Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Death of Yugoslavia (1995–1996)
10/10
A better description couldn't have been made.
27 June 2003
This documentary series (of five episodes) is a painstakingly compiled and researched account of the extended mass-bloodshed which marked the end of the old Federal Yugoslavia and spanned almost the entire first half of the 1990's. It includes a huge wealth of news footage and interviews with involved parties both "Yugoslav" and otherwise. The only real "improvement" which could be made to this amazing achievement would be the inclusion of later developments in the Balkans since the program was made. This was indeed done in the late 1990's for a repeat showing on BBC television, but the addition of some even more recent events would help to complete this admirably detailed and fulsome piece of work. Perhaps another whole episode might be warranted? The very succinct title of this documentary was made all the more appropriate by the eventual abandonment of the term "Yugoslavia" by the now-named Federal Republic of Serbia and Montenegro - a much belated and formal admission of that which occurred years before.

This program is required viewing for anyone who wishes to know about this horrible conflict, it's causes and it's many results.
22 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Corny, dated but nice scenery.
20 September 2002
A truly wholesome creation that I saw while growing up in Australia. A kids show, but of the adventurous variety. A square-jawed, morally fibrous father (where did mum get off to?) and his two sons sail the wide ocean in their yatch, the "Seaspray" of the title, meeting with many a scrape on the way in many an exotic clime. Pretty harmless, really, if a little camp in places. Not exactly gripping, but beats the hell out of most of the pap foisted upon kids nowadays.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Noah's Castle (1979– )
8/10
A dimly remembered drama... at least by me.
14 May 2002
I remember seeing this series sometime in the early or mid eighties when I lived in Australia. It depicted a British society on the brink of anarchy with troops roaming the debris-littered streets and food prices rising to the levels of Weimar era Germany. The family which are the most prominently featured is headed by a stern army colonel type. Although he isn't actually in the military, his reasoning seems pretty close to it. He has planned ahead for the apparently looming breakdown of social order by hoarding serious amounts of food, petrol and other essentials (as well as booze, "for barter", he said!) in the cellar of the fairly isolated family home (the "Noah's Castle" of the title). He decides that the best way to safeguard this hoard is to have a heavily fortified front door, a British army issue revolver and to strongly encourage the rest of the family not to tell anyone about what they have hidden. That aside, There's not a lot else I remember to spoil the ending with (it was over 15 years ago that I saw it, after all).

Sample of dialogue:

Father:(speaking to daughter) How much was that tin of beans?

Daughter:(eating beans out of the tin) £2.

Father: And tomorrow, it'll be 3. D'you know where this county's headed?...Anarchy.

What I remember best about this show is undoubtedly the opening titles which feature a scruffy, denim clad youth fleeing down a rock-strewn street (running away from the camera) closely followed by a couple of British soldiers in fatigues. They become visible one-at-a-time as they run from behind the camera in slow(ish) motion, eerily in time with the moodily grim synthesiser music. Very of-it's-time, but very memorable (unlike the series itself).
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A (1998)
9/10
A compelling but sometimes discomforting documentary.
1 April 2002
"A" refers to the name of the cult or religious group which is the subject of this film. It follows the day-to-day activities of members of the Augm Shinrikyo sect and in particular the group's "press officer", a somewhat awkward but totally sincere young man. Augm (as they were commonly referred to) was found to be responsible for attacks on commuters using the Tokyo subway system. Sarin, a biological agent, was used and the events were widely covered by the world media. Japan as a society was greatly shocked by the event and the Augm members were portrayed as mindless automata, blindly obeying the charismatic leader of the cult's destructive wishes.

As the film proper gets underway (after a quick-fire barrage of images which attempts to communicate the sensationalistic coverage of the attacks and the ensuing disbelief and outrage in Japan), we are confronted by the very gritty reality of the actual cult members. The fact that they've agreed to be followed and filmed in the (literally) months covered by the film seems utterly remarkable considering their very apparent and wide-ranging suspicion of the media and the outside world generally. We meet several of the cult members and witness a few of the quite daunting aspects of their communal existence. Although it is entirely possible that they were at least aware of the plans to use sarin, it seems highly unlikely from what we learn of them and their attitude to the taking of life. Their devotion to the group is seemingly undimmed by the attacks and subsequent jailing of their leader, Asahara, although they later decide to publicly "demote" him from his former divine status amongst the Augm faithful when that becomes unsupportable.

Despite the obvious abnormalities of the lives depicted, it becomes very clear that these are relatively ordinary people who have been thrust into an utterly extraordinary situation. They are publicly scrutinised, demonised and accused by the acutely conservative society in which they live and adopt a siege mentality as a result. Although it's certainly true that their group used classic brainwashing techniques on their members (sleep and food deprivation, psychedelic drugs etc...), it also becomes clear that much of the murderous intent in Augm's activities springs directly from the incarcerated Asahara. As with other cults in recent decades, the leader's wishes and desires became megalomaniacal. Sex with Asahara became more and more of a requisite for female members to achieve a state of grace and apocalyptic events became objectives to be achieved rather than pre-ordained inevitabilities.

Essentially, the cult is reeling in the aftermath (and the vacuum) created by the loss of Asahara rather than the sarin attacks. They had already dropped out of Japanese society and probably viewed the attacks as something happening in another country. For the individuals within Augm, dogged and resolute as they were despite the end of life as they knew it, this film is a document of their decline as a community and how they - and their young press officer in particular - adapt to this. In that way, they are victims themselves - in as far as someone who voluntarily puts themselves in a situation which subsequently goes wrong is - but not nearly as much as the unwitting victims of the barbaric sarin attacks. In the end, the film shows that you simply have to recognize the humanity of those depicted which many Japanese simply do not. This gives away practically none of the real "narrative" (if there is one) and tells nothing of the many tragicomic scenes in the film which make it as compelling as it is. Please see it if you can.
19 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed