This show seemed interesting, expecting it to delve into the facts around deaths of famous people and eliminate the rumors. This show is based largely in rumors and speculation but in the end agree with the official report. The one commentator has a bachelors in IT but considers herself an internet sleuth. She does not have a degree in criminal investigations or even investigative journalism or any training in medicine she only knows what she can find on the internet. Which might be why she said that most times cpr is performed if breaks ribs. I originally got my cpr certification 20 years ago and kept renewing it and the fact is you break the sternum but you shouldn't break ribs especially in an adult male. If you do breaks ribs it is usually only a couple not 9. A quick google search resulted in a study in the National Library of Medicine that said only about 26% far from the vast majority the commentator seems to believe it is and calls into question her internet sleuthing ability. There are points where they seem to contradict themselves, like when they say there is no evidence of an injury after saying it was mentioned in the ambulance report by the EMT. It is strange how they seem to pick and choose what they believe, in some cases they believe what appears to be little more than rumors and seem to dismiss legal and/or medical reports. I think in ever episode I saw they agree with the official story and any mystery remains largely or entirely unexplained despite the show being titled (Re)solved as if it adds clarity or facts when it doesn't.