Gay Sex in the 70s (2005) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
21 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Just Like The Title Says...
cchase8 March 2006
There are very few movies that dispense with the coyness and cleverness of a catchy title, and simply tell you flat out what you can expect to see. This is one of them.

Director Joseph Lovett's documentary is kind of like one of those retrospectives you see on VH-1 or the E! Network, only with more naked men, hot explicit sex (well, explicit for a documentary), and snapshots frozen in time that show us visions of a bygone decade, where the Gay Wide World went from draconian repression, to sexual liberation of Bacchanalian proportions, to the next chapter where "the bill came due" for all that excessive indulgence.

No one clucks their tongues or passes judgment, as the interviewees regale us with tales of just how things were back in those days, (although you have to consider that there was some extravagant embellishments here and there.) I was only privy to a taste of the lifestyle of which the subjects speak in this film, and I guess I should be grateful for it, because more than likely it saved my life and the lives of more than a few other people I know. Even back then, in my younger days, I only knew of the stories about Fire Island, the New York-based bars, baths and clubs and the infamous Piers and Trucks through hearsay, and it all sounded fabulous, hedonistic and legendary even as it was happening.

There are touches of the ominous, though, and it certainly doesn't shy away from the dark side of all that "jazz." There were risks other than STD's, and in pursuit of ultimate bliss, there were some who still paid the ultimate price, and that was way before AIDS came to call.

Funny, touching, shocking and sobering all at once, the only drawback is that it isn't the fully rounded account it could be. Maybe Lovett can find a way to extend this into a series and capture more accounts of the shock waves that spread out into other parts of the country, from the "epicenter of the gay universe" as someone in the doc describes the Big Apple. New York and San Francisco were important touchstones of gay culture, but they were not the 'Alpha and Omega' of the Seventies' sexual revolution.

At the very least, it is an important historical record that a new generation can learn from, for those who think that "Stonewall" is just another place in the mall where you can buy acid-washed jeans.

And on a sadder note, maybe the reason why it hasn't been possible to film a more complete history of "Gay Sex in the Seventies," is because many of the eyewitnesses to this remarkable time in history are no longer here to tell about it. I certainly hope that isn't the case.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very good documentary
preppy-315 February 2006
Probably the first documentary ever done about gay sex before AIDS hit. It has interviews with various men who lived through the 1970s and some incredible film footage and photographs. It shows how Stonewall liberated gays and made them fight back. It opened the doors for gay bars, bathhouses and virtual nonstop anonymous sex. The movie doesn't pass judgment on the subjects. It just shows it how it was.

I was born in 1962 so when I came out in the 1980s AIDS was in full effect. I've heard how great the 70s were and this documentary shows me a time we'll probably never see again. It doesn't shy away from the dark side--it makes it clear people were robbed or beaten (or killed) and there were plenty of STDs being passed around. Also it shows the rampant drug abuse going on. I honestly can't say that I personally agree with the nonstop sex and drugs, but it does show gay men having sex and not apologizing for it--and that's just great.

This is obviously not for everybody--it's unrated but no one under 18 is admitted--and some of it may be too graphic for some (there's PLENTY of sex and nudity). Still, it chronicles an important time in gay and US history and is invaluable. I give it an 8 because it does have its slow spots.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I have seen it, too
eddiecoronado16 October 2005
I have seen this film, too, and I was somewhat taken back in time having seen it since it was a complete reenactment of my entire life in New York at that time, and a time capsule of gay like during the 1970s. I was fortunate enough to live through the AIDS era because I has a monogamous relationship at the time, but many of my friends are dead now, and that is the sad part of seeing the film. The scenes from the 70s in the film including the candid interviews made this film worthwhile. I was lucky enough to see it at a special private screening when in new york recently, and I would definitely recommend it to anyone interested in gay history and gay sex from 1969 onward. One aspect of the film discussed the discos and the baths. I remember a time when Manhattan had at least ten active gay bathhouses, from the ten story Man's Country to the sleazy Everard Baths. I went to all of them, and I still have my Continental Baths towel that I bought at Bloomingdales. What memories! I don't live in NYC anymore. I am in Hawaii, but according to this site (BathhouseGuide.com) there are still gay bathhouses operating in the Big Apple. Cheers, Eddie
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
+
lundin-23 August 2005
Excellent and to the point.

The topic is interesting and shows a clear contrast between the pre-AIDS world and the post-AIDS world. As I grew up, AIDS was already a factor, so to me the notion of random unsafe sex seems quite the gamble. It made me think about what could be discovered in years to come to make our present lifestyle seem like a game of Russian roulette. I enjoyed a short cameo by Swedish musician Sebastian Utbult! Also, anyone who is interested in the scene needs to see this movie. It's a definite trip to retrotown :)

Thank you for the eye opener, Mr. Lovett!
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Title Speaks for Itself
haridam021 January 2006
For those unfamiliar with the topic, this documentary offers good information. For those already familiar with, or who lived through or participated in it, the film's a trip down memory lane.

Joseph Lovett has assembled some period footage and photo stills to help depict his subject. But the film mostly consists of "talking heads": men in their 60s, sharing personal experiences on the atmosphere, attitudes and action from the 70s. A couple of women in their 30s also offer reflective remarks.

What a rare opportunity for people in the Northeast area of the country to be able to see this film locally, at Cleveland's unique Cinematheque. Not yet available on video or DVD, and rarely shown outside of New York, these Ohio screenings are all the more valuable.

The diverse and appreciative audience was very interested in the subject, and reacted to the humor audibly. While all this is now history, the 70s represents for many a time of liberation, experimentation, exploration and fulfillment. --h/76
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good history with lots of very attractive bodies
johnb60925 August 2006
I read the other review of this movie and couldn't believe we had seen the same film—maybe we didn't. I thought this was an interesting history of an era, perhaps a unique era, and that it had an obvious beginning and an obvious end. I especially liked that the title was so mundane.

The photos of men in NYC in the 70s were spectacular and the entire story captivating, at least for me.

I went because I tend to like documentaries and I think the movie was well structured. There is a point at which it "dawns on you" and you might even get up and go at that point but it is a good history.

I wonder what Pompeii was like...
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A frank look back... how far we've come... or have we?
trapazoid30 October 2005
A no holds barred look back at a hedonistic time of freedom for sexual awareness and discovery... it can almost make this thirty something long for a time pre AIDs. It posed a lot of questions for me like, which came first, the gay sexual carnivore, or the backlash against sexual persecution. At a screening, an audience member wished they had been old enough to have enjoyed in the decadent madness that seemed pervasive by the movie's content... and I was left to wonder, how different it was then (men having sex with strangers in bathhouses and the back of trucks and piers) to how it is now (men arranging sex dates with others online). What a wake up call to reality.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Don't miss this
reidwill28 October 2005
This film is phenomenal. Although I didn't experience this moment in history, the film takes you back both elegantly and poignantly. Through incredible footage, photos, and other memorabilia, I relived this incredible period of time. The interviews and personal stories shed an unbiased light on an important era. The film asks the questions - how did this moment in time influence the shape of the gay community for decades to come? Was this just one long hedonistic party or did this help create a sense of gay community? There are a lot of documentaries out there, but this is definitely one not to miss.

Reid Williams
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fantastic Idea / Poorly executed / Narrow Vision
jbarnes-107 February 2006
I was excited to see this documentary but it did not meet expectations.

The collections of photos from the 1970's in New York were fantastic to see and I hope that all of these men's collections will be put into the Stonewall Library and Archives. We cannot let these items get lost or destroyed.

I felt that the film (as almost all that have come before it) focused on New York and nothing else. It still amazes me the number of men who were in New York at that time who can't acknowledge that gay life was going on in cities across the country. San Francisco, Chicago, Denver, Dallas, you NEVER here about any other place or group of people except for New York in ANY documentary that gets made. I was around during that time in Denver and there was a hot gay scene in that city during the late 70's and early 80's, does the name " The Ballpark" ring anyone's bell? Men from around the World came to the parties at that bathhouse. But you never hear about it. I almost feel that there is an arrogance about New York and that it's the only place that matters because it had the largest population. It would have been nice to see a broader spectrum. The film seemed very self serving and my friends that I viewed the film with (who are from New York) felt the same.

On the positive side who can not be happy to see Tom Bianchi. He is as hot as ever and it was nice to see him on the big screen.

This film is worth seeing for the archival footage and stills but it lacks the broad scope that I had hoped it would cover. It leaves you to feel that you have just seen part one of a great documentary miniseries and are waiting for the rest of the story.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Good Ol' Bad Ol' Days of Sex in the 70's
desmondorama23 February 2008
It was almost deja vu for me, watching what lifestyle was like in those heady days of Gay sex in the 70's.

The thing about it was that it really happened just like that - not only in NYC but around the world! I lived in Perth, Australia and it was all happening here as well! This is a very good archive of a time in history and valuable in today's world.

It was fun to see all the pretty young things in their heyday who are all past middle age, yet knowing that they'd come a long way to get here.

I enjoyed it and highly recommend it to anyone who was around at the time.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Reckless?
randy-37715 September 2006
Apparently, gay sex only occurred in New York City and while this erstwhile look at a particular era may inflame the testosterone of those born after 1980, it seems to do so at a cost. It makes clear, both visually and narratively that sex was ubiquitous, unfettered and rampant, it scarcely makes the point that there was a cost, a huge human cost. In one brief scene there is a man with AIDS, who resembles the Elephant Man, and it is the only moment of contrast to the lean, athletic and handsome good looks of the gay men in the 70s. Otherwise, with a not particularly emotional scene where a man accounts for the tragic vast loss of most of his friends, the emphasis seems to be, gee, it was such a great time. And that is troubling. This seems a nostalgic and waxing look at an era with little remorse, and more dangerously, it seems to barely speak to the lessons of that era. In fact, one individual predicts that within twenty years, everything should be back to so-called normal and we can indulge our every whim and pleasure. Many, many young people have aired the opinion that this era seemed like so much fun, a celebration of the sexual and with some envy are sorry they missed it. In all likelihood if you did, you would be writing from the grave. Documentaries are by nature personal. They cannot help but suggest an opinion about the subject. Nostalgia rather than fact can be a great artistic license, but it shields the truth,and when it seems to glorify that era, much like Leni Riefenstahl's Triumph of Will, it borders on irresponsible.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great documentary on NYC gay scene
vagabondage-211 September 2006
This film has great stills, stories and footage of the NYC gay scene in the 70s. I wasn't there for it but had an older cousin who lived through it all -- it was wonderful to see "up close and personal" what all the tall tales were about. I've been doing AIDS activism for 20 years and it finally dawned on me why half of my friends dropped like flies in the mid '80s -- now I'm amazed that anyone made it through that time.

The film is not a snoozer, unless you're expecting pornography. The interviews are touching, and I was left wanting more. A must-see for the PnP boys who think they know it all, and the guys in their 60's and 70's who managed to survive it all.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A thoughtful, poignant and sexy romp!
jayme3817 June 2006
loved it! As a young female living in New York City, Joseph Lovett's film is incredibly eye opening and significant. The documentary will both shock and delight you as it takes the viewer on a journey back to a decade that was both decadent and destructive. This doc can be appreciated by all, as it successfully recaptures a time of exploration and surprise which was briefly situated between the centuries of repression that characterized the pre 1969/Stonewall years and before the AIDS crisis which devastated the gay community. This decade was a watershed moment

in the history of the evolution of the gay identity.

Beyond the tantalizing subject matter, the technical aspects of the film were impressive to say the least. Specifically, the archival work, which was extensive and entirely relevant

All in all, an incredibly significant and fascination doc and an incredibly significant and fascinating era.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Should be called, "18 New Yorkers in the 70's"
MarkDcomic21 June 2006
This is a film that suffers from the same malady that so many gay films suffer from. It's all about New Yorkers, and only eighteen of them. (Count the cast yourself.)

Like Longtime Companion, and even Angels in America, it assumes that homosexuals only live and love in NYC.

Considering the title I guess I expected a broader more enlightening documentary.

In the opening segment it promises to cover 69-81, Stonewall till AIDS. Then it goes on to cover AIDS anyway, in a tact-on perfunctory manner. "See how the consequences played out?" it seems to say.

The film is not particularly enlightening in any way and nothing that hasn't' been said before.

It would certainly be nice to see a film someday that could encompass the gay experience of all of America instead of a tiny group of New Yorkers.

The fact that San Francisco is not even mentioned should tell you that this film does not live up to it's title.

If you want to see a film about gay sexuality, you would be better off looking up "SEX IS," or even renting some classic gay porn.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Snoozfest disguised as a sex fest
gregg_biggs25 January 2006
I just saw this at the Castro Theatre in San Francisco and had trouble staying awake during this incredibly repetitive, unenlightening little film. It is a 75 minutes film that felt like 175 minutes and has about 20 minutes of modestly engaging material. It's not bad in any offensive way, it just repeats things that have been said many, many times over and more interestingly and provocatively. With only a couple of exceptions, the interviews drone on and on and on, making little emotional contact or context to the whole topic. It's more like a "how to" guide for something that can't be done anymore. I was alive during the era but felt little connection or nostalgia for what was presented.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
captures a lost time
michael-164728 November 2005
This film made me aware for the first time in years of what a heavy wall came down with the AIDS epidemic, sowing fear and shame in a community that had only really begun to form. It was a community that revolved around sex, yes, but was starting to celebrate a self awareness for the accomplishments of it's members in virtually every profession- law, literature, government, education, film, art, food, etc. Watching this film took me back before the days that fear inflicted us as much as the disease. It is a nostalgic look at a rare time, but not a thoughtless one. Maybe this film could not have been made earlier than now, when the narrators can look back from a point of middle aged survival and relative stability and remember what a strange and wonderful time it was.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wrong title
MRogersDC29 March 2009
This movie should be retitled: Sex in the 70s In a Part of New York City called Greenwich Village and Chelsea.

This movie does little to talk about sex in the 70s except focus on the hypersexual environments of public and private sex spaces in New York City. I doubt that the Manhole bar was symbolic of actual sex in the 70s and that kind of sex is much more prevalent in the film.

Don't get me wrong, the time period looks like a blast. And it's rather important to document the scene to which the film refers. But as far as calling this film Sex in the 70s, the title is a bit misleading. Technically it's no Oscar Nominee, but the rawness of it feels appropriate for the subject.

Overall, an "eh."
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A perfect time capsule of a almost lost era!
gentelg29 May 2009
This documentary gives us a look at the freedom and decadence that was a big part of gay culture between the repression of the 50s and 60s pre Stonewall era and the AIDS crisis of the 80's and 90's. What we had were the crazy 70s! The documentary acts as both a celebration of this period and as a cautionary tale about how too much excess can be dangerous and how many of the men discussed in the film had to eventually "Pay the piper".

There are some things to note for example. There seems to be more acceptance and tolerance of gays and lesbians in America now then there ever was even during the "sexual revolution" of the 70s. Back then if you were gay the only way you could truly live a free life was if you packed your bags and moved to a big city like New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, or Chicago!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent Movie: accurate, thoughtful and well-researched, with a very human touch
KentCDillon12 February 2006
This movie brought back many memories for me, as I moved to New York in 1979 and lived there until 2004. I was 29 years old in '79, having come out at the tender age of 16 in Kansas City, where I grew up. I considered moving to New York earlier, but now I am sure that I would not have survived if I had. I moved into an apartment in Greenwich Village and in those few short years before AIDS was discovered, I had sex in many of the places featured in the film. For those who may be somewhat critical of this movie or the mores of the era, it is helpful to understand that sexual liberation really began in San Francisco with the straight hippies in the late 1960's, before Stonewall ever happened. Then after Stonewall, gay life and gay sexual liberation just exploded. While I missed much of the nonstop sexual activity of the mid to late 1970's, I certainly enjoyed my fair share of sex in New York during those few short years prior to the early 1980's. The most remarkable events which occurred were only alluded to in a brief comments by Larry Kramer (and others) towards the end of the film. Larry Kramer said that when the gay community began to discover AIDS and act upon it, this was the first time that an afflicted population ever took it upon themselves to demand radical change on the part of the US government and the US medical community. The gay and lesbian communities, particularly in New York and San Francisco which were the epicenters of AIDS, came together remarkably fast and formed several political and community organizations, which ultimately raised huge sums of money and began to bring about real change and awareness of AIDS to the world. In the past 20 years, there have been many books and films which document the relatively brief history of gays and lesbians. Joe Lovett's film has added an important piece to our history.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Sincere, truthful and serious
EdgarST26 May 2021
I was surprised by the sincere and serious effort of the filmmakers to give us a truthful and convincing panorama of the sex life of male, urban and white American homosexuals in the 1970s. I lived those years and confirm that it was exactly like that. But like in many other occasions --as the machista "Skin - A Study in Nudity in the Movies" (2020), which is only about female nudity, and leaves out many pioneer women; or the very bad "Rock Hudson's Home Movies" (1992), that reveals nothing new or interesting to the viewer-- the title is too broad and ambitious, it leaves aside social, racial, economic and political aspects of the times, it omits the female point of view, and it ends relying too much on nostalgia and leaving us with an excessively optimistic view of those licentiousness years, which lead to the very dramatic years of AIDS.

However, I believe that what mainly gives positive energy to the documentary are the testimonies of some men (and a woman) who lived in those years, a bunch of happy libertines who almost tell it all... and they tell a lot. Also, it has good editing, fine selection of songs, extensive research, impressive photographs, and footage of the sexual activity of the community among white, urban, American gays.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
screw the history, pun intended..
Fred_Walker6 February 2021
This is worth a watch just for the naked men! SO hot! :P
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed