"Tales of the Unexpected" In the Bag (TV Episode 1982) Poster

(TV Series)

(1982)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
It literally is in the bag
nqure6 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This episode does start off quite slowly. A woman claiming to be acting on behalf of her sister, wants to retrieve some jewels that the sister's ex-lover, a married stockbroker, keeps in a safe. In exchange for doing the job, she will let the safe-cracker, Sam, keep all the remaining securities kept inside - worth $100k.

Sam is reluctant to take Cara on the job, a mansion set in the leafy environs of a university campus on Staten Island. So the pair of them decide to dress up as a pair of students in order to blend in & avoid suspicion. They opt to take every precaution possible including making sure they won't be caught carrying a wallet with any incriminating ID.

The episode's strong point in my opinion is that it plays against expectation. I thought that Cara was possibly using Sam as a smokescreen in order perhaps to commit a murder (revenge on her ex-lover, or two lovers in on a murder plot to kill the wife etc.).

The episode eschews this for a much more humorous storyline where the couple perform the burglary and have to endure a few narrow scrapes such as not trying to arouse the suspicion of the stockbroker's gardener.

I thought the ending had more in common with an Ealing Comedy. As Sam & Cara desperately try not to arouse the suspicion of a local policeman, they sit down & try to act like a pair of impecunious students enjoying a coffee. And therein lies the twist. It's perhaps more of a sleight of hand - the setting of a university campus, the lack of ID & wallets - but Sam & Cara's successful venture encounters the one random factor (happenstance) that neither envisaged occurring. There's an element of farce as they watch in agony as their loot - literally - is taken away from them.

The late Eddie Albert plays Sam with a lugubrious manner, Roxanne Hart is good, too, as the over eager Cara, whilst Terry Quinn makes a cameo as a lothario policeman whose intervention undoes everything.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
When 'in the bag' isn't!
classicsoncall22 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Have you noticed how the episodes of TOTU filmed in America seem to have actors who seem much less sophisticated than their British counterparts? Even the ones portraying criminals and thugs in England appear to have a cosmopolitan air about them. Just a minor observation there.

This effort by a safe cracker and his nervous client was destined to fail, so waiting for the payoff here was the main draw. It must not have occurred to Cara (Roxanne Hart) that when she served as lookout for Sam Crawford (Edward Albert), she was in full view looking out the window of the Ogden mansion. I had to wonder how the gardener never saw her. This was probably one of the few times a cop (Terry O'Quinn) ever made a bust without even trying, thanks to Sam's rigorous requirement not to carry ID on a job. Good advice I would say, but a few buck in one's pocket would not have been incriminating.

Do you think the parties met the next day to take care of the cafe bill, or did the cop get nosy and take a look inside the book bag? You could write your own ending to this story, since it couldn't have ended where the program did.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The first real stinker for a while.
Sleepin_Dragon17 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Sam Crawford is given a big safe cracking job by Cara, his services are vastly in demand, he's good and never been caught, when he is given the news that the job has moved forward to the present day, and that Ogden's safe has $100,000 in securities in it. Cara only wants the jewelry in the safe, she tells Sam he can keep the rest. Ogden's place is on a University campus, Cara accompanies Sam on the job, the pair go in disguise.

In the bag doesn't have much going for it unfortunately, some cracking scenery really is the best thing about it, otherwise it is monumentally dull, uninteresting and just plain boring. Series five has been quite a strong one, this feels like the fly in the ointment, it's a real disappointment. So long is spent opening the safe, it just seems to go on and on.

There are a few mildly interesting ideas and concepts, but on the whole it's uninteresting and unengaging 4/10
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
IF HE WAS SO GOOD
francespen9 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
OK Sam is a super safe cracker and never been caught so why when he and Cara broke into her ex's place were neither of them wearing gloves, there were dabs everywhere! Hers may not on on file but it's likely his are.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed