Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Billy Elliot (2000)
10/10
There is a little boy (child) inside all of us
21 May 2001
I watched this movie knowing little about it except that it was about a boy who challenged social stereotypes to take up dancing. I don't know what I expected, but I was not prepared for the marvel to which I was about to sit down. Without trying to give any of the movie away, there is little doubt that this movie has tons within it to appeal to the sentimental romantic. But it is not Forrest Gump. There is nothing improbable about this movie. It heralds brilliant performances by actors who have laid the hearts of their characters bare for all to view. There can be few dry eyes when the father is torn between his rigid ideals and the honest love he has to bring his son a future. To bears repeating again, however, there is no schlock to this moment.

As a social commentary, this film ranks highly with Brassed Off, another political critique on Thatcherism and the cost it exacted of coal mining communities. Both films poignantly examine these costs by bringing the lesser known's, the miners and their families, to centre stage. Quirky they might seem, but life is full of quirkiness, especially if one has the courage to throw off the mantles of social constraints and conformity.

It is hard to believe that Stephen Daldry is a first time screen director in this effort. But then, maybe it is not that surprising. Good theatre often makes its audience work and requires it to pay attention. The direction and allusions are often subtle but are hard to miss. We don't need to be ‘told' that Billy's mother is dead by a character. Instead, we see the family interacting, and a couple of photographs, and we can deduce the rest. We are not told about the mining strike in as many words at the beginning, but the emergence of police tells us that we're in for a time of confrontation. Then we see the posters. We see the Billy's friend Debbie run her stick along wall (as children will do) and then across a battery of police shields … a darkly comic moment, but so telling of so many things including: the innocence of the children in a reeling world and the omnipresence of a police state in these small towns. In other words, we enter ‘into' the screen and become almost ghostlike participants in the narrative, like Scrooge being led by the ghost of Christmas present. Perhaps that is why the emotions we feel are so powerful and so draining by the end. We have lived these characters' lives with them.

The performances deserved much more recognition at the Oscars than it received. It is not surprising that Jamie Bell didn't receive a nomination for playing Billy, but he sure played a hell of a role. I guess the Academy can only reward so many first time performances but this is one that deserved mention. Jamie is Billy, or at least he comes across like he is … and that is great acting, regardless of the actor's age. Strong and memorable performances are also provided by Jamie Draven (brother Tony) and Julie Walters (dance teacher, Mrs Wilkinson). The performance Gary Lewis (Dad) is also well presented though I can't help feeling that the role was written powerfully regardless of the actor.

Thus far, of the movies of 2000, I'd rank this only behind Crouching Tiger and in the company of The Contender and Wonder Boys. I easily gave the movie a 9-10 rating. A must see for all.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ride with the Devil (I) (1999)
9/10
There are no heros ... just great film makers
2 April 2001
Easily 9 out of 10 for a film by director we will continue to grow to admire. But don't watch this movie expecting to be "entertained." Ang Lee takes an objective look at a relatively unexplored aspect of the Civil War. What is beautiful about the movie, like all of Lee's films, is that he doesn't "side" with his characters. He creates characters, embodies them with life, problems, and ambiguity ... and endows them with a reality that often hits far closer to home than with which many are comfortable. This film has action, but it is not for the action lover since the violence is deeply disturbing and far from gratuitous ... i.e. like the characters, it is real. And as you would expect about one of mankind's most horrific wars, the violence is horrific.

But as an exploration of the greater human ambiguity that surely dwelt within the Civil War, it is a masterpiece. Was the war about slavery and an abolitionism? Lee seems quite willing to blur that line made so popular in depictions like the Blue and the Grey. Neither is about idealism, though, as seen in Gone with the Wind. It is about freedom, about the desire to have something which is yours and to fight for it. As you watch the characters, you will ask yourself "how can they be fighting to preserve slavery?" The fact is, I don't think they really are, and in that the film shows the problem of why so many were caught up in the maelstrom of the Civil War.

The fact seems clear that many of the characters we learn about are fighting out of senses of loyalty to "home" though they may never have examined what home represents or whether they truly espouse its values. The letter scenes are very moving and yet subtle. Jake and Daniel are other examples of loyalty stretched to the limits. And when the tension finally snaps, and these characters find themselves suddenly "free" ... we see the birth of new men.

All this mixed in with Lee's beautiful incorporation of humankind's environment with breathtaking vistas and frames. Lee has a style which is his, somehow European in its "art" (a slow camera, unrushed), Asian in its epic-ness and development of story, and yet somehow familiar and easily accessible to so many in North Americans.

Relax, let go of your preconceptions about what the Civil War is, what the "western" as a genre is, what a war movie should be ... and let Ang Lee take you into a world so fragile, so hard, so real that few of us can comfortably see it.

In this, Lee continues what he wrought in Ice Storm. Again, the movie is slow paced and without apparent "direction" ... a sure sign of Lee's ability to direct without "imposing" himself on the story or screen. His direction is amplified by what he brings out of Jewel (yes, the singer), a hitherto unproven actress who puts in an amazing performance.

A movie for those who love film and are not lovers of the standard Hollywood epic.
80 out of 86 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed