As others have pointed out, the writers do us no favors when it comes to our ability to suspend disbelief. The sloppy sillinesses include:
1. Not believable that the Lakota men would not see two trails leading away from the massacre in opposite directions. Why go after the wagon train?
2. Not believable that a seasoned wagon master would abandon the train, riding off to find the murderers. Why not stay put until the Lakota return, explain it wasn't your people who did the killing and offer to help the Lakota track down the killers? At least you maintain strength in numbers. And what if you didn't find the killers, or the killers ended up killing Shea et al? How does that in any way keep the Lakota at bay? And, Shea tells a hired hand who does not speak Lakota to do the best he can communicating with them when the Lakota arrive back at the scene of the massacre. Really? They find their families massacred and they're going to stand there while some white guy talks incoherently? Of course, it turns out that at least two of the Lakota warriors speak English, so the settlers would have been able to communicate just fine.
3. How did the Lakota track down cookie first when he had a huge jump on the rest of the train leaving and was moving much faster than them? Wouldn't the Lakota have encountered the train before they encountered cookie?
4. Why does Elsa not spur her super fast horse Lightening on to a speed greater than a quick trot when leading the Lakota away from the train? A big deal is made about his speed in earlier episodes.
5. Gut shot with an arrow. What's that like?
6. The cattlemen massacre the Lakota women and children because they want to massacre the men, who will no doubt track them down.
Er, wha? First off, why not surprise attack the Lakota camp while the men are there? At least you'd kill some of the men. How is it better to massacre the women, putting the warriors on an enraged war footing to come after you? If you're looking for a fight, why ride 10 miles or so away from the camp? Why not lie in ambush near the camp? Made no sense at all.
1. Not believable that the Lakota men would not see two trails leading away from the massacre in opposite directions. Why go after the wagon train?
2. Not believable that a seasoned wagon master would abandon the train, riding off to find the murderers. Why not stay put until the Lakota return, explain it wasn't your people who did the killing and offer to help the Lakota track down the killers? At least you maintain strength in numbers. And what if you didn't find the killers, or the killers ended up killing Shea et al? How does that in any way keep the Lakota at bay? And, Shea tells a hired hand who does not speak Lakota to do the best he can communicating with them when the Lakota arrive back at the scene of the massacre. Really? They find their families massacred and they're going to stand there while some white guy talks incoherently? Of course, it turns out that at least two of the Lakota warriors speak English, so the settlers would have been able to communicate just fine.
3. How did the Lakota track down cookie first when he had a huge jump on the rest of the train leaving and was moving much faster than them? Wouldn't the Lakota have encountered the train before they encountered cookie?
4. Why does Elsa not spur her super fast horse Lightening on to a speed greater than a quick trot when leading the Lakota away from the train? A big deal is made about his speed in earlier episodes.
5. Gut shot with an arrow. What's that like?
6. The cattlemen massacre the Lakota women and children because they want to massacre the men, who will no doubt track them down.
Er, wha? First off, why not surprise attack the Lakota camp while the men are there? At least you'd kill some of the men. How is it better to massacre the women, putting the warriors on an enraged war footing to come after you? If you're looking for a fight, why ride 10 miles or so away from the camp? Why not lie in ambush near the camp? Made no sense at all.