"Law & Order" Equal Rights (TV Episode 2002) Poster

(TV Series)

(2002)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Grand deceptions
TheLittleSongbird26 May 2022
'Law and Order' was a brilliant show in its prime and overall is actually my favourite of the 'Law and Order' franchise and out of it, 'Special Victims Unit' (the longest running, but has been very inconsistent for a long time now) and 'Criminal Intent' (very good Seasons 1-4 and last season but uneven in Seasons 5-9). Despite not feeling the same post-Briscoe and becoming more variable post-Season 10. "Equal Rights" is not unfamiliar territory but it is a relevant issue worth addressing.

An issue that is generally handled very well and while it is not an exceptional or a special episode "Equal Rights" is solid enough and deserves a higher rating. There may not be much new, but it is an interesting subject matter and done tactfully and not too one-sidedly. As far as Season 12 goes, "Equal Rights" is neither one of the best or one of the worst. Somewhere firmly in the middle (the general standard of most of the season's episodes), which is not too bad a position to be in.

Beginning with what could have been done better, part of me actually thought that it could have done with more surprises, other episodes of the season were twistier and the twists were a lot more unpredictable.

It perhaps could have done with more tension and emotion, from tackling more difficult subjects in a more complex and pull no punches way. The first half isn't quite as good as the second, it's interesting enough and Briscoe and Green's chemistry is great, there is just a feeling of we've seen this all before. Elisabeth Rohm comes over as stiff and robotic.

However, there is still a lot to like. The rest of the acting is more than fine, with Sam Waterston being typically authoritative and ruthless. Jerry Orbach and Jesse L Martin are also great and Bob Dishy is good value. Karen Young's performance is deeply felt. The script is tight and thoughtful, while also not being over-complicated or sugar-coated. There is a good deal of talk but it doesn't feel too much. The second half does compel a good deal and the moral dilemmas of the case are handled well. One is scared too at how what the victim was up to can happen and does happen and very easily.

Furthermore, the production values are still fully professional, the slickness and subtly gritty style still remaining. The music is sparingly used and is haunting and thankfully non-overwrought. The direction shows some nice tension in the legal scenes. The material is richer in the legal scenes, hence why the second half fares strongly. It was interesting to have one of the show's most reprehensible victims in a while and a defendant that is oddly empathetic.

Overall, pretty good if not great. 7/10.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Because you needed him to be as angry as you were.
Mrpalli7716 November 2017
Early in the morning, two girls were talking about marriage issues while walking down the dock, when they bumped into a dead body on the ground. The victim, a wealthy man wearing an expensive watch, was shot two times, first in stomach then in the chest. He worked as a stock analyst downtown and recently he willingly offered overpriced stocks to his clients before the price fell down. As investigation goes by, it's easy to figure out many clients wanted him six feet under. His brother-in-law (Brian O'Neill) was the perp and the motive is the huge amount of money he lost (more than 200 grand); anyway he's not the only one inside the family who held a grudge against the con artist. The wife was beaten up repeatedly over the years (she took pictures of her bruises) and she couldn't manage to get away because he harassed her wherever she was. Lewin wanted McCoy to take a plea before trial, fearing about the sentence, but no deal was taken. Will the jury let her walk free?

This plot anticipate what really happened not so many years after the episode airing: stock brokers swindling innocent investors, ripping life saving off in a blink of an eye. That's Gordon Gekko teaching!
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An appealing defendant
bkoganbing4 February 2017
A body right by the Hudson River ferry dock is what brings Jerry Orbach and Jesse Martin to the scene. The victim for whom great pains were taken to conceal his identity, turns out to be a stockbroker. Also husband and father who lived up in Nyack.

The investigation leads to the wife Karen Young and to the fact that he had also swindled a few people in their stock dealings including family members. But he was more than that, he was a wife beater.

The deceased was about as miserable a human being God ever put on the earth and the defendant was an appealing suburban soccer mom. It's the burden that Sam Waterston has to shoulder in the trial.

The crime was made to look like a robbery with wallet and ID taken. I really loved the way that Orbach and Martin got an ID on the deceased. It has to do with some shared vices. You'll like it to and I always liked the episodes with Bob Dishy as the defense attorney.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed