This HAS to be made into an adapted screenplay blockbuster for the big screen. I followed this breaking story closely back in 2018 and was absolutely captivated by it at the time. The Rescue sheds so much more light on the incredible store of the Thai cave rescue. It is almost a fairytale - the Myanmar monk who foretold the finale, the torrential monsoon rains that held off until the moment the last child had been rescued, the relationship between the cave diving hero and his love interest who just so happened to hail from the nearby Thai town. Fate. Everyone should watch The Rescue. I can't wait for the Hollywood adaptation.
Reviews
34 Reviews
Pokémon: Detective Pikachu
(2019)
Huge Potential for Live Action Pokemon
16 June 2021
Going forward I think live action Pokemon movies have massive potential, they just didn't get it quite right with Detective Pikachu. The story is weak and to be honest probably too convoluted for target audiences to understand. While kids might enjoy the humour it falls flat for adult viewers - the best family flicks get that balance just right.
It's well worth a watch for fans of the franchise, but it's not a classic instalment.
It's well worth a watch for fans of the franchise, but it's not a classic instalment.
28 Days Later
(2002)
Didn't Meet Expectations
4 May 2021
I've had this film on my watch list for some time now and really wanted to love it, but was left disappointed. The dialogue is poor, character development is even worse and the relationships between characters is forced and uninteresting. I found myself picking holes in the logic throughout. There are literally endless directions the plot could've been taken - it offered promise but did not meet its potential.
Danny Boyle's cinematography is typically stylish and despite everything it is a good turn from Cillian Murphy. Plus one star as well for the theme, which is iconic and one of my favourites from any film ever.
Unfortunately, overall I was left bitterly disappointed. 6/10.
Danny Boyle's cinematography is typically stylish and despite everything it is a good turn from Cillian Murphy. Plus one star as well for the theme, which is iconic and one of my favourites from any film ever.
Unfortunately, overall I was left bitterly disappointed. 6/10.
Donnie Darko
(2001)
Incomprehensible without Companion Guide
14 February 2021
I started watching Donnie Darko expecting a classic horror, only to come out the other end with my head spinning from the superhero, super sci-fi psychological thriller that I had just witnessed. I'll admit I was totally bamboozled when the credits rolled - I hadn't even realised what I'd watched was actually a well disguised superhero flick until I done some research online. If ever a movie required a second viewing, this is it.
What I will say is I have no idea how anyone could understand Donnie Darko or even begin to fathom the story it tells by viewing the film alone. To understand Donnie Darko, you must expose yourself to the works of Roberta Sparrow AKA Grandmother Death. The Philosophy of Time Travel provides something of a companion guide to the film. It is an entirely fictional book of course. In the world of Donnie Darko however, it is entirely fact.
I believe some sort of directors cut was released years later that provided the source material for all these Reddit wonks and film buffs to fully digest Donnie Darko and put it in a form that I could understand. Only now can I fully appreciate the creativity and ingenuity of this film. For the writers to create such a complex cinematic universe and fine tune it until not a single hole in the plot can be picked, it really is a work of art.
I recommend clearing your head of all expectations before watching this film. Then go to the website to find your companion guide The Philosophy of Time Travel and give it a read (caution it does contain spoilers). Then watch the film again. I believe this is the best way to gain maximum enjoyment and appreciation of the incredible Donnie Darko.
What I will say is I have no idea how anyone could understand Donnie Darko or even begin to fathom the story it tells by viewing the film alone. To understand Donnie Darko, you must expose yourself to the works of Roberta Sparrow AKA Grandmother Death. The Philosophy of Time Travel provides something of a companion guide to the film. It is an entirely fictional book of course. In the world of Donnie Darko however, it is entirely fact.
I believe some sort of directors cut was released years later that provided the source material for all these Reddit wonks and film buffs to fully digest Donnie Darko and put it in a form that I could understand. Only now can I fully appreciate the creativity and ingenuity of this film. For the writers to create such a complex cinematic universe and fine tune it until not a single hole in the plot can be picked, it really is a work of art.
I recommend clearing your head of all expectations before watching this film. Then go to the website to find your companion guide The Philosophy of Time Travel and give it a read (caution it does contain spoilers). Then watch the film again. I believe this is the best way to gain maximum enjoyment and appreciation of the incredible Donnie Darko.
The Gentlemen
(2019)
Guy Ritchie Back to His Best
14 November 2020
This movie should be rated way higher. It's Guy Ritchie back to his best, and for me The Gentlemen is every bit as good as Snatch and Lock Stock. At times the dialogue walks a racial tightrope, which I don't think has helped the overall rating here, while the C-bomb is used generously throughout. From what I've read online, this latter fact has horrified American viewers, who seemingly have not yet adopted the C-word as a staple of the English language as us Brits have.
For any American viewer confused by this cultural phenomenon, I'll hand you over to The Coach (Colin Farrell) who hits the nail on the head when explaining to one of his boys that the word can be used as a term of "familial affection". That scene had me laughing out loud - it's also a perfect example of an instance whereby the script wobbles that aforementioned tightrope.
I believe I loved The Gentlemen for aspects that other viewers hated. I'm sure what can be universally agreed however is the acting, soundtrack and storytelling are all absolutely on point. Special shoutouts must go to Hugh Grant, Charlie Hunnam and Colin Farrell, who were all especially fantastic. Overall, The Gentlemen is a must watch. 9/10.
For any American viewer confused by this cultural phenomenon, I'll hand you over to The Coach (Colin Farrell) who hits the nail on the head when explaining to one of his boys that the word can be used as a term of "familial affection". That scene had me laughing out loud - it's also a perfect example of an instance whereby the script wobbles that aforementioned tightrope.
I believe I loved The Gentlemen for aspects that other viewers hated. I'm sure what can be universally agreed however is the acting, soundtrack and storytelling are all absolutely on point. Special shoutouts must go to Hugh Grant, Charlie Hunnam and Colin Farrell, who were all especially fantastic. Overall, The Gentlemen is a must watch. 9/10.
Captain Marvel
(2019)
Avengers Origins
5 August 2020
My expectations going into Captain Marvel were low based on the fact that the only MCU film with a lower IMDB rating is The Incredible Hulk. In all honesty I really didn't think it was that bad. By no means one of the better Marvel films, but not worthy of its current rating <7.
A lot of the Disney humour was not as funny as I've found it to be in previous instalments, and Carol Danvers herself doesn't have the personality to match any of our other beloved MCU heroes. I'm led to believe Brie Larson is indeed a world class actress, with an Oscar under her belt for best actress in a leading role in a film called Room. Based on her performance in Captain Marvel, you couldn't tell. This personality void is filled somewhat by a young Nick Fury, who I guess the film gives as much of a back story to as Captain Marvel herself. It's obvious Samuel L Jackson had a lot of fun in this role, and the CGI used to make his character appear 25 years younger is applaudable. I've read a lot about the fact that Captain Marvel contradicts some of Fury's history as revealed in Winter Soldier, but personally I don't take enough issue with this to allow it to lower my rating, which I believe many other viewers have. The one issue I did take with Fury's character in Captain Marvel however was his depiction as flamboyant and foolish, which while fun, made it difficult to imagine this comical agent transforming into the authoritative S.H.I.E.L.D. director that we all know he is destined to be. Overall I was just grateful for more Nick Fury screen time, who is still the coolest character in the MCU.
The plot was quite messy and difficult to follow at times. There were shades of Top Gun (in fact, there were blatant references to Top Gun - Goose the cat/Flerken thing perhaps??) and Jason Bourne, which both appealed to me greatly and probably boosted my appreciation of the film. The soundtrack attempts to follow a Guardians of the Galaxy blueprint with a 90's twist, which is a nice idea on paper but never really makes any sort of impact. Finally, I enjoyed the closing scene where Fury (with his shiny new eyepatch) is typing up his "protector initiative". This was a classy touch by the writers and has influenced my view of Captain Marvel as more of an Avengers origins story than anything else. At least this way Carol Danvers doesn't feel so irrelevant to the bigger picture after all. 7/10.
A lot of the Disney humour was not as funny as I've found it to be in previous instalments, and Carol Danvers herself doesn't have the personality to match any of our other beloved MCU heroes. I'm led to believe Brie Larson is indeed a world class actress, with an Oscar under her belt for best actress in a leading role in a film called Room. Based on her performance in Captain Marvel, you couldn't tell. This personality void is filled somewhat by a young Nick Fury, who I guess the film gives as much of a back story to as Captain Marvel herself. It's obvious Samuel L Jackson had a lot of fun in this role, and the CGI used to make his character appear 25 years younger is applaudable. I've read a lot about the fact that Captain Marvel contradicts some of Fury's history as revealed in Winter Soldier, but personally I don't take enough issue with this to allow it to lower my rating, which I believe many other viewers have. The one issue I did take with Fury's character in Captain Marvel however was his depiction as flamboyant and foolish, which while fun, made it difficult to imagine this comical agent transforming into the authoritative S.H.I.E.L.D. director that we all know he is destined to be. Overall I was just grateful for more Nick Fury screen time, who is still the coolest character in the MCU.
The plot was quite messy and difficult to follow at times. There were shades of Top Gun (in fact, there were blatant references to Top Gun - Goose the cat/Flerken thing perhaps??) and Jason Bourne, which both appealed to me greatly and probably boosted my appreciation of the film. The soundtrack attempts to follow a Guardians of the Galaxy blueprint with a 90's twist, which is a nice idea on paper but never really makes any sort of impact. Finally, I enjoyed the closing scene where Fury (with his shiny new eyepatch) is typing up his "protector initiative". This was a classy touch by the writers and has influenced my view of Captain Marvel as more of an Avengers origins story than anything else. At least this way Carol Danvers doesn't feel so irrelevant to the bigger picture after all. 7/10.
Silver Linings Playbook
(2012)
A Poignant Rom-Com
16 July 2020
I finished this film and read a touching review submitted by a man long suffering from bipolar disorder. As a pharmacy graduate it is a mental illness I have studied and reflecting on this reviewers honest insight I believe Silver Linings Playbook serves as an incredible portrayal of the lifestyle and personality of an individual afflicted with manic bipolar disorder. Bradley Cooper carries the lead role extremely well - I actually believe it is his career best performance - and his chemistry with Jennifer Lawrence is what the success of the production cruxes on.
I would best describe Silver Linings Playbook as a poignant rom-com, and credit must be given to the director and the whole cast for pulling off such a genre bending feat so successfully. There were just a few things about this film that I didn't get, which ultimately has lowered my rating somewhat. I don't get why Pat (Cooper) was so hung up on his ex wife the whole film if he decided he was in love with Tiffany (Lawrence) the night he met her. The heavy American football theme throughout was a miss - it was actually the least interesting angle of the movie, and I usually always enjoy themes of sports in films. It just felt like a little bit of a distraction from the main story and the relationship unfolding between the two lead characters.
The viewer is led to believe that Silver Linings Playbook closes with a happy ending, but I'm not so naive to believe that two people suffering from quite serious mental health issues will constitute a stable relationship. We want the best for Pat, but I felt more grief than joy at the end as I don't believe Tiffany is the most sensible suitor for him in this moment in time. As the final credits roll, I sensed there is a lot more turmoil ahead for Pat and his family.
Regardless, Silver Linings Playbook is another hit from director David O. Russel. If I could, I'd give it a 7.5/10.
I would best describe Silver Linings Playbook as a poignant rom-com, and credit must be given to the director and the whole cast for pulling off such a genre bending feat so successfully. There were just a few things about this film that I didn't get, which ultimately has lowered my rating somewhat. I don't get why Pat (Cooper) was so hung up on his ex wife the whole film if he decided he was in love with Tiffany (Lawrence) the night he met her. The heavy American football theme throughout was a miss - it was actually the least interesting angle of the movie, and I usually always enjoy themes of sports in films. It just felt like a little bit of a distraction from the main story and the relationship unfolding between the two lead characters.
The viewer is led to believe that Silver Linings Playbook closes with a happy ending, but I'm not so naive to believe that two people suffering from quite serious mental health issues will constitute a stable relationship. We want the best for Pat, but I felt more grief than joy at the end as I don't believe Tiffany is the most sensible suitor for him in this moment in time. As the final credits roll, I sensed there is a lot more turmoil ahead for Pat and his family.
Regardless, Silver Linings Playbook is another hit from director David O. Russel. If I could, I'd give it a 7.5/10.
Midsommar
(2019)
Cinema of the Unsettling
15 July 2020
Anyone who is a fan of The US Office will remember that Halloween episode in season eight where Gabe exposes everyone to his homemade horror, self proclaimed as a "cinema of the unsettling" movie - an avant garde film genre defined by its disturbing images and absence of plot. Midsommar is the first real life film I've seen that conforms to the criteria of this genre. Judging by some of the 10/10 reviews for Midsommar that I've read on IMDB, not only fictional creeps like Gabe enjoy this disturbing cinema. But it wasn't really for me.
The film opens with a definite sense of plot and direction which continues up until the characters arrive in Sweden, at which point all concept of plot is lost and Midsommar becomes a playlist of one disturbing act to the next. The shocking event at the start of the film goes on to bear not much relevancy over the next two hours, giving further credibility to the theory that this film is solely purposed to present as many loosely connected traumatising scenes as possible.
Nonetheless it was well acted by Florence Pugh throughout. I like Will Poulter but was disappointed to see him given a backseat role. The cinematography was on point and threatened to boost my rating higher, but at the end of the day Midsommar has genuinely left me with mild trauma and for that I can't go any higher than 6/10.
Honestly, I felt the need to cover my girlfriend's eyes at some points - that's the best indication I can give of how explicit, gory and horrifying Midsommar truly is. Also, my friend mentioned that his flatmate bought the extended cut on Blu-ray, and from now on I'm going to be wary of that guy. Honest to God I believe anyone who enjoyed this movie so much to the point they're actively investing in additional scenes should be placed on some sort of register at the point of sale. Questionable behaviour to say the least.
The film opens with a definite sense of plot and direction which continues up until the characters arrive in Sweden, at which point all concept of plot is lost and Midsommar becomes a playlist of one disturbing act to the next. The shocking event at the start of the film goes on to bear not much relevancy over the next two hours, giving further credibility to the theory that this film is solely purposed to present as many loosely connected traumatising scenes as possible.
Nonetheless it was well acted by Florence Pugh throughout. I like Will Poulter but was disappointed to see him given a backseat role. The cinematography was on point and threatened to boost my rating higher, but at the end of the day Midsommar has genuinely left me with mild trauma and for that I can't go any higher than 6/10.
Honestly, I felt the need to cover my girlfriend's eyes at some points - that's the best indication I can give of how explicit, gory and horrifying Midsommar truly is. Also, my friend mentioned that his flatmate bought the extended cut on Blu-ray, and from now on I'm going to be wary of that guy. Honest to God I believe anyone who enjoyed this movie so much to the point they're actively investing in additional scenes should be placed on some sort of register at the point of sale. Questionable behaviour to say the least.
The Truman Show
(1998)
Easter Egg Extravaganza
13 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I absolutely loved The Truman Show! What a film, both funny and mentally stimulating. It's as though every single camera shot and every single line of dialogue is used to conceal an Easter egg. A flash of lightning illuminating the moon to suggest the orbital satellite is much closer to Earth than it should be? Truman taking vitamin D pills with his breakfast every morning to hint at the fact he has never been exposed to actual sunlight? These are just a couple of the clues I picked up on my first watch that give away the intricacies of Truman's world - I cannot wait for my second watch to discover more.
I honestly believe The Truman Show might be the founding father of 21st century reality TV - I wouldn't be at all surprised to find the idea for Big Brother was born after the producers watched this film.
Jim Carrey carries the lead superbly, influencing the viewer to really sympathise with Truman and want the best for him (this is what makes the ending so triumphant). He was hard done by not to receive an Oscar nomination for the role. The supporting cast are all detestable in their efforts to block Truman from discovering the truth. I don't think I'll be able to watch Ozark now without questioning Laura Linney's genuineness as Wendy Bird - is she really in it for the family money laundering business or is her role simply to promote and explicitly advertise tourism in Missouri? After the impression she has left on me as Meryl Burbank in The Truman Show, watching Ozark may never be the same again.
I really wish the runtime had been longer, even if only by an extra 15 minutes to take the total up to 2 hours - it's just one of those films I was willing desperately not to end! Also I wish we got to see what happens to Truman after he walks through that black door, particularly his reunion with Sylvia. I guess the ending was purposefully left open to interpretation, but it would've been a satisfying feel good closing scene to watch the star crossed lovers finally unite.
Overall, my only criticism can be The Truman Show left me wanting more. 9/10.
I honestly believe The Truman Show might be the founding father of 21st century reality TV - I wouldn't be at all surprised to find the idea for Big Brother was born after the producers watched this film.
Jim Carrey carries the lead superbly, influencing the viewer to really sympathise with Truman and want the best for him (this is what makes the ending so triumphant). He was hard done by not to receive an Oscar nomination for the role. The supporting cast are all detestable in their efforts to block Truman from discovering the truth. I don't think I'll be able to watch Ozark now without questioning Laura Linney's genuineness as Wendy Bird - is she really in it for the family money laundering business or is her role simply to promote and explicitly advertise tourism in Missouri? After the impression she has left on me as Meryl Burbank in The Truman Show, watching Ozark may never be the same again.
I really wish the runtime had been longer, even if only by an extra 15 minutes to take the total up to 2 hours - it's just one of those films I was willing desperately not to end! Also I wish we got to see what happens to Truman after he walks through that black door, particularly his reunion with Sylvia. I guess the ending was purposefully left open to interpretation, but it would've been a satisfying feel good closing scene to watch the star crossed lovers finally unite.
Overall, my only criticism can be The Truman Show left me wanting more. 9/10.
The Green Mile
(1999)
A King and Darabont Masterpiece
8 July 2020
The Green Mile was the first Stephen King book I ever read. It was the novel that really got me into this great author and I loved it. What the big screen adaptation achieves so elegantly - something I'm scarcely aware of other adapted screenplays accomplishing - is an unwavering commitment to portray the source material exactly as it is inscribed. Literally page by page no detail is spared by Frank Darabont, who excels so incredibly as a movie maker in the prison setting. And I think that is what I love most about The Green Mile - it's loyalty to King's original works.
This alone would not have been enough to doubtlessly convince me to award this film a 10/10 rating however. It is an absolute masterpiece, transcending genres to present something that is so unique and irreplicable. The 3 hour runtime barely feels that long - the story takes all the time it needs to flesh out the characters (prisoners and guards alike) and to afford every detail. Tom Hanks carries the lead perfectly (of course) and he is supported by some outstanding performances, most mentionably by the late Michael Clarke Duncan as John Coffey (like the drink, only not spelled the same) and Doug Hutchison as the despicable Percy Wetmore. Let's just say these two characters blur the line (or at least the steel bars of a prison cell) between good and evil.
I genuinely don't think I have any criticism or negative comments to offer here. I would recommend The Green Mile to absolutely anyone, and encourage viewers to read the book as well to gain an appreciation of just how well the story is represented by Darabont's classic. Very easily, 10/10.
This alone would not have been enough to doubtlessly convince me to award this film a 10/10 rating however. It is an absolute masterpiece, transcending genres to present something that is so unique and irreplicable. The 3 hour runtime barely feels that long - the story takes all the time it needs to flesh out the characters (prisoners and guards alike) and to afford every detail. Tom Hanks carries the lead perfectly (of course) and he is supported by some outstanding performances, most mentionably by the late Michael Clarke Duncan as John Coffey (like the drink, only not spelled the same) and Doug Hutchison as the despicable Percy Wetmore. Let's just say these two characters blur the line (or at least the steel bars of a prison cell) between good and evil.
I genuinely don't think I have any criticism or negative comments to offer here. I would recommend The Green Mile to absolutely anyone, and encourage viewers to read the book as well to gain an appreciation of just how well the story is represented by Darabont's classic. Very easily, 10/10.
The Pursuit of Happyness
(2006)
Thought Provoking and Emotional
2 July 2020
In The Pursuit of Happyness the writers have succeeded immensely in gripping the audience with a simple plot, which is no easy feat. Perhaps the credit must go to Will Smith (Chris Gardner), who quite frankly I had no idea was capable of such a performance. Before this film I had only ever seen Smith in Bad Guys (a mediocre watch), but all of a sudden I'm enthused to watch everything he's led the line in from Men in Black to Seven Pounds. Using his actual son Jaden in the role of Chris' son was a very effective touch - you can really feel the love and father to son bond emanating from the screen.
The film displays some important themes around social injustice and inequality in America without ever crossing boundaries into exploring racial issues, which I liked (although really it is a shame, or else Pursuit of Happyness just might've won the Oscar for Best Picture ahead of The Departed). I thought the ending seemed a little rushed, with all matters resolving themselves in an almost montage scene, so I guess I would've liked to see an extra 10/15 minutes run time or whatever to match the pace of the climax to the rest of the story. One little plot point that snagged with me somewhat revolves around the way Chris is portrayed to be a super genius with incredible levels of charisma (in other words, uber employable) yet somehow finds himself in the predicament he is in. Maybe I'm being naive to the harsh reality of poverty and it's ability to reach out and trap even the best among us. It gets you thinking I suppose.
And that's what I love most about The Pursuit of Happyness. Not the raw emotion of the acting, not the simplistic yet captivating plot, but the thought provoking nature of the overriding message. I watched this film nearly a week ago now and I'm still mulling it over. Are we ever truly happy in life? Or, like Chris, are we running around constantly, in a never ending pursuit of happiness.
The film displays some important themes around social injustice and inequality in America without ever crossing boundaries into exploring racial issues, which I liked (although really it is a shame, or else Pursuit of Happyness just might've won the Oscar for Best Picture ahead of The Departed). I thought the ending seemed a little rushed, with all matters resolving themselves in an almost montage scene, so I guess I would've liked to see an extra 10/15 minutes run time or whatever to match the pace of the climax to the rest of the story. One little plot point that snagged with me somewhat revolves around the way Chris is portrayed to be a super genius with incredible levels of charisma (in other words, uber employable) yet somehow finds himself in the predicament he is in. Maybe I'm being naive to the harsh reality of poverty and it's ability to reach out and trap even the best among us. It gets you thinking I suppose.
And that's what I love most about The Pursuit of Happyness. Not the raw emotion of the acting, not the simplistic yet captivating plot, but the thought provoking nature of the overriding message. I watched this film nearly a week ago now and I'm still mulling it over. Are we ever truly happy in life? Or, like Chris, are we running around constantly, in a never ending pursuit of happiness.
Moneyball
(2011)
A Staple for Sports Fans
24 June 2020
Everything I know about baseball stems from a childhood playing Wii Sports - home runs are good, and if you get three strikes you're out. So in Moneyball when Brad Pitt and Jonah Hill start talking about players "getting on base" and the like, I didn't have much of a clue what the script was. Nonetheless I still found the plot of the film to be very interesting and gripping, I just felt more could have been done to help viewers lacking in baseball knowledge understand the jargon getting thrown around.
Jonah Hill isn't credited enough for his range of acting, as he plays the intimidated and awkward Ivy League graduate stats man Peter Brand. I loved the on screen relationship between him and Pitt - it really stood out as one of my highlights of the film. Pitt himself is charismatic as ever, his character Billy Beane fleshed out with a compelling back story that alongside his passion and utmost desire to win brings the viewer fully onside, supporting Beane all the way. That's what makes Moneyball such a feel good flick.
Overall I thoroughly enjoyed Moneyball and was grossly invested in the themes on display. It provides a fascinating insight into how major sports teams function behind the scenes and has successfully convinced me to take more of an interest in baseball. I'd recommend Moneyball to any fan of sports, not just baseball, as the financial inequalities throughout teams in the MLB can quite easily be reflected in any major sport - particularly football.
If you're smart enough to realise how the story and themes of Moneyball are applicable to the sport you love then you'll enjoy Moneyball as much as I did. 8/10.
Jonah Hill isn't credited enough for his range of acting, as he plays the intimidated and awkward Ivy League graduate stats man Peter Brand. I loved the on screen relationship between him and Pitt - it really stood out as one of my highlights of the film. Pitt himself is charismatic as ever, his character Billy Beane fleshed out with a compelling back story that alongside his passion and utmost desire to win brings the viewer fully onside, supporting Beane all the way. That's what makes Moneyball such a feel good flick.
Overall I thoroughly enjoyed Moneyball and was grossly invested in the themes on display. It provides a fascinating insight into how major sports teams function behind the scenes and has successfully convinced me to take more of an interest in baseball. I'd recommend Moneyball to any fan of sports, not just baseball, as the financial inequalities throughout teams in the MLB can quite easily be reflected in any major sport - particularly football.
If you're smart enough to realise how the story and themes of Moneyball are applicable to the sport you love then you'll enjoy Moneyball as much as I did. 8/10.
Spider-Man: Far from Home
(2019)
Effective Phase 3 Epilogue
15 June 2020
Spider-Man: Far from Home holds the unfortunate title of being the only film I've ever fallen asleep to while watching in the cinema. Having now rewatched Marvel's latest blockbuster I can firmly say that episode of snoring in Cineworld was induced by a lack of sleep the night before, and not the content on display.
Tom Holland gives his best performance as Spider-Man yet. In other reboots it is often easy to forget (or even hard to believe) that Peter Parker is only a school aged kid, but Holland plays the role so convincingly. The viewer feels a lot of sympathy for Peter throughout Far from Home as he struggles with the burden of being expected to fill Iron Man's shoes, all the while proving to be more relatable than ever as he endeavours to enjoy his school trip and win over the girl he likes. Speaking of which, Zendaya's inclusion in Homecoming finally makes sense now - I should've known the writers would have more use for her character in later instalments.
Jake Gyllenhaal also plays his role applaudably well, his character as unlikable as ever. Despite Peter's frequent references to pop culture throughout the series he clearly hasn't seen Nightcrawler, or else his tingle might've warned him against trusting the cunning Mysterio.
I love how these Spider-Man films examine the effects of the Avengers on the microcosmic environment of Peter's high school, where they study Thor in physics. This dynamic was especially effective in highlighting the complications of the blip and how humanity has dealt with the outcome of Endgame. Therefore Spider-Man: Far from Home serves as an effective epilogue to Phase 3 of the MCU, and I am grateful that Disney and Sony have worked out their differences to ensure we get to see what becomes of Spider-Man after that jaw dropping post credits cliffhanger. Whenever the next instalment may hit cinemas, I'm certain that this time round I'll manage to stay awake.
Tom Holland gives his best performance as Spider-Man yet. In other reboots it is often easy to forget (or even hard to believe) that Peter Parker is only a school aged kid, but Holland plays the role so convincingly. The viewer feels a lot of sympathy for Peter throughout Far from Home as he struggles with the burden of being expected to fill Iron Man's shoes, all the while proving to be more relatable than ever as he endeavours to enjoy his school trip and win over the girl he likes. Speaking of which, Zendaya's inclusion in Homecoming finally makes sense now - I should've known the writers would have more use for her character in later instalments.
Jake Gyllenhaal also plays his role applaudably well, his character as unlikable as ever. Despite Peter's frequent references to pop culture throughout the series he clearly hasn't seen Nightcrawler, or else his tingle might've warned him against trusting the cunning Mysterio.
I love how these Spider-Man films examine the effects of the Avengers on the microcosmic environment of Peter's high school, where they study Thor in physics. This dynamic was especially effective in highlighting the complications of the blip and how humanity has dealt with the outcome of Endgame. Therefore Spider-Man: Far from Home serves as an effective epilogue to Phase 3 of the MCU, and I am grateful that Disney and Sony have worked out their differences to ensure we get to see what becomes of Spider-Man after that jaw dropping post credits cliffhanger. Whenever the next instalment may hit cinemas, I'm certain that this time round I'll manage to stay awake.
Breathtaking Finale
14 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is an incredible end to the Harry Potter series. It gets off to an action packed start and the story doesn't slow down for a single second. There are so many magnificent scenes that after all these years still serve in giving me goosebumps - Neville's rallying speech; Snape's pensieve revelations; Harry, Ron and Hermione's dash through the battlefield on their way to the boathouse - I could go on all day.
I've always felt however certain big character deaths are not done justice and could've been more emotional. Especially Fred, who's death I wish had been shown on screen - imagine the impact this would've had! He's done the most injustice, as in not too many scenes later the poor boy's own mother is giggling away after offing Bellatrix Lestrange, seemingly past mourning her son's death already.
Overall however this can be my only criticism, and nothing stops Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 from cementing itself as one of my favourite films of all time - 10/10.
I've always felt however certain big character deaths are not done justice and could've been more emotional. Especially Fred, who's death I wish had been shown on screen - imagine the impact this would've had! He's done the most injustice, as in not too many scenes later the poor boy's own mother is giggling away after offing Bellatrix Lestrange, seemingly past mourning her son's death already.
Overall however this can be my only criticism, and nothing stops Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 from cementing itself as one of my favourite films of all time - 10/10.
O Brother, Where Art Thou?
(2000)
Needs Rewatching
13 June 2020
Every time I watch a Coen Brothers flick I walk away feeling unsatisfied with my initial viewing (with the exception of Fargo, the brilliance of which is explicit). In the case of No Country For Old Men and The Big Lebowski I recall being very eager to start over, almost immediately as the final credits rolled. With O Brother, Where Art Thou? however I don't feel so ready to rewatch right away. My enjoyment of my first viewing was lacking somewhat compared to Lebowski and NCFOM. Nonetheless I will ensure I give OBWAT a second chance at some point to see if my initial rating can be boosted.
I didn't particularly care much for the soundtrack, which is getting a lot of praise amongst other reviewers. I've read comments suggesting the film grows on you as it progresses, which I agree with but must note it takes over an hour of runtime before this takes effect. Before Clooney's revelation about the truth behind his "buried treasure" (which with some prior knowledge of Homer's Odyssey would not come as a shock or twist at all to the viewer) the film presents itself as one disjointed scene after another. I would actually recommend researching a brief summary of Odyssey before watching OBWAT, as I feel this could make certain scenes and characters seem less random and therefore more enjoyable. For instance John Goodman's cameo does not seem so bizarre upon reflection, having now garnered some awareness of Odysseus' foe the cyclops.
Credit where it's due, O Brother, Where Art Thou? does serve well as a comedy and I did find myself laughing throughout. And kudos to the Coen Brothers for managing to tie up every loose end of their rambling sketch show-like story. My overall enjoyment of the film is reflected in my rating however, and until I get round to rewatching O Brother, Where Art Thou? I must stick with 6/10.
I didn't particularly care much for the soundtrack, which is getting a lot of praise amongst other reviewers. I've read comments suggesting the film grows on you as it progresses, which I agree with but must note it takes over an hour of runtime before this takes effect. Before Clooney's revelation about the truth behind his "buried treasure" (which with some prior knowledge of Homer's Odyssey would not come as a shock or twist at all to the viewer) the film presents itself as one disjointed scene after another. I would actually recommend researching a brief summary of Odyssey before watching OBWAT, as I feel this could make certain scenes and characters seem less random and therefore more enjoyable. For instance John Goodman's cameo does not seem so bizarre upon reflection, having now garnered some awareness of Odysseus' foe the cyclops.
Credit where it's due, O Brother, Where Art Thou? does serve well as a comedy and I did find myself laughing throughout. And kudos to the Coen Brothers for managing to tie up every loose end of their rambling sketch show-like story. My overall enjoyment of the film is reflected in my rating however, and until I get round to rewatching O Brother, Where Art Thou? I must stick with 6/10.
Avengers: Endgame
(2019)
-1 for Time Travel
5 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Avengers: Endgame will initially leave you with a 10/10 impression, but it isn't long before the gaping plot holes come to light upon reflection of the 3 hour blockbuster. My eyes actually rolled in the cinema when Scott Lang delivered his line "yeah, like a time machine". I knew straight away no matter how entertaining the rest of Endgame was, from here on in I would be picking holes in the plot at every turn. Then Tony Stark goes onto solve the time travel equation or whatever in about 10 seconds of screen time (I know he's a super genius but come on) and our heroes jump down the quantum tunnel to complete their time heist, which I'll admit is a pretty cool concept.
Endgame time travel rules are quite different to laws familiar to viewers from other franchises. Firstly the popular "butterfly effect" (best represented in Back to the Future) isn't in play here, and time loops such as the ones created in Prisoner of Azkaban are not possible either. Tilda Swinton's The Ancient One best describes the Endgame rules of time travel, which are based on the real life "many worlds theory", whereby changing something in the past does not affect the future but simply creates a new timeline - essentially a parallel universe. For the most part this logic holds up pretty well for the plot of Endgame, until Steve Rodgers turns up on that bench right at the film's close and has you questioning everything you thought you understood about the multiverse theory. It makes for a gaping plot hole that I can't seem to find a way around. Nonetheless the writers do well in not creating too many other time travel related plot snags (although if Gamora somehow shows up in future Guardians of the Galaxy instalments it better be well explained or I'll be pissed).
Time travel aside, Avengers: Endgame is every bit as entertaining as Infinity War, with nonstop fan service and more emotion than I thought possible from the superhero genre. I got genuine goosebumps at that shot of our heroes walking in almost slow motion towards the quantum tunnel, rivalled only by the goosebumps experienced upon the whole team emerging through portals and reuniting for the final battle. A couple of major character deaths had my eyes stinging as well, while I don't think a single joke fell flat. Everything is rounded off nicely by some breathtaking final credits, and just like that the epic Avengers saga is over forever. What an incredible journey it has been - the likes of we may never see again.
Endgame time travel rules are quite different to laws familiar to viewers from other franchises. Firstly the popular "butterfly effect" (best represented in Back to the Future) isn't in play here, and time loops such as the ones created in Prisoner of Azkaban are not possible either. Tilda Swinton's The Ancient One best describes the Endgame rules of time travel, which are based on the real life "many worlds theory", whereby changing something in the past does not affect the future but simply creates a new timeline - essentially a parallel universe. For the most part this logic holds up pretty well for the plot of Endgame, until Steve Rodgers turns up on that bench right at the film's close and has you questioning everything you thought you understood about the multiverse theory. It makes for a gaping plot hole that I can't seem to find a way around. Nonetheless the writers do well in not creating too many other time travel related plot snags (although if Gamora somehow shows up in future Guardians of the Galaxy instalments it better be well explained or I'll be pissed).
Time travel aside, Avengers: Endgame is every bit as entertaining as Infinity War, with nonstop fan service and more emotion than I thought possible from the superhero genre. I got genuine goosebumps at that shot of our heroes walking in almost slow motion towards the quantum tunnel, rivalled only by the goosebumps experienced upon the whole team emerging through portals and reuniting for the final battle. A couple of major character deaths had my eyes stinging as well, while I don't think a single joke fell flat. Everything is rounded off nicely by some breathtaking final credits, and just like that the epic Avengers saga is over forever. What an incredible journey it has been - the likes of we may never see again.
Whiplash
(2014)
Inspirational
4 June 2020
The synopsis of Whiplash never really peaked my interest enough to commit to watching the film. However it's impressive ranking in the IMDB top 250 eventually forced me to bite the bullet and give it a chance last night. I am so glad that I did.
In essence, the story is about a student striving to become the best, and a ruthless teacher pushing him physically and emotionally every step of the way. It does not matter if you have no interest in jazz or music at all for that matter, the themes are applicable to sports, singing, dancing - any competitive walk of life that requires the utmost dedication to get to the top. Anyone serious about doing so should watch Whiplash and use it as a source of inspiration.
Miles Teller and J.K. Simmons are incredible and the success of the film cruxes on their performances. Teller was most surprising, as an actor I'd only previously seen in the occasional rom com, in this role as the ambitiously determined student willing to put blood, sweat and tears into becoming the best. However it is Simmons who swept all the awards (including an Oscar for best supporting actor), playing the role of Teller's vicious bullying mentor and cramming every scene with tension and fear. He is an enigma and a rollercoaster - just when we think we understand his complex character he turns aggressive again and humiliates Andrew (Teller) once more.
As dark as this sounds, until literally 5 minutes from the end of this film I had no idea if our protagonist was going to triumph and finally win the respect of his mentor or end up killing himself. The stakes are really that high, and overall it makes for 100 minutes of incredible drama that you can't take your eyes off. I'd recommend Whiplash to anyone. 9/10.
In essence, the story is about a student striving to become the best, and a ruthless teacher pushing him physically and emotionally every step of the way. It does not matter if you have no interest in jazz or music at all for that matter, the themes are applicable to sports, singing, dancing - any competitive walk of life that requires the utmost dedication to get to the top. Anyone serious about doing so should watch Whiplash and use it as a source of inspiration.
Miles Teller and J.K. Simmons are incredible and the success of the film cruxes on their performances. Teller was most surprising, as an actor I'd only previously seen in the occasional rom com, in this role as the ambitiously determined student willing to put blood, sweat and tears into becoming the best. However it is Simmons who swept all the awards (including an Oscar for best supporting actor), playing the role of Teller's vicious bullying mentor and cramming every scene with tension and fear. He is an enigma and a rollercoaster - just when we think we understand his complex character he turns aggressive again and humiliates Andrew (Teller) once more.
As dark as this sounds, until literally 5 minutes from the end of this film I had no idea if our protagonist was going to triumph and finally win the respect of his mentor or end up killing himself. The stakes are really that high, and overall it makes for 100 minutes of incredible drama that you can't take your eyes off. I'd recommend Whiplash to anyone. 9/10.
Uncut Gems
(2019)
Sandler's Career Best
3 June 2020
When I was growing up, Adam Sandler was the biggest name in the film industry. Some of his movies were my absolute favourites - Happy Gilmore, Grown Ups, Just Go With It (to name a few). I've never understood how he faded away, starring exclusively in terrible films over the past 10 years. Did I just reach a certain age and no longer find his comedy funny anymore? I don't think so, because I still thoroughly enjoy myself watching his classics. If someone was to conduct a study into Sandler's incredible plummet from the top and write a dissertation on their findings then I would be very willing to read.
Uncut Gems may just have achieved the impossible by reviving Hollywood's biggest sleeping giant. I had no idea Adam Sandler was capable of a performance like this, and it is indeed his career best. The film lacks a clear cut plot (I guess you could describe it as... uncut) and to be honest I only started to enjoy it halfway through once I decided to view it as a character study of the contemptible Howard Ratner. There is barely a second of runtime where Sandler isn't on screen, so Uncut Gems presents us with over 2 hours of the life of Howard, a shady gems dealer and gambling addict. The character shouldn't be likeable - he makes poor choices at every turn, doesn't appear to give a toss about his family, and in general is manipulative, rude and vulgar. Yet I couldn't help but find myself willing him to win and walk away a hero. Maybe that's just the charm of Adam Sandler.
Uncut Gems has a strong and unforgettable finale, which nearly boosted my rating to 8/10 but overall this would not have reflected my enjoyment of the film. A lot of scenes (particularly in Howard's jewellery shop) were noisy with a lot of shouting, swearing and not much else in the way of dialogue, which in itself was often drowned out by an offensive score. Overall this made for a somewhat uncomfortable viewing experience that at times went as far as stressful. Sandler is magnificent in portraying the fascinating Howard Ratner however and ultimately that's what I'll remember Uncut Gems for. 7/10.
Uncut Gems may just have achieved the impossible by reviving Hollywood's biggest sleeping giant. I had no idea Adam Sandler was capable of a performance like this, and it is indeed his career best. The film lacks a clear cut plot (I guess you could describe it as... uncut) and to be honest I only started to enjoy it halfway through once I decided to view it as a character study of the contemptible Howard Ratner. There is barely a second of runtime where Sandler isn't on screen, so Uncut Gems presents us with over 2 hours of the life of Howard, a shady gems dealer and gambling addict. The character shouldn't be likeable - he makes poor choices at every turn, doesn't appear to give a toss about his family, and in general is manipulative, rude and vulgar. Yet I couldn't help but find myself willing him to win and walk away a hero. Maybe that's just the charm of Adam Sandler.
Uncut Gems has a strong and unforgettable finale, which nearly boosted my rating to 8/10 but overall this would not have reflected my enjoyment of the film. A lot of scenes (particularly in Howard's jewellery shop) were noisy with a lot of shouting, swearing and not much else in the way of dialogue, which in itself was often drowned out by an offensive score. Overall this made for a somewhat uncomfortable viewing experience that at times went as far as stressful. Sandler is magnificent in portraying the fascinating Howard Ratner however and ultimately that's what I'll remember Uncut Gems for. 7/10.
The Blues Brothers
(1980)
Unique Musical Comedy
2 June 2020
The Blues Brothers is the best musical comedy I've ever seen. Thinking about it, it might be the only musical comedy I've ever seen. The songs and choreography are fantastically entertaining nonetheless, and make Blues Brothers worth rewatching time and time again. My understanding is a lot of big names from the blues music genre are cast in various roles throughout the film, but other than Aretha Franklin I didn't recognise any of the others. I guess someone with more awareness of the blues genre would better appreciate this casting and consider the film to be an absolute masterpiece. Regardless, since watching Blues Brothers I've been influenced to listen to several of the featured artists on Spotify and have indeed listened to "Everybody Needs Somebody to Love" on repeat.
Therefore I can't think of another film that has such an impact on a specific music genre in the same way The Blues Brothers does. The reason I couldn't rate it any higher than 8/10 comes down to its comedy, which isn't not funny, but leaves a lot to be desired. There weren't so many laugh out loud moments as there were skits that forced a barely audible "ha". I'd describe the humour as silly and dry, which other viewers may be more tickled by than myself. Overall though nothing stops The Blues Brothers from affirming its status as a timeless cult classic.
Therefore I can't think of another film that has such an impact on a specific music genre in the same way The Blues Brothers does. The reason I couldn't rate it any higher than 8/10 comes down to its comedy, which isn't not funny, but leaves a lot to be desired. There weren't so many laugh out loud moments as there were skits that forced a barely audible "ha". I'd describe the humour as silly and dry, which other viewers may be more tickled by than myself. Overall though nothing stops The Blues Brothers from affirming its status as a timeless cult classic.
Avengers: Infinity War
(2018)
Masterpiece in Entertainment
27 May 2020
Avengers: Infinity War is unlike anything you've ever seen before. It is 10 years in the making, with 20 instalments leading up to it, all designed to introduce our lineup of 30 odd characters and hint at fragments of Infinity War plot throughout. When I left the cinema I couldn't quite believe the Russo brothers had actually managed to pull it off. On the face of it, the film should be a total mess, with too many characters and too many storylines unfolding in unison. But they absolutely smash it, creating a masterpiece which the likes of have never been seen before and most likely will never be seen again.
Thanos is the ultimate villain and about the best I've seen - not just in the superhero genre. His motives and actions throw your moral compass into disarray, creating a dynamic viewing experience. What's more, I can't think of any other film in the MCU where we don't genuinely believe from the outset that our heroes will survive and prevail to save the day, but with Infinity War these certainties cannot be so assured - the stakes are so much higher. The opening scene sets the tone, and from here on in there is no guarantee who will be left standing when the final credits role.
The story throws together characters from across the franchise in the most unexpected fashion - Thor teaming up with his good friends Rabbit and Tree; Tony Stark and Peter Quill fighting Thanos side by side. So much enjoyment stems from these unlikely groupings, and watching all these characters who we know and love, interacting and bouncing off each other, is just the definition of entertainment.
In the end Infinity War has you laughing and crying, often in the same scene, with a finale so shocking and unanticipated that it doesn't lose its impact no matter how many times you watch it over. Overall it is the best Marvel has to offer, and I don't think it will ever be topped. 10/10.
Thanos is the ultimate villain and about the best I've seen - not just in the superhero genre. His motives and actions throw your moral compass into disarray, creating a dynamic viewing experience. What's more, I can't think of any other film in the MCU where we don't genuinely believe from the outset that our heroes will survive and prevail to save the day, but with Infinity War these certainties cannot be so assured - the stakes are so much higher. The opening scene sets the tone, and from here on in there is no guarantee who will be left standing when the final credits role.
The story throws together characters from across the franchise in the most unexpected fashion - Thor teaming up with his good friends Rabbit and Tree; Tony Stark and Peter Quill fighting Thanos side by side. So much enjoyment stems from these unlikely groupings, and watching all these characters who we know and love, interacting and bouncing off each other, is just the definition of entertainment.
In the end Infinity War has you laughing and crying, often in the same scene, with a finale so shocking and unanticipated that it doesn't lose its impact no matter how many times you watch it over. Overall it is the best Marvel has to offer, and I don't think it will ever be topped. 10/10.
Thor: Ragnarok
(2017)
Visually Stunning
25 May 2020
A lot of the negative reviews surrounding Thor: Ragnarok focus on the character assassination of Thor as we know him before this film. You must have to be a die hard fan of the comic books to take issue with his u-turn in personality. As far as I'm concerned, there's a case to be made that Thor: The Dark World might be the worst film in the MCU, and it was always going to take something drastic to get cinema goers back in the door to see a sequel. I applaud Taika Waititi for doing just that.
Ragnarok is pitched as a comedy, which tries too hard at times to be funny, but overall works in finally giving Thor some personality. It has been a bizarre character arc watching this almighty Norse god transition into a slapstick joker figure. But it works (even if the transition is as sudden as the flick of a switch). The plot of Ragnarok focuses on the destruction of Asgard and therefore it can seem out of place at times when Thor's new colourful personality clashes with scenes relating to the decimation of his home realm. But overall the film functions very well as a comedy and is genuinely funny. Special mention must be given to the hilarious Korg (again, props to Taika Waititi).
Thor isn't the only character who finally gets a dose of personality in Ragnarok - the Incredible Hulk does too. It's never fully explained how the Hulk ends up on the planet of Sakaar, which is so far away that even Heimdall can barely see it. But we don't question it too much. I'm struggling to think of a more enjoyable scene in the entire MCU than the arena battle between Thor and Hulk, and their chemistry onscreen after this point makes for the best relationship between two Avengers. The only person who probably didn't enjoy the Hulk in Ragnarok is Edward Norton, who I believe had much darker and maturer ideas in mind for his character back in 2008. These creative differences that forced him to quit the franchise have finally paid off.
Overall however it was not the comedy and colourful characters that made me enjoy Ragnarok the most. From start to finish the film is visually stunning and I think it is this more than anything else that will force me in finding myself rewatching Ragnarok over and over again. By far and away the best Thor instalment and definitely one of the best in the MCU. 9/10.
Ragnarok is pitched as a comedy, which tries too hard at times to be funny, but overall works in finally giving Thor some personality. It has been a bizarre character arc watching this almighty Norse god transition into a slapstick joker figure. But it works (even if the transition is as sudden as the flick of a switch). The plot of Ragnarok focuses on the destruction of Asgard and therefore it can seem out of place at times when Thor's new colourful personality clashes with scenes relating to the decimation of his home realm. But overall the film functions very well as a comedy and is genuinely funny. Special mention must be given to the hilarious Korg (again, props to Taika Waititi).
Thor isn't the only character who finally gets a dose of personality in Ragnarok - the Incredible Hulk does too. It's never fully explained how the Hulk ends up on the planet of Sakaar, which is so far away that even Heimdall can barely see it. But we don't question it too much. I'm struggling to think of a more enjoyable scene in the entire MCU than the arena battle between Thor and Hulk, and their chemistry onscreen after this point makes for the best relationship between two Avengers. The only person who probably didn't enjoy the Hulk in Ragnarok is Edward Norton, who I believe had much darker and maturer ideas in mind for his character back in 2008. These creative differences that forced him to quit the franchise have finally paid off.
Overall however it was not the comedy and colourful characters that made me enjoy Ragnarok the most. From start to finish the film is visually stunning and I think it is this more than anything else that will force me in finding myself rewatching Ragnarok over and over again. By far and away the best Thor instalment and definitely one of the best in the MCU. 9/10.
Perfect Prelude to an Epic Finale
24 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I've seen this film almost countless times now and it never fails to jerk a tear in the penultimate scene. It is shot so beautifully and emotionally, I just wonder how much more of an impact could've been made if Dobby had been given more screen time throughout the series - something I've never quite forgiven the producers for.
Deathly Hallows Part I succeeds in creating an even darker and more foreboding atmosphere than Half-Blood Prince, and this time round Yates and co. finally get it right in including all the scenes avid fans of the source material needed to see. The acting on display reaches new levels, especially from our golden trio, who would not have been able to hold the film on their own in earlier instalments. Any criticism towards the choice to split Deathly Hallows into two parts is massively unwarranted. Other franchises have failed miserably in this feat (most notably Hunger Games) but for the epic finale of Harry Potter it is absolutely justified. I don't want to even think about how much detail or how many crucial and entertaining scenes would've been cut if Deathly Hallows had been crammed into 150 odd minutes. I shudder thinking about how horribly the pacing of the films would've been affected as well. Even if financial and capitalist motives were at play, the decision to split the finale into two episodes was absolutely the right one.
Overall Deathly Hallows Part I sets up Part II perfectly while also functioning as a highly enjoyable movie in its own right. 9/10.
Deathly Hallows Part I succeeds in creating an even darker and more foreboding atmosphere than Half-Blood Prince, and this time round Yates and co. finally get it right in including all the scenes avid fans of the source material needed to see. The acting on display reaches new levels, especially from our golden trio, who would not have been able to hold the film on their own in earlier instalments. Any criticism towards the choice to split Deathly Hallows into two parts is massively unwarranted. Other franchises have failed miserably in this feat (most notably Hunger Games) but for the epic finale of Harry Potter it is absolutely justified. I don't want to even think about how much detail or how many crucial and entertaining scenes would've been cut if Deathly Hallows had been crammed into 150 odd minutes. I shudder thinking about how horribly the pacing of the films would've been affected as well. Even if financial and capitalist motives were at play, the decision to split the finale into two episodes was absolutely the right one.
Overall Deathly Hallows Part I sets up Part II perfectly while also functioning as a highly enjoyable movie in its own right. 9/10.
The Great Escape
(1963)
Never Give Up
18 May 2020
The Great Escape has a runtime of 172 minutes, and the story has you hooked for every single one of them. From the outset the concept of Stalag Luft III is pitched to the viewer - a camp built especially for prisoners who have a proven aptitude in escapism; all the Luftwaffe's "rotten eggs in one basket". From here on in the plot wastes no time in getting to business, and the resourcefulness and willpower shown by our main characters throughout is captivating. From what I've read, the events depicted are fairly historically accurate and I find that amazing. By the time the iconic theme music plays at the film's close I had laughed, cried, fallen off my seat, and everything in between. Overall The Great Escape left me with an important message, best epitomised by Steve McQueen (The Cooler King) in the final scene - never, ever give up.
If I had to give one criticism of the film then I felt that the Nazi guards of the prison camp were not evil enough. I get that history dictates the airmen between opposing forces had a certain respect for each other and therefore the prisoners of a Luftwaffe Oflag were treated quite handsomely. But this historical accuracy does the film no justice, as for the most part I felt the consequences of the prisoners getting caught actioning an escape plan would've generated way more tension if I was led to believe they would involve a firing squad. One guard in particular personified this softness amongst the Nazis - Werner "The Ferret", who could almost be described as comical. I guess overall it detracted from the accomplishment of the escape, and to be honest it's the only thing stopping me giving this film a flawless 10/10 rating. All things considered however, nothing stops The Great Escape from being an absolute timeless classic.
If I had to give one criticism of the film then I felt that the Nazi guards of the prison camp were not evil enough. I get that history dictates the airmen between opposing forces had a certain respect for each other and therefore the prisoners of a Luftwaffe Oflag were treated quite handsomely. But this historical accuracy does the film no justice, as for the most part I felt the consequences of the prisoners getting caught actioning an escape plan would've generated way more tension if I was led to believe they would involve a firing squad. One guard in particular personified this softness amongst the Nazis - Werner "The Ferret", who could almost be described as comical. I guess overall it detracted from the accomplishment of the escape, and to be honest it's the only thing stopping me giving this film a flawless 10/10 rating. All things considered however, nothing stops The Great Escape from being an absolute timeless classic.
Philadelphia
(1993)
Seen Better Courtroom Dramas
16 May 2020
Philadelphia explores some fairly important and interesting themes, and some of the acting on display is outstanding, but for me the film leaves a lot to be desired. I didn't particularly enjoy the pacing of the film, especially leading up to the court battle, which in itself didn't deliver the gasps and tension typically expected of a courtroom drama. Tom Hanks is incredible throughout however and worthy of the Academy Award for best actor, although I maintain his career best performance is saved for Forrest Gump.
Denzel Washington also plays his part magnificently well as Joe Miller, a conflicted father and lawyer who is institutionalised by a homophobic, AIDS fearing culture. His transformation of character gives the story greater depth, although after initially being appalled by the idea, his motives for taking on Andy's (Hanks) case are unclear and mar his compelling arc.
Overall the soundtrack and class acting make Philadelphia worth a watch, but when it comes to courtroom dramas I've certainly seen better.
Denzel Washington also plays his part magnificently well as Joe Miller, a conflicted father and lawyer who is institutionalised by a homophobic, AIDS fearing culture. His transformation of character gives the story greater depth, although after initially being appalled by the idea, his motives for taking on Andy's (Hanks) case are unclear and mar his compelling arc.
Overall the soundtrack and class acting make Philadelphia worth a watch, but when it comes to courtroom dramas I've certainly seen better.
Dark, Gritty and Atmospheric
13 May 2020
I've seen a lot of criticism towards the producers for straying somewhat from the source material in Half-Blood Prince. So far the big screen adaptations have rarely included any scene or other that is not explicitly stated in the works of JK Rowling. I can see why a lot of hardcore fans of the books are disappointed in some of the decisions to deviate from the origin - I too am one of those fans - but to be wholly honest the movie is all the better for such scenes. The much maligned Burrow attack scene seems to have caused the most tears throughout reviews. I believe Yates and co. took the initiative to include this act as a device to shoehorn Bellatrix somewhere onto the screen, and as far as I'm concerned the more we see of Helena Bonham Carter in this role the better. So overall I am not critical at all of the producers' decisions to stray from the books, and thought a defence of these judgements was in order.
The cinematography on display is outstanding and contributes a great deal towards generating a dark, foreboding atmosphere - from the first minute to the last. A lot of the shots involving Draco especially are impressive in showing him lurking around Hogwarts. Tom Felton gives his best performance yet as Malfoy, and in fact the acting across the board is head and shoulders above what we've seen so far in the series. Special mention must be given to Jim Broadbent, who is an excellent addition to the cast, and Michael Gambon for his compelling showing as Dumbledore in the final few scenes.
As a film, the Half-Blood Prince is the best of the series so far and merits a way higher star rating than it currently pertains. My second favourite Harry Potter - 9/10.
The cinematography on display is outstanding and contributes a great deal towards generating a dark, foreboding atmosphere - from the first minute to the last. A lot of the shots involving Draco especially are impressive in showing him lurking around Hogwarts. Tom Felton gives his best performance yet as Malfoy, and in fact the acting across the board is head and shoulders above what we've seen so far in the series. Special mention must be given to Jim Broadbent, who is an excellent addition to the cast, and Michael Gambon for his compelling showing as Dumbledore in the final few scenes.
As a film, the Half-Blood Prince is the best of the series so far and merits a way higher star rating than it currently pertains. My second favourite Harry Potter - 9/10.
Tell Your Friends