Change Your Image
becausejamie
Reviews
Alaskan Costal Sasquatch: Area A (2022)
A Promising Premise Marred by Technical Shortcomings
As an avid film enthusiast, I approached "Alaskan Coastal Sasquatch: Area A" with intrigue and anticipation. The subject matter, revolving around the elusive and enigmatic Sasquatch, held the potential for an engaging and thought-provoking cinematic experience. However, despite the captivating premise, the film's production value, particularly in the realm of videography, fell disappointingly short, hindering its overall impact and credibility.
The Allure of the Sasquatch
Let's begin by acknowledging the inherent appeal of the Sasquatch phenomenon. The idea of a towering, ape-like creature roaming the remote wilderness has captured the imagination of countless individuals worldwide. The filmmakers deserve credit for tapping into this enduring fascination and attempting to shed light on the enigmatic creature's purported existence in the Alaskan coastal region.
The Paramount Importance of Videography
When delving into controversial or enigmatic subjects, the quality of videography becomes paramount. Clear, crisp, and well-framed footage is essential in establishing credibility and allowing viewers to scrutinize the presented evidence objectively. Unfortunately, "Alaskan Coastal Sasquatch: Area A" falls short in this aspect.
The videography in the film is plagued by shaky camerawork, poor framing, and inconsistent lighting, making it challenging to immerse oneself fully in the narrative. Crucial moments that should have been captured with precision and clarity are marred by blurry footage and jarring camera movements, leaving viewers needing help to discern the details.
A Missed Opportunity for Credibility
In a genre where evidence and documentation are paramount, the film's technical shortcomings in videography need to be revised to maintain the validity of the presented material. Viewers may question the footage's authenticity, ultimately diminishing the impact of the film's central premise. When dealing with controversial topics, high-quality videography is not merely a matter of aesthetics; it is a crucial factor in establishing credibility and allowing audiences to evaluate the evidence objectively.
Despite its flaws, "Alaskan Coastal Sasquatch: Area A" serves as a reminder of the importance of production value, particularly in the realm of videography, when tackling controversial or enigmatic subjects. The filmmakers' passion for the subject matter is evident, but the technical limitations of their work hinder their efforts.
As a film buff, I implore the creators to invest in improving their craft, honing their skills in videography, and embracing the latest technologies and techniques to capture footage of the highest quality. By addressing these shortcomings, future projects exploring the Sasquatch phenomenon or other controversial topics could achieve professionalism and credibility that resonate with audiences and contribute to the ongoing discourse surrounding these enigmatic subjects.
The Shape of Shadows (2023)
A Promising Premise Marred by Technical Shortcomings
I approached "The Shape of Shadows" with an open mind, intrigued by its paranormal subject matter. The premise of exploring the enigmatic realm of shadows and their potential connection to the supernatural held promise, offering an opportunity for a captivating and thought-provoking cinematic experience. However, despite the intriguing concept, the film's execution fell short due to significant technical flaws undermining its overall impact.
Subpar Sound Capture
One of the most glaring issues that plagued "The Shape of Shadows" was its poor sound capture. Dialogue often sounded muffled and distorted, making it challenging to fully comprehend the conversations and nuances of the characters' interactions. This issue could have been more problematic during crucial expository scenes, where the audience should have been immersed in the unfolding narrative. Instead, the subpar audio quality was a constant distraction, pulling viewers out of the experience and hampering their ability to engage with the story fully.
Amateurish Videography
The film's videography also left much to be desired. The camera work was often shaky and poorly framed, resulting in shots that felt amateurish and lacking in artistic vision. This lack of technical proficiency was particularly evident during the more intense paranormal sequences, where the camera's inability to capture the action effectively diminished the intended sense of tension and suspense. Additionally, the lighting could have been more consistent, with some scenes appearing overexposed while others were shrouded in darkness, making it challenging to discern crucial details.
Missed Opportunities for Atmosphere
Given the film's paranormal subject matter, there were ample opportunities to create an atmosphere of dread and unease. However, the filmmakers should have capitalized on these moments, resulting in a lack of genuine tension and suspense. Sound design and visual effects could have been leveraged to heighten the sense of the otherworldly. Still, these elements could have been utilized or executed better, diminishing the film's overall impact.
A Glimmer of Promise
Despite the technical shortcomings, there were moments when the film's premise shone through, offering glimpses of its potential. Exploring the paranormal and the concept of shadows harboring otherworldly entities was intriguing. They could have been captivating if presented with more remarkable finesse and attention to detail. The filmmakers' ambition and willingness to tackle such a unique subject matter deserve recognition, demonstrating a desire to push boundaries and explore uncharted territory.
In conclusion, while "The Shape of Shadows" presented an exciting and entertaining premise, its lack of production value and technical proficiency ultimately undermined its validity and impact. As a moviegoer, I implore the creators to learn from this experience and strive for greater technical mastery in their future endeavors. With a firmer grasp of sound capture, videography, and atmospheric storytelling, their next project could truly shine and captivate audiences with its unique vision and exploration of the paranormal.
Expedition Bigfoot (2019)
Fun Show but no science
Hey....do you hear that...it's a show that uses technology to mask the bs (bad science). It's an entertaining show with a script and weird plots, but not something that would lead anyone to believe this Bigfoot exists. Native stories are interesting and it's difficult to trust anyone sharing their experience. Sharing on a tv show doesn't validate nor give credibility to anyone.
In the end, If you need to waste some time give it a whirl.
Hey....do you hear that...it's a show that uses technology to mask the bs (bad science). It's an entertaining show with a script and weird plots, but not something that would lead anyone to believe this Bigfoot exists. Native stories are interesting and it's difficult to trust anyone sharing their experience. Sharing on a tv show doesn't validate nor give credibility to anyone.
In the end, If you need to waste some time give it a whirl.
On the Trail of UFOs: Dark Sky (2021)
Not a deep diver....
Not exactly revealing, nor quality if you've watched Hellier. This docs crew tries but falls short. The story telling struggles in cadence, narrative quality, and it feels aimlessly. Unfortunately this doc doesn't go beyond superficial, but hope they nail the next one.
Phantom Rider (2020)
It tries....
Im sure this documentary style resonates with his fans, but overall the editing and vfx interfere with determining the truth. Their lack of story telling, videography, and tech beings me to the conclusion their podcasters wanting to a buck.
Y: The Last Man (2021)
What a show....
Theres glimpses what to like, but overall its a hot mess. The son is a petulant adult child - great acting- and the daughters (Cheney look a like) coup that develops is predictable. Its a show that is filled with great actors faced with sub par writing. Patience is a must when watching cause its a fast food burrito.
On the Trail of UFOs (2020)
Poor camera work in vital points and..
If your attempting to show proof or be a legitimate investigative documentary you need new material. The film is a vain attempt and doesn't provide substance to what is already well documented. It's a YouTube attempt at the subject.