Reviews

17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Lost in Space: Contact (2021)
Season 3, Episode 2
3/10
More absurd
15 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I am sorry but this story is getting closer and closer to absurd. Enormous cave hidden in little hill? Two colourful robots supplying instant communication between parts of family separated by distance of a few light years? Really? No delay at all?

Science-fiction means, that even small part of story should be accurate with laws of physics. Please, be serious.
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cats (2019)
8/10
Who wants to sink "Cats"?
5 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Or the first time I met where such a massive action aimed at discrediting the film work. I get the impression that most of the crushing reviews are written by people who have not even seen the trailer but want to join other critics. I consider myself as an musicals, I know Webber's works very good, "Cats" by heart. I have seen musical on DVD and on stage. So I know what I'm writing about. Seeing the trailer did not frighten me - on the contrary, it raised excitement. Tom Hopper's visual experiment (furry actors) convinced me. After the American premiere before Christmas Eve, depressing the film to the lower fifty on IMDB I could not believe it. I went to the cinema as soon as possible. I am convinced that the film has been subjected to a planned trolling attack to ridicule it. I have read many critical reviev - I will try to answer for some of them. 1. "Bad CGI". The effects are exactly as they should be. They are not primitive, they do not interfere with the plot. If anyone wants to watch dancing trees and exploding space stations, let them go to the Avengers. 2. "No plot". This could be an objection rather to Webber than to Hopper. The musical itself is rather a collection of loosely connected songs and dance arrangements (because it's just a set of Elliot's poems). Hopper does a lot to baste this string in a syntactic scenario, adding dialogues here and there, changing the order of the songs. He frames the plan smoothly, jumping from the street to the bar, to the station, barge, to the apartment, the railway bridge over the River Thames. 2. "Judi Dench with a mustache is wagging her tail". How should the old cat look according to you? Female cats, unlike humans, also have a mustaches. Body-independent movements of the cat's tail are also a part of cats behavior. The conventionality of the cat-people's characters did not blatantly somehow anyone in the theater but suddenly began to irritate everyone in movie. I don't think Hopper's "Cats" is an outstanding film, but a very good adaptation. He likes to go against the tide. He proved this in Les Misérables, where he generated a naturalistic world much closer to the original Hugo's work than to the Claude-Michel Schönberg's musical. London in his vision of "Cats" is a bit surreal, shown from a cat's perspective, one will not see there humans. What's good in the movie:
  • camera movement adapting dynamics to the cat's eye
  • color tone
  • lots of hidden gems (I advise you to have a good look at the place names, content of ads on Picadilly Circus in the background)
  • modern choreography, it is no longer the work of the Gillian Lynne) but sparkling (except for Franceska Hayward's classical dance) hip-hop and breakdancing arrangements
  • excellent acting, especially Ian McKellen's autopathy, but also a concert by Lady Judi Dench. James Corden and Rebel Wilson perfectly embedded in their episodes.
The film is not perfect - contrary to expectations Jennifer Hudson didn't convince me (I expected much more from her "Memory"), Hayward plays mainly with beauty and dance but not with skills. However, this is a very good adaptation of the musical and I look forward to Blu-Ray (which I am afraid will be on the market soon). In conclusion, I will answer one more objection I encountered - "what is the target group of this film". Simple - fans of musicals, fans of good music. Unfortunately a group to small compared to young recipients, who are moved by a tree repeating one English-Dutch phrase over and over and over again talking with a raccoon. Therefore, the film will have an undeserved flop. Who is involved? I do not know.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Banacek (1972–1974)
7/10
Not polish proverbs
5 May 2011
"Banacek" has also been aired in polish TV during seventies. Polish people were partly proud, partly disappointed watching these series. People were laughing watching it and started to make jokes about this TV series. Main reason of jokes were "typical polish" proverbs often cited by investigator.

I can assure you - none of his proverbs really exist in Polish. All of them were invented by script writers. Many years later, when someone tried to "invent old tradition" saying something which sounded archaic but in fact was invented by him people used to say "Do not be such Banaczek".

Btw. proper polish spelling of his name is "Banaczek" and should be pronounced as "Bana-check"
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great Performances: Les Misérables in Concert (1995)
Season 24, Episode 10
10/10
Go and see performance first, later see DVD
9 September 2010
It is my favorite musical and one of my favorite DVD. But I made mistake. I had seen DVD before I saw London performance. The problem is, that this performance is cut comparing to stage score. Not to much, but significantly. I understand of course, that score was to long for TV broadcast. But in my opinion too many important songs were cut. F.eg. solo of Valjean from "Thenardier Waltz of Treachery" and ending of this song (with young Cosette), first meeting of Marius and Cosette (The Robbery), and definitely duet of Marius and Valjean in "The Wedding". Lack of these songs and lack of stage movement causes understanding of full show difficult. So do not watch this movie before watching theatrical performance.

Stop complaining. It is really extraordinary performance. Singers are doing their best - Wilkinson, Quast, Henshall, Galloway, Salonga, Ball and Armstrong are simply breathtaking. Definitely best performances I have ever heard. Chorus consisting of 200 singers singing a cappella is incredible. 17 Valjeans ending show give you unique impression how different tenors might be good performers of this score. This DVD is perfect reminder of stage show. I hope 25th Anniversary performance planned on 3rd October 2010 in O2 Dome will contain stage movements and will be recorded for DVD broadcast too.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Levity (2003)
9/10
Who rated this movie?
26 June 2009
It is definitely one of the best American movies, I saw during last year. I was watching it with eyes wide open. What a masterpiece, I was thinking. Let's check the review on IMDb. Surprisingly, I realized that average vote is only 6,5. Astonishing. Why so underrated? To European, too sad, no special effects, to slow? Sorry, not every movie should look like 'Dark Knight'. Some moves are made for people, who like to think and to feel. Main idea of this movie is inevitable truth. There is no redemption for conscience. One cannot turn back time. One will regret one's sins forever. Perfect Billy Bob Thornton, good Morgan Freeman, touching Holly Hunter. Even Kirsten Dunst (who is not my favorite actress) is reliable.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Enigma (2001)
4/10
Falsification of history
13 January 2009
This movie is huge falsification of history. First of all - Polish mathematicians and cryptologists decrypted Enigma several years before WWII. Decrypting machines were already built. You may read about it here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptanalysis_of_the_Enigma But Polish contribution to the story in this movie is mentioned in this movie in one single phrase. But there is even worse point. The only bad character of the movie is a Pole! Author of this stupid scenario invented Polish guy who would be able to betray allies and become a German spy. What an absurd ! This 'author' probably knows nothing about polish attitude to Nazis during WWII. Poland during WWII had two occupants and two enemies - Nazi Germany and Soviet Union. But no one would join one enemy against the other. It was impossible. But not for makers of this movie. If Pukowski were a real man, after revealing the truth about Katyn, he would probably commit suicide.
15 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scorchers (1991)
9/10
Highly underrated
17 March 2008
I watched today this movie having real pleasure. I have never seen for a long time such mixture of hilarious humor and serious drama. Once you laugh loudly, one minute later you may have tears in your eyes. Main characters are excellent, Fay as 50 years old prostitute is marvelous, James Earl Jones plays the way we did not used to - simple, not too clever bartender. I was very surprised, why this movie is so underrated, 5,5 is much too low score. But I have checked it closer and I understood. This is movie understandable for women, they give very high scores close to 9. But guys mainly do not appreciate this firm. Big mistake. I can feel some atmosphere of "Steel Magnolias" in "Scorchers".
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Communistic propaganda
2 July 2006
I realized that nobody from behind 'iron curtain' decided to comment this movie. So do I. This movie is treated by people from this side of Europe as communistic propaganda of its times. Leading role of Soviet scientists, international crew makes me sick. Characters are flat, artificial, they declare but not talk. Story is based on book ("Astronauts") of famous Polish sci-fi writer and philosopher Stanislaw Lem. But I would like to admit, that:

  • it is early book of Lem


  • author treated this book as 'mistake of childhood' and was never proud of it


  • he did not like this movie,
3 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Avoid this movie.
13 June 2006
My recommendation: this is SECOND movie in my life I left cinema in the middle. Why ? This is not comedy anymore like previous movie "Dzien Swira" - with same director, main character and actor. This is unfortunately taken seriously. Very poor story. Badly played. Stupid dialogs. Builded correlation main character = alcoholic = Christ is flat, boring and too simple. Very poor child acting - typical in polish movies. Director simply spoiled good idea making very bad movie. He tried to tell story about his life - son of main character is played by director's son. But he failed. Woody Allen shows much better his phobias than Koterski. I feel 'appreciated' by 2 of 47 people agreeing with me. It seems Polish movie maniacs will accept even s*#t, but made by their favourite director. Sorry guys, this movie is BAD, despite of previous Koterski's movie. Black is always black, even if other people declare it shines brightly.
7 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
great performances, good TV job
11 March 2006
I dare to think, that my opinion (I am a Pole, coming from Krakow) might be interesting for other watchers of this movie. So here are my remarks.

Polish historical background is shown properly, although movie only marks milestones of Polish history after 2nd World War. Krakow is shown in realistic way, main scenes are shot in REAL historic places f.eg.:

  • Pope 'window' chat on Franciszkanska street


  • Krakow's ghetto 'cleaning' on Pilsudski bridge


  • meeting with Wyszynski in Corpus Christi church's garden


I am under impression of Cary Elwes performance. I always regarded him as a comedy actor. But he shows very good picture of young Wojtyla. On the beginning he is rather 'flat'. But he is getting better getting 'older'. He is in fact very similar to young Wojtyla. Very good job, Cary.

If Cary did good work, Jon Voight have done excellent work. Producers have chosen conclave as the moment of replacing main actor. It is very good idea. Jon Voight perfectly studied mimicry of old Wojtyla, his way of walking (before and after hip operation). He showed us in realistic way growing influence of Parkinson disease. I fully agree he deserves Emmy award. His last public 'dumb' appearance on Vatican window is very touching and memorable picture.

Authors of movie did extremely good research work. Movie quotes several well known memorable pictures of Wojtyla, f. eg:

  • reading a book in canoe - canoe altar mess - making a 'glasses' from hand by Pope - described above last public appearance


Sometimes (especially when light dimes and Voight is taken from profile) main actor became so similar to Wojtyla, that you might have impression to watch documentary.

Unfortunately special effects are bad. Pictures of crowd (f.eg. Warsaw mass, St Peter Square) are artificial, flying doves are artificial, German airplanes over Krakow are also too artificial. Maybe it is not visible in TV, but it looks really bad in theater.

And finally last remark. This movie is now distributed in polish cinemas (Poland is probably the only country in the world which broadcasts this movie in theaters). I do not know exactly what is the difference between versions shown in USA in TV and 'polish' theatrical version. I can see it is much shorter (127 min) Unfortunately it is also dubbed. I could not hear polish accent of Jon Voight. If I could vote for main actors only my score would be 10/10. But whole movie (although very good as a TV movie) is not perfect for reasons described above. It deserves strong 8.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Run Lola Run (1998)
10/10
Inspired by Kieslowski
10 December 2005
People watching "Lola rennt" probably do not know that concept of movie is inspired by Krzysztof Kieslowski movie "Przypadek" (Coincidence) http://uk.imdb.com/title/tt0084549/plotsummary . Tom Tykwer was always a big admirer of a Kieslowski's legacy, he even made a movie based on his writing credits (Heaven). But it is Tykwer's own brilliant anyway. What makes this movie unique and a masterpiece: * perfect and precious story, * modern cinematography sometimes splitting a screen into 3 parallel shots * incredible good music (btw. songs are recorded by actors)

This movie also breaks two of my superstitions: * I hate techno, but I cannot imagine other soundtrack correlated to this movie, * I also hate sound of German language, but I cannot imagine to watch it in any other language version. And, thanks God, this movie is so far from Hollywood standards...
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Touching
10 February 2004
It is unique opportunity to see good American movie. For thinking, not brainless people. I haven't seen for a long time an american movie I wouln't be able to guess the ending. This one really surprised me. I see two parralels to other artists.

My first impression - this film has a lot of Krzysztof Kieslowski spirit. I can see the same sadness of loneliness in Mira Sorvino's eyes as in Irene Jacob eyes in "Double life of Veronique". LULU tells the same story - how lonely we are on this planet.

Second impression - the movie is similar to "The Sixth Sense" in matter of post mortem life. It's hard to guess what is real, and what is imagination.

Great movie for thinking people. Very positive surprise. And Lou Reed as "not Lou Reed" - great joke.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Pianist (2002)
9/10
He have seen it.
16 November 2002
There is something I would like to say to Pianist's admirors. Polanski (director) saw it. With his own eyes... Roman Polanski as a boy was also prisoned in ghetto. Cracow ghetto (the same described in "Schindler's List"). I am sure Roman Polanski have seen all the drastic scenes shot in the movie. I have never seen such realistic scenes of death, street fights and so on. I am afraid that Roman Polanski still have the picture of ghetto in his mind. And by making this movie he is trying to forget...

Btw. I was born in Cracow. 1000 ft from place Roman Polanski used to live...
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Kiss to Die For (1993 TV Movie)
8/10
American best 'femme fatale'
20 February 2002
The movie is not perfect. Typical commercial movie - a kind of horror. But I would advise to watch it because of Mimi Rogers. In my opinion she is the best "femme fatale" actress in Hollywood. She is probably the most attractive victim of american cinematography. Her dying glimpses and heartbreaking despair are really impressive. She played a similar role one year later in "Killer".
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Surprise
16 January 2001
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is one of the most surprising films I have ever seen.

I started once to watch it in Polish TV about midnight. Movie was described in TV guide as horror. In fact I didn't want to watch it but I was not sleepy enough to turn off TV set. Thanks God, I haven't done it.. Beginning - nothing special, rather disgusting... Some guy killed another, later on he tried to kill prostitute just for fun... Soon he is ordered to kill some girl... Seems like C class move, isn't' it?

But the story becomes psychodelic. Killer turns out to be human being. His brainless companion becomes killer. The victim wants to be killed...

I do not want to tell the story. But it is strictly complete. It's hard to see such well-invented story in American movie business nowadays. "Killer" has an atmosphere of "Crying Game" or "House of Games" in one. In fact - the story is a riddle, nothing looks like its seemed on the beginning...

Mimi Rogers as fatal woman is marvellous. Her sad, peaceful eyes stay with you for long time ...
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Bjork gets you off the floor...
11 January 2001
Performance of Bjork gets you off the floor. IMHO she is the only actress who can get Academy Awards this year. Surprisingly - she is not an professional actress. It is not important how possible is the story Lars von Trier tells. Her acting is so real you believe in everything.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Perfect
2 October 2000
It seems that Redford is much better director than actor. Each scene is perfectly planned and picturesque. Kristin Scott-Thomas is marvellous in unhappy love as usual (4 Weddings, English Patient). I love her sad&passion glance.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed