Un buen hombre (2009) User Reviews

A good man

[jotix100 · 6/10 · 10 July 2010]

Vicente, a law professor at a Spanish university, is at the center of this psychological drama. When we first meet him he is addressing a class with conviction. Vicente, who is up for tenure, gets involved, against his will, into a despicable act he witnesses. Vicente's good friend and mentor, Fernando, an older man, married to a younger and attractive woman, is a tormented soul. Vicente watches in horror as Fernando murders his wife one day when he visits his friend unannounced.

The situation between mentor and disciple changes dramatically. Vicente cannot get through his head how an intelligent man is able to get away with the crime. To make matters worse, Vicente, a devout Catholic, starts questioning himself by not telling what he knows to the police. Fernando, a coward, prefers to keep a low profile, when Vicente decides he wants nothing to do with his friend.

The Spanish production was written and directed by Juan Martinez Moreno. The best thing in the film are the performances the director got from his two principals. Unfortunately, the plot is paper thin, in that the actions of a professor of criminal law does not make any sense because coming from an upright individual whose moral standing is at stake, the two individuals that should know better, do everything worse than amateurs.

Tristan Ulloa, who plays Vicente, has some good moments as the tormented man that is carrying a big secret. Emilio Gutierrez Caba, appearing as Fernando, makes an impression as Fernando. Others in the cast include Nathalie Poza and Alberto Jimenez. The cinematography is by Gonzalo Berridi, and the musical score is credited to Sergio Moure.

A Coruña rainy weather, a sudden happening, a sound story.

[davidtraversa-1 · 7/10 · 5 November 2010]

The premise of this film is a fascinating one. How good is "a good man" (The film title), how bad is a bad man? Where is the thin line that divides an individual to make him either a criminal or a decent citizen?

Can anyone of us, according to the circumstances, kill a person? Will we take it naturally and continue with our daily routines or, on the contrary, it will make us to become tortured and restless with the thought of it?

I enjoyed this movie so much you don't have an idea!

The performances are superb, the close-close ups scrutinize the characters features searching for their deepest thoughts, their doubts, fears, ambitions.

There was only one scene that I found Deus ex Machina, and it happens at the police department, when an interrogated witness leaves the inspector's office and around a partition she bumps against a secretary carrying a pile of documents and photos.

When you see it you too will notice the extraordinary consequence of this encounter, too recherché to fit comfortably as a solution for that particular clue.

One feels embarrassed for the script writer that used such a cheap, worn out trick when the rest of the film is so good.

I highly recommend this picture. Very entertaining, very refined and for somebody that likes the Spanish language, the actors accents are splendid and so civilized...

Next to a Hollywood production with this type of script, this film is a masterpiece.

A harsh indictment of the Manichean worldview

[Armin_Nikkhah_Shirazi · 8/10 · 4 May 2022]

A GOOD MAN tells the story of a law lecturer who accidentally witnesses his mentor, father-figure and best friend murder his own wife, but keeps silent about it. Eventually, the ramifications of the murder slide out of control and begin to impact him as well.

The very first scene, a speech the law lecturer gives to an incoming freshman class, sets up the worldview that is going to be demolished in this film. "There is good and and there is evil. Nothing else", he says, not realizing that life will soon severely test him on that view.

Take the murder: after he failed to report what he witnessed, thereby protecting a murderer, is he still a good man?

He rationalizes that he "owed it" to his father-like friend to keep quiet, and thereby convinces himself that he is not evil. Thus, the only other possible option in his Manichean moral universe left is that he is a good man.

Later, after her body is found by a river, they both go to the coroner to identify her, and he finds out that she had just died. Had he reported it right away, she would have survived. Is he still a good man?

Since his view of morality permits no shades of grey, and since he still cannot bring to see himself as evil, he is a good man, albeit it is harder now to convince himself.

Still later, the police apprehends a suspect who is very likely to be convicted of the murder. So, now, his failure to report what he saw is about to land an innocent person in prison for murder. Is he still a good man?

And so the story continues in twists and turns faintly reminiscent of the Coen brothers, escalating the consequences of his initial moral failure so that it becomes ever more difficult for him to continue justifying himself as a good person.

Granted, for some of the turns to work, he and his friend have to do certain fairly dumb things, but overall the story is a well-constructed and relentless indictment of the Manichean worldview.

And it is not just an indictment of that worldview in the abstract: the protagonist is devoutly religious and goes to mass each Sunday. There are several scenes set in the church which leave little doubt that ultimately, the film indicts the institution that propagates this kind of worldview.

The technical aspects of the movie, the acting, cinematography and direction are all fine. A remarkable aspect of the film is that even though it takes a clear moral stand, it does so largely by showing, rather than telling, and that makes it almost devoid of preachiness.

In my opinion, Manicheanism, like organized religion itself, is a tool to help control the masses; one which is especially effective in today's highly polarized world. The film's account of how a black-and-white moral attitude can lead to unnecessary evil is fictional, but there are many real-life examples of people doing evil things while seeing themselves as morally good due to their inability to accommodate anything between good and evil.

We need more films like this.