10,000 BC (2008)

Director:

Roland Emmerich

Writers (WGA):

Roland Emmerich (written by) &
Harald Kloser (written by)

Release Date:

7 marzo 2008 (USA)

Genre:

Adventure | Romance

Frase comercial:

It takes a hero to change the world.

Plot:

A prehistoric epic that follows a young mammoth hunter's journey through uncharted territory to secure the future of his tribe.

Plot Keywords:

Pyramid | Male Female Relationship | Rainstorm | Prophecy | Revolt

Comentarios de los usuarios:

For the love of God!

Cast

Steven Strait	...	D'Leh
Camilla Belle	...	Evolet
Cliff Curtis	...	Tic'Tic
Joel Virgel	...	Nakudu
Affif Ben Badra	...	Warlord (as Ben Badra)
Mo Zinal	...	Ka'Ren (as Mo Zainal)
Nathanael Baring	...	Baku
Mona Hammond	...	Old Mother
Marco Khan	...	One-Eye
Reece Ritchie	...	Moha
Joel Fry	...	Lu'kibu
Omar Sharif	...	Narrator
Kristian Beazley	...	D'Leh's Father
Junior Oliphant	...	Tudu
Louise Tu'u	...	Baku's Mother

También conocida como:

10,000 A.C. (Mexico) (alternative transliteration) [es]
10.000 A.C. (Argentina) [es]

MPAA:

Rated PG-13 for sequences of intense action and violence.

Duración:

109 min

País:

USA | New Zealand

Idioma:

English

Color:

Color (Technicolor)

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1

Sonido:

Dolby Digital | DTS | SDDS

Clasificación:

Norway:11 | South Africa:13V | Australia:M | New Zealand:M | Finland:K-13 | Canada:PG (Alberta/Manitoba/Ontario) | Germany:12 | Malaysia:U | Philippines:G (MTRCB) | Singapore:PG | Czech Republic:12 | South Korea:15 | UK:12A | Netherlands:12 | USA:PG-13 (certificate #43907) | Argentina:13 | Hong Kong:IIA | Portugal:M/12 | Canada:G (Québec) | Switzerland:10 (canton of Geneva) | Ireland:12A | Switzerland:10 (canton of Vaud) | Sweden:11 | Canada:14A (British Columbia)

Filming Locations:

Namibia

Company:

Warner Bros. Pictures

Trivialidades:

Release prints were delivered to some theaters under the false title -- "King Dinosurs" (that is the actual spelling).

Goofs:

Factual errors: Hard to say how accurate the makers of a film like this might be trying to be, at least in a historical sense. Since this is obviously not a documentary, many "liberties" are taken with historical truth. For example, eighteen foot long sabre tooth tigers didn't exist in this era -- nor did mastodons -- at least not in the areas depicted (Mesopotamia, northeast Africa.) Also, early in the picture we see extraordinary changes in environment(s) after relatively short travel: from snowy, mountainous areas, where no one ever shows any evidence of steam emanating from mouths or noses; suddenly to tropical areas, and then, just as suddenly to desert lands, which later in the film, characters refer to as places which would take a very, very long time to traverse; but in fact the tribe which has just done this appears quite fit, and with not much wear and tear to their clothing.

Quotes:

Tic'Tic: Be as your father.

Movie Connections:

Featured in "Siskel & Ebert & the Movies: (2008-03-15)" (2008)

For the love of God!

I'm so sick of the ignorant people's comments.

This movie is not:

1) documentary. So enough with the comments stating that it has historical inaccuracies. The role of a movie is not to tell exactly what happened in the past. Are you mad at a poet if his/her poem is not about the history?

2) theater piece. So enough with the comments complaining that the story is not good enough. There is a shiny place called a "theater" where actors perform in real time, where there is no editing, no CGI so in a theater you can expect a good story, because there is nothing else. I'm sorry if I disappoint anyone but this is not true for the cinema (at least in general). And don't blame the movie makers, they are shooting movies they can sell.

This movie is:

1) entertaining. Well... it is not a life altering experience, but it can entertain you for 90 minutes. The story is not so complicated so it is ideal if you are tired and you want to rest.

2) filled with pretty nice visual effects. It looked good; at least from where I was sitting :)

3) a remake? Well... it show similarities with other movies; that is a fact. But come on when did you see last time a movie that was completely new?

And if you disagree with me you should think about why did you watch the movie in the first place. I mean this movie was exactly what I expected it to be.