Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Good lesbian movie--an oxymoron?
19 December 2001
Before Wheeler and Thompson set out to make Better than Chocolate, they interviewed several lesbians about what they wanted to see in a film. Disregarding the fact that the number one response was sex toys (?!), this method here points up the major problem with the film--in trying to be the ultimate lesbian film, it doesn't succeed as a narrative film at all.

First of all is the problem of the romance between the two main characters. In a typical romantic comedy, which this tries to be, regardless of the atypical gender roles, you have a series of problems keeping the couple apart. Here this is not the case--like many other lesbian movies, Better than Chocolate suffers from the misconception that when two lesbians meet, they immediately fall in love. Add to this the fact that neither character has any distinguishable personality traits, and you wind up with a serious lack of plot. No tension here, and no reason to particularly care.

The next problem is the rest of the story (sorry, guys). For whatever reason, in promoting a positive image of lesbians, Better than Chocolate feels the need to stereotype each one of its other characters. So you've got the repressed bookstore owner, repressed transsexual, the repressed housewife, and the "omnisexual" bisexual. The one story line that did seem to go somewhere was the friendship between Lila, the mom, and the transsexual character. But, unfortunately, it took second place to the love story, so no luck there.

The final flaw here is in the censorship subplot, which really has no place in the story--it just feels like the writer had a desire to make a (muddled) political statement. Like the rest of the story lines, it appears out of no where and we never get the feeling that anything is at risk. As a result, the final, dramatic blow up at the end, feels tacked on--an attempt to give the film a dramatic quality it was lacking all along.

Over all, Better than Chocolate has been received pretty well. That its rating on this website is much higher than I believe it deserves seems once again a perfect example of the lesbian population's need for a good, representative film. Trust me, I'd like to see one just as much as anyone, but Better than Chocolate hits way below the mark. It's a shame more lesbian films aren't made because if this movie can do so well, it's a clear example that there's a hungry market out there.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Finally!
5 October 2001
Well, after a summer of wading through several lesbian movies of varying quality, I (finally) found what is, at this point, the holy grail of the genre.

Actually, classifying this as a 'lesbian movie' is probably a misnomer. A film like this comes as such a relief after dozens of gay-oriented fair primarily because it is a movie first, and a lesbian movie second. It's a great, sad story (made better by the fact that it's based in truth), with dynamic characters--who actually have chemistry! Amazing.

All-in-all, a very nice movie, certainly worth seeing. I give it 8 out of ten stars over all, but for those looking for something in the lesbian category it's a 10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Oh god--the pacing! the pacing!
27 May 2001
Maybe the story was good. Unfortunately, I can't say for sure since Carpenter's painstaking direction failed to hold my attention for more than a couple of minutes at a time. I know it's unreasonable, etc. to hold a director up against his previous work, but c'mon John, you know better than this--where Halloween was riveting, Prince of Darkness was, well, tedious.

It did have it's good moments. The makeup was effective, and Alice Cooper does creepy as well as you could hope. "Prince" also ranks high on the Eighties kitsch scale--I counted three mullets, and that handlebar moustache speaks for itself.

On the whole, however, I'd recommend this only to those blessed with extreme patience and attention spans. It's not worth the $2.99 at Blockbuster, but if you come across it on FX or something, it might be worth your while to flip between it and "The Jeffersons."
13 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed