Reviews

11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Melancholia (2011)
10/10
A beautiful meditation on Being and Nothingness
2 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Probably the most beautifully filmed depiction on being and nothingness, ever.

I have to warn you, if you like your films light and fluffy, or disaster-films full of apocalyptic warnings and roomful of scientists explaining charts to military personnel, then don't bother with this film, this will not be your cup of tea.

If on the other hand, you're used to Von Trier's work, his dark visions of human nature, his haunting cinematography and you're up on your European art and classical education, come watch this and be challenged, pick up the clues, put the jig-saw puzzle together, be blown away and finally silenced into awe.

Von Trier has a polarizing affect of his audience, you either love his films or hate them and I'll be upfront, I love his films because he goes places as a director, where angels normally fear to tread. That takes a certain amount of guts, audacity and a whole lot of vision and originality.

The opening scenes are a series of vignettes, which by themselves are so heart-breakingly beautiful, they could be painting by themselves, not unlike the visual poetry of the late Tarkovsky or Kieslowski. A castle, two beautiful women and a child drenched in eery moonlight, a bride walking away from a forest as plants seem to be grasping her like something out of an evil fairy tale, a mother and child sinking into the ground, a regal castle and estate looking out over the sea, the tiny Earth colliding into a super planet, Melancholia. A sense of doom hangs over everything.

Kirsten Dunst plays Justine, like Ophelia in Sir John Everett Millais' painting, floating in the river and disconnected from the world, not only literally but mentally too in her depression. Money, wealth, power, what does it all mean when you're miserable? Like the Marquis de Sade's Justine, nothing can reach her, not even love or sex. The brightest star in Scorpio, Antares, has suddenly tuned blue. Her little nephew, Leo has built a contraption to view the distance of the planet Melancholia by placing it near the heart. The animals have gone silent.

Students of medieval studies will understand the old cosmological world view of attributing absolutely everything in this world to the influence of the old 7 planets, much like C.S Lewis did in his depiction of the Narnia stories, each book attributed with themes and motifs according to each planet. Von Trier does the same here on a much smaller scale. The Saturnine difficult mother, the Jovial happy go lucky father, the heart- centered Son(Sun) Leo, the Mercurial silver-tongued brother-in law John, so good at convincing everyone, the aggressive jerk boss (Mars), the kind, loving husband Michael (Venus), the ever-changing moods of the sister Claire (de Lune -->Moon), the bride who is slowly dying from the inside, Justine (Earth).

This film is a meditation on the ultimate emptiness of what we deem to be markers of civilization and culture or success. How in the face of impending doom all these things are finally reduced to what they really mean in the grand scheme of things, absolutely nothing. That may sound depressing when viewed through the lens of Western civilization and materialism, but in many ways this is the doctrine of emptiness which the Buddhists have been preaching about for millennia. This isn't something depressing for them but rather is actually a clarion call to add real meaning to one's life instead by virtue of good deeds and the quality and integrity of the relationships around you, not just by accumulating needless stuff.

Maybe it has to do with the sense of malaise the world is feeling now, with the economic downturn, the protesters aflame the world over on the ideological death of capitalism, maybe it's the Mayan calendar allegedly ending in 2012 or the planet Nibiru returning like Zecharia Sitchin wrote about and no doubt influenced Von Trier, who knows? But the film has been timed perfectly to catch the mood and zeitgeist of the world in late 2011.

The final scene is one which I don't think I will ever forget and probably ranks right up there with the most amazing scenes ever portrayed on film, beautiful in it's simplicity and awesome in it's power. A Native American-like teepee or sweat lodge is built on top of a hill, at the end of the film, the "magic cave" which Justine promises to Leo will help them. Claire, Justine and Leo sit down inside, they hold hands in a circle because all they have left is each other now. The Earth is no more.
12 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An ode to humanity
19 December 2008
Danny Boyle does it again! While being grossly under-appreciated in Hollywood circles, this generation's answer to Frank Capra, Steven Spielberg and Francois Truffault has crafted yet another masterpiece for the Generations X and Y crowd, in the vein of "Trainspotting", "Millions" and "28 Days Later". With visuals reminiscent of "City of God", a soundtrack straight out of the hippest clubs of London and a tale which is both evocative of Charles Dickens (in it's depiction of the poor and the slums) and Sinclair Lewis (with his social commentary on "Progress" with a capital P), Boyle has finally brought India to mainstream Hollywood and North America. This film will become a historical document as Mumbai itself is the backdrop of the story and we witness the transformation of that city from 3rd world mega-city backwater, to being on the verge of becoming one of this century's financial and cultural hubs, along with Beijing and Dubai. As Asia takes center stage as it shakes off centuries of colonial-imposed self- doubt and lack of confidence, Boyle has masterfully delivered a narrative for the ages on the cost of progress, both morally and historically and on the redemptive power of true love. The cast of largely unknown actors were first-class with an exceptionally talented group of children. It may sound sad at first glance, a story about kids growing up in slums etc. but in actuality this is a film of exuberance, full of life, intensity and joy and to paraphrase Richard Corlis of Time, an ode to humanity. Don't wait for the DVD, see this on the big screen NOW! ( 10/10 )
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Power of Projection and Happiness
19 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
After reading the horrid user-based reviews and seeing that most of the professional film critics in this world seemed to LOVE this movie, plus the fact that it is a Mike Leigh movie, it all had me intrigued.

I was not disappointed. I don't think most viewers got this film, it's not a typical Hollywood film by any stretch of the imagination. What it is, is a very, very wise film on the power of projecting our feelings and issues on to other people.

Poppy is indeed happy-go-lucky, she's 30, an elementary school teacher in North London, no investments, no real estate, no boyfriend, no savings. Yet, instead, she fully lives and inhabits each moment of her life, she loves her friends, she loves her messy apartment, she accepts each day as it comes, whether that means having fun with your friends at a London dance club, jumping on trampolines or taking flamenco lessons. She's happy and her joy comes from somewhere inside of her and it's authentic. She doesn't worry about tomorrow because all she has is today. Watching the people around her, like her obnoxious married and pregnant sister, her sourpuss driving instructor and even her exasperated friends, you realize that they are the ones with problems, projecting their own issues on to Poppy, that there are people in this world who don't want you to be happy because they'd prefer to see you as miserable as they are. So if you want to watch this happen, then by all means go see this movie.

The ending is absolutely brilliant and will knock you off your seat. Eddie Marsan deserves an Academy Award nomination for his tortured Scott, the driving instructor as does Sally Hawkins as Poppy.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Into the Wild (2007)
10/10
A meditative masterpiece
9 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Any basic literature course will teach you that all great literature focus on a central conflict, either: 1) Man against Man 2) Man against himself 3) Man against Nature It is the rare bird which comes along once in a while which encompasses all three and "Into the Wild" does just that.

Some reviewers have asserted that Christopher McCandeless was a naive, idealistic loony who lost it in the wilds of Alasaka. In actuality, he was someone running away from the demons of his family life and trying to find himself in the process. In order to do that, he rejected the affluent life of comfort which was there for the taking (stellar athlete and student, new car, Harvard Law etc.) and instead hobo'ed his way across America, picking up menial jobs here and there and befriending other marginal types on his road to self-discovery which eventually leads him to an abandoned bus in the Alaskan wilderness.

I won't say anymore about the plot, but this film is so much more than a film, it's a meditation on existence and on what we label "normal", there is wisdom especially in the the words of Mr. Franz. The is love, there is pain, there is family, there is The Journey. There is also an honest and brutal questioning. In short, the film touches on all the most important aspects of life. Please do yourself a favor and see this film on the large screen, the cinematography is flawless and the real America (or what's left of it) shows off her truest most beautiful self here. I hope the Academy honor's Sean Penn and Emile Hirsch for their outstanding work.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The German "Shawshank Redemption"
22 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I just saw this film this past weekend, I wanted to catch it because it looks like it will be leaving the theaters here shortly, no doubt to be replaced by some God-awful American summer blockbuster...

I call this the German "Shawshank Redemption" because like Shawshank, I left the cinema feeling clean, a phenomena I have only noticed with "To Kill a Mockingbird", when I say clean, I mean my faith in human dignity and the human condition is restored. Another thing is has in common with Shawshank is that you see the worst in human nature but at the very end, you also see the very best in us too.

The director clearly has faith in the good we can do to each other, and why not? We see enough stupidity and ugliness in film, why not reflect on the beauty also? Everything about this film is top-notch, the direction, the actors, the production, the dialog, the visuals, the close-ups - proof-positive that as long as you have a competent crew and an excellent script, then you don't need hundreds of millions to make a film, that you can make an excellent film with the simplest of elements as long as you know exactly what message you want to convey - a lesson many a studio-head in LA can think about.

It's an indictment on the film industry that this masterpiece will not be seen by the millions of film-goers the world over and have the audience it deserves, that only the film festival crowds, the art-house film crowd and the IFC-channel crowd will be gifted by this film. If it's playing in your town, make it a point to see it before it goes.

Now there's buzz that some Hollywood director may make an "American" version of this in English - big mistake if you ask me - Look what happened when they touched Wim Wenders' "Wings of Desire" ---> "City of Angels" - don't do it, leave this film alone, it deserves to be seen in it's original format, the reality of the former East Germany, the Stasi, the real cost of freedom and democracy are all lessons we need to know about.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beautiful losers indeed!
25 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I just came out of a packed house preview here in Montreal with a buddy of mine and like *W*O*W*! Were we ever surprised! Not only did the house literally come down with the amount of laughter coming out of the audience, but I kid you not, every single person who walked out after wards had a wistful but goofy smile plastered across their face.

First off, this cast was superb all round. It goes without saying that Toni Collette, Greg Kinnear and Alan Arkin are all talented - we already know that given their respective bodies of work. Thank heavens that Dakota Fanning wasn't cast as Olive and I hope Abigail Breslin starts to put a dent in Dakota's career from now on. This little girl really has some serious acting chops and testament to that was her ability to be absolutely sweet and insecure at the same time without looking wide-eyed, spacey and screaming all the time. Steve Carell was another revelation, we already know what a talented comedian he is but who would have guessed this guy can also do serious acting? In the beginning he is an extremely tortured soul, life has thrown him enough knocks in a relatively short amount of time where he is literally at the brink of losing it. His embarrassment at facing a lost love, his shame and his pain are all very, very palpable, more so because in some ways we've all been there. This isn't Shakespearian tragedy on a mythic scale, this is the wear and tear of everyday, commonplace loss we have all to some degree felt. He really brought a level of humanity to his role, something we barely see in Hollywood anymore. Another name to keep a look out for the future is Paul Dano, who play's Dwayne, the Nietzche-reading angst-ridden goth teen-aged older brother who has taken a vow of silence until that time he is accepted to become an Air Force pilot. Literally without saying a word for 80% of this film, he was able to express the magnitude of his disgust at his family, his situation and ultimately himself with nothing more than body language, facial expressions and pure presence. His scene where he discovers the reality of his situation was easily the most intense in the film and one of the most honest and emotionally painful to watch.

In many ways, this movie is about beautiful losers, one by one as each main character faces loss and needs to deal with the reality of lost dreams and hopes, they start to place their hopes and wishes on Olive and the Little Miss Sunshine pageant in Redondo Beach, California. What you also realize is underneath this picture of a completely dysfunctional family and the personal "issues" each individual carries, beneath it all, every person in this family ultimately has a lot of love for one another especially for Olive. Once they realize that they're not going to get what they want, they take that hope and drive and give it to Olive unselfishly.

The film is also a literal and symbolic meditation on journeys - yeah, they're on a road trip from Arizona to California and some of the scenes were indeed shot beautifully but it's also about how members of this family also had to journey far inside themselves to help Olive in this one crazy weekend. It is also an indictment on the culture of fierce competition which we are all living in, winning at all costs and the insanity of how these ideas are already, insidiously affecting children from the get-go. Watching some of the kids in the beauty pageant alone was sickening. In some ways, it shows that it's not competition which is always the best thing but cooperation can do the job just as well minus the neuroses and emotional damage.

Did I also mention how hilarious this film is? I won't give away the ending but please do your best to make this the sleeper hit of 2006. You won't regret it.

In conclusion, a deeply-satisfying film experience.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Flirting (1991)
10/10
Another unseen gem
16 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This has got to be by far one of the most touching, intelligent, sensitive and emotionally mature and rewarding films out there on first love. What is also truly impressive is that it deals with this topic while also touching on inter-racial love, racism, African colonialism, and Jean-Paul Sarte without ever once becoming condescending or maudlin. It is a film that not only respects the feelings of the two fully-inhabited main character but by doing so, makes the viewer all the more involved in their world and feelings for each other. The director and the script both assume that the viewer is intelligent and the viewer is accordingly rewarded.

Noah Taylor and Thandie Newton are truly exceptional and highly intelligent actors and watching both their bodies of work like "Shine", "Max", "Beseiged" and "Crash has truly been a pleasure. I do hope the best is yet to come from these fine actors and I'm sure their futures are bright.

Much has been made of Nicole Kidman in this film but really she's only a secondary character as well as the young Naomi Watts. I wish Hollywood would stop looking at this film as a Nicole Kidman vehicle when truly Taylor and Newton deserve the attention for this early work.

This movie is also beautifully shot, especially the scenes when Danny rows his boat over the river by moonlight or watching the two of them skim rocks over the water surface or Danny at the end, reading Thandie's letter on the windy rocks and the sky suddenly clearing up on him. At the very end Danny come to the very mature realization on the transcendent nature of true love, something which I don't think he understood in "The Year My Voice Broke".

I actually went out and got this film on DVD and never tire of watching it from time to time, a sign of great film. It really reminds you of what it was once like when those first feelings of romantic love started to appear in your life, all the promise, the novelty and the authenticity as well as the insecurities. So it's not really just a "teen" movie, I think just about anyone who has had these experiences can appreciate this gem of a film.

Do yourself a favour and try finding a copy, you won't regret it.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I hated it the 1st time, but it grew on me...
16 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this movie in theaters when it first came out and was quite curious because of the hype surrounding it at the time. When I walked out, all I could hear myself saying in my mind was "What the hell just happened?" and felt like going back to the box office and asking for my 10 bucks back.

Reader, I positively *hated* it - I didn't "get" the humour and I thought all the people in this movie were just plain weird - like somehow this movie was "trying" too hard to be funny yet the humour was falling flat. Also the style of most of the folks had me wondering if this movie was in the 80's or something or if the film makers were torn between setting this movie up in the 80's or 90's or maybe if the film makers were making some sort of statement on mid-westerners being 10 years behind us east and west coasters - I mean the weird T-shirts, Naploleon's hair and attire, the break-dancing music, Deb wearing stir-up pants, the ponytail on one side, 80's music like Cyndi Lauper and poofy prom dresses. The only thing that gave it away that this film takes place more recently were the references to the Internet for Uncle Rico's time machine, the heavy techno-dance music that Pedro's cousin play in their muscle mobile and Kip's online romance with Lafawnduh as well as Napoleon's dance sequence to Jamiroquoi's "Canned Heat" at the very end (which BTW, seemed to be inspired by the "Solid Gold" dancers of the 70's and 80's).

Then something strange happened. The film cable channels here started playing it frequently and I'd catch bits and pieces of it here and there and found myself enjoying the humour more and more. I was finally getting it and enjoying it - I was even starting the know certain parts of it by heart. My brother went out and bought the DVD of the film and now I can safely say, I really love this little film. After being absorbed in Napoleon's universe, you realize he's actually a really good kid and just trying to find his place in the grand scheme of things despite being misunderstood at school and at home. You end up *wanting* Napoleon to succeed and be happy and I think we can safely assume he does. In some ways, this film is like Napoleon, it's the small-budget film that could and I'm glad to see the cult following this film has developed. It deserves all it gets.

To those of you who hated this film after watching it once, all I can say is I'd encourage you to watch it once more and give it a chance. I'm sure glad I did.
129 out of 142 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hauntingly bittersweet and beautiful
20 December 2005
I too like many others who have posted here, watched this every holiday season here in Canada along with "The Happy Prince" and the Richard Chamberlain-narrated "The Little Mermaid" - all were produced by Potterton Productions with Reader's Digest Canada.

I have met Gerald Potterton and asked him about these animated shorts and it doesn't look like they will ever be coming out on DVD anytime soon. Because of legal issues when Reader's Digest film division closed down, the rights to these shorts have become forever lost.

It's a crying shame, the testament to the beauty of this animated feature is that even after not having watched it in over 25 years, I was still able to remember the story, the songs and the wonderful characters. Certain scenes stayed with me for years. At one point, I wasn't sure if it had all been real or not but after talking to friends here, I was glad to see that many others here had also watched it during the holidays.

As a child, the religious symbolism was lost on me but not the moral of the tale, the story of selflessness as ultimately being a good. It's a much needed reminder for children today and unfortunate that today's animated features shy away from such topics and fail to meet the quality of this charming little feature. Do yourself a favour and try finding a VHS copy either through ebay or Amazon, you won't regret it and nor will members of your family. This one is a keeper.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A *G*R*E*A*T* ride!
19 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Take your 11 odd bucks and hurry over to your nearest showing, because trust me, you will need a large screen to take this landmark, visually stunning piece in - maybe even several times over.

I'm truly surprised at the amount of negative reviews here and like another reviewer, I agree that is a shame because it will keep some folks who will totally fall for this flick away. And this film deserves to be watched. The theatre we were in last night at the Saturday late-night showing was close to full and was a predominantly male crowd, but that's not to say that women won't like it either. This film is for anyone who enjoyed "Raiders of the Lost Ark", loved watching "Transformers" as a kid, the work of Ray Harryhausen, the look of Art Nouveau/Art Deco and Fritz Lang films and who generally likes to marvel at stunning visuals and technological mastery.

***Slight Spoiler**** Yes, the movie looks great. Yes, there is a lot of CGI. Yes, the plot and script aren't perfect and yes, the acting is choppy. One thing I will give this film credit for is that it truly unmasks Gwyneth Paltrow as the over-rated,untalented actress that she is especially when she's next to a heavy-weight like Michael Gambon. You just wanted to keep slapping her by the end of the film or hoping that she'll fall off the side of the rocket, she's THAT annoying. And as far as I'm concerned, Angelina Jolie is the REAL Sky Captain in this film...she's that kewl and that kick-ass. What I also found interesting was the way they digitally "re-created" Laurence Olivier, it's always a treat to see an old master back, even if he is re-constituted.

I'm sure this film is going to be mentioned in future film-making textbooks and rightly so. We've passed a watershed of sorts, and now it's going to open up the playing field for so much more and better but like all watermarks, I have a feeling that it is going to be one of those films that should have been watched and appreciated more in it's own time, but won't be (think "Citizen Kane) I say that last sentence ONLY from the technical side of things. It's only when we look back we'll see it for what it really is and will be.

Now having said all of that, for fantasy/sci-fi buffs, this movie is *W*A*Y* more better than the disappointing offerings of the summer of 2004. Forget "Harry Potter 3","Chronicles of Riddick" or "Spiderman 2" , THIS is the one you've been waiting for in order to be dazzled and overwhelmed. If you're not willing to shell out evening prices, this is more than well-worth a matinée price, don't wait to see it on a TV screen. Go check it out and decide for yourselves. 9.75/10.00
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An utter and thorough disappointment
5 June 2004
I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one here who feels that this 3rd installment really bites. Like most fans, we bought tickets long in advance and saw a late night screening to bypass screaming and disruptive children and the audience was quite mature so these were die-hard adult fans here. I should have taken my cue and known in advance that this would disappoint. Taking the escalator up to the third floor of the megaplex, I saw nothing but long, withdrawn silent faces coming down the escalator on the opposite side. It went downhill from there. Granted, the effects were spectacular, the hybrid animal creatures, the transformations etc. etc. etc. Top notch but with an unlimited budget, you can do that and nothing less should be expected or accepted at this stage of the game. What was the serious flaw in this film was the sense of continuity and the sense of flow. Truthfully, there was no flow at all but rather a series of choppy transitions from scene to scene and story point to story point. It did not feel at all like you were flowing along with the story. Rather, it felt like there was a stacatto sense of rhythm and you were being jerked around. Many, many points in the books were completely lost and I agree with another reviewer that if this is the way the film franchise is going, perhaps in the future "Loosely based on the book..." should be prominently advertised. Purists of the books will be disappointed and mostly anyone who likes Harry Potter Anything will most likely be the biggest fans.

To give a small example of the continuity problem, Hagrid's cabin was in the first 2 films in a level meadow right next to the Dark forest. In this film they've suddenly set up shop on the side of some Scottish mountain and have changed locations completely. Acting-wise, the kids are finally finding their feet with Emma Watson taking the lead. Daniel Radcliffe still needs some work. The film features some of the best actors in the English-speaking language. The sign of a superior actor or actress is how much they can make out of what they've been given and with what very little these thespians were given, all of them churned out decent work. Gary Oldman and David Thewlis did excellent jobs despite the bad editing and flow. Emma Thompson is clearly having fun as Prof. Trelawney and Michael Gambon does a different, but regal nonetheless, Dumbledore. Dame Maggie Smith is just a token presence in this film as is Julie Christie, a shame really. Alan Rickman is still tops as Snape. I also agree with another reviewer what is also obvious is the complete lack of genuine humour here. You have bits and pieces but nothing like that found in the spirit of the book. For the $11.50 I paid, I would tell film fans to save your money, wait for it on cable or for the DVD or better yet, watch it for free at a friend's place who happens to own the DVD or has cable. For sci-fi and fantasy film buffs, it looks like we'll have to wait for Chronicles of Riddick, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow and Spiderman 2 this summer. A real shame.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed