(TV Series)

(2000)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Directed well
ChristianP9629 June 2022
I disagree with those saying it was a boring rehash of the trial. The choice to have it be sort of a documentary style was to its benefit. There were no antics, no theatrics, no big twists or dramatic stingers, not even any musical score. This episode let the trial speak for itself, as if the viewer was in the courtroom, and it turned out to be just as compelling as any other episode.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
At Long Last
Hitchcoc27 June 2022
The Wallace retrial is done in documentary form with the principles each being followed by a camera. They are interviewed as the trial proceeds. This could be a good technique but it gets a little overdone without the drama that the show usually has. I agree with the person that says it is a long wait through a trial we've already seen.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Boring
zoristtot13 January 2020
Such a boring episode, they're basically repeating an old case, this time without cleverness nor new twists, there's nothing interesting here.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disappointing
duku6512 February 2020
After carrying this case over for a few episodes I expected more out of a show I really like.

This was boring...anticlimatic..
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed