The Uninvited (2009) Poster

(2009)

User Reviews

Review this title
245 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
make or break twist
SnoopyStyle19 October 2015
Anna (Emily Browning) returns home from a psychiatric institution after her suicide attempt. She's been struggling after her mother's death in a fire. Her mother was ill and the caretaker Rachel Summers (Elizabeth Banks) is now her father Steven (David Strathairn)'s girlfriend. Her sister Alex (Arielle Kebbel) is convinced that Rachel killed their mother. She keeps having visions of 3 little kids. Her boyfriend Matt is killed presumably in an accident after she sees him in a vision. Her father is getting remarried to Rachel. The girls discover that Rachel is using a false identity. Anna suspects her to be Mildred Kemp who killed the 3 kids in her vision and disappeared.

Emily Browning is great as a distressed teen and I like everybody in this. There is a moody ghostly sense through out the movie. This boils down to the ending. I completely understand if some people throw up their hands at the final twists. I personally scratched my head at first. In the end, I accepted it and like the movie. I could have easily gone the other way.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
.Find "The Uninvited;" press PLAY. Enjoy.
Quiestar29 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Calculating which film to watch next? If you're like me, you could've watched two movies after comparing all the reviews. Play this one. It works!

SPOILER ALERTS INSIDE??? I honestly don't think so. Better safe than sorry. Now gather 'round, and read the review:

"The Uninvited" intentionally leads the viewer down the path of what seems to be the predictable late, late-nite cable channel "B"-movie. No boogie men eat kids. No little CGI demons crawl from the woodwork leading the way for SuperSlimJinn, i.e., it's horror without the expensive toys. The distraction of predictability is intentional and works beautifully, as it completely up-ends the viewer's expectations.

It's a gratifying psychological horror movie with supernatural guest stars. The closest to a spoiler you're going to get is that it might share plot points associated with "Sixth Sense," and "Shutter Island." If M. Night Shyamalan or Martin Scorsese were at the helm of "The Uninvited," would it have been a better movie? A blockbuster?... Hmm. Doubtful. It is the plainness and low budget that actually improves the film. The cinematography is commendable, but, for this story, it has all that's needed: a young teenager "Anna," nothing less; nothing more.

Characters included in tonight's viewing: Steven (David Stratham), Steven is the once proud husband and father of two daughters, an older teenage daughter Alexa (Arielle Kebbel) and her younger sister, Anna (Emily Brown), a teenager in the making. Steve is the epitome of the perceived American icon. Upper middle-class, beautiful home on the lake, boathouse, wife and two kids. Everyone in the U. S. lives like this (lol).

Our pal Steve sees his life shattered after a large fuel container for a whole-house generator explodes violently. Steve deals with the loss through the kindness with benefits provided by his wife's caretaker, Rachel (Elizabeth Banks). "With benefits" doesn't always imply intimacy - but, in this case, it does imply exactly - that. Remember, it's an implication: nothing of a prurient nature is ever shown. Safe for kids who don't live in a box

Steve's wife had been suffering from an incurable malady that left her bed-ridden and in need of constant care. Rachel was hired to help take care of Steve's wife several days a week. Steve came home to find his wife had been consumed by a fire. The cause was listed as a faulty gas vakve that powered a household generator. Needless to say, he was likely distraught (this all happened before reel one was loaded in the camera, i.e., "backstory").

Technically, Rachel's gig was finished. No more bed-ridden Mrs. Steve - no more job for Rachel. However, the kind-hearted(?) and quite stunning Rachel chooses to visit Steve three to four times a week to help him assuage his guilt, build up his strength, find meaning in life... perhaps increase his libido... It isn't long before Steve becomes enamored with the younger Rachel despite losing his wife to the fire several months earlier. I'm not judging!

Rachel (Banks) and Steve soon become too close for comfort for Anna (Emily Brown), Steve's youngest daughter and the center of focus throughout the film. It is believed that this untimely relationship and other is what caused Steve's youngest daughter to attempt suicide by slitting her wrists. Though it might add a few review stars for horror fans to who just cannot get enough of self-administered exsanguination, we don't see this, nor do we need to.

We meet young Anna after her post trauma rehabilitation and recovery. This is one of two characters the story ultimately focuses on: the doe-eyed young teenager... What we see, what we hear, and what we believe, are filtered through the mind of Anna. The second character? Rachel, of course. She is the interloper - but... is she the uninvited? Elizabeth Banks (The Hunger Games, et al), is a very capable actress. Her role as Rachel had to be tailored to be the Rachel the way Anna sees her.

This may be why some reviewers might say there weren't adequate character arcs for the rest of the family. Again, the majority of the film is seen and interpreted through the eyes and mind of Anna, something that should become crystal clear in the latter scenes.

Returning home to the Steve and Rachel show wasn't the homecoming Anna anticipated. Rachel tosses the idea out for a homecoming party or some other sort of transparent ploy to prove "I'm your awesome new mom!" That never works. Anna is indifferent until she notices the interior of the kitchen has been remodeled.

Anna is dismayed that the extensive remodeling took away the "essence" and memories of Anna's mother, including a chalkboard attached to the kitchen wall. Asking where all of her mother's furnishings and belongings are, Rachel tells her they are in the attic. Nothing scary happens in attics, right? Right?

Later, Anna and Alexa talk about the infamous chalkboard. It was like mom's giant iPad. They laughed at their mother's terrible handwriting that listing chores and scheduled events for the day.

It isn't long before Anna makes a bold statement to Rachel by replacing the chalkboard, hammering a partial hole through the drywall. Two women, years apart in age, have met their match. Who will prevail?

Anna, with help from her older sister, Alexa, use their own research from clues left by her burned and charred apparition of a mother, begin piecing together a story that seems to prove that Rachel isn't who she says she is. Tracing back medical licenses Some of these clues are expressed to Anna by an unknown young freckle-faced girl with long red hair, Who is she? Why is she there one second, gone the next? All In good time...

If I continue, I'll ultimately write a synopsis of the film.

The bottom line is simple. All that I wrote is what you will see. You might even try to predict the ending. You won't. Procedural is predictable, unless it's "The Uninvited."

"The Uninvited," is a great watch on two levels. Adults and teens will pick up on clues and, if observant, find out early on that things aren't always what they appear to be. It's a fun and at times frightening film.

The PG-13 crowd has seen more blood and gore on video game commercials. If the kids want a good scary movie, this one will satisfy. It's nothing close to a meat cleaver, gallons of squirting blood slasher flick. It's about fear... and that fear is contagious!

You could've watched half the movie already! No more reviews. Select "The Uninvited," invite your loved ones (or your cat/dog/) to the couch - and hit PLAY.

See you at the movies...
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Exceptional build up to a "bandwagon ending".
bass-player-blues2 February 2009
I typically find newer horror movies to be cheesy, humorous, boring, and above all: not scary. You know that feeling you get when a movie starts to take its toll on your patients and causes your eyes to wander around the theater? You don't get that at all with this film. This movie grabbed me from the beginning and refused to let go. The film's music score is extremely effective at creating a suspenseful and uneasy viewer sensation, which I think deserves full appreciation for the movie's ghostly flavor. Without any doubt, appropriate music in a movie is like butter on popcorn. Would Jaws scare you without the renowned theme music? The cast was nothing less then superb. Emily Browning was perfect at playing the "sad, quiet girl with horrible visions" role. I'm not going to spoil it for anyone, but the ending of this movie really twists your mind and makes you think. I found it to be an adequate yet abrupt closure for the story despite how it is following a certain trend with recent horror movie endings.
52 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Horror story with creepy atmosphere and plenty of twists and turns
ma-cortes12 September 2010
The picture is a sleek production with acceptable budget and packs genuine chills , suspense , tension , and shocks , it's a terror-thriller very exciting . It deals with a teen named Anna Rydell(Emily Browning) , after spending a stint in a mental institution, return to the home of their father , a famous writer named Steve (David Strathairn) who is now living with her late mother's nurse, Rachel Summer (Elizabeth Banks) and both Anna and her older sister Alex (Arielle Kebel) think Rachel was responsible for her mummy's death in a seaside house blow up the year before . Once there, in addition to dealing with their stepmother's obsessive and cruel ways . Soon after her arrival , Anna also starts to receive warnings from her late ghost mother and three interfering children who affects her recovery . The Alex's sanity is also jeopardized thanks to her unbalanced stepmother , and aloof father . Another night Anna goes to sleep, she hears noises and the door to her bedroom creakily opens and meets the ghost . Terrified, she runs out of her room and tells her sister that someone has come into her room . Alex and Anna set out to look for proofs to demonstrate that Rachel is the killer.

This eerie movie produced by the successful director/producer Ivan Reitman displays terror, shocks, hard-edged drama , plot twists and creepy images . The story come to life in a wonderful fashion, giving it a haunting ominous atmosphere that often seems to mimic the tense relations between the members of the family . While the look is suitable atmospheric and scary , the argument stretches plausibility to the breaking point in a surprising finale . The film is an American remake of successful Korean film titled ¨A tale of two sisters¨ by Ji Woon Kim . It also contains the usual spooky phantoms of pale complexion from Japanese stories directed by Takashi Mike and Hideo Nakata as ¨The Grudge ¨ , ¨ The ring ¨ and ¨ Dark water ¨ . The direction is incredibly good , production design by Andrew Menzies , the cinematography by Daniel Landin , lighting, and especially the soundtrack by expert on terror scores Christopher Young , all are captivating. The motion picture is well directed by the Guard brothers , Charles and Thomas who create a powerful character study that blends chills , thrills , suspense and psychological drama in a cleverly devised plot that certainly offers more than the usual terror film . This is a frightening , psychological thriller, and familiar drama , all at their best that will appeal to horror buffs . Rating : Better than average . Worthwhile watching .
19 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Completely fooled me
begob1 November 2020
After the death of her mother in a fire, a girl returns home from the psychiatric ward to her father's house, where she rubs his pushy girlfriend up the wrong way while piecing together the events of that fateful night ...

As Maurice Moss would say, egg and my face are in perfect alignment. I only realised when reading the IMDb reviews afterward that this is a remake of a film I'd already seen. Plus at 65 mins I'd written off the story as a spooked up Nancy Drew caper, albeit produced with plenty of style and quality.

The last 10 minutes were a shock to me, and this is coming from a fan of Mulholland Dr. I was looking for clues, assuming the baddie couldn't be the obvious one, but got tired thinking about the year 1996 and fastened my seatbelt to settle in for a routine landing. Now I'm going to have to rewatch to see how skillfully the clues were laid. And rewatch the original too.

Almost everything is quality - performances, direction, editing, cinematography - except the music is just OK, a bit cliche. And I have doubts about the writing. While the dialogue between the sisters is often impressive, the father's character is frustratingly dull, and even the twist ending can't change him. Plus I'm not convinced the main character is psychologically true. I'll see when I get round to it again.

Overall: unexpectedly mixed experience.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Nutshell Review: The Uninvited
DICK STEEL9 May 2009
I haven't seen the original Tale of Two Sisters by Kim Ji-woon to begin with so I won't be able to do any meaningful comparisons. But if a remake is any indication of how the original is generally miles better, especially if done by Hollywood, hen it probably is worth my while to put the Korean horror movie in my to-watch list. After all, Kim Ji-woon's film is one of Korea's top box office draws when released.

There have been more misses than hits when Hollywood adapts what it thinks could be instant box office gold with its fountain of Asian content, and since there have been only a limited number of successful Asian horror releases in recent years, it had looked inwards and cannibalized on remaking its own shock/slasher films. This one took a long while to translate to The Uninvited, and I guess taking some 6 years indicated the filmmakers wanted to do things right instead of rushing through and come out with crap.

As such the directing duo of the Guard Brothers Charles and Thomas managed to find some balance between telling a psychological thriller, and moments where they can properly employ tricks from the usual formula book to scare an audience, with the usual light and shadows, smoke and mirrors, warped beings, decomposed bodies and jump cuts with ghouls staring down at you. Surprisingly it didn't rely on sound or lack thereof to add a further sensory dimension to set pulse racing, which I thought was a little let down in its moments to build up to the next "Boo!" If anything, the acting duo of Emily Browning (Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events, with pouty lips to rival Angelina Jolie's, and given special attention too in this narrative) and Arielle Kebbel shine as skimpily clad sisters Anna and Alex respectively, who have to rely on each other as they uncover the truth behind the death of their mom (Maya Massar). It doesn't help of course with Anna just being certified sane and safe to be released from a mental institution, and their suspect happens to be their nanny-turned-new-step-mom-to-be Rachel (Elizabeth Banks) whom dad (David Strathairn) intends to marry. Given the short run time of under 90 minutes, the pace is kept compact with little room wasted to pump in unnecessary subplots (unless set up just to provide an additional avenue to unleash horrific mayhem), focusing very much of the relationship between the two sisters, and their strained one with their father. Emily Browning, as the lead, of course had enough latitude to showcase a double-head snake role in being "nice" to Rachel, in order for some fishing of information.

That isn't to say there isn't any loophole that a jumbo jet can't fly through. Even if you have no background knowledge gained from the original Korean film, it is easy enough for sharp-eyed viewers, or those whose cinematic staple is horror films, to stay one step ahead and deduce just what is exactly going on. Which makes me wonder just how much it'll take for shockmeisters to scare seasoned audiences since they're getting savvier, and easily bored with the same old bag of tricks.

If anything, The Uninvited would have piqued your interest in the original, which has a longer run time and in all likelihood, the exploitation of mood and atmosphere that are quite standard tools for horror films from Asia, which is sorely lacking in this version. Nonetheless it's still one of the better Western remakes of Asian horror attempted.
22 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dummied Down Too Much For American Audiences
zzoaozz10 May 2009
I was incredibly disappointed. I am a fan of Asian Horror and have the movie A Tale of Two Sisters that this movie was based on. There is little real resemblance. They completely revamped it, probably because they thought American audiences were too attention deficit to sit through a real psychological thriller without a linear plot that was explained to death. They also must have thought that the concept of vengeful spirits was too scary for us because they turned it into another lame overdone psycho killer movie. They took an intense and creepy ghost story and mutilated it. What they ended up with was a movie that was boring, tedious, and predictable. Don't waste your money seeing or renting this one.
43 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The negative reviews that this film received really surprise me.
brosseauphilippe5 May 2022
For my part, I find it excellent. I who usually hate horror movies, I really enjoyed The Uninvited, because it's not a horror movie, precisely. I would rather say that it's a thriller, particularly well done, which features Emily Browning, an amazing actress who plays well throughout the film. All the supporting roles are equally compelling, from the creepy stepmother to the protective sister and the ambiguous father.

But the real strenght of The Uninvited is its ending : completely unexpected, it is very well brought and remains logical with everything that has been showed to us previously, if we watch the whole thing again. A very nice surprise for me! 8/10.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than expected, but far too content at being above average
DonFishies27 April 2009
After being cleared for release from a mental hospital, Anna (Emily Browning) returns home to her writer father Steven (David Strathairn) and sister Alex (Arielle Kebbel). In her absence, Emily's father has grown closer to her late mother's former caretaker Rachel (Elizabeth Banks). Anna is continually hallucinating and seeing her dead mother, insisting that her death was not an accident and that Rachel had something to do with it. With this in mind, she sets out with Alex to prove Rachel is not everything she seems.

I did not expect much from The Uninvited, but surprisingly, I received a lot more than I expected.

Despite being an American remake of the Korean film A Tale of Two Sisters, The Uninvited does enough to make it stand out on its own. I never saw the original film, but I imagine it looked different than this film does. It is dark and atmospheric from the very beginning, and continues on the same wavelength to the very end of the film. It frequently blends horror with psychological terror, developing a movie that could have easily been a throwaway scare-flick for pre-teens to scream through, but ends up being a fairly accomplished film. This is not a film anywhere near the quality of the greatness found in the likes of The Silence of the Lambs, but it is a film that was not just scraped out for a profit.

The story itself, as twisty and loopy as it gets, is fairly well done. Although I was not too interested at the beginning, the film draws you in rather tightly, revealing itself quite nicely over its short 87-minute running time. Yes, there are plenty of predictable moments laced throughout the film, but there are a few moments of genuine surprise as well. The film never makes the claim that it is trying to be original, but it does a unique enough job that you can only see shades of what has come before (as opposed to a standard American horror film basically spelling out exactly what it is ripping off, or homaging sort to speak). Even with the cheap scares around every corner, it still managed to make me jump back more than once.

What does not make sense however, is how some things are explicitly stated while others are briefly alluded to. A lot of what happens is fairly obvious for even the least astute of audiences, yet the film dumbs itself down more than once to fit the conventions of 2000-era PG-13 horror. When something ambiguous comes up, it is either explained in-depth, or done away with entirely. A rather crucial character element of Anna's is revealed very close to the beginning of the film, but is never explored in any capacity. We understand her motivations and what drives her quest for the truth, but there are a few background details that even after the film concludes, still left me a bit baffled. Why explain some things that are obvious, but not bother touching on ones that are not?

Despite not having starred in a lot of things, Browning is quite good in her role as Anna. Struggling throughout the film with mental anguish and hallucinations, Browning makes this young teenage character convincing in a way only someone so young could do. She is not perfect in the role, but you can see the desperation and heartbreak in her face and her actions. This is an actress who becomes her role, and never falters out of it. She carries the film from beginning to end, and never looks the worst for it. She is a young actress I hope to continue to see more of, especially in higher fare.

Kebbel, while not as powerful as Browning, commands when she is on-screen. She works beautifully off of Browning, and makes their relationship clear and pure from their first moment together. Their chemistry makes the film as surprising as it is. It easily could have been something that was clouded over, or underplayed. But the filmmakers use every opportunity to stress the strength of the relationship of the two sisters, and their willingness to go the distance for each other. Some moments are just heartbreaking, seeing the lengths they are willing to go, but Kebbel keeps herself in check at all times, and gives a great performance.

Strathairn, despite the Oscar-nomination for Good Night, and Good Luck., seems to have fallen on being the wise older character in every movie since, and gives the same old performance here. He is good as always, but seems more mellowed down than he should be. Banks on the other hand, is completely out of her comfort zone, and her performance is an obvious reflection. In some scenes, she is downright terrifying as the evil potential stepmother, and in others, she is laughably bad. There is no middle ground, and no one seems to have been able to suggest any consistency tips for her. While she gives a decent performance anyway, it could have been stronger with a more confident actress.

But what the film is guilty of is its lack of reinvention. It is a unique piece of horror for 2009, but the film never strives to be anything bigger or better. It lacks the motivations to really make something of itself, and never even tries to be something better than it could be. The Uninvited really surprised me for how good it actually was, but surprised me more in how easily it could have been even better. A lean running time, a great pair of young actresses, and some decent supporting acting could have made this small picture quite the notorious horror flick. But instead, it seems content just being an above average run-of-the-mill psychological thriller.

7/10.

(Portions of this review originally appeared on http://www.dvdfanatic.com).
24 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Browning's captivating performance can't save this turkey! (SPOILER ALERT)
Capesider7 May 2009
I saw this movie BEFORE the original Korean horror film ('A Tale of Two Sisters' ) that it was based on and I found this a bland, blunter, popcorn shocker version of the film.

The sole merit of this film is Emily Browning. She turns in a credible performance. You believe in her, makes you fear for her, and that's half the battle.

So it's such a shame that the directors and screenwriters drop the ball so badly. Everything in this movie is SO geared to a major twist in the last reel that instead of making you bug out with its rug-pulling impact, like Sixth Sense or Usual Suspects do, it instead just makes you roll your eyes.

Why? Because like those 2 films i've mentioned this flick lacks of any preceding foreshadowing or character nuance thus robbing the end twist of its intended impact. Oh, and the cheesy J Horror ghosts moments seem more Scary Movie than The Ring.

The Korean original was creepier, confusing in parts but it comes together in the end and the cinematography is beautifully framed (one impressive shot comes out from underwater and up onto a deck where the titular sisters are sitting). The Guard Brothers ignore such artistry and go for a generic approach and when they do breakaway its to copy/homage a Kubrick helicopter shot from 'The Shining'.

Strathairn (fantastic in Good Night + Good Luck) is wasted. Banks, who has proved her on screen versatility in an eclectic choice of roles in multiple pics over the past year, here goes for the fairy tale Step mother - the steel under her smile was borderline hammy but she definitely is one of the best (and overlooked) actresses in the business.

All in all - avoid this film and seek out the Korean original instead but if it turns up on cable and you have 87 minutes to waste - watch it for Browning and Banks and the fun of yawning at a schlock-y story. LOL
24 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
No complaints here!
Just-A-Girl-147 March 2021
The Uninvited is not your typical horror film and that's a good thing! I didn't see the original movie (2003 South Korean horror film called "A Tale of Two Sisters") so I can't say if it's better or worse but on it's own it's a great psychological horror film! The plot is good. There's a really great character development and the build up to the end is done really well. Really keeps the viewers engaged. I especially liked the movie's atmosphere. It was scary, creepy and intense and not your typical dumb slasher. It's a mix of psychological thriller and horror in one movie. You won't find moronic characters, cheap jump scares and tons of gore and nudity in this film. Which, as far as I'm concerned, is a good thing! I really don't understand the bad reviews! It might not be an Oscar Winner but so what?! As a horror/thriller it's really good. The cast and crew did an excellent job and I also enjoyed the beautiful scenery (most of the movie was shot at one location, a beautiful waterfront property in Vancouver, British Columbia). If you never seen it, give it a chance!
24 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The twist makes it all worth it
The_Amazing_Spy_Rises4 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
2009 has already seen a great supply of horror films, with The Unborn and My Bloody Valentine headlining the bunch. Enter 'The Uninvited', an original thriller with some mildly scary moments that is not a horrible way to spend 2 hours. The film borrows from a few other films while forging a decent identity of its own, thus making it somewhat memorable and by no means terrible.

The film deals with a girl (the beautiful Emily Browning) who is released from a psychiatric facility months after being involved in a terrible tragedy. When she returns to find her father (David Strathairn) in the arms of a new woman (Elizabeth Banks), she begins to doubt her family, her life, but never her sanity as she looks to find something against her future step mother.

The biggest allure of this film is that it has a massive plot twist in the end that really excuses the film from the somewhat weird performance of Elizabeth Banks. The film is a great psychological exercise, and the twist really makes her performance much better once you understand why her character was so weirdly over the top at moments. I felt Browning did an excellent job of making us side with her character, while making her just mysterious enough to doubt her. It really kept me on my toes. David Strathairn is going through the motions in a role that almost any decent actor could play. His only job in the film is to pretend to be in love with Elizabeth Banks, and we all know how hard that is.

Really, there isn't too much going on here with 'The Uninvited'. It does nothing new, but a lot of things right. Hell, the twist will remind you of a couple of other thrillers that seem supernatural, as the film is. I did enjoy the film's score a lot, and I appreciated that the film didn't take the general cliché route. In the modern (slightly) horror/thriller, it becomes all to easy to just borrow way too much from other films, become the 'Eagle Eye' of the genre, and become laughable in the end. Fortunately, in my theater of about 25 people, the film got just one mild and feeble laugh, and a lot more yelps of surprise.

In the end, 'The Uninvited' is worth a look if you have some time on your hands, and is the exception, not the rule, to the long standing beliefs about films released in January. I should also mention that every main character is very easy on the eyes, especially Browning, who is simply stunning in every scene. Yes, even the one where she...well, you should see it to find out for yourself.
18 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not even half as good as the film they copied
karl_consiglio18 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Well I thought it was a poor remake of A Tale and Two Sisters, which I thought was mind blowing good. What saddens me the most about this fact is that the director seems to have failed to realize that in the film he copied, the great twist was only the beginning, Pandora's box had finally been opened and the chaos let loose in ways that shake us. Here we are way too spoon fed and the full circle completed in a most boring fashion. I hate the obvious aspects of this version. This is like a dummies guide to the original. Even the scene when we find out about the sister, this one was flat compared to the original which gives me goose flesh just recalling.
29 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
TV dinner
chaos-rampant30 August 2011
Some movies you just know are not going to complete your soul. You watch them because it's a social circumstance - because you are never going to convince your group of friends to watch a Wojciech Has - or are just looking to get some images before your eyes that don't demand you work with them but passively absorb. It was only after coming here that I read this was supposed to be a remake of the Tale of Two Sisters; dumbed down is right, it's the marketable, prefab version smoothed out for our precarious amusement.

I am not a fan of the Ji-Woon film, but whereas that was frightfully complex, this is comfortably simple; you can recommend it to your group of friends, co-workers, family, and be sure it's going to be the blandest choice every time.

Oh, there is the eventual twist, as is the vogue of the times, meant to open up a chasm of depths beneath our feet. It does no such thing of course. A writer must be shamefully unhinged to write something like that down post-Sixth Sense. Elizabeth Banks is horrible as the menacing step-mother, the two teenage girls prance around like it's a Twilight audition.
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Our inner demons can sometimes make us do the unexpected
ridi-arahan1 February 2021
What worked: It's a beautifully shot and captured movie, with amazing natural space. The movie keeps its essence and mysterious till the end, which is a plus point, making it a watchable movie What did not work I must say the screenplay and narrative of the movie is weak, making it a dull watch because of the lack of substance. The movie is a simple thriller, with few thrills or exciting scenes. I would have loved the movie more if the movie had maintained the mood and climate of the movie. It's not a bad watch but an average watch Final verdict: it's an okay time pass movie
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
You're always wondering what's coming next. It's a thriller worth seeing for Emily Browning's good acting, suspense, good story and sad and unexpected ending
fernandoschiavi31 December 2021
Psychological horror with supernatural elements, The Two Sisters Mystery is the American remake of Fear (Janghwa, Hongryeon, 2003), South Korean cult director Jee-woon Kim. Charles Guard and Thomas Guard direct the new version, which stars Emily Browning (Sleeping Beauty) and Arielle Kebbel (The Vampire Diaries). As happens in most cases, the remake doesn't surpass the original. But it has its merits, and it's still a good pastime. Its American version is what we usually expect from reproductions that are basically copies of someone else's work: fun, with intriguing moments, but very obvious. As obvious as it is, the film is more like a video explaining the ambivalent traits of the South Korean, as it builds its narrative based on our interpretation of the possible issues raised by the oriental production and its path towards an open outcome.

The film begins with teenager Anna (Browning) being released from a mental hospital where she has spent the past 10 months. Anna attempted suicide after her mother died in a fire. And the trauma caused the girl's brain to block part of the memories of the tragedy. Her father Steven (David Strathairn, from Stronger Than Bombs) welcomes her with open arms in the family's rural residence. But what Anna really wants is to reunite with Alex (Kebell), the rebellious party sister whose opinions are constantly ignored by her father. But going home also brings some problems for our little protagonist. One is having to live with Rachel (Elizabeth Banks, from Brightburn: Son of Darkness), her mother's ex-nurse, who has now been leveraged to daddy's girlfriend status. The other is being haunted by ghosts, which makes Anna suspect that her would-be stepmother is hiding dark secrets. Was the fire that killed her mother really an accident?

The Uninvited is a curious product. Fruit of a late crop of American remakes based on Asian works (in this case, the 2003 Korean feature Fear), the film offers very little beyond what we've already seen in the same genre, moving considerably away from the original material and failing, in the at the same time, in creating any identity of its own. The plot, at first, is confused with examples ranging from The Scream to The Devil's Spine, efficient horrors about ghosts and curses. However, this feature doesn't stand on its own story, appealing at all times to the cheesiest clichés of horror cinema, such as the existence of adult characters that don't give credit to the younger ones, as well as several jumpscares based on the sudden increase of the soundtrack. If the film is not so committed, it is because of its main assets: photography that bets on dark tones and angles that reinforce the isolation of those characters, as well as the performances of Emily Browning, beautiful and totally at ease as the protagonist of a horror film, exhibiting fragility and strength at the right times; and Elizabeth Banks (Creeping Beings), who also convinces as the "villain" of the plot, without committing excesses in its composition.

The film is divided between family drama, Anna and Alex's investigations and moments of supernatural horror. The ghostly apparitions range from scary children to hairy creepy woman, in line with j-horror productions. But there is still room for a deformed figure that refers to Zelda, from Cemitério Maldito. Practical effects and makeup are good. Violence is moderate, but gains a certain strength in the last act. As already mentioned, the Guard brothers constantly resort to jump scares. Some even work. But the film scares even more when the terror is accompanied by silence, as in that scene where the protagonist notices a creature hidden in a dark corner of her room. Christopher Young's soundtrack is good and one of the highlights of the plot, with some tracks being outstanding.

This isn't a horror movie in which you'll be scared a lot, it's a thriller, one of those that we were quite intrigued during the course of it. The most important factor in this cinematographic genre is perhaps, for many, the climate in which the narrative is built, and this point is essential to make this a great film. But there's not just suspense surrounding him, there's also mystery. Even though the script leaves clues from the beginning, mainly trying to deceive the audience with very evident false clues taking the viewer's eye in a direction, the ending ends up being predictable in relation to who "isn't" the villain of the story. The question was really about how the facts unfolded. Longtime horror movie fans are likely to end the riddle before its time, not least because the screenplay by Craig Rosenberg, Doug Miro and Carlo Bernard delivers some clues that make this task easier. If you can't catch them, you're sure to be surprised by the final twist.

The Uninvited, directed by Charles and Thomas Guard, is the kind of movie worth seeing at least twice; the first for the pleasure of the story, the second to see how everything is conducted following its own logic. I believe that a film is a universe closed in on itself. The rules he creates, from the first frame to the final scene, are valid only for the duration of the film, and it is through this set of parameters that we must judge the unfolding of a plot. In this sense, I consider The Uninvited honest enough with what he proposes. The characters' attitudes, the way they interact and the decisions they make follow a logic determined by the point of view adopted in the narrative.

We have some crucial moments in the script, where the acting must be good to be able to convey to the viewer what the script wants. In general, the biggest burden was on Browning, which at the time of its release and still very young, already demonstrated that it was more than capable of carrying a film on its back. The way Emily Browning's character evolves is interesting, trying to convince herself more and more that she's not freaking out, and dreading going back to the madhouse. The actress' charisma helps the audience feel sorry for poor Anna.

Craig Rosenberg, Doug Miro and Carlo Bernard's screenplay explores the fine line between reality and fantasy. The ending is absolutely twisted, makes the spectator revisit several events of the film, trying to understand what happened, and then everything is explained. In fact, it will be a surprise for everyone who sees the movie. It's interesting when a movie convinces us that the characters are acting in the way they think is right, and then shows us how wrong we are. Don't expect graphic violence or lots of deaths, because there's hardly any.

The Guard brothers do a job just right, without innovations, betting on insurance, but they show their inexperience. This is a psychological thriller, where scenes with ghosts are well applied, but not frightening. Suspense works well, you're always wondering what's coming next. This is a tight movie due to its short duration, which doesn't leave time for some characters to develop and the story to explain itself better. Still, it's a thriller worth seeing for Emily Browning's good acting, suspense, good story and sad and unexpected ending. Probably, if guided by more experienced directors, it would be a great movie. Recommended for thrillers, anyone looking for much more than that might be disappointed.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Creepy and nightmarish.
michaelRokeefe13 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Directorial debut for filmmakers Thomas and Charles Guard. THE UNINVITED is a nail-biting tale of horror of two sisters with different views of the recent past. Anna(Emily Browning)is returning to her lake-side home after a stay in a mental hospital trying to deal with her mother's death. Anna is a bit discouraged when finding that her father(David Stratham)is engaged to her mother's caretaker Rachel(Elizabeth Banks). Anna's sister Alex(Arielle Kebbel), who wants to appear more earthy, wants to convince dear old Dad that his lover is not what she appears to be. Anna even has suspicions about Rachel when her mother(Maya Massar)manifests herself from the beyond professing dark warnings. A once-peaceful home is rapidly becoming bitter and estranged as it crumbles into suspicious nightmares. Remember to take what mom says to heart. Chilling and thrilling as it satisfies. Also in the cast: Kevin McNulty, Jesse Moss and Matthew Bristol.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A good looking and technically sound film, but ultimately VERY lame and ineffective...
lathe-of-heaven30 January 2010
Man... How do I put this without sounding unhinged...

Okay, first and foremost, ANY time I wish to read about a film that I am interested in I ALWAYS read the 'External' reviews first, which for me personally especially where Horror films are involved, I rely on COMPLETELY as opposed to the 'User' reviews. Those are usually much more balanced and you can count of the fact that they are genuine and NOT 'plants'. Admittedly, Horror is EXTREMELY subjective, so perhaps some may enjoy this film; although I'm sorry, but I must admit that I most certainly did not, and to me at least some of these 'rave reviews' are so calculatingly worded as to how 'wonderful' the film is in EVERY way that it makes me a bit nauseous. I don't know, maybe I just have a bad case of gas...

For what it's worth, at least for my personal taste, ANY time there is a Horror film that catches my eye I always try to see if 'Slasherpool's site has reviewed it, because many times I do agree with their taste and their reviews. This one had 1 star out of a possible 5. He had seen the original and felt that this one was a complete travesty by comparison. He also stated that as a stand alone film not taking into account the original, that it was just very poor instead of abysmal. Just thought I'd share that, since I don't know how many take the time to read the 'External Reviews. To me, his are usually right on the nose and what I really appreciate about his reviews is that whether it is a tame PG-13 film like this one or a horrendous Slasher film, he treats them all equally as to their cinematic merits. (***UPDATE: Sadly, since my writing this, the site no longer exists :(

Now, from MY standpoint. First off, the reason I even give this film 2 stars is because the production values and photography and the technical aspects of it are very good. But... sadly, that is about it. Primarily I just did NOT like the acting at all; sure, Strathairn is an excellent actor, but right from the beginning, Emily Browning's acting in the Psychiatrists office, her little predictable 'pensive' and 'ooh, do you really think so' expressions, etc., just did NOT ring true to me at all at any level whatsoever. The interaction between the two sisters including the 'acting' of the other sister, pretty much the same thing. The direction... Well, I don't know, maybe it's personal preference but I just felt we were being led along a very, VERY predictable path from the first scene in her bedroom after she had gone to sleep (not giving any specifics away of course) Honestly, the whole thing just felt like complete cardboard. Like 'Okay, let's show how scared she is... okay now lets play the scary sounds... okay now lets build up the 'suspense'...' Sorry, the film just did absolutely NOTHING for me. Didn't care, wasn't moved, didn't like the girl at all...

It strikes me that perhaps what was sorely missing was a GENUINE atmosphere. I just did not FEEL it at all. Her reactions were completely 'plastic' and unbelievable, which could have been the fault of the director either not bringing the right performance out of her (because she IS supposed to be a good actress) or perhaps in the editing, choosing the wrong takes, I don't know. It just wasn't working for me...

So, what we are left with is a very nice looking movie with good production values, but completely unmoving, sterile, unrealistic and unbelievable. The interactions between characters are artificial. The film has absolutely NO atmosphere at all, which is COMPLETELY unforgivable for a Ghost Story...
23 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Surprize, surprise, you can still make a good horror movie
peterkowalski16 April 2009
It's not easy to make a horror movie these days. The critics will hate it by definition: their expectations are always high and mostly unsatisfiable. They will call them uninspirational, uninteresting, and not original enough. With time, the horror genre has become an underdog of the movie industry. Prior to watching this movie, I had no knowledge about the plot whatsoever and it turned out to be good for me. I won't beat around the bush: I'm not a horror fanatic, but this one, I enjoyed from the beginning until the very end and I was pleasantly surprised with the outcome. The thing I appreciated the most was the great amount of mystery: at some point the movie becomes more a mystery movie than a horror movie. The plot is interesting at the very least: and it does make you think who the main villain might be. I personally had many guesses and I though I got it right, but the ending surprised me. And there's nothing I enjoy more than an ending I did not see coming. The surroundings are beautiful and the movie is very well shot. Visually, the pictures are very satisfying, another thing you would not expect. The acting is also professional, along the score: all these parts, I have no complaints about. The movie was, for some reasons I don't fully understand, certified as not fresh enough. I do agree, some moments are painfully cliché, but in this case, I found it charming. Isn't it a part of the horror movie to expect that a hand will try to reach you under the bed? It will make you jump in your place either way, so what's the deal? As long it's not cheesy, it's good enough for me. I think that if the creators maybe took a risk and avoided those couple of clichés, the movie would have been praised by critics. But who cares about their opinion anyway? The movie is really enjoyable and if that is what matters to you, don't hesitate and watch it. You won't regret it.
171 out of 233 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A horror movie with tragic ending
niru32618 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The uninvited is a story of a teenage girl Anna(Emily Browning), who had a accident memory.She returned home after a long day and found her husband's new girlfriend (Elezabeth Banks)in home.She didn't like her at all and blamed her about that accident.Then the real story begins. There are some moments which are really scary.But the ending really surprises you.I saw it tomorrow and had a pathetic feeling for the girl Anna. The story of the movie keeps you tight till ending.Emily Browning is perfect as Anna. Elezabeth banks is also awesome as Rachel. You may predict someone as villain but the ending will prove you wrong.I like this movie as an entertaining horror movie.I think you should not always watch movie for learning but spent time with great entertainment.And if you are agree than this movie is for you.watch it now, it will not disappoint you.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unremarkable, unimaginative and unnecessary
Ali_John_Catterall3 November 2009
Brace yourselves - here comes another one of those 'orrible 'uns! With some notable exceptions (Unforgiven, The Untouchables, The Unbearable Lightness Of Being), movies sporting the prefix 'un' in their titles are frequently hostages to fortune. On the one hand, they're more interesting-sounding than, say 'The Born', 'The Faithful' or 'The Canny' (and somewhere in a parallel universe there exists a John Wayne western called 'The Defeated'). On the other hand, the very application of those negative prefixes can ironically hasten the film's undoing. Which is unfortunate. And obviously undesirable.

Such is the fate of The Uninvited, another all-too inevitable K-horror remake. Here, young Anna (Australian actress Emily Browning) returns home after a year's spell in a psychiatric clinic, following the devastating death of her invalid mother in a housefire. Along with her elder, spunkier sister Alex (Arielle Kebbel) she's soon warring with her frosty-knickered stepmother, and mom's former live-in nurse, Rachael (a miscast Elizabeth Banks, in Hand That Rocks The Cradle mode).

In a scenario that would have Sigmund Freud jumping up and down and furiously pulling his beard, Anna becomes convinced that Rachael did away with her ailing charge and is plotting to kill the daughters next, the better to have dad (David Strathairn) all to her self. Meanwhile, a creeping dread pervades their New England coastal home - ghostly children, the old hands-round-the-edge-of-the-bedcovers routine and charred manifestations of mum, all seeming to point to Rachael's culpability. Is Anna actually onto something? Or did somebody sign the wrong release form? Like Identity, The Sixth Sense or Secret Window, this is one of those two-for-one deals necessitating, so producers hope, an immediate return visit once the pleasantly deceived audience has, or thinks it has, 'got it'. Unlike most of these Hollywood riddle-me-rees however, there's little that was formulaic or pat about 2003's powerful and poignant A Tale Of Two Sisters (aka Janghwa, Hongryeon).

We actually cared about put-upon sisters Su-Mi and Su-Yeon, so that the pleasing 'aha!' moment, when it arrived, was severely tempered by an almost unbearable sense of grief. Much of this came down to the quality of the acting, in particular a pair of performances of astonishing subtlety and maturity from the young leads. And perhaps uniquely, among this era's crop of South-East Asian horrors, it managed to Tazer the nerves while gently breaking your heart.

The Guard brothers' remake, by contrast, is the usual exercise in jump-scares and PG-13 thrills, more concerned with getting to the twist as swiftly as possible, like a conjuror who remembers he's left the iron on the moment he takes the stage. Depth and characterisation suffer accordingly - though the waifish Browning impresses; a tiny pink flower with fraying petals turned in on themselves. She has an unusual, interesting face, and an assured future, at least, in playing damaged poppets. Hopefully, she'll soon put such bland fare behind her; although Banks and Srathairn should frankly be sent to bed without any supper. At the film's pre-release press screening, the final reveal elicited a single, irritated 'Tch!' from some anonymous critic in the dark. That little noise pretty much sums up this entire production.
22 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An excellent remake.
pokeballzlol1 February 2009
While many people are just so put off by this film for many reasons, I was very surprised by how it actually turned out.

Although the original, "A Tale of Two Sisters", was an epic movie that delivered certain moods and feelings that this movie (and most other films to date) couldn't quite capture, this film was still just great.

One thing to understand was that this movie was completely westernized. Remakes such as "The Grudge" take place in Japan, but the main characters are replaced with an American or European cast, and sometimes the story just doesn't quite fit the way it should with that type of a cast. In this film, the "A Tale of Two Sisters" story is completely translated into an American setting, in the north in a small town. The characters are tweaked a little to accommodate the new setting, and so are some of the scenes and plot lines. This is where many fans of the original get upset and get their panties in a bunch.

If this film was truly remade true to the original, it would just be the original film itself being remade 5 years later with the same cast and same script. This film is honestly one of the best Asian-horror remakes that has been made in the past 3 or 4 years if not ever. The cast gives solid performances and there were little or no plot holes. There were actually less plot holes in this film than the original. Of course I liked the original more, but I'm just saying this film executed certain things that the first film didn't, just like the first film executed certain things this film didn't. They are meant to be similar but different, and that is what makes both of them worth seeing.

8.5/10
169 out of 232 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Was pleasantly surprised
violetblack-221183 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
As someone who has seen the Sixth Sense, tho not in a while, I'm embarrassed to say I didn't notice anything out of the ordinary during the film, 'cept that no one thought it was weird they were both chillin in the tub at the same time.

I was diggin the suspected black widowy type, ghosties, haunting the path of a murderer......which, now that I'm thinking about it, I guess she just connected some old murders and fabricated her own story of it tying to the nurse? I only have a few questions--so thats good.

Ultimately, I feel bad for her. The poor kid saw her dad being a total ass, and she lost it. The rage. Totally get the burning the house down idea was a classic teenage move, the anger, the betrayal..... She may not have even ever gotten to that point, lugging that jug up the hill (is gas really installed that way? Seems dangerous), but of course the accident just solidified the break in her brain.

Unrelated, I completely misread the synopsis when I chose it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
What a twist in the end !!!
ketgup837 February 2012
The Uninvited was see-and-you-will-love-it thriller which had a smooth run until there was a solid twist in the end which will make you watch couple of scenes over the again. Anna has been just released from a mental hospital where she was being treated after her mother died in an unfortunate tragic accident. She happily goes back to her normal life to meet her darling little sister and her father. She soon realizes that her father is having a girlfriend who is staying along with them. As she starts living in the house , she is haunted by the spirit of her mother claiming her accident was actually a murder. She starts investigating about her mother's death and finds something which unravels an unsolved mystery. The Uninvited is a remake of a Japanese horror "The tale of two sisters". Japanese movies have always some interesting stories to be told and this one succeeds in the same. The screenplay is somewhat sluggish but it's the twist in the end which makes the film worth watching. The direction is decent along with the performances. The cinematography is captivating while the background score gives you a genre of horror movies. Watch this if you have liked the Grudge , the Mirror , the Shutter. Though not scary as them but it has some fine captivating moments : Good -3.5/5
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Emily Browning Makes Us Believe
sdaaydn20 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
First I have to say that I'm a horror movie addict. I mean I'm one of those people who says 'you call that a scary movie, blah!' most of the time. It has been a really long time since a movie made me jump from my seat. Seriously. When you are watching the movie, some people may have different choices or some people like me directly will believe in Anna and put the blame on the 'new girlfriend' right away. It's really hard to guess what is really going on. I have to say I was really satisfied with Emily Browning's acting. Although she is British she has a great American accent and you really can't understand the difference. This movie is really worth your time. And you will wanna watch it again after you see the ending.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed