
unnecessary, but apparently director Richard Linklater himself couldn't
stop thinking about these two intriguing characters and had to envision
their lives after this one fateful day in Vienna.
Here it is now, the most unlikely sequel I have ever seen, "Before
Sunset" - made not for money but for pure artistic purpose only. Much
of the magic of part one could have been destroyed, but somehow
Linklater and his two main actors managed to pull it off. "Before
Sunset" takes place nine years after Jesse and Celine first met and as
soon as the movie starts you feel like you meet old friends you haven't
seen in a long time. You really know these people and immediately feel
at home with them. I was afraid that "Before Sunset" might give answers
to questions that shouldn't be answered in the first place. If "Before
Sunrise" was a dream that two young people had, then this movie could
only be the rude awakening, the confrontation with reality. And somehow
it is just that. It's a bit disillusioning to hear that all did not
turn out as well as one might have imagined. We learn that Jesse and
Celine are not particularly happy in their lives and that they are not
really the romantic persons they used to be nine years ago. The
soothing thing to see, however, is that they are still here. They both
have passed their 30th birthday, they have jobs and their future is
more or less decided, but they're still longing for passion in their
lives and as soon as they meet each other, it's there again. They might
have given up a lot of their dreams and beliefs but one thing remains
true: their feelings for each other. While they're talking it's like
they turn back time and become the young, hopeful people they once were
again. I'm getting a bit carried away, but that's the beauty of these
two movies, "Sunrise" and "Sunset". The story sucks you in and you're
not able to stop thinking about it for a long while.
Another thing "Before Sunset" did to me was that it made me reflect on
my own life. How have I changed in the past nine years? What has become
of my dreams? Obviously, I have gotten more cynical, because I
sometimes was irritated by Celine's talk about environmental problems
and her emotional outbursts. It took me way longer than last time to
get into the story.
Anyway, Hawke and Delpy are wonderful once again. They're acting as
natural as they can, and thinking of Hawke's recent divorce in real
life you wonder how much of his character in the movie is based on his
own experiences.
Unfortunately, the movie is over way too soon and after about an hour
you have already arrived at the final scene. A scene that is just
amazing. It makes you hope that somehow everything will work out for
Jesse and Celine and that maybe they will stay together this time. As
part one, "Before Sunset" doesn't have a definite ending, though. It
leaves the rest to your imagination. It's sure nice to see that
apparently Linklater cares about Jesse and Celine as much as I do and
made such a good sequel. He could probably even make a third part.
"Before Sunset" has convinced me that it could work.
59 out of 62 people found the following comment useful :- Wow! Satisfying at so many levels, 14 agosto 2004
Author:
Bob Pr. de Topeka, KS
I had not seen the prequel to this although my date had and she filled me in
on many details. While the experience of this film would be enriched by
having seen the preceding film first, it certainly stands satisfactorily
alone.
In many ways, this reminded me very much of one of my most favorite movies
of all time, "My Dinner with André," in which just 2 characters talking
comprised the whole movie. In that movie, the friends had been close,
drifted apart, and then had a brief reunion at a dinner at which they caught
up with what the other had been doing. The two principals, André Gregory
and Wallace Shawn, played themselves and each represented a one side of a
dialectic, say the side of romanticism vs. a conventional reality. "Before
Sunset" is parallel in many ways.
At one level we have a romantic story -- two people who'd briefly been
lovers nine years before and lost touch meet again. They spend an afternoon
together. Will they try to fulfill what they'd started?
At another level, we have the charm of conversation and exploration, of
reminiscing, of gradually feeling out and discovery of how much do I have in
common with this person now? -- where has this person been? -- what are they
capable of now? -- how much freedom of choice do I have, does this other
person have -- to make decisions? Etc.
While Celine and Jesse have a capacity for relating and talking, they also
have somewhat opposite ways of viewing the world and relationships -- Celine
is more cynical and reserved; Jesse is more open to settling for the
"not-perfect-but-good-enough."
There are possibly a few people who have not had the personal experiences
that at least somewhat relate to the premise in this film -- a relationship
in which one wonders, "what would have happened if I'd pursued that
relation?" but probably most people have. And the other dilemma, of meeting
again that someone but by now being involved in relationships of
responsibility -- my family, my children, my present life. What would it do
to them if I were to pursue my own happiness at the expense of them? Can I
do that? Can I value the chance of my own happiness above theirs? Etc.
The film, fortunately, gives us no answers to these essential questions but
it does pose them in a way that makes us consider them.
Delpy and Hawke are given screenwriter credits and I feel sure that they
must've contributed a great deal to the feeling of seamless, natural
dialogue.
GREAT movie. No movie satisfies everyone, of course, but at the time I wrote
this, slightly over 50% of the voters gave it a 10/10. For those of us in
that group, it's a great film.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosreparto y equipo completostrivialidadesofficial sitesfrases célebresOverview
información principalinformación combinadareparto y equipo completoscréditos de compañíastv schedulePremios y críticas
comentarios de los usuarioscríticas externascríticas de grupos de usuariosawardsCalificacionesparents guiderecomendacionesmessage boardArgumento y citas
argumentoplot synopsispalabras clave del argumentosinopsis Amazon.comfrases célebresCosas divertidas
trivialidadespifiastemas musicalescréditos extravagantesotras versionesenlaces entre películaspreguntas frecuentesOtro tipo de información
enlaces a productosbox office/businessfechas de estrenolugares de rodajeespecificaciones técnicasLaserdiscDVDlecturas relacionadasNewsDeskMaterial promocional
frases comerciales trailers and videos carteles y enlaces photo galleryEnlaces externos
enlaces a cinesofficial sitesmisceláneosfotografíassound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Before Sunset (2004)
263 out of 292 people found the following comment useful :-

The only problem..., 13 diciembre 2004
Author: ivko de USA
...is that it ends. This is a fantastic film. It joins the handful of movies where I think I liked the sequel even more than the original, although I liked 'Before Sunrise' as well. Where Sunrise captured the immediacy and urgency of perfect youthful love, Sunset reflects beautifully on the aftermath of that perfection. I remember a line that says "nothing that is complete breathes", and I think that is what we see in this film. A perfect connection with another human is a blessing and a curse; having experienced perfection a part of us stops breathing, unable or unwilling to mar the perfection of that memory.
The dialogue is amazing, the acting is spot-on; this is a great film. In some ways it felt more like reading a great novel than watching a movie, in that I really felt like I knew the characters and was sad the movie had to end. Kind of like saying goodbye to an old friend. If you are an action movie kind of person, skip this flick because it will bore you to tears. If, on the other hand, you like good dialogue, well formed characters, and aren't quite jaded enough to have given up completely on the idea of true love, don't miss this film.
234 out of 249 people found the following comment useful :-

Absolutely fantastic. Easily the best film of the year., 19 noviembre 2004
Author: FilmBuff77
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
There are four scenes that I will treasure forever:
1) The ferry ride, and the subtle ways you can tell they're both heartbroken, lonely, frustrated and angry. The way she discusses the "little details" that compose a person, and what she missed most in him. "Like I remember the way your beard has a bit of red it in, and how the sun was making it glow that...that morning right before you left."
2) The scene in the van, where they finally unburden themselves. One of the most emotionally raw and honest interplays I've seen on celluloid. The way she reaches out to touch him, but holds back at the last second. Much different in tone from the way Hawke reached out to brush her hair aside in the first film.
3) Celine's song. So simple yet so endearing. The way her voice fades to a whisper as she sings, "My heart will be yours until I die."
4) The ending, which is in all ways **PERFECT**. The slow fade, the utter charm of her Nina Simone impression, the ambiguity, and the wonderful look in his eyes as his youth, hope and happiness come rushing back to him while watching Celine dancing and singing (foreshadowed in the opening scene). This is, perhaps, one of the ten best endings in the cinema.
Hawke and Delpy are sublime, of course. This film requires incredibly subtle acting, and these are Oscar worthy performances that will not be recognized because they are not showy. Much of this film, like life, is acted with the eyes. Witness how Hawke stares at Delpy as she discusses her failed relationships on the ferry, or the sadness and longing in Delpy's eyes as she sings her love song.
As in the first film, the chemistry between them is indelible. My candidate for best on-screen couple ever.
This film is better than the first, because it provides a more unique perspective. In Sunset, we see the sobering effects of age and disappointment etched in their faces and clouding their lives. There is more at stake here, for they are nine years older, have made their share of mistakes, feel imprisoned by responsibilities, and must confront their shortcomings and problems. It's comforting to believe that hope and love will prevail in their case.
161 out of 180 people found the following comment useful :-

So Little Time, So Much Love., 11 diciembre 2004
Author: its_a_mee_mario de BC, Canada
Before Sunset is one of those movies, you either love, or you hate.
Personally, I loved it.
Now, I recommend watching "Before Sunrise" first, however it isn't necessary. Before Sunset does a good job of reviewing what had happened, therefore if you decide to watch it Before watching "Sunrise" you have nothing to worry about.
Some scenes are extremely well done. The characters are picture perfect, and the movie itself, is breathtaking. The aura of the movie is so spectacular, that it will inspire young directors out there, to pick up their video cameras are start filming.
An 80 minute movie, about two lovable characters and what they have to say, may sound boring. But the way it's done in Before Sunset, will sweep this impression right off your feet.
Julie and Ethan play two of the most honest and true characters I have ever seen, they are known as Jesse and Celine. And while much of the credit must go to the characters themselves, you musn't forget the actor and actress who played them.
Julie is perfect as Celine. The young french actress is so natural in front of the camera. Definitely, has potential.
Ethan is also very very honest, he seems so comfortable character that that you forget your watching a movie, and not a home-made video.
Both play with such honest expression, and such trueness, that they are so natural, Before Sunset becomes no longer a movie. It feels as if you are eavesdropping on two extremely developed people. It's such an intimate environment, that you never want to leave.
Before Sunset... 9.901/10*****
149 out of 166 people found the following comment useful :-

I'm designed to feel slightly dissatisfied!, 20 noviembre 2004
Author: Andy (film-critic) de Bookseller of the Blue Ridge
I will be the first to announce that I was not a huge fan of the original film. While I thought that it was interesting to see as well as an untapped concept in Hollywood, I felt that the characters were too forced coupled with a very amateurish and repetitive moments. It was an average film that seemed to be lacking bits of the human element. It needed something more. At the time I couldn't put my finger on it, but after seeing Before Sunset, I could see what it was. Maturity. This may sound strange, but I felt that Jesse and Celine were too perfect in the first film. They lacked connectiveness to the average person. I couldn't see myself in this situation. Perhaps if I would have seen the original film in 1995 instead of a couple of years ago, it would have been closer, but I just couldn't capture the moment. In Before Sunset, I feel head over feet for both Jesse and Celine.
They seemed to have grown and experienced a life that was all their own. They seemed more passionate, more powerful, and especially more human. From their first meeting in the bookstore until the finale in Celine's apartment, I was fully immersed in their conversation. I wanted to know everything I could about both of them, and I did. I loved hearing about Celine's passion for the environment, and Jesse's distraught marriage. It brought these two characters out of the screen and into our lives. Whether it was a scripted story or if Hawke and Delpy were playing off each other, it worked. I witnessed in this film two people who were made for each other. It was more obvious in this film than in the prior outing.
What made this film work on such a higher level than the first were the actors. They have grown and emerged as two important commodities in the Hollywood community. This is probably Hawke's greatest performance in years. His relaxed actions made us feel relaxed around him, yet quietly pushing for him to be closer to Celine. His pushy sexual advances seemed less forced and instead more like honest love. He looked and felt like a man that has been dreaming of this encounter all his life, and it finally happened. You could see the excitement in his eyes to see Delpy again. It was more than just acting, he put so much heart into this performance that it was clearly displayed for all to see. The same goes for Delpy. At the beginning of this film, I didn't like her character. She seemed rough and rigid around the edges, constantly giving off that feeling that she was harboring a secret that she didn't want Hawke to know. As her character grew in this film, I understood why. She had a different life after the encounter than Hawke did. While he still longed for Celine in his heart, he did move on. She longed for Jesse in her heart, and to this day could not find anyone to replace his purity. I loved Celine much more in the sequel because she kept us guessing. Did she remember their night together? Did she really loose her grandmother, or did she just not show up that day in Vienna? Was the song just for Jesse? So many questions left me wanting more and more and more.
Finally, I would like to say that Linklater is growing with his films, and this was a crowning achievement for him. He powerfully and delicately built a sequel that was for superior than the original. He continued with a similar format as the first, but gave us stronger characters and another beautiful city. The language in this film is intense. Listen to the words that come from Ethan and Julie, they embody so much of our culture and our lives. There were moments when I felt they were speaking thoughts directly from my mind. Everything in this film was connected and worked to the fullest extent of cinematic possibility.
Overall, this was a brilliant film. Linklater captured the essence of these two heart-struck people and proved that it could be filmed. This is one of the ultimate love stories that will remain on your minds far after the film is over. The intimate final lines will continually reverberate as the best ever in a movie. This was a huge step up from the original, and is one of the best films of the year. If you were not a fan of the Before Sunset, I suggest that you check this out. It is a mature film that explores the power of love in a way that no other Hollywood film could. I would not be surprised if we saw the title of this film in the Oscar celebration this year. Check out this film to hear social commentary of our lives, fall in love, and especially to see the beauty of Paris.
Grade: ***** out of *****
147 out of 183 people found the following comment useful :-

Watch to remember, 20 diciembre 2004
Author: joedamato-1 (joedamato@mail.ru) de Yerevan, Armenia
Not a movie but life. Amazingly simple and deep! They were in love 9 years ago. Now when they've met again, there's a lot to remember and tell each other. Jess (Ethan Hawke) is already married and more he's a father and Celine's dating a guy she really loves who's fortunately out of town right now. At least this is what they tell each other. You see, some parts are really left to our imagination. Perhaps Celine's just trying to prove she's a strong girl to live without Jess saying she has had many lovers after him and each of them after getting married said "thank you" to her for "teaching love" as she says. Perhaps Jess lies either about kids but his marriage and Julie's new love are probably true. The question is could they refuse all that for each other. And here imagination's again switched on how can they be sure they really should do it. I mean 9 years is a long term, taking into account they didn't really get known each other in the past. Depends on what you'd like everything to turn out. From the very beginning we don't even hope they'll do anything but cup of coffee together because Jess usually watches the time not to miss the plane. At first they behave just like friends, realize very soon what they really need from each other and later regret they couldn't get in touch all that time. In the end we're almost sure they'll make love at least, but for a movie without a single kiss-scene it'll be over before the culmination starts. The ending is specific like the whole movie and everything in it. It's a movie about the human being you're married with is not necessarily to be the one you are really in love with. Nice to watch if you miss somebody. Well, nice anyway. Imagination required! If you want to believe they've really been dreaming of each other all these years, believe love's the strongest thing, you have the opportunity here. End it using your own discretion. The film is not much of humor but it gives good mood. The best thing is we'll see here a photo of Julie's childhood. You must see this. Even if you're not in love yet, you'll want to be. Highly recommended! 10 out of 10
73 out of 82 people found the following comment useful :-
Suave sequel: a new genre is born, 30 julio 2004
Author: Chris Knipp de Berkeley, California
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
"Before Sunset" is one of those movies that look superficial, romantic, weepy, crowd-pleasing, but really is original, smart, analytical, and challenging. It stands by itself but is richer seen in relation to "Before Sunrise," made nine years earlier, of which it is the sequel, and besides that it's richer and subtler than the original. The characters and the actors are older, more experienced and more sophisticated. It's got a documentary element, reminiscent of Michael Apted's wonderful "7 Up," "14 Up," series. Julie Delpy and Ethan Hawke, who also stared in "Before Sunrise," don't have to pretend to be nine years older in this sequel; they are. They're only thirty-three now, but Hawke has the ravaged gauntness his breakup with Uma Thurman seems to have imposed on him. Delpy is more mature, less angelic, more businesslike, but still beautiful.
"Before Sunset" is a leaner film than "Before Sunrise." It's real-time, and without frills. Venues or backgrounds are simpler. Jesse and Céline largely just walk and talk.
Hawke and Delpy are more accomplished actors; less self-conscious people. The talk flows more effortlessly. The continuity of the scenes is a seamless tour de fource almost as if this were all a single take like Sokorov's "Russian Ark."
There isn't flirting or a developing attraction, a growing physical intimacy, as in "Before Sunset," because Jesse and Céline spend most of the film talking about that earlier meeting and how it has haunted them and dominated their lives. Gradually it comes out (particularly during the car ride that leads to where Céline lives) that her current relationship is limited and his marriage is largely sexless, redeemed only by his adoration of his four-year-old son.
She pretends not to remember that they made love that night in Vienna nine years before. Maybe that means their sudden passion never really was consummated, because their affinity wasn't something one night's sex could fulfill.
The premise is this: Jesse has published a novel that's a bestseller in the US and he's doing a signing in Paris. (Hawke's real life identity fits here, since he's published several books.) Suddenly as he's coming to the end of his talk, Céline appears outside the window of the bookstore (which is one every American in Paris knows: Shakespeare & Company). He's supposed to go to the airport in a couple of hours, but his bags are packed and a car is ready, and he and Céline agree to go and talk. She leads him to a café called Le Pure. (This is real time, but not real space: the places where they go are far apart.) Then they take a boat ride on the Seine; finally they get in the car and wind up at Céline's apartment which turns out to be a lovely enclave where her neighbors are together outside having a party.
A movie in real time consisting mostly of conversation is impossible to summarize: it would take twenty pages. But it does emerge that both still think about each other a lot; that meeting nine years before has remained important. The flame still burns bright. Jesse did go back to Vienna six months later in the station to meet Céline as they'd promised, but her grandmother was buried on that day and she couldn't be there. Later he says that perhaps his dream of romantic love was shattered forever by her failure to appear. They rue the fact that they didn't exchange addresses or phone numbers.
There's little touching or kissing but there doesn't have to be. It's obvious that this is a climactic reunion for both of them and the attraction is as strong as ever, probably stronger except that there are obstacles. They're not young and free any more. They have lives, commitments, involvements. . .
What will happen? As the film ends, its obvious Jessie is quite happily going to miss his plane. But while Linklater & Company keep us guessing, the partial answer that comes is quite charming.
"Before Sunset" is a superb sequel. It's touching but surprisingly unsentimental. And it's as graceful a piece of film-making as you could ever see, with the gracefulness of art that conceals artifice. Richard Linklater is one of the most interesting younger American directors. His work is authentic and personal, but has real range, from the slacker movies through the romantic encounters of Delpy and Hawke and the tight theatrical drama "Tape" to the inspired philosophical musings and fresh use of animation of "Waking Life," and Hawke has been involved in four of Linklater's movies. Linklater and Hawke are soulmates and brothers, and Delpy is the other essential collaborator in the "Sunset"/"Sunrise" sequence, because she too is a writer and wrote her own dialogue and the chemistry between Hawke and Delpy is too obvious to mention. It's obvious also the audience would like another sequel, and so would the actors. It's only a question of when. The inventive Richard Linklater has created a new genre: the real time sequel.
79 out of 98 people found the following comment useful :-

Just great, 16 julio 2004
Author: Wayne Malin (wwaayynnee51@hotmail.com) de United States
A sequel to the 1995 film "Before Sunrise". Jesse (Ethan Hawke) and Celine (Julie Delpy) meet 9 years after their initial meeting. They've changed--originally they were in their 20s and full of idealism. Now they're in their 30s--and their lives have changed in ways they didn't predict. Like the first movie they walk around Paris this time and talk about love, life, reality, what might have been--and it's all fascinating. Like the first film this is basically a character study and (like the first) just incredible. It's like catching up with old friends after 9 years apart! They've aged a lot--Hawke looks TERRIBLE but Delpy looks OK--and life has thrown both a few hard knocks but hearing how they survived and what they went through is just incredible. This is NOT for everybody (four people walked out when I went to see it) but, for people who can deal with nonstop talk for 80 minutes it is just great. Every single line rings true and is delivered full force by Hawke and Delpy. The acting varies--Hawke is good (but he smiles WAY too much)--Delpy is just superb all the way through. This is easily one of the best films of 2004. Highly recommended.
70 out of 81 people found the following comment useful :-

How do you make a sequel to "Before Sunrise"? This is how., 29 octubre 2004
Author: Rashtabullah
I'd been longing to see this one as I'd always thought 'Before Sunrise' was one of the most honest, most real films I'd ever seen, but at the same time I held off seeing the sequel from fear of disappointment. For all of you in the same position, fear not ; Linklater, Hawke and Delphy (for it has surely been a joint effort and labour of love for all three) have done us and themselves proud. I've just seen the film and despite being male and 38 I feel like Roberta Flack must have felt when she penned 'Killing me Softly' after hearing Don McLean sing 'Vincent' in concert; this is - once again - just so close to what it's all about. You want technicalities? The acting, superb; Hawke and Delphy slip right back into their characters, their mannerisms, their sometimes gauche repartee, the way they seem to fence around each other, seeming to go in for the kill then feigning, drawing back Exquisite. And then the details, the echoes of the first film in the settings but now with a world-weariness, an autumnal note and yet with still that fundamental freshness and optimism that revives the memories of Sunrise's youthfulness and reminds us, as our heroes discuss, that though time changes people, there remains an unchanging core. Just see it; this is about as good as it gets, folks.
67 out of 77 people found the following comment useful :-

Linklater, Delpy & Hawke make an impossible sequel work (including minor SPOILERS), 19 junio 2004
Author: Superunknovvn de Austria, Vienna
"Before Sunrise" was one of the most beautiful independent love stories of the 90's. Part of its appeal came from the open ending. We didn't know how the lives of these two young people would continue and what would become of them. The whole movie was like a snapshot that left the rest to your imagination. A sequel to such a story seemed to be unnecessary, but apparently director Richard Linklater himself couldn't stop thinking about these two intriguing characters and had to envision their lives after this one fateful day in Vienna.
Here it is now, the most unlikely sequel I have ever seen, "Before Sunset" - made not for money but for pure artistic purpose only. Much of the magic of part one could have been destroyed, but somehow Linklater and his two main actors managed to pull it off. "Before Sunset" takes place nine years after Jesse and Celine first met and as soon as the movie starts you feel like you meet old friends you haven't seen in a long time. You really know these people and immediately feel at home with them. I was afraid that "Before Sunset" might give answers to questions that shouldn't be answered in the first place. If "Before Sunrise" was a dream that two young people had, then this movie could only be the rude awakening, the confrontation with reality. And somehow it is just that. It's a bit disillusioning to hear that all did not turn out as well as one might have imagined. We learn that Jesse and Celine are not particularly happy in their lives and that they are not really the romantic persons they used to be nine years ago. The soothing thing to see, however, is that they are still here. They both have passed their 30th birthday, they have jobs and their future is more or less decided, but they're still longing for passion in their lives and as soon as they meet each other, it's there again. They might have given up a lot of their dreams and beliefs but one thing remains true: their feelings for each other. While they're talking it's like they turn back time and become the young, hopeful people they once were again. I'm getting a bit carried away, but that's the beauty of these two movies, "Sunrise" and "Sunset". The story sucks you in and you're not able to stop thinking about it for a long while.
Another thing "Before Sunset" did to me was that it made me reflect on my own life. How have I changed in the past nine years? What has become of my dreams? Obviously, I have gotten more cynical, because I sometimes was irritated by Celine's talk about environmental problems and her emotional outbursts. It took me way longer than last time to get into the story.
Anyway, Hawke and Delpy are wonderful once again. They're acting as natural as they can, and thinking of Hawke's recent divorce in real life you wonder how much of his character in the movie is based on his own experiences.
Unfortunately, the movie is over way too soon and after about an hour you have already arrived at the final scene. A scene that is just amazing. It makes you hope that somehow everything will work out for Jesse and Celine and that maybe they will stay together this time. As part one, "Before Sunset" doesn't have a definite ending, though. It leaves the rest to your imagination. It's sure nice to see that apparently Linklater cares about Jesse and Celine as much as I do and made such a good sequel. He could probably even make a third part. "Before Sunset" has convinced me that it could work.
59 out of 62 people found the following comment useful :-

Wow! Satisfying at so many levels, 14 agosto 2004
Author: Bob Pr. de Topeka, KS
I had not seen the prequel to this although my date had and she filled me in on many details. While the experience of this film would be enriched by having seen the preceding film first, it certainly stands satisfactorily alone.
In many ways, this reminded me very much of one of my most favorite movies of all time, "My Dinner with André," in which just 2 characters talking comprised the whole movie. In that movie, the friends had been close, drifted apart, and then had a brief reunion at a dinner at which they caught up with what the other had been doing. The two principals, André Gregory and Wallace Shawn, played themselves and each represented a one side of a dialectic, say the side of romanticism vs. a conventional reality. "Before Sunset" is parallel in many ways.
At one level we have a romantic story -- two people who'd briefly been lovers nine years before and lost touch meet again. They spend an afternoon together. Will they try to fulfill what they'd started?
At another level, we have the charm of conversation and exploration, of reminiscing, of gradually feeling out and discovery of how much do I have in common with this person now? -- where has this person been? -- what are they capable of now? -- how much freedom of choice do I have, does this other person have -- to make decisions? Etc.
While Celine and Jesse have a capacity for relating and talking, they also have somewhat opposite ways of viewing the world and relationships -- Celine is more cynical and reserved; Jesse is more open to settling for the "not-perfect-but-good-enough." There are possibly a few people who have not had the personal experiences that at least somewhat relate to the premise in this film -- a relationship in which one wonders, "what would have happened if I'd pursued that relation?" but probably most people have. And the other dilemma, of meeting again that someone but by now being involved in relationships of responsibility -- my family, my children, my present life. What would it do to them if I were to pursue my own happiness at the expense of them? Can I do that? Can I value the chance of my own happiness above theirs? Etc.
The film, fortunately, gives us no answers to these essential questions but it does pose them in a way that makes us consider them.
Delpy and Hawke are given screenwriter credits and I feel sure that they must've contributed a great deal to the feeling of seamless, natural dialogue.
GREAT movie. No movie satisfies everyone, of course, but at the time I wrote this, slightly over 50% of the voters gave it a 10/10. For those of us in that group, it's a great film.
Add another comment
Related Links