Mysterious Island (2005) (TV)

Calificación de los usuarios:

4.2/10   

Director:

Russell Mulcahy

Escritores (WGA):

Jules Verne (novel)
Adam Armus (teleplay) ...

Fecha de Lanzamiento:

17 septiembre 2005 (USA)

Género:

Ciencia-Ficción | Acción | Aventura | Fantasía

Plot Keywords:

Pirate | Based On Novel

Premios:

1 nomination

Comentarios de los usuarios:

Worst movie I have seen in a long time

Reparto

Kyle MacLachlan	...	Cyrus
Danielle Calvert	...	Helen
Gabrielle Anwar	...	Jane
Patrick Stewart	...	Nemo
Jason Durr	...	Pencroff
Omar Gooding	...	Neb
Vinnie Jones	...	Bob
Tom Mison	...	Blake
Roy Marsden	...	Joseph (as Roy Anthony Mould)
Chris Larkin	...	Atherton (as Christopher Stephens)
Dom Hetrakul	...	Sun (as Dom Hatrakul)
Nate Harrison	...	Lemay
Geoffrey Giuliano	...	Li
Banjong Siriwattanawong	...	Pirate
Daniel O'Neill	...	Young Pirate

También conocida como:

La isla misteriosa (Spain) (video title) [es]

Duración:

Japan:172 min

País:

USA

Idioma:

Inglés

Color:

Color

Clasificación:

Australia:PG | Netherlands:12 | UK:PG | Singapore:PG

Locaciones de Filmación:

Krabi, Thailand

Compañía:

Larry Levinson Productions

Errores:

Errores Reales: As with most movies and television shows, no one seems to have any conception of how heavy gold is. The treasure involves two chests, one small and one large. The actor varies the effort he uses to move the small chest. At one point he seems to act as if it were more than he could bear, but he is also seen trying to lift and carry the two stacked chests. Gold is 19.3 times heavier than water. That small chest filled with real gold would be too heavy for one man to carry, and a lone individual could not even drag the large chest filled with gold.

Worst movie I have seen in a long time

There is one thing that was really funny about this movie: Some of the effects or rather some of the sets where probably originally from the mi of the 20th century. It reminded me of monster movies from the 60ies. Overall though it was a really bad movie - especially since the reference to the badly arranged sets of 1960'es B movies was probably unintentional. This one can't be good for the reputation of Patrick Steward! I liked him a lot in other roles but even he could not save this film from dwindling in the meaninglessness of a remake of a remake of a movie made from a originally very good book. Actually - the original story seemed to have been lost during this remaking-process, since This was merely a cheap action flick with no much meaning and props that looked so much plastic that it could be debated if the company bought them actually at a toy store.