Masters of the Air (TV Mini Series 2024) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
498 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Masters of the Ground
philip-baxter18 April 2024
I love Band of Brothers, I genuinely believe it's a masterpiece. Memorable characters, incredible viceral battle sequences, great score, and there's a real arc to it. You follow mostly the same group of men from training to the end of the war.

Years later we got Paciffic, which is fine but never really reached the heights of Band of Brothers. The cast was much less likeable, the setting less interesting, the story arc less captivating, the music less stiring.

And now many, many years later we get this final part of the trilogy, and as much as I was looking forward to it, it's a bit of a miss-fire.

It starts off pretty well, the battle sequences are spectacular for the most part and I was settled in to follow these men through the war. Sadly the show had other ideas, and as cast members started dropping like flies they were replaced by new faces again and again. Not the fault of the show necessarily, a lot of men died during WW2, but it certainly makes forming any sort of attachment to the cast more difficult.

Then there are the battles, and the lack of them. By about the 1/3 point the show really starts trimming the battles down considerably to the point where by the half way point they barely exist. It reaches peack silliness when characters leave to go on a mission, only for the show to cut to the aftermath without showing us so much as a single second of them in the air. Even D-Day falls foul to this with barely 10 seconds of the battle shown.

Perhaps to compensate for this there is plenty of ground based things to watch. There are some prisoner of war camps, a rather pointless romantic side plot, and lots of chit chat in the barracks, but this is supposed to be telling the story of WW2 from the air.

The cast is a mixed bag too. Austin Butler I can only imagine has it written into his contract to never have so much as a scratch on him or a single hair out of place which looks increasingly ridiculous as the war goes on, and he's also still acting as if he's playing Elvis. The rest of the cast is better if unmemorable. Even the score feels a little phoned in.

This isn't a bad show, it's just not what it should have been. It clearly lacks the budget required, which is odd given the pedigree and Apple's deep pockets, and perhaps it also it lacks ambition and talent. It's the worst of the Hanks/Spielberg WW2 trilogy by some margin, but is nevertheless still worth a watch if you're interested in the time period.
24 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It's no BoB but still worth watching
Rob133114 April 2024
I've been counting down the days to Masters of the Air ever since I saw the first trailer. Well, it's finally here and it definitely lives up to all the hype. This limited series will definitely be nominated for every major award there is. You can tell this was expensive to make. Like many have already pointed out it's brought to you by Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg. While it's not quite as good as their other World War II series, Band of Brothers, it's still pretty darn good. The way this series shows all the struggles and humanity of war is brilliant. I've used the word a few times now because that's what this series is...brilliant. I can't say enough about the cast either. They do a great job pulling you into their world and make you really care for these characters. Don't miss this series.
46 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
My father, 32 missions in a B17, would have enjoyed it
RoundTripTicket18 April 2024
He didn't think too much of the Hollywood "Memphis Belle". The B-17 movies he regarded the best are:

Memphis Belle (1944) 12 O'Clock High The War Lover

It's pretty sad that living memories of B-17 crews are gone now.

Some comments I can make based on long conversations with my dad about his combat experience:

1. The strain on the crews was terrible. They knew the odds against living through their tour were heavily against them. The airmen dealt with their fear in different ways, and it broke some of them. My dad just expected to die. The actors in MotA looked like they were having fun.

2. The odds of surviving the first 5 missions were about the same as surviving the rest of the tour, i.e. The crews learned. The series presented it as simply randomness in a shooting gallery. I'd like to have seen some bits about how the crews handled it and learned.

3. The show didn't really show much of any airmanship. Nor any of the variety of techniques the Luftwaffe used to penetrate their defenses. Such as the Luftwaffe pilots would aim for the B-17 cockpit. Nor anything about the aircrews fighting to bring home their damaged airplane and wounded crew.

4. Nothing much was said about how the crew coped with 60 degrees below zero and the lack of oxygen.

Some things are just lost knowledge. My dad would bring along two flak jackets. He didn't wear them, he put them on the floor and squatted on them. This is because the flak was designed to explode below the aircraft and shred it from below. I expect other crews did that, too, they weren't stupid.

He summed it up saying he wouldn't trade that experience for anything, and would not do it again for anything.

But still, the detail of the aircraft and beautiful photography made this a worthwhile series. Well recommended.
32 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Different From the Two Other Series
retiredhpd7 April 2024
This series takes the viewer from the B-17's flying from the US to Greenland and then on to England. BoB started with the training of Easy Co in GA. Pacific was similar to BoB. I felt like we missed out on knowing the characters here because they were just dumped on us and two of them were majors. I felt like I missed a couple of episodes and couldn't get caught up. I never got past the knowledge of the three or four main characters. The others all seemed alike and I couldn't differentiate them. The Tuskegee Airman seemed like an afterthought, but I'm glad they included them even though they weren't in the Eighth AF. Some people complain about CGI. I thought it was remarkable and I can't think of any other way it could have been done. Some reviewers have a problem with how the Brits were portrayed. I thought they were shown to be brave and resilient. Still, movies like this are a national treasure. The Eighth AF represents all our heroes who fought in the skies over Germany and Japan. The movie made sure the viewers knew Germany was pure evil in its intentions to conquer and subjugate the world. I would give BoB a 10, Pacific a 9, and this a solid 8.
37 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Entertaining
Supermanfan-138 April 2024
Masters of the Air is every bit as good as I hoped it would be. There are a ton of war movies and series to choose from so for you to watch one it would have to be pretty special and stick out from the rest. Well, Masters of the Air definitely does that. It's worth every second watching this. This is a star studded cast both in front and behind the camera. It's produced by Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks, the same two who made the perfect Band of Brothers. Th e cast is also amazing. It stars a pair is Oscar nominees from last year in Austin Butler and Barry Keoghan, it also stars a handful of up and coming stars in Callum Turner, Anthony Boyle, Nate Mann, etc. The story takes place during World War II. It's about the airmen who risk their lives and the brotherhood of the 100th Bomb Group. This has the feel and look of a big blockbuster summer movie. You can tell Apple put in a lot of money into this and it's beautiful. Be prepared to go through every single emotion because this series takes you on a ride. Once you start you won't want to stop watching.
48 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Amazing! Def worth the watch.
bdale-5665019 April 2024
Amazing movie, acting, direction, sequences, story, set designs etc. Yes its been done before many times but not like this. The ending was the best part great tribute to these brave men who protected our freedoms. If you're born in the united states or not I think most will enjoy and maybe even learn something. Hoped they had more of the Tuskegee airmen but the were represented. CG was also very well done along with the real planes and battle scenes. Its definitely worth watching.

They could've also had a bit more of a backstory on the lead characters, but that would make for a good season two or a movie in the future. - D.
32 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Why disrespect the RAF?
jlftagchair29 January 2024
The RAF lost 55000 out of 125000 aircrew on bombing missions. In June 1942 it launched 1000 bomber raids on Nazi Germany and became the technology leader in air warfare with tech that far surpassed the Norton bombsight. It was not crewed by arisyo toffs. It was a young force (1918) crewed mainly by middle class and working class Brits plus thousands of Australians, Canadians, New Zealanders, Poles, South Africans and others.

Do, why does Masters of the Air go out of its way to disrespect Britain and the RAF? The story of the 100th Bomb Group and the 8th Air Force is s monumental story that does not need to denigrate it's allies to score some cheap shot. The bombing campaign was a team effort and all the young men involved should be treated with the respect they deserve.
402 out of 505 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Survivors of the Air
GianfrancoSpada12 April 2024
This is undoubtedly a colossal production about an aspect of WWII that has already been extensively covered in cinema, and now it is revived with all the current cinematic power and the resources that the Spielberg-Hanks duo are capable of deploying. Much of the criticism often compares this series with the legendary "Band of Brothers," also produced by the same duo, but I believe that it is a mistake because, despite the common historical moment, they are two completely different worlds, each with its own peculiarities and narrative needs.

"Band of Brothers" is undoubtedly the most grandiose and well-structured war epic about a group of men united by a common destiny, a group of soldiers who have been together from their training days until the final days of the war. There, the spirit of camaraderie becomes very strong, and the bonds very tight. This has allowed for a narrative depth in these characters that has no parallel in cinema on this subject, and the very title of the series already gives a clue and is also entirely explanatory.

In "Masters of the Air," the title also gives us a clue. It is not about a brotherhood of comrades; it is about masters, dominators of the sky, masters for having survived when many other comrades have not returned home. They are masters of survival, not of camaraderie. In the Eighth American Army, camaraderie was very difficult to establish when half or more of the crews did not return from missions, and new replacements were coming in day after day. In this context of infrequent interaction, it is difficult to find elements to delve into camaraderie and the psychological portrayal of the characters. Furthermore, it must be said that aviators are made of a different cloth; they are not simple soldiers; they are the elite of the armies, a sort of gentlemen who have rarely set foot in the mud of the trenches and have seen firsthand the deaths that their bombs have caused, except for the losses of their own crews.

Therefore, I believe it would be better to compare this series with another historical one, much more complete in terms of the number of episodes and seasons produced, such as "Twelve O'Clock High." Despite the many differences, if we want, we can see "Masters of the Air" as a summary, in color and with all kinds of special effects, of something that has already been extensively covered in historical series. Indeed, almost all the events narrated are already present there.

Certainly, comparisons are odious; both productions have decades of differences between them, but both undoubtedly complete a chapter of the war history that leaves little room for cinematography.

What else can I add? "Masters of the Air" is impressive in its visual power, with very well-executed reconstructions, both physically and materially, as well as in terms of CGI. The music is also very apt, and the dialogues, always very believable and well-structured, allow the excellent cast to superbly portray those young heroes who, in their innocence, faced the most feared enemy forces in the skies.
37 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Masters of the Air
FKDZ16 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Masters of the Air, I don't see it, I don't feel it. I'm heavily biased towards these types of shows, I'll rewatch The Pacific or BoB any day of the week. Because when I jump into those shows they remind what it feels to care for your characters. This is something MotA fails miserably at due to it's poor and diluted writing.

I've been really looking forward to this show for a while now, and have eagerly watched every episode from the first week. But what began as excitement transformed into annoyance and frustration more and more as I began less and less engaged in the show. I find it's directing, it's writing and general direction really misguided and poorly executed. Whilst sure the show looks the part visually (albeit somewhat overly stylized) it fails to engage me in any sort of way. And that's certainly also not due to the acting because it was good, great even with some.

That characters in this type of show die out of the blue is to be expected. But when a character dies and I think ''that's it, really?'' whilst we've had about 3 seconds of dialog and development of that character and the his final scene was made to look like we should really care.. I just scoffed at the intention to expect us to care. The only character that had me somewhat care about him was Crosby. But everyone else felt ''fake'' to a degree, written as caricatures just to spill out some predictable lines.

Then we have the storylines.. oh boy. What happened, what's with the fighter pilot sideplot that has some of the worst focus every, it felt like it was just rammed in there and then... uhh, nothing. Same with the whole Crosby love plot, where did that go? All these small plots felt just so barebones in execution. The bare minimum was met, and that's that. Unsatisfying as a whole.

If anything I rate it the way I do because I enjoy the aspect this show highlights, the flying. It's a perspective we've not had enough time with and was my main draw to keep watching.

The music is decent. The intro is uniquely long and imo, filled with spoilers for the show, why did they think it was smart to show so many crucial scenes in the intro? Sound design is great. VFX is great most of the times, here and there some shots look a bit iffy especially the planes.

Besides all this, this show feels sanitized. With just a few small moments where you as a audience need to gasp because they need you too. It all feels to clean, too directed. The city scenes feel like big Hollywood sets, nothing feel raw and depressing enough to emit the ambience of war.

Just writing, everything, dialog, story.. the biggest downfall of this show.
56 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It was good, but nothing new
londontherock5 April 2024
Let me start off by saying I really enjoyed the series, it was really quite good. The acting is good, the sets and costumes and characters are phenomenal. I feel like they really show you the horrors of war. Certainly some of the best depiction of aerial Combat I've seen (I can't test to its accuracy but it certainly kept me at the edge of my seat). But it should have been better and ultimately it's nothing I haven't seen before in other World War II films and series. That being said this is top caliber.

The main con being that so many characters come in and come out of the series that it's hard to get attached to many of the newer ones, even though large parts of the stories are built around them. I understand that they were trying to be somewhat historically accurate and that's why they kept bringing a new characters, but it just got hard to tell who was who and even when I couldn't remember peoples names, I didn't feel too much for them because I only know them for a few episodes. Also, this is really nitpicky, but the opening tile sequence is a little much. I always say Apple TV has some of the coolest tile sequences for their shows, this one was boring and cliché, and it really shows just how highly the show thought of itself.

All in all, if someone told me then you very about World War II and wanted to watch a good movie/series about it I would recommend this one. However, if you're a war film buff, it's nothing you haven't already seen.
31 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Incredible Cinematography Great Storylines A great watch.
chieft-122095 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Warning: SPOILERS. Anything produced by Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg is bound to be epic. The story of the 100th Bomber Group stationed in England during World War Two. Well cast with the exception of Austin Butler. Somehow, I got the feeling we were watching Elvis fly a B-17 into France and Germany on bombing runs. He constantly had that upper lip quiver as he barked commands to the crew. Callum Turner and Anthony Boyle were spot on. Death and destruction were highlighted throughout the series. Impossible bombing raids, flying through constant barrages of enemy flak, and having to dodge Luftwaffe fighters saw the deaths of main characters. On one particular day, the group saw the loss of 9 of the 22 crew that launched giving it the nickname "The Bloody Hundredth." So, strap in, get ready for your favorite characters to die in action, or get captured after bailing from a crippled B-17. You will not regret watching this show. Bring the tissues.
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Band of brothers when you order it from Wish
inspektorr12 February 2024
It's just a pale replica of the greatest WW2 tv show ever to have graced the screens. The characters are two dimensional tropes, utter cliches galore left and right and 6 episodes in I don't care about any of them because I don't know them. I have no idea what makes them tick, no idea about their backgrounds, dreams or desires. Every single character is either distant or highly unlikable.

Sometimes it feels like I'm watching the same episode over again, with certain scenes being framed and filmed exactly the same. They wake up, they walk into a staff room, they watch some maps, fly, bomb, some die, others come home. Rinse and repeat.

There is no sense of progress or where things are in the war and there's very little sense of urgency or importance to what they're doing. Finally, there's nothing to show the effects or results of their raids.

Sorry to say it, but I expected so much more.
231 out of 308 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not Band of Brothers or The Pacific But Still Worth Watching
tarascallais17 February 2024
First off, I see a lot of low ratings coming from, I am guessing, Brits that are upset by the lack of respect given to the RAF in this production. They are not wrong. Basically the only RAF presence is depicted as jerks. Apologies to the Brits. From watching a lot of British TV and movies I know they get annoyed by our arrogant idea that we single-handedly won the war, or basically our arrogance in general. This production is definitely waving the American flag.

If you can put that and the questionable choices of accents used by some of the actors aside, the story is very compelling. I have watched the first 5 episodes that have aired and have found myself literally at the edge of my seat during some of the air combat scenes. My only suggestion is to not get too attached to the characters. If you were a fan of Game of Thrones you know what I mean. It is sometimes hard to keep track of who is who and hard to tell who is talking during air combat scenes because they are wearing masks. If you put on closed captioning, it help.

All in all, I find this entertaining and recommend you give it a try. I look forward to watching it each week. It is slow moving and builds from week to week. Don't give up if you are not instantly drawn in by the first episode. I have read it is also not historically accurate. There is an article somewhere that points out the fact from the fiction. This did not bother me because I wasn't looking for a documentary. I am a bit of a history nerd, however, so I also like knowing the facts the story is based on. Since the characters are based on real people, don't Google them if you don't want spoilers. I made that mistake with one of them. Lesson learned. Didn't Google anyone else after that.

Once again, sorry Brits for the diminished role of the RAF in this production. The RAF deserves more respect than what it got here. I know there are several British actors portraying Americans in the cast (more than actual Americans, I think), but this is definitely an all-American, baseball and apple pie, flag waving production and the focus is on an American squadron's role in World War II. So, if you choose to watch, you will know what to expect.
60 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent Story Line
haglerj3 April 2024
Excellent story line and the actors do a great job of making it real. Definitely worth watching. Only negative is the American accents seem a bit off, which if you have a ear for language could be a bit annoying and does distract at times. However, the show does not disappoint and does a good job of transporting one to WWII. The sets look realistic and the show tries to display the horrors of war tastefully as possible, without going over board. I've read and seen documentaries about the flying fortresses but never have seen it come to life as well as Masters of the Air do. Some of the characters seem over confident and not sure if that is real or not, but hey its Hollywood!
23 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
[8.6] Check!
cjonesas2 April 2024
An outstanding achievement !

As much as I resisted in the first episodes, I was subdued by the sheer force of the series, its unbelievable realism, setting, scenes & situations, native talking in foreign languages and the acting by all the cast and most importantly by the supporting cast and extras.

One of the most impactful series on WWII after 'Band of Brothers' and 'The Pacific' and I'm not joking.

Awesome achievement by Apple TV and big big dedication put into its production.

  • Screenplay/storyline/plots: 8.5
  • Production value/impact: 9
  • Development: 9
  • Realism: 9
  • Entertainment: 9
  • Acting: 8.5
  • Filming/photography/cinematography: 9
  • VFX: 9.5
  • Music/score/sound: 8.5
  • Depth: 9
  • Logic: 6.5
  • Flow: 8.5
  • Action/drama/thriller: 7.5
  • Ending: 8.5.
22 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Peaks too early, no ME262 jet encounter, missed opportunities
mugwamp-98320 April 2024
I was sold on this up until the 6th episode. And then it was like the enemy just quit. But we have 4 more episodes left to do? And that is where the missed opportunities are.

Once D-Day hits, it was like no air opposition now. So lets check off boxes. POW check. Tuskegee Italian air campaign. Check. Unnecessary romantic flings, yawn. German boy soldiers running around with empty rifles, check.

A missed opportunity to ramp up the tension and excitement would be the mighty 100th first encounter with German jet fighters. The post mission debriefing describing how propeller less panes shot down one of their own. Remove the stupid romance episodes and chronologically feature the Enemy as very much still a threat.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Watch for yourself
sheltonemma16 March 2024
I am rather disappointed by so many negative reviews given so early on, stick with it. No way did it deserve these low scores. After watching all the episodes and the finale today (only just released), I felt this had been a programme I looked forward to seeing each week i really enjoyed it. Obviously Band of Brothers and The Pacific were amazing, and this is different, but its an important telling of these events and belongs in the same canon.

It took a while to get warmed to the characters, but you do over time, remember they're playing real people and their stories are engaging, touching, sad and what they went through, shocking at times and it takes you on their journey where sometimes you need to hold your breath.

The production was fantastic, the sound, visuals, costumes and it's a great mini series which enlightened me into just how tough they had it, what they did for us and how they got through it. I'd happily watch again and it's not bad by any means.
26 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good action but poor character development
AmyJenson199529 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
After watching the first two episodes of this much expected show called Master of The Air, I have to admit it's not what I was thought this show would be and I'm a little disappointed.

There are some issues with this show that needs immediate correction. Some issues you should not expect from people of the caliber of Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg who are well known for their sense of accuracy and character development.

About the latter, it lacks a mile if not two. Besides the names of the characters, we don't have much to go on. We don't see them during their training and their relationship. We don't know their personal stories. We are thrown straight to their missions and that was miscalculated. In Band of Brothers and the Pacific (because as it's the third installment of this epic saga we cannot stop ourselves from comparing the three), we know about the before, during and after the war life of the main characters. It makes them interesting and much easier to identify ourselves to them if we were facing the same situation they were facing. The fact that both Band Of Brothers and The Pacific benefited from the testimonies of the people who were there helped a lot.

This brings me to the second point which is the facts accuracy which sometimes defies logic. For example, those pilots are way too young to be majors as they all look like they come straight from high school. I literally blinked when Austin Butler who is a major in the show tells his buddy like a rookie how he never expected the war to be like that! Come on you're a MAJOR! You should have more experience than the rest of your crew and at least you should have seen some combat before 1943 which is 2 years after the war began for the US!

Then we have this lieutenant who is suffering from air sickness. Do you sincerely believe that someone who can't stand flying will be set as a NAVIGATOR which was a crucial role in a bomber crew as he's the one telling the pilots where to go?? In any Air Force, that guy would have been reversed to the infantry or maybe the administrative staff of his branch but God not assigned to a crew who was always supposed to fly at high altitude to avoid the enemy flak! I know we started this war with almost nothing but this is way over exaggerated in that show.

Also I don't understand why the British are seen in this show as arrogant and incompetent. I mean they fought with us from the beginning to the end and they were the only people who stood against Hitler from the very beginning of this war. I think they deserve a much better treatment than we've seen in Masters Of the Air. In my opinion it should be us who would be the underdogs at that period of time who should learn from the experienced brits who have successfully fought the Germans since 1939.

But let's be honest, Master of The Air has some assets in its sleeves starting with the great action and suspense. The flying scenes are breathtaking especially the short intense moments where the crews are facing the deadly German fighters. And there are also some realism as you can see the heroes are not invincible and they also can die. The music is great and epic like the first two installments and it fits the script. I have hope it will get better but it needs to show its potential right now in the third or it's gonna be an epic bust.
127 out of 186 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
James Dean fly's a plane
harrijeff27 January 2024
The acting was absolutely horrible. I should have had a glimmer of what was to come in the opening of the first episode were one of the pilots chews on a toothpick and has highlights in his none military haircut, why not just put a Lucky Strike behind everyone's ear? This is no Band of Brothers and the director and producer should have to pay money back to the executive producers, but they signed off on it. Photography and action scenes are well done, so I can see why some give the show high marks but in a world that prefers watching cartoons to good quality shows it doesn't surprise me that some think this show is watchable. I think people are afraid to rate this as it should be because you have power houses like Spielberg and Hanks behind it. Tell it like it is, its a dog. Woof.
92 out of 151 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Band of Brothers... in the sky?
m1_pierogi5 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Overall, this series is good. Certainly not the best the Spielberg/Hanks duo have made, but in general it is good. You can easily watch it and enjoy it - be shocked and horrified at the terrible brutality of war, but from a new angle (although occasionally the familiar one of the ground).

Sadly, scrutinising it quickly reveals some problems. Apart from Buck, Bucky, Crosby, and Rosenthal I didn't really find myself able to care much for any of the other characters. Their arcs simply weren't fleshed out enough, even if they died early on. Two come to mind: the other navigator Crosby was friends with and the pilot Buck was friends with, but I cannot remember their names. Is that the nature of war at play or poor character development?

There are also several subplots that are left loose, which isn't something that should be happening in a big budget series (writers' strike must have hit hard). Crosby's relationship with the... Subaltern (can't remember her name either!) which ends because she is part of SOE and is sent to France to help the resistance. We know this because we are shown a scene where she is in France helping the resistance, but then nothing else. It is the same on Crosby's side. Every time Rosenthal brought up his wife, Crosby would attribute his lack joy of seeing her to how the war has affected him, but apparently his affair hasn't. Another concerns the Tuskegee airmen, who seem inserted into the series to hit the diversity quota, because their subplot is left hanging as well. Sure they get rescued with all the other POWs, but then we don't hear from them until we are told about what happened to them after the war. The series could have benefitted from expanding on their story, but it wouldn't have really suffered from a lack of it, allowing more screentime to characters we already know a bit.

There is also the problem of how the British airmen are portrayed, but other reviews have already pointed this out. However, I would also like to point out that the Poles could have been better portrayed too. Despite being some of the best pilots, all we get is one person from the government in exile who is a bit sad (at least that's the impression I got) her pilot husband died. As you might have gathered, this series was made with an American audience heavily in mind.

Finally, the end. Comparing this to Band of Brothers is like trying to compare the achievements of a great king's heir to the king. And this is most evident in the end. The end of Band of Brothers felt much more cathartic and you were able to revel in it. In Masters of the Air, it seems over too quickly. War's over, let's show some partying because the people are happy, and then it ends. We don't get a view from the Eagle's Nest onto the beautiful hillsides of the Alps, it just ends.

Now before you think I have tried to pick every bone I could with this series, let me assure you that I enjoyed it, and you will probably enjoy it too. The crew simply dropped the ball on a fair few occasions which slightly worsens the viewing experience. However, there is some excellent acting and visuals, and it generally feels authentic. They also managed to prevent the bombing missions from feeling repetitive, which was something I feared would happen. Much like I said at the start, good, but certainly could be improved.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
2 episodes of absolute nonsense
doorsscorpywag30 January 2024
I'm English and had an uncle I never met who died piloting a Mosquito in WW2.

His sister, my mum, was a radar operator during the Battle Of Britain. They were born into a working class family whose father was a miner in the Northumberland coalfields.

The vast majority of the RAF during 1939-1945 were ordinary Middle or Working Class men & women not Lords & Ladies all related to the Royal Family..

So It was offensive to see the RAF portrayed as cowardly toffs who dropped their bombs on helpless civilians whilst the noble USAAF destroyed their targets in a wave of accurate bombing as shown in E2 where they destroyed the Kiel U Boat pens.

The reality was that in over 2000 sorties against U Boat pens in France & Germany the USAAF inflicted next to no damage for the loss of 119 bombers and 1190 men.

Also the famed Norden bombsight was not much different to RAF raids generally scoring about 30% within 300 yards of the target and the other 70 percent blew the crap out of the surrounding area which included German/French civilians.

We adopted area bombing because even with our newest bombsights we could not accurately destroy a target.

This seemed to be frowned upon by our new USAAF friends in Ep2 but shortly after General LeMay did exactly the same thing to Japan.

Of course every American was good looking and a wow with the ladies whilst our lads bumbling idiots.

Why this sort of nonsense was thought of as good TV I don't know.

In reality Brits & Yanks got on well enough with each other although some of our boys (they were mostly kids) resented these 'Johnny Come Lately's after 3 years of fighting Hitler's best in the air. WE destroyed the German's best pilots in the Battle Of Britain and and lets not forget our brave Commonwealth friends who had fought and died with us well before the Americans turned up. AND yes it included some very brave Americans who came here when the war began and joined the RAF some even fighting in the BOB.

So we weren't just a bunch of toffee nosed cowards as we had already experimented with Daylight Raids and been slaughtered so with the tech we had decided Night Bombing helped save our brave bomber crews.

So that scene where US & British pilots had a stupid fist fight after a discussion on Daylight v Night time pretty much summed up this pitiful drama.

We lost 56000 of our bomber crews and 1000s of our ground crews.

This not counting fighter pilots who died.

And so did many a brave lad from the States who lived some place nobody had ever heard of which now has a plaque somewhere commemorating his sacrifice.

So setting the US against the British is shallow and nasty.

The rest isn't up to much either. Cardboard cut out characters nobody remembers once the credits roll. Poor CGI rendered bombing raids. Lazy writing using cliché after cliché.

This maybe tried to be Band of Brothers but it is not BOB. Even as an Englishman, who had many relatives who fought in WW1 & WW2, that series is probably the best WW2 TV drama ever. The real men portrayed in the series were brought to life brilliantly and watching you shared the loss when they lost friends killed or maimed.

This lot ....nothing.
885 out of 1,254 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Big up the yanks, belittle the brits.
mellison-783792 March 2024
I was quite excited by this new series with Spielberg and co at the helm. But after a few episodes the script took a turn for the worse, why belittle the RAF making out they are some toff graduates from Oxford or Cambridge, quite embarrassing really. Of course the Americans are the only heros in this, utter BS. Spielberg is a f?@king numpty. There were many brave men from all sides but as always the yanks saved the day single handedly where the RAF were buffoons. We all know the British have the best armed services in the world and between me and you the yanks are somewhat jealous, so they try and make themselves look better. Spielberg yawn off.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Generally Quite Good
unkommon18 March 2024
After the first couple episodes I was pretty hesitant to continue with the series. It felt like a poorly hashed out, over dramatized Band of Brothers, which is one of the best shows of all time. So, the bar was high, sure, but not so that you couldn't tell a similar, respectable story about the American airmen of WWII, but it didn't really feel too much like that, not until the final half of the show. The pacing of the entire series does feel a bit odd, however, as the Americans were only in the war for a few years (and, yes, much to the point of a lot of these reviews, slandered the Brits who were fighting much longer, in an unnecessary exchange that was meant to develop characters which felt like getting soggy wet bread thrown in your face) so, we jump through time quite a bit (around 3 years in 9 episodes) with little indication that time has progressed by months at a time, until we end up in late 1944/early 1945 in the final episode, at which point the timeline becomes less convoluted but also less consistent with the rest of the show's pacing. Which is important, and which its predecessor succeeded at marvelously, because this is a historical drama with real events and real people that can't be conflated with nonsensical fictional musings else it completely removes the media from any sincerity it might have had. Which was the case in some of the earlier episodes, but as the story progressed and the notion that quite a few of these characters that are being played up as important suddenly vanish for perhaps good, lends itself to the reality of war. Which is where war films are at their inherent best, because war is bad and playing it up as some sort of glamorous and heroic endeavor is abjectly antithetical to the reality these types of shows and movies aim to capture. This is simple stuff, so it shouldn't even be mentioned, especially over 20 years after Band of Brothers and over 50 years (90 since the original original) after All Quiet on the Western Front demonstrated what it means to tell these stories honestly. Ultimately, I feel this show did accomplish that feat, but it wasn't until the latter half that it really honed in on the realism and avoided the tedious, fabricated melodrama that riddle Apple TV shows. I feel like this series is worth the watch, it definitely takes its time getting there, but it succeeds, and succeeds well when it does. 7.5/10.
28 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Remember what you're comparing it to
SuperMassiveWill18 March 2024
99% reviews, understandably, are comparing 'Masters of the Air' to 'Band of Brothers'. Remember in doing that comparison though you're talking about arguably the greatest TV series ever made. Yes, MOTA isn't as good but then nothing is. It is still absolutely sublime in moments and intriguing at the least in all others. The personal stories and the kinmanship of BOB and 'The Pacific' are still there but in taking away the ground combat the action isn't quite as intense.

The early few episodes tackle what you're expecting to see but as the series develops storylines diverge and some unexpected turns mean the series is not all based around air combat. I'll let you decide if that's a good thing or not.
21 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not Band of Brothers - But I liked it more than Pacific
xharkhan17 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I have no family I know of, that fought in WW2, one set of grandparents lived through the blitz in London, the other set were in Portsmouth (my grandad was a fireman).

First I want to mention Blake Neely. The soundtrack is fantastic, I'm a big french horn fanboi, ever since Star Trek First Contact! Just the right level of goosebumps vs sniffles (in later episodes), certainly making it into my "movie soundtracks" playlist.

I liked the progression of the series, the big events like the Battle of Brittain were done with the standard US made twist, I dont hate it but can recognise the stench of U571...I can appreciate why they laboured the point of RAF strikes being night raids, because of the level of attrition already suffered after 4 years of war in europe, I think it tried to tell us that the pilots were grizzled, they hated the German pilots, pationately...the accents were a bit much, but again, it wasnt quite as bad as "James William Bottomtooth III", but its pretty bad.

Through the early episodes the losses really mounted quickly, I think thats why they struggled to develop some characters, but then there are characters like Rosey that are really deep, I love the character and was in bits when they show the actual photos at the end. Bringing in the Tuskegee did feel a touch crammed, I'd spotted the red tails in the intro sequence (or a trailer) so i knew to expect them, but it did feel a bit left field, segway to "meanwhile, in this hitherto unmentioned region"...but I do like Gatwa, so I'm not against it!

Is this as good as Band of Brothers, no its not...for a number of reasons. Is it a great series that is well worth a watch, 100% yes, I've enjoyed it hugely...Its not going to be for everyone, but I liked it a lot.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed