Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Cloud Atlas (2012)
8/10
A bold, audacious tour-de-force in cinematic storytelling
10 September 2012
This movie is a fusion of several genres (drama, adventure, sci-fi, comedy, romantic tragedy) as well as an attempt for an art-house cerebral movie to attain commercial blockbuster status. In my opinion it mostly succeeds, but finding a large mainstream audience is its biggest challenge to be met (at this point, before wide release).

Imagine taking six short (but big-budget) films with different stories and directors and combining them into an anthology feature, united by a common theme and cast of actors in different roles, and then editing the entire thing out of sequence. The "nested" narrative of the book has been re-arranged for the sake of the visual medium of film, and after first being introduced to the 6 worlds, it's not that hard to keep track of who's who, what's what and where & when. Frankly, it's a shoo-in for an Oscar nomination for Best Editing - it works very well considering the challenge of making it flow coherently.

The cinematography, set & art design, music score and performances range from good to great. The make-up in some cases created a distraction (a Korean woman transformed into a red-haired Caucasian; Hugo Weaving as a buxom female nurse) but it adds a bit of fun to the experience. There's a smörgåsbord of material here for most people: human drama, mystery, violence, sex, adventure, farcical comedy, gloomy sci-fi and occasional romance (both gay and straight). It's 6 movies for the price of one! Just be ready to spend almost 3 hours in your seat and suffer a bit of whiplash as the transitions can get frenetic at times, with multiple cliff-hangers happening simultaneously. Like a good roller-coaster, it has its lulls and rushes. Some might find the finale a bit conventional, sappy or anti-climactic. But there's no denying this is a big, expensive gamble on the part of the Wachowskis and their producers. Hopefully it'll achieve the kind of success they got with the first "Matrix" and not the fate of the abysmal "Speed Racer." (PS I saw the film at its world premiere at TIFF.)
265 out of 413 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Prometheus (I) (2012)
6/10
A quasi-prequel that delivers nice FX but corrupts the Alien canon
11 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I know many have already stated this, but here goes: the film looks great, but the pseudo-philosophy and ersatz science of the story and premise are pretty weak. And why must every space faring crew include unlikable morons and goof-balls with anger-management issues? These are supposed to be top-notch scientists and some behave like horny juveniles and cyber-punks on meth. The characters are stereotypes and clichés. Having said that, the links to the original Alien universe are welcome after the lousy AVP series muddied things up. The set design and H.R. Giger motifs are beautifully rendered. But again, the script has serious problems in logic. Why must an advanced race of space travellers sacrifice themselves to "seed" a planet with DNA? We in the 21st century are able to extract organic material without killing ourselves - why can't they? If the Engineers' DNA is a "perfect identical match" with our own, after millions of years of evolution, why aren't we 10-foot-tall white-skinned humanoids with big black eyes like them? It'd be more plausible if the match were 99% instead. The Engineer/Space Jockey who's revived erupts into a homicidal rampage for no apparent reason. Pretty primitive behavior for an intelligent, enlightened being who supposedly fathered our species. I just wish somebody with more knowledge in science, biology and human behavior had worked on the script before Ridley Scott was given $150,000,000 to spend on this ambitious, but seriously flawed production. It could have been a worthy entry in the franchise instead of a half-baked hodge-podge mess.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed