Why would someone waste time doing such superficial and bad movie? Another child possessed by a sweary demon? Another family that moves to a strange place? Another priest that rides a vespa?
Ok, that was the only new idea in the movie, but it didn't save the film, Russel.
So, old and superficial ideas badly developed. It's a story about the chief of the exorcists, man. Why did they use the same old story? Is the only one in that priest's books?
I understand that they tried to bring a different kind of prist, that had a different look to the situations, but the mix of little jokes and a such a superficial characters and situations just made it a bad movie.
They actually had the nerve to absolve the catolic church form the horrors of the inquisition. It was a "demon" that possessed the church, guys, not the persons that killed other people because o their on volition.
And, with no surprise, the demons that the priests face in the final battle had the shape of women. "but it's because of their's personal lives that...." Stop.
Is possible to make new stories. Good ones, please.
Ok, that was the only new idea in the movie, but it didn't save the film, Russel.
So, old and superficial ideas badly developed. It's a story about the chief of the exorcists, man. Why did they use the same old story? Is the only one in that priest's books?
I understand that they tried to bring a different kind of prist, that had a different look to the situations, but the mix of little jokes and a such a superficial characters and situations just made it a bad movie.
They actually had the nerve to absolve the catolic church form the horrors of the inquisition. It was a "demon" that possessed the church, guys, not the persons that killed other people because o their on volition.
And, with no surprise, the demons that the priests face in the final battle had the shape of women. "but it's because of their's personal lives that...." Stop.
Is possible to make new stories. Good ones, please.
Tell Your Friends