"Hawaii Five-O" Just Lucky, I Guess (TV Episode 1969) Poster

(TV Series)

(1969)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Good Performances and Direction Undermined by Lapses of Logic in Script
Aldanoli17 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This early second season episode features some fine performers -- and performances -- but is weighed down by a script with too many lapses in logic. Familiar character actors John Randolph and Herb Vigran are two hardware salesmen at a convention in Honolulu, when Randolph decides to pick up an 18 year-old call girl played by Elaine Joyce (one of her two Five-O appearances -- both as prostitutes!) But he gets more than he bargained for when her pimp/pusher Charley Bombay (Albert Paulsen) decides to toss her off a balcony because she's holding out a kilo of heroin from him. Unfortunately, the show migrates uneasily between subplots that seem to have come from different episodes: Randolph as the witness who shouldn't have been there when a murder is committed, and Anne Helm as the policewoman recruited by McGarrett to play the sister of the murdered woman -- a retread of the main plot from the first season opener, "Full Fathom Five" (in which the policewoman was even named "Joyce" as in this episode).

The problems with this episode begin with Randolph's frequent denials that he saw or heard anything incriminating the night that he was in the apartment -- until McGarrett does everything short of physical abuse in the final scene to get him to change his mind -- while Paulsen's character watches the whole exchange! One can almost hear the defense attorney cross-examining him: "So, Mr. Sloane -- isn't it true that on at least four occasions you denied seeing anyone in the apartment? And that you only identified Mr. Bombay after relentlessly being badgered to do so by Five-O head Steve McGarrett?" McGarrett's speech at the end about "citizen involvement" rings a little hollow considering how much he had to browbeat Randolph's character to get a (reluctant) identification -- he's hardly more "involved" than a jail-house snitch.

One also has to question why McGarett needs the Randolph character as a witness so desperately anyway. First we're shown that Chin Ho has audio-taped policewoman Joyce making the deal to buy the heroin, and then she gives Bombay the drugs as McGarrett, Danny Williams, and at least two other police operatives have them under surveillance. And then Bombay tries to flee, first in a car and then on foot, which is itself fairly strong evidence of guilt. Even if Bombay managed to toss away the heroin before Williams and McGarrett got there, McGarrett would have had plenty to put him away for drug dealing -- and even kidnapping, because Bombay's assistant made her leave where she was sitting at gunpoint. But McGarrett claims that without Randolph's identification, he'll have to let Bombay go!

There are also problems with the subplot involving policewoman Joyce. Although McGarrett insists on schooling her in the minutest details of the person she's impersonating, Bombay seems to accept it almost without question -- he only checks on one phone call she makes -- and thereafter treats her with kid gloves. If he's willing to throw one woman off a balcony with almost no prompting, and he has the Joyce character alone in his office, why does he treat the Joyce character so respectfully?

What redeems the episode are the performances and the direction by Nicolas Colasanto. Colasanto keeps the story moving (and the audience off-balance) with a mixture of long, medium, and extreme close-ups, as well as some disorienting choices in placing his actors. For instance: Paulsen walks into the prostitute's apartment and sits down on a coffee table facing away from the camera, then addresses her by turning halfway around; Helm's first appearance has her at the far end of McGarrett's office, in a long-shot that goes on and on; and in the first meeting between Paulsen and Helm, we're treated to closeups of a glass of whiskey (because the woman Helm is pretending to be is an alcoholic) with Paulsen fingering the ice cubes, but virtually no dialogue.

The actors likewise are a saving grace: Paulsen, with his faintly European accent and bad comb-over, was always rewarding as a villain, and he does his usual competent job here, alternating between speaking softly and shouting. Randolph gives a painfully agonized performance as a "regular guy" who finds himself in deeper waters than he anticipated, and he has a particularly good scene with Herb Vigran that adds nothing to the plot but gives more depth to his character than any of his scenes with McGarrett. Anne Helm does some agonizing herself, both in her rehearsals for the part as the dead woman's sister and in her scenes playing mouse to Paulsen's cat; and even Elaine Joyce, in her few minutes on camera, manages to make her character more than just a cardboard pretty face.

All in all, this episode is a mixed bag -- if one ignores the odd choices made by the writer in advancing the plot, it's worthwhile for the direction and the acting.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
No man is an island in the islands
schappe129 March 2008
This was the first episode of Hawaii Five-0 I ever saw. I was a teenager at the time and I watched what my parents watched, which didn't include H5-0. For whatever reason, I had control of the TV set that night and caught the opening scene of this, probably while flipping channels. Seeing John Randolph hiding, watching Albert Paulsen pushing Elaine Joyce off that balcony was a grabber. The famous opening credit sequence did the rest.

The show is most famous for its pacing and its all-business demeanor, (no humorous sub-plots here). But it was also a show with some remarkable character studies by guest stars like John Randolph, a former black-list victim who was just getting his career going again in the late 60's. Here he plays a conservative businessman who saw an opportunity to break out of his shell and winds up in the middle of a terrible mess. Does he testify against a dangerous racketeer and risk retribution and the shattering of his image back home? Or does he put the bad guy in jail and avenge the death of the young woman? He's terrific in this role.

And the whole this is capped off by McGarrett quoting John Donne. Here is the whole 'meditation' by Donne: "All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies, one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better language; and every chapter must be so translated...As therefore the bell that rings to a sermon, calls not upon the preacher only, but upon the congregation to come: so this bell calls us all: but how much more me, who am brought so near the door by this sickness....No man is an island, entire of itself...any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee." There may have been some logical gaps in the episode, (there usually are), but I found this episode very affecting and having seen it again for the first time in nearly 40 years as part of the Season II DVD release, I found it had the same impact on me that it did then.

It's one of Hawaii Five-0's all time best episodes.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A witness and a snake of a villian
lukebernstein35 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
A man witnesses a murder of an 18 year old girl by a pimp and guy involved in drugs. The episode is about mcgarrett and five o trying to nail the "snake" as mcgarrett calls him. And trying to get the witness to admit that he say the murder. In the end he agrees to testify. This was a good episode. A hateable bad guy who gets what he deserves in the end.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A very, very good episode, but I think Danno might have a drug problem!
planktonrules17 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The episode begins with a nervous middle-aged man (John Randolph) going into a hotel room with a prostitute. Only moments later, there is a knock on the door and the lady of easy virtue tells her client to hide--and hold onto a key. While hiding, Randolph watches in horror as the woman is pushed off the balcony to her death! Apparently she was hiding something the thug wanted and in his anger he murdered her.

Randolph wants to contact the police, as he can identify the murderer, but he also is afraid to step forward because of the publicity. After all, most respected businessmen don't want to be identified as customers of prostitutes and what will his wife and daughter think?! Eventually McGarrett is able to find the witness...and so does the mobster and his gang of thugs. Will he testify or assume room temperature? Tune in a find out for yourself.

At one point in the show, it becomes obvious that the hood killed the hooker because she'd stolen some drugs from him. In a clever move, when Danny finds some white powder a bit later, he does the typical cliché of the era--tasting the powder and declaring that it's 'H' (i.e., heroin). What if it had been rat poison or the powdered remains of Aunt Millie following her cremation?! I am sure in real life they would have just sent the powder to the lab...or maybe Danno just developed a taste for heroin and was chomping at the bit to try some!

By the way, this episode was directed by Nicholas Colasanto--the same guy who later played 'Coach' on "Cheers". It's nice to see that he did a good episode, as his last outing for the show ("To Hell With Babe Ruth") was just awful--saddled with terrible casting and a horrible script. This time, everything (other than Danno's possible drug problem) was worked out great and the script was taut and exciting.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Crime Does Not Pay!
brushwoodv27 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A classic Five-0 episode involving personal dilemma versus moral wrongs. One man's reputation versus the greater good. A very good example of how one bad decision, (that you're sure no one will find out about), suddenly puts you in over your head in an even worse situation. Commanding performance from Emmy Award winning actor Albert Paulsen, as the murderer in this episode. He has played several different villains on Five-0, Mission: Impossible, and many other TV shows of the era. However, he always managed to play each one differently, and his acting capabilities are outstanding. Overall a very good episode, with one of the times that Five-0 used a female police officer, to help apprehend the suspect. The ending could have been a little less rushed, in the sense that the witness, (after a lecture/ plea for help from McGarrett), has a sudden character arc and settles his conflicted feelings, to tell the truth after all. It seemed so last minute. In any case, the bad guy made the mistake of assuming that after one attempt to kill the witness, he would just leave him alone and wouldn't talk! I'm not on the killer's side here, but seriously! Duh! Also there are these slightly annoying baseball references through the episode: the witness played middle league baseball for three years, and McGarrett and the killer both describe their progress in terms of bases. Why? Again, very good episode, ending with McGarrett quoting a piece of great poetry. Thank you to the other reviewer, on showing us the whole poem!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed