Reviews

12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
On Edge (2001)
Cute Skating Satire
24 August 2004
Judging from some of the comments about this movie, I guess you have to be an ex-skater (or a fan of skating) to appreciate this movie. Yes, it is WAY, WAY over the top, but I think people are missing that it was MEANT to be. I found it a cute and funny film. No, it's not close to one of the greatest mockumentary ever made, but I enjoyed it.

Even though a lot of facts about competitive figure skating are gotten wrong in this movie (deliberately and hilariously so, in some cases) the filmmakers somehow inadvertently got a lot right. While most of these characters are grossly exaggerated for comic affect, I recognize almost all of them. There were quite a few Vedas that I recall: kids who were very good, but didn't give a rat's ass about skating and wouldn't be doing it if their parents (usually but not always their "skating mother") weren't forcing them to. Yes, there were most CERTAINLY mothers as pushy as Veda's mother (some worse, come to think of it and some were even in fur coats) although most of them (thank the Lord) weren't channeling Joan Crawford! Even the friendly and seemingly ever present Zamboni guy (Jason Alexander) is a character I remember. And if you think judges being prejudiced only happens on the international level, well, wake up and smell the coffee!!! There were even a few J.C.'s, girls who couldn't care less about the Olympics, but were working their way towards ice shows. Although you don't have to win Regionals to get into one, you just try out! <g>
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Madigan Men (2000– )
This Show is Actually Funny!
13 October 2000
Hey, surprise! I tuned into this show just because I'm a Gabriel Byrne fan and actually found myself laughing! More than once! And I'm the type of person who usually sits stone faced while watching most sit coms!

Anyone who's ever seen or heard Byrne in interviews won't be surprised how funny & charming he can be, but for those who don't know this side of him, they will find Madigan Men a pleasant surprise!
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Totally Inacurate
27 August 2000
Don't get me started on what an inaccurate representation this movie is of the amateur/ Olympic hopeful ranks of the figure skating world.

But just a few things:

First there are several tests that the D.B. Sweeney character would have to take with the United Figure Skating Association before he could qualify to compete at the National/ Olympic level. You CAN NOT just jump into the Senior level like in the film! (And it usually takes a several years just to schedule and pass these tests!)

Secondly, in real life D.B. Sweeney and Moira Kelly's characters would have had to compete in regionals and sectionals before they could ever qualify to go Nationals! (Even Moira's character could not go b/c she had not competed nationally or internationally and placed in the top three the year before.)

Thirdly, during an amateur competition whether regional, national or international no one EVER skates with the lights off with only a spotlight! (It's WAY too dangerous! Have any of you out there ever seen the lights off during the Olympics?)

And finally, no matter how good a skater D.B. Sweeney's character was, there is NO WAY he could become an Olympic level pairs skater in just 2 years! It usually takes 2 experienced pairs skaters that long to get good together, much less when one of them is trying to learn the sport! MAYBE in 4 years, but that'd still be stretching believability a bit.

Anyway, having been a skater, it is very hard for me to take this movie seriously! (No matter how appealing the two lead actors may be.) I am SO tired of skating movies made without real ice skaters. Believe me, there are TONS of former skaters out there who are now actors who could've done these roles!

If you want to see the only accurate skating movie to date on film, rent Ice Castles! There you see a film that presents the real skating world and is about 90% accurate in doing so. And besides, it's nice to see Lynn Holly Johnson really skate (no double necessary) and after 20 years her skating still looks pretty darn good!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sliding Doors (1998)
One of my favorite films of the 90's
20 August 2000
Warning: Spoilers
I must be in the minority of the people commenting on this film, but I LOVED this film! I really regret that I didn't haul my fanny to the theatre to see this on the big screen. (I wound up seeing it on video.)

Anyway, IMHO this is Gwyneth Paltrow's best performance so far (Yes, including Shakespeare in Love!) She is more subtle and "real" here than in any other film.

I must confess that a reason I like this film so much is that I've always been into the "what if" types of films and have never seen a film delve into the possibilities as much as this film did. And (without giving any spoilers) I really appreciated the reality in which both Helen's lives went; which are not always happy or predictable.

But perhaps this movie is the ultimate 'chick flick'. I can see how men may not 'get' this movie! But for we girls, I can highly recommend this film! (And on a lower note girls, John Hannah is so darling and cute, you'll want to take him home with you!)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
King of Kings (1961)
Not a whimpy Jesus for a change!
6 August 2000
While this film is not as good as the Zeffirelli mini-series, Jesus of Nazareth, it is the only other Biblical film besides that series that I can think of that has a non-wimpy Jesus! (Even in Last Temptation of Christ, the Jesus was so wimpy, one wondered if this guy would ever attract any followers, much less twelve of them!) At least in King of Kings, we see Jesus as what he was, a bit of a radical and not the just the warm, fuzzy, reverential looking guy we are used to seeing in Biblical films.

Also, the extra-Biblical historical stuff is meshed in well with the story (as in Jesus of Nazareth) and does not contradict the Biblical account in any way, but manages to flesh it out a bit without offending 'serious' Christians. (No easy feat!) There's also something slightly dangerous about Jeffrey Hunter that really adds something to his portrayal of Jesus; who after all annoyed all of those in authority around him. If Jesus had been Mr. Warm-Cuddly, would people really have been so anxious to get rid of him? It really ruins our understanding of the story to have a wimpy Jesus, because we just say, "Hey! This guys is so nice and just wants to help people! Why do they want to kill him?" We really have to understand that Jesus seriously ruffled feathers in his time, so if he is portrayed as wimpy, we just miss the point of the whole story, don't we?
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A very touching coming of age story
5 August 2000
Warning: Spoilers
The film begins with a young Alan Marshall describing his hero, East Driscoll who is the local he-man horse breaker. East is a bit of a loner in town and Alan and the other children seem to be his only friends. It is implied that East may keep to himself because he is embarrassed by his "roughness" and lack of education (he cannot read or write).

In the first scene, as Alan describes friend, we see East bathing nude while washing his horses in a river. This scene sets the character of East as a child of nature and something of a Greek God who is worshipped, not only by Alan, but all of the young women in town, whom East barely seems to notice. East is everything the young crippled Alan wants to be; strong, brave and independent. Even though he is crippled, Alan is still determined to be like his hero, East, by never giving up in his quest to learn how to ride.

Alan develops a school-boy crush on Grace McAlister, who along with East, is one of the few people in town who treats Alan just as if he were a "normal" healthy boy. There is a very charming scene where Grace and East are bargaining over the price of hiring East's prized stallion to stud Grace's mare and it becomes apparent that the two are bargaining over more than just horses. It seems inevitable that Alan's two favorite people will get together and become illicit lovers.

Since we are seeing the film through Alan's eyes, we only gradually realize that something is going on between Grace and East. One of the highlights of this film is the sequence where Alan spies on Grace and East as they make love in a barn. This is handled with great tact; the lovemaking is not shown as repulsive and shocking to the young Alan, but as beautiful and natural. In a way, it mirrors Alan's own growing sexual awareness. Grace and East quickly realize they can trust that Alan not to tell anyone about their affair and Alan starts to become part of this strange surrogate family.

One of the subplots is about Alan's father, who in his younger days was a horse breaker like East. In Alan's eyes, his father gave up horse breaking for the less "manly" job of a storekeeper. Part of Alan's fascination with East, is the fact that East represents what Alan's father used to be.

The tragedy begins when East starts to insist that Grace run away with him during the local ball/dance; in spite of the fact that Grace has already told him she will not leave her husband. This is one of the most touching parts of the film, to see this "tough" man completely loose it and fall to pieces over this one woman. He has put all of his hopes and dreams for the future into Grace and is incapable of giving up. (We've also seen in earlier scenes that his determination and refusal to give up is what makes him such a good horse breaker.)

East has been drinking heavily the whole evening of the ball, obviously nervous about what Grace would decide to do. At the ball, Grace still refuses to leave her husband and go with him. East loses control at the dance and creates quiet a scene that is witnessed by the whole town. Tragedy seems to be inevitable as East leaves the dance rejected, hurt, and in a drunken stupor.

This is Russell Crowe at his best; the pain, humiliation and disillusionment on his face, when he realizes his whole world is coming to an end, is completely heartbreaking. Charlotte Rampling also gets one of the rare chances in her career to play a sympathetic, understanding character. The confusion and anguish she shows on her face as she helplessly watches East's manly exterior begin to crumble before her eyes is truly touching.

(Spoiler Warning!)

We know things are not going to turn out well, when Alan sees East ride past his house at full canter and is barely able to stay atop his horse in his drunken state. (This is in stark contrast to the many earlier scenes of East riding past Alan's house as gracefully as a professional jockey.) Therefore, it is no surprise when Alan finds East the next morning, barely clinging to life, hanging from the stirrup of the saddle of the horse. Alan bravely manages to detach East and is dragged for miles by East's horse to get help.

While Alan is in the hospital, he sneaks into East's room and quickly finds out why no one has allowed him to see East. East was dragged about so much by his horse, that he is brain damaged and reduced to nothing more than a vegetable. To see this beautiful young man he admired so much and who was so full of life reduced to this state, is one of the great tragedies of Alan's young life. The contrast between the happy child of nature East was in the beginning of the film and what has become of him is unbearably sad. Ironically, East finally gets what he wanted. Grace takes responsibility for her actions by leaving her husband and taking East to England where she will take care of him.

The film ends with a touching sequence that shows that through this tragedy, Alan has earned the respect of the "grown up" men in the town pub. Before, they would barely notices him and even inadvertently knock the crippled boy over; but now they respect his brave attempt to save East and they respectfully let him pass and even invite him into the pub for a drink! With sensitivity for the weaknesses in us all, this film shows that growing up is an extremely painful process, but a necessary evil we must all go through.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Green Man (1990)
A truly scary, creepy movie
5 August 2000
This is one of those films that is so laid back and realistic that it TRULY scares the crap out of you! The fact that you won't even see the scary bits coming is what sets this movie above and beyond many more obviously scary pictures. And, if you are like me, you will often casually think about some of the scenes in this film, because they are quiet profound! Be prepared to be creeped out by the Green Man!
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I'd Forgotten How Much Fun This Film Is!
15 June 2000
I saw this movie when it came out and thoroughly enjoyed it then and still enjoy it now. (And contrary to what critics may say, the audience I saw it with were also totally into it.) This film is a hoot; it spoofs so cleverly every movie/ western cliche ever perpetrated by Hollywood. But director Raimi goes it one better by filming every shoot-out in endless variations.

I must mention the cast! Sharon Stone, as usual, gives her usual decent performance, but it's Gene Hackman, Russell Crowe & Leonardo DiCaprio who steal the film. First, I should mention I'm not a big Leo fan, but I've always thought this was the role that suited him the best. (Except for his shaky accent, he's perfect as the arrogant kid who just wants to get his father's approval.) Then there's Gene Hackman. Is there any actor who can literally slither into every scene and yet manage to make this monster a real human being? Who else could make you see the insecurities under this "invincible" bad guy? It is also interesting now, to look back at Russell Crowe. This was the first movie I saw him in and I remember thinking, "Who IS this guy? Where the Hell did he come from?" I can usually spot a fake American accent by a Brit or an Aussie, but he fooled me! It's hard to believe that the studio didn't want him for this role. He brings so much intensity to it; you can literally see the struggle not to fight played out on his face!

Anyway, people don't take this film too seriously! It's only meant to be an homage to old movie/ spaghetti westerns. But it's one of the few post-modern/ clever reverential films that manages to work in it's own right. Sam Raimi must be some kind of secret genius!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Margie (1946)
One of the Best High School Movies Ever
15 June 2000
Can a movie made in 1946 still move teenagers today? Well, all I can say is when I first saw this movie in 1983 I was still in high school and this film totally touched and inspired me!

At first, it just seems like your typical nostalgic sentimental high school film. We have, Margie the geeky girl who's so far from being in the 'in' crowd it's pathetic. Then we have the popular girl, Mirabelle, living next door to Margie as a constant reminder of how 'out of it' she is. Then Margie has the typical school girl crush on her gorgeous French teacher and also has the typical pathetic loser/ boyfriend following her around.

But wait! Then Henry King takes a simple movie to a another level and it soon becomes clear we are watching the emergence of a strong and unusual woman. Our first clue that this movie is something different are the sly hints about Margie's emerging sexuality. (I mean, she literally keeps losing her knickers at the most in-opportune occasions, how did this get past the censors?) Then there is Margie's feminist grandmother, who wants Margie to be the first woman president of the United States. But just in case we still don't get it, it all becomes clear when we hear Margie's winning debate speech on why the U.S. should take the Marines out of Nicaragua. (Ironically, when I saw this film in 1983, this issue was as hotly debated as it apparently was in 1929!) Margie, in spite of her awkward gestures and amateur delivery, gives one of the most amazing speeches ever given by a teenager in a film. It is truly amazing. We see unsuspected depths in this young woman and from that point on we (along with the men in her life) are fascinated with how this young ladies life will turn out (to give any more away would spoil the film for you!)

This film also has an unusual look for the time period, since it was one of those rare films in the 40's where exteriors were filmed on location. Henry King is one of the great studio directors who is constantly forgotten and overlooked. But take one look at the skating sequence in this film, where the camera follows skaters beautifully, as they circle around the camera, and you will see a master craftsman in league with Hitchcock or any of the other Hollywood greats. (And as a former ice skater, I can tell you Jeanne Crain is a pretty good skater!)

But the moment that got me most, and still gets me, is the way Margie handles her disappointment about who she has to go to the prom with and the dignity in which she carries herself. This movie shows the amazing and difficult journey of Margie McDuff from a little girl who is on the road to being an amazing woman! (Well, we hope!) So by the end of the film, we believe, along with her grandmother and the others in her life, that Margie is indeed a unique and unusual person and really could have been the first woman president of the United States!
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gladiator (2000)
9/10
An Unique Opportunity for a Great Actor
29 May 2000
This is one of the best movies in recent memory. Not because it is "perfect" film by any means; it definitely has it's flaws. But it is worth the price of admission if only to see superb actors such as Russell Crowe, Jouquin Phoenix, Richard Harris, Oliver Reed, Derick Jacobi, etc. strut their stuff.

While many people who have been Russell Crowe fans for years will resent the fact that many are touting "Gladiator" as Russell Crowe's "breakthrough" role, fans long ago noticed there was something unique about this guy in such film as "Proof", "The Sum of Us", "Quick and the Dead", "L.A. Confidential" and "The Insider".

But in spite of the films flaws, Crowe fans will not be disappointed in "Gladiator" because they get a chance to see him carry the entire weight of a big budget film (he's in practically every scene) on his ample shoulders. As with Vivien Leigh in "Gone With the Wind", it is hard to imagine this film working without the presence of Russell Crowe.

He makes the most believable gladiator I have ever seen on film. I'm sorry, but as much as I loved "Sparticus", I never believed Kirk Douglas could be a real gladiator. He looked more like a gymnist; I never believed he could survive in the Coliseum.

But as good as the other actors in "Gladiator" are, and as good as the effects and fight sequences are, the plot and script could not have been as compelling with any other actor but Russell Crowe playing Maximus.

There is some unique quality about this guy (perhaps the strange mixture of violence and compassion in his face) that brings an absolutely unique contribution to this film. His acting covers the gaps in the script....mostly done with his facial and body expressions since he is rarely given quality lines to say. (Most of the lines in the film are a bit corny or cliched. It's a good thing they had this brilliant cast!)

For example, we are expected to believe that this man, Maximus, who is capable of the most excruciating violence, is at heart a tender hearted family man who simply wants to go home to his farm. It is left up to Mr. Crowe to make us believe this, and he rises to the occasion in spades.

Someone pointed out to me that Crowe does not speak one word of dialogue from the time that Maximus is sent out to be executed by Commodus to the time he is in the gladiator ring shouting, "Are you not entertained?" The fact that, throughout this long sequence (20-30 minutes) I never even noticed Maximus never spoke, is just proof of the unique abilities of Russell Crowe as an actor. This is one guy who could have easily been a silent movie star; something that can't be said for 95% of the actors around today.

As "Gone With the Wind" would have been just a so-so well made movie with nice production values without the presence of Vivien Leigh, so too would "Gladiator" have only been a so-so movie without the presence of Russell Crowe. But because of him, it becomes a symbol of brave people everywhere fighting everywhere against unbelievable odds. Let us hope, as with Vivien Leigh, that the Academy recognizes this unique talent and gives Mr. Crowe his best actor Oscar!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Breaking Up (1997)
An Interesting Look at a Modern Relationship (Some spoilers)
28 May 2000
Warning: Spoilers
I really liked this film! For those who like movies where characterization drives the plot, (in other words, you don't mind a lot of "talking" & lack of action) then you will enjoy this film.

It is also a great chance to see two actors (Russell Crowe and Salma Hayek) strutting their stuff. These two actors have such great chemistry together, you REALLY believe that these two are a couple who can't live with each other but can't live without each other. (I was immediately reminded of Noel Coward's "Private Lives.")

This is basically a two actor piece and a showcase for both actors. It is both funny and heartbreaking to watch these two desperately try to work out their differences and live together happily. Both characters are very realistically drawn and it is nice that neither character is show to be completely at fault for the failure of the relationship. (Both have problems; he's out of touch and fearful of change; she over analyses and is at bit of a pain.)

I found myself identifying with both characters on and off, but mostly (and surprisingly) with the Russell Crowe character. Usually, the men in such films are never given much motivation for their reluctance to "commit." But in this film, we find out why he is fearful, and it is a reason men AND women can relate to! Both sexes can also relate to Salma Hayek's character's frustrations with his pettiness and her reluctance to believe that he sincerely loves her.

For all of those ladies who think Salma Hayek can not act (several friends have made such comments to me); check out this film! This is the best opportunity she has EVER been given in a film. She is really turns in a brilliant and moving performance. After seeing "Breaking Up," I'm looking forward to seeing what opportunities she is given in "Frieda Kahlo."

My only gripe would be the ending! I guess I'm a hopeless romantic, because I hoped they would somehow wind up together at the end of the film! But it does add a realistic if heart breaking touch that is not often seen in "Hollywood" films.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An Audacious and Moving Film
28 May 2000
From the opening moments of "A Matter of Life and Death" when the narrator says, "This is the Universe!! Big, isn't it?" The audience knows they are going to go on a journey in film like no other.

What continues to amaze me, is that after over 55 years, there STILL has never been a film as fearless and audacious as this one. So many risks are taken by Powell and Pressburger; it's a wonder that the film holds together as brilliantly as it does.

If you have never seen a P&P film, this is a good place to start. In "A Matter of Life and Death" they go way out on a limb with subject matter & characterization, dancing dangerously close to "going over the top." But while P&P succeeded in examining the meaning of life, love and our place in the universe as human beings; they still managed to make this film irreverently funny!
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed