Kantoku · Banzai! (2007) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Glory Bound
loganx-29 May 2010
My first experience with Taksehi Kitano (aka Beat Takeshi) as director as well as lead actor, and I say file away under first class WTF right next to Funky Forest and Night Dreams (review forthcomming).My first experience with Kitano was the disquiet ting almost sympathetic teacher in "Battle Royale", but I knew right away he was an actor worth looking into, and I'm usually not very interested specific in actors. The beginning when Kitano and his matching dummy (who trade places throughout the film, whenever Kitano feels pressured or uncomfortable) think of new films to make Kitano a success.

They try gangster movies, because they are what Kitano is best at, but he has done too many of them and wants to get away from being typecast. Then they try a "traditionally Japanese Ozu like film- the kind Wim Wenders would like", but it too falls through "who wants to waste a half hour on drinking liquor and tea?" Stories about the "common folk" aren't common anymore, and the black and white is now just alienating. They go through a few romances first where a woman is devoted to a man who is usually an artist or in some way disabled and these are called romantic comedies. Then they decide this is sexist so they try films where a man is devoted to a woman, and they call these tragedies. Martial arts period films and horror films get their turns as well, since both do well in foreign markets and might even get remade, but horror gives way to comedy, and neither make nearly enough at the box office.

All of these failures are visually punctuated by the suicide/murders of the Kitano shaped doll.Then providence strikes and Kitano knows what to do, he will make a big budget CGI sci-fi spectacle about meteors racing to earth, only the meteors will have faces and are supposed to become major characters in the film. After that reason abandons ship altogether and the last 45 minutes to an hour are the worlds longest Monty Python sketch involving Kitano as the assistant to a mad scientist/industrialist, and a mother and daughter trying to make cash the easy way, by putting roaches in their food at restaurants, getting hit by cars, and finally marrying Kitano. Trips to France, pro-wrestlers, villagers hopping like bunnies, robots, and generally inexplicable events follow one after the other until the credits.

In Godard like fashion even the characters seem out of place in this slapdash world, asking about why certain earlier strange things happened, at which point Kitano transforms into the wooden doll version of himself (if only we could all do this to get out of tough questions.)I laughed a few times, mostly out of surprise, but sometimes out of exhaustion. There's an early scene where Kitano tries to make a drama about the 50's, but fails once he realizes Japan in the 50's was the wrong place at the right time.

The nostalgic and innocent decade of American pop, was there a time of "discrimination, poverty, and domestic abuse". It was also when Kitano grew up, moments which begin with promise of sentiment or catharsis segue into reminders of social horror at every turn.I don't think he necessarily intended this scene to be the "heart" of the film, and not just another spoof scenario, but it goes longer than most of the others, and after seeing it, and the conceptual loops, dead ends, and false starts. The film maker goes through for sake of "glory" it's easy to understand how it might be tempting to just turn into a block of wood, and let your Id make the decisions (the caricature is at least indestructible).

Easier but not necessarily always entertaining to watch. Kitano did in fairness get his start as a stand-up comedian in the Manzai style (think fast past Abbot and Costello back and forth banter, which in Japan goes back to the 700's.), and many sequences like the martial arts instructor and his master, or the exploits of the strange stuffed animal ladies do take on the format of a Manzai routine. With a little cultural perspective the madness does have a method.Though considering the great ode to artistic impotence "8 1/2" has now become a star studded Hollywood musical in "Nine", it's easy to understand Kitano's frustrations with the cinematic redundancy and the bastardized genre permutations that they spawn.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Satire from Kitano
doug-69714 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This is a satire of the movie industry from the perspective of Japanese actor/director Takeshi Kitano.

I am no expert on humour in Japan, but this movie seemed to be a satire written for a society without much of a history of satire. The humour is very, often excruciatingly, broad. As just one example, there's a restaurant scene in which two women are trying to get a free meal by planting a cockroach, however they witness another patron being violently beat up by two huge waiters which changes their minds. The fight goes on far too long and is more violent than funny. The exact same idea was used by Chaplin in his film The Immigrant, however, Chaplin's version was far more sophisticated and subtle. And it was made in 1917!

By no means do I feel this is a bad movie, but the humour reminded me of the way Milton Berle would get laughs on his TV show in the 50s by dressing up as a woman. And it had that same nascent feel that Berle had when he was creating the first comedy for TV. As if this movie is an experiment and part of a learning process. I saw the movie at the Toronto Film Festival and I admit there were people in the audience who laughed throughout.

To be fair, there are scenes that are very funny by any standards. For example, the karate school scene is quite good. And I think you could enjoy it just to get a perspective on Japanese culture. Kitano is making a serious attempt at creating satire and it could be enjoyed for that attempt. But don't expect Dr. Strangelove.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A notch above kitsch
K2nsl3r25 November 2007
Beat Takeshi's Glory to the Filmmaker, in the first instance, is difficult to rate. Its merits are clear, but its failures are even more striking. It is second in his supposed trilogy of self-critical, self-reflective, self-mocking metamovies. Having given up on his increasingly mainstream audiences (the accolade he received after Zatoichi), Beat Takeshi is trying to bring the "Beat" back into the mix. It remains an open question whether his methods are to be applauded or lamented. Here, in this film, Kitano widens the schism between himself, the auteur, and the movie-going audiences, by techniques of alienation that are borderline sado-masochistic. The salvaging fact is the comedy of the film, which shows Kitano's long-standing background as a comic. He has shown this side of his psyche only very rarely in his films. So, I am torn between appreciating the light-hearted spirit of the film and castigating, as I should, its heavy-handed pacing and direction.

But let's look back for a moment... The film that started off this self-reflective trilogy two years ago, Takeshis', I really enjoyed (especially after repeated viewings), because it culminated his career up to that point. This current film does not achieve, or even try to achieve, anything of the sort. It does not reflect back as much as make fun of any sense of history and continuity. It is a meta-movie, a non-movie, a post-movie... and, underneath it all, a series of quirky scenes, gags and fragmentary ideas. The humour of the film is its driving force, making it closer to his comedy Getting Any (1995) than anything he's done before or since. But one has to wade through a pool of dragging nonsense to get to those tasty bits, for which reason I cannot recommend this film as a comedy.

At parts, I found the film pretentious, self-righteous and uninvolving. In a word, it's too self-conscious to be a comedy.

During some other scenes I was completely at loss of words (whether because of the film's absurdity, incoherence or its complete disregard for the audience), to the degree that I simply decided I would postpone my judgment for some other day... Well, that "other day" is today, but I still can't make up my mind... The movie disarms the viewer, but it does not live up to much, either. It's like an extended foreplay.

All in all, one has to appreciate Kitano's vision and uniqueness, but this film works best as a meta-statement of the art of movie making and not so well as a comedy, a drama or anything else. Most viewers will probably find it to be, rightly or wrongly, an irredeemable piece of trash.

I kinda liked it. It's not good enough to classify as Dada, but it's just a notch above kitsch.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Notes from 2007 TIFF
riid7 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this film at the 2007 Toronto International Film Festival.

Glory to the Filmmaker! is the latest work from the mind of Takeshi Kitano. Featuring a slightly fictionalized version of himself, the film follows Kitano in a search for his next big hit, following his public declaration that he would stop doing Yakuza movies. In a wild and funny journey, Kitano takes us through his failed, aborted, and commercially unsuccessful attempts, featuring a number of co-stars from his past movies. The journey spans every genre imaginable, from a quiet, introspective story of a just-retired salaryman (reminiscent of the works of Ozu), to a ninja action film, to multiple relationship stories, to a film set in the 50's recalling the hardship and depression of post-war Japan, before finally settling on an offbeat sci-fi flick.

That film is ostensibly about an asteroid hurtling towards Earth, but soon diverts to a story about mother-daughter con artists who are trying to scam Kitano's character, an aide to an eccentric rich man who funds all sorts of oddball causes. All the while, Kitano is constantly changing into a life-sized doll version of himself. And if none of that makes any sense, then you've pretty much captured the feeling of watching that part of the movie.

Kitano was not present at the screening, but he (or rather, his doll surrogate) taped an interview for the festival that preceded the film, which pretty much set the tone for what was to follow. The film is about as self-referential as his last work screened at the festival, Takeshis'. The first half of the movie was surprisingly accessible and hilarious, but the second was as impenetrable, surreal, and self-mocking as you'd come to expect of Kitano's later work. Not that that is a bad thing, but don't come into it expecting anything resembling a straightforward narrative. If you're a fan of Kitano's work and his fertile imagination, then you'll enjoy the film, but I imagine many others will be lost in the last half of the picture.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Resolutely Strange Comedy
ChungMo16 November 2007
It's a question how much of an impression that Monty Python made in Japan overall but it certainly seems to be an influence on Kitano's latest work. Certainly Terry Gilliam's signature title graphics for Life of Brian and Meaning of Life are alluded to in this film.

The film starts as the narrator gives an account on how Kitano's newest film is coming along. Since Kitano is uncomfortable with the genres of Romance and family drama, these films are abandoned and he is given some action fare to work with. The results are less than satisfactory so it's decided to have Kitano direct an asteroid on collision with earth film. This takes us about 45 minutes into the real film and at this point things get very strange. A mother and daughter (the mother has a giraffe doll on her back and the daughter has a goose puppet on one arm) decide to not pay for a bowl of noodles by dropping a cockroach (that they carry around for just an occasion) into the food and complaining to the chef. But before they can complain, a bunch of professional wrestlers at another table complain about roaches in their food. The two chefs come out and beat up the wrestlers. Kitano plays an assistant to a weird chairman of a society that's devoted to performing odd acts of charity. The chairman's son looks a lot like the Mr. Gumby character from Monty Python.

Kitano speaks very little in this film. Mostly he is silent and immobile much like the metal doll that stands in for him during the fight sequences. Once we get into the second half, he loosens up especially during his pantomime comedy bits. The film seems like it's a statement about being an aging film maker in the Japanese entertainment world. Unfortunately, for me the pacing was very slow at times and could have had a good 10 minutes cut out without losing any content. I laughed at some of the film but by the end I was wondering if the film was just Kitano screwing around with ideas.

I enjoyed watching this film but I have a had time recommending it to anyone but Kitano fans.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Kitano brainstorming..
Tanhausser_Gates26 October 2007
So.. Kitano has a sense of humor after all! Just kidding. The movie has some points for the general audience but most of it requires some background in history of Japanese cinema, kitano's career, kitano way of life, etc..

So if you really want to see everything from Kitano's factory it's OK to watch, if you are really knowledgeable about all that stuff you probably got to watch it, but if you are neither one of them then you'll do fine without even knowing that it exists, although if you watch it (and have the presence of mind of not expecting much of it) then you can have a reasonably good time with it.

Kitano is having a hard time accepting he is meant to make movies of a special kind which is not the case of this movie.. He even mentions it in the movie: "I said I wont do another movie with violence and I got to stick to it" Well.. I'm afraid our dear Mr Kitano will have to swallow those words sooner or later, preferably long before he runs out of money.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sorry, Takeshi...
C-maximus9 January 2008
Firstly: I am a big fan of Takeshi Kitano's movies. Except 'Gettin' any!' his movies always delivered and I found myself collecting all the DVDs. Recently I started to wonder what happened to this unique director (sure, directing movies is only part of his artistic portfolio). His movies suddenly seem to take another direction which is more self-reflecting / audience provoking/ . . . - however, not entertaining anymore. Watching his latest one 'Glory to the filmmaker' was simply awful. Where is the story? Where the interesting camera perspectives we fans used to like? They cannot be found. Instead we are left with fragments of different movie genres and no conclusion. I hope Takeshi's self reflecting period will be soon a thing of the past and we will see another outstanding piece of movie as e.g. Hana-Bi.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Nothing short of brilliant
polysicsarebest12 February 2009
How many truly unique films have come out since the year 2000? Not too many. In an age of remakes, rehashes, and parodies, where every film by every director looks exactly the same, it's hard to find an innovative film, especially in the "comedy" genre. Yet once again Kitano delivers in this surreal comedy gem that is unique, deeply personal, affecting on a spiritual level, and is absolutely HILARIOUS.

Takeshi's previous film, "Takeshis'" was a surreal compilation of every film Kitano had made prior to it. This film is something of a compilation of all the kinds of films he hasn't made yet. The first half of this film explores that to a hilarious degree, but the second half is when this film really shines. Some of the most off-the-wall, UNREAL humor I've ever seen in a film, specifically a brief animated part near the end that is probably the greatest scene I've ever seen in a film, period.

Though for nostalgic reasons, my PERSONAL favorite Kitano films will always be "Hana-Bi" and "Sonatine", I have noticed that Takeshi has actually been getting better and better in recent years (excluding "Zatoichi") as he is starting to explore the more surreal, beautiful, and bizarre moments only hinted at in his first few films. Indeed, like many people, I find Takeshi to be the best director currently working in the world today, and his films are always gems... he's completely tearing apart the very essence of cinema, yet still not jumping into a black hole of impenetrable artiness. "Art for art's sake", maybe, but this is still some brilliant, hilarious stuff, and I'm very happy Takeshi is taking all the money he earns from his acting and personal appearances and pouring them into these brilliant films. The "critics" and Japanese audiences may not care for them, but I'm sure in 10-20 years from now, these films be looked upon as classics of cinema.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Where to begin?
politic198314 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
1994's "Getting Any?" was something of a turning point in the career of Takeshi Kitano: the work of a mad mind in a state of confusion. This confusion returned in "Takeshis'", and went further in the second of the "Takeshi Trilogy", "Glory to the Filmmaker!". Much like its Nineties predecessor, it starts as an enjoyable and playful idea, but the second half can't maintain the concept; and where the earlier film fails, "Glory to the Filmmaker!" really fails.

Continuing the meta theme, Kitano acknowledges that his career has hit something of a slump, playing himself, wandering around with a life-size doll of doppelganger, as the narrator (Masato Ibu) tells us of the various troubles he had been experiencing in making his next film. Suffering from writer's block, he starts off various ideas which all fail. This allows Kitano the opportunity to make several incomplete scenes for a number of different genre movies, from Ozu-esque family dramas, to horror, coming-of-age dramas and standard yakuza fare.

Eventually, however, something of a narrative breaks out, though the nature of it is hard to decipher, with the director followed by two females (Kayoko Kishimoto and Anne Suzuki) as he moves back-and-forth in his daily life. Though by this point interest in continuing to follow what is going on is difficult to maintain.

His second straight attempt at a comedy film, this gets off to a promising - if a little bizarre - start. His lampooning of various genres shows a man who has become cynical and disillusioned with cinema, that had perhaps started in "Takeshis'". The unconventional start of a sketch approach with narration brings laughs, but perhaps is more suited to television and not enough to carry an entire film on its own.

But some of the comedy here is good, particularly with his switching between his real-life body and that of his stand-in doll as a stunt double for any moments which may cause a less than comfortable scenario; some characters acknowledging this, others not. This is good, but the constant switching of story begins to wear. Kitano knows this, and so moves into more of a story for the film's second half. The problem is, however, that the story he sticks to isn't one to save it. In fact, things quickly descend and bring what came before down with it.

Kishimoto and Suzuki are a bizarre double act, and while they are worth a laugh or two, should be smaller parts and not so central. The self-aware humour of the first half morphs into an in-joke for seemingly Kitano alone that becomes repetitive and unstructured to the point where you no longer feel you are watching something you're supposed to be following.

You could probably copy-and-paste a review of "Getting Any?" for "Glory to the Filmmaker!": A comedy with a basic premise of a man seeking a certain end but repeatedly failing; starting off as a series of sketches, before diving into a long, drawn-out act which becomes too bizarre to follow; baffling characters; parody; and running out of steam. With the former coming at a time when Kitano was seemingly in self-destruct mode, the latter similarly comes at a time when Kitano wanted to break the international image of him as an auteur, making baffling films for himself alone.

The conclusion implies an analysis of Kitano's brain: A man who had spent most of the previous two decades split between two personalities of a mainstream comic and arthouse director, as he tried to explore in "Takeshis'". What we end up with, however, is a confused work that even the best doctors will struggle to analyse.

Politic1983.home.blog.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
200% Kitano
Onderhond17 October 2008
If I had to name three directors that had a direct influence on my taste for Japanese movies, Takeshi Kitano would surely be among those three. Films like Hana-bi and Sonatine swept me away into a whole new abyss of film-making. So starting off this film section with a Kitano film is more than appropriate. And what better film to pick than his latest directorial effort, Kantoku: Banzai!. For better or for worse, a movie that at least deserves being written about. Kitano's wacky visions Although in certain ways a complete opposite, Kantoku: Banzai! is the companion piece of Takeshis', Kitano's previous film. When some time ago he announced that he wanted to take a different direction as a director (a quote that is directly referenced in Kantoku: Banzai!), he surely wasn't joking around. He abused Takeshis' to mix up all his previous films into one big Kitano shake. The result was unique. Kantoku: Banzai! fills the void Takeshis' left behind. As a mix of all the films he has never made, the result is even crazier.

Kantoku: Banzai! shares the same humor as Takeshis'. Something I'm sure most people will not appreciate. While Kitano's films have always been quite humorous, they still fitted the art-house mold. Apart from Getting Any? of course, but even to the most avid Kitano fans, that film is still relatively unknown. Kantoku: Banzai! sees Kitano going back to Beat Takeshi once more, his character that is most loved in his home country.

At the core of this movie, we find Kitano himself. Unable to decide what to make of his new film, he cycles through a series of failed projects, trying his hand at some of the genres he hasn't done before. The parodies on genre films are nice, although still pretty much rooted in the Kitano universe. Things get really weird when his "new" film finally starts. The film turns mad, introducing several crazy characters and delving into the weird kind of slapstick Kitano is known for in his Beat Takeshi role. The doll Kitano has been carrying around finally becomes Kitano himself, showing up whenever it gets rough on the director, taking all the hits.

Visually, the film is interesting. Not the knock-out beauty that a film like Dolls was, but much in the same vein as Katsuhito Ishii's Taste of Tea, Kantoku: Banzai! is filled with wacky visuals that defy description. The CGi is quite simplistic, but again this is used to maximum effect. Same goes for the music, which never bears the emotion of Hisaishi's best work, but still conveys and adds to the pleasure of this film.

Kantoku: Banzai! is not a perfect film. The structure of the film is quite repetitive (with Kitano trying out many different genres) so in places it does start to drag a little. The humor itself isn't always spot on but within a film like this that is to be expected. But what I missed the most was a scene similar to the end of Takeshis', where Kitano shows off that he can mix art-house with slapstick and still produce a killer result. That kind of grandeur is not really apparent in Kantoku: Banzai! Somehow this is a personal film, as Kitano clearly plays himself, lost in the world of cinema. But it's hard to tell where reality stops and where the film universe takes over. Kitano gloats, he is cocky and pretentious, but just as easily he makes fun of himself. He is one of the few that can actually pull off a film like this. Kantoku: Banzai is one big happy mess of film-making, referencing many other directors, resembling many more, but defying them all by making something totally unique and totally Kitano.

We'll see what the future brings. It's not a type of film that Kitano can repeat forever, but together with Takeshis' it marks a mad interruption in his line of work as a director. The film is fun, strange and compelling. It's nice to see many of his regulars pass by (although he should give Terajima a bigger role next time) and through all the wackiness, there's still a whole lot of solid ground in it. If anything, this film will only add to the myth that Takeshi Kitano is.

Highly recommended for fans, other people should treat this film with caution. I myself loved it, but I didn't expect anything else.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Long Live Kitano!!!!
bruce_files_31 June 2007
Takeshi's gang hit again. And its a good one. But I am a fan, so don't consider much my opinion. Just keep in mind about this film that if not anything else, it will expand your mind about what is cinema today. That doesn't mean that everything is fresh or striking in those two hours, nor that there is a serious possibility that you will like it, if you ain't a "Kitano-fan"!

Then again, Mr. Kitano has stopped making films for the audience or the critics (whatever that means). And the results only his fans can appreciate it. All the rest, better go back and revisit his previous films. Then, you too, will want to shout,

"Kantoku...Banzai!!!",

indeed!!!!!
22 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Strange yet funny (sometimes very funny)
jacquesf-13 July 2008
"Kantoku banzai!" is a very strange movie to see. Much like the "Adaptation", it is - in a way - a movie about itself being made.

Takeshi Kitano plays himself as a director who's trying to shoot movies in all possible genres but never really manages to do so. But much more than about the lack of success in those movies, "Kantoku banzai" seems to be about Kitano's being tired of all those genres with this movie eventually turning into a quite chaotic meddle of all previously presented genres. But contrary to the "Adaptation", "Kantoku banzai" doesn't try to put it all together into a coherent story so we're left with a bunch of very loosely connected clips ranging from regular slapstick comedy sketches (the karate scene is hilarious!!!) through slightly crazy scenes to some utterly insane and absurd brainstorming. That may be confusing when you try to make sense of the movie but I think it basically is what the movie is about - the director doing whatever he wants to.

This all would make for a really great movie, the only shame is that it sometimes tends to be long and gets a little boring, especially near the end.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Brilliant Pastiche
hickey22 February 2010
I can see why some people would hate this movie, but there are a lot of people who shouldn't miss it. I will argue that it is immensely funnier and more meaningful if the viewer: 1.) Has seen several of Takeshi's other films (at least one or two gangster ones, Kikujiro no Natsu, and Zatoichi for good measure)

and

2.) Is familiar with classic Japanese cinema, particularly the works of Yasujiro Ozu...but samurai and horror films are skewered here, too, so if they're more your bag, you'll still have something to relate to.

Bonus enjoyment if the viewer: 3.) Has some knowledge of Japanese and can catch the nuances that subtitles can't capture--the subtitles are indeed serviceable, and my Japanese isn't good enough to understand it without them, but some of the ritual Japanese expressions I caught were uproarious in certain contexts in the film

and 4.) Has spent some time in Japan. I feel like Japanese society, ritualistic conventions, and mannerisms are lampooned often in the film, and any Westerner who is often confused or frustrated by them may find this film a relief and a delight.

All in all, though, what is most necessary is an open mind. This film does not have a very meaningful ending, and even makes fun of the loose ends it leaves undone. It was made for the sake of comedy and is not plot or character-driven, so don't expect Hana-bi. If you're looking for a send-up of Japanese cinema (including the director's own works) and some completely ridiculous, from-way-out-in-left-field humor, check out Glory to the Filmmaker. Some of the gags do fall painfully flat, but even some of the really silly stuff made me laugh harder than I have at any other film in quite a while. Some of the film parodies are pretty subtle and understated, where you could *almost* take them seriously if they weren't in the context of such a ridiculous film, but since the movie makes it clear from the start that everything's a joke, you'll find yourself laughing out loud at the little things that are deliberately askew in them. The narrator is wonderful, too, and is responsible for a good portion of the laughs in the film. Personally I found this more accessible and far more enjoyable than Takeshis', perhaps because unlike that film, the director's intentions are clear here from the start: he's just doing it for the laughs.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kitano's self-parody with some good moments but lacking his one-time brilliance
harry_tk_yung17 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Seen in the Toronto International Film Festival

After a series of Kitano classics culminating in the highly and widely acclaimed "Hana-bi" (1997), the master of avant-garde Japanese gangster movies wanted to venture into other genres. "Kikujiro no natsu" (1999), a heart-warming road movie (in some ways not unlike Brazil's "Central Station" (1998)) is a favourite of mind. After another brief re-visit to the gangster genre with "Brother" (2000), he tried something else – rather surreal "Dolls" (2002) which received a general verdict of beautifully filmed but too obscure to understand. Then came a very main-stream "Zatoichi" (2003), his reinvention of the popular iconic blind swordsman in the 60s, which was good enough to win the "people's choice" award in that year's TIFF. But it has been 4 years since then and there was nothing of any significance coming out of him This latest work, "Glory to the filmmaker" seems to serve a dual purpose – yet another attempt to do something different, and also his own personal statement about his frustration with not having any more inspirations. There could actually be a third message, a lament of the current state of affair of the Japanese film industry.

The movie starts by showing Kitano's proxy, a full-size blown-up doll of himself, going through a series of medical tests, ending with a scene in the consultation room where the doctor says to the doll, "Next time, send himself". It's kind of difficult to decide which one of them is more expressionless, the doctor or the doll.

In the rest of the movie, we see Kitano walking around with this doll, as well as appearing in scenes interchangeably, as the plot (if it can be said to have one) unfolds under an ever-present voice over narrator. Essentially, the first half is about numerous attempts he himself makes with various genres, from traditional Ozu to trendy Hollywood CGI Sci-fi, and everything in between. The second half seems to talk about what he finally ends up making, a story about a mother-daughter team of con artists whose target is a character played by himself. Playing the daughter is 20-year-old Anne Suzuki who, after some minor roles, came to herself in "poetic director" Shunji Iwai's "Hana and Alice" (2004) and later took part in "Initial D" (2005), Hong Kong's rendering of Japan's immensely popular car racing manga.

Turning back to "Glory to the filmmaker", the material in the loosely linked comic sketches appears to be drawn from Kitano's own earlier standup comedy routines as well as Monty Python, the two prime suspects. There are some really funny moments but the movie is not devoid of stretches of banality. The most brilliant gag is an illuminating comment made by one of the characters toward the end, to the effect that whenever times go rough, our protagonist would turn into a mute blown-up doll. What empathy! Isn't that what we all would love to do.

The movie concludes with a very clear message. Kitano is back in the consultation room, himself rather than the doll, to hear the final diagnosis. "There's a problem with your brain," explains the doctor, "it's broken".
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Being Takeshi Kitano
danielatala88 July 2022
Okay... that was a TRIP! Holy moly! I'm usually not a fan of movies without plots or anything that doesn't engage the viewer but somehow Takeshi Kitano managed to make a movie that is so silly and so fundamentally engaging that plot is not needed at all. One should view this movie as a sort of state of the auteur and how his relationship to his art has changed him, the viewer and his movies.

As I said, the movie doesn't really have a plot instead it pokes fun at Takeshi's own work with a critical but also a sarcastic and comedic eye- it isn't until the halfway point of the movie (or after the first 40 mins or so) where the movie settles on a really crazy hi jinx sci-fi romantic story starring a mother and her daughter and Takeshi and his own stand-in doll character. The doll character is perhaps the symbolism that most prevails during the movie's own runtime, acting as a stand-in for the director (perhaps a reflection on his own stoicism? Or how he feels as a director?). As you can hear from me I'm still not sure what this movie is really about, and maybe that's the point- just a trip to Takeshi Kitano's mind- and boy is it funny! It's filled with absurd comedy that'll make you laugh. I don't understand why it says in the genre labels of this movie that it's a drama cause it certainly is not!

Moviemaking wise it's shot really beautifully and stylised it has some cheesy elements of bad CGI and effects that are meant to be like that in the movie.

Otherwise I have no more words to describe what I just watched, you just have to see it for yourself! For me it's definitely one of my fav Takeshi Kitano movies so far and I'm happy I saw this one! For any other viewer I'd recommend to just turn off your brain and have fun, cause there's no logic to anything that happens- it's an absurd comedy skit where the only thing that makes some sense is the beginning and the end.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed