No Reservations (2007) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
155 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Lugubrious Hybrid of the Food Network and Lifetime Makes for an Attractive But Bland Movie
EUyeshima14 September 2008
Despite what I recall of the advertising campaign last year, this soft-hearted 2007 film is far less a Food Network-derived romantic comedy than a Lifetime-oriented drama about grief and work/life balance. Directed by Scott Hicks ("Shine") and written by first-timer Carol Fuchs, this film offers the most insightful peek into the workings of an upscale Manhattan restaurant since 2000's "Dinner Rush" (i.e., if you don't count last year's CGI-generated, French food-fest, "Ratatouille"), but it also seems intent in splintering the story between the romantic sparks between the co-stars and the unexpected relationship that a single aunt forms with her orphaned niece. The result is heartwarming but rather diluted considering the potential inherent in the material presented. Hicks and Fuchs also seem intent on inserting predictable clichés along the way to reinforce the formulaic approach taken with the story.

Basically a remake of the 2001 German comedy, "Mostly Martha", the plot centers on perfectionist chef Kate who runs a tightly efficient kitchen in a chic SoHo bistro. As a resolute overachiever, she is able to get up before dawn to get to the fish market and stay late at the restaurant making her impeccably presented dishes until closing. So tightly wound is Kate that restaurant owner Paula forces her to see a therapist to address her supposedly difficult personality. This is the first of several disconnects I had with the film as Kate strikes me as demanding but not particularly abusive to her staff. Regardless, her life is turned upside down by the sudden death of her sister and the addition of her niece Zoe to her structured life. As if that wasn't enough, Paula has hired Nick, a rowdy opera-loving sous-chef, to partner with Kate as she struggles with her personal transition at home. Taking a number from the Tracy-Hepburn manual for romantic comedy, tempers flare as do sparks. Zoe's recovery from her mother's death becomes a complicating factor, but the rest of the story plays out basically how you would presume.

More interesting in edgier, less sympathetic roles, Catherine Zeta-Jones plays the icier aspects of her role well, but she is markedly less arresting when her character turns warm and gooey. The script also doesn't really respect her character much since she is made to look overly foolish and insensitive in her early scenes as a struggling mother figure. Aaron Eckhart seems to be playing more of a plot device as Nick, but he does it well, and the requisite sparks occur with Zeta-Jones. Cornering the market on playing put-upon children, Abigail Breslin is fine as Zoe, even though she has to be glumly depressed for much of the film. The usually more dimensional Patricia Clarkson plays Paula as a surprisingly brittle, opportunistic character, while Bob Balaban isn't given much to do at all as Kate's therapist but act as a bromide. Stuart Dryburgh's autumnal cinematography makes all the food look good, the stars as well, and minimalist composer Philip Glass, of all people, provided the unobtrusive soundtrack dominated by Puccini, Verdi, and Flotow arias. The most significant bonus item on the 2008 DVD is a twenty-minute episode of the Food Network's "Unwrapped" which includes interviews with the film's stars and the real chefs who concocted the dishes in the movie.
24 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Delightfully Sweet
claudio_carvalho2 February 2009
In Manhattan, the workaholic Kate (Catherine Zeta-Jones) is the chef of the 22 Bleecker Restaurant owned by Paula (Patricia Clarkson), who sent her to a therapist (Bob Balaban) because she has no other interest in life but cooking and controlling her kitchen. When her only sister dies in a car accident, Kate becomes the guardian of her niece Zoe (Abigail Breslin), who can not overcome the loss of her mother. Paula orders Kate to take a couple of days off to care of Zoe; when Kate returns to the work, she finds that Paula hired the sub-chef Nick (Aaron Eckhart) without her approval. Nick explains that he is honored of working with Kate, but the jealous Kate does not trust in him and believes he wants her position. When Zoe gets close to Nick and invites him to have dinner with Kate and her, she changes her feelings for Nick. But when his work is recognized by the clients of the restaurant, Kate believes she committed a mistake.

"No Reservations" is delightfully sweet, with a nice romance supported by the magnificent chemistry of Catherine Zeta-Jones and Aaron Eckhart; a good story; a wonderful soundtrack; and the visual of splendorous dishes. The beauty of Catherine Zeta-Jones is awesome, and I really loved her character and this entertaining feel-good movie. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Sem Reservas" ("Without Reservations")
26 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
nice remake of a better movie
SnoopyStyle19 April 2015
Kate (Catherine Zeta-Jones) is the intense perfectionist head chef of an upscale Manhattan restaurant. She has anger issues and the restaurant owner Paula (Patricia Clarkson) sends her to a therapist (Bob Balaban). She lives an intense lonely single life refusing to date her neighbor Sean. Her sister dies in a car crash. Her niece Zoe (Abigail Breslin) survives and is placed with her. Zoe's father is unknown. They both struggle. Paula hires new chef Nick Palmer (Aaron Eckhart) to pick up the slack which only angers Kate.

It's a remake of 'Mostly Martha'. This is a bit lighter in tone than the original. There are some minor changes but they kept Leah pregnant with short hair. I'm glad they lost Zoe's father in this version. It was a bit of a distraction in the original.

Breslin is a great child actor. She is the big improvement over the original. She and Zeta-Jones have a compelling story. The romance with Aaron Eckhart is a little lacking. He has limited chemistry with Zeta-Jones. They're also relying on a few too many montages. I would also prefer a lot more food porn in a cooking movie. Nevertheless, this is a nice story of coming together.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Like a made for TV movie
uubloguu22 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The movie teasers shown on TV focused on the movie as a sharp, dark comedy. I was disappointed.

The little girl's grief had the woman in the row behind me crying so that her children were asking what was wrong. That part of the movie was a downer for me. I wasn't expecting it.

Spoiler below: When a boss takes on her underling as her lover, she is courting disaster, personally and professionally. I couldn't believe the head chef would risk that since that kitchen was "her life".

There was a plodding "made for TV movie" aura when Catherine Zeta Jones takes her niece to the first day of her new school. We see them arriving, walking down the hallway, meeting the new teacher. Get on with it!
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Gourmet Dish With A Strange Undertaste
dowdosean3 August 2007
I think that Catherine Zeta Jones and Aaron Eckhart could do a new version of "Prizzi's Honor" they both look like professional killers. In a nice way, of course. It wouldn't have surprised me if one of the two had produced a kitchen knife and stabbed the other multiple times. Okay, enough of that. The movie is, how shall I put it? Nice. Catherine Zeta Jones manages a sort of warmth that I had never noticed before in her and Aaron, well, he just goes for it, reveling in this film persona that he's been developing for years. The tender macho type. The food looks great but not as great as in "Big Night" remember that one? Some character touches are really spot on. The city and the dishes are photographed beautifully, the human beings a little less. I almost walked out during a musical montage but I'm a glad I didn't. All in all. Fun. Not Preston Sturges but fun.
28 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Do not have any reservations whatsoever about seeing this film, if you are a romantic comedy fan, it is terrific!
inkblot1131 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Kate (Catherine Zeta-Jones) is a sensational chef who commands the kitchen in a posh Big Apple restaurant. However, she is totally obsessed with her job and saves little time for anything else. As Kate occasionally gets irate at patrons who make any small complaints about the food, her boss (Patricia Clarkson) sends her to a counselor for therapy. Yet, even that does little good to bring a balance to her life. Things change dramatically, though, when Kate's sister dies in an automobile crash and leaves her young daughter, Zoe (Abigail Breslin) in her sibling's care. Having to take a week off from her work, Kate is chagrined to find that, upon her return, the boss lady has hired an Italian sous chef named Nick (Aaron Eckhart) to help keep the pace. Yet, these two radical alterations to Kate's life prove to be very important. Will there be a happy ending for our heroine? This remake of the very fine Mostly Martha is a great new choice for fans of romantic comedy/drama. A good deal of the credit should be extended to the nice cast, as the gorgeous Zeta-Jones, the very handsome Eckhart, and the talented Breslin make a terrific trio. Clarkson is also quite good in a supporting role. The New York City setting has never been lovelier, while the costumes and production values are great as well. As for the script, it is does not shine as brightly as the original German one but it has plenty of zest and heart. Do not have any reservations about marking the calendar to see this film. It is a feast of fun and feel-good moments.
18 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A chick flick with a touch of real life
the-movie-guy27 July 2007
(My Synopsis) Kate (Catherine Zeta-Jones) is the master chef at the trendy 22 Bleecker Street Restaurant in Manhattan. She runs her kitchen at a rapid pace as she coordinates the making and preparing of all the fantastic meals and personally displays the food to perfection on every dish. She intimidates everyone around her, so her boss sends her to therapy. Kate hates to leave the kitchen when a customer wants to compliment her on one of her special dishes, but she is ready to leave the kitchen in a second when a customer insults her cooking. Kate's sister is killed in a car accident and her nine-year old daughter Zoe (Abigail Breslin) moves in with Kate. With all of Kate's problems, the boss hires a new chef to join the staff. Nick (Aaron Eckhart) is a rising star in his own right and could be the head chef of another restaurant, but he wants to work under Kate. Kate begins to feel threatened by Nick, because he has a different style of running the kitchen. Nick loves to listen to opera when he cooks and to make the staff laugh. With all that is going on in Kate's life, falling for a man is the last thing she was looking for. There is some kind of chemistry between Kate and Nick that can only go one way. Yet life will hit her in the head when Kate's boss offers Nick the head chef job.

(My Comment) You know before going in that this is a chick flick. If anything, I wanted to see Catherine Zeta-Jones do her thing. The movie actually touches on a hard subject of what can happen in life when someone you love dies. Kate had her own life and now she is responsible for her niece Zoe. Being responsible for a child will change your life dramatically, and Kate discovers that very soon. What used to be important to Kate is not so important, and she must work very hard to build a relationship with Zoe. Yes, this is a chick flick, but it also touches real life to. I think the real star of the movie was Abigail Breslin. Abigail was able to pull off her part and make you believe that her mother had actually died. Most of the movie is light hearted and fun to watch and is very predictable. (Warner Bros. Pictures, Run time 1:44, Rated PG)(6/10)
17 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
No Reservations About "No Reservations"
brenttraft9 August 2007
"No Reservations" is not a great film, nor does it pretend to be. It is very predictable and follows the formula used in countless other movies. Despite that, it give you everything you want from this type of film and is better than many of the sequels that have come out this year.

Catherine Zeta Jones is as beautiful as ever. There is a nice dose of Verdi and Puccini opera arias, and Abigail Breslin steals the film like she did with "Little Miss Sunshine." I have not liked Aaron Eckert in the past, but in this film he brings happiness to the otherwise dour Zeta Jones.

Some of the professional critics said they like the original German film "Mostly Martha" better, but I thought that "No reservations" improved on the original in every possible way. The only valid criticism I could find was that Catherine Zeta Jones is too beautiful to be believable as a lonely chef. That is a flaw I can live with.

If you are looking for a break from the so-called Summer "action" films, "No Reservations" is not very original, but it certainly fits the bill. The only drawback is that you will definitely leave the theater feeling really hungry for good food.
102 out of 126 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Why, I've been truffled..."
screenwriter-1428 July 2007
NO RESERVATIONS is an entertaining and nice summer 2007 film which gives an audience a very interesting and intelligent female lead in Cathterine Zeta-Jones as a Chef in the high profile "foodie biz" of chic New York and has the talented Aaron Eckhardt as her protagonist and romantic counterpart. Abigail Breslin in her "little grab the heart" role, shots of the village, wonderful appetizing displays of food and the glam gal, Patricia Clarkson, keeping 22 Beeker running and filled with customers. Have I mentioned that this film makes you want to pay attention the next time in your city a very pretentious and high profile restaurant opens for business? And, reservations are needed.
12 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Go and see the original "Bella Martha"
pefrss30 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Go to the video store and get the original. I do not understand why Hollywood has that need to take a perfect foreign movie and remake it. "Mostly Martha" or "Bella Martha" has a much better cast. Beginning with the heroine Martina Gedeck, who convinced me much more in the role of the work-obsessed perfectionist than the more famous Catherine Zeta Jones, to the Italian cook and the niece suddenly deprived of her mother and forced to live with an aunt, not fit for child-rearing.

In many ways, the American version of the movie is a copy of the German original. They just exchanged the actors. However, they also changed the story because it would have been difficult and not very believable to materialize a father for the little girl in an American context.

I was thinking about that. Maybe the father could have been Puerto Rican, or Cuban, or Mexican. Well, there are so many "guest workers" in the U.S. Take your pick. But I doubt that any of them would have shown up to shoulder the responsibility as the Italian father did in the original. Therefore, the American movie leaves that part out but keeps the Italian cook. And by doing this the whole story changes. In the original "Martha" is so removed from reality that she thinks it is okay to send her niece off with a complete stranger in a foreign country.

The American "Martha" is softer and therefore the movie is sweeter and does not have that edge the German movie has.

In the original the "Italian" cook is not so good looking but much more charming , the little girl is more of a brat but much more believable and "Martha" is more representative of a career woman in today's world than the watered down version we are presented in the American version. And the whole opera music in the American version was very annoying. I loved the Italian songs in the original and bought the CD.

Hollywood recognized that "Mostly Martha" was a great movie. Maybe the distribution companies should have put it in more theaters or it should have been shown in English without subtitles. In any case, the original is so much better. By the way this reminds me of another remake. "Shall we dance" is one of my favorites in the original Japanese version and totally forgettable in the American version.
48 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Loved it
dmasursky22 July 2007
I loved the German film (Mostly Martha) that is the basis of this remake, and I was worried that the transition to Hollywood would spoil all the things that made the original so delightful. But I was very pleasantly surprised. There is a substantial plot change, but it doesn't wreck the movie, and a lot of the original dialog is kept word-for-word. Even if you know nothing about the original film, this is a lovely romantic comedy. During the sold-out preview show that I attended, people were laughing at the right moments and feeling moved at the right times too, and the casting was spot on - Catherine Zeta-Jones is perfect as the work-obsessed Kate dealing with the disruption of her perfectly-ordered life and Aaron Eckhart is irresistible with his mop of hair and those dimples. And what can you say about Abigail Breslin except that she's the most natural child actor working today. If you like romantic comedies, you'll like this one - it's smart, charming and you're rooting for the couple from the minute they meet. I can recommend this without reservations.
101 out of 140 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Transfatty
tedg20 November 2007
I love this stuff, situations where you have copies of movies: remakes, many sequels, "homages." That way you can transcend certain weaknesses of a project. Its because when you come to a film cold, the context is merely the universe of other films which is to say the stories we use in imagining our lives. When its a remake like this, that context collapses to the previous film and what we see are the differences. In intelligent subsequents, these extend and annotate. In dumb ones like this they reinvent.

The original film depended on you knowing that it was a film made by Germans about German limitations. German thought is mechanical, constrained, learned. German food is as well, even when using the styles from elsewhere. So a well-regimented, obsessive kitchen is a great cinematic metaphor for the world in which our heroine is captured. When we see her prison, we see the emotional prison Germans consider themselves in. So it matters that the interloper is Italian, essentially a lower body emotional intuitive. And it matters that the regime of the kitchen is suffused with music.

It even matters that the music is opera, that one thing that remains from Italian art that can be said to be both emotionally deep (embodied) and strictly — oh so strictly — ordered. The original, therefore, mattered. It worked. It touched, avoiding the limits of the traditional romantic story. Its all about transcending constraints. Incidentally, in touching this, the original understood female stereotypes better, including the use of the redhead shorthand.

It mattered that the original included the father and his social standing.

I've never been impressed by Zeta-Jones as an actress, though her entertainment gig in "Chicago" was impressive. Here, she is photographed to her disadvantage. The poster for the film understood her one charming pose. It doesn't appear in the film, and her face is lit as an object in the environment rather than the focus it normally would be.

That environmental perspective is where this film is superior to the original for me. Where nearly all the values are watered down to satisfy an apparently unsophisticated American market, the movement and order of the kitchen are better delivered here than in the original. The food is more immediately succulent. The smells, flames, tastes, are closer. The score helps.

Ted's Evaluation -- 2 of 3: Has some interesting elements.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than I expected
barrys8215 August 2007
Usually I don't watch or like romantic comedies, but this one was surprisingly entertaining and enjoyable. The story was good, a lot like Raising Helen but without the charm of Kate Hudson, and also a decent adaptation from the German film Mostly Martha. The plot although it was a little predictable, it convince me gratefully. It has some very funny moments, the drama was acceptable and the romance was credible. Great cast, the acting was very decent from everyone, Catherine Zeta Jones with a role that fits her really well, Aaron Eckhart very good performance, he is a very versatile actor, the chemistry between Zeta Jones and Eckhart is awesome, you can really feel the attraction between them. And Abigail Breslin again with a very solid performance, she is building a very strong career despite of her very young age. The soundtrack was simply excellent, choosing classic music gives the movie a unique and enjoyable feeling. In conclusion, this movie is like a big slice of chocolate cake, you enjoy it to the end, but can't support another one. A film that girls will love and excellent to watch it with a love one. Not recommendable if you are single.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Can't touch the original (Mostly Martha)
spradley-316 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I hesitated seeing this movie, having really enjoyed the original, 'Mostly Martha'. What a disappointment. Catherine Zeta Jones is a good actress but this wasn't her film. The original had poignant moments, perfectly punctuated with an incredible soundtrack. No reservations felt like it never connected. The food, the characters - nothing felt passionate. In Mostly Martha, the food came alive- every scene was filmed in such a way you could taste it with your eyes - the smells, the textures. The food in 'No Reservations' was in the background - rarely did we get a closeup of the preparation; the characters were not real enough to carry the movie without it. It was hard finishing the movie - many of the scenes felt awkward. See the original - it's a truly enjoyable movie; the soundtrack incredible.
23 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Yes, reservations.
JohnDeSando25 July 2007
"There is no spectacle on earth more appealing than that of a beautiful woman in the act of cooking dinner for someone she loves." Thomas Wolfe

Ratatouille renewed my appetite for food movies, just as Babette's Feast whetted it almost 20 years ago. No Reservations reminds me that even a well-intentioned food movie can be poorly served. Yuck, it's like looking at beautifully-appointed wax fruit; Look too closely and you'll not eat it. If you do eat, you'll regret.

I regret that the beautifully put together Catherine Zeta Jones as Chef Kate at a trendy eatery on Bleeker St. cannot generate half the soul a little animated rat does when he tosses a garlic in a stew. When she puts truffles in a quail sauce, it's like an inept carpenter destroying your cherry cabinet with one blow: You just know he is in the wrong profession. Granted, Zeta-Jones's Kate has the maudlin ingredient cooked right into the plot—her sister killed in an auto accident, her niece becoming her ward, the music tinkling when they look at the family photos and swelling when they do "crazy" things together to create the elusive bond.

All I took away from this tear-jerking rom-com was a desire to go home and cook my favorite pasta combination; Aaron Eckhart's sous-chef Nick inspired me with his combination. But in the end, I laughed little (cooking cute is a tough assignment), was annoyed at the well-worn plot (Would Kate and Nick fall in love, she the crusty chef, he the canoodling cook?), and just wanted to get the bill and go.

As you can tell, I have plenty of reservations about No Reservations. See what I mean: You knew I'd try to be critic cute with that title. What fun can it be to know what's going to happen?
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Tired...
jpschapira15 August 2007
I honestly can't remember the last time I saw a good film on a movie theater. My latest experiences have been "Wild Hogs", "Ocean's Thirteen", "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix", now "No reservations"; which is not a bad film, but like so many, is regular and pointless at times and it makes you wonder why it was done.

I don't have the answer, but I do have more questions; with no answers of course: Why did Catherine Zeta-Jones do it? Why did Aaron Eckhart do it? And Abigail Breslin? And director Scott Hicks: why did he wait six years after the fantastic "Hearts in Atlantis" to do this? Is there a problem with agents? Luckily, I don't have to blame them much because, during most of the time, all of the mentioned above did a good job.

At times, however, they (the actors) look tired and their expressions don't seem so real. It happened mostly with Zeta-Jones, but it also occurred to Eckhart and Breslin. Maybe they couldn't believe what they were reading; watching "No reservations" is to watch intelligent people speaking silly words and a therapist (a likable Bob Balaban) making some sense out of everything…But the therapist doesn't appear long enough.

We don't have to forget that this is a remake and apparently Carol Fuchs couldn't do much with her script, taken from the old one of Sandra Nettelbeck. Sometimes when a writer takes on an old screenplay, you can sense a certain amount of freshness and originality, even if you haven't seen the original film; Carol Fuch's work is not the case.

There are a small number of comedies about love and cooking I like. The one I always recall is "Simply Irresistible", because it's an irresistible movie even when it exaggerates things… This I say it because "No reservations" sticks a lot to reality, with the help of Breslin's unique charm and naturalness and her instant chemistry with Zeta-Jones, and her chemistry with Eckhart; the elements that make the film watchable.

I've got to say about Eckhart; he's got a perfect way of creating completely different individuals in every film. I was revising his work and he has been part of films I have seen but I don't remember his presence in them…And tell me something about that beard in "Erin Brockovich". Here, he sings opera and jumps around in a state of eternal happiness; and he's more than contagious.

The other contagious thing I forgot to mention is the food…My God! Every dish looks amazing and you will spend the whole movie wanting to eat something. But the place where they cook it is so not contagious. In a simple production design, the kitchen where most of the movie takes place appears as empty as "No reservations" itself. I didn't want a place with shining lights and special effects, I know people are making food; but I felt I needed something a bit more exciting.

I haven't even said that Patricia Clarkson is in the movie; but that's because she's completely underused. Oh, and Phillip Glass' light score also has its moments.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
the film should have been like the food on the plates
jaybob12 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
No Reservation was based on the Gernan Movie Mostly Martha which was a delight.You would expect a film adaptation starring the beautiful Catherine Zeta Jones, & Aaron Eckatt & featuring the Little girl who brightened up Little Miss Sunshine, to be at least enjoyable.

OH what a mistake this film is. This was supposed to be a romantic comedy with some serious moments. It is NOT romantic, it is not funny either.

Both leads are chefs in a very high priced restaurant, The food plates look delicious. I wish the film was as enjoyable.

Please do not get me wrong, it is not that bad a movie, it just not what was said about it. There is very little chemistry between the 2 leads & young Miss Breslin is no where as convincing as she was in her debut film. Little Miss Sunshine.

The film was made in New York City,It could have been made just as well & cheaper on a sound stage.

Ratings **1/2 (out of 4) 72 points (out of 100) IMDb 6 (out of 10)
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fair version of a great 2001 movie
SimonJack7 January 2017
For anyone who hasn't seen the 2001 German film, "Mostly Martha," this movie will pass as a good story. But, those of us who have seen the original have a standard with which to compare. Thus, my rating of six stars for "No Reservations."

The performances here are okay, with even more humor written into this all American version. But, that's precisely one of the big drawbacks to this film compared to the original. In "Martha," much of the substance of the film flowed from the differences of two countries – Germany and Italy. The principal characters fit that scheme. But the biggest aspect is the seeming naturalness of the original film. It was an original story and it seemed to flow naturally. Whereas, one is more aware of the acting in this movie.

Naturally, the script has some changes as well. But, this movie is never able to bring out the nuances of Martha from the original. Kate, played by Catherine Zeta-Jones, doesn't seem to be the same intense, then conflicted, and gradually warming character. And, Aaron Eckhart's Nick seems more of an amiable, good-hearted character – a nice likable guy one might see in any restaurant kitchen. Rather, in "Martha," Mario stands out as a character in the Hamburg kitchen. Sergio Castellitto played the part as a foreigner who nevertheless knows his business and is welcomed.

Again, this isn't a bad film. Most people will enjoy it. But for those who have seen the original, it comes across as very light and just so-so.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mostly Marta Redone
deanofrpps5 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This American remake of the 2002 German film MOSTLY MARTA barely captures the delicacy of German template. While Catherine Zeta-Jones plays the part of Master Chef Kate functioning on the edge with a great deal of sensitivity, the American version fails to capture the attraction of opposites in the German original MOSTLY MARTA. A major element of the conflict of opposites in the original MOSTLY MARTA was the cultural conflict between the Italian sous chef and the German chef. The American film avoid the cultural clash.

The funniest line from the German original could not be worked into the American copy:

Mario: Why would she (your niece) want to stay with her family in sunny Italy when she can return to cold and grey Germany to live there with a nut case like you?

Although NO RESERVATIONS is a well made film, it represents an alarming tread in the US theatre borrowing good films from elsewhere and trying to translate the story line into an American venue.

Social circumstances are not completely congruous. The scene where Zoe, Kate's ward and niece, gets in trouble at school for telling the teacher that she works in a restaurant does not translate well into the NYC public school system which hears this everyday. In highly regimented and regulated German such a report would be an atrocity.

The American theatre should abandon remakes of foreign films and strive for a degree of originality.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very likable even for a formula romcom, mainly because of the terrific casting
jemps91830 September 2007
Very likable even for a formula romcom, mainly because of the terrific casting and performances of the actors.

The forever beautiful and talented Catherine Zeta-Jones (Chicago, The Mask of Zorro) is spot on as Kate, a workaholic chef at hoity toity 22 Bleeker. Kate unexpectedly inherits her niece Zoe, played tremendously well by Abigail Breslin (Little Miss Sunshine). Real-life motherhood must have enabled Zeta-Jones to show her softer side with the restraint her character called for.

Aaron Eckhart (Thank You for Smoking, Black Dahlia) is Nick, the Italian-trained, opera-singing, charismatic new chef who invades Kate's precision-perfect French kitchen. Nick is Kate's quintessential opposite and eventually helps her sort out her trust issues and even enhances her parenting skills.

It is refreshing to see CZJ back on the silver screen where she belongs, and playing a non-glamorous character for once, even sans makeup in some scenes. At 38 years old, that is a brave feat indeed (and this courage is consistent with all the flawed characters she likes to play).

Her on screen chemistry with Eckhart is positively sizzling, and his cockiness to her coolness effectively makes you forget about the trite plot. While Zeta-Jones has also been criticized for being too beautiful for the role of a lonely chef, that is actually one of the ironies of life that this movie uncovers: beauty and talent doesn't really guarantee bliss.

Despite the awful MTV-like montage of the trio grocery shopping and the rest of the unspectacular elements, overall, the movie makes you feel for the characters. You leave the cinema all warm and fuzzy, and that makes the execution of No Reservations a success.
42 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Easily watchable but pretty much what you expect from a romantic (drama)dy
juneebuggy28 November 2015
This was pretty much what I expected although more on the romantic/drama than romantic comedy side of things. The story has been done many times before so this is predictable yet somehow still didn't feel redundant to me. It follows a workaholic New York City chef (this time around) who must suddenly deal with taking care of her orphaned 9 year old niece.

Catherine Zeta-Jones is suitably (bitchy) giving off a no-nonsense intensity as she runs her kitchen. I did enjoy (as always) Aaron Eckhart as her easy going love interest and Abigail Breslin puts in a great performance as the orphaned niece. I felt sad for her and she seemed to bring out the best in both of her leads. The romance here is meh, whatever, the story brainless and the ending kinda cheesy but still an easily watchable movie. 11/17/15
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Had a chance but.....
Starrman2112 August 2007
This movie had all the potential and makings of a great feel good, great love story...the cast is perfect, the visuals work, the original premise works, the characters work....but the story moves from one chess move to the next in a most predictable way...not one character in the movie has any depth or has any depth explained by the director. All we know about Catherine Zeta-Jones character is she is obsessed with her world....nobody is allowed in and nobody challenges her world...that much is obvious....but the remaining characters all have their own dimensions that are really never explored or exposed....Aaron Eckhart's character had so much more to offer to the story but wasn't allowed, Abigail Breslin's character is so easy to understand that her performance comes across somewhat predictable and phony....in the end everything reverts back to the forced turbulent world of Catherine Zeta-Jones which the audience never totally falls for....honestly, her turbulent world is not much more than a portrayal of a selfish, self obsessed, spoiled lady who most people would not have much time or sympathy for in the real world. The director needed to make her a hero and never does....in the end, it is Eckhart's character that ultimately wins because he wins.

Not a lousy movie, just a movie that could have been a lot better with more depth of personalities allowed in, explained and exposed.

Cheers
62 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A great date movie
HotToastyRag18 December 2017
Catherine Zeta-Jones plays a gourmet New York chef who's in mandatory therapy because her boss, restaurant owner Patricia Clarkson, thinks she's too structured and uptight. She's single and set in her ways, but when her sister dies and leaves her young daughter, Abigail Breslin, in her charge, her entire life turns upside down. Add in a radical new chef, Aaron Eckhart, in her kitchen, and she almost becomes completely unglued!

Catherine Zeta-Jones gives a surprisingly good performance in this comedy-dramedy. Usually, audiences are too stunned by her appearance to even bother noticing whether or not she can act, but in this one, they try very hard to downplay her looks so her acting can shine. She's still beautiful, but it's easy to see her frustration, loneliness, and tenderness. She's in a role that could easily be hammed up by a lazy actress so that the audience quickly gets that she feels out of her element, but Catherine plays it in a realistic way.

Abigail Breslin gives one of her best performances in No Reservations. She can cry at the drop of a hat, and when the script calls for her to be angry, hopeful, or cute, she easily complies. And, while I'm not a very big fan of the rest of the cast, Aaron Eckhart, Patricia Clarkson, and Lily Rabe, they're perfectly adequate in the roles they're given. Aaron is supposed to be at ease and full of himself, Patricia is supposed to be competent and in control, and Lily is supposed to be low-class and annoying.

If, by any chance, you've seen the original German film, Mostly Martha, you should be forewarned that No Reservations takes a very different tone. The romance is barely a plot point in the original, and it's much more of a drama. The American remake is lighter and more romantic.

Either director Scott Hicks or cinematographer Stuart Dryburgh chose a very interesting filming style. In every scene that is supposed to show Catherine's structure, the shots are framed through windows or with bars and lines in the background. While you might not notice the consistency at first, it's quite clever and adds to the feeling of relaxation when she finally lets her hair down. My one complaint in the film-besides my lack of enthusiasm for the romance-is the food shown in Catherine's kitchen. She's a perfectionist and a gourmet, but she's rarely shown preparing or discussing ornate dishes. In one scene, she's given the task of putting a sugar spun garnish on a dessert, something that would never be done by the head chef-and would be taken care of during the preparation hours before the restaurant's open, not during the dinner rush. Besides that, the script is pretty cute, and it's a great date movie to watch with someone you hope will become your sweetie pie.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A good movie for a sick day.
tcondren8 April 2014
So upon having to watch this film while both my teacher was out sick and I was in class sick, I really didn't expect much all things being considered. I was pleasantly surprised by this movie's ability to bring up emotions.

Won't bother explaining the basics of the film since you can get that straight from the description. What I will say is that although it doesn't have the deepest story or background, it is charming. It will make you feel legitimately happy or sad for the characters and smile at some of it's quirkier moments.

Being a romance film, it obviously has the downside of being fairly unrealistic, at least in my opinion. Everything centers around romance in some way and it seems a bit more like a dream that belongs to the girl in high school that works 24/7 to over achieve and yet never gets little affection, so that did leave a bad taste in my mouth when looking back on it.

It's something to watch when you have a cold since emotions are the only things you can feel when sick. It's also something you only need to watch once to fully enjoy.

If you have the time then go ahead and watch it, but if you're looking for something that will keep you thinking or sitting on the edge of your seat, you're in the wrong place.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Bland
nuttymoo7221 September 2007
Well, i must admit, when i saw the trailer for this movie, i was looking forward to it. I am generally a fan of light hearted romantic comedies and from the trailer, thats the impression i got of this movie. However, i spent most of the movie waiting for the comedy to begin. Although there were a couple of amusing scenes, in general the outlook of the movie was quite depressing.

I also found it difficult to fall in love with any of the characters as they all seemed a little underdeveloped, the time which the director could have used exploring the characters taken up by a needless overuse of Opera, making the movie feel dragged out and slow.

All in all, although there are some touching scenes, the trailer is quite deceptive and i would only suggest you go watch this if there is really nothing else that tickles your fancy.

Not fantastic, and as i have said before; Bland.
78 out of 130 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed