"The Crown" Decommissioned (TV Episode 2022) Poster

(TV Series)

(2022)

User Reviews

Review this title
31 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Mediocre season with a Disappointing finale
enasaljammal12 November 2022
The finale and the entire season for that matter was anti climactic

This season was not keeping up with the pace and character theme of previous seasons especially when portraying Charles, Dominic west (though is a great actor ) doesn't look at all like the real Charles & his approach to the role was not keeping up with theme and amazing performances of O'Conner - maybe with recent events they had to make adjustments to improve Charles image , portraying him in a more sympathetic way - but those last minute changes made the show inconsistent and un-engaging at times

For the first time while watching the crown , I found myself bored and wondering where is this going and what's the point of these scenes , they felt very scattered

An example is mou mou episode , although one of the best episodes of the season with an amazing performance ( i found the Fayed's storyline very interesting ) it just didn't add up to the rest of the season and I kept waiting for things to add up but the show ended without connecting the dots

I don't know if they chose to skip portraying Diana's accident all together or if they have postponeded to the next season , but I think everyone was waiting for the event that shocked the world ! While the show ended at very neutral point

Elizabeth performance was award winning ! She kept up with Emma's portrayal of Diana, while developing her own visio. You can see , hear and feel Diana in every scene

This season in particular had so much potential but it came up Mediocre with disappointing finale.
82 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Some odd casting choices but still good season
RussHog17 December 2022
I guess this is a review of the entire Season 5 of The Crown. This season had strong moments and some really good episodes but a few shortcomings the previous seasons lacked. The actress who plays Diana is superb in the part and to the credit of the show runners, I think this season does show the Diana debacle from a lot of different angles that make a lot of sense.

They cast one of my favorite actors as Prince Charles, which I guess is maybe because Charles was going to become King soon so they wanted him to be played by more a masculine guy - and while I think the actor did his best it was a poor casting choice, to be sure. The way they showed Charles in the previous seasons as sort of a vicim of his childhood and lack of good parenting made a lot more sense.

The casting of the Queen and Philip was also suspect in this season and you never really get a chance to bond with them. The two previous cast members who played the Queen and Philip were much more relatable. This season tries but sort of fails to deliver on the two main characters.

Also, and I guess this is where maybe the problem lies...the Royal Family turns into a bunch useless people. It's just sad - but you see how Elizabeth is born into a time of tradition and honor and the shadow of her father's sacrifice hangs over her to being an older woman in a world where the younger generation doesn't really care or know about any of that, the media has become exploitive, and honor and duty is just out the window.

I think this season does a fine job of dealing with the passage of time and the tragedy of Diana's breakdown with the Royal Family. And I think that this could lead to a tremendous season 6. But for now it was the weaker season of a tremendous show. Still worth the watch. Still vastly better than most anything else on TV.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This season had everything to be the best one...
lucasgregorine10 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
As I did for the 4th season, I'll use the last episode to give a review of the season in it's entirety (I'll probably only do a review on the page of the show when it's wrapped up).

The Crown it's probably my favorite Netflix Original. It's amazing to think of the quality standards while covering half a century... season after season the show never dropped the ball, it was and continues to be an incredibly well crafted, superbly acted (for the most part, more on that in a second) and thoughtfully written series! But sadly, for the first time, it didn't leveled up, the 4th year is still the strongest in my opinion.

I have a feeling they did some changes after the Queen passed away (trying to protect the new King's reputation - see episode 5), and changing a season so close to it's release would obviously be a detriment to it's structure. This time around the season does not feel coherent and the sequence of historical events don't come together as a whole, it seems like every episode succeeds in telling it's story but without trying to fit in the bigger picture (except maybe for the two panorama episodes). Take Mou Mou for an example, great episode all around, but how was that connected to the rest? Why tell that story? And I'm not saying it's irrelevant, I founded extremely interesting to learn about Sydney Johnson and the Fayed family, but it felt out of place. I'm still trying to understand the reason to introduce those characters, I thought the payoff would come in the last one with the Dodi engagement storyline and the holiday invitation to princess Diana, but nothing happened, it felt like every scene with them was a waste of time...

Let's talk about the performances! I can't believe the CALIBER of actors being a part of the same show, when you think about all the seasons combined it feels unbelievable to have all that talent in the same series. Imelda Staunton is amazing as the Queen here, I was a little bit worried about her in the beginning because it felt like she didn't have enough to really shine, but we got there eventually and she really delivered. It's impressive how we can see the Claire Foy and Olivia Colman versions in Staunton's performance, it really feels like one became the other with time. Sadly, that can't be said about Dominic West performance as prince Charles. He was not bad, he actually had incredible moments, but I got a felling he approached the role as if it was a separate show, trying to be real to the real life Charles, but with complete disregard for what was done previously with the character. In my opinion it's impossible to see any trace of the Josh O'Connor version in him. The supporting characters were all great, I wish Lesley Manville was more present and Claudia Harrison and Jonny Lee Miller were good surprises as Princess Anna and Prime Minister John Major, respectively. But the obvious standouts were definitely Elizabeth Debicki and Jonathan Pryce for me!! I could definitely still see Emma Corin's version behind her eyes but with even more resemblance to the real Diana, Debicki became the princess here, mind blowing performance, I can totally understand her popularity at the time if she had that same magnetism that Debicki has on the screen, give her all the awards please. Lastly, but definitely not the least, Jonathan Pryce!! I was so impressed by his portrayal of The Duke of Edinburg, at this point I'm convinced he can't miss, one of the best actors alive I hope he gets awards for this as well. (Okay that was a long paragraph, I'm sorry)

In conclusion, it's a good season of a great show. Maybe it's getting harder and harder for Peter Morgan to write the show and decide how to approach the controversial events as it gets closer to the present time with the recent events in the royal family. But don't get it twisted, average or good episodes of The Crown are still way better than most tv shows out there, the harsh reviews are a consequence of the high expectations that came with the stellar standards of the previous seasons.
27 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Season 5 Unpopular Opinion
marymcfarland-0186612 November 2022
First...I LOVE this show. Absolutely love it.

Season 5 fell short for me. I hated the casting of everyone except Camilla. The actor who played Camilla was amazing. The actor who plays Charles is waaayyy too attractive. The actor who plays Diana was wooden, the actor who plays the Queen just did not wholly capture the Queen vibe.

I did not enjoy this season. It felt completely disconnected from the first 4. I wanted to love it...the casting changes didn't flow the same, the storytelling felt disjointed and all over the place.

I didn't give a crap about the boat. I know I was supposed to, it didn't land for me.

Sorry y'all, I watched the whole thing just waiting for it to be over. Season 5 is not for me.
59 out of 88 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Goodbye Britannia
dierregi22 November 2022
This is a fictionalised view of historical events and must be taken as such, even if part of the audience seem unable to understand the difference between fiction loosely based on reality and a documentary (not that Netflix is that great with documentaries, either).

However, it makes perfectly sense that the series ends with the decommissioning of Britannia, showed at the beginning as a symbol of monarchy and the only real "house" the queen felt as truly as hers. It's even more puzzling then, for us mere mortals, why the queen and her family didn't pay for the repairs themselves, since they're not short on cash and the yacht was so important to them.

Regardless of financial details, the symbolism is laid down quite thick, with the old considered too remote, decaying, and distant from the modern world and the new desperately trying to take hold, as in Charles meeting Tony Blair.

It's ironic to think that Blair started so popular and ended up so despised, but all that is yet to come, inclusive of the wrapping up of Diana's story, which I hoped was going to be dealt with within this season. We're left with monarchy at its lowest, no hope of a new beginning in sight and a frightening new millenium about to begin and the dismal tone of the ending fitted in perfectly with the series.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Is that it ?
samtimoney-7975813 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
It was very good. Well written, well acted, well paced and the effort that went into the sets, cloths and settings was brilliant. However, I waited 2 years for this season and I couldn't help but feel disappointed. I was expecting more to be done this season. Diana's death and the after effect, the Alfayed's causing a big stir with Diana, they should of done more with the queen mother. Margaret was used less, once again. Where are Margaret's children ? Why didn't they further explore the Sarah furgason and Andrew story. Why didn't they do more with Anne, overlooked in tv and real life. Why was the gulf war never mentioned. They do a lot of this right but they miss out so much ! Like in previous seasons. Anne was once held at gunpoint in a kidnap attempt, the queen mothers health decreased rapidly in the 90s, no in depth look at Anne or edwards weddings or marriages, princes Margaret had 2 children. There's big chunks they just leave out. There wasn't really any exploration into how Charles handed Hong Kong back over to the Chinese either. Despite the disappointing lack of exploration, what they did do was amazing. A good 9.0/10 for this season, I am a lover of this show.
19 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Meh..
anna0101014 November 2022
I love Imelda Staunton in everything she does and this is no exception. In fact, most of the acting was terrific. Elizabeth Debicki does a fine job as Diana, Jonathan Price does an adequate, albeit irritating, Prince Phlip. When we get to Dominic West's Prince Charles though, I found myself almost constantly irritated. I find Charles to be a weak and insipid man in any event and the constant drumbeat of rationalization in both the script and West's delivery just became annoying. We get it already, he's a nasty little backstabbing man who thinks he's reinventing the wheel or something. If the story became boring and annoying it's because it spent too much time with the ever-petulant and irredeemable tampon king's endless whining.
21 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Crown: Season 5
douglasmcbroom28 November 2022
Another excellent season of The Crown. The casting for this series continues to amaze as they have recast the show's major and minor players at each stage of The Queen's life and done a remarkable job. Imelda Staunton (Queen Elizabeth), Jonathan Price (Prince Phillip), Dominic West (Prince Charles), Elizabeth Debecki (Princess Diana), Lesley Manville (Princess Margaret) Salim Daw (Mohamed Al Fayed), Khalid Abdullah (Dodi Fayed) and Johnny Lee Miller (John Major) are all perfectly cast. In fact, in the 5 seasons, I think they've only made 3 major casting mistakes: John Lithgow (Winston Churchill), Clancy Brown (Lyndon Johnson) and at the end of this season Bertie Carvel (Tony Blair). If you want to see how to play Lyndon Johnson watch 'All The Way' with Bryan Cranston.

I'm particularly impressed that they didn't try to sugar-coat Princess Di and showed her for all of her many faults and failings. So true also, for the wretched, back-stabbing, insecure, mess that is Prince Charles.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decommissioned
bobcobb30131 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Well, we did get a big discussion between Diana and The Queen and it did raise a lot of questions about how the royal family should be behaving and who really was at fault. We know which side the writers took, but at least opening the door for the audience to make their own opinion up was smart.

Still though, this episode and this season was just missing something. There could have been some smaller characters who played a more prominent role in the story and the history books will tell us that, but for the most part just underwhelming.

Hope the next (and likely last) season ramps things up in a big way.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A fitting finale
victoriajayne-3328013 November 2022
Clearly the harping and moaner reviews saw a different episode or don't understand subtle acting and writing .

I especially enjoyed the counter point of John Major dignified and clam versus the bush bash bosh of Tony Blair which was beautifully portrayed, Jonny Lee Millar was a revelation and all his scenes with HMQ were outstanding.

Perhaps you have to be English of a certain age to recall the extraordinary swapping of govt in 1997 and then everything surrounding the 31st August when the English peoples respond to events changed for ever. I look forward to seeing how this will be shown and applaud how the build up has been produced in this series.

Bring on the 6th.
26 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
We are not impressed!
GoldenGooner0412 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
All the hype and anger about Season 5, it really was a wet towel, a few of the episodes were just filler. It did not need 10 episodes. Why a whole episode about the history of Al Fayed? Why was that important to the actual story.

Also why did they need to change the cast? I am sure in this day and age they could age people a few years, this cast just did not work, yes Great Actors but sometimes you are tainted from previous rolls and the Queen watching her, how could I not think of Potter? Imelda Staunton is a Brilliant Actor but that character in Potter was iconic. Diana No and No, we know she was shy but come on talk about overplaying the role, not to be nasty but who is Elizabeth Debicki? And she is so dam tall, it stands out a mile. As for Charlie Dominic West is top quality, he does not look like him or sound like him that much. The previous cast were all superb.

You can see the Crown has money spent on it, the sets the look the feel its all perfect, but this season just don't lock you to the screen, you are looking around and checking the time. And what happened with episode 5? A case like Spare that work by "you know who" panic as words needs to be changed, instead the Prince who they could destroy, has become the King and maybe not a good idea to do that, so we have him becoming a hero and break dancing? Really!

He was hated at the time, people worshipped Lady Diana, and after her death it become even worse, he has done well for people to have forgiven him even after all these years, mind you mention Lady Diana and many have not. And why no mention as you did in season 4 who eating issues. At least you showed what a Barsteward Martin Bashir was/is So now we wait another year for the final season, but this time not with baited breath.
16 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Season 5, vindicated.
JMalax14 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Even though the events depicted on Season 5 of "The Crown" took place more than 25 years ago, the story is all too well known for much of the audience, and it has been heavily depicted in both film and television. Bearing that in mind, what could Peter Morgan do to keep fans of the series engaged and interested? It seems a hard question to answer, but as an advocate of the show, I will try to underline the highlights of these 10 episodes:

1. Prince Charles persona gets the best PR in years. If anything, Peter Morgan is a monarquist and a fierce defensor of its principles, what does not contradict that the actual royals get criticized for not safeguarding the institution. And this season has recaptured yet again what royal service means, and the rules that must be followed. However, the writer chooses to portray the Prince of Wales under a sympathetic light, a victim of the circumstances that did not allow him to marry the woman he has loved forever. Charles is presented as eager, dynamic, with good sense of humor, a man of its time... And to reinforce his good deeds, episode 5's final credits include the achievements of The Prince's Trust.

2. Princess Diana is at fault too. Surely, both Elizabeth Debicki and Domenic West will submit episode 9 as their entry for TV awards. The conversation they both maintain in the kitchen manages the spectators to feel for both of them: the looks, the silences, the tone, the smiles, the tears... reveal the drama that these two characters have bottled up for 16 years. To stress that these two people are no different from any other couple seeking divorce, the episode presents other marriages in mediation before their cases are sent to court. When the settlement is finally presented, there is press in the room, but the lines enunciated by the solicitors and the judge do not differ from what we have already heard in previous scenes. Yes, breakups happen, but this one has actual ramifications since the divorcee will become King one day, and for that reason scenes must be added to remind that Charles has put himself in a difficult position by breaking the rules. Probably, the only consolation is the revelation made by Diana in the lines of "I've been difficult too."

3. Princess Diana is a traitor. The same day that Prince William receives a lecture on Guy Fawkes night, coincidentally with its anniversary, Princess Diana shoots her famous (or notorious?) Panorama interview in secret. The episode mirrors a 17th century attack on the Monarchy with the accusations and allegations made by Lady Di in her ignited interview. Although she was tricked into talking with shameless reporter Martin Bashir, who fed into Diana's paranoia and fears, she decided to give very damaging quotes against the monarchy and the future King, what is portrayed as the lowest of the treacherous acts. Then, there they come the hints of the scorned woman in order to steal the thunder of the senior members of the royal family: the revenge dress on the same day that Charles gives his own interview, the announcement of her TV special on Charles' birthday, the airing of the show on the same day that the Queen celebrates her wedding anniversary. Can we all be sympathetic towards Diana? Not entirely.

4. Princess Diana is renegated by her son William. It might be the first time that a film or TV show has shown one of kids not at ease with Diana. Up until now the topic has been avoided all together, or she has been presented as this great mum (it might be in the back of our minds that moment when Diana, William, and Harry slide down on the water roller coaster, or when she enthusiastically greets and hugs them on board of a yacht). However, we are presented with the plausible circumstance that one of her sons does not want to hear about her mother's special friends. In fact, there is no scene when Diana tells her son about the interview; and when the kid is watching the show, he just abruptly leaves the room, disengaging from what is happening, ashamed. Instead, we see more of an interaction between grandmother and grandson. Although from different generations, William tries to update the Queen's television set by adding satellite channels. It all comes to a failure, because in the end, all the Queen wants is the traditional BBC, which are the values that she wants to transmit to the future king.

5. Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip keep on going strong. After 40+ years of marriage, it is obvious that these two have evolved, and that they do not share many interests together. Nonetheless, who is to say that a couple needs to do everything together? Episode 2 "The System" seems to find the answer. While the Duke of Edinburgh surrounds himself with like-minded people setting up his own little court, and involves himself in horse-drawn carriage races, Queen Elizabeth is rarely seen with people, unless they are family members, but rather with horses and dogs. In fact, the episode finishes with what the marriage has come to terms to be: Phillip sits down in a desk to do some reading and studying, and Elizabeth is seem joyfully playing with her dogs. They both smile at each other. For him, she is the job; for her, he is her soulmate. Period.

6. Princess Margaret follows her decay. Actress Lesley Manville is a gem (if you haven't seen 2004 "North and South" or 2017 "Phantom Thread," they are highly appealing). "The Crown" has managed to cast top-notch actors to play the role of the Queen's sisters: when they leave you longing for more, you know that they might be doing something right. In this particular season, Margaret faces a ghost from the past: the love of her life comes back to say goodbye, just to remind her of what might have been, and to regret a decision based on duty, and privilege. No words are needed, a hieratical face expression concedes us sorrow, and one could only hope for a happier life for her.

7. Social climbing is not easy, specially in England. Why include a whole episode on the Al-Fayed family? It might puzzled the audience why so much background is needed for a relationship that Princess Diana had the last months of her life. However, stories intertwined in the most fascinated way. A young Mohammed Al-Fayed is seen as a young entrepreneur selling Coca-Cola bottles near a hotel where a younger former King Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson are visiting. During that period of time, the couple meets a hotel employee that they hire as a valet. Years later, when Mohammed has made his fortune and buys the Ritz Hotel in Paris, he learns that money is not going to buy him the respect of high society, but he needs to learn how to properly behave as a gentleman. Fate has it that that former valet is now working at the Ritz, and even though the business man fires him for being black, he rescues the man and gives him a job, due to his own hypocrisy. Al-Faye's relentlessly works to make it into the highest form of society, the English; and just to get close to the Queen he buys Harrods store to secure a spot on an annual horse-show. However, when the day comes, does he get to sit next to the sovereign? No. He is being given another outsider: Princess Diana. What's the intention of this episode then? Maybe to sarcastically underline that one will never ever make it into the royal circle unless born inside of it. We are talking about a different breed of people, who in order to keep their status they need to stay above and afar. All in all, money is not the asset that makes royalty, and we need to understand that their values are not based on variables of the Western Modern Society.

8. Royalty is not as cruel and heartless as one might think. Episode 6 "Ipatev House" starts with a ballsy portrayal of the assassination of the Romanovs. Though it might generate discomfort, writer Peter Morgan chose to depict the event as realistic as possible to vindicate the lack of judgement and viciousness from the Bolsheviks in the execution of the Tsar family. At the start of the episode the narrative wants to create the suspense that cousins Windsors did not want to rescue their family in Russia as if they did not care less. Years later, when their remains are exhumed, Prince Phillip and his godson's wife begin an investigation on the matter only to find a rivalry between the Tsar's wife and Queen Mary (the Tsar's cousin's wife), and they reach to the conclusion that they decided not to rescue the Romanovs to avoid personal tensions. Far from the truth, a less bookworm Queen Elizabeth clarifies the political ramifications that saving the Russian royals could have had for the Windsors in England, and how distress Queen Mary was when she learned about the outcome. On the whole, here we have another example of Peter Morgan as an advocate for Monarchy: in order for the institution to survive one has to put Monarchy above all.

After spending some time thinking about this season 5, it seems that it might not be as obviously good as its predecessors: the further in time, the more legendary it can become. This season, however, asks us to put special attention on the subtleties, on how scenes relate one another, because creator Peter Morgan has his own agenda, and he just wants to share it with us.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A passable season
Kingslaay21 October 2023
Season 5 has not been the strongest season but also not the weakest. Most of the episodes are middling to decent with elements of quality scattered around. In my opinion, Mou Mou was the episode that stood out and the strongest. If they continued episodes of this quality it might have been a stronger season. I would have liked to see more historical connections and political involvement. The strength of The Crown has been its connection and influence to historical events due to its longevity and its influence over political leaders.

I feel Dominic West stole the show and gave a very good performance as Prince Charles. Elizabeth Debicki was passable as Princess Dianna, nothing too special or terrible either. Imelda Staunton was decent as The Queen. I look forward to the final two installments of The Crown.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
That's it?
stsorrell13 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
What a lackluster and disappointing conclusion to the season! This season has had a few episodes that were forgettable, but I'd never expect the season finale to be one of those. The decommissioning of the Royal yacht was presented as the high point. Really? That's all you've got?

Tony Blair makes an entrance into British government, but we only get a glimpse of what might be to come on season 6.

This entire season seemed extremely disjointed. There was no flow from episode to episode. Such is the case with episode 10...other than the fact that Charles was now divorced, the episode didn't carry any idea forward from previous shows. Of course, we all know what is eventually to come, but getting there has been quite boring and stiff. This is certainly not The Crown that I had grown to love in seasons 1-4. This is an entirely different animal, and it's made me less excited for final season...whenever that may come.
45 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Crap!
duanerocks13 November 2022
First off,I loved the first two seasons, as Claire Foy was absolutely wonderful as the Queen , sadly the show couldn't keep the same feeling throughout as the dismal season five has shown ,none of the actors have the same feel like they did in the beginning!

I was so looking forward to this ,now I don't know if I care enough for the final season? Hopefully the writers can bring out a better quality,I have a good feeling on how they'll end it,but they need to get better performances out of the actors!

I sure hop we don't get another GOT ending have watched it all to see it ruined because of quality!
10 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Too much Diana
privatepracticedoc5 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I know many people are totally over the moon about Diana but this is just too much for me. I know she was a star and attracted a lot of attention, but there was more going on. And an entire episode about Mohammad Fayad is just over the top. Ok, Dodi was her boyfriend but in my opinion he was overdone as well. As a clinical psychologist I have my diagnosis about Diana and I cannot ethically share it.

Her death was horrible. I remember the news coverage. However, let's give Prince Charles, (now His Majesty Charles III) and the Royals a break.

Diana was no saint. She was not the victim. Her illness caused her to create many of her problems. She was anorexic and bulimic,and that is just the basic start.

This season focused on Saint Diana. It's a shame. They could have done a better, more balanced job in the storytelling.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
There's The Smoke, Here's The Fire - "The Crown" S05 Review
JoshuaMercott18 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
First Impressions: The showrunners turned the safety off this season. Though a tad ill-timed, given Her Majesty's passing, "The Crown" season 5 nonetheless struck chords that have been ringing for decades. Continuing the brilliance and deep-dive excellence this show has come to be known for, this season took viewers down memory lane, and a dark one at that.

((crew and cast details in the full review on my blog))

Plot Summary & Analysis: They didn't delay to take us directly into the 80s and mid-90s during the Diana and Charles era (if I may call it that). Some prominent rumours and hearsay were woven into the plot. This was part of the reason why the show was booed by several viewers, most of them passionate Brits who wouldn't have tolerated one wrong thing uttered about the monarchy within spitting distance.

Other than that, actual truths and verified facts were also included in season 5 of "The Crown". This included the distinctly awkward and uncomfortable bond that Charles and Diana tried to salvage but failed to save.

Then there was Diana's connection to Mohamed Al Fayed (Salim Daw), whose son she later fell in love with. On a lighter note, Amir El-Masry gave a superb performance as the young Mohamed Fayed. His older version, in his turn, exuded an enthralling screen presence.

Al Fayed's entry was the source of much contention this season. After all, his real-life son was almost married to Diana, who chose to wed him a while after the deep dissatisfaction she'd experienced following her divorce from Charles.

Dodi Fayed (played by Khalid Abdalla) only added fuel to the growing fire, then and in this season. Khalid Abdalla gave a great performance as Dodi. The man had been in the actual car when the dreaded 'accident' took place (1997) that ended his life and that of the revolutionary Diana Spencer. I'm sure this entire segment will be scripted in season 6 of "The Crown".

Personally, the current King of England had an affair with the current queen-consort, but few care to stress on that point as much as they do Diana's romantic choices. There was so much complexity in both cases that nobody can ever really say who was more at fault anyway. The price of celebrity, I guess, and some of its downsides.

That private phone-sex call Charles and Camilla shared saw a transcript of it being leaked by some radio hobbyist who'd picked up their mobile-phone conversation. The events surrounding this explosive situation was aptly covered in the fifth episode. To me, the "Camilla-gate Scandal" was something anyone would do with someone they were attracted to. But given the era and the people involved, the implications were what created such a fuss around this circumstance.

I liked how they recreated and reused a blend of dramatized sequences and original stock footage to convey some of the earliest years of Elizabeth II's reign. During such instances, it was wonderful to see Claire Foy again as the young queen.

Also, when they eventually made the royal family's connection to a certain Russian Czar, I admit it took me by surprise. I knew the link existed, but E06's dramatization of it provided clearer insight. The Czar in question was Nicholas Romanov, and his family had been in hiding as they awaited extradition, in this case to England. Remember, this was the same family who triggered the Russian Revolution. On a positive note, the youngest daughter Anastasia was part of this storied legacy. What happened to her is still a mystery, because some say she escaped the carnage.

Elizabeth Debicki's every costume and look evoked yester-year Princess Diana in sublime and meaningful ways. Her performance was great, but - even without comparing it to what Emma Corrin achieved in season 4 - it felt a little off, but thankfully not too much. Debicki's modulation was flawless, though.

Before even starting S05, I was anticipating that explosive Martin Bashir interview to be mentioned at some point, but they did one better and gave it all the careful attention needed to enrich this season.

I also appreciated everything they did in E09. Focusing on the pain that divorce has on everyday people was oddly refreshing and doubly relevant. The actors they brought on to play different couples in the midst of their own divorces did exceptional work.

Netflix did not take a risk with season 5. Rather, I'm sure they knew full-well what they were getting into. This was a story about not just any ordinary failed marriage, but one that tested an ancient British monarchy with, of all things, change and modernization.

Then there was that phone-bugging hint, which made sense when I sat back and thought about it. Diana apparently had her doubts.

Be aware that many of the scenes this season cannot possibly be accepted as having truly occured. That's why most such creative endeavours take liberties and dramatize such content. With "The Crown" season 5, many such liberties were taken but with an eye to capture the truth, or at least something as close to it as they possibly could.

All in all, the many truths (dramatized and otherwise) and emotions that were contained in "The Crown" season 5 were deserving of appreciation. Each episode was exceptionally scripted and beautifully directed.

Final Notes: From the middle of episode 1, the season set a strong tone and revealed its trajectory. It was going to be a game of points and counterpoints, with the scores being lost somewhere during the frenzy that began in earnest from episode 2. It was certainly a heavily dramatized take on things.

They can stamp the 'fictional dramatization' label on the series as much as they want, but it won't change the fact that plenty of truth went into creating season 5 of "The Crown".

Oddly enough, they made Charles look like a hero in need of redemption. The man did have several points in his favour, if this season's take on his character (especially in E05) was anything to go by. However, only time will tell if his real-life counterpart plans to make good on the rest of his past promises. The Prince's Trust has indeed proven to do good so far.

Though I'm certain this season will irk and unnerve people, especially Brits and anyone who admired Diana Spencer, keeping an open mind and going in with detached judgement helped me spot the outstanding messages and appreciate the almost journalistic captures that were contained in this brilliant but conspiracy-cursed season.

Some people still ask, "what's all the hype for around Diana, anyway?" She represented, for a time in however many centuries, a future queen who could have been modern, hailed from an ordinary family, will have spent time among the people regardless of their race or circumstance, and genuinely stood as a brand for 'New Britannia'.

Her possibly receiving the crown years later, if all had gone well, would have heralded a great and mighty change in how the world may have seen England, and how England would have interacted with the world. If Diana's actions were anything to judge by, she led with her heart and always put people and self-identity, not blind tradition, first.

In keeping with the spirit of several scenes in season 5, I believe it was a cunning but sincere way to give the British people (and others around the world) some measure of closure regarding the whole Charles-Diana mess, and other factors associated with the British royal family.

After finishing this season, I saw how it could come across as insulting, particularly to those Brits who are pro-monarchy. At any rate, S05 of "The Crown" will make you miss the late Queen Elizabeth II all the more while giving you a fresh dose of understanding about some of the other facets of the monarchy. This was particularly true of Diana Spencer's life and death, the shadow of which now looms large over season 6 of "The Crown".
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Decreasing Return on Time Invested
Sarah42323 November 2022
I adored the first seasons of The Crown.

It was an attempt to tell the story of Queen Elizabeth through a series of head canons based on history. It was well written enough to be believable, while also juicy enough to be fun.

Yes, the writers took their "characters" seriously, but not so much that it got in the way of the story.

This season, however, seemed duller than those past.

I started to watch, stutter/stopped, then finally got into it one long rainy day.

The cast is splendid. The settings fine.

But the personalities just don't come to life the way they have before.

I did like the way we got flashbacks to prior season clips in explaining a character motivation. I liked that we could see the change and growth, alongside the story/plot of this span of years.

But somehow the season five telling was somehow more lifeless than before, and I was perpeturally left with a feeling of "that's it" as an episode was through. More because of the choices they made on breaking out what they were telling than what was covered.

The other seasons certainly weren't jam packed or overcrowded. But the pacing on this just didn't quite fit.

And the last episode, where we were left at the finale?

Frustrating.

It was just kind of frustrating.

I'd certainly recommend the series and will probably rewatch these episodes myself, maybe buy a dvd if available.

But this was just a let down of a season after several years of being a much anticipated "guilty pleasure" of a show.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I Feel Bad
Hitchcoc27 November 2022
I know a hundred people have already said it, but there is no spark to the concluding episode of Season 5. We have a group of unlikeable characters interacting, selfish and self important. There must be a horsey faced actor somewhere who could have played Charles. I know casting can't be overly precise, but this guy reminded me of a bad insurance salesman. Diana is looking so silly, although there is a scene with the paparazzi where we see what she goes through day by day. The Queen is OK. Tony Blair is also lacking personality and his discussion with Charles made me start to nod off. I was in Hong Kong less than a year before it went back to China and I thought much more could have been done with the emotions of that reality. After loving him on Elementary and Trainspotting, I thought Johnny Lee Miller was a breath of fresh air. But the script has little to offer and I guess Diana will meet her fate in the final season.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Seriously?!
leatherunicorns14 November 2022
The crown... well we all know why we love it. The cinematography, the acting etc etc. This is not "The Crown" as we know it. Dreadful story telling, if there is even a story here. Your left after each episode with a "Thats It???" Really could not get my head around Mou Mou episode, what exactly is the point here? The only good bits were seeing past characters.

The History of the Tsar was the strongest episode in my opinion & thats not even a story, its rather a history lesson of what happened.

Season 1,2 & 4 are incredible stories. It really needs to end now, be decommissioned & not be destroyed by its own success.
31 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
exceptionally unimpressed
lakeshore-9871110 November 2022
Perhaps because these events are still fresh in my mind and all the hype around how shocking series 5 is, I was bored and could not believe how unsatisfying this series is. Its hard to get a review together without spoilers, and it did clarify nicely the treacherous Bashir, what a dreadful swine this man is. Mahommad el Fayed comes across as a hard old horse trader who gives spoiled Dodi a hard time, probably necessary as Dodi comes over as a spoiled son indulged far too much by his doting pa. Dominec West is a great actor and played Charles quite sympathetically, he always gives awesome performances. Elizabeth has nailed Diana to perfection, however, all in all, the feisty Princesses Anne and Margaret shine personality wise as they did in the previous series. Overall, however, i wonder what all the fuss is about, I liked this season far less tha any of the prev ious ones. A giant downer.
40 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bored
simontwright23 November 2022
What a massive letdown series 5 has been. It's boring and just drags on and on. Very poor. 10 episodes and not a good one amongst than. Let's hope series 6 returns to the form of the earlier series.

I know it's mostly make believe but some of the dialogue is dreadful and does not paint Charles in a great light as he comes across as a spoilt child not getting his way in becoming King when he wants and believing he did nothing wrong in his marriage to Diana.

It's a shame as the previous series were excellent which is why I watched this series. I might think twice about series 6 although it surely can't be as bad.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Just Yuck. Yuck.
helenahandbasket-9373419 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I can't get over the horrific casting of the season on the whole- very few felt genuine or even remotely close to character; The Queen, Phillip, Charles, Diana, even Dodi. All felt false, so very short and contrived, as if they tried to take real people and turn them into what they wished they were. Even Tony Blair feels like such a drooling putz, and in light of Johnny Lee Millers excellent portrayal of Majors (one of the rare 'hits' in a parade of misses in casting) one would think this would have been a more careful selection for portrayal.

I know I've stated this before but it definitely bears repeating- this entire season feels like revisionist history in order to portray Charles and Camilla as more sympathetic. Since Diana is no longer around to offer any contrary opinion, may as well make him into something he isn't. The very previous season saw Charles portrayed much closer to his very public image- and yet suddenly, we're too believe he's suddenly morphed into a more intelligent, confident, self-assured sovereign-in-waiting? Bah.

I'm so dismayed by the attention given to Brittania, as well. I'm supposing we're meant to feel a strong connection to this boat, yet it feels laborious and insistent.

I've been such an eager fan of previous seasons- barely able to contain myself in anticipation for the next season, consuming all the episodes in less than 24 hours, but this was just abysmal by comparison. I just can't imagine even bothering to watch the final season, and may have to just call it a day after this one. What a pathetic excuse for a season that was so highly anticipated and after such a lengthy delay, it fell so far from where previous seasons landed.

Mou Mou was the singular bright spot in this travesty of a season.
20 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The royal scrooges
Xamalion16 November 2022
The whole season was ok, but I don't get why the Brittania was chosen to be the bookends for it. All the silent weeping about it. The royal family and the queen herself are billionaires. All the talk about the system and dignity, but you are not willing to pay for your own yacht? It makes the whole family look bad, greedy and totally out of place. And that's probably more true than most of the other things we see on the show.

Also, the whole discussion about needing disclaimers of this show being fiction are ridiculous. This clearly was and is an interpretatio of events, based on archived material and filled in with how it could have been. We will never ever really know. If you need to be reminded about this by a disclaimer you should check your mental health.

The show is clearly degrading in quality, especially over the last two seasons, but I hope they will find a proper ending in season 6. I don't think they should move on after Diana's death, it's all to recent.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Call that a season finale?
farrellgreen10 January 2023
I love the Crown, but I had to force myself to watch the final episode because I was so bored with it. My disappointment with the final episode has driven me to write this IMDB review.

It is like a midweek lukewarm bath. A 3-day old open can of Coke. Zero fizz. I think they accidentally cut out the ending.

I agree Prince Charles is shown overly sympathetically, a good looking (?), Resilient (?), Mature Progressive Character.

The Queen's portrayal definitely lacks the personality of previous seasons. Quite dull really, only emotional for boats...

Season 6 needs to start with a bang to redeem itself.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed